throbber
Test on day 10 post-administration compared to
`baseline, and was also found to be undetectable
`in the cerebral spinal fluid of participants [Staskin
`et al., 2010]. In a study of darifenacin among 129
`older adults aged 65-84, no significant effects on
`cognition were observed (memory scanning sensi-
`tivity, speed of reaction time, and word recognition)
`compared with placebo [Lipton et al., 2005]. No data
`on fesoterodine and memory were found.
`
`New onset delirium also does not appear to be a
`significant concern in patients taking antimuscarinic
`agents. Although several published case reports
`have documented the acute onset of delirium fol-
`
`lowing initiation of tolterodine, in incontinent adults
`with and without dementia [Womack and Heilman,
`2003: Salvatore et al._ 2007; Edwards et al., 2002;
`Williams et al., 2004; Tsao et al., 2003], these defi-
`cits resolved upon discontinuation or dose reduction
`of tolterodine.
`In a randomized controlled study of
`extended-release oxybutynin in nursing-home resi-
`dents with mild to severe dementia, there was no
`incidence of delirium over the duration of the study
`[Lackner et al., 2008]. Furthermore, more recent ev-
`idence puts into question the traditionally held belief
`that new use of anticholinergic agents provokes in-
`cident delirium in hospitalized older patients [Camp-
`bell et al.. 2011: Luukkanen et al., 2011].
`
`increasing evidence suggests that
`Taken together,
`with the exception of oxybutynin, use of the other
`antimuscarinic agents poses little or no cognitive
`risk to otherwise healthy older adults with symptoms
`of overactive bladder. However, two caveats apply.
`First, the integrity of the blood brain barrier may be
`compromised in many older adults with cerebro-
`vascular disease, diabetes, or certain forms of de-
`mentia, with the results of studies in healthy older
`adults not generalizable to frailer individuals [Kay et
`al., 2005]. Second, long—term use of antimuscarinic
`agents over months or years may yield more detri-
`mental cognitive effects than single dose or short-
`term use. A number of large observational studies
`have linked chronic consumption of antimuscarinic
`drugs with an increased risk of cognitive impairment.
`although most studies simultaneously examined the
`cumulative effect of drugs with any antimuscarinic
`properties rather than each drug class alone. [An-
`celin et al., 2006; Campbell et al.. 2009; Fox et al.,
`2011]. The Eugenia study of aging randomly recruit-
`ed 372 adults 60 years and older from Montpellier,
`France, and showed that antimuscarinic drug users
`displayed significantly poorer reaction time, atten-
`tion, immediate and delayed visuospatial memory,
`narrative recall, and verbal fluency than did non drug
`users [Ancelin et al., 2006]. A 2-year longitudinal
`study of 13,000 participants enrolled in the Medical
`Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing
`Study also showed that use of medication with anti-
`muscarinic effects was associated with a 0.33-point
`greater decline in the Folstein Mini Mental Status
`Exam score (95% confidence interval
`(Cl)=0.03-
`
`0.64, P=.03) than not taking antimuscarinics. Two-
`year mortality was also greater for those taking
`(OR=‘l.68; 95% Cl=1.30-2.16; P<.00‘l) anticho|iner-
`gics. Many commonly prescribed medications in the
`elderly possess antimuscarinic properties [Chew et
`al., 2008], so the results may not be specific to blad-
`der antimuscarinics. Other antimuscarinic medica-
`
`tion include, among others, amytriptyline, clozapine,
`olanzepine, paroxetine, furosemide. hydrocodone,
`lansoprazole, levofloxacin, and metformin.
`
`Clinicians who remain wary of prescribing antimus-
`carinic agents for frail older adults with symptoms of
`overactive bladder are suggested to proceed with
`caution in prescribing these medications and fully
`weigh the risk—benefit ratio in light of other therapeu-
`tic options that can be equally effective for urgency
`and mixed incontinence in the elderly. If antimusca-
`rinics are to be prescribed, a short cognitive screen
`(such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment http:/I
`www.mocatest.org) or even a full neuropsychologi-
`cal test battery for those patients who are concerned
`or at risk, before and after initiating therapy might
`reveal whether subtle impairments have been in-
`duced. This is especially pertinent because patients
`are often unaware of their memory deficits [Kay et
`al., 2006]. A proxy informant, such as the patient's
`spouse or a relative, may be able to provide more
`reliable information on possible cognitive changes
`resulting from the drugs.
`
`A frequently asked clinical question is whether anti-
`muscarinic agents used to treat incontinence should
`be contraindicated in patients with dementia already
`taking cholinesterase inhibitors. as the mechanisms
`of these two medications are diametrically opposed.
`A number of small studies have shown that cholines-
`
`terase inhibitors used to improve cognition in Alzheim-
`er's disease precipitate urinary incontinence [Hashi-
`moto et al., 2000]. A Japanese study followed 94
`patients with mild to moderate dementia treated with
`donepezil [Hashimoto et al.. 2000]. Seven patients
`developed urinary incontinence, although the event
`was transient in most patients.
`In Scotland, among
`216 patients with Alzheimer's disease initiating treat-
`ment with a cholinesterase inhibitor,
`incontinence
`was precipitated in 6.6%, and those with existing
`incontinence worsened [Starr, 2007]. Epidemiologic
`studies also show associations between cholines-
`
`terase inhibitors and incontinence [Gill et al.. 2005;
`Roe et al., 2002]. In a large population—based cohort
`study of 44,884 adults with dementia carried out in
`Canada, those who were dispensed cholinesterase
`inhibitors were more likely to subsequently receive
`an antimuscarinic drug for incontinence compared to
`those not receiving cholinesterase inhibitors (hazard
`ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.39-1.72) [Gill
`et al., 2005]. This finding was confirmed by a sepa-
`rate study in the U.S. documenting a two-fold risk of
`taking oxybutynin in dementia patients treated with
`donepezil compared to those not treated with done-
`pezil [Roe et al., 2002]. A Japanese study examined
`
`702
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2062 - 0276
`
`

`
`the addition of a 3-month trial of propiverine 20 mg!
`day to donepezil in twenty-six cognitively impaired
`older adults, and found improved dryness rates with
`no deleterious effect on cognition [Sakakibara et al..
`2009]. A 6-month study also compared the effects of
`trospium, galantamine, or trospium plus galantamine
`in 178 older adults with urge incontinence (n=99), de-
`mentia (n=43) or dementia and incontinence (n=36)
`respectively [lsik et al., 2009]. Treatment with 45-60
`mg/day of trospium chloride and combined use of
`trospium with galantamine 24 mgfday was found to
`have no adverse effect on cognitive or physical func-
`tion scores in this group of patients. A larger obser-
`vational study of 3,563 long-term care residents with
`dementia also failed to document an increased rate
`
`of cognitive decline with combined use of a cholin-
`esterase inhibitor and antimuscarinic therapy (oxy-
`butynin or tolterodine) compared to cholinesterase
`therapy alone [Sink et al., 2008]. However, a 50%
`faster rate of physical function decline was observed
`in higher-functioning participants on dual
`therapy
`compared to cholinesterase inhibitor therapy alone.
`This evidence suggests the competing mechanisms
`of the antimuscarinics and cholinesterase inhibitors
`
`may indeed have clinical consequences in some.
`but not all patients.
`
`3. Cardiac safety. Another serious side effect of anti-
`muscarinic drugs in the elderly is the risk of cardiac
`adverse effects and increased mortality, particularly
`due to increases in heart rate, prolongation of the
`QT interval, and induction of polymorphic ventricu-
`lar tachycardia. These have been previously dis-
`cussed, and it has been noted that studies specific
`to the elderly are lacking [Andersson et al., 2011].
`Only one study prospectively examined the effect of
`anticholinergic drug use in 400 community—dwe|ling
`older people (aged 75-90 years) with stable cardio-
`vascular disease in Helsinki. Finland [Uusvaara et
`al., 2011]. Bladder antimuscarinic agents were not
`examined individually, but were considered in a cu-
`mulative assessment of all drugs with antimuscarinic
`properties being taken by the same individual. The
`unadjusted follow-up mortality was 20.7% and 9.5%
`among users and non-users of antimuscarinic drugs,
`respectively (p =0.010). However, the use of drugs
`with antimuscarinic properties was not a significant
`predictor of mortality in multivariate analysis after ad-
`justment for age, sex and other comorbidites (hazard
`ratio 1.57; 95% Cl 0.78, 3.15).
`
`4.Drugldrug interactions in the elderly. Rates of poly-
`pharmacy (> 5 drugs per patient) are high in the ge-
`riatric population, and cause potential for drug—drug
`interactions that increase toxicity or reduce the ef-
`ficacy of antimuscarinic agents [Chancellor and
`Miguel, 2007]. The relationship between the number
`of drugs and potential drug—drug interactions in the
`elderly is alarming. Consumption of 5 to 7 and 8 to
`10 drugs places older adults at a 4-fold and 8-fold
`increased risk of potentially serious drug—drug inter-
`actions respectively, compared with consumption
`
`of 2 to 4 drugs [Johnell 8: Klarin, 2007]. Drug drug
`interactions frequently involve isoenzymes of the
`hepatic cytochrome CYP450 system [Zakrzewski-
`Jakubiak et al., 2011]. Of the antimuscarinic drugs.
`tolterodine, darifenacin, solifenacin, and oxybutynin
`are extensively metabolized by CYP450 and are at
`greater risk of having altered drug metabolism due
`to hepatic-based drug-drug interactions. Trospium
`is eliminated renally as unchanged drug, suggest-
`ing that it has lower potential for CYP450 drug—drug
`interactions [Sand et al., 2011]. Trospium may there-
`fore represent a safer treatment option in the context
`of polypharmacy in the elderly.
`
`ll. DESMOPRESSIN -- EFFICACY AND
`SAFETY IN THE ELDERLY
`
`Desmopressin (DDAVP) (01-02 mg) reduces noc-
`turia in older persons [Rezakhaniha et al., 2011;Fu
`et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 2006], but has been as-
`sociated with significant dose-related hyponatremia
`in 2-20% of older patients [Fu et al., 2011;Johnson
`et al., 2006; Weatherall 2004]. Both female sex and
`increasing age are risk factors for the development
`of hyponatremia [Callreus et al., 2005; Rembratt et
`al., 2006; Juul et al., 2010]. A lower starting dose
`(0.025 mg) for the melt form has been suggested for
`older women [Juul et al., 2010] but requires further
`study. Caution is recommended for the initiation of
`desmopressin in adults aged 65 years and older at
`the current time.
`
`III. BOTULINUM TOXIN A IN OLDER
`ADULTS
`
`To date no studies have stratified the results of tri-
`
`als using BoNTA for the treatment of urinary inconti-
`nence in patients with neurogenic bladder according
`to age. The risk of catheterization due to high post-
`void residual urine volumes following treatment with
`botulinum toxin may be higher in older adults, as
`they are at higher risk of elevated residuals, but this
`requires systematic investigation.
`
`IV. OTHER
`
`None of the other drug classes have undergone
`rigorous evaluation in the elderly, however a num-
`ber of general guidelines apply. Use of o1-AR ago-
`nists and tricyclic antidepressants are discouraged
`in the elderly due to blood pressure considerations.
`Uncontrolled systolic hypertension could occur
`with the former agents and orthostatic hypotension
`leading to falls with the latter. There is no evidence
`that hormonal agents are of benefit for urgency or
`stress incontinence in older women, although local
`estrogens may be indicated to treat symptomatic
`vaginal atrophy. Finally, removal of any offending
`agents that could be contributing to incontinence
`should be considered.
`
`703
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2062 - 0277
`
`

`
`REFERENCES
`
`Abrams P. Amarenco G. BakkeA et al. Tamsulosin: efficacy and
`safety in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunc-
`tion due to suprasacral spinal cord injury. J Urol. 2003;170(4
`Pt 1):1242
`Abrams P. Andersscn KE. Muscarinic receptor antagonists for
`overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2007 Nov;100(5):987
`Abrams P. Andersscn K-E. Buccafusco JJ, et al. Muscarinic
`receptors: their distribution and function in body systems, and
`the implications for treating overactive bladder. BrJ Pharmacol
`2006;148:565
`
`Abrams P. Cardozo L. Chapple C et al. Comparison of the ef-
`ficacy. safety, and tolerability of propiverine and oxybutynin for
`the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Int J Urol. 2006
`Jun:13(6):692
`Abrams P. Cardozo L. Fail M. et al. The standardisation of ter-
`minology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Stand-
`ardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Soci-
`ety. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):16?
`
`Abrams P, Kaplan S. De Koning Gans HJ. Millard R. Safety and
`tolerability of tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder
`in men with bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3
`Pt 1):999-1004:
`Abrams P, Kelleher C, Huels J et al. Clinical relevance of
`health-related quality of life outcomes with darifenacin. BJU
`Int. 2008 Ju|:‘l02(2):208
`the treat-
`Abrams P. Swift 8. Solifenacin is effective for
`ment ot OAB dry patients: a pooled analysis. Eur Urol. 2005
`Sep;48(3):483
`Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research. Urinary Inconti-
`nence Guideline Panel. Urinary Incontinence in Adults: Clinical
`Practice Guideline (AHCPR publication #92-0038). Rockville.
`MD. US Dept. of Health and Human Services. 1992.
`
`Ahmad I. Krishna N5. Small DR. et al. Aetiology and manage-
`ment of acute female urinary retention Br J Med Surg Urol
`2009:2:27-33
`
`Akbar M. Abel R. Seyler TM et at. Repeated botulinum-A toxin
`injections in the treatment of myelodysplastic children and pa-
`tients with spinal cord injuries with neurogenic bladder dysfu nc-
`tion. BJU Int. 2007 Sep;100(3):639
`Al-Badr A. Ross 3. Soroka D et al. What is the available evi-
`dence for honnone reptacement therapy in women with stress
`urinary incontinence? J Obslet Gynecoi Can, 2003;25(7):567
`
`Alhasso A. Glazener CMA. Pickard R et al. Adrenergic drugs
`for urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst
`Rev. 2003:(2):CD001842
`Alhasso A. Glazener CMA. Pickard R, N’Dow J: Adrenergic
`drugs for urinary incontinence in adults (Review). Cochrane
`Database for Systematic Reviews 2005.
`Issue 3. Art. No.
`CDO01842. DOI: 10.1022f14651858. CD001B42. pub 2. Re-
`printed in The Cochrane Library 2008. issue 2.
`Allousi S. Laval K-U. Ecl-cert R. Trospium chloride (spasmolytj
`in patients with motor urge syndrome (detrusor instability):
`a double-blind,
`randomised. nulticentra. placebo-controlled
`study. J Clin Res 1998;1:439
`Alloussi SH. Mtirtz G, Lang C. et al. Desmopressin treatment
`regimens in monosymplomatic and nonrnonosymptomatic enu-
`resis: A review from a clinicat perspective. J Pediatr Urol. 2011
`Feb:7(1):10-20.
`Alloussi SH. Mi.'Irt.z G. Gitzhofer S. et al. Failure of monothera-
`py in primary monosymptomatic enuresis: a combined desmo-
`pressin and propiverine treatment regimen improves efficacy
`outcomes. BJU Int. 2009 .Jun;103(‘l2):1706-12.
`
`Altaweel W. Jednack R. Bilodeau C et al. Repeated intradetru-
`sor botulinum toxin type A in children with neurogenic bladder
`due to myetomeningocele. J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):1102
`Altaweel W. Mokhtar A. Rabah DM. Prospective randomized
`trial of 100u vs 200u botox in the treatment of idiopathic over-
`active bladder. Urcl Ann. 2011 May;3(2):66—70.
`
`Amarenco G. Marquis P. McCarthy C et al. Clualite de vie des
`femmes souffrant d'mpériosité mictionetle avec ou sans fuites:
`etude prospective apres traitement par oxybutinine (1701 cas).
`Presse Medicale, 1998;27:5
`
`Amend B, Hennenlotter J, Schafer T, et al. Effective treatment
`of neurogenic detrusor dysfunction by combined high-dosed
`antimuscarinics without increased side-effects. Eur Urot. 2008
`May;53(5):1021-8.
`Ancelin ML. Artero S, F-‘ortet F et al. Non-degenerative mild
`cognitive impairment in elderly people and use of anticho!iner-
`gic drugs: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ 2006;332:455
`Anders RJ. Wang E. Radhakrishnan J et al. Overflow urinary
`incontinence due to carbamazepine. J Urot 1985: 134: 758
`
`Anderson RU. Mobley D. Blank B. et al. Once-daily controlled
`versus immediate-release oxybutynin chloride for urge uri-
`nary incontinence. OROS Oxybutynin Study Group. J Urol
`1999;161:1809
`
`Andersscn K-E: Current concepts in the treatment of disorders
`of micturition. Drugs 1988;135:477
`
`Andersscn. K.-E. Pharmacology of lower urinary tract smooth
`muscles and penile erectile tissues. Pharmacol Rev, 45:253.
`1993.
`
`Andersscn K-E. Pathways for relaxation of detrusor smooth
`muscle.
`In: Advances in Bladder Research. ed by Baskin LS
`and Hayward SW. Kluwer Academic!P|enurrt Publishers. New
`York 1999. p 241
`Andersscn KE. Bladder activation: afferent mechanisms. Urol-
`ogy. 2002 May:59(5 Suppl 1):43
`
`Andersscn K-E. Potential benefits of muscarinic M3 receptor
`selectivity. Eur Urol Suppl. 2002:1(4):23
`Andersscn K-E. Alpha-adrenoceptors and benign prostatic hy-
`perptasia: basic principles for treatment with a|pha-adrenocep-
`tor antagonists. World J Urol 2002:19{6):390
`Andersscn KE. Antimuscarinics for treatment of overactive
`bladder. Lancet Neurol. 2004 Jan;3(1):46 .
`
`Andersscn KE. Treatment-resistant detrusor overactivity--un-
`derlying pharmacology and potential mechanisms.
`Int J Clin
`Pract Suppl. 2006 Dec'.(151):8-‘l6.
`Andersscn KE. LUTS treatment: future treatment options. Neu-
`rourol Urodyn. 2007 Oct;26(6 Supp|):934-47.
`
`Andersscn KE. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the uri-
`nary tract. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2011a;(202):319-44.
`Andersscn KE. Antimuscarinic mechanisms and the overactive
`detrusor: an update. Eur Urol. 2011b Mar;59(3):377-86
`Andersscn KE. Drugs and future candidates. Can Urol Assoc
`J. 2011c Oct:5(5 Suppl 2):S131-3.
`Andersscn KE. Appell R. Cardozo LD et al. The pharma-
`cological
`treatment of urinary incontinence. BJU Int 1999
`oec:a4(9);923
`
`Andersscn KE. Arner A. Urinary bladder contraction and re-
`laxation: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2004
`Jul;84(3):935-86.
`
`Andersscn K-E. Chapple CR. Cardozo L et al. Pharmacological
`treatment of urinary incontinence. in Abrams P. Khoury S. Wein
`A(Eds). Incontinence. 4rd International Consuftation on Incon-
`tinence. Flymouth. Plymbridge Distributors Ltd. UK. Plymouth.
`p 633. 2009
`Andersscn KE. Campeau L, Olshansky B. Cardiac effects of
`muscarinic receptor antagonists used for voiding dysfunction.
`Br J Clin Pharm 2011 :72:1B6-196.
`
`Andersscn K-E. Chapple CR. Oxybutynin and the overactive
`bladder. World J Urol 2001;19(5):319
`Andersson KE. de Groat WC. McVary KT. et al. Tadalafil for the
`treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign
`prostatic hyperplasiaz pathophysiology and mechanism(s) of
`action. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Mar:30(3):292-301
`Andersscn K-E. Fullhase C. Soler R. Urothelial effects of
`oral antimuscarinic agents. Current Urology Reports 2008b
`Nov;9(5):459
`
`704
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2062 - 0278
`
`

`
`Andersson KE. Gralzke C. Phannacology of alpha1-adreno-
`ceptor antagonists in the lower urinary tract and central nervous
`system. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007 JuI;4('r'):36B-78.
`Andersson KE. Gratzke C. Hedlund P. The role of the transient
`receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of cation—selective chan-
`nets in the management of the overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2010
`Ocl;105(B):1114—27.
`
`Andersson K-E. Michel MC. Urinary Tract. Handbook of Expen-
`mental Pharmacology. Springer-Verlag. Benin Heidelberg 2011
`Andersson KE. Pehrson R. CNS involvement in overactive blad-
`der: pathophysiology and opportunities for pharmacological in-
`tervention. Dmgs. 2003;63(23):2595
`
`Andersson KE. Olshansky B. Treating patients with overactive
`bladder syndrome with antimuscarinics: heart rate considera-
`tions. BJU Intemational 2007;100:1007
`
`Andersson K-E. Persson K. The L—arginineInitn‘c oxide pathway
`and non-adrenergic. non-cholinergic relaxation of the lower uri-
`nary tract. 1993;Gen Pharmacol 24:833
`
`Andersson K-E. Uckert S. Stief C et al. Phosphodiesterases
`(PDEs) and PDE inhibitors for treatment of LUTS. Neurourol
`Urodyn 1997 Oct;26(6Suppl):92B
`
`Andersson K-E. Wein AJ. Pharmacology of the lower urinary
`tract - basis for current and future treatments of urinary inconti-
`nence. Pharmacol Rev 2004 Dec: 56(4):5B1
`Andersson KE. Sarawate C. Kahler KH. et al. Cardiovascular
`morbidity, heart rates and use of antimuscarinics in patients with
`overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2010 JuI;106(2):268-74.
`Andereson K. Wein A. Pharrnaoologic management of lower
`urinary tract storage and emptying failure.
`In Campbel|—Wa|sh
`Urology (Wain A. Kavoussi L. Novick A. Partin A. Peters C. eds).
`Elsevier Saunders. Philadelphia. 2012. pp196?-2002
`Andersson MC, Tobin G. Giglio D. Cholinergic nitric oxide re-
`lease from the urinary bladder mucosa in cyc|ophosphamide-
`induced cystitis of the anaesthetized rat. Br J Phannacol
`2008a:153:1438.
`
`Andrews MD. Fish P v. Blagg J. at al. Pyrimido [4.5-d] azepines
`as potent and selective 5-HT2 receptor agonists:design. syn-
`thesis and evaluation of PF-3236799 as a treatment for urinary
`incontinence. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2011;21(9):2T15-2720
`
`Aoki KR. Review of a proposed mechanism for the antinocic-
`eptive action of botulinum toxin type A. Neurotoxicology. 2005
`Oct;26(5):785
`
`Aoki K. Hirayama A. Tanaka N, et al. Ahigher level of prostaglan-
`din E2 in the urinary bladder in young boys and boys with lower
`urinary tract obstruction. Biomed Res. 2009 Dec;30(6):343-7.
`Apostolidis A. Brady CM, Yiangou Y. et al. Capsaicin receptor
`TRPV1 in urolhelium of neurogenic human bladders and effect
`of intravesical resiniferatoxin. Urology. 2005 Feb;65(2):400-5.
`
`Apostolidis A. Gonzales GE. Fowler CJ. Effect of intravesi-
`cal Resiniferatoxin (RTX) on lower urinary tract symptoms,
`urodynamic parameters. and quality of life of patients with
`urodynamic increased bladder sensation. Eur Urol. 2006
`Dec;50(6):1299
`
`Apostolidis A. Jacques TS. Freeman A, et al. Histological
`changes in the urothelium and suburothelium of human over-
`active bladder following intradetrusor injections of botulinum
`neurotoxin type A for the treatment of neurogenic or idiopathic
`detrusor overactivity. Eur Urol. 2008 Jun:53(6):1245-53
`Apostolidis A. Kirana PS. Chiu G. et al. Gender and ge dif-
`ferences in the perception of bother and health care seeking
`for lower urinary tract symptoms: results from the hospitalised
`and outpatients‘ profile and expectations study. Eur Urol. 2009
`Dec;5B(6):937-47.
`
`Apostolidis A. Popat R. Yiangou Y et al. Decreased sensory re-
`ceptors P2X3 and TRPV1 in suburothelial nerve fibers following
`intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin for human detrusor
`overactivity. J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):9Tf
`Appell RA. Chancellor MB. Zobrist RH et al. Pharmacokinetics,
`metabolism. nd saliva output during transdennl and extended-
`release oral oxybutynin administration in healthy subjects. Mayo
`Clin Proc. 2003;78(6):696. 2003.
`
`Appell RA. Sand P. Dmochowski R et al. Overactive bladder".
`judging elfective control and treatment study group. Prospec-
`tive randomized controlled trial of extended-release oxybutynin
`chloride and tolterodine tartrate in the treatment of overac-
`tive bladder: results of the OBJECT Study. Mayo Clin Proc.
`2001;76{4):35B
`Araki
`I. TRP channels in urinary bladder mechanosensation
`Adv Exp Med Biol. 2011 ;704:861-79.
`
`Araki I, Du S, Kobayashi H. et al. Roles of mechanosensitive
`ion channels in bladder sensory
`transduction
`and
`overac-
`tive bladder. Int J Urol. 2008 Aug;15(8):681-7.
`
`Arisco AM. Brantly EK, Kraus SR. Oxybutynin extended release
`for the management of overactive bladder: a clinical review.
`Drug Des Devel Ther. 2009 Sep 21;3:151-61.
`
`Aschkenazi S. Botms S, Miller J et al. Overactive bladder symp-
`toms are not related to detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn.
`2007;26(5). abstract 35
`
`Asplund R. Sundberg B. Bengtsson P. Oral desmopressin for
`nocturnal polyuria in elderly subjects: a double-blind. placebo-
`controlled randomized exploratory study. BJU Int 1999;83:591
`Athanasopoulos A. Cruz F. The medical treatment of overactive
`bladder.
`including current and future treatments. Expert Opin
`Pharmacother. 2011 May; 12(T):1 041 -55
`
`Athanasopoulos A. Gyftopoulos K. Giannitsas K at al. G. Combi-
`nation treatment with an alpha-blocker plus an anticholinergic for
`bladder outlet obstruction: a prospective. randomized. controlled
`study. J Urol 2003; 16922253
`
`t-lussain I. et al. Brain responses to
`Athwal BS, Berkley KJ,
`changes in bladder volume and urge to void in healthy men.
`Brain. 2001 ;124(Pt 2):369
`Austin PF, Ferguson (3. Yan Y. et al. Combination therapy with
`desmopressin and an nticholinergic medication for nonre-
`spcnders to desmopressin for monosymptomatic nocturnal
`enuresis: a randomized. double-blind. placebo-controlled trial.
`Pediatrics. 2008 Nov;122(5):1027-32.
`AvelinoA., Charrua A, Frias B, Cruz co. Boudes M, de Rid-
`der D.. Cruz F. TRP channels in bladder function. 2012. Acta
`Physiol Scand (in press)
`
`Avelino A, Cruz F. TRPV1 (vanilloid receptor) in the urinary
`tract: expression. function and clinical applications. Naunyn
`Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacot. 2006 Ju|;373(4):2B7-99.
`
`Badawi JK, Seja T, Uecelehan H et al. Relaxation of human de-
`trusor muscle by selective beta-2 and beta-3 agonists and en-
`dogenous catecholamines. Urology. 2007 Apr;69(4):7B5
`
`Baa JH. Oh MM. Shim KS el al. The effects of long-term ad-
`ministration of oral desmopressin on the baseline secretion of
`antidiuretic hormone and serum sodium concentration for the
`treatment of nocturia: a circadian study. J. Urol 2007;‘l7B(1):200
`Baigrie RJ, Kalleher JP. Fawcett DP at al. Oxybutynin: is it safe?
`Br J Urol. 1988;62:319 Jonville AP. Dutertre JP. Autret E at al.
`Effets indesirahles du chlorure d'oxybutynine (Ditropan®). Ther-
`apie 1992;4';':389
`
`Baldessarini KJ. Drugs in the treatment of psychiatric disorders.
`In: Gilman at al. (Eds) The phannacological basis of therapeu-
`tics. 7th ed.. McMillan Publishing Co.. p387. 1985
`Baldo A. Berger TH. Kofler M et al.: The influence of intrathecal
`baclofen on detrusor function. A urodynamic study. Neurourol
`Urodyn. 2000. 19. 444 (abstract 53).
`Banakhar MA. Al-Shaiji TF. Hassouna MM. Pathophysiology of
`gyeractive bladder. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Feb 7. [Epub ahead
`print]
`Barendrecht MM. Oelke M. Laguna MP et al. Is the use of para-
`sympathomimetics for treating an underactive urinary bladder
`evidence-based? BJU Int 2007:99:749
`
`Basra RK . Wagg A. Chapple C et al . A review of adherence to
`drug therapy inpatients with overactive bladder . BJU Int 2008 ;
`102 : 774 — 9
`
`Bayliss M, Wu C, Newgreen D et al. A quantitative study of atro-
`pine-resistant contractile responses in human detrusor smooth
`muscle. from stable. unstable and obstructed bladders. J Urol
`1999;162:1833
`
`705
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2062 - 0279
`
`

`
`Bechara A. Romano S. Casabe A et al. Comparative eft'i-
`cacy assessment of tamsutosin vs. tamsulosin plus tarta-
`lafil in the treatment of LUTSIBPH. Pilot study. J Sex Med
`2003;5:2170-2178.
`
`Beckel JM. Holstege G. Neuroanatomy of the lower urinary
`tract. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2011;(202):99-116.
`Beckmann-Knopp S. Rietbroclv: S. Weyhenmeyer R et al. Inhib-
`itory effects of trospium chloride on cytochrome P450 enzymes
`in human liver microsomes. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1999;(6):299
`
`Beermann B, Hellstrom K. Rosen A. On the metabolism of pro-
`pantheline in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1972: 13(2):212
`
`Behr-Roussel D. Oger S. Caisey S. et al. Vardenafil decreases
`bladder afferent nerve activity in unanesthetized. decerebrate.
`spinal cord-injured rats. Eur Urol 2010;59: 272-279.
`Bent A. Gousse A. Hendrix S. Duloxetine compared with pla-
`cebo for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence.
`Neurourol Urodyn 2008:27(3):212-221
`Bent S. 1'iedt TN. Odden MC. et al. The relative safety of ephe-
`dra compared with other herbal products. Ann Intern Med.
`2003;138(6):4BB
`Berridge MJ. Smooth muscle cell calcium activation mecha-
`nisms. J Physiol. 2008 Nov 1;586(Pt 21 ):5047-61
`Bharucha AE. Seide B. Guan 2 et al. Effect of tolterodine on
`gastrointestinal transit and bowel habits in healthy subjects.
`Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008 Jun:20(6):643
`
`Biers SM. Reynard JM. Brading AF. The effects of a new se-
`lective beta3—adrenoceptor agonist {GW427353) on spontane-
`ous activity and detrusor relaxation in human bladder. BJU Int.
`2006 Dec;98(6):1310
`
`Bigger JT. Giardina EG, Perel JM et al. Cardiac antiarrhythmic
`effect of imipramine hydrochloride. N Enl J Med 1977;296:206
`Birder LA. de Groat WC. Mechanisms of disease: involvement
`of the urothelium in bladder dysfunction. Nat Clin Pract Urol.
`2007 Jan:4(1):46-54.
`Birder LA, Kanai AJ, de Groat WC, at al. Vanilloid receptor ex-
`pression suggests a sensory role for urinary bladder epithelial
`cells. Proc Natl Aced Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 6;98(23):13396-401.
`Birder LA, Nakamura Y. Kiss 8, et al. Altered urinary bladder
`function in mice lacking the vanilloid receptor TRPV1. Net Neu-
`rosci. 2002 Sep;5(9):85B-60.
`Blaivas JG, Lebib KB, Michalik J et al. Cystometric response
`to propentheline in detrusor hyperreflexia: therapeutic implica-
`tions. J Urol. 1980;124:259
`
`Blok BF. Sturms LM, Hoistege G. Brain activation during mictu-
`rltion in women. Brain. 1998:121 ( Pt 11):2033
`Blue DR. Daniels DV. Gever JR et al. Pharmacological charac-
`teristics of Re 115-1240. a selective? 1A-1L- adrenoceptor par-
`tial agonist: a potential therapy for stress urinary incontinence.
`BJU Int 2004;93(1):162
`
`Blyweert W. Van Der Aa F. De Ridder D. Cannabinoid therapy
`in detrusor overactivity: local versus systemic effect in a spinal-
`ised rat model. Neurourol Urodyn 2003;22:379-530.
`Bodeker RH. Madersbacher H. Neumeister C. Zetlner M. Dose
`escalation improves therapeutic outcome: post hoc analysis of
`data from a 12-week. multicentre. double-blind. parallel-group
`trial of trospium chloride in patients with urinary urge inconti-
`nence. BMC Urol. 2010 Sep 14;10:15.
`Bolduc S. Moore K. Nadeau G. et al. Prospective open label
`study of solifenacin for overactive bladder in chitdren. J Urol.
`2010 Dct;1B4(4 Suppl):16B8-73.
`Bosch RJLH. Griffiths DJ. Blom JHM et al. Treatment of be-
`nign prostatic hyperplasia by androgen deprivation: effects on
`prostate size and urodynamic parameters. J Urol 1989:1141 :68
`Bosch JL Weiss JP. The Prevalence and Causes of Nocturia. J
`Urol 2010;13-1(2): 440-446.
`
`Boy 8. Self C, Braun PM et al. Retrospective Analysis of treat-
`ment outcomes and medical care of patients with neurogenic
`detrusor overactivity (NDO) receiving BOTOX therapy. Euro-
`pean Urology Suppiements. 2008:? (31212
`
`Brady CM. Apostolidis AN, Harper M at al. Parallel changes in
`bladder suburothelial vanilloid receptor TRPV1 and pan-neu-
`ronal marker PGP9.5 immunoreactivity in patients with neuro-
`genic detrusor overactivity after intravesical resiniferatoxin treat-
`ment. BJU Int. 2004 Apr;93(8):770
`Brady CM. DasGupta R. Dalton C. et al. An open-label pilot
`study of cannabis-based extracts for bladder dysfunction in ad-
`vanced multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2004;10:425-433.
`
`Braverman AS, Doumanian LR, Ruggieri MR. Sr. M2 and M3
`muscarinic receptor activation of urinary bladder contractile sig-
`nal transduction.
`ll. Denervated rat bladder. J Phannacol Exp
`Ther 2006;316:375
`
`Braverman AS. Karlovsky M. Pontari MA et al. Aging and hyper-
`trophy change the muscarinic receptor subtype mediating blad-
`der contraction from M3 towards M2. J Urol 2002;16'! Suppl.:
`Abstract #170.
`
`Bravennan AS, Kohn IJ. Luthin GR et al. Prejunctional M1 facili-
`tatory and M2 inhibitory muscarinic receptors mediate rat blad-
`der contractility. Am J Physiol 1998274: R51?
`Bravennan AS, Luthin GR. Ruggieri MR. M2 muscarinic receptor
`contributes to contraction of the denervated rat urinary bladder.
`Am J Physiol 1993:2'r'5:R1654
`
`Braverman AS. Ruggieri MR, Sr. Hypertrophy changes the mus-
`carinic receptor subtype mediating bladder contraction from M3
`toward M2. Am J Physiol 2003;285:R701
`
`Brennan PE, Whitlock GA. Ho DK, et at. piscovery of a novel
`azepine series of potent and selective 5-HTZQ agonists as po-
`tential treatments for urinary incontinence. Broorg Med Chem
`Lett 2009:1931-999-5003
`
`Bridgewater M. Brading AF. Evidence for a non-nitrergic inhibito-
`ry innervation in the pig urethra. Neurourol Urodyn 1993:1235‘!
`
`Briggs KS. Castleden CM, Asher MJ. The effect of flevoxate on
`uninhibited detrusor contractions and urinary incontinence in the
`elderly. J Urol 1980;123:665
`
`Brubaker L. FitzGera|d MP. Nocturnal polyuria and nocturia relief
`in patients treated with solifenacin for overactive bladder symp-
`toms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket