throbber
Drugs 35: 477-494 (1988)
`0012-6667/88/0004-0477/$09.00/0
`O ADIS Press Limited
`All rights reserved.
`
`Current Concepts in the Treatment of Disorders of
`Micturition
`
`Karl-Erik Andersson
`
`Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital of Lund, Lund
`
`
`Summary ................................................................................................................................... ..477
`I. Failure to Store
`................................................. ..478
`1.1 Urge Incontinence
`................................................. ..478
`1.1.1 Anticholinergic Drugs
`...-179
`1.1.2 Drugs with ‘Direct’ Actions ..................................................................... ..480
`1.1.3 Drugs with Mixed Actions
`............................................................... ..481
`1.1.4 .8-Adrenoceptor Agonists
`...433
`1.1.5 a-Adrenoceptor Antagonists
`......................................... "483
`1.1.6 Prostaglandin Synthesis Inhibitors ..
`......................................... ..484
`1.1.7 Other Drugs ..................................... ..
`...484
`1.2 Stress Incontinence
`......................................................485
`1.2.1 a-Adrenoceptor Agonists
`.................................................... ..485
`1.2.2 ti-Adrenoceptor Antagonists ..
`...486
`1.2.3 Imiprarnine
`......................................... "486
`1.2.4 Oestrogens
`......................................... ..486
`2. Failure to Empty
`...487
`2.1 Drugs Acting on the Bladder ..
`........................................................... ..487
`2.1.1 Parasympathomimetic Drugs
`.................................................... ..487
`2.1.2 Prostaglandins
`".488
`2.2 Drugs Acting on the Urethra
`......................................... ..488
`2.2.1 cu-Adrenoceptor Antagonists ......
`....................................488
`2.2.2 Other Drugs
`...489
`3. Conclusions and Recommendations
`............ ..489
`
`
`
`Contents
`
`
`
`Summary
`
`Disorders of micturition may be divided into disturbances of the storage function of
`the bladder. and disturbances of the emptying function. The main symptoms of disturb-
`ances of storage function are fi-equency. urgency and incontinence. Hyperactivity of the
`bladder may lead to urge incontinence, and incompetence of the urethral closure mech-
`anism to stress incontinence.
`
`There are many drugs available for treating bladder hyperactivity, but their efficacy
`as judged ji-om controlled clinical trials (when available) is often limited. Bladder con-
`traction in man is mediated by stimulation of muscarinic receptors, and when given par-
`enteraily anticltolinergic drugs have been shown to depress bladder hyperactivity irrespec-
`tive of the underlying cause. Clinically, however. treatment of urge incontinence with
`anticnolinergic drugs is often unsatisfactory. Lack ofetfect oforal treatment and systemic
`side eflecrs limit the use ofavailabie agents. Drugs with ‘mixed’ actions (anticlzolinergic
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2068 - 0001
`
`

`
`478
`Treatment of Disorders of Mieturition
`
`
`and ‘direct’ muscle effects). for example oxybutynin and terodiline, have well-documented
`efiicacy in bladder hyperactivity. Side effects are common with oxybutynin; terodiline seems
`to be well tolerated.
`The aim of drug treatment of stress incontinence is to increase outflow resistance.
`Although there is only limited possibility of improving the condition with drugs. beneficial
`effects can be obtained in some patients by use of orally active a-adrenoceptor agonists
`(e.g. phenylpropanolamine) and/or oestrogens.
`The main symptom of disturbed bladder emptying is urinary retention. Drug therapy
`is aimed at improving the contractile activity of the detrusor or reducing urethral outflow
`resistance. Drugs used for improving bladder contraciility include parasympathomimetic
`agents, e.g. bethanecltol or carbachol, and intravesical instillation ofprostaglandins. Al-
`though the eflicacy of both types of treatment is open to question, bethanechol seems to
`be widely used.
`Increased outflow resistance may be seen in patients with parasympathetic decentral-
`isation of the lower urinary tract or in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy. These
`patients may respond favourably to a-adrenoceptor blockers such as phenoxybenzamine
`or prazosin.
`
`
`The bladder and urethra constitute a functional
`
`unit which is controlled by a complex interplay be-
`tween the central and peripheral nervous systems
`and local regulatory factors (Andersson & Sjogren
`1982; Wein et al. 1987). Disturbances at various
`levels may result in disorders of the 2 main func-
`
`tions of this unit, storage and emptying. Failure to
`store urine may lead to various forms of incontin-
`ence, and failure to empty results in urinary reten-
`tion. Pharmacological interventions have been used
`in attempts to treat these disorders, although often
`with limited success. To improve a disturbed stor-
`
`age function the treatment should aim at decreas-
`ing detrusor activity, increasing bladder capacity
`and/or increasing outlet resistance. To facilitate
`bladder emptying the agents given should increase
`the intravesical pressure, and/or decrease the ure-
`thral resistance.
`
`1. Failure to Store
`
`1.! Urge Incontinence
`
`Urge incontinence is defined as involuntary loss
`of urine associated with a strong desire to void
`(Bates et al. 1976). It may be subdivided into mo-
`tor urge incontinence and sensory urge incontin-
`ence. Motor, but not sensory, urge incontinence is
`
`bladder, either in the form of uninhibited (invol-
`untary) bladder contractions and/or decreased
`
`compliance. Uncontrolled bladder contractions may
`occur in connection with neurological diseases or
`lesions, but can also be associated with outflow ob-
`struction, inflammation and irritative processes in
`the bladder muscle, or they may be idiopathic.
`In man, normal bladder contraction is mediated
`
`mainly through muscarinic receptors in the detru-
`
`sor muscle. Atropine resistance, i.e. contraction of
`isolated bladder muscle in response to electrical
`nerve stimulation after pretreatment with atropine,
`has been demonstrated in most animal species (see
`Andersson & Sjogren 1982), but does not seem to
`occur in normal human bladder muscle (Kinder &
`
`Mundy 1985; Sibley 1984; Sjogren et al. 1982). It
`appears that bladder hyperactivity may be the re-
`sult of several different mechanisms and it is un-
`
`likely that the hyperactivity which occurs in pri-
`mary instability without morphological changes is
`mediated by the same mechanism as hyperactivity
`in a morphologically changed bladder, such as may
`occur secondary to prostatic hypertrophy (Anders-
`son 1986).
`There is an abundance of drugs available for
`
`treatment of the overactive detrusor (table I).
`However, for many of them, estimations of elli-
`
`associated with an increased contractile activity in
`the detrusor muscle during the filling phase of the
`
`cacy are based on the results of preliminary, open
`studies rather than controlled clinical
`trials.
`It
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2068 - 0002
`
`

`
`479
`Treatment of Disorders of Micturition
`
`
`Table I. Drugs used In the therapy of bladder hyperactivity
`
`Anflehellnerule drugs
`Propanthellne bromide
`Emepronium bromide
`
`Drugs with ‘direct’ eflocta
`Flavoxato
`
`Calcium antagonists
`
`Dmge with mixed actions
`Oxybulynin
`Dlcyclornlne
`Terodlline
`Irnlprarnine
`
`.6-Adrenoeeptor egonlstu
`Terbutallne
`Clenbuterol
`
`a-Adrenoceptor antagonists
`Phenoxybenzamlne
`Prazosin
`
`Proetaglnndin synthelaae Inhibitors
`Inclomathacin
`
`Fiurbiprofen
`
`Other drugs
`Baclofen
`
`Desrnopressin
`Bromoeriptlne
`
`should be stressed that in many trials on detrusor
`instability there has been such a high placebo re-
`
`sponse that meaningful differences between pla-
`cebo and active drug cannot be demonstrated.
`
`However, drug effects in individual patients may
`be useful and important.
`
`l'.I.1 Anticholinergic Drugs
`There are reasons to believe that muscarinic re-
`
`ceptors mediate not only normal bladder contra ‘-
`tions but also the main part of contractions in
`hyperactive bladders. Atropine and other anti-
`cholinergic drugs are known to produce an almost
`complete paralysis of the normal bladder when in-
`
`jected intravenously. Several studies suggest that
`blockade of detrusor contractions can also be
`
`achieved in patients with bladder hyperactivity
`(Cardozo & Stanton 1979; Low 1977; Naglo et al.
`1981). On the other hand, there are several reports
`of insufiicient efficacy of anticholinergic drugs given
`
`orally to patients with unstable detrusor contrac-
`tions (see, for example, Bonnesen et al. 1984; Ritch
`et al. 1977; Walter et al. 1982; Zorzitto et al. 1986).
`It is unclear to what extent this can be attributed
`
`to low bioavailability (making it difficult to achieve
`
`sufficient drug concentrations in the effector or-
`gan), or to side effects (limiting the dose that can
`be given), or if atropine resistance really occurs in
`some cases of unstable bladder.
`
`In the treatment of the unstable bladder, pro-
`pantheline bromide and emepronium bromide are
`probably the most widely used drugs. These drugs
`have pronounced effects on bladder function when
`given parenterally (Blaivas et al. 1980; Boman &
`von Garrelts 1973; Cardozo & Stanton 1979; Low
`1977; Syversen et al. 1976; Ulmsten & Andersson
`1977). However, intramuscular emepronium bro-
`mide (0.l5 mg/kg) was not found to have any ef-
`fect in 6 elderly subjects suffering from urinary in-
`
`continence due to small capacity, hyper-reflexic
`bladders (Perera et al. 1982). This raises the ques-
`tion of whether or not atropine-resistant activation
`may occur in some cases.
`Both propantheline bromide (Vose et al. 1979)
`
`and emepronium bromide (Sundwall et al. 1973)
`possess low biological availabilities (S to 10%)
`which vary markedly between individuals. Pro-
`
`pantheline bromide is usually given in a dose of
`15 to 30mg 4 times daily, while the emepronium
`bromide dosage must be kept in the range 200mg
`3 to 4 times daily or higher. To obtain an optimal
`
`effect individual titration of the drugs is necessary:
`the dose is increased until incontinence is elimi-
`
`nated or until untoward side effects preclude fur-
`ther increase. Using this approach in 26 patients
`with uninhibited detrusor contraction Blaivas et al.
`
`(1980) obtained a complete clinical response in all
`
`but 1, who did not tolerate more than propanthc-
`line 15mg 4 times daily. The range of dosages var-
`ied from 7.5 to 60mg 4 times daily. In 72 women
`
`with detrusor instability, Massey & Abrams (1986)
`studied emepronium canageenate in a double-blind,
`placebo-controlled,
`randomised crossover
`trial.
`
`Dosages were individually titrated. Out of 72
`patients entering the study, 5 were withdrawn dur-
`ing the titration phase, 24 were treated with a low
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2068 - 0003
`
`

`
`Treatment of Disorders of Micturition
`480
`
`
`dose (I200mg daily), and 43 with a medium/high
`(1600/2000mg daily) dose. A dose-dependent im-
`provement, both of symptoms and of micturition
`parameters, was found.
`
`Emepronium bromide has often been attributed
`
`a ganglionic blocking action, and it has been sug-
`gested that such an effect would contribute to a
`favourable and selective effect on the bladder
`
`muscle. However, this has never been documented
`
`clinically and there is no experimental evidence that
`anticholinergic drugs have a selective effect on
`
`bladder muscle. Muscarinic receptors in detrusor
`muscle do not exhibit characteristics which dis-
`
`tinctly separate them from muscarinic receptors in
`other organs (Nilvebrant et al. 1985). The available
`anticholinergic drugs will,
`therefore, cause sys-
`temic side effects independent of which drug is
`used.
`
`As atropine and related anticholinergics are ter-
`tiary amines, they are well absorbed from the gas-
`trointestinal tract, and penetrate the central nerv-
`ous system (CNS) well. CNS side effects will,
`
`therefore, often limit their use." Quarternary am-
`monium compounds have a lower incidence of
`
`CNS side effects, but produce well-known peri-
`pheral anticholinergic side effects such as accom-
`
`tachycardia and dryness of
`modation paralysis,
`mouth. Emepronium bromide has been reported to
`cause oesophageal damage (Johnsen et al. 1982;
`Kavin I977; Kobler et al. 1978) and this prompted
`
`the development of emepronium carrageenate
`(Bagger et al. 1985; Massey & Abrams I986), from
`which active substance is released only in the pres-
`ence of excess hydrogen or sodium ions. No oeso-
`phageal damage has so far been reported with this
`preparation.
`
`1.1.2 Drugs with ‘Direct’ Actions
`
`Flavoxate
`
`The mechanism of flavoxate's effect on smooth
`
`muscle has not been established (Cazzulani et al.
`1984; Fredericks et al. I978). Cazzulani et al. (I984)
`found the drug to have moderate calcium antag-
`onistic activity and an ability to inhibit phospho-
`diesterase; no anticholinergic effect was found
`
`(CazzuIani et al. 1985). Local analgesic properties
`have also been reported (Bradley & Cazort I970;
`
`Kohler & Morales 1968). In vivo an active metab-
`olite may contribute to its effects (Pietra et al. 1986).
`The clinical effects of flavoxate in patients with
`detrusor instability and frequency, urge and incon-
`tinence have been studied in both open and con-
`
`trolled investigations but with varying rates of suc-
`cess (Delaere et al. 1977; Griineberger 1984; Jonas
`et al. 1979; Stanton 1973). Stanton (1973) com-
`pared emepronium bromide and flavoxate in a
`
`double-blind crossover study of patients with de-
`trusor instability and reported improvement rates
`of 83% and 66% after flavoxate or emepronium
`
`bromide, respectively, both administered as 200mg
`3 times daily. In another double-blind randomised
`crossover study, Robinson and Broclclehurst (1983)
`
`investigated the combined effects of 4 times daily
`administration of flavoxatc l00mg and emepron-
`ium bromide 200mg in elderly women with detru-
`
`sor instability. Despite evidence of a pharmaco-
`logical effect on the bladder, the therapeutic efficacy
`of the combination was disappointing.
`Other investigators have not been able to show
`any beneficial effect of flavoxate at the usually rec-
`ommended dosage of I00 to 200mg 3 to 4 times
`
`daily (Briggs et al. 1980). No effect was observed
`in women with detrusor instability administered
`
`flavoxate 200mg intravenously (Cardozo & Stan-
`ton 1979).
`In general, few side effects have been reported
`during treatment with flavoxate. On the other hand
`its efficacy, compared to other therapeutic altem-
`atives, is not well documented.
`
`Calcium Antagonists
`Influx of extracellular calcium is important for
`
`detrusor muscle contractions (Andersson & For-
`man 1986) and this can be blocked by calcium ant-
`agonists. Forman et al.
`(1978) showed that
`in
`isolated human bladder muscle nifedipine pretreat-
`ment effectively suppressed contractions induced
`
`by several agonists and also caused relaxation when
`administered after the agonist. Nifedipine and other
`calcium antagonists also inhibit contractions in-
`duced by electrical stimulation in bladder muscle
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2068 - 0004
`
`

`
`481
`Treatment of Disorders of Micturition
`
`
`from animals and from man (Andersson 8:. For-
`man 1986).
`There have been few clinical studies of the ef-
`
`fects of calcium antagonists in patients with un-
`stable bladders (Andersson & Forman 1986). Rud
`
`et al. (1979) found that nifedipine reduced the fre-
`quency and amplitude of unstable detrusor con-
`
`tractions, increased bladder capacity and also gave
`symptomatic relief. These results could not be con-
`
`firmed by Laval and Lutzeyer (1980) who found
`
`that nifedipine had no significant effect on un-
`stable detrusor contractions.
`
`In a double-blind placebo-controlled study,
`
`Palmer et al. (1981) found that flunaiizine caused
`both symptomatic and urodynamic improvement
`
`in women with urge incontinence. Unfortunately,
`their results could not be confirmed by several other
`
`investigators {Anderson & Murray 1984; Fanciul-
`
`laeci et al. I985; Ferrari et al. 1985).
`
`Intravesical administration of verapamil was re-
`ported to depress detrusor activity in rabbits (Go-
`toh etal. 1986). Preliminary data in man suggest
`
`that intravesical instillation of verapamil increases
`
`bladder capacity and decreases the degree of leak-
`
`age during cystometry in patients with detrusor
`hyper-reflexia. The effect was less pronounced in
`
`patients with non-neurogenic hyperactivity (Mat-
`tiasson et al. 1987).
`
`The available information does not suggest that
`
`systemic therapy with calcium antagonists is an ef-
`
`fective way to treat bladder hyperactivity. How-
`ever, the possibility that intravesical therapy with
`
`these drugs will be useful cannot be excluded, nor
`the fact that calcium antagonists may enhance the
`
`effects of anticholinetgic agents (Andersson et al.
`1987a).
`
`1.1.3 Drugs With Mixed Actions
`
`Some drugs used to block bladder hyperactivity
`have been shown to have more than 1 mechanism
`
`of action. They all have a more or less pronounced
`anticholinergic effect and,
`in addition, an often
`
`poorly defined ‘direct’ action on bladder muscle.
`
`Oxybutynin
`Oxybutynin has been attributed with a pro-
`nounced direct muscle relaxant effect, whereas its
`anticholinergic‘ action was considered moderate
`(Anderson & Fredericks 1977; Lish et al. 1965).
`However, investigations in vitro on human bladder
`tissue revealed that oxybutynin was a potent anti-
`cholinergic drug with high affinity for muscarinic
`receptors in human bladder tissue and that it ef-
`fectively blocked carbachol-induced contractions
`(Nilvebrant et al. 1985).
`Several studies have shown that oxybutynin is
`effective
`in controlling bladder hyperactivity
`(Brooks & Braf 1980; Diol-mo & Lapides 1972; Ga-
`
`jewski & Awad 1986; Homsy et al. 1985; Moisey
`et al. 1980; Paulson 1978; Riva & Casolati 1984).
`In a ‘randomised, double-blind, crossover trial of
`
`30 patients with detrusor instability, Moisey et al.
`(1980) compared oxybutynin 5mg 3 times daily
`with placebo. The study was completed by 23
`patients; 5 withdrew because of severe side effects.
`Of the patients who completed the trial, 17 (69%)
`
`had symptomatic improvement and nine had im-
`provement on urodynamic assessment. The effect
`of oxybutynin in the management of idiopathic de-
`trusor instability in women was studied by Car-
`dozo et al. (1987) in a double-blind, fixed-dose,
`
`placebo-controlled trial. Oxybutynin was signifi-
`cantly better than placebo in improving lower ur-
`inary tract symptoms and urodynamic parameters.
`However, 8 of 20 women receiving oxybutynin
`stopped medication because of side effects and of
`those completing active therapy 30% suffered sig-
`nificant side effects, of dry mouth or dry skin.
`Oxybutynin has a well-documented therapeutic
`effect in bladder hyperactivity, although it is also
`associated with a high incidence of side effects.
`These are typically anticholinergic in nature and
`are often dose-limiting. It might,
`therefore, be
`questioned whether oxybutynin in the dosage usu-
`ally used clinically (Sing 3 times daily) has other
`than anticholinergic actions.
`
`Dicyclomine
`In addition to a direct relaxant effect on smooth
`
`muscle dicyclomine also has an anticholinergic ac-
`tion (Downie et al. 1977; Johns et al. 1976; Khanna
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2068 - 0005
`
`

`
`482
`Treatment of Disorders of Micturition
`
`
`et al. 1979). It relaxed carbachol-contracted iso-
`lated human bladder muscle and displaced 3H-QNB
`(3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) fi‘om muscarinic bind-
`ing sites in homogenates of human bladder muscle,
`but was less potent than oxybutynin (Nilvebrant et
`
`al. 1985). Beck et al. ([976) compared the effects
`of 3 times daily administration of dicyclomine
`
`10mg, propantheline 15mg or placebo for 3 weeks
`in 43 patients with detrusor overactivity. They
`i found that in the placebo group 20% were cured or
`improved. Corresponding figures for propantheline
`bromide and dicylomine were 73% and 62%, re-
`spectively. Awad et al. (1977) reported, in a pre-
`liminary study, that dicyclomine 20mg 3 times daily
`
`caused a resolution or significant improvement of
`symptoms in 24 of 27 patients with uninhibited
`bladder contractions. Side effects were few, mainly
`
`anticholinergic in nature, and did not necessitate
`withdrawal from the study. In another preliminary
`study of 14 patients with uninhibited neurogenic
`bladder, Fischer et al.
`(1978) reported that ii
`patients showed a significant blockade of uninhi-
`bited bladder contractions when given dicyclomine
`as a single 20mg oral dose.
`Published experiences on the effect of dicyclom-
`inc on uninhibited bladder contractions are fa-
`
`vourable. However, controlled clinical trials docu-
`
`menting its efficacy and side effects are scarce.
`
`Terodiline
`
`Terodiline has been shown to possess both anti-
`
`cholinergic and calcium antagonistic properties
`within the same concentration range (Husted et al.
`1980; Larsson-Backstrom et al. 1985; flstergaard et
`
`al. 1980). Several controlled trials have demon-
`strated beneficial effects of the drug in patients with
`motor urge incontinence (for example, Ekman et
`
`al. 1980; Gerstenberg et al. 1986; Lukkarinen et al.
`1987; Macfarlane & Tolley 1984; Peters et al. 1984;
`Sole & Arkell 1984; Tapp el al. 1987; Ulmsten et
`al. 1985).
`Tapp et al. (1987) perfonned a double-blind,
`randomised multicentre study of 91 women with
`
`detrusor instability. The dosage of the drug was in-
`dividually titrated (25 to 50 to 75mg daily). Com-
`pared with the placebo group, significant improve-
`
`ments were found in total
`frequency, daytime
`frequency, daytime and total
`incontinence epi-
`sodes and the voided volumes in the treated group.
`
`Significantly more patients (62%) in the treated
`group considered themselves slightly or markedly
`improved than in the control group (42%). There
`was no difference in the total number of side ef-
`
`fects between the 2 groups. These results are in
`
`agreement with those obtained in another multi-
`centre study of 89 women with urinary frequency
`
`and motor urge incontinence (Peters et al. 1984).
`The eifects of terodiline (37.5 to 75mg daily)
`were evaluated in 24 women with motor urge in-
`continence,
`l2 in a double-blind crossover study
`
`and [2 in a subsequent long term study (6 months
`
`to 3 years). All but 2 patients in the double-blind
`study and all in the long term study reported im-
`provement when on terodiline treatment (Ulmsten
`
`et al. 1985). Side effects (mainly dryness of mouth),
`
`not necessitating discontinuation of treatment, were
`
`reported by 4 patients in the double-blind study
`
`and by 6 in the long term study. Gerstenberg et al.
`(1986) treated 18 females with detrusor instability
`with terodiline 25mg twice daily or placebo in a
`double-blind crossover study. Patient preference for
`
`terodiline was statistically significant. The 24-hour
`micturition frequency was significantly reduced,
`volume at first sensation increased and volume at
`
`first contraction increased. No serious side effects
`
`occurred. 25 geriatric patients (17 women and 8
`men) with severe motor urge incontinence were
`treated with terodiline and the polysynaptic inhib-
`itor meladrazin, separately and in combination
`
`(Beisland & Fossberg 1985). Urodynamically sig-
`nificant improvement was found only with tero-
`
`diline, there being no further improvement with
`added meladrazin. Because meladrazin caused a
`
`high incidence of side effects, treatment with ter-
`odiline separately was recommended.
`The clinical effectiveness of terodiline in patients
`
`with motor urge incontinence is well documented
`and, in the usual dose range (25 to 75mg daily), it
`is well tolerated (Fischer-Rasmussen et al. 1984).
`
`Clinically, the anticholinergic properties of tero-
`diline seem to dominate (Andersson 1984).
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2068 - 0006
`
`

`
`483
`Treatment of Disorders of Micturition
`
`
`Imipramine
`The complex pharmacological effects of imipra-
`
`tions, but favourable effects were reported in open
`studies with terbutaline (Lindholm & Lose 1986;
`
`mine include marked systemic anticholinergic ac-
`tions (Baldessarini 1985). However, the mechan-
`ism behind its effect on the bladder has not been
`
`established. Imipramine exerts a marked direct in-
`hibitory effect on the detrusor; its antimuscarinic
`effect on bladder muscle seems rather weak (Ben-
`son et al. 1977; Dhattiwala 1976; Fredericks et al.
`
`1978; Olubadewo 1980; Tulloch & Creed 1979).
`Although other tricyclic antidepressants have
`been reported to be effective in bladder instability
`(Martin & Schiif 1984; Nissenkorn et al. 1986) im-
`
`ipramine is the only drug that has been widely used
`clinically to treat this disorder.
`No effect was found when imipramine 25 to
`
`75mg was given intmrnuscularly to l l patients with
`uncontrolled detrusor contractions (Diokno et al.
`
`1972). However, in elderly patients with detrusor
`instability who received oral imipramine in doses
`up to 150mg daily good effects were reported (Cas-
`tleden et al. 1981). Raezer et al. (1977) found that
`a combination of propantheline and imipramine
`
`was particularly useful. It has also been known for
`a long time that imipramine can have favourable
`effects in the treatmentof nocturnal enuresis in
`
`children (Kunin et al. 1970; Noack 1964).
`It is well established that therapeutic doses of
`
`tricyclic antidepressants including imipramine may
`cause serious toxic effects on the cardiovascular
`
`system (orthostatic hypotension, ventricular ar-
`
`rhythmias). Children seem particularly sensitive to
`their cardiotoxic action (see Baldessarini 1985). This
`should be taken into consideration when prescrib-
`
`ing these drugs as a treatment for bladder instab-
`ility and enuresis.
`
`1.1.4 ,6’~AdrenocepIor Agonists
`Isolated human bladder muscle contracted by
`means of acctylcholine, for example, can be effec-
`tively relaxed by .8-adrenoceptor agonists (Larsen
`
`1979; Nergeirdh et al. 1977). In vivo it has been
`shown that administration offi-adrenoceptor agon-
`ists can increase bladder capacity in man (Norlén
`
`et al. 1978). Few investigations have been per-
`formed in patients with unstable detrusor contrac-
`
`Norton et al. 1978) and in a controlled trial with
`clenbuterol (Griineberger 1984). In a double-blind
`
`investigation clenbuterol 0.0lmg 3 times daily was
`shown to have a good therapeutic effect in l5 of
`20 women with motor urge incontinence (Grime-
`
`berger 1984). Four patients reported trembling of
`fingers and tachycardia and 3 complained of nerv-
`ousness. None had to stop treatment.
`
`Other investigators, however, have not been able
`
`to confirm that B-adrenoceptor agonists represent
`an effective therapeutic principle.
`In 6 elderly
`patients with unstable bladder, Castleden and Mor-
`
`gan (1980) found no beneficial effects of intraven-
`ous salbutamol (albuterol) [4 pg/kg]. In addition,
`oral therapy (4mg 3 times daily) for 2 weeks in 2
`patients had no clinically detectable effect. Naglo
`et al. (1981) gave isoprenaline (isoproterenol) sub-
`cutaneously (0.2 to l.0rng) to 9 patients (aged 3 to
`
`17 years) with myelodysplasia and detrusor hyper-
`activity. No effect on the detrusor activity was ob-
`served.
`
`The therapeutic efficacy of 3-adrenoceptor
`
`agonists for the inhibition of bladder hyperactivity
`has not been established, but available information
`
`does not exclude the possibility that they may pro-
`
`vidc a therapeutic alternative in some patient
`groups.
`
`1.1.5 a-A drenoceptor Antagonists
`Stimulation of as-adrenoeeptors in isolated hu-
`man bladder muscle produces no or a weak con-
`
`tractile effect (Awad et al. 1974). Noradrenaline in-
`hibits the response to electrical stimulation in
`human detrusor muscle, probably by effects on both
`a- and B-adrenoceptors (/lmarlt et al. I986). Stimu-
`lation of at-adrenoceptors on cholinergic neurons
`may lead to a decreased release of aoetylcholine,
`and stimulation of postjunctional 5-adrenooeptors
`to relaxation of the detrusor muscle. Normal dog
`bladder reacts to noradrenaline with relaxation, but
`
`after outflow obstruction has been established, nor-
`adrenaline produces contraction (Rohner et al.
`1978). In 11 of 47 patients with benign prostatic
`hypertrophy and outflow obstniction, Perlberg and
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2068 - 0007
`
`

`
`484
`Treatment of Disorders of Micturition
`
`
`Caine (1982) found a contractile effect of noradren-
`aline mediated by stimulation of as-adrenoceptors
`on the detrusor muscle. In some patients with be-
`
`nign prostatic hypertrophy, treated with phenoxy-
`benzamine or prazosin for improving outflow re-
`sistance (see section 2.2.1), simultaneous bladder
`instability was reduced or abolished (Gerstenberg
`et al. 1980-, Hedlund et al. I983; Reuther & Aa-
`
`gaard 1984). In both short term and long term
`treatment of 9 patients with uninhibited detrusor
`contractions secondary to multiple sclerosis and
`
`myelopathy, Jensen (1981) found prazosin to be
`effective.
`
`The value of n:-adrenoceptor antagonists in the
`
`treatment of bladder hyperactivity is still to be es-
`tablished and further clinical investigations of dif-
`ferent patient groups are necessary.
`
`1.1.6 Prostaglandin Synthesis Inhibitors
`It has been demonstrated that human bladder
`
`mucosa has the ability to synthesise eicosanoids
`
`(Jeremy et al. 1987), and that these agents can be
`liberated from bladder muscle and mucosa in re-
`
`sponse to different types of trauma (Downie &
`Karmazyn 1984; Leslie et al. 1934). Even if pros-
`
`taglandins cause contraction of human bladder
`muscle (Andersson & Forman 1978) it is still un-
`clear whether prostaglandins contribute to the
`
`ported to give symptomatic relief in patients with
`detrusor instability (Cardozo & Stanton 1980). The
`incidence of side effects was high, occurring in 19
`of 32 patients. However, no patient had to stop
`treatment because of side effects.
`
`There have been few clinical trials on the effects
`
`of prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors in the treat-
`ment of unstable detrusor contractions, and their
`therapeutic value has not been established.
`
`1.1.7 Other Drugs
`
`Baclofen
`Baclofen has been shown to have favourable ef-
`
`fects on detrusor hyper-reflexia secondary to le-
`sions of the spinal cord (Kiesswetter & Schober
`1975; Roussan et al. 1975). The drug may also be
`an alternative in the treatment of idiopathic detru-
`sor hyperactivity (Taylor & Bates 1979). However,
`published experience with the drug is limited.
`
`Desmopressin
`
`Desmopressin (1-desamino-8-D-arginine vaso-
`pressin; DDAVP) is a synthetic vasopressin ana-
`logue with a pronounced antidiuretic effect but
`practically lacking vasopressor actions (Andersson
`et al. 1988). It has for several years been used in
`the treatment of diabetes insipidus and also in in-
`
`pathogenesis of unstable detrusor contractions.
`More important than direct effects on the bladder
`
`vestigations of the renal concentration capacity.
`Desmopressin has a longer duration of action than
`
`muscle may be sensitisation of sensory afferent
`nerves, increasing the afferent input produced by
`a given degree of bladder filling. Involuntary blad-
`der contractions can then be triggered at a small
`bladder volume. If this is an important mechan-
`ism, treatment with prostaglandin synthesis inhib-
`itors could be expected to be effective.
`
`In a double-blind controlled study of 30 women
`with detrusor instability the prostaglandin synthe-
`sis inhibitor flurbiprofen at a dosage of 50mg 3
`times daily was shown to have favourable effects,
`although it did not completely abolish detrusor hy-
`peractivity (Cardozo et al. 1980). There was a high
`
`incidence of side effects (43%) including nausea,
`vomiting, headache and gastrointestinal symp-
`toms. Indomethacin S0 to 100mg daily was re-
`
`atgipressin (arginine vasopressin) or lypressin (lys-
`ine vasopressin) and at a clinical dosage there are
`practically no side effects. By decreasing the noc-
`turnal production of urine, beneficial effects may
`be obtained in enuresis and nocturia. Several con-
`
`trolled double-blind investigations have shown the
`drug to be effective in the treatment of enuresis in
`
`children (Aiadjem et al. 1982; Birkasova et al. 1978;
`Post et al. 1983), and also in adults (Delaere &
`
`Strijbos 1987; Hilton & Stanton 1982; Ramsden et
`al. 1982). The dose used in most studies has been
`20,ug desmopressin intranasally at bedtime.
`
`A controlled study in malepatients with benign
`prostatic hypertrophy and significant nocturia
`showed that desmopressin reduced the number of
`nocturnal urinations, but the change was hardly
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2068 - 0008
`
`

`
`485
`Treatment of Disorders of Micturition
`
`
`clinically relevant (Ménsson et al. 1980). Noctur-
`nal frequency and enuresis due to bladder instab-
`
`ility responded favourably to intranasal desmo-
`pressin therapy even when previous treatment with
`‘antispasmodics' had been unsuccessful (Hilton &
`Stanton 1982;

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket