throbber
ARTICLEBORGEN ET ALINFLUENCE OF GENDER AND FOOD ON SODIUM OXYBATEPHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS
`
`
`
`
`
`The Influence of Gender and Food on the
`Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Oxybate
`Oral Solution in Healthy Subjects
`
`Lowell A. Borgen, PhD, Richard Okerholm, PhD,
`Dennis Morrison, DO, and Allen Lai, PhD
`
`Sodium oxybate (Xyrem®; gamma-hydroxybutyrate) oral so-
`lution was recently approved in the United States for the
`treatment of cataplexy in patients with narcolepsy. Two sin-
`gle-center, randomized, open-label studies in healthy volun-
`teers receiving single oral 4.5-g doses of sodium oxybate eval-
`uated effects of (1) gender on oxybate pharmacokinetics and
`(2) food on its oral bioavailability. In the latter study, one dose
`was administered after an overnight fast, another after a high-
`fat meal; 1 week separated treatments. Sodium oxybate
`pharmacokinetics was not significantly different between
`sexes. However, food significantly altered the bioavailability
`
`of oxybate by decreasing mean peak plasma concentration,
`increasing median time-to-peak concentration, and decreas-
`ing the area under the plasma concentration-time curve.
`Food did not affect elimination and urinary excretion of un-
`changed drug. No dose adjustment of sodium oxybate based
`on sex is indicated. Although significant food effects were ob-
`served, these are minimized in patients by the nocturnal dos-
`ing of sodium oxybate hours after the evening meal at a con-
`sistent time interval following food ingestion.
`Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2003;43:59-65
`©2003 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology
`
`Sodium oxybate (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) oral so-
`
`lution represents a novel approach to the
`pharmacotherapy of narcolepsy, a debilitating sleep
`disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepi-
`ness, cataplexy, sleep paralysis, hypnagogic hallucina-
`tions, and the disruption of normal sleep patterns.1 So-
`dium oxybate differs from other symptomatic
`treatments presently used for narcolepsy such as anti-
`depressants and stimulants in that it appears to act
`more directly on the disrupted sleep architecture char-
`acteristic of this disorder.2,3 Thus, although sodium
`oxybate does not fully normalize nocturnal sleep in
`narcoleptic patients, it has shown significant beneficial
`effects on both daytime and nighttime symptoms of
`
`Inc., Minnetonka, Minnesota (Dr. Borgen);
`From Orphan Medical,
`Okerholm & Associates, Palm City, Florida (Dr. Okerholm); Bio-Kinetic
`Clinical Applications, Springfield, Missouri (Dr. Morrison); and CPKD So-
`lutions, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina (Dr. Lai). Dr. Borgen is a fel-
`low of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology. Financial support
`for this study was provided by Orphan Medical, Inc., Minnetonka, Minne-
`sota. Submitted for publication July 25, 2002; revised version accepted
`October 27, 2002. Address for reprints: Lowell A. Borgen, PhD, Orphan
`Medical, Inc., 13911 Ridgedale Drive, Suite 250, Minnetonka, MN
`55305.
`DOI: 10.1177/0091270002239707
`
`J Clin Pharmacol 2003;43:59-65
`
`narcolepsy, particularly the symptom of cataplexy.3-11
`In July 2002, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
`approved sodium oxybate (as Xyrem® oral solution
`marketed by Orphan Medical, Inc.) for the treatment of
`cataplexy in narcoleptic patients. Used as an approved
`medication, gamma-hydroxybutyrate is a Schedule III
`drug; however, when used for illicit, nonmedical use
`(as GHB or its chemical analogs), it is classified as a
`Schedule I controlled substance.
`The oral pharmacokinetics of sodium oxybate has
`been assessed previously in healthy volunteers12 and in
`patients with narcolepsy13 as well as alcohol-dependent
`patients14 and patients with moderate or severe liver
`dysfunction.15 Overall, these studies have shown that
`the pharmacokinetics of oxybate in patients with
`narcolepsy is comparable to those in healthy subjects
`and in alcohol-dependent patients.12,13,16 While cirrho-
`sis modified the disposition kinetics of oxybate, it did
`not alter tolerability to the drug.14 These studies also in-
`dicated that oxybate is rapidly absorbed and has a half-
`life of approximately 1 hour.
`This short half-life of oxybate supports the proposal
`that the effects of sodium oxybate on daytime symp-
`toms are the result of the consolidation of nocturnal
`sleep.11 It also provides a pharmacokinetic basis for the
`
`59
`
`AMN1033
`IPR of Patent No. 8,772,306
`
`

`
`BORGEN ET AL
`
`clinical finding that a divided dosing schedule, with to-
`tal doses of 3 to 9 g sodium oxybate given in two por-
`tions at bedtime and 2.5 to 4 hours later, is most effec-
`tive in the treatment of narcolepsy.6,8,10,11 The
`development of the sodium oxybate oral solution for-
`mulation recognized the need for individualized dos-
`ing titration provided by a convenient liquid dosage
`form for the drug. The present studies were undertaken
`to describe the plasma pharmacokinetics of sodium
`oxybate oral solution in healthy males and females and
`to determine the effects of food on its oral
`bioavailability.
`
`METHODS
`
`Two randomized, open-label studies were conducted
`in healthy volunteers. One study evaluated the
`pharmacokinetics of a single dose of sodium oxybate
`oral solution in males and females; the other evaluated
`the oral bioavailability of sodium oxybate oral solution
`after an overnight fast and after a high-fat meal in a two-
`period, two-sequence, crossover design. The dose of
`sodium oxybate used in both studies was 4.5 g, which
`was chosen because it represents the maximum dose
`that is given in a single administration to patients with
`narcolepsy. Both studies were conducted at Bio-Kinetic
`Clinical Applications (Springfield, MO) after approval
`of the protocols and informed consent forms by the af-
`filiated institutional review board.
`
`Subjects
`
`For both studies, eligible subjects were nonsmoking
`male or female volunteers ages 18 to 55 years who were
`within 15% of their ideal body weight (according to
`1983 Metropolitan Life Insurance tables). They were
`deemed healthy based on physical examination, medi-
`cal history, 12-lead electrocardiogram, and clinical lab-
`oratory evaluations (hematology, serum chemistry, uri-
`nalysis, serum pregnancy test for females, and urine
`drug screen) performed at screening. Subjects were ex-
`cluded if they had known or suspected illicit drug use,
`hypersensitivity to sodium oxybate or related com-
`pounds, or any disease or condition that could affect
`absorption, distribution, metabolism, or elimination of
`sodium oxybate. Pregnant or nursing females were not
`admitted to either study, and women of childbearing
`potential were required to use adequate contraception.
`Subjects were required to have not used tobacco prod-
`ucts for 1 year, given blood or used investigational
`drugs within 30 days, given plasma within 14 days, or
`used any prescription or over-the-counter medication
`(excluding oral contraceptives) or alcohol within 48
`
`60 • J Clin Pharmacol 2003;43:59-65
`
`hours of dosing. All subjects gave written informed
`consent prior to participation in the studies.
`
`Study Designs and Procedures
`
`Gender study. Eighteen males and 18 females were
`chosen for the study; weight was matched as closely as
`possible (within ± 3 kg) between sexes. Subjects were
`required to enter the clinical research facility in the
`evening, approximately 3 hours before dosing with 4.5 g
`sodium oxybate oral solution (500 mg/mL; Orphan
`Medical, Inc.). Blood samples (5 mL) were collected be-
`fore dosing (0 hour); at 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 minutes af-
`ter dosing; and at 30-minute intervals thereafter until 8
`hours after dosing. A 25-mL urine aliquot was collected
`during the hour before dosing, and all urine was col-
`lected in the 8-hour period after dosing. Subjects re-
`ceived a light meal approximately 2 hours prior to dos-
`ing; thereafter, they did not receive any food until the 8-
`hour blood collection was completed or water or other
`fluids until 2 hours after dosing. Subjects remained in
`the study facility until 3 hours after the final 8-hour
`blood sample was obtained.
`Food Study. Eligible subjects were randomized to
`one of two treatment sequences. In one sequence, sub-
`jects received a 4.5-g sodium oxybate oral dosage after
`an overnight fast; after a 7-day washout, they received
`the same study medication 30 minutes after a standard-
`ized high-fat meal. The standard meal consisted of 2
`fried eggs, 2 pieces of bacon, 4 ounces of hash brown
`potatoes, 2 slices of buttered toast, 8 ounces of whole
`milk, and 8 ounces of orange juice. This meal repre-
`sents approximately 150 protein calories, 250 carbohy-
`drate calories, and 500 fat calories. In the other se-
`quence, subjects received the 4.5-g dose of sodium
`oxybate in the opposite order, first after the high-fat
`meal and then after an overnight fast.
`Each dose of sodium oxybate was administered at
`approximately 7 a.m. In each treatment period, 18 sub-
`jects received the study medication after an overnight
`fast and 18 after a high-fat meal. Blood (5 mL) was col-
`lected before dosing (0 hour); at 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60
`minutes after dosing; at 30-minute intervals thereafter
`until 8 hours after dosing; and at 9 and 10 hours after
`dosing. A 25-mL urine aliquot was collected during the
`hour before dosing, and all urine was collected in 2-
`hour segments during the 10-hour period after dosing.
`In each treatment phase, subjects were required to en-
`ter the research facility on the evening before dosing
`and remain there until after the final blood and urine
`collection (10 h after dosing). Subjects received a light
`meal in the evening; thereafter, they did not receive any
`food (apart from the high-fat breakfast if appropriate)
`
`AMN1033
`IPR of Patent No. 8,772,306
`
`

`
`INFLUENCE OF GENDER AND FOOD ON SODIUM OXYBATE
`
`until after the 4-hour blood sample was collected or
`water or other fluids in the 2-hour periods before and
`after dosing.
`Safety was assessed in both studies by monitoring
`vital signs and occurrence of adverse events through-
`out the study.
`
`Analysis of Plasma and Urine Samples
`
`Whole blood was centrifuged at 4°C for 10 minutes at
`3000 rpm within 15 minutes of collection into
`heparinized Vaccutainers. Plasma was pipetted into
`polypropylene tubes and frozen at –20°C. Urine was
`stored refrigerated or on wet ice until the collection in-
`terval was complete; then it was mixed, the volume
`was recorded, and a 25-mL aliquot was stored frozen at
`–20°C. Plasma and urine samples were shipped on dry
`ice to Covance Laboratories, Inc. (Madison, WI), where
`concentrations of oxybate were determined. For the as-
`say, 2.0 mL water was added to plasma or urine sam-
`ples (0.1-mL aliquots), and sodium oxybate and the in-
`ternal standard (2-hydroxyvalerate; Aldrich) were
`extracted with methanol. Oxybate was determined by a
`validated liquid chromatography atmospheric pres-
`sure ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/
`MS) assay with a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 5 μg/
`mL. The calibration curve was linear (r = 0.9952) over
`the relevant concentration range of 5 to 200 μg/mL.
`
`Pharmacokinetic Parameters
`
`Noncompartmental methods (WinNonlin, version 1.1)
`were used in the determination of pharmacokinetic pa-
`rameters, which were assessed from each subject’s
`plasma oxybate concentration versus time data for each
`dose. Pharmacokinetic endpoints were peak plasma con-
`centration of oxybate (Cmax), time from dosing to when
`Cmax was reached (tmax), area under the concentration-
`time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞), elimina-
`tion rate constant (λz), apparent elimination half-life
`(t1/2), plasma clearance (CL/F), renal clearance (CLR),
`and apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F).
`The Cmax and tmax were observed values, λz was calcu-
`lated by log-linear regression analysis of the terminal
`phase of the plasma oxybate concentration versus time
`decay curve, and t1/2 was calculated as 0.693/λz. AUC0-∞
`was obtained through summation of AUClast (area un-
`der the curve from time 0 to last measurable concentra-
`tion, calculated by the linear trapezoidal rule) and
`AUCext (estimated by taking the ratio of the last measur-
`able concentration and λz). CL/F was determined from
`the ratio of dose and AUC0-∞, CLR was computed from
`the ratio of the total amount excreted unchanged to
`
`Table I Demographic Characteristics
`of Study Populations
`
`Parameter
`
`Gender Study
`(n = 36)
`
`Food Study
`(n = 36)
`
`18/0
`Sex (male/female)
`Race (C/B/H/O)a
`16/0/1/1
`27
`Mean age (years)
`75
`Mean weight (kg)
`a. C, Caucasian; B, Black; H, Hispanic; O, Other.
`
`0/18
`16/0/1/1
`34
`73
`
`0/36
`34/0/2/0
`30
`66
`
`AUC0-∞, and Vz/F was calculated from dose divided by
`AUC0-∞ • λz.
`
`Statistical Analysis
`
`Pharmacokinetic data are presented as mean (median
`for tmax) and standard deviation (SD). The effect of gen-
`der on sodium oxybate pharmacokinetics was deter-
`mined by an unpaired t-test of the log-transformed
`AUC0-∞, log-transformed Cmax, CL/F, t1/2, the percentages
`of the dose recovered unchanged in urine, and CLR. The
`Wilcoxon rank-sum test (a nonparametric analysis)
`was performed on tmax.
`The effect of food on sodium oxybate pharmacoki-
`netics was determined by an analysis of variance
`(ANOVA), including effects for sequence, subject
`within sequence, treatment, and period, of the AUC0-∞
`and Cmax after logarithmic transformation and compu-
`tation of the 90% confidence interval (CI). The CIs were
`compared to the reference intervals of 0.80 to 1.25 for
`AUC0-∞ and 0.70 to 1.43 for Cmax for description of the ef-
`fect of administration with food on the bioavailability
`of sodium oxybate. In addition, tmax, λz, and t1/2 were an-
`alyzed for significant effects of food. After the treat-
`ments, tmax was also compared by a nonparametric
`analysis.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Study Populations
`
`Demographic information regarding subjects in each of
`the studies is summarized in Table I. Data from all 36
`subjects (18 males, 18 females; 18 to 55 years old and
`weighing 57 to 96 kg) who entered the gender study
`were included in the safety analysis and in the
`pharmacokinetic statistics. Two of the 36 subjects (both
`29-year-old females) who entered the food study did
`not complete the study, and data from these subjects
`were not included in the pharmacokinetic analysis.
`
`PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS
`
`61
`
`AMN1033
`IPR of Patent No. 8,772,306
`
`

`
`BORGEN ET AL
`
`Table II Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Oxybate
`in Healthy Males and Females
`
`Male
`(n = 18)
`
`Parameter
`AUC0-∞ (μg•h/mL)
`241 (81.7)
`Cmax (μg/mL)
`88.3 (21.4)
`a (h)
`1.00
`tmax
`0.65 (0.23)
`t1/2 (h)
`3.8 (1.3)
`CL/F (mL/min/kg)
`202 (61.4)
`Vz/F (mL/kg)
`3.1 (1.3)
`Urinary recovery (%)
`484 (185)
`CLR (mL/h)
`Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
`a. Median.
`
`Female
`(n = 18)
`
`233 (81.5)
`83.0 (18.7)
`1.00
`0.61 (0.12)
`4.2 (1.6)
`218 (86.6)
`3.1 (1.8)
`510 (276)
`
`One subject did not return for the second treatment pe-
`riod because of adverse events experienced during the
`first treatment period; the other did not return because
`of reasons unrelated to the study. Data from all 36 sub-
`jects in the food study were included in the safety
`analysis.
`
`Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Oxybate
`in Healthy Males and Females
`
`Plasma concentration versus times curves for oxybate
`in males and females are shown in Figure 1, and
`pharmacokinetic parameters are summarized in Table
`II. There was no difference in the systemic exposure to
`oxybate between male and female subjects, and there
`was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between male
`and female volunteers for any of the pharmacokinetic
`parameters assessed.
`Oxybate was rapidly absorbed and quickly elimi-
`nated. Concentrations above 5 μg/mL (the assay LOQ)
`were observed at the first sampling time (10 min), and
`concentrations were below 5 μg/mL by 4 hours after
`dosing in most subjects. Mean plasma oxybate concen-
`trations in males and females were superimposable be-
`tween 1 and 8 hours after dosing (Figure 1), and the
`mean pharmacokinetic parameters related to the rate of
`absorption (Cmax, tmax) were similar between the sexes
`(Table II). Plasma concentrations of oxybate climbed
`rapidly, peaking at an average of 1.25 hours and 1.14
`hours in males and females, respectively, and then de-
`clined in a multiphasic manner (Figure 1). The convex
`nature of the log-concentration versus time data ob-
`served when the dose was administered after an over-
`night fast indicated the presence of a saturable process
`in the elimination of oxybate. The mean elimination
`half-life (estimated from the last three concentrations
`
`62 • J Clin Pharmacol 2003;43:59-65
`
`Figure 1. Mean ( SEM) plasma oxybate (GHB) concentration-time
`profiles in healthy adult males (n = 18) and females (n = 18) following
`a single oral dose of 4.5 g sodium oxybate oral solution.
`
`above the assay LOQ and observed over an interval of
`1 h) was 0.65 hours in males and 0.61 hours in females.
`AUC0-∞, estimates of plasma oral clearance, and mean
`apparent volumes of distribution (Table II) were not
`different between males and females.
`Urinary excretion of unchanged oxybate was a mi-
`nor elimination pathway in both sexes. For both men
`and women, the average urinary recovery of un-
`changed drug was about 3% in the 8-hour period fol-
`lowing dosing. Urinary excretion ranged from 1% to
`7% among the 36 subjects.
`
`Effect of Food on the Bioavailability
`of Sodium Oxybate
`
`Plasma concentration versus times curves for oxybate
`after an overnight fast and after a high-fat meal are
`shown in Figure 2, and pharmacokinetic parameters
`are summarized in Table III. Food significantly affected
`systemic exposure to oxybate. By 1 hour after dosing
`with sodium oxybate, plasma concentrations of
`oxybate were twice as high in subjects who received
`the drug after an overnight fast than in those who re-
`ceived it after a high-fat meal (Figure 2). Absorption
`was slower and peak plasma concentrations were ob-
`served later when sodium oxybate was dosed after a
`high-fat meal.
`Peak plasma concentrations of oxybate were lower
`in all 34 evaluable subjects in the fed state. The mean
`Cmax values were significantly decreased more than
`twofold in the fed condition as compared to the fasted
`state (p < 0.05). Mean AUC0-∞ values were likewise sig-
`nificantly higher in the fasted versus fed state (p <
`
`AMN1033
`IPR of Patent No. 8,772,306
`
`

`
`INFLUENCE OF GENDER AND FOOD ON SODIUM OXYBATE
`
`Table III Effect of Food on the
`Pharmacokinetics of Sodium Oxybate
`
`Fasted State
`(n = 34)
`
`Parameter
`AUC0-∞ (μg•h/mL)
`289 (109)
`142 (34.2)
`Cmax (ng/mL)
`a (h)
`0.75
`tmax
`0.57 (0.30)
`t1/2 (h)
`3.7 (1.4)
`CL/F (mL/min/kg)
`192 (193)
`Vz/F (mL/kg)
`3.8 (2.0)
`Urinary recovery (%)
`490 (251)
`CLR (mL/h)
`Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
`a. Median.
`*p < 0.05. **p = 0.001.
`
`Fed State
`(n = 34)
`
`188* (80.0)
`60.1* (20.1)
`2.00**
`0.68 (0.22)
`6.2 (3.2)
`384 (324)
`3.5 (1.8)
`826 (462)
`
`0.05). The median tmax of 2.00 hours in the fed state was
`significantly later than the median tmax of 0.75 hours in
`the fasted state (p = 0.0001).
`Based on the logarithmic transformations of Cmax and
`AUC0-∞, the mean (90% CI) ratio of fed/fasted for Cmax
`was 0.41 (0.37-0.46) and for AUC0-∞ was 0.63 (0.57-
`0.69). The 90% CIs for both parameters were outside
`the reference ranges that indicate equivalence (0.70-
`1.43 for Cmax and 0.80-1.25 for AUC0-∞).
`In both the fed and fasted conditions, decline in
`plasma concentrations of oxybate proceeded in a
`multiphasic manner (Figure 2). The mean elimination
`half-life was 0.68 hours when the dose was adminis-
`tered after a high-fat meal and 0.57 hours when the
`dose was administered after an overnight fast, a
`nonsignificant difference. Estimates of plasma oral
`clearance, mean apparent volumes of distribution, and
`renal clearance were not significantly different be-
`tween the fed and fasted states.
`Urinary excretion of unchanged oxybate was a mi-
`nor elimination pathway in both conditions. Urinary
`recovery of unchanged oxybate over the 10-hour
`postdose period averaged 3.5% (range = 1.2%-8.8%)
`for fasted subjects and 3.8% (range = 0.6%-11.0%) for
`fed subjects. Most of the urinary excretion occurred in
`the first 6 hours after dosing. Although the fraction ex-
`creted unchanged was unaffected by the treatments, re-
`nal clearance tended to be slightly higher when the
`dose was administered after a high-fat meal (Table III).
`
`Safety
`
`A total of 10 adverse events, including nausea, head-
`aches, hot flash, and itching, were reported by 8 of the
`36 volunteers during the gender study; most (70%)
`
`Figure 2. Mean (± SEM) plasma oxybate (GHB) concentration-time
`profiles in healthy adult females (n = 34) following a single oral dose
`of 4.5 g sodium oxybate oral solution under fasted and fed
`conditions.
`
`were experienced by females. A total of 86 adverse
`events, most commonly vomiting, nausea, and various
`CNS symptoms, were reported by 31 of the 36 female
`volunteers in the food effect study; most (79%) were re-
`ported when sodium oxybate was administered after
`an overnight fast. None of the adverse experiences in
`either study was classified as serious. One subject dis-
`continued the food effect study prematurely because of
`multiple nonserious adverse events experienced dur-
`ing the first treatment period in which she had received
`the drug after an overnight fast.
`Vital signs including measurements of blood pres-
`sure, heart rate, and respiratory rate were recorded
`within 1 hour before dosing and at 2, 6, and 10 hours af-
`ter the dose in each treatment period. No clinically sig-
`nificant changes in vital signs from baseline values
`were observed during either study.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`Sodium oxybate oral solution is the first drug approved
`in the United States for the treatment of cataplexy in
`patients with narcolepsy. The maximum recom-
`mended daily dose is 9 g, in divided portions of 4.5 g
`given at bedtime and 2.5 to 4 hours later. This unusual
`dose regimen is based empirically on several early
`narcolepsy clinical trials conducted in Canada, the
`Netherlands, and the United States.4,6,8,9 From a
`pharmacokinetic perspective, dividing the nightly so-
`dium oxybate dose is rational because the elimination
`half-life of oxybate in narcoleptic patients is less than 1
`hour.13 The studies presented herein confirm the rapid
`elimination of oxybate after ingestion of the maximum
`recommended 4.5-g dose portion of sodium oxybate
`oral solution. Also, these studies extend findings from
`
`PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS
`
`63
`
`AMN1033
`IPR of Patent No. 8,772,306
`
`

`
`BORGEN ET AL
`
`clinical studies that sodium oxybate oral solution at
`recommended dosages is safe and well tolerated given
`that only 1 of the 72 healthy subjects in the two trials
`failed to complete the studies due to the occurrence of
`adverse effects.
`Oxybate is rapidly absorbed following ingestion of
`sodium oxybate oral solution. The mean time to
`achieve peak plasma oxybate concentration ranged
`from 45 minutes to 2 hours across different groups in
`the studies presented herein and was largest in the
`group receiving a high-fat meal. While the absorption
`characteristics of sodium oxybate were similar in
`males and females, they were significantly influenced
`by food, which delayed the absorption of oxybate on
`average by more than an hour compared to the fasted
`state. The significantly reduced bioavailability of
`oxybate when sodium oxybate oral solution was in-
`gested after a high-fat meal suggests that ingestion on
`an empty stomach will produce maximal systemic ex-
`posure. The effect of a high-protein or high-fiber meal
`has not been reported. Similarly, the effects of other
`agents that alter gastric motility or pH on oxybate
`bioavailability have not been reported. In patients with
`narcolepsy, the recommended nocturnal dosing gener-
`ally begins several hours after the evening meal, which
`should ameliorate any major food effects on the
`bioavailability of the drug.
`Others have reported that the absorption character-
`istics of sodium oxybate can also be influenced by
`dose, with tmax increasing as the dose increases, indicat-
`ing a capacity-limited absorption.12 Similar findings
`have been observed in our studies16 of sodium oxybate
`oral solution, in which the tmax value following a 2.25-g
`dose was approximately 0.9 hours and, after a 4.5-g
`dose, approximately 1.2 hours,16 consistent with the
`tmax observed in the gender study reported herein (1.25
`and 1.14 h in males and females, respectively). In this
`respect, peak plasma concentrations of oxybate were
`also reached somewhat earlier in patients with
`narcolepsy who received 3 g sodium oxybate (0.67 h).13
`The average apparent volume of distribution of
`oxybate divided by absolute bioavailability (Vz/F)
`ranged between 190 and 384 mL/kg across the studies
`reported herein and was not significantly affected by
`gender or food, although it was highest in the subjects
`fed a high-fat meal. These values were similar to those
`reported for healthy volunteers (335 mL/kg) and
`cirrhotic patients without and with ascites (198 and
`285 mL/kg, respectively).15
`Nonlinear elimination pharmacokinetics and
`capacity-limited disposition kinetics have also been
`described previously.17 Plasma clearance of oxybate
`has been shown to decrease as the oral dose of sodium
`
`64 • J Clin Pharmacol 2003;43:59-65
`
`oxybate increases.12,14 Similar findings have been ob-
`served in our studies of sodium oxybate oral solution,
`in which the mean oral plasma clearance for oxybate
`was 6.6 mL/min/kg at the lower end of the therapeutic
`dose range (4.5 g in 2 × 2.25-g portions given 4 h apart)
`and almost 50% less (3.6 mL/min/kg) at the maximum
`recommended dose (9 g in 2 × 4.5-g portions given 4 h
`apart).16 Plasma clearance of oxybate in the present
`studies ranged between 3.7 and 6.2 mL/min/kg and
`was not significantly affected by gender or food.
`Oxybate undergoes rapid elimination, with the half-
`life values in the present studies being approximately
`35 to 40 minutes, with no significant effects of gender
`or food. These are consistent with values reported else-
`where, and although a 40% increase in the mean appar-
`ent elimination half-life has been observed following
`the high versus low therapeutic dose range of sodium
`oxybate oral solution,16 this is not clinically relevant.
`As shown in the present studies, plasma levels of
`oxybate are negligible by 6 hours after the ingestion of
`4.5 g sodium oxybate oral solution in both males and fe-
`males and after an overnight fast or high-fat meal. Over-
`all, no accumulation of oxybate is expected with its
`nocturnal divided dosing schedule in patients. Consis-
`tent with biotransformation of oxybate to carbon diox-
`ide being the major mechanism of its clearance, recov-
`ery of unchanged drug was negligible in the present
`studies (< 4%). Renal clearance was unaffected by gen-
`der or food.
`The adverse events observed in this study are con-
`sistent with those observed in Phase 3 clinical trials.18
`The incidence of adverse events tended to be higher in
`females than males. Since males were somewhat
`heavier than females, this may be related to a higher
`mg/kg dose in the females. Likewise, all subjects in the
`food study were females, and most of the adverse
`events occurred after ingestion of the drug following an
`overnight fast. Since the bioavailability was lower
`when oxybate was ingested immediately after a meal,
`there were fewer adverse events compared to the inges-
`tion of oxybate in a fasted state.
`In summary, no dose adjustment based on gender is
`warranted. Although food significantly reduces sys-
`temic exposure to oxybate, this effect is likely to be
`minimal in patients if they follow the recommended
`dose schedule of taking the first dose of sodium
`oxybate oral solution at bedtime, which is usually sev-
`eral hours after their evening meal.
`
`We wish to acknowledge the analytical assistance of Glenn
`Hanson and his staff at Covance Laboratories, Dale Bourg and the
`clinical staff of Bio-Kinetic Clinical Applications, and the help of Dr.
`Joyce Willetts in preparation of the manuscript. The studies were
`funded by Orphan Medical, Inc.
`
`AMN1033
`IPR of Patent No. 8,772,306
`
`

`
`INFLUENCE OF GENDER AND FOOD ON SODIUM OXYBATE
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Scrima L: An etiology of narcolepsy-cataplexy and a proposed
`cataplexy neuromechanism. Int J Neurosci 1981;15:69-86.
`2. Mitler MM, Aldrich MS, Koob GF, Zarcone VP: Narcolepsy and its
`treatment with stimulants. Sleep 1994;17:352-371.
`3. Broughton R, Mamalek M: Effects of nocturnal gamma-
`hydroxybutyrate on sleep/waking patterns in narcolepsy-cataplexy. J
`Canadien Des Sciences Neurologique 1980;7:23-30.
`4. Broughton R, Mamelak M: The treatment of narcolepsy-cataplexy
`with nocturnal gamma-hydroxybutyrate. J Canadien Des Sciences
`Neurologique 1979;6:1-6.
`5. Bedard M-A, Montplaisir J, Godbout R, Lapierre O: Nocturnal
`gamma-hydroxybutyrate effect on periodic leg movements and sleep
`organization of narcoleptic patients. Clin Neuropharm 1989;12:29-
`36.
`6. Lammers GJ, Arends J, Declerck AC, Ferrari MD, Schouwink G,
`Troost J: Gammahydroxybutyrate and narcolepsy: a double-blind
`placebo-controlled study. Sleep 1993;16:216-220.
`7. Mamelak M, Webster P: Treatment of narcolepsy and sleep apnea
`with gamma-hydroxybutyrate: a clinical and polysomnographic case
`study. Sleep 1981;4:105-111.
`8. Mamelak M, Scharf MB, Woods M: Treatment of narcolepsy with
`γ-hydroxybutyrate: a review of clinical and sleep laboratory findings.
`Sleep 1986;9:285-289.
`9. Scharf M, Brown D, Woods M, Brown L, Hirschowitz J: The effects
`and effectiveness of γ-hydroxybutyrate in patients with narcolepsy. J
`Clin Psychiatry 1985;46:222-225.
`10. Scrima L, Hartman PG, Johnson FH, Hiller FC: Efficacy of gamma-
`hydroxybutrate versus placebo in treating narcolepsy-cataplexy:
`double-blind subjective measured. Biol Psychiatry 1989;26:331-343.
`
`11. Scrima L, Hartman PG, Johnson FH, Thomas EE, Hiller FC: The
`effects of γ-hydroxybutyrate on the sleep of narcolepsy patients: a
`double blind study. Sleep 1990;13:479-490.
`12. Palatini P, Tedeschi L, Frison G, Padrini R, Zordan R, Gallimberti
`L, et al: Dose-dependent absorption and elimination of gamma-
`hydroxybutyric acid in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol
`1993;45:353-356.
`13. Scharf MB, Lai AA, Branigan B, Stover R, Berkowitz DB:
`Pharmacokinetics of gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB) in narcoleptic
`patients. Sleep 1998;21:507-514.
`14. Ferrara SD, Zotti S, Tedeschi L, Frison G, Castagna F, Gallimberti
`L, et al: Pharmacokinetics of γ-hydroxybutyric acid in alcohol de-
`pendent patients after single and repeated oral doses. Brit J Clin
`Pharmacol 1992;34:231-235.
`15. Ferrara SD, Tedeschi L, Frison G, Orlando R, Mazzo M, Zordan R,
`et al: Effect of moderate or severe liver dysfunction on the
`pharmacokinetics of γ-hydroxybutyric acid. Eur J Clin Pharmacol
`1996;50:305-310.
`16. Borgen L, Lane E, Lai A: Xyrem® (sodium oxybate): a study of
`dose proportionality in healthy human subjects [abstract]. J Clin
`Pharmacol 2000;40:1053.
`17. Palatini P, Ferrara SD: Pharmacokinetics of γ-hydroxybutyric
`acid. Alcologia 1996;8:185-191.
`18. The U.S. Xyrem Multicenter Study Group: A randomized, double
`blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial comparing the effects of
`three doses of orally administered sodium oxybate with placebo for
`the treatment of narcolepsy. Sleep 2002;25:42-49.
`
`PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS
`
`65
`
`AMN1033
`IPR of Patent No. 8,772,306

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket