throbber
AS'|'l1 D192? '13 — lJ‘?5"l5]:lJ D53‘-l5?? BIJH —
`
`45”’ Designation: D 1922 - 93
`
`AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERMLS
`1916 Race 8!. Phladolphld, Pa19103
`Reprinted from the Annual Book of ASTM standards. copyright ASTM
`it not listed In the current combined Index, will appear h the nets edltlon.
`
`Standard Test Method for
`
`Propagation Tear Resistance of Plastic Film and Thin
`Sheeting by Pendulum Method‘
`
`This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 1922; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
`original adoption or, in the case of revision. the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
`superscript epsilon (t) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
`
`1. Scope
`l.l This test method’ covers the determination of the
`average force to propagate tearing through a specified length
`of plastic film or nonrigid sheeting. After the tear has been
`started using an Elmcndorf-type tearing tester, two speci-
`mens are cited, a rectangular type and one with a constant
`radius testing length. The latter shall be the preferred or
`referee specimen.
`1.2 Because of (I) difficulties in selecting uniformly iden-
`tical specimens, (2) the varying degree of orientation in some
`plastic films, and (3) the difficulty found in testing highly
`extensible or highly oriented materials, or both, the repro-
`ducibility of the test results may be variable and, in some
`cases, not good or misleading. Provisions are made in the test
`method to compensate for oblique directional tearing which
`may be found with some materials.
`1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
`standard. The values given in parentheses are for informa-
`tion only.
`1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
`safety problems, if any, associated with its use. It is the
`responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
`priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
`bility ofregulatory limitations prior to use.
`
`2. Referenced Documents
`
`2.1 ASTM Standards:
`D374 Test Methods for Thickness of Solid Electrical
`Insulation’
`D618 Practice for Conditioning Plastics and Electrical
`Insulating Materials for Testing‘
`
`‘This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D-20 on
`Plastics and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D 20.10 on Mechanical
`Properties.
`Omen! edition approved Oct. I5, I993. Published December 1993. Originally
`published as D I922 - 6| T. Last previous edition D 1922 - 89.
`1 This test method has been adapted from TAPPI Standard Method T4l4M-49.
`internal Tearing Resistance of Paper. in testing certain plastic films, problems of
`reproducibility and interpretation of results are encountered which require special
`treatment to make the test method of most value. The test method is revised here
`specifically for use with plastic film and thin sheeting. For more complete
`explanation of certain aspects of the equipment, its calibration and adjustment,
`refer to TAPPI Standard Method T4l4m-49.
`The following additional references may be of interest in connection with this
`lest method:
`Painter, 6. V.. Chu. C. C.. and Morgan, H. M.. “Testing Textiles on the
`Elmendort‘ Tear Tester.” Textile Research Journal, TIUOA, Vol XX, No. 6, June
`1950. PD. 4l0—4l7.
`Elmendorf, A., “Strength Test for Paper," Paper, PPEXA, Vol 26. April 2|.
`I920. p. 302.
`3 Annual Book tJASTM Standards, Vol 10.02.
`‘Annual Book ofASTM Standards, Vol 08.01.
`
`D689 Test Method for Internal Tearing Resistance of
`Paper’
`D1004 Test Method for Initial Tear Resistance of Plastic
`Film and Sheeting‘
`D4000 Classification System for Specifying Plastic
`Materials‘
`
`3. Summary of Test Method
`
`3.1 The force in grams required to propagate tearing
`across a film or sheeting specimen is measured using a
`precisely calibrated pendulum device. Acting by gravity, the
`pendulum swings through an arc, tearing the specimen from
`a precut slit. The specimen is held on one side by the
`pendulum and on the other side by a stationary member.
`The loss in energy by the pendulum is indicated by a pointer.
`The scale indication is a function of the force required to tear
`the specimen.
`
`4. Significance and Use
`
`4.1 This test method is of value in ranking relative tearing
`resistance of various plastic films and thin sheeting of
`comparable thickness. Experience has shown the test to have
`its best reliability on relatively less extensible films and
`sheeting. Variable elongation and oblique tearing effects on
`the more extensible films preclude its use as a precise
`production control tool for these types of plastics. This test
`method should be used for specification acceptance testing
`only alter it has been demonstrated that the data for the
`particular material are acceptably reproducible. This test
`method should be used for service evaluation only after its
`usefulness for the particular application has been demon-
`strated with a number of different films.
`4.2 This test method has been widely used as one index of
`the tearing resistance of plastic film and thin sheeting used in
`packaging applications. While it may not always be possible
`to correlate film tearing data with its other mechanical or
`toughness properties,
`the apparatus of this test method
`provides a controlled means for
`tearing specimens at
`straining rates approximating some of those found in actual
`packaging service.
`4.3 Due to orientation during their manufacture, plastic
`films and sheeting frequently show marked anisotropy in
`their resistance to tearing. This is further complicated by the
`fact that some films elongate greatly during tearing, even at
`the relatively rapid rates of loading encountered in this test.
`The degree of this elongation is dependent in turn on film
`
`5 Annual Book qf/ISTM tfiandards, Vol l5.09.
`5 Annual Book ofASTM Standards, Vol 08.02.
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`BOREALIS EXHIBIT 1042
`
`

`
`ASTM D1922 ‘I3 — D?5‘l5L.D D53‘-I575 Nil] —
`
`ill}: D1922
`
`43 mm (I.7")
`Radius of Tour
`
`
`
`Precut Silt
`
`FIG. 1 Constant-Radius Test specimen for Tear Resistance Test
`
`orientation and the inherent mechanical properties of the
`polymer from which it is made. These factors make tear
`resistance of some films reproducible between sets of speci-
`mens to :5 % of the mean value, while others may show no
`better reproducibility than :50 %.
`4.4 Data obtained by this test method may supplement
`that from Test Method D1004, wherein the specimen is
`strained at a rate of 50 mm (2 in.) per min. However,
`specimen geometry and testing speed of the two test methods
`are dissimilar. The rate of tearing in this test method, while
`varying as a function of resistance to tear, is in the range of
`from 7.6 to 46 m (300 to 1800 in.)/min.
`4.5 There is not a direct,
`linear relationship between
`tearing force and specimen thickness. Data from this test
`method are expressed as tearing force in millinewtons (or
`grams-force, if desired), with specimen thickness also re-
`ported. But sets of data from specimens of dissimilar
`thickness are usually not comparable. Therefore, only data at
`the same thickness can be compared.
`4.6 For many materials, there may be a specification that
`requires the use of this test method, but with some proce-
`dural modifications that take precedence when adhering to
`the specification. Therefore, it is advisable to refer to that
`material specification before using this test method. Table 1
`of Classification System D 4000 lists the ASTM materials
`standards that currently exist.
`
`5. Apparatus
`
`5.l Pendulum Impulse Type Testing Apparatus,’ con-
`sisting of the following:
`5.1.1 Stationary Clamp.
`5.l.2 Movable Clamp, carried on a pendulum, preferably
`formed by a sector of a wheel or circle, free to swing on a ball
`bearing or other substantially frictionless bearing.
`
`5.1.3 Stop Catch, for holding the pendulum in a raised
`position and for releasing it instantaneously.
`5.1.4 Indicating Device, for registering the maximum are
`through which the pendulum swings when released. The
`pendulum shall carry a circumferential scale, graduated from
`0 to I00 % of the machine capacity so as to read against the
`pointer the average force required to tear a specimen 43 mm
`(1.7 in.). The pointer and scale may be replaced by an
`electronic digital readout. Digital
`readouts are available
`which will give test results directly in millinewtons, directly
`in grams-force, or in percent of pendulum capacity. With the
`pendulum in its initial position ready for test, separate the
`two clamps by an interval of 2.54 mm (0.10 in.). So align
`them that the specimen clamped in them lies in a plane
`perpendicular to the plane of oscillation of the pendulum
`with the edges of the jaws gripping the specimen in a
`horizontal line, a perpendicular to which through the axis of
`suspension of the pendulum is 102.7 :1: 0.05 mm (4.044 t
`0.002 in.) in length and makes an angle of 27.5’ with the
`plane of the lilm specimen. The clamping surface in each jaw
`shall be at least 25.4 mm (1 in.) in width and at least 12.7
`mm (0.5 in.) in depth.
`5.1.5 Capacz'ty—lnstruments of several capacities, 1960,
`3920, 7840, 15 600, 31 360, 62 720 mNs (200, 400, 800,
`1600, 3 200, 6 400 gf), and perhaps others are available.
`These capacities can be achieved by individual instruments,
`interchangeable pendulum sectors, or augmenting weights.
`5.2 Template, Die. or Shear-Type Cutler,‘ for cutting
`specimens.
`5.3 Razor Blades, single-edged,
`where a template is used.
`5.4 Thickness-Measuring Device—A suitable micrometer,
`or other thickness gage, reading to 0.0025 mm (0.000! in.)
`for measuring the thickness of test specimens. The pressure
`exerted by the gage on the specimen being measured shall be
`between 160 and 185 kPa (23 and 27 psi), as prescribed in
`Method C of Test Methods D 374.
`
`for cutting specimens
`
`6. Test Specimens
`l, to
`6.1 Test specimens shall be cut, as shown in Fig.
`form a constant-radius testing length. This shall be the
`preferred or referee specimen type since its geometry auto-
`matically compensates for the problem of oblique tearing
`(Notes 1 and 2). Alternatively, specimens shall be cut to form
`a rectangle 76 mm (3 in.) or more in width by 63 mm (2.5
`in.)
`in length and plainly marked to denote intended
`direction of tear. The 63-mm specimen dimension shall be
`the direction of tear. Two sets of specimens shall be cut from
`each sample so that their sides are parallel to (I) the machine
`direction, and (2) the transverse direction, respectively, of the
`material being tested. Enough specimens shall be cut in each
`direction to provide a minimum of ten tear strength deter-
`minations.
`
`Nora l-Specimens having constant-radius testing lengths are de-
`signed to correct for oblique directional tearing encountered in certain
`anisotropic, elastomeric films, and nonrigid sheeting. For purposes of
`specimen selection, oblique tearing is defined as tearing in a curved or
`
`7 Equipment available from the Thwing-Albert instrument 00.. Philadelphia,
`
`‘The TA63 Sample Cutter. Catalog No. 98, from the Thwing-Albert Instru-
`ment Co., Philadelphia, PA l9l44, has been found satisfactory for cutting
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`
`ASTI1 D]r‘lEE ‘I3 — lJ?5'l5]rD U53liS?"l EB? —
`
`tilts n 1922
`
`straight line that deviates more than 9.5 mm (‘A in.) from the vertical
`line of intended tear.
`.
`NOTE 2.—Certain film and sheeting specimens showing oblique
`tearing may yield data of poor reproducibility because the axis of
`maximum orientation varies as much as 30' from the nominal machine
`direction. When this is suspected, the sample may be examined by
`crossed Polaroid plates to determine this direction of maximum
`orientation and the specimens out along the axis ofanisotropy for testing
`parallel and normal to it.
`
`6.2 Where a metal template is used, the film or sheeting
`shall be placed on a hard surface. The template shall be held
`over it and the specimens cut out using a single—edgcd razor
`
`6.3 When the specimen is cut out, a slit 20 mm (0.8 in.)
`deep may be made at the center of the edge perpendicular to
`the direction to be tested. This leaves exactly 43 mm (1 .7 in.)
`of tearing length between the end of the slit and the opposite
`edge of the specimen. This slit may be cut into the specimen
`after it has been placed in the testing apparatus.
`
`Nora 3—The pendulum apparatus may be fitted with a sharp-loaded
`knife to make this slit in the specimen after it has been clamped in the
`apparatus. The action of the knife must be such as to make a clean slit
`exactly 20 mm (0.8 in.) into the specimen from the edge.
`
`7. Adjustment of Apparatus
`7.l Pendulum Friction:
`7.1.1 Older Instruments—To check the pendulum swing
`for freedom from excess friction,
`level the apparatus and
`draw a pencil line on the base or stop mechanism 25.4 mm
`(1 in.) to the right of the edge of the sector stop. With the
`sector raised to its initial position and the pointer set against
`its stop, on releasing the sector and holding the stop down,
`the sector should make at least 20 complete oscillations
`before the edge of the sector that engages with the stop no
`longer passes to the left of the pencil line. Otherwise, oil and
`adjust the bearing.
`7.1.2 Newer Instruments—ln recent years, a new type of
`frictionless bearing made of synthetic material has been used.
`This hearing will not necessarily allow the pendulum sector
`to make 20 complete oscillations as the older one did. This
`does not mean that there is excess friction in the pendulum
`swing. These newer bearings should not be oiled. Consult the
`instructions supplied with the instrument for guidance.
`7.2 Pointer Friction.-
`
`Z.2.l Check the pointer friction as follows: Set the pointer
`at zero reading on the scale before releasing the sector, and
`after release see that the pointer is not pushed more than
`three scale divisions beyond zero. A reading of more than
`three divisions indicates excessive pointer fiiction and the
`pointer should be removed, the bearing wiped clean, and a
`trace of oil or petroleum jelly applied. When the pointer
`friction has been reduced, finally adjust the pointer stop.
`7.3 Pointer Zero Reading—To check the pointer for its
`zero point, level the apparatus so that, with the sector free,
`the line on the sector
`indicating the vertical point of
`suspension coincides with a corresponding point on the base
`of the apparatus, usually placed on the stop mechanism.
`After leveling, operate the apparatus several
`times with
`nothing in the jaws,
`the movable jaw being closed,
`to
`ascertain whether the pointer registers zero with no load. If
`
`by means of the pointer stop thumb screw until a zero
`reading is obtained.
`
`8. Verification of Scale
`
`8.1 The scale may be verified either by the procedure
`described in Test Method D 689 and repeated here, or by the
`method which uses the elmendorf check weights obtainable
`from the manufacturer. The method in Test Method D 689
`is relatively time-consuming and complicated. The check
`weight method is relatively simple.
`8.2 ASTM Test Method D 689 Procedure.-
`8.2.l To verify the scale, first mark the center of gravity of
`the weight (including means of attaching) by a punched dot
`on the face of the weight. Then clamp a known weight in
`grams, W. to the radial edge of the sector beneath the jaws.
`8.2.2 Raise and set the sector as for tearing a specimen
`and, by means of a suitable scale. measure the height in
`centimetres, h, of the center of gravity of the weight above
`the surface upon which the apparatus rests. Then release the
`sector, allow it
`to swing, and note the pointer reading.
`Without touching the pointer, raise the sector until the edge
`of the pointer just meets with its stop, in which position
`again determine the height in centimetres, H, of the center of
`gravity of the weight above the surface.
`8.2.3 The work done is W(H — h) gram-centimetres. The
`pointer reading noted above should be the same as that
`calculated as follows:
`
`W(H — h)/ I 37.6
`
`8.2.4 Five weights from 75 to 400 g form a suitable range
`for calibration of the apparatus, one or more being clamped
`on the edge of the sector in different positions. Calculate the
`work done in raising each and add together.
`8.2.5 Make a record of deviations of the pointer from the
`calculated readings and make corresponding corrections in
`the test results at the proper points on the scale.
`8.2.6 It is unnecessary to repeat the calibration of the
`instrument provided it is kept in adjustment and no parts
`become changed or worn.
`8.3 Check Weight Method."
`8.3.1 Use a set of three check weights calibrated for scale
`values of 20, 50, and 80 % of the pendulum capacity. Sets of
`check weights of these values are available for each pen-
`dulum capacity. These weights should be so constructed that
`each weight can be inserted in the clamps by the procedure
`used for a test specimen.
`8.3.2 With the pendulum in the raised position, open the
`clamp of the pendulum. Slide the tang of the weight into
`position, and fasten it securely into the clamp. The body of
`the weight must be beneath the clamp. Depress the pen-
`dulum stop, thus releasing the pendulum. Hold down the
`stop until alter the tea: is completed and catch the pendulum
`on the return swing. Read the indicating device to the nearest
`division.
`8.3.3 Repeat
`weights.
`
`this procedure with each of the check
`
`’ Elmendorf calibration check weights are available from the Thwing-Albert
`Instrument Co., Philadelphia, PA l9l44. Use of these weights will permit direct
`calibration of the apparatus in a shorter time.
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`
`AST11 ]>]r‘iEE ‘13 — 0759510 12153115613 3T"! —
`
`$111 D1922
`
`9. Conditioning
`
`9.1 Conditt'om'ng—-Condition the test specimens at 23 ac
`2'C (73.4 :1: 3.6‘F) and 50 :1: 5 % relative humidity for not
`less than 40 h prior to test in accordance with Procedure A of
`Practice D 618 for these tests where conditioning is required.
`In cases of disagreement,
`the tolerances shall be :1:1'C
`(:1:1.8'F) and :1:2 % relative humidity.
`9.2 Test Conditians—Conduct tests in the standard labo-
`ratory atmosphere of 23 : 2°C (73.4 :1: 3.617) and 50 :1: 5 %
`relative humidity, unless otherwise specified in the test
`method. In cases of disagreement, the tolerances shall be
`:l'C (:t1.8°F) and :2 % relative humidity.
`
`10. Procedure
`
`10.1 Test not less than ten specimens in each of the
`principal film or sheeting directions. Measure and record the
`thickness of each specimen as the average of three readings
`across its center in the direction in which it is to be torn.
`Read the thickness to a precision of 0.0025 mm (0.0001 in.)
`or better except for sheeting greater than 0.25 mm (10 mils)
`thickness, which read to a precision of 0.025 mm (0.001 in.)
`or better.
`
`10.2 With the pendulum in its raised position, place the
`specimen midway in the clamps so that its upper edge is
`parallel to the top of the clamps and the initial slit (if it was
`made when the specimen was cut) is at the bottom of and
`between the clamps at right angles to their top.
`10.3 Slit the firmly clamped specimen with the sharp
`spring-loaded knife if it has not been slit during cutting. Lay
`the upper,
`testing portion of the specimen over in the
`direction of the pendulum pivot.
`Nora 4—The work done in tearing a specimen includes a certain
`amount of work to bend continuously the film or sheeting as it is torn, to
`provide for the rubbing of the torn edges of the specimen together, and
`to lift the specimen against the force of gravity. Consequently, it is
`necessary to specify certain empirical requirements for both the appa-
`ratus and the method to lceep the additional work not used for tearing to
`approximately a definite quantity.
`
`10.4 Release the sector stop and tear the specimen. As the
`sector completes its return swing, catch it with the thumb
`and forefinger of the lefl hand, being careful not to disturb
`the position of the pointer.
`10.5 Examine the specimen. If it tore through the con-
`stant-radius section within an approximate angle of 60° on
`either side of the vertical line of intended tear, record the
`pointer reading to the nearest 0.5 unit. If the line of tear was
`more than approximately 60' from the vertical, reject the
`reading and test an extra specimen in its place. If rectangular
`specimens are tested, reject all specimens that tear obliquely
`more than 9.5 mm (3/s in.) from the vertical line of intended
`tear. Test extra specimens to replace those rejected. When
`oblique tearing is frequent, the test may be performed along
`and normal to the axis of maximum orientation (see Note 2)
`instead of along machine and transverse directions.
`
`Nora 5—ln addition to tearing in a curved or oblique direction,
`some specimens may elongate along the line of tear to such an extent
`that the actual
`tearing length may be considerably more than the
`standard 43-mm (1.7-in.) dimension. As the degree or length of this
`elongation cannot be measured, the data cannot be corrected for its
`effect. However, when this has occuned, a note should be included in
`the report of data. This elongation tendency of certain films may cause
`poorer reproducibility.
`
`NOTE 6—The maximum accuracy of the pendulum apparatus lies in
`the scale range between 20 and 60. When thin specimens are being
`tested,
`it may be advisable to test enough specimens sandwiched
`together to produce a scale reading between 20 and 60. However, certain
`specimens in the same sandwich may tear obliquely in opposite
`directions, which may lead to falsely high results When this tearing
`behavior is encountered, single specimens must be tested, even though
`scale readings may be in the range below 20. iftearing loads are in excess
`of 60, the augmenting weight attachment may be used to double the
`capacity of the apparatus or a higher capacity pendulum may be used.
`For thin film, it is recommended that single specimens and a lower
`capacity tester be used rather than several specimens and a higher
`capacity machine. if the scale reading is below 10 on a 200 g pendulum,
`multiple plies may be used. The number of plies used should be the
`number required to bring the reading above 10.
`
`ll. Calculation
`
`11.1 Calculate the average tearing force in milli-newtons
`and, if desired, in grams-force as follows:
`11.1.1 If the standard 1600-gf instrument with 0-100 scale
`is used:
`
`Average tearing ram’ mN = 16 X 9.81 x ave:-‘age scale readi
`
`16 X average scale reading
`It
`
`Average tearing force, gf =
`
`where:
`
`n = 1, or number of plies, if used. See Note 6.
`11.1.2 If an instrument of different grams-force capacity
`with 0-100 scale is used:
`
`Average tearing force, mN
`
`= 16 X 9.81 X average scale reading X gt-capacity
`n X 1600 gt‘
`
`Average tearing force, gt‘
`
`where:
`
`16 X average scale reading X gt-capacity
`nx l600gf
`
`n = 1, or number of plies, if used. See Note 6.
`11.1.3 If an instrument has an S1 metric scale (for
`example, 0-1000 graduations):
`Average tearing force, mN
`
`3 16 X average scale reading X capacity, N
`n X 15.7 N
`
`Average tearing force. gt‘
`
`a 16 x average scale reading X capacity, N
`9.81 X n X 15.7 N
`
`where:
`
`n = 1, or number of plies, if used. See Note 6.
`11.1.4 If an instrument has a direct-reading scale (for
`example, digital read-out) in millinewtons:
`
`Average tearing force, mN =
`
`Average tearing force, gf = "ems;
`fading
`
`where:
`
`n = 1, or number of plies, if used. See Note 6.
`11.1.5 If an instrument has a direct-reading scale (for
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`
`ASTH D]a"iEE '13 — |J‘?5"l5]iD 0531156]: E35 —
`
`iilii o 1922
`
`
`
`Average tearing force, mN =
`
`average scale reading X 9.81
`n
`
`_
`.
`
`Average tearing force, gf =- -:mE—-—-éave$2]: madmg
`
`where:
`rt = l, or number of plies, if used. See Note 6.
`A direct proportionality may not always exist between
`tearing force and specimen thickness. Therefore, this test
`method provides for reporting data in millinewtons, or, if
`desired, grams of force required to propagate tearing with
`specimen thickness reported separately.
`11.2 Calculate the arthmetic mean, X, tearing resistance
`in each principal direction of the film or sheeting.
`11.3 Calculate the standard deviation of the tearing resis-
`tance in each principal direction to two significant figures as
`f°"°ws:
`
`5 = ~i(EX’ " H5)/(H - 1)
`
`when;
`s = estimated standard deviation,
`X = value of a single observation,
`number of observations, and
`X = arithmetic mean of the set of observations.
`11.4 The average, standard deviation, maximum, and
`minimum values of the tearing resistance may be obtained
`from the digital readout device, if applicable.
`
`12. Report
`12.1 Report the following information:
`12.1.1 Complete identification of the sample tested in-
`
`eluding source, manufacturer's name and code number,
`method of fabrication, roll or lot number, and date received
`or made,
`12.1.2 Type and direction of specimens tested: rectan-
`gular or constant radius, parallel or normal to the machine
`direction of the film. If tests were performed with reference
`to an axis of maximum orientation that did not coincide
`with the machine or transverse direction of the film, the
`report should also include the location of this axis relative to
`the latter directions,
`12.1.3 Number of specimens tested at one time, and the
`number tested in each principal direction of the film,
`12.1.4 Average, maximum, and minimum values for
`specimen thickness and for machine and transverse tearing
`resistance (if data are obtained from specimens in both
`principal directions), expressed in millinewtons, or grams-
`force, if desired to the nearest whole number,
`12.1.5 Standard deviation from the average(s) of the
`tearing resistance in the machine and transverse directions, if
`both directions are tested, and
`12.1.6 Capacity of the tester.
`
`13. Precision and Bias
`
`13.1 Work is in progress to establish the precision of this
`test method.
`13.2 Bias cannot be determined as there is no absolute
`standard that can be used as a reference of any such patent
`rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely
`their own responsibility.
`
`The American society for Testing and Materials takes no position respecting the validity ol any patent rights asserted In connection
`with any item mentioned in this standard. Users oi this standard are expressly emrised that determination of the validity at any such
`patent rights, and the risk ol inirlngement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
`
`This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every live years and
`I! not revised, either reepproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision oi this standard or lor additional standards
`and should be addressed to ASYM Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting oi the responsible
`technical committee, which you may attend. if you ieei that your comments have not received a lair hearing you should make your
`views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, 1918 Race St.. Philadelphia. PA 19103.
`
`Page 5 of 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket