throbber
REVIEW TherapeuticTopics
`
`A look at the
`
`varieties of this
`
`common agent
`
`and how they can
`
`help soothe
`
`patients’ eyes.
`
`Demystifying
`Dumulcents
`
`DRY EYE AND OCULAR ALLERGY ARE
`both conditions that can and often do cause
`ocular surface irritation in those patients that
`suffer from them. Roughly 11 to 22 percent
`of the American population is estimated to
`have signs and symptoms of dry eye,1 while
`another 20 percent or more experience some
`form of ocular allergy.2 The symptoms pro-
`duced by epithelial desiccation or other sur-
`face irritation can greatly affect quality of life
`for afflicted patients. Formulations used to
`combat these symptoms generally turn to a
`group of compounds with a name dating back
`to when our field was a guild, not a profession.
`They turn to the class of soothing agents
`called demulcents. Although the term is
`ancient, the average clinician’s understanding
`of demulcents is minimal.
`The term demulcent is often used rather
`loosely—an agent with demulcent properties is
`one that soothes inflamed or otherwise irritated
`areas of the epithelium. More specifically, a
`demulcent usually accomplishes this symptom
`amelioration by targeting and protecting mucus
`membranes with its oily or mucilaginous con-
`sistency. Falling under the more general head-
`ing of “lenitives” (substances providing any sort
`of relief from pain or discomfort), demulcents
`should not be confused with emollients—the
`latter provide a similar soothing action for in-
`ternal surfaces, while demulcents are agents ex-
`clusively providing alleviation of external dis-
`comfort.
`Most commonly incorporated in artificial
`tears used to manage dry eye, ophthalmic de-
`mulcents are usually expected to lubricate, as
`well as soothe, the ocular surface. In fact, the
`term “lubricant” is used interchangeably with
`“demulcent” when labeling ophthalmic prod-
`ucts. A demulcent can imbue an artificial tear
`
`Mark B. Abelson, MD, and Russell Anderson
`North Andover, Mass.
`
`or other formulation with the ability to enhance
`ocular surface lubricity, easing the wear and
`tear on the ocular surface caused by a lid dur-
`ing the blink process. Also, the often mucilagi-
`nous makeup of demulcents provides them
`with a water-binding capacity that can help
`keep the ocular epithelium hydrated.
`The U.S. Food and Drug Administration rec-
`ognizes six categories of ophthalmic demul-
`cents, with each category containing one or
`more compounds: cellulose derivatives; dextran
`70; gelatin; liquid polyols; polyvinyl alcohol and
`povidone. Cellulose derivatives and polyols are
`the demulcents most frequently used as active
`or supplementary components of new tear sub-
`stitutes. Every compound in the U.S. FDA
`monograph of ophthalmic agents that appears
`in the Code of Federal Regulations is assigned a
`range of concentration—a demulcent con-
`tained in a tear substitute must remain within
`this range in order for the eye drop to be al-
`lowed by the FDA as an over-the-counter for-
`mulation.3 In some cases these concentration
`ranges have not been arrived at empirically—
`there are no dose-response curves supporting
`the ranges. It is acceptable for an ophthalmic
`preparation to contain up to three mono-
`graphed demulcents of any type, and in some
`cases, as with dextran 70, combination with
`another demulcent is required. One or more
`(again, up to three) demulcents may additional-
`ly be combined with either a single ophthalmic
`vasoconstrictor or a vasoconstrictor/astringent
`combination to yield a formulation with multi-
`ple ingredients with different actions. This has
`become more common recently, as evidence
`
`1 2 2 N O V E M B E R 2 0 0 6 • R E V I E W O F O P H T H A L M O L O G Y
`
`ARGENTUM PHARM. 1043
`
`000001
`
`

`

`patients with only early-stage signs
`and symptoms of dry eye, and there-
`fore it contains only the lowest possi-
`ble concentration of HPMC (0.2%).
`GenTeal products aimed at more
`advanced dry-eye sufferers contain a
`0.3% HPMC concentration. Drops
`
`Ophthalmic Demulcents
`
`Cellulose derivatives
`• Carboxymethylcellulose sodium
`• Hydroxyethyl cellulose
`• Hypromellose
`• Methylcellulose
`Dextran 70
`
`Gelatin
`Polyols (liquid)
`• Glycerin
`•
`Polyethylene glycol 300
`•
`Polyethylene glycol 400
`•
`Polysorbate 80
`•
`Propylene glycol
`Polyvinyl alcohol
`Povidone
`
`Demulcent
`
`continues to suggest the benefit of in-
`corporating demulcents into products
`that target ocular allergy; they have
`traditionally been used more in artifi-
`cial tears for chronic and acute dry
`eye, contact lens care solutions and
`similar formulations. The four cate-
`gories of de-
`mulcents that may
`be included in
`these preparations
`can differ in many
`ways—for
`in-
`stance, in terms of
`concentration,
`action or imple-
`mentation, though
`soothing ocular
`irritation is the
`ultimate goal in
`each case.
`Here’s a look at
`each demulcent
`category:
`• Cellulose
`d e r i v a t i v e s .
`These have be-
`come popular ac-
`tive ingredients
`for tear substi-
`tutes in recent years. In addition to
`providing a transient palliative effect
`on surface irritation, they can be used
`to enhance the viscosity of a prepara-
`tion to theoretically increase residence
`time. The most notable and widely
`used demulcents of this class include
`carboxymethylcellulose
`sodium
`(CMC) and hydroxypropyl methylcel-
`lulose (HPMC). All monographed cel-
`lulose derivatives are allowable in
`over-the-counter ophthalmic formula-
`tions in concentrations between 0.2%
`and 2.5%. HPMC is found in, among
`other products, the GenTeal (No-
`vartis) line of artificial tears. GenTeal
`Mild is an artificial tear intended for
`
`Allowable concentration
`
`0.2 – 2.5 %
`0.2 – 2.5 %
`0.2 – 2.5 %
`0.2 – 2.5 %
`0.1 % (when used with another
`polymeric demulcent agent in
`this section)
`0.01 %
`
`0.2 – 1 %
`0.2 – 1 %
`0.2 – 1 %
`0.2 – 1 %
`0.2 – 1 %
`0.1 – 4 %
`0.1 – 2 %
`
`ing as a wetting and lubricating agent
`in several cases of small-gauge cata-
`ract surgery. (Pruzon J, et al. IOVS
`2006;47: ARVO E-Abstract 686)
`CMC is a common demulcent that
`can be used to increase the viscosity of
`an ophthalmic formulation, though at
`the risk of making
`an eye drop cause
`post-instillation
`blurring. Like
`HPMC, CMC has
`a very high molec-
`ular weight. The
`active agent in the
`Refresh (Allergan)
`line of artificial
`tears, CMC
`is
`found in 0.5%
`concentrations in
`the products de-
`signed for early-
`stage dry-eye suf-
`ferers. That con-
`centration is dou-
`bled (to 1%) in
`Refresh Liquigel,
`a much more vis-
`cous tear substi-
`tute intended to
`offer greater relief for dry-eye signs
`and symptoms for patients with more
`advanced cases. TheraTears (Ad-
`vanced Vision Research) is an artificial
`tear that contains a lower, 0.25% con-
`centration of CMC, making for a
`more free-flowing drop. In addition to
`CMC and HPMC, other cellulose
`derivative monographed demulcents
`include similar polymers: hydroxyethyl
`cellulose and methylcellulose.
`• Dextran 70. This is a high-mole-
`cular-weight polysaccharide that con-
`stitutes its own category of demulcent.
`A primarily safe compound that finds
`many applications that are medical,
`commercial and even veterinary in
`
`containing HPMC can be formulated
`as oil-in-water emulsions, and the mu-
`coadhesive properties of the polymer
`in combination with an oil can help
`supplement both the mucin and lipid
`components of the tear film.4 Ac-
`cording to a study presented at the
`Southeastern Council of Optometry
`meeting, HPMC is also a popular
`component of contact lens solutions
`due to its water-retentive abilities and
`a molecular structure that prevents it
`from penetrating the lens itself.
`These properties allow for other ap-
`plications. In a recent study, an
`HPMC-containing gel formulation
`maintained corneal clarity while serv-
`
`R E V I E W O F O P H T H A L M O L O G Y • N O V E M B E R 2 0 0 6 1 2 3
`
`000002
`
`

`

`REVIEW TherapeuticTopics
`
`nature, dextran is only capable of en-
`hancing the demulcent qualities of an
`over-the-counter formulation when
`used in combination with another
`monographed demulcent, usually
`HPMC. It is most notably incorporat-
`ed into the Tears Naturale (Alcon)
`line of lubricant eye drops, in which
`0.3% HPMC and 0.1% dextran 70 act
`simultaneously to create a viscous and
`soothing drop. The number 70 refers
`to the 70-kilodalton molecular weight
`of the macromolecule—in the Tears
`Naturale formulation, this high molec-
`ular weight of the dextran constituent
`helps allow for a relatively long, two-
`hour retention time for the drop.5
`Dextran 70 may only be used in a
`0.1% concentration in monographed
`ophthalmic preparations.
`• Gelatin. Though monographed
`for use as an ophthalmic demulcent,
`gelatin is seldom included in oph-
`thalmic formulations for this purpose.
`A more common ophthalmic applica-
`tion of gelatin is in the form of intra-
`canalicular implants for inhibiting tear
`drainage in dry-eye patients. It is also
`an ingredient in some oral-delivery
`capsules intended to improve ocular-
`surface or tear-film health through
`delivery of components such as omega
`3 fatty acids.
`Even in the case of gelatinous tear
`substitutes, the gel structure is not
`attained through inclusion of gelatin
`itself, but rather through a gelling
`agent like HP-Guar, a high concentra-
`tion of another demulcent or a car-
`bopol-type gel. Gelatin is nevertheless
`a reliable viscosity agent for oph-
`thalmic formulary purposes, and is
`allowable in a 0.01% concentration in
`over-the-counter products.
`• Liquid polyols. The fourth cate-
`gory of monographed ophthalmic
`demulcents includes five different liq-
`uid polyols. Polyols are sugar-like
`hydrogenated carbohydrates that are
`also called polyhydric alcohols. The
`
`most notable application of these in
`current ophthalmic products is the
`inclusion of propylene glycol 0.3%
`(PG) and polyethylene glycol 400
`0.4% (PEG 400) in the aqueous tear
`Systane (Alcon) and the gel Systane
`Free. Because polyols are not as
`prone to increasing viscosity as cellu-
`lose derivatives, they may be used in
`
`Both glycerin and
`polysorbate 80 are
`included as inactive
`ingredients in Allergan’s
`Restasis, the dry-eye
`prescription product
`using the active agent
`cyclosporine A.
`
`combination with a gelling agent. In
`the Systane line, this is accomplished
`with the inclusion of HP-Guar, which
`combines with the two liquid demul-
`cents to form a cross-linked muco-
`mimetic layer that can help protect
`the corneal surface and allow for
`epithelial self-repair.5 A comparative
`study demonstrated that a tear substi-
`tute containing PG and PEG 400 pro-
`vided better lubricity than a tear con-
`taining HPMC, which in turn was
`more effective at creating lubricity be-
`tween two moving surfaces than a
`product containing CMC.6
`All of the polyhydric alcohol demul-
`cents are allowable in concentrations
`ranging from 0.2% to 1% in over-the-
`counter formulations. Glycerin is usu-
`ally used in 0.2% or 0.3% concentra-
`tions combined with other lubricants,
`although in some instances it may be
`used as the only demulcent in a prod-
`uct when thickly concentrated (1%
`concentration). Another mono-
`graphed demulcent often used in
`combination with other agents is
`
`1 2 4 N O V E M B E R 2 0 0 6 • R E V I E W O F O P H T H A L M O L O G Y
`
`polysorbate 80, which is usually incor-
`porated into oil emulsion drops such
`as Soothe (Alimera Sciences) and
`Refresh Endura (Allergan). Oil emul-
`sions generally target the lipid layer of
`the tear film, which can become de-
`pleted, particularly in those dry-eye
`patients suffering from meibomian
`gland dysfunction. Both glycerin and
`polysorbate 80 are also included as
`inactive ingredients in Restasis (Aller-
`gan), the dry-eye prescription product
`utilizing the active agent cyclosporine
`A. Polyethylene glycol 300 (PEG 300)
`is the fifth and final monographed
`demulcent in the polyols category.
`• Polyvinyl alcohol. PVA was one
`of the original non-saline lubricants
`included in artificial tears dating back
`to the 1980s. Effective as a solo or
`combinative agent, and allowable in
`concentrations ranging from 0.1% to
`4%, polyvinyl alcohol was a reliable
`all-purpose lubricant for many years.
`Although most new dry-eye formu-
`lations opt for more viscous or lubri-
`cating demulcents, polyvinyl alcohol is
`still a primary component in some hy-
`potonic tear solutions such as AKWA
`Tears (Akorn) and HypoTears (No-
`vartis). In the former formulation it
`acts alone, and in the latter it’s com-
`bined with PEG 400. Polyvinyl alco-
`hol is also used in some soft contact
`lens care products, and PVA hydrogels
`have even been tested as contact lens
`materials.7 In Murine Tears (Prestige
`Brands), which targets dry eye, a 0.5%
`concentration of PVA acts in conjunc-
`tion with another standard ophthalmic
`lubricant, povidone (in a 0.6% con-
`centration).
`• Povidone. This demulcent, also
`known as polyvinylpyrrolidone, has
`numerous applications and, like dex-
`tran 70, is sometimes used medically
`to expand blood plasma. More com-
`monly, povidone is combined with
`iodine to form povidone-iodine com-
`plex, a potent epithelial antiseptic that
`
`000003
`
`

`

`is capable of being used for topical ophthalmic antiseptic
`purposes. Povidone is a traditional monographed demul-
`cent, allowable in concentrations ranging from 0.1% to
`2%, and has recently seen positive results in a new capaci-
`ty—as a lubricating and soothing component in ocular
`anti-allergy drops.
`A novel anti-allergy formulation, olopatadine 0.2%
`(Alcon), contains the demulcent povidone. As compared
`to Patanol (olopatadine 0.1%, Alcon), the increased con-
`centration in the reformulated drop gives it an impressive
`24-hour duration of action—allowing for once-a-day dos-
`ing—yet it retains safety and comfort levels comparable to
`Patanol.8 The inclusion of povidone has facilitated this suc-
`cess both by acting as a lubricating agent for those patients
`with allergy and concomitant ocular surface damage, and
`by enhancing the solubility of olopatadine. This novel for-
`mulation of olopatadine, along with the anti-allergy drop
`azelastine (Optivar, MedPointe), which contains the lubri-
`cant HPMC, should help to pave the way for the incorpo-
`ration of demulcents into ocular anti-allergy products.
`Ophthalmic demulcents are vital components of both
`over-the-counter and prescription formulations used for
`managing dry eye, allergy and for caring for contact lenses.
`They may be used to thicken a drop or to lubricate the
`epithelium, but they always contribute to soothing the
`symptoms of surface irritation. Being familiar with the
`classes of demulcents and their useful and allowable con-
`centrations can help any clinician better treat or manage a
`patient’s condition. Knowledge is power, and with the
`mystery surrounding demulcents now cleared up, you can
`RO
`handle your patients’ ocular discomfort more effectively.
`
`Dr. Abelson, an associate clinical professor of ophthal-
`mology at Harvard Medical School and senior clinical sci-
`entist at Schepens Eye Research Institute, consults in oph-
`thalmic pharmaceuticals. Mr. Anderson is a medical writer
`at Ophthalmic Research Associates in North Andover.
`
`1. Brewitt H, Sistani F. Dry eye disease: The scale of the problem. Surv
`Ophthalmol 2001;45:199-201.
`2. Abelson MB, Smith L, Chapin M. Ocular allergic disease: Mechanisms, dis-
`ease sub-types, treatment. Ocular Surface 2003;1:3:38-60.
`3. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 21, Vol. 5, Sec. 349.12,349.3,349.6.
`4. Rieger G. Lipid-containing eye drops: A step closer to natural tears.
`Ophthalmologica 1990;201:4:206-212.
`5. Palfalvi M, Kahan IL. Efficacy and retention time of a new tear substitute.
`Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1993;71:6:836-8.
`6. Ubels JL, Clousing DP, Van Haitsma TA, et al. Pre-clinical investigation of
`the efficacy of an artificial tear solution containing hydroxypropyl-guar as a
`gelling agent. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:6:437-44.
`7. Hyon SH, Cha WI, Ikada Y, Kita M, Ogura Y, Honda Y. Poly(vinyl alcohol)
`hydrogels as soft contact lens material. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1994;5:5:397-
`406.
`8. Abelson MB, Gomes PJ, et al. Clinical efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride
`ophthalmic solution 0.2% compared with placebo in patients with allergic con-
`junctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis: A randomized, double-masked environmental
`study. Clin Ther 2004;26:8:1237-1248.
`
`000004
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket