throbber
HELP:
`A Dynamic
`Hospital
`Information
`System
`
`I
`
`Springer-Verlag
`
`FITBIT EXHIBIT 1016
`
`Page 1 of 6
`
`FITBIT EXHIBIT 1016
`
`

`
`Gilad J. Kuperman Reed M. Gardner
`T. Allan Pryor
`
`HELP: A Dynamic Hospital
`Information System
`
`With 110 Illustrations
`
`Springer-Verlag
`New York Berlin Heidelberg London Paris
`Tokyo Hong Kong Barcelona Budapest
`
`Page 2 of 6
`
`

`
`To Dr. Homer R. W
`
`Gilad J. Kuperman, M.D.
`National Library of Medicine Fellow in
`Medical Informatics
`LDS Hospital/University of Utah
`Salt Lake City, UT 84143, USA
`
`TI Allan Pryor
`Professor, Department of Medical
`Informatics
`University of Utah;
`Co-chairman, Department of Medical
`Informatics LDS Hospital;
`Salt Lake City, UT 84143, USA
`
`Reed M. Gardner, P1-1.1).
`Professor, Department of Medical
`Informatics
`University of Utah;
`Co-chairman, Department of Medical
`
`Informatics LDS Hospital;
`salt Lake clty’ UT 84143’ USA
`
`Series Editor:
`Helmuth F. Orthner
`Professor of Computer Medicine
`The George Washington University Medical Center
`Washington, DC 20037, USA
`
`Library of Congress Cataloging-imPublication Data
`Kuperman, Gilad J.
`HELP: A dynamic hospital information system/ Gilad J. Kuperman,
`Reed M. Gardner, T. Allan Pryor.
`p.
`cm. — (Computers and medicine)
`Includes bibliographical references.
`ISBN 0-387-97431-8 (alk. paper). — ISBN 3-540-97431-8 (alk.
`D3133?)
`2. Medical care—Data
`1. HELP (Information retrieval system)
`processing.
`3. Hospital care—Data processing.
`4. Hospitals-
`Administration-—Data processing.
`1. Gardner, Reed M.
`II. Pryor,
`T. Allan (Thomas Allan)
`III. Title.
`IV. Series: Computers and
`medicine (New York, N.Y.)
`2. Hospital
`[DNLM:
`1. Decision Making, Computers-Assisted.
`Information Systems.
`3. Medical Records. WX 26.5 K96h]
`R858.K86
`1991
`610’ .285 —dc2O
`DNLM/DLC
`for Library of Congress
`
`Printed on acid—free paper.
`
`© 1991 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
`All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written
`permission of the publisher (Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010,
`USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with
`any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic, adaptation, computer software, or by similar or
`dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden.
`The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc., in this publication, even if the former
`are not especially identified, is not to be taken as a sign that such names, as understood by the Trade Marks
`and Merchandise Act, may accordingly be used freely by anyone.
`While the advice and information in this book is believed to be true and accurate at the date of going to
`press, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors
`or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the
`material contained herein.
`
`Typeset by Bytheway Typesetting Services, Norwich, NY.
`Printed and bound by Edwards Brothers, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI.
`Printed in the United States of America.
`
`9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
`
`ISBN 0-387-97431-8 Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Heidelberg
`ISBN 3-540-97431-8 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York
`
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`
`1. History of the HELP System
`
`The Cardiovascular Period: 1954 to 1967
`
`I
`
`in cardiovascular physiology at
`c
`. before coming to Utah.
`In
`using computers in medicine,
`o
`-
`« study the propagation of pulse
`powerful digital computers were
`through the liver, kidney, and
`-
`- n--- This work was successful
`
`published work of computers in
`
`" » Computers
`
`—« was an object of study in the
`an - « ‘ tion and new surgical tech-
`-n t of these diseases practicable.
`- _' on clinical grounds. There now
`- based purely on clinical findings
`~ -- on the catheterization results.
`- Dr. Alan F. Toronto and Dr.
`
`- 've diagnoses of the physicians
`‘-
`. was often incorrect when com-
`. These observations, along with
`-
`Lusted [2] who had theorized that
`-- by applying a statistical (Baye-
`- his colleagues to see how well the
`diagnoses based on clinical find-
`- patient findings and conditional
`- -« — that could account for the
`
`1 elihood. The program performed
`- --
`' y the actual diagnosis (based
`as likely was equal to, or better
`_..- who were asked to predict the
`The computer also generated a
`catheterizations became a rou-
`

`
`computerized diagnostic methods
`-o- . However, the statistical tech-
`'
`ed important in the realm of
`
`Ira used and data entry was per-
`- . Programs were written in For-
`on punched cards as “memory.”
`
`..-- [0 LDS Hospital. Throughout this

`». Hospital man be used.
`
`These punched cards were run through the card reader, which generated
`machine-executable code. The output was then generated and printed. Data
`entry required days to do what could be done in seconds on a modern
`personal computer. The IBM computer had a memory capacity of 8000 to
`12,000 bytes. Random access memory and disk drives became available
`only in the early 1960s. The first disk drive used in the laboratory was half
`the size of a home refrigerator and stored a grand total of 5 megabytes of
`data.
`
`1.1.3 1963: Digital Signal Processing
`
`Experiments in the catheterization laboratory produced a variety of physio-
`logical signals (blood pressures from the heart chambers and vessels, dye
`dilution curves, the ECG, and nerve potentials) from experimental animals.
`Drs. Homer R. Warner, W. Sanford Topham, and one of the authors
`(RMG)2 were interested in processing these signals to aid their understand-
`ing of physiological control systems. At first the signals were processed
`manually but the laboratory staff soon realized the computer could be used
`to acquire, process, and report the signals. The signals were being digitized
`by hand sampling and the results keypunched into the computer. When
`analog-to-digital converters became available, the signals could be automat-
`ically captured by the computer and converted into digital form for further
`processing and reporting. The first analog—digital converter (or ADC) filled
`a 6-foot high rack, cost $80,000, and had a (what was at the time thought
`to be very fast) sampling rate of 50,000 samples per second. A modern
`ADC with a sampling rate of more than 1 million samples per second can
`be purchased for $200 to $300. Much of the important early research in the
`field of physiological data acquisition and processing took place at LDS
`Hospital and contributed greatly to the field of what is now called patient
`monitoring. Patient monitoring has played an important role in medical
`care since the 19605 permitting, to a great extent, the advent of critical care
`medicine and intensive care units.
`In 1964, the computer hardware was changed from an IBM 1620 to a
`Control Data Corporation 3200 (CDC 3200) computer. The CDC 3200 had
`serial number 3! This machine had a stupendous amount of main mem-
`ory—32K bytes. Each clinical program was designed to run in a 2000-byte
`partition, tiny by today’s standards. A time-sharing system was developed
`
`2Dr. Reed M. Gardner first came to LDS Hospital during the winter of 1960 as a National
`Science Foundation research fellow in Electrical Engineering doing work on analog computer
`simulations. He returned to the Laboratory in the fall of 1962 as a graduate student in
`Electrical Engineering doing work on acquisition and analog—digital conversion of physiologi-
`cal signals. He received a Ph.D. in Biophysics and Bioengineering from the University of Utah
`in 1968.
`
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`
`l. History of the HELP System
`
`Expansion of the Database: 1967 to 1972
`
`simultaneously and would time
`‘c_‘
`
`.|
`
`yfics and Bioengineering was es-
`Unjversity of Utah. The depart-
`cu - 11 as the Department of Medi-
`- chairman and Drs. Topham and
`Students were first graduated in
`have received doctorates and
`
`from the department.
`
`Computerization
`
`- physiological signals (i.e.,
`'
`_', it was decided to try to obtain
`- heart catheterization. Drs. War-
`- Clinton Day were involved in the
`
`nu laboratory required develop-
`storage cathode-ray tubes (CRTs)
`CRTs write the information only
`constant refresh technology used
`custom-built and cost about
`- -- to permit physicians to operate
`
`erization data became part of
`. The system was more accurate
`rsults, and allowed physicians to
`minutes of finishing the case. At
`.- were caused by rheumatic fever
`the physiological data was crucial
`
`the computer could help them to
`the surgical process as well. The
`laboratory were extended to two
`- --
`intensive care unit for post-
`

`
`at the Cardiovascular Laboratory. He
`Cape Canaveral, Florida programming a
`- ' --
`involved in the early space program.
`- a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the
`
`open-heart surgical patients. The computer installed in the open-heart unit
`used vacuum tube and analog computer technology since it was impractical
`to have huge digital devices in a clinical setting. Connecting the computers
`to the bedside monitors required special integrated circuits, switching cir-
`cuits, and digital multiplexors, all of which had to be custom-built.
`
`1.1.6 1967: Regional Medical Program Outreach
`
`In 1967 the Regional Medical Outreach Program granted LDS Hospital $2
`million to be used over 3 years to study the feasibility of using computers
`to communicate with geographically distant hospitals. The purpose of the
`program was to develop techniques for bringing state of the art medical
`techniques and medical knowledge to rural hospitals. The grant allowed-
`for expansion of the LDS Hospital computer system (this included an up-
`grade to a CDC 3300) and for the development of communications tech-
`niques. Four other hospitals were all equipped to be able to perform com-
`puterized intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring, electrocardiography (ECG),
`pulmonary function testing, and cardiac catheterization. Signals would be
`transmitted to the LDS Hospital computer system that would provide inter-
`pretation functions. Communications were via analog modems over tele-
`phone lines. With the help of AT&T, special analog modems were devel-
`oped that allowed the storage tube CRTs to be used remotely. Although
`the concepts and their operation were a success, problems such as noise on
`the communications lines and repeated failures of the devices pointed out
`the importance of reliability in a system’s routine clinical functioning.
`Computers and Biomedical Research was established in 1967, with Dr.
`Warner as editor, to provide a forum for researchers in computers and
`biomedicine. The journal continues to be one of the leading publications in
`medical informatics.
`
`1.2 Expansion of the Database: 1967 to 1972
`
`In 1965 the sequential multichannel chemistry analyzer became available.
`This system (the Technicon SMA-12) could analyze 12 chemical values
`from a single serum sample. John D. Morgan was assigned to interface the
`SMA-12 to the computer system so that laboratory data could be reviewed
`in the catheterization laboratory and ICUs along with the hemodynamic
`data. The benefits of having many forms of clinical data available concur-
`rently quickly became evident and projects that captured other types of
`patient data were soon begun.
`Drs. Warner, Gardner, and Pryor determined that the best way to store
`and retrieve clinical information required some kind of medical terminol-
`ogy coding scheme. Work began on the coding scheme known as pointer-
`to-text, or PTXT (pronounced “P-text”). This scheme is still used and is
`
`Page 6 of 6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket