throbber
~--SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
`
`Overactive Bladder Significantly Affects Quality of Life
`
`Paul Abrams, MD; C.]. Kelleher, MD, MRCOG; Lindsey A. Kerr, MD; and Rebecca G. Rogers, MD
`
`Presentation Summary
`()veractivc bladder (OAB), with
`symptoms of frequency, urgency,
`and urge incontinence, substan-
`tially affects the lives of millions of
`people. The symptoms associated
`with OAB can significantly affect
`the social, psychological, occupa-
`tional, domestic, physical, and
`sexual aspects of those who suffer
`from it. Unfortunately, many suf-
`ferers are reluctant
`to discuss
`their condition with their health-
`
`care provider or family members.
`As a result, OAB remains underre-
`ported, despite increased aware-
`
`ness and improved diagnosis and
`treatment.
`lIealth—relatcd quality
`of life can be measured objective-
`ly, and several instruments have
`been developed, validated, and
`used in research. Currently, there
`are 2 major types of quality-of-life
`questionnaires: generic and dis-
`ease specific. Although these ques-
`tionnaires have been helpful and
`are widely used,
`the goal
`is to
`establish a single questionnaire
`that is acceptable throughout the
`world for use by urologists, gyne-
`cologists, urogyneeologists, geria-
`tricians, and epidemiologists.
`
`veractive bladder (OAB) is a
`
`0 major cause of suffering in
`
`requiring
`patients,
`many
`long-term therapy to maintain symp-
`tom relief. Although OAB can affect
`anyone at any age,
`the prevalence
`tends to increase with advancing age.‘
`The symptoms are associated with
`significant social, psychological, occu-
`pational, domestic, and physical stig-
`mas. Patients who suffer from OAB
`
`focus on and may be preoccupied
`with such concerns as locating the
`closest bathroom,
`looking for aisle
`seating, and estimating the amount of
`time until
`their next work break.
`
`Furthermore, OAB affects daily activ-
`ities, such as travel, physical activity,
`
`function, and
`relationships, sexual
`nocturnal bladder control, which can
`affect sleep.
`
`Impact of OAB
`It is estimated that at least 17 mil-
`
`lion Americans are affected by OAB;
`however, the prevalence is difficult to
`estimate because few surveys have
`measured symptoms of urgency and
`frequency with or without urge incon-
`tinencef OAB is characterized by
`symptoms of urgency (a
`sudden,
`strong desire to urinate),
`frequency
`(urinating more than 8 times in 24
`hours), or urge incontinence (sudden
`and involuntary loss of urine), alone or
`in combination. Both urinary inconti-
`
`S580
`
`THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE
`
`JULY 2000
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2063 - 0001
`
`

`
`QUALITY or LIFE
`
`nenee and urgency/frequency have
`been shown to affect a patients physi-
`cal, social, and emotional well-being.
`Unfortunately, many people do not
`seek medical help because they mis-
`takenly believe that bladder control
`problems are an inevitable part of
`aging and that there is no treatment
`available or they are too embarrassed
`to discuss their problem with their
`healthcare provider. Of those sufferers
`who seek medical attention, it is esti-
`mated that 30% receive no assessment
`
`of their symptoms and approximately
`80% are not treated?
`
`In a European survey conducted by
`SIFO Research and Consulting AB,‘ it
`was found that OAB adversely affect-
`ed the lives of the majority of respon-
`dents with symptoms of (JAB (65% to
`67%).
`In addition, 60% found the
`symptoms bothersome enough to
`consult
`a medical
`practitioner.
`
`Interestingly, frequency and urgency
`were almost as common as urge
`incontinence as a reason for seeking
`help. Most important, only half the
`respondents with OAB said they were
`likely to discuss the problem with
`their healthcare provider again, pro-
`viding
`additional
`evidence
`that
`although many people find the symp-
`toms troubling,
`the disease remains
`vastly underreported.
`
`Paticnt's Perception
`Studies have shown that patients
`with OAB have a significantly poorer
`quality of life than age-nlatched popu-
`lations. For instance, using the patient-
`administered Short Form 36 (SF-36)
`quality—of—life questionnaire, patients
`who suffer from (JAB were found to
`
`have a lower quality of life in the social
`and functional domains than patients
`with diabetes (Figure 1).“ Many people
`
`Figure 1. Comparison of Quality—of-Life Scores in Patients with OAB, Diabetes, and
`Normal Subjects
`
`90
`
`
`
`80
`
`70
`
`60
`
`50
`
`ShortForm-36Score
`
`
`
`IIuI|IlII contra] group
`— — - Diabetes
`
`
`
`ts
`‘:9
`4‘
`
`£\°°
`(‘G
`Q»
`3
`0&9
`9
`
`as
`<5: oi‘
`0- %
`z~’< ea
`Q9‘ @
`
`Q9
`\
`‘'3
`6°
`
`Source: Abrams P, Wein AJ. The Overactive Bladder: A Widespread But Trearable Cono’irr'on.
`Stockhom, Sweden: Erik Sparre Medical AB; 1998. Reprinted with permission.
`
`VOL. 6, NO. 1], SUP.
`
`THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE
`
`S581
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2063 - 0002
`
`

`
`SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
`
`with OAB tend to stop pursuing many
`of
`the social and physical activities
`they have enjoyed for much of their
`lives, enduring OAB and its symptoms
`in silence because they are too embar-
`rassed to talk about it or are unaware
`that it can be treated.
`The most common reactions to
`
`urinary incontinence are embarrass-
`ment,
`frustration, anxiety, annoy-
`ance, depression, and fear of odor. To
`cope with symptoms of OAB, many
`sufferers develop elaborate behaviors
`(coping mechanisms) aimed at hiding
`and managing urine loss, such as:
`
`I Limiting daily travel to places and
`routes where they know the loca-
`tions of all restrooms
`
`0 Reducing fluid intake
`0 Avoiding sexual intimacy
`0 “fearing adult incontinence pads
`or diapers
`0 Preferring to drive themselves
`everywhere, so they can control
`bathroom stops
`- Carrying extra clothes and diapers
`everywhere they go, in the event
`of a wetting accident
`
`Table 1. Selected Quotations Related to Quality-of-Life Issues
`
`Feelings
`I ”I have lost control over my bodily functions, and I resent it.”
`I ’’I'm just wet, and I feel like a child."
`I "You're scared to stand next to people. You're afraid the urine smell is there.”
`I ”There are times when I just sit and cry because I get so frustrated with it."
`Activities
`I "I no longer plan activities, unless I know I will have access to a restroom.”
`I ’’I keep sending my resumes out, and I keep thinking I'm gonna blow the
`interview because I have to go to the bathroom.”
`I ”My boss asked people if I was doing drugs in the bathroom.”
`I ’’I was a big runner and tennis player. That's difficult to do any more."
`
`a hermit.”
`
`Relationships
`I "This problem overshadows my sex life."
`I ’’I don't want to be away from my house. My son says, ‘You're becoming
`
`Source: Adapted and reprinted with permission from Brown IS, Subak LL, Gras
`J, et al. Urge incontinence: The patient's perspective. 1 Women's Health
`l998;7:1263-1269.
`
`- Wearing dark, often baggy clothing
`to hide wet spots andfor conceal
`adult diapers
`- Sitting on the aisle at the theater
`and on planes to have easier
`access to the bathroom
`
`- Sitting closest to the door for easi-
`er access to the bathroom.
`
`Quality-of-Life Issues Affecting
`Women
`
`In a series of focus groups composed
`of women of diverse ages and racial
`and ethnic backgrounds who suffered
`from urge incontinence, it was shown
`that
`the effects of incontinence on
`
`quality of life correlated with frequen-
`cy, nocturia, and pad uses‘ It was also
`shown that 24% of respondents wor-
`ried about bathroom availability, 14%
`about loss of control, 11% about anxi-
`ety, and 10% about sleep disturbances.
`Compared with older women (270
`years), those younger than 70 years of
`age were more likely to report feelings
`of unattractiveness and low self-esteem
`
`(12% vs 2%; P < 0.007), as well as
`adverse effects on dating and sexual
`activity (45% vs 0%; P < 0.02). Table 1
`lists several comments of the focus
`
`group participants.
`In a study conducted by Lam and
`colleagues,“ the reduction in social
`contacts and activities in 511 women
`
`(30 to 59 years of age) with stress,
`urge, mixed, or nonspecific urinary
`incontinence was evaluated using a
`study—specific questionnaire. Across
`all types of incontinence, 99 women
`(19.4%) reported avoiding at least 1
`social activity, and 32 women (6.3%)
`avoided more than 1 type of social
`activity. Five women (1%) abstained
`from work, 14 (2.7%) from visiting
`friends, 18 (3.5%) from going to the
`movies, 80 (15.7%) from sports, and
`16 (3.1%)
`from shopping. Although
`urinary incontinence does not appear
`to be a socially disabling condition, it
`may have a substantial impact on the
`everyday lives of women.
`According to research presented by
`Roe and colleagues,’ those who suffer
`
`S582
`
`THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE
`
`JULY 2000
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2063 - 0003
`
`

`
`---QUALITY or LIFE
`
`from urinary incontinence are more
`likely to need assistance with their
`activities of daily living. When com-
`pared with those respondents who
`were continent, people suffering from
`incontinence were significantly more
`likely to need help with cooking,
`housework, shopping, or their laundry.
`It was also shown that respondents
`who were incontinent were significant-
`ly more likely to need help with per-
`sonal care, such as dressing, feeding,
`bathing, or going to the toilet,
`than
`respondents who were continent.
`In a questionnaire surveying the
`prevalence of urinary incontinence
`and its influence on quality of life, it
`was shown that women with urinary
`incontinence reported a poorer quality
`of
`life compared with continent
`women (P < 0.01).” “(omen with urge
`incontinence and women with mixed
`
`incontinence reported a poorer quality
`of life than women with stress inconti-
`
`nence (P < 005). Only 6% of the
`women surveyed had sought medical
`attention for urinary incontinence.
`
`Quality-of-Life Issues Affecting Men
`There are few studies that address
`
`the impact of incontinence on quality
`of life in men. According to Lenderking
`and colleagues,” incontinence causes
`greater impairment in physical func-
`tioning in men than in women. In a
`self-assessment questionnaire address-
`ing quality of life in 50 men (mean age,
`67 years),
`it was shown that 26% of
`men with moderate-to-severe inconti-
`
`nence had severely limited their phys-
`ical activities.”
`
`In a random sample that included
`1883 men (230 years of age), the con-
`sequences of incontinence were exam-
`ined,
`in addition to its prevalence.”
`Thirty-six percent of
`incontinent
`respondents believed that the disorder
`had affected their lifestyle a great deal
`or fair amount, and only 2.3% believed
`there had been no effect. Only 30% to
`45% of the respondents felt very confi-
`dent in major activities of social life;
`however, activities were curtailed to a
`
`greater degree in men and the elderly
`compared with women and younger
`individuals. The general activity re-
`strictions imposed by incontinence
`included drinking less when going out
`(35%), making a conscious effort
`to
`locate a public restroom (33%), going
`out less (15%), and restricting certain
`activities, such as lifting (10%).
`
`Seeking Medical Attention
`The Special Committee on Aging in
`the United States has identified uri-
`
`nary incontinence as one of the top 4
`important health-related quality-of-
`life problems affecting senior citizens
`(others include Alzheimer’s disease,
`loss of vision, and osteoporosis and
`fractures). Nevertheless, many suffer-
`ers have a misconception that urinary
`incontinence is an effect of aging,
`which has a negative impact on their
`decision to seek treatment.” In a sur-
`
`vey conducted to examine the occur-
`rence, attitudes, and knowledge about
`urinary incontinence among women
`55 years of age and older, respondents
`were not likely to seek help if they
`perceived urinary incontinence to be
`an inevitable outcome of advancing
`age and believed that no beneficial
`therapies were available.
`Instead,
`they were more likely to try to adjust
`their
`lifestyles
`to
`compensate.
`Although attempts to compensate for
`mild urinary incontinence may have
`little impact on lifestyle, quality of life
`and general health may be impaired
`when an individual
`limits
`social
`and/or recreational activities because
`
`of more severe urinary incontinence.
`As a result of this study,” it has
`been suggested that education on
`lower urinary tract health be provided
`to both the general public and to
`healthcare providers. Public educa-
`tion should focus on the fact that the
`
`occurrence of frequency, urgency,
`and urge incontinence is not a normal
`part of aging and that effective treat-
`ment methods
`are
`available.
`
`Furthermore, healthcare providers
`should be taught how to make basic
`
`VOL. 6, NO. 11, SUI’.
`
`THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE
`
`S583
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2063 - 0004
`
`

`
`SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
`
`continence assessments and informed
`
`of the available treatment options.
`In its role as an advocacy group for
`those with incontinence, the National
`Association for Continence (NAFC),
`reported results of a member survey.“
`There was a 1.9% rate of return from
`
`detailed questionnaires mailed to
`98,000 subscribers. Most respondents
`were covered by health insurance
`(Medicare, 61.3%; managed care orga-
`nizations, 25%; Medicaid, 5.7%; no
`insurance, 2.4%). Consumer satisfac-
`tion with treatment of incontinence
`
`was very low, with 64% reporting that
`they were not satisfied with treatment.
`Dissatisfaction corresponded to over-
`all general health and type of inconti-
`nence, with those who had good
`health or less severe incontinence
`
`tending to be more satisfied with treat-
`ment outcomes. Those with stress or
`mixed incontinence were more satis-
`fied with treatment than those with
`
`urge incontinence. It was shown that
`younger respondents (36 to 45 years
`of age) were as dissatisfied and unhap-
`py with their treatment outcomes
`those 65 years of age and older.”
`The majority of respondents (51%)
`rated conservative and behavioral
`
`treatment, such as pelvic muscle
`exercises, bladder retraining, and diet
`modification, as being most helpful;
`
`Figure 2. Consumer Response to Outcome of Therapies
`(Behavioral and Pharmacotherapeutic) for Urinary Incontinence
`
` Cured
`
`E] Worse
`
`5ource:Verdel| L ed. Consumer Focus "99:/"1 Survey. Spartanburg, South Carolina:
`National Association for Continence; 1999. Reprinted with permission from the
`National Association for Continence and the Alliance for Aging Research.
`
`I lm proved
`
`43%
`
`No change
`
`respondents observed no
`43% of
`change in outcome from their most
`helpful treatment; and only 3% report-
`ed being cured (Figure 2). These fig-
`ures probably underrepresent
`the
`actual percentage of patients who
`benefit from treatment because those
`
`who elected to participate in the
`NAFC and respond to the survey are
`likely to be those who remained
`incontinent. Nevertheless, this survey
`indicates that there is a gap in the
`expectations patients have of current
`therapies and suggests that improved
`communications are needed regard-
`ing treatment options and anticipated
`outcomes between patients
`and
`healthcare providers.
`
`lomplianee With Therapy
`Although behavioral
`therapy has
`been shown to be highly effective (80%
`cure rate) in patients with OAB,” non-
`compliance outside the clinical
`trial
`setting limits its long-term efficacy.
`Some patients will comply better with
`pharmacotherapy than behavioral
`modifications, unless they experience
`adverse effects or a complicated regi-
`men is prescribed. In addition, if the
`prescribed therapy comes from a spe-
`cialist and the patient receives long-
`tenn management
`from his or her
`primary care physician, acceptance of
`the plan of therapy by the primary care
`physician is another often overlooked
`factor
`that
`influences compliance.
`importantly,
`if patients perceive an
`improvement in their quality of life as
`a result of therapy, they are more like-
`ly to comply.
`Overactive bladder is a chronic
`
`condition that often requires long-
`term therapy.
`Ilowever,
`there is a
`lack of outcome data on the manage-
`ment of patients over extended peri-
`ods of
`time, as well as
`limited
`information on long-term compliance
`with therapy for OAB. Most compli-
`anee data con1e fron1 clinical trials,
`which do not provide an accurate
`assessment of adherence in the
`
`everyday world.
`
`S584
`
`THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE
`
`JULY 2000
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2063 - 0005
`
`

`
`Oxybutynin is an effective agent for
`managing the symptoms of OAB; how-
`ever, dry mouth occurs in about 50% of
`patients, contributing to an overall dis-
`continuation rate up to 27% of patients
`in clinical
`trials.” A study of 348
`women with OAB from the United
`
`that compliance
`Kingdom suggests
`rates with oxybutynin in clinical prac-
`tice are even lower.” A total of 73.6% of
`
`women with a mean age of 50.7 years
`responded to a survey at 6 and 12
`months after referral to a specialist for
`urinary symptoms. Most patients
`(83.5%) had been prescribed oxybu—
`tynin. At 6 months, even though only
`5.5% of respondents reported complete
`resolution of all their urinary symp-
`toms, a dismal 18.2% remained on ther-
`apy. The occurrence of side effects was
`reported as the reason for discontinua-
`tion of therapy by 39.8% of women.
`Lack of efficacy did not seem to play a
`major role, because 71.9% of women
`considered drug therapy to be effective.
`A follow-up study was conducted to
`evaluate whether commencing oxybu-
`tynin therapy at a lower dose with
`written instructions
`for gradually
`increasing the dose would result
`in
`improved compliance ((J..I. Kelleher,
`unpublished data). Ninety-six women
`with OAB were randomly prescribed
`oxybutynin, 2.5 mg twice daily or 5 mg
`at bedtime, with instructions
`to
`increase the dose to 5 mg 3 times daily
`over 6 weeks. Of
`the 96 women
`
`enrolled, 66 responded to a question-
`naire 2 years later. Similar to the previ-
`ous study, a high percentage of women
`(66.7%) were no longer taking oxybu—
`tynin, of whom 63.6% had discontinued
`therapy after 2 months. Of those who
`stopped therapy, 43.2% reported that it
`was due to side effects. Thus,
`lower
`dosage and slow titration did not sub-
`stantially improve compliance.
`In clinical
`trials,
`tolterodine 2 mg
`twice daily has been demonstrated to
`have a lower rate of dry mouth and dis-
`continuation because of dry mouth
`than oxybutynin 5 mg 3 times daily,”"‘”
`which may result in improved compli-
`
`QUALITY or LIFE
`
`long—term studies are
`ance. Ilowever,
`needed to determine whether this
`
`improved tolerability results in better
`compliance.
`
`Evaluating Sexual Functioning
`It should be no surprise that incon-
`tinence or the fear of leaking urine
`would interfere with sexual function;
`however, studies evaluating the bur-
`den of OAB on sexual quality of life
`
`It should he no surprise that incontinence or
`the fear of leaking urine would interfere with
`sexual function; however, studies evaluating
`the burden of OAB on sexual quality of life
`are scarce.
`
`are scarce. Of the studies that have
`
`evaluated the impact of OAB on sexu-
`al functioning, only 1
`incorporated
`the use of validated questionnaires to
`determine quality-of-life measures.
`There are some problems with
`using general rather than condition-
`specific questionnaires, however. For
`example, \Veber and colleagues” com-
`pared sexual function in women with
`and without uterovaginal prolapse
`and urinary incontinence. Using mul-
`tivariate analysis, increasing age was
`the only significant factor predictive
`of poorer sexual function. The general
`questionnaire used in this study may
`not have been sensitive enough to
`detect differences in function in this
`
`specific population.
`In an effort to have a specific, vali-
`dated, and reliable questionnaire to
`evaluate sexual functioning in this
`population, Rogers and Kammerer
`have developed the Pelvic Organ
`Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Ques-
`tionnaire (PISQE; R. Rogers, unpub-
`lished
`data). This
`questionnaire
`consists of 31 questions in 3 domains:
`behavioral-emotive, physical, and part-
`
`VOL. 6, NO. 1], SUP.
`
`THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE
`
`S585
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2063 - 0006
`
`

`
`SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
`
`ner related. The PISQ has been shown
`to have high internal consistency, test
`and retest reliability, and a good corre-
`lation with the Sexual History Form-12
`(SIIF-12), another questionnaire often
`used in urogynecologic research.
`In
`clinical studies, the PISQ has been able
`to distinguish between patients with
`and without sexual dysfunction (R.
`Rogers, unpublished data).
`The PISQ was applied to 139 sexu-
`ally active women. Patients provided
`information regarding pelvic organ
`prolapse or urinary incontinence; self-
`reports were not confirmed by physical
`examination. There were significant
`differences in PISQ scores among
`women with incontinence compared
`with those without
`incontinence.
`
`Specifically, although the desired fre-
`quency of
`intercourse was similar
`between patients with and without
`incontinence, the actual frequency of
`intercourse was
`significantly less
`among patients with incontinence
`than among those without
`inconti-
`nence. Patients with incontinence or
`
`prolapse reported having previous loss
`of urine with intercourse and restrict-
`
`ing sexual activity for fear of losing
`urine during it. Additionally, patients
`with incontinence reported significant-
`ly more dyspareunia and vaginal dry-
`ness,
`regardless
`of
`their use
`of
`hormone replacement
`therapy com-
`
`Table 2. Differences in Sexual Function
`
`UI/POP
`n = 83 (%)
`
`No UI/POP
`n = 56 (%)
`
`Vaginal dryness 96
`
`Frequency
`Desired (>monthly)
`Actual (>month|y)
`Loss of urine with sex
`
`Dyspareunia
`Restrict sexual activity
`
`71
`45
`42
`27
`70
`
`100
`95
`14
`24
`4
`46
`
`pared with patients without inconti-
`nenee or prolapse. These results sup-
`port a relationship between OAB and
`poor sexual functioning (Table 2).
`
`Assessing Quality of Life
`Evaluation of the severity of OAB
`normally involves a record of urinary
`symptom scores, a bladder diary, and,
`in select cases, objective urodynamic
`data. Although these are essential
`clinical measures, they provide little
`information regarding the impact on a
`patient’s life. Many other factors play
`a role in OAB, so it is important to
`include an evaluation of quality of life
`in clinical
`trials.
`In measuring the
`quality of life associated with OAB, it
`is vital to examine both severity and
`duration as well as to establish the
`
`correct diagnosis. In developing any
`definitive instrument to assess quality
`of life in both men and women, an in-
`depth interview with the patient
`should be conducted, with discussion
`of such areas as sleep, emotional, sex-
`ual, and social
`functioning. Within
`emotional
`functioning, self-esteem,
`anxiety over hygiene (ie, odor) and
`having incontinent episodes, sadness,
`health preoccupation, and helpless-
`ness all appear to be important issues
`for those who suffer from OAB.
`
`is
`it
`functioning,
`Within social
`essential to assess work less, socializ-
`ing, and activity avoidance. In addi-
`tion,
`the use of the word “bother”
`may be more appropriate than that of
`“problem” in quality-of-life evalua-
`tions, because patients may find
`symptoms bothersome but may not
`consider them problematic,
`in that
`they are not associated with serious
`illness or mortality.
`Quality of life can be measured
`objectively, and several instruments
`for such measurement have been
`
`developed, validated, and used exten-
`sively. Currently, there are 2 major
`types of quality-of-life questionnaires:
`generic and disease specific.
`Generic quality-of-life question-
`naires (eg, Medical Outcome Study
`
`Source: R. Rogers, unpublished observations.
`UI : urinary incontinence; POP : pelvic organ prolapse.
`
`S586
`
`THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE
`
`JULY 2000
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2063 - 0007
`
`

`
`---QUALITY or LIFE
`
`Short Forms 36 and 20 [MOS SF-36,
`SF-20], European Quality of Life Scale
`[Euro-QOL], and Sickness
`Impact
`Profile) offer some advantages because
`tlley are reliable, validated,
`readily
`available, and useful
`in assessing a
`broad range of populations and ages in
`many
`different
`disease
`states.
`Ilowever,
`the problem with using
`generic questionnaires is that results
`are often insensitive to the specific
`condition measured and therefore fail
`
`to address many of the issues relevant
`to the disease. As a result disease-spe-
`cific instruments are more beneficial
`
`in evaluating the impact of a specific
`lower urinary tract symptom on quali-
`ty of life and are more sensitive than
`their generic counterparts in detecting
`changes as a result of treatment. The
`Incontinence Impact Questionnaire,
`the Urinary Distress Inventory,
`the
`York Incontinence Perception Scale,
`the Incontinence Quality of Life
`Index,
`and
`the King’s
`Ilealth
`Questionnaire (KIIQ) are several
`instruments that have been developed
`specifically for urinary incontinence.
`\Vith the exception of the KIIQ, the
`disadvantage in using a disease-specif-
`ic questionnaire to evaluate quality of
`life is that other health dimensions,
`including psychological aspects, are
`not assessed, and comparisons with
`other diseases cannot be made.
`
`The King's Health Questionnaire
`The KIIQ is a short, patient—com—
`pleted, condition-specific, validated
`quality-of-life and symptom-impact
`short-form questionnaire?" Symptom-
`impact and quality—of—life measures are
`divided and can be presented either as
`domain scores, total scores, or individ-
`ual scores across the questionnaire.
`The questionnaire has been shown to
`be sensitive and responsive to clinical
`changes in lower urinary tract symp-
`toms. Although the KIIQ was initially
`designed and validated for use among
`women, recent studies also have also
`proved it to be a valid and reliable
`instrument for evaluating quality of life
`
`in men with urinary incontinence.
`There is good correlation between the
`KIIQ and generic questionnaires,
`including the SF-36. There are 8 vali-
`dated cultural adaptations of the ques-
`tionnaire available in 26 languages,
`including German, Spanish, Swedish,
`Greek, Italian, and Japanese.
`The KIIQ was originally tested in
`293 women who were referred for
`
`evaluation of urinary incontinence?"
`The results of this analysis show that
`symptoms are significantly more
`bothersome in patients with OAB
`than in patients with stress inconti-
`nence. This may be the result, in part,
`of the greater predictability of leakage
`because of stress incontinence than
`
`urge incontinence, making adaptive
`measures more successful in women
`with stress incontinence. When com-
`
`bined-domain scores were evaluated,
`women with OAB also had significant-
`ly greater quality-of-life impairment
`compared with women with normal
`urodynamic function or women with
`stress incontinence (Figure .3).
`The KIIQ has also been used to
`assess responses to clinical changes in
`a recent naturalistic study comparing
`the effects of 10 weeks of tolterodine
`
`or oxybutynin therapy on OAB symp-
`toms in 378 patients (67% women)
`older than 50 years of age.“ A total of
`294 patients completed both generic
`instruments (SF-36 and the Euro-
`QoL) and the KIIQ until
`study
`completion. In a subset analysis per-
`formed by (l..l. Kelleher, mean scores
`for the KIIQ, corrected for comorbidi-
`ty, were
`significantly higher
`in
`younger women than in older women,
`with the higher scores indicating
`greater impairment. The less signifi-
`cant effect on quality of life in older
`women may be a result of adaptive
`changes they have made over time, or
`possibly it is because younger women
`have a more active lifestyle and thus
`perceive symptoms as more bother-
`some. Women who received either
`
`tolterodine or oxybutynin therapy
`during the study showed significant
`
`VOL. 6, NO. 11, SUI’.
`
`THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE
`
`S587
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2063 - 0008
`
`

`
`SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS
`
`improvements from baseline in all
`domains other than health percep-
`tions and interpersonal relationships.“
`Ilowever, effects on interpersonal
`relationships are difficult to evaluate
`with the KIIQ for 2 reasons: the num-
`ber of questions is limited, and ques-
`tions
`regarding
`interpersonal
`relationships exclude patients who
`are not having interpersonal relation-
`ships at study initiation. There was no
`significant difference in mean scores
`obtained from the SF-36 or the Euro-
`
`QOL questionnaire during the 10-
`week course of treatment; however,
`when it was measured with the KIIQ,
`quality of life improved significantly.
`
`Directions for Future Study
`Overactive bladder can result
`
`in
`
`social seclusion and psychological
`stress and limit the day-to-day activi-
`
`ties of those who suffer from it. There
`
`are currently many different types of
`questionnaires
`that
`healthcare
`providers can use to further their
`understanding of the impact of OAB
`on their patients’ day-to-day lives.
`Ilowever, there is a need to develop a
`short, concise questionnaire that can
`he used universally in clinical trials
`and studies. It also may be necessary
`to adapt a validated disease-specific
`questionnaire for use in specific
`patient groups.
`As Roe and colleagues? point out in
`their study, people from ethnic minor-
`ity groups are underrepresented;
`therefore, future research on preva-
`lence estimates of urinary inconti-
`nence should also target ethnic
`minorities, using stratified sampling
`techniques as well as questionnaires
`that contain appropriate language.
`
`Figure 3. Domain Scores of the King's Health Questionnaire by Urodynamic Diagnosis
`
`-0- Women with OAB (n = 80)
`
`-:l- Women with stress incontinence (n = 133)
`-I- Women with normal urodynamics (n = 14)
`
`Domain
`
`Score
`
`Source: Kelleher C], Cardozo LD, Khuller V, Salvatore S. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life in urinary incontinent women. Br]
`Obstet Gynaecoi1997;104:1374-1379. Adapted with permission from C.J. Kelleher and the British journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
`
`5588
`
`THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE
`
`JULY 2000
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2063 - 0009
`
`

`
`In the National Overactive BLadder
`
`concentrated urine that leads to uri-
`
`---QUALITY or LIFE
`
`the
`Evaluation (NOBLE) Program,
`individual burden of OAB in the
`
`United States will be researched by
`estimating the population prevalence
`of OAB and its symptoms (urgency,
`frequency, and urge incontinence),
`assessing the extent
`to which OAB
`interferes with functioning, and deter-
`mining how OAB influences overall
`health. A longitudinal cohort also will
`be identified to measure the natural
`
`history of the disease. These results
`will be used as supportive information
`in future estimates of the economic
`
`burden of ()AB to society.
`In addition, results from the NOBLE
`Program will be used to develop a blad-
`der health questionnaire that can be
`used by primary care physicians to
`screen individuals with bladder health
`
`problems and to validate a computer-
`assisted telephone interview used to
`screen people with OAB symptoms.
`Furthermore,
`the development of a
`simple bladder health questionnaire
`will also provide patients with termi-
`nology for their symptoms and a better
`understanding of their condition, facil-
`itating open communication between
`patient and physician. The goal of the
`program is to allow patients to feel
`comfortable discussing OAB with their
`healthcare provider. An OAB-specific
`quality-of-life instrument is also being
`developed and validated.
`
`Conclusion
`
`Appreciation of the specific impact
`of OAB on the quality of life is critical
`to understanding the need for appro-
`priate health services. Many sufferers
`of OAB seek to manage their symp-
`toms by adjusting to the problem
`instead
`of
`seeking
`treatment.
`Although many elderly people with
`urinary incontinence initially may
`manage their condition with adaptive
`measures, medical attention is need-
`ed before it becomes troublesome; for
`example, severe restriction of fluid
`intake may lead to more serious con-
`sequences, such as dehydration or
`
`nary tract infections.
`It has been shown that approxi-
`mately half of all OAB sufferers would
`welcome some form of
`treatment;
`however, they are reluctant to seek
`help. Of those who discuss their
`symptoms with their primary care
`physicians, 30% do not receive treat-
`ment and 80% are not examined?
`
`Dismissing incontinence and its relat-
`ed symptoms not only has a negative
`impact on the quality of life of those
`who suffer, but it also puts a consider-
`able financial burden on society,
`resulting from a failure to properly
`diagnose and treat OAB.
`
`---REFERENCES---
`
`1. Milsom I. The prevalence of overactive
`bladder. Presented at the 14th Congress of
`the European Association of Gynecology and
`Obstetrics, September 1999, Grenada, Spain.
`2. Wein AJ, Rovner ES. The overactive blad-
`der: An overview for primary care health
`providers. Int} Fern’! 1999:4456-66.
`3. Kobelt-Nguyen G, Johanesson M,
`Mattiasson A, et al. Correlations between
`symptoms of urge incontinence and scores of
`a generic quality of life instrument (SF36)
`and health status measurements (Euro-Qol)
`and between changes in symptoms and QoL
`scores. Presented at the 27th Annual Meeting
`of the International Continence Society,
`September 23-26, 1997, Yokohama, Japan.
`Abstract.
`
`4.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket