throbber
142
`Chapple C1
`1. Royal Hallamshire Hospital
`
`FESOTERODINE
`
`A
`
`NEW
`
`EFFECTIVE
`
`AND
`
`WELL-TOLERATED
`
`TREATMENT OF URGENCY-FREQUENCY
`ANTIMUSCARINIC FOR THE
`SYNDROME: RESULTS OF A PHASE 2 CONTROLLED STUDY.
`
`Hypothesis I aims of study
`Fesoterodine is a novel derivative of 3,3—diphenylpropyl—amine developed by Schwarz
`Pharma for the treatment of urgency—frequency syndrome (UFS also known as overactive
`bladder). The drug is a potent antimuscarinic, rapidly absorbed and immediately hydrolyzed to
`the active metabolite, SPM 7605, without requiring hepatic metabolism.
`The objective of this trial was to determine the optimal dose of fesoterodine measuring
`efficacy, tolerability and safety in subjects with UFS.
`
`Study design, materials and methods
`Israel, and South Africa. After a 1-week
`This trial was conducted at 81 sites in Europe,
`placebo run—in, eligible subjects were randomized to receive placebo or 4, 8, or 12 mg of
`fesoterodine once daily for 12 weeks.
`Efficacy variables were measured as change from baseline to 12 weeks after treatment.
`Primary variables were change in the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours and change
`in the mean number of urge incontinence episodes per week. Treatment efficacy was
`assessed by comparing the change from baseline in a 7-day micturition diary.
`Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events and changes in clinical laboratory
`values, vital signs, ECGs, physical and urological examinations, and residual urinary
`volume. Treatment tolerance was evaluated subjectively.
`
`Results
`
`A total of 728 subjects were randomized and treated; 698 subjects were evaluable for the
`primary efficacy analysis. The mean age was 56 (age range 18-79 years) and 84% of
`subjects were female.
`
`Mean chan es from baseline to end of treatment
`
`-2.20
`
`-2.37
`
`-2.41
`
`-0.72; p=0.0030*
`
`— 0.82; p=0.0012*
`
`— 0.94; p=0.0002*
`
`Micturitionsf24 hours
`
`Mean change
`Difference from placebo
`(ANCOVA
`adjusted
`estimate)
`incontinence
`Urge
`episodesfweek
`Mean change
`Difference from placebo
`(ANCOVA
`adjusted
`estimate
`-V5 U95 are 0r1e—sre;
`
`{T195118 Sl'g‘l'll' ICEI1 H”!
`
`
`
`-12.79
`
`-11.79
`
`-13.43
`
`-3.96; p=0.0045
`
`-2.54; p=0.0521
`
`-4.61; p=0.0013*
`
`B C DS9 BS PWOCBUVB.
`
`There is a rapid improvement in both primary efficacy variables within the first two weeks of
`double-blind treatment as contrasted to placebo. Fesoterodine treatment
`results show
`significantly greater decreases in micturition frequency than placebo at all 3 doses. Early
`improvements were also seen in the reduction of the number of urge urinary incontinence
`episodes. The reduction was also seen in the 4 mg group.
`The most frequently reported AE in this trial was dry mouth (placebo 9%, 4 mg 25%, 8 mg
`26%) increasing to 34% in the 12 mg group. The use of a VAS (visual analogue scale) to
`assess dry mouth may have triggered the reporting. Dry mouth was rated as mild to moderate
`in most cases in the 4 and 8 mg groups. Drop out rates due to AE were 4% of subjects in
`placebo group, 6%, 2%, 12% in the 4 mg, 8 mg and 12 mg Fesoterodine groups, respectively.
`Adverse events with a fre uenc
`- reater than 1% in an treatment - rou -
` Adverse events > 1 %
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2076 - 0001
`
`

`
`-@
`m
`
`N=173
`
`N=186
`
`N=186
`
`I Abnormal vision
`
`II‘If|U8I1Z8 Ilka
`s mtoms
`
`Abdominal pain
`
`80/0
`
`90/0
`
`40/0
`
`40/0
`
`1%
`
`0%
`
`0%
`
`1%
`
`*after randomisation
`
`All other adverse events were in the range of placebo for all the treatment groups. Low rates
`were seen for constipation and vision disorders, which were in the placebo range.
`Fesoterodine had no clinically relevant effects on vital signs or ECG parameters.
`Based on patient assessments,
`the doses of 4mg and 8mg showed the best
`efficacy/tolerance ratios.
`
`Interpretation of results
`in the treatment of urgency-
`Fesoterodine once daily is an effective antimuscarinic agent
`frequency syndrome at all of the three doses tested.
`It significantly improved micturition
`frequency and urge incontinence episodes as compared to placebo.
`Fesoterodine was generally well tolerated, and no safety concerns were raised. Except for dry
`mouth all side effects were low or in the range of placebo,
`including constipation and vision
`disorders.
`
`Concluding message
`In conclusion, fesoterodine is a potent and well-tolerated antimuscarinic in all doses tested
`(4 mg, 8 mg and 12 mg). The most favourable efficacy—safety ratio was observed in the 4 and
`8 mg groups.
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2076 - 0002

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket