throbber
New products
`
`Fesoterodine (Foviaz): new
`option for overactive bladder
`
`Steve Chaplin MSG, A/lF?PharmS and Adrian Wagg FRCP
`
`KEY POINTS
`
`0 fesoterodine (Toviaz) is a prodrug that is
`rapidly converted to the active metabolite of
`tolterodine, which is an antimuscarinic agent
`
`
`
`' licensed for the treatment of OAB symptoms
`and shares the contraindications of other agents in its class
`
`' available as prolonged-release 4mg and 8mg tablets (28, £29.03)
`
`' dosage 4mg once daily, increasing to max. 8mg once daily if necessary;
`reassess after eight weeks
`
`Fesoterodine, the prodrug of
`
`the active metabolite of
`
`tolterodine, has been
`
`launched in two strengths for
`
`the treatment of overactive
`
`bladder. In our New products
`
`review Steve Chaplin pre-
`
`sents the clinical data relat-
`
`' in clinical trials, fesoterodine 4 or 8mg once daily reduced the mean
`number of micturitions per day by about 0.5-1.0 and the mean number
`of urge incontinence episodes by 0.8-1.3 compared with placebo
`
`ing to its efficacy and
`
`adverse effects, and Dr
`
`' an additional 20-30 per cent of patients reported their symptoms
`improvedlvery improved compared with placebo
`
`9 although fesoterodine has not been directly compared with tolterodine,
`its efficacy appears to be similar
`
`° adverse effects are similar to those of other antimuscarinic agents, the
`commonest being dry mouth, headache and constipation
`
`‘ for some outcome measures the 8mg dose appears to be more effec-
`tive than the 4mg dose, offering flexibility in dosing
`
`Adrian Wagg comments on
`
`its place in treatment.
`
`veractive bladder syndrome
`(OAB) is defined as urgency,
`with or without urge urinary incon-
`tinence, usually with frequency and
`nocturia. Current management
`guidelines for OAB in women rec-
`ommend lifestyle change, pelvic
`floor muscle training for three
`months and bladder training for
`six weeks as first-line therapy.l If
`bladder training is ineffective, an
`antimuscarinic agent should be
`added and women should be coun-
`selled about the adverse effects.
`
`The drug of first choice is imme-
`diate-release oxybutynin; if this is
`not tolerated, the alternatives are
`darifenacin (Emselex), solifenacin
`(Vesicare), tolterodine (Detrusitol),
`
`12
`
`Prescriber 5 November 2008
`
`trospium (Regurin) and modified-
`release (Lyrinel XL) or transdermal
`(Kentera) oxybutynin. These drugs
`improve
`frequency,
`leakage
`episodes and quality oflife with no
`evidence of clinically important dif-
`ferences in efficacy. Antimuscarinic
`adverse-effects are common.2=3
`
`Propiverine (Detrunorm) is a
`further alternative to treat urinary
`frequency but not urge inconti-
`nence; intravaginal oestrogens are
`an option for OAB symptoms in
`postmenopausal wome11 with vagi-
`nal atrophy.1
`
`The technology
`
`Fesoterodine (Toviaz) is a pro-
`drug: it is rapidly and extensively
`
`hydrolysed in plasma to 5-hydroxy-
`methyltolterodine (5-HMT), the
`active metabolite of tolterodine. 5-
`
`HMT is an antagonist at mus-
`carinic
`receptors with
`no
`selectivity for receptor subtypes in
`vit1ra.4
`Fesoterodine is licensed for
`
`the treatment of OAB symptoms
`— increased urinary frequency
`and/or urgency and/or urgency
`incontinence. It is formulated as
`a modified-release tablet for
`
`administration.
`once-daily
`Treatment should be initiated at
`
`a dose of 4mg per day and
`increased to a maximum of 8mg
`per day according to individual
`response. The full therapeutic
`
`www. prescriber.co.uk
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2082 - 0001
`
`

`
`effect is apparent within two to
`eight weeks. Dose adjustment
`may be required in patients with
`impaired renal or hepatic func-
`tion depending on the severity of
`impairment.
`As with all antimuscarinic drugs
`caution must be exercised when
`
`the patient is undergoing concur-
`rent treatment with drugs that
`inhibit hepatic CYP3A4 enzymes,
`eg
`clarithromycin,
`protease
`inhibitors, as this will increase
`
`plasma levels of 5-HMT (see SPC
`for details).
`Fesoterodine has the same cau-
`tions and contraindications as
`other antimuscarinics.
`
`Clinical trials
`
`Two phase III randomised, double-
`blind, 12-week trials provide the
`key clinical data for fesoterodine.
`Both included patients (mean age
`58, 80 per cent of whom were
`women) with OAB and averaging
`12-13 micturitions and four urge
`incontinence episodes per day.
`Seventy-five to eighty per cent of
`patients reported incontinence.
`The mean duration of OAB was 8-
`
`10 years.
`The primary end-points were
`the change, after 12 weeks’ treat-
`ment, in the mean number of mic-
`
`turitions per 24 hours, mean
`number ()f episodes of urge incon-
`tinence per 24 hours and the treat-
`ment response, defined as the
`proportion of patients reporting
`their condition as improved or
`greatly improved.4
`In a US study in 836 patients,
`fesoterodine significantly reduced
`the mean number of micturitions
`
`per 24 hours compared with
`placebo (by 1.61 at 4mg per day
`and 2.09 at 8mg per day US 1.08
`with placebo) .5 It also significantly
`reduced the mean number ofurge
`incontinence episodes in 24 hours
`(by 1.65 and 2.28 vs 0.96 with
`placebo) and was associated with a
`
`www.prescriber.co.uk
`
`New products
`
`significantly greater treatment
`response (64 and 74 vs 45 per cent
`with placebo).
`Treatment with fesoterodine
`also increased the number of con-
`
`tinent days per week (from a base-
`line of 0.6-0.7) by 1.3 with placebo
`and 2.3 and 2.8 with 4 and 8mg per
`day. The two doses of fesoterodine
`were not compared. Nineteen per
`
`cent of patients did not complete
`the trial, of whom one-third (of all
`treatment arms) withdrew due to
`adverse events.
`
`A European study involving
`1135 patients compared fesotero-
`dine 4 or 8mg per day with placebo
`and included modified—release
`
`tolterodine 4mg per day as an
`active control to validate the study
`
`Prescriber 5 November 2008
`
`13
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2082 - 0002
`
`

`
`design.6 The principal results are
`summarised in Table 1.
`Both doses offesoterodine and
`
`to
`tolterodine were superior
`placebo; fesoterodine was not com-
`pared with tolterodine. All active
`treatments reduced the frequency
`of nocturia and overall urgency
`severity. Thirteen per cent of
`patients withdrew from the trial, of
`whom 24 per cent (from all treat-
`ment arms) did so due to adverse
`effects.
`
`Adverse effects
`
`In data pooled from clinical trials,
`adverse effects were reported by 50
`per cent of patients assigned to
`placebo or tolterodine 4mg per
`day, and by 60 and 64 per cent of
`patients taking fesoterodine 4 or
`8mg per day.4 Discontinuation due
`to adverse effects occurred in 3 per
`cent of patients taking placebo, 5-6
`per cent with fesoterodine and 3
`per cent with tolterodine. In long-
`term nonblinded studies, the dose
`of fesoterodine was reduced from
`
`New products
`
`Placebo
`
`Fesoterodine
`
`Fesoterodine
`
`Tolterodine
`
`4mg/day
`
`8mg/day
`
`4mg/day
`
`reduction in
`micturitions/24h
`
`0.95
`
`reduction in urge
`incontinence/24h
`
`increase in number
`
`of continent days
`per week
`
`Table 1. Efficacy of fesoterodine 4 and 8mg daily compared with placebo and tolterodines
`
`8 to 4mg per day due to adverse
`effects in 12 per cent of patients.
`The adverse effects associated
`
`with fesoterodine are typical of an
`antimuscarinic agent (see Table 2)
`and include dry mouth (placebo 8
`per cent, fesoterodine 4mg per day
`22 per cent, Srng per day 35 per
`cent, tolterodine 17 per cent),
`headache (8, 8, 6 and 5 per cent
`respectively) and constipation (2,
`4, 5 and 3 per cent) .4
`
`Data from ongoing long-term
`nonblinded studies suggest that
`most adverse effects occurred early
`during treatment with the excep-
`tion of urinary retention, which
`occurred in 2-3 per cent of patients
`and was more common in men and
`
`older patients.
`
`RBf6I'BI'IGBS
`1. National Institute for Health and
`
`Clinical Excellence. Urinary inconti-
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2082 - 0003
`
`

`
`New products
`
`Placebo (°/a)
`{n=780 )
`
`Feso 4mg/day (°/a)
`(n=782}
`
`Feso 8mg/day (%) Tolt 4mg/day (“/o)
`(n=785)
`(n=290)
`
`|'\ll.'.Dl\)|\Jl\'l-l>—l|\J—lI\3—l|\JO3-P-OJ'|:.;
`
`—l—lI\3l\3l\J|\JI\3l\JbDU3-l!hUJU5a
`
`‘E.
`
`1 1 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
`
`Adverse event
`
`dry mouth
`headache
`
`constipation
`urinary tract infection
`dyspepsia
`Iacrimal disorder (dry eye)
`nausea
`
`dry throat
`dysuna
`abdominal pain, upper
`nasopharyngitis
`back pain
`diarrhoea
`
`upper respiratory tract infection
`influenza
`dizziness
`
`abdominal pain
`cough
`
`feso = fesoterodine; tolt = tolterodine
`
`nence. Clinical Guideline No. 40.
`
`October 2006. www.nice.org.uk/nice-
`media/pdf/CG40NICEgL1ideline.pdf;
`accessed 17.7.08
`
`2. National Collaborating Centre for
`Women's and Children's Health.
`
`Urinary inrantmenre. RCOG Press:
`London, October
`2006
`www.
`nice.nrg.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG40full
`guidelinepdf; accessed 17.7.08.
`elf ml.
`3. Nabi G, Cody JD, Ellis G,
`Anticholinergic drugs versus placebo
`
`for overactive bladder syndrome in
`adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic
`Reviews 2006,
`Issue 4. Art. No.:
`CD00378l. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.
`CDOO3781.pub2.
`4. European Medicines Agency. Tlruiaz
`European public a.rses.smmt ref1ort._]une
`2008. www.emea.europa.eu/human-
`Cl(}CS/PDFS/EPAR/[()VlaZ/H-723-
`en6.pdf; accessed 18.7.08.
`5. Nitti VW, Dmochowski R, Sand PK,
`et al. Efficacy, safety and tolerability
`
`of fesoterodine for overactive blad-
`
`der syndrome. _] Ural.‘ 2007;l78:
`2488-94.
`
`6. Chapple C, Van Kerrebroeck P,
`Tubaro A, et al. Clinical efficacy,
`safety, and tolerability of once-daily
`fesoterodine in subjects with overac-
`tive bladder. Eur Urol 2007;52:
`1204-12.
`
`By Steve (Jhaplirr, at pharmacist who
`spec2'a!z‘ses in writing on therapeutics
`
`Place in therapy
`OAB is a common condition that
`
`has a significant negative impact
`upon quality of life for many peo-
`ple.1 Treatment, according to pub-
`lished guidelines,2'4 consists of
`lifestyle and behavioural
`tech-
`niques, adding in antimuscarinic
`therapy should these measures not
`achieve symptom improvement.
`Fesoterodine is the prodrug of
`5-HMT, the active metabolite of
`tolterodine. Unlike tolterodine,
`
`conversion to 5—HMT is by non-
`specific esterases rather than the
`cytochrome
`P450
`system
`although its elimination is still
`dependent upon this system. This
`may be clinically relevant — patients
`who do not respond to the licensed
`dose of tolterodine (4mg) or expe-
`rience intolerable side-effects may
`have either had subtherapeutic or
`toxic doses of 5-HMT. This may be
`due to the variability in serum con-
`centration of 5-HMT associated
`
`with the given 4mg dose.
`
`www.prescriber.co.uk
`
`Fesoterodine is also available as
`
`an 8mg dose, and for some out-
`come measures appears to be
`more effective than the 4mg dose.5
`Additionally, secondary analyses of
`available data show a favourable
`
`and clinically meaningful improve-
`ment on quality of life,5 though
`the available data are limited and
`
`much evidence relies upon post-hoe
`analyses of clinical
`trials per-
`formed by the previous owner of
`the compound. More data are
`awaited.
`
`Prescriber 5 November 2008
`
`17
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2082 - 0004
`
`

`
` New products
`
`Fesoterodine’s side-effect pro-
`file appears much the same as
`other available antimuscarinics
`
`with the exception of a lower inci-
`dence of reported constipation;
`whether this is borne out in cur-
`rent trials and clinical use remains
`to be seen.
`
`References
`
`1. Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Irwin DE, et
`ml. The impact of overactive bladder,
`incontinence and other lower urinary
`tract synlptoms on quality of life, work
`productivity, sexuality and emotional
`
`well—bcing in men and women: results
`from the EPIC study. BJU Int 2008;
`101 (11):1?a88-95.
`2. European Association of Urology.
`C‘ttideli?tt:.s'
`in urinary incrintinerice.
`www.uroweb.org/fileadmin/tx_eau-
`guidelines/l6%20Urinary% 20Inconti
`ncnce.pdf (accessed 18.8.08) .
`3. 3rd International Consultation on
`
`Incontinence. 2005. www.congress-
`urology.org/publishing/page.accueil.
`pub.html (accessed 18.8.08).
`4.National Institute for Health and
`
`Clinical Excellence. Urinary inconti-
`'l'lf,‘T1(",K.’.
`Clinical Guideline No. 40.
`
`October 2006. www.nice.org.uk/nice-
`
`media/pdf/ CG40NICEguideline.pdf.
`5. Khullar V, Rovner ES, Dmo-
`chowski R, elf (ll. Fesoterodine dose
`response in subjects with overactive
`bladder syndrome. Urology 2008;7I
`(5):839-43.
`6. Kcllchcr C}, Tubaro A, WangJT, et
`ril. Impact of fcsolerocline on quality of
`life: pooled data from two randomized
`trials. BJU Int 2008;102(1) :56-61.
`
`By Dr Wszgg, senior lecturer and
`consultant in geriatric medicine at
`University College London H0.€}l)ll(£l.§
`and Camden PCT
`
`www.prescriber.co.uk
`
`Prescriber 5 November 2008
`
`19
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2082 - 0005

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket