throbber
From the Department of Neurology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences
`Center, Oklahoma City.
`Received October 8, 1999. Accepted in final form December 10, 1999.
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Neil R. Holland, 711
`S.L. Young Boulevard, Suite 215, Oklahoma City, OK 73104-5021; e-mail:
`neil-holland@ouhsc.edu
`
`Copyright © 2000 by the American Academy of Neurology
`
`References
`1. Fiske DN, McCoy HE, Kitchens CS. Zinc-induced sideroblastic anemia.
`Report of a case, review of the literature and description of the hemato-
`logic syndrome. Am J Hematol 1994;46:147–150.
`2. Schiffer RB. Zinc and multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1994;44:1987–1988.
`3. Stein EC, Schiffer RB, Hall WJ, Young N. Multiple sclerosis and the
`workplace: report of an industry-based cluster. Neurology 1987;37:1672–
`1677.
`4. Hader WJ, Irvine DG, Schiefer HB. A cluster-focus of multiple sclerosis
`at Henribourg, Saskatchewan. Can J Neurol Sci 1990;17:391–394.
`5. Irvine DG, Schiefer HB, Hader WJ. Geotoxicology of multiple sclerosis:
`the Henribourg, Saskatchewan, cluster focus. I. The water. Sci Total
`Environ 1989;84:45–59.
`6. Irvine DG, Schiefer HB, Hader WJ. Geotoxicology of multiple sclerosis:
`the Henribourg, Saskatchewan, cluster focus. II. The soil. Sci Total En-
`viron 1988;77:175–188.
`
`␥-Hydroxybutyric acid for alcohol-sensitive
`myoclonus with dystonia
`A. Priori, MD, PhD; L. Bertolasi, MD; A. Pesenti, MD;
`A. Cappellari, MD; and S. Barbieri, MD, PhD
`
`Alcohol-sensitive myoclonus can be associated with dystonic
`spasms.1 Conventional treatments and anticonvulsants occasionally
`produce some benefit, but not comparable with the improvement
`induced by alcohol.1 We report a patient with alcohol-sensitive myoc-
`lonus and dystonia who had a consistent and substantial benefit
`from oral ␥-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB). Oral GHB is a drug that is
`effective both in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal2,3 and in main-
`taining abstinence from alcohol.4
`Case report. A 37-year-old man was evaluated for severe dis-
`abling myoclonic jerks of the upper limbs, axial muscles, neck and
`cranial muscles, which were associated with dystonic spasms
`of the upper limbs and of the neck muscles. According to the
`Chadwick–Marsden Evaluation Scale for myoclonus,5,6 the pa-
`tient’s score was 26 points. The hyperkinesias were not stimulus
`sensitive. They worsened under emotional stress and during the
`day, but the patient could control involuntary movements almost
`completely for a few hours after consumption of more than one
`liter of beer. The patient’s clinical picture has been stable for the
`last 20 years. In the past, the patient was treated with the follow-
`ing drugs with little or no benefit: sulpiride, thioridazine, alprazo-
`lam, diazepam, clonidine, valproate, and clonazepam. Flunitrazepam
`and trihexyphenidyl produced some benefit, but the patient had two
`episodes of atrial fibrillation, which contraindicated anticholinergics,
`and flunitrazepam induced unacceptable sedation at the effective
`dose. The patient had had his symptoms since childhood. His parents
`reported that he had a difficult and prolonged delivery and had a
`“paretic upper limb” during childhood. Family history revealed that
`two aunts had been affected by “tics.”
`The patient’s neurologic examination did not show any abnor-
`malities besides the involuntary movements. There were no cogni-
`tive or major psychiatric disturbances. Results of blood tests were
`normal (including screening for Wilson’s disease and acanthocyte
`count). EEG, somatosensory evoked potentials, brainstem audi-
`tory evoked responses, and motor potentials evoked by transcra-
`nial magnetic brain stimulation were normal. Electromyography
`showed bursts with a duration of 80 to 300 msec in the affected
`muscles. CT and MRI of the brain were normal.
`The patient was treated with a progressively increasing dose of
`GHB (Alcover, Laboratorio Farmaceutico CT, Sanremo, Italy),
`starting from 1.575 g/day divided into four doses. At the dose of
`6.125 g/day, the patient had a consistent and substantial reduc-
`tion of involuntary movements (Chadwick–Marsden Scale score,
`8), which he referred to as comparable with the effect produced by
`alcohol but with no side effects. The patient reported a subjective
`average improvement of approximately 80%. Within 1 hour after
`each dose the involuntary movements disappeared almost com-
`pletely. Execution of daily activities, social relationships, sexual
`
`1706 NEUROLOGY 54 April (2 of 2) 2000
`
`Figure. (A) The patient’s signature before ␥-hydroxybutyric
`acid (GHB) treatment was unreadable. (B) The patient’s
`signature (only the first name for privacy) during GHB
`treatment is clearly readable.
`
`activity, and mood also improved. Writing was almost impossible
`before GHB treatment, but the patient was able to write quite
`clearly afterward (figure). After 4 months the therapeutic benefit
`is unchanged and there are no side effects.
`Discussion. Our patient had severe, disabling alcohol-sensitive
`myoclonus with dystonia, which responded very poorly to previous
`conventional treatments. Both conditions, however, were relieved
`markedly by GHB at a dose of 6.125 g/day. GHB is a drug that
`was introduced approximately 40 years ago, and in recent years
`has become widely used in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal
`and in maintaining abstinence from alcohol.2-4 Some of its actions
`probably involve changes at the level of dopaminergic pathways in
`the basal ganglia and, more importantly, are mediated by specific
`receptors in the brain.7 Although the drug is not devoid of side
`effects, and there are possible risks of overdose and abuse,3 GHB
`is safe and well tolerated when used properly for prolonged peri-
`ods. The efficacy of GHB in the management of alcohol depen-
`dence is probably due to the close similarity of the actions exerted
`by alcohol and GHB in the CNS.3 The neurochemical abnormali-
`ties of myoclonus associated with torsion dystonia are unclear, but
`the experience of our patient suggests that the GHB receptor
`might be involved specifically. In our patient, drugs acting on the
`GABAergic pathway produced a much smaller benefit.
`GHB should be tried in cases of severe myoclonus with dysto-
`nia, especially when the disorder is reported to be alcohol sensi-
`tive. This study prompts the assessment of this drug in other
`nonepileptic myoclonic and dystonic syndromes.
`Key words: Myoclonus—Dystonia—Alcohol-sensitive—Gamma-
`hydroxybutyric acid—Movement disorders.
`
`From the Istituto di Clinica Neurologica (Drs. Priori, Pesenti, Cappellari,
`and Barbieri), Universita` di Milano, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore, Milan; the
`IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio-Fatebenefratelli (Dr. Priori), Brescia;
`and the Clinica Neurologica (Dr. Bertolasi), Universita` di Verona, Poli-
`clinico Borgo Roma, Verona, Italy.
`Received November 17, 1999. Accepted in final form December 10, 1999.
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Alberto Priori, Istituto di
`Clinica Neurologica, Universita` di Milano, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore, Padigli-
`one Ponti, Via F. Sforza 35, Milan 20122, Italy; e-mail: alberto.priori@unimi.it
`
`Copyright © 2000 by the American Academy of Neurology
`
`References
`1. Quinn NP. Essential myoclonus and myoclonic dystonia. Mov Disord
`1996;11:119–124.
`2. Gallimberti L, Gentile N, Cibin M, et al. Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid for
`the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Lancet 1989;2:787–789.
`3. Poldrugo F, Addolorato G. The role of ␥-hydroxybutyric acid in the treat-
`ment of alcoholism: from animal to clinical studies. Alcohol Alcohol 1999;
`34:15–24.
`4. Addolorato G, Cibin M, Caprista E, et al. Maintaining abstinence from
`alcohol with ␥-hydroxybutyric acid. Lancet 1998;351:38.
`5. Chadwick D, Hallett M, Harris R, et al. Clinical, biochemical and physi-
`ological factors distinguishing myoclonus responsive to 5-hydroxytryp-
`tophan, tryptophan with a monoamine oxydase inhibitor and clonaz-
`epam. Brain 1977;100:455–487.
`6. Marsden CD, Schachter M. Assessment of extrapyramidal disorders.
`Br J Clin Pharmacol 1981;11:129–151.
`7. Tunnicliff G. Sites of action of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB)—a neuro-
`active drug with abuse potential. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1997;35:581–590.
`
`AMN1027
`IPR of Patent No. 8,772,306
`
`

`

`-Hydroxybutyric acid for alcohol-sensitive myoclonus with dystonia
`A. Priori, L. Bertolasi, A. Pesenti, et al.
`Neurology
`2000;54;1706
`DOI 10.1212/WNL.54.8.1706
`
`This information is current as of April 25, 2000
`
`Updated Information &
`Services
`
`including high resolution figures, can be found at:
`http://www.neurology.org/content/54/8/1706.full.html
`
`References
`
`Citations
`
`Permissions & Licensing
`
`
`Reprints
`
`
`This article cites 7 articles, 2 of which you can access for free at:
`http://www.neurology.org/content/54/8/1706.full.html##ref-list-1
`This article has been cited by 2 HighWire-hosted articles:
`http://www.neurology.org/content/54/8/1706.full.html##otherarticles
`Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures,tables) or in
`its entirety can be found online at:
`http://www.neurology.org/misc/about.xhtml#permissions
`Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
`http://www.neurology.org/misc/addir.xhtml#reprintsus
`
`Neurology
`® is the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Published continuously since
`1951, it is now a weekly with 48 issues per year. Copyright . All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0028-3878.
`Online ISSN: 1526-632X.
`
`AMN1027
`IPR of Patent No. 8,772,306

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket