throbber
Page 1 of 4
`
`FITBIT EXHIBIT 1018
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`FITBIT EXHIBIT 1018
`
`

`
`Handbook of Medical Informatics
`
`].H. van Bemmel
`M.A. Musen
`
`Editors
`
`].C. Helder
`
`Managing editor
`
`Houten/Diegem 1997
`
`Bohn
`
`§/taarflleighum
`
`Springer
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`

`
`“7 1997 Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum, Houten, the Netherlands
`
`All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, copied or
`transmitted, in any form of by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without
`written permission from the publisher.
`
`Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may by liable to criminal prosecution
`and civil claims for damages.
`
`ISBN 90 313 2294 6 (Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum edition)
`ISBN 3-450-63351-0 (Springer-Verlag edition)
`
`This book will be distributed by Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum in The Netherlands and Belgium, by Springer-Verlag
`in the rest of the world.
`
`Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum
`De Molen 77, 3995 AW Houten, The Netherlands
`Kouterveld 2, B-1831 Diegem, Belgium
`
`Springer-Verlag
`Tiergartenstrasse 17, D-69121 Heidelberg, Germany
`
`'
`
`Dexelopmentsinnecind -
`o\er\ie\\ or the fieid.
`In
`
`professionals of the net: 1
`the assessment on‘ me -
`medical research.
`\$edical infotmatx:~ has - -
`
`-
`
`expancled drarna3c.>.i’.\
`a radical change as "oi
`add'ess the coreoi
`-.. .
`
`-
`
`‘
`
`,
`
`.
`
`- '
`-
`
`-
`~
`nea in promotion
`.-..LI bet'nerno§nsi::le-
`Tne ‘meld of medical ~ '
`-I -
`‘~v'a.'\dbcx:>& 0r'\Edv3-‘
`"eazdw im'on'nan-cs seek -
`
`'~e oe-»elopmen:a'xhe ~
`Siates assisted in 2
`.- ‘
`
`...
`
`:: e~:::moisepa'.m .‘
`2.-.2'e t“.at 2"-ere s new u
`'-:-' 2. '. cosereu, sud: as
`7-. re
`oi rnmd '
`‘I--:-Ms ,
`\\l‘E!’?§ 3'6
`'
`
`~:r'ia:n:x1 afrnonoga ii
`:-‘ :--1:-.~:crr.':a::c~ 5 aamd .
`3:0 can-e to men I’! u a
`:r tic»-:~ :n
`
`.
`
`Purpose
`"e:-.i’.n_1:eiar'1"vr:2~l1ni)I:nt
`---
`'l‘3'—“3C‘ ‘*5 °3'''¥‘‘' '
`
`:1‘
`
`r‘n:r"'*.a:C:~ 5 fritlttlg -*
`~,.;rE. .33_,_—I,;r ,3‘ i ,
`$5.‘: U rfié item
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`

`
`Data and Information
`
`Example 2:
`
`Imaging
`
`Imaging is an area in health care that is of great impor-
`tance for making a diagnosis. In Chapters 9, IO, and 26
`special attention is paid to this area. Here we discuss
`an example from cardiology. When we are interested
`in the filling of the ventricles with blood as a function
`of time, a radiopaque fluid is injected in the veins and
`is transported to the heart by the blood. X rays are the
`signal 5 that is used to offer information on the size of
`the ventricles. The X rays are radiated toward the chest
`and pass through it, and the received signal 5’ gives
`information about the density of the tissues in between
`the X-ray tube (S) and the sensing device R, which can
`be a photographic emulsion or a photonmultiplier.
`Apparently, the tissue and the body fluids have distort-
`ed (weakened) the original signal s, and this is exactly
`the
`information
`in which we
`are
`interested.
`
`Superimposed on 5‘, however, are also effects from tis-
`sues other than only the heart, such as the lungs and
`the ribs, causing the mixture m from which 5‘ should
`be extracted. After receiving the signal (i.e., the trans-
`mitted picture) processing can be applied to measure
`the area of the ventricles or, in the case of two simul-
`taneous orthogonal or nonparallel pictures, to estimate
`the ventricular volume as a function of time.
`In this
`
`case the cardiac output can, in principle, be measured
`as a function of time.
`
`Example 3:
`Wireless Transmission
`
`In some instances it might be of interest to fix a wire
`less transmitter on the body (e.g., in the case of Halter
`monitoring; see Chapter 12) to implant a transducer or
`even a transmitter in the body (eg, to measure intra-
`cranial pressure). The transmitter S then sends the sig-
`nal s to some receiver R not too far remote from the
`
`body. Radio transmission is used to avoid wires that
`would hamper the natural protrusion of the micro-
`transmitter.
`
`In all three of these examples, both the sender and the
`receiver were man—made and so were the signals gene-
`rated by the user. In the first example, S and R are iden-
`
`22
`
`tical; in the second example, 5 (the X—ray tube) and R
`(the camera) are physically opposite and mechanically
`coupled. In the third example, the connection between
`sender and receiver is looser.
`
`The next few examples deal with other types of com-
`munication in which the patient or organs function as
`sender or receiver. We shall specifically point to the
`disturbance generated in the transmission channel.
`
`Example 4:
`
`Transmission by Natural
`
`Language
`
`During patient history taking, the message 5 is carried
`by natural
`language (i.e.,
`it
`is spoken).
`It should be
`noted that an experienced clinician also acquires
`information from nonverbal messages, such as from
`body language. The receiver, that is, the clinician, has
`enough expertise to extract the message from the mix-
`ture m.
`In this case, however, the disturbance is not
`merely the added noise from the environment but is
`also the fact that the true meaning of the message is
`hidden in the natural
`language.
`In other words,
`to
`comprehend the message, the receiver must immedia-
`tely interpret the message so that a meaningful feed-
`back can be given to the patient. The mere superposi-
`tion of s and n no longer applies here; the message also
`has no truly physical or quantitative value, but is car-
`ried by natural
`language. Only by interpretation and
`coding is the true message filtered out of the mixture of
`words.
`If clinicians have not been properly trained,
`they will be unable to find a meaningful message in
`the medium,
`the language. This is the reason why
`natural language interpretation by computers is extre
`mely difficult and, perhaps, never fully attainable.
`In some applications an artificial situation is created in
`which the patient is still the sender S, but the receiver
`R is a computer that is equipped with a program that
`generates (sends) questions to be answered by the
`patient
`in a structured manner (e.g.,
`in a multiple-
`choice mode).
`In some cases it
`is useful
`to let the
`human interview be preceded by a structured patient-
`computer interview (for a more extensive description
`of the pros and cons of computer-supported data entry,
`see Chapter 7).
`
`Example 5:
`
`Biosignals
`
`Every living cell, organ. or
`for internal communication
`the outside world. In -
`-
`-.
`
`0 --..~
`u
`ation as a biological
`put, and in some circu .-.
`rested in offering this 0
`n r.‘
`ine its response, as we hase
`of the cell that was sti
`
`Such biological signals can
`
`-.
`0 electrochemical. for -
`a cell, which is the rest
`the cell membrane. sud!
`mechanical,
`for e ..
`.
`
`motion by thoracic
`ilows and pressures:
`biochemical, fore .
`
`.-
`
`PO_. or PCO1:
`hormonal,
`for example.
`during labor.
`
`' rnost instances M3 deal 1-‘
`tr 3 indicated aboxe. The --
`.e'. distorted bv the I
`..
`.-
`‘Ls oass differenttissuesal‘
`
`ewarnleofasignalsthat a
`r 'eact'1es the transducer is
`
`-
`
`‘.5 -
`I
`r 1% detected, and du-‘mg -
`he xerine and abdominal
`-
`963%.
`thematernal ECG -u '
`E’ r‘ mirage than the hi :
`‘-‘E
`between Ed .
`Traxotr xaout poggjug ‘yd . _.
`
`mlzv-am .~::rarsrnimd
`2:2-*-e-:nrnearscx'
`.-
`
`.-
`Jrzvnzarabrt-'5emzne‘
`
`%rr-r.;~,;yg3¢fi3:5[55_
`Ugercaneraucutigfi
`
`Page 4 of 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket