`baseline, and was also found to be undetectable
`in the cerebral spinal fluid of participants [Staskin
`et al., 2010]. In a study of darifenacin among 129
`older adults aged 65-84, no significant effects on
`cognition were observed (memory scanning sensi-
`tivity, speed of reaction time, and word recognition)
`compared with placebo [Lipton et al., 2005]. No data
`on fesoterodine and memory were found.
`
`New onset delirium also does not appear to be a
`significant concern in patients taking antimuscarinic
`agents. Although several published case reports
`have documented the acute onset of delirium fol-
`
`lowing initiation of tolterodine, in incontinent adults
`with and without dementia [Womack and Heilman,
`2003: Salvatore et al._ 2007; Edwards et al., 2002;
`Williams et al., 2004; Tsao et al., 2003], these defi-
`cits resolved upon discontinuation or dose reduction
`of tolterodine.
`In a randomized controlled study of
`extended-release oxybutynin in nursing-home resi-
`dents with mild to severe dementia, there was no
`incidence of delirium over the duration of the study
`[Lackner et al., 2008]. Furthermore, more recent ev-
`idence puts into question the traditionally held belief
`that new use of anticholinergic agents provokes in-
`cident delirium in hospitalized older patients [Camp-
`bell et al.. 2011: Luukkanen et al., 2011].
`
`increasing evidence suggests that
`Taken together,
`with the exception of oxybutynin, use of the other
`antimuscarinic agents poses little or no cognitive
`risk to otherwise healthy older adults with symptoms
`of overactive bladder. However, two caveats apply.
`First, the integrity of the blood brain barrier may be
`compromised in many older adults with cerebro-
`vascular disease, diabetes, or certain forms of de-
`mentia, with the results of studies in healthy older
`adults not generalizable to frailer individuals [Kay et
`al., 2005]. Second, long—term use of antimuscarinic
`agents over months or years may yield more detri-
`mental cognitive effects than single dose or short-
`term use. A number of large observational studies
`have linked chronic consumption of antimuscarinic
`drugs with an increased risk of cognitive impairment.
`although most studies simultaneously examined the
`cumulative effect of drugs with any antimuscarinic
`properties rather than each drug class alone. [An-
`celin et al., 2006; Campbell et al.. 2009; Fox et al.,
`2011]. The Eugenia study of aging randomly recruit-
`ed 372 adults 60 years and older from Montpellier,
`France, and showed that antimuscarinic drug users
`displayed significantly poorer reaction time, atten-
`tion, immediate and delayed visuospatial memory,
`narrative recall, and verbal fluency than did non drug
`users [Ancelin et al., 2006]. A 2-year longitudinal
`study of 13,000 participants enrolled in the Medical
`Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing
`Study also showed that use of medication with anti-
`muscarinic effects was associated with a 0.33-point
`greater decline in the Folstein Mini Mental Status
`Exam score (95% confidence interval
`(Cl)=0.03-
`
`0.64, P=.03) than not taking antimuscarinics. Two-
`year mortality was also greater for those taking
`(OR=‘l.68; 95% Cl=1.30-2.16; P<.00‘l) anticho|iner-
`gics. Many commonly prescribed medications in the
`elderly possess antimuscarinic properties [Chew et
`al., 2008], so the results may not be specific to blad-
`der antimuscarinics. Other antimuscarinic medica-
`
`tion include, among others, amytriptyline, clozapine,
`olanzepine, paroxetine, furosemide. hydrocodone,
`lansoprazole, levofloxacin, and metformin.
`
`Clinicians who remain wary of prescribing antimus-
`carinic agents for frail older adults with symptoms of
`overactive bladder are suggested to proceed with
`caution in prescribing these medications and fully
`weigh the risk—benefit ratio in light of other therapeu-
`tic options that can be equally effective for urgency
`and mixed incontinence in the elderly. If antimusca-
`rinics are to be prescribed, a short cognitive screen
`(such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment http:/I
`www.mocatest.org) or even a full neuropsychologi-
`cal test battery for those patients who are concerned
`or at risk, before and after initiating therapy might
`reveal whether subtle impairments have been in-
`duced. This is especially pertinent because patients
`are often unaware of their memory deficits [Kay et
`al., 2006]. A proxy informant, such as the patient's
`spouse or a relative, may be able to provide more
`reliable information on possible cognitive changes
`resulting from the drugs.
`
`A frequently asked clinical question is whether anti-
`muscarinic agents used to treat incontinence should
`be contraindicated in patients with dementia already
`taking cholinesterase inhibitors. as the mechanisms
`of these two medications are diametrically opposed.
`A number of small studies have shown that cholines-
`
`terase inhibitors used to improve cognition in Alzheim-
`er's disease precipitate urinary incontinence [Hashi-
`moto et al., 2000]. A Japanese study followed 94
`patients with mild to moderate dementia treated with
`donepezil [Hashimoto et al.. 2000]. Seven patients
`developed urinary incontinence, although the event
`was transient in most patients.
`In Scotland, among
`216 patients with Alzheimer's disease initiating treat-
`ment with a cholinesterase inhibitor,
`incontinence
`was precipitated in 6.6%, and those with existing
`incontinence worsened [Starr, 2007]. Epidemiologic
`studies also show associations between cholines-
`
`terase inhibitors and incontinence [Gill et al.. 2005;
`Roe et al., 2002]. In a large population—based cohort
`study of 44,884 adults with dementia carried out in
`Canada, those who were dispensed cholinesterase
`inhibitors were more likely to subsequently receive
`an antimuscarinic drug for incontinence compared to
`those not receiving cholinesterase inhibitors (hazard
`ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.39-1.72) [Gill
`et al., 2005]. This finding was confirmed by a sepa-
`rate study in the U.S. documenting a two-fold risk of
`taking oxybutynin in dementia patients treated with
`donepezil compared to those not treated with done-
`pezil [Roe et al., 2002]. A Japanese study examined
`
`702
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2062 - 0276
`
`
`
`the addition of a 3-month trial of propiverine 20 mg!
`day to donepezil in twenty-six cognitively impaired
`older adults, and found improved dryness rates with
`no deleterious effect on cognition [Sakakibara et al..
`2009]. A 6-month study also compared the effects of
`trospium, galantamine, or trospium plus galantamine
`in 178 older adults with urge incontinence (n=99), de-
`mentia (n=43) or dementia and incontinence (n=36)
`respectively [lsik et al., 2009]. Treatment with 45-60
`mg/day of trospium chloride and combined use of
`trospium with galantamine 24 mgfday was found to
`have no adverse effect on cognitive or physical func-
`tion scores in this group of patients. A larger obser-
`vational study of 3,563 long-term care residents with
`dementia also failed to document an increased rate
`
`of cognitive decline with combined use of a cholin-
`esterase inhibitor and antimuscarinic therapy (oxy-
`butynin or tolterodine) compared to cholinesterase
`therapy alone [Sink et al., 2008]. However, a 50%
`faster rate of physical function decline was observed
`in higher-functioning participants on dual
`therapy
`compared to cholinesterase inhibitor therapy alone.
`This evidence suggests the competing mechanisms
`of the antimuscarinics and cholinesterase inhibitors
`
`may indeed have clinical consequences in some.
`but not all patients.
`
`3. Cardiac safety. Another serious side effect of anti-
`muscarinic drugs in the elderly is the risk of cardiac
`adverse effects and increased mortality, particularly
`due to increases in heart rate, prolongation of the
`QT interval, and induction of polymorphic ventricu-
`lar tachycardia. These have been previously dis-
`cussed, and it has been noted that studies specific
`to the elderly are lacking [Andersson et al., 2011].
`Only one study prospectively examined the effect of
`anticholinergic drug use in 400 community—dwe|ling
`older people (aged 75-90 years) with stable cardio-
`vascular disease in Helsinki. Finland [Uusvaara et
`al., 2011]. Bladder antimuscarinic agents were not
`examined individually, but were considered in a cu-
`mulative assessment of all drugs with antimuscarinic
`properties being taken by the same individual. The
`unadjusted follow-up mortality was 20.7% and 9.5%
`among users and non-users of antimuscarinic drugs,
`respectively (p =0.010). However, the use of drugs
`with antimuscarinic properties was not a significant
`predictor of mortality in multivariate analysis after ad-
`justment for age, sex and other comorbidites (hazard
`ratio 1.57; 95% Cl 0.78, 3.15).
`
`4.Drugldrug interactions in the elderly. Rates of poly-
`pharmacy (> 5 drugs per patient) are high in the ge-
`riatric population, and cause potential for drug—drug
`interactions that increase toxicity or reduce the ef-
`ficacy of antimuscarinic agents [Chancellor and
`Miguel, 2007]. The relationship between the number
`of drugs and potential drug—drug interactions in the
`elderly is alarming. Consumption of 5 to 7 and 8 to
`10 drugs places older adults at a 4-fold and 8-fold
`increased risk of potentially serious drug—drug inter-
`actions respectively, compared with consumption
`
`of 2 to 4 drugs [Johnell 8: Klarin, 2007]. Drug drug
`interactions frequently involve isoenzymes of the
`hepatic cytochrome CYP450 system [Zakrzewski-
`Jakubiak et al., 2011]. Of the antimuscarinic drugs.
`tolterodine, darifenacin, solifenacin, and oxybutynin
`are extensively metabolized by CYP450 and are at
`greater risk of having altered drug metabolism due
`to hepatic-based drug-drug interactions. Trospium
`is eliminated renally as unchanged drug, suggest-
`ing that it has lower potential for CYP450 drug—drug
`interactions [Sand et al., 2011]. Trospium may there-
`fore represent a safer treatment option in the context
`of polypharmacy in the elderly.
`
`ll. DESMOPRESSIN -- EFFICACY AND
`SAFETY IN THE ELDERLY
`
`Desmopressin (DDAVP) (01-02 mg) reduces noc-
`turia in older persons [Rezakhaniha et al., 2011;Fu
`et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 2006], but has been as-
`sociated with significant dose-related hyponatremia
`in 2-20% of older patients [Fu et al., 2011;Johnson
`et al., 2006; Weatherall 2004]. Both female sex and
`increasing age are risk factors for the development
`of hyponatremia [Callreus et al., 2005; Rembratt et
`al., 2006; Juul et al., 2010]. A lower starting dose
`(0.025 mg) for the melt form has been suggested for
`older women [Juul et al., 2010] but requires further
`study. Caution is recommended for the initiation of
`desmopressin in adults aged 65 years and older at
`the current time.
`
`III. BOTULINUM TOXIN A IN OLDER
`ADULTS
`
`To date no studies have stratified the results of tri-
`
`als using BoNTA for the treatment of urinary inconti-
`nence in patients with neurogenic bladder according
`to age. The risk of catheterization due to high post-
`void residual urine volumes following treatment with
`botulinum toxin may be higher in older adults, as
`they are at higher risk of elevated residuals, but this
`requires systematic investigation.
`
`IV. OTHER
`
`None of the other drug classes have undergone
`rigorous evaluation in the elderly, however a num-
`ber of general guidelines apply. Use of o1-AR ago-
`nists and tricyclic antidepressants are discouraged
`in the elderly due to blood pressure considerations.
`Uncontrolled systolic hypertension could occur
`with the former agents and orthostatic hypotension
`leading to falls with the latter. There is no evidence
`that hormonal agents are of benefit for urgency or
`stress incontinence in older women, although local
`estrogens may be indicated to treat symptomatic
`vaginal atrophy. Finally, removal of any offending
`agents that could be contributing to incontinence
`should be considered.
`
`703
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2062 - 0277
`
`
`
`REFERENCES
`
`Abrams P. Amarenco G. BakkeA et al. Tamsulosin: efficacy and
`safety in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunc-
`tion due to suprasacral spinal cord injury. J Urol. 2003;170(4
`Pt 1):1242
`Abrams P. Andersscn KE. Muscarinic receptor antagonists for
`overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2007 Nov;100(5):987
`Abrams P. Andersscn K-E. Buccafusco JJ, et al. Muscarinic
`receptors: their distribution and function in body systems, and
`the implications for treating overactive bladder. BrJ Pharmacol
`2006;148:565
`
`Abrams P. Cardozo L. Chapple C et al. Comparison of the ef-
`ficacy. safety, and tolerability of propiverine and oxybutynin for
`the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Int J Urol. 2006
`Jun:13(6):692
`Abrams P. Cardozo L. Fail M. et al. The standardisation of ter-
`minology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Stand-
`ardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Soci-
`ety. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):16?
`
`Abrams P, Kaplan S. De Koning Gans HJ. Millard R. Safety and
`tolerability of tolterodine for the treatment of overactive bladder
`in men with bladder outlet obstruction. J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3
`Pt 1):999-1004:
`Abrams P, Kelleher C, Huels J et al. Clinical relevance of
`health-related quality of life outcomes with darifenacin. BJU
`Int. 2008 Ju|:‘l02(2):208
`the treat-
`Abrams P. Swift 8. Solifenacin is effective for
`ment ot OAB dry patients: a pooled analysis. Eur Urol. 2005
`Sep;48(3):483
`Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research. Urinary Inconti-
`nence Guideline Panel. Urinary Incontinence in Adults: Clinical
`Practice Guideline (AHCPR publication #92-0038). Rockville.
`MD. US Dept. of Health and Human Services. 1992.
`
`Ahmad I. Krishna N5. Small DR. et al. Aetiology and manage-
`ment of acute female urinary retention Br J Med Surg Urol
`2009:2:27-33
`
`Akbar M. Abel R. Seyler TM et at. Repeated botulinum-A toxin
`injections in the treatment of myelodysplastic children and pa-
`tients with spinal cord injuries with neurogenic bladder dysfu nc-
`tion. BJU Int. 2007 Sep;100(3):639
`Al-Badr A. Ross 3. Soroka D et al. What is the available evi-
`dence for honnone reptacement therapy in women with stress
`urinary incontinence? J Obslet Gynecoi Can, 2003;25(7):567
`
`Alhasso A. Glazener CMA. Pickard R et al. Adrenergic drugs
`for urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst
`Rev. 2003:(2):CD001842
`Alhasso A. Glazener CMA. Pickard R, N’Dow J: Adrenergic
`drugs for urinary incontinence in adults (Review). Cochrane
`Database for Systematic Reviews 2005.
`Issue 3. Art. No.
`CDO01842. DOI: 10.1022f14651858. CD001B42. pub 2. Re-
`printed in The Cochrane Library 2008. issue 2.
`Allousi S. Laval K-U. Ecl-cert R. Trospium chloride (spasmolytj
`in patients with motor urge syndrome (detrusor instability):
`a double-blind,
`randomised. nulticentra. placebo-controlled
`study. J Clin Res 1998;1:439
`Alloussi SH. Mtirtz G, Lang C. et al. Desmopressin treatment
`regimens in monosymplomatic and nonrnonosymptomatic enu-
`resis: A review from a clinicat perspective. J Pediatr Urol. 2011
`Feb:7(1):10-20.
`Alloussi SH. Mi.'Irt.z G. Gitzhofer S. et al. Failure of monothera-
`py in primary monosymptomatic enuresis: a combined desmo-
`pressin and propiverine treatment regimen improves efficacy
`outcomes. BJU Int. 2009 .Jun;103(‘l2):1706-12.
`
`Altaweel W. Jednack R. Bilodeau C et al. Repeated intradetru-
`sor botulinum toxin type A in children with neurogenic bladder
`due to myetomeningocele. J Urol. 2006 Mar;175(3 Pt 1):1102
`Altaweel W. Mokhtar A. Rabah DM. Prospective randomized
`trial of 100u vs 200u botox in the treatment of idiopathic over-
`active bladder. Urcl Ann. 2011 May;3(2):66—70.
`
`Amarenco G. Marquis P. McCarthy C et al. Clualite de vie des
`femmes souffrant d'mpériosité mictionetle avec ou sans fuites:
`etude prospective apres traitement par oxybutinine (1701 cas).
`Presse Medicale, 1998;27:5
`
`Amend B, Hennenlotter J, Schafer T, et al. Effective treatment
`of neurogenic detrusor dysfunction by combined high-dosed
`antimuscarinics without increased side-effects. Eur Urot. 2008
`May;53(5):1021-8.
`Ancelin ML. Artero S, F-‘ortet F et al. Non-degenerative mild
`cognitive impairment in elderly people and use of anticho!iner-
`gic drugs: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ 2006;332:455
`Anders RJ. Wang E. Radhakrishnan J et al. Overflow urinary
`incontinence due to carbamazepine. J Urot 1985: 134: 758
`
`Anderson RU. Mobley D. Blank B. et al. Once-daily controlled
`versus immediate-release oxybutynin chloride for urge uri-
`nary incontinence. OROS Oxybutynin Study Group. J Urol
`1999;161:1809
`
`Andersscn K-E: Current concepts in the treatment of disorders
`of micturition. Drugs 1988;135:477
`
`Andersscn. K.-E. Pharmacology of lower urinary tract smooth
`muscles and penile erectile tissues. Pharmacol Rev, 45:253.
`1993.
`
`Andersscn K-E. Pathways for relaxation of detrusor smooth
`muscle.
`In: Advances in Bladder Research. ed by Baskin LS
`and Hayward SW. Kluwer Academic!P|enurrt Publishers. New
`York 1999. p 241
`Andersscn KE. Bladder activation: afferent mechanisms. Urol-
`ogy. 2002 May:59(5 Suppl 1):43
`
`Andersscn K-E. Potential benefits of muscarinic M3 receptor
`selectivity. Eur Urol Suppl. 2002:1(4):23
`Andersscn K-E. Alpha-adrenoceptors and benign prostatic hy-
`perptasia: basic principles for treatment with a|pha-adrenocep-
`tor antagonists. World J Urol 2002:19{6):390
`Andersscn KE. Antimuscarinics for treatment of overactive
`bladder. Lancet Neurol. 2004 Jan;3(1):46 .
`
`Andersscn KE. Treatment-resistant detrusor overactivity--un-
`derlying pharmacology and potential mechanisms.
`Int J Clin
`Pract Suppl. 2006 Dec'.(151):8-‘l6.
`Andersscn KE. LUTS treatment: future treatment options. Neu-
`rourol Urodyn. 2007 Oct;26(6 Supp|):934-47.
`
`Andersscn KE. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the uri-
`nary tract. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2011a;(202):319-44.
`Andersscn KE. Antimuscarinic mechanisms and the overactive
`detrusor: an update. Eur Urol. 2011b Mar;59(3):377-86
`Andersscn KE. Drugs and future candidates. Can Urol Assoc
`J. 2011c Oct:5(5 Suppl 2):S131-3.
`Andersscn KE. Appell R. Cardozo LD et al. The pharma-
`cological
`treatment of urinary incontinence. BJU Int 1999
`oec:a4(9);923
`
`Andersscn KE. Arner A. Urinary bladder contraction and re-
`laxation: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2004
`Jul;84(3):935-86.
`
`Andersscn K-E. Chapple CR. Cardozo L et al. Pharmacological
`treatment of urinary incontinence. in Abrams P. Khoury S. Wein
`A(Eds). Incontinence. 4rd International Consuftation on Incon-
`tinence. Flymouth. Plymbridge Distributors Ltd. UK. Plymouth.
`p 633. 2009
`Andersscn KE. Campeau L, Olshansky B. Cardiac effects of
`muscarinic receptor antagonists used for voiding dysfunction.
`Br J Clin Pharm 2011 :72:1B6-196.
`
`Andersscn K-E. Chapple CR. Oxybutynin and the overactive
`bladder. World J Urol 2001;19(5):319
`Andersson KE. de Groat WC. McVary KT. et al. Tadalafil for the
`treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign
`prostatic hyperplasiaz pathophysiology and mechanism(s) of
`action. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Mar:30(3):292-301
`Andersscn K-E. Fullhase C. Soler R. Urothelial effects of
`oral antimuscarinic agents. Current Urology Reports 2008b
`Nov;9(5):459
`
`704
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2062 - 0278
`
`
`
`Andersson KE. Gralzke C. Phannacology of alpha1-adreno-
`ceptor antagonists in the lower urinary tract and central nervous
`system. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007 JuI;4('r'):36B-78.
`Andersson KE. Gratzke C. Hedlund P. The role of the transient
`receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of cation—selective chan-
`nets in the management of the overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2010
`Ocl;105(B):1114—27.
`
`Andersson K-E. Michel MC. Urinary Tract. Handbook of Expen-
`mental Pharmacology. Springer-Verlag. Benin Heidelberg 2011
`Andersson KE. Pehrson R. CNS involvement in overactive blad-
`der: pathophysiology and opportunities for pharmacological in-
`tervention. Dmgs. 2003;63(23):2595
`
`Andersson KE. Olshansky B. Treating patients with overactive
`bladder syndrome with antimuscarinics: heart rate considera-
`tions. BJU Intemational 2007;100:1007
`
`Andersson K-E. Persson K. The L—arginineInitn‘c oxide pathway
`and non-adrenergic. non-cholinergic relaxation of the lower uri-
`nary tract. 1993;Gen Pharmacol 24:833
`
`Andersson K-E. Uckert S. Stief C et al. Phosphodiesterases
`(PDEs) and PDE inhibitors for treatment of LUTS. Neurourol
`Urodyn 1997 Oct;26(6Suppl):92B
`
`Andersson K-E. Wein AJ. Pharmacology of the lower urinary
`tract - basis for current and future treatments of urinary inconti-
`nence. Pharmacol Rev 2004 Dec: 56(4):5B1
`Andersson KE. Sarawate C. Kahler KH. et al. Cardiovascular
`morbidity, heart rates and use of antimuscarinics in patients with
`overactive bladder. BJU Int. 2010 JuI;106(2):268-74.
`Andereson K. Wein A. Pharrnaoologic management of lower
`urinary tract storage and emptying failure.
`In Campbel|—Wa|sh
`Urology (Wain A. Kavoussi L. Novick A. Partin A. Peters C. eds).
`Elsevier Saunders. Philadelphia. 2012. pp196?-2002
`Andersson MC, Tobin G. Giglio D. Cholinergic nitric oxide re-
`lease from the urinary bladder mucosa in cyc|ophosphamide-
`induced cystitis of the anaesthetized rat. Br J Phannacol
`2008a:153:1438.
`
`Andrews MD. Fish P v. Blagg J. at al. Pyrimido [4.5-d] azepines
`as potent and selective 5-HT2 receptor agonists:design. syn-
`thesis and evaluation of PF-3236799 as a treatment for urinary
`incontinence. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2011;21(9):2T15-2720
`
`Aoki KR. Review of a proposed mechanism for the antinocic-
`eptive action of botulinum toxin type A. Neurotoxicology. 2005
`Oct;26(5):785
`
`Aoki K. Hirayama A. Tanaka N, et al. Ahigher level of prostaglan-
`din E2 in the urinary bladder in young boys and boys with lower
`urinary tract obstruction. Biomed Res. 2009 Dec;30(6):343-7.
`Apostolidis A. Brady CM, Yiangou Y. et al. Capsaicin receptor
`TRPV1 in urolhelium of neurogenic human bladders and effect
`of intravesical resiniferatoxin. Urology. 2005 Feb;65(2):400-5.
`
`Apostolidis A. Gonzales GE. Fowler CJ. Effect of intravesi-
`cal Resiniferatoxin (RTX) on lower urinary tract symptoms,
`urodynamic parameters. and quality of life of patients with
`urodynamic increased bladder sensation. Eur Urol. 2006
`Dec;50(6):1299
`
`Apostolidis A. Jacques TS. Freeman A, et al. Histological
`changes in the urothelium and suburothelium of human over-
`active bladder following intradetrusor injections of botulinum
`neurotoxin type A for the treatment of neurogenic or idiopathic
`detrusor overactivity. Eur Urol. 2008 Jun:53(6):1245-53
`Apostolidis A. Kirana PS. Chiu G. et al. Gender and ge dif-
`ferences in the perception of bother and health care seeking
`for lower urinary tract symptoms: results from the hospitalised
`and outpatients‘ profile and expectations study. Eur Urol. 2009
`Dec;5B(6):937-47.
`
`Apostolidis A. Popat R. Yiangou Y et al. Decreased sensory re-
`ceptors P2X3 and TRPV1 in suburothelial nerve fibers following
`intradetrusor injections of botulinum toxin for human detrusor
`overactivity. J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):9Tf
`Appell RA. Chancellor MB. Zobrist RH et al. Pharmacokinetics,
`metabolism. nd saliva output during transdennl and extended-
`release oral oxybutynin administration in healthy subjects. Mayo
`Clin Proc. 2003;78(6):696. 2003.
`
`Appell RA. Sand P. Dmochowski R et al. Overactive bladder".
`judging elfective control and treatment study group. Prospec-
`tive randomized controlled trial of extended-release oxybutynin
`chloride and tolterodine tartrate in the treatment of overac-
`tive bladder: results of the OBJECT Study. Mayo Clin Proc.
`2001;76{4):35B
`Araki
`I. TRP channels in urinary bladder mechanosensation
`Adv Exp Med Biol. 2011 ;704:861-79.
`
`Araki I, Du S, Kobayashi H. et al. Roles of mechanosensitive
`ion channels in bladder sensory
`transduction
`and
`overac-
`tive bladder. Int J Urol. 2008 Aug;15(8):681-7.
`
`Arisco AM. Brantly EK, Kraus SR. Oxybutynin extended release
`for the management of overactive bladder: a clinical review.
`Drug Des Devel Ther. 2009 Sep 21;3:151-61.
`
`Aschkenazi S. Botms S, Miller J et al. Overactive bladder symp-
`toms are not related to detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn.
`2007;26(5). abstract 35
`
`Asplund R. Sundberg B. Bengtsson P. Oral desmopressin for
`nocturnal polyuria in elderly subjects: a double-blind. placebo-
`controlled randomized exploratory study. BJU Int 1999;83:591
`Athanasopoulos A. Cruz F. The medical treatment of overactive
`bladder.
`including current and future treatments. Expert Opin
`Pharmacother. 2011 May; 12(T):1 041 -55
`
`Athanasopoulos A. Gyftopoulos K. Giannitsas K at al. G. Combi-
`nation treatment with an alpha-blocker plus an anticholinergic for
`bladder outlet obstruction: a prospective. randomized. controlled
`study. J Urol 2003; 16922253
`
`t-lussain I. et al. Brain responses to
`Athwal BS, Berkley KJ,
`changes in bladder volume and urge to void in healthy men.
`Brain. 2001 ;124(Pt 2):369
`Austin PF, Ferguson (3. Yan Y. et al. Combination therapy with
`desmopressin and an nticholinergic medication for nonre-
`spcnders to desmopressin for monosymptomatic nocturnal
`enuresis: a randomized. double-blind. placebo-controlled trial.
`Pediatrics. 2008 Nov;122(5):1027-32.
`AvelinoA., Charrua A, Frias B, Cruz co. Boudes M, de Rid-
`der D.. Cruz F. TRP channels in bladder function. 2012. Acta
`Physiol Scand (in press)
`
`Avelino A, Cruz F. TRPV1 (vanilloid receptor) in the urinary
`tract: expression. function and clinical applications. Naunyn
`Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacot. 2006 Ju|;373(4):2B7-99.
`
`Badawi JK, Seja T, Uecelehan H et al. Relaxation of human de-
`trusor muscle by selective beta-2 and beta-3 agonists and en-
`dogenous catecholamines. Urology. 2007 Apr;69(4):7B5
`
`Baa JH. Oh MM. Shim KS el al. The effects of long-term ad-
`ministration of oral desmopressin on the baseline secretion of
`antidiuretic hormone and serum sodium concentration for the
`treatment of nocturia: a circadian study. J. Urol 2007;‘l7B(1):200
`Baigrie RJ, Kalleher JP. Fawcett DP at al. Oxybutynin: is it safe?
`Br J Urol. 1988;62:319 Jonville AP. Dutertre JP. Autret E at al.
`Effets indesirahles du chlorure d'oxybutynine (Ditropan®). Ther-
`apie 1992;4';':389
`
`Baldessarini KJ. Drugs in the treatment of psychiatric disorders.
`In: Gilman at al. (Eds) The phannacological basis of therapeu-
`tics. 7th ed.. McMillan Publishing Co.. p387. 1985
`Baldo A. Berger TH. Kofler M et al.: The influence of intrathecal
`baclofen on detrusor function. A urodynamic study. Neurourol
`Urodyn. 2000. 19. 444 (abstract 53).
`Banakhar MA. Al-Shaiji TF. Hassouna MM. Pathophysiology of
`gyeractive bladder. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Feb 7. [Epub ahead
`print]
`Barendrecht MM. Oelke M. Laguna MP et al. Is the use of para-
`sympathomimetics for treating an underactive urinary bladder
`evidence-based? BJU Int 2007:99:749
`
`Basra RK . Wagg A. Chapple C et al . A review of adherence to
`drug therapy inpatients with overactive bladder . BJU Int 2008 ;
`102 : 774 — 9
`
`Bayliss M, Wu C, Newgreen D et al. A quantitative study of atro-
`pine-resistant contractile responses in human detrusor smooth
`muscle. from stable. unstable and obstructed bladders. J Urol
`1999;162:1833
`
`705
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2062 - 0279
`
`
`
`Bechara A. Romano S. Casabe A et al. Comparative eft'i-
`cacy assessment of tamsutosin vs. tamsulosin plus tarta-
`lafil in the treatment of LUTSIBPH. Pilot study. J Sex Med
`2003;5:2170-2178.
`
`Beckel JM. Holstege G. Neuroanatomy of the lower urinary
`tract. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2011;(202):99-116.
`Beckmann-Knopp S. Rietbroclv: S. Weyhenmeyer R et al. Inhib-
`itory effects of trospium chloride on cytochrome P450 enzymes
`in human liver microsomes. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1999;(6):299
`
`Beermann B, Hellstrom K. Rosen A. On the metabolism of pro-
`pantheline in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1972: 13(2):212
`
`Behr-Roussel D. Oger S. Caisey S. et al. Vardenafil decreases
`bladder afferent nerve activity in unanesthetized. decerebrate.
`spinal cord-injured rats. Eur Urol 2010;59: 272-279.
`Bent A. Gousse A. Hendrix S. Duloxetine compared with pla-
`cebo for the treatment of women with urinary incontinence.
`Neurourol Urodyn 2008:27(3):212-221
`Bent S. 1'iedt TN. Odden MC. et al. The relative safety of ephe-
`dra compared with other herbal products. Ann Intern Med.
`2003;138(6):4BB
`Berridge MJ. Smooth muscle cell calcium activation mecha-
`nisms. J Physiol. 2008 Nov 1;586(Pt 21 ):5047-61
`Bharucha AE. Seide B. Guan 2 et al. Effect of tolterodine on
`gastrointestinal transit and bowel habits in healthy subjects.
`Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008 Jun:20(6):643
`
`Biers SM. Reynard JM. Brading AF. The effects of a new se-
`lective beta3—adrenoceptor agonist {GW427353) on spontane-
`ous activity and detrusor relaxation in human bladder. BJU Int.
`2006 Dec;98(6):1310
`
`Bigger JT. Giardina EG, Perel JM et al. Cardiac antiarrhythmic
`effect of imipramine hydrochloride. N Enl J Med 1977;296:206
`Birder LA. de Groat WC. Mechanisms of disease: involvement
`of the urothelium in bladder dysfunction. Nat Clin Pract Urol.
`2007 Jan:4(1):46-54.
`Birder LA, Kanai AJ, de Groat WC, at al. Vanilloid receptor ex-
`pression suggests a sensory role for urinary bladder epithelial
`cells. Proc Natl Aced Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 6;98(23):13396-401.
`Birder LA, Nakamura Y. Kiss 8, et al. Altered urinary bladder
`function in mice lacking the vanilloid receptor TRPV1. Net Neu-
`rosci. 2002 Sep;5(9):85B-60.
`Blaivas JG, Lebib KB, Michalik J et al. Cystometric response
`to propentheline in detrusor hyperreflexia: therapeutic implica-
`tions. J Urol. 1980;124:259
`
`Blok BF. Sturms LM, Hoistege G. Brain activation during mictu-
`rltion in women. Brain. 1998:121 ( Pt 11):2033
`Blue DR. Daniels DV. Gever JR et al. Pharmacological charac-
`teristics of Re 115-1240. a selective? 1A-1L- adrenoceptor par-
`tial agonist: a potential therapy for stress urinary incontinence.
`BJU Int 2004;93(1):162
`
`Blyweert W. Van Der Aa F. De Ridder D. Cannabinoid therapy
`in detrusor overactivity: local versus systemic effect in a spinal-
`ised rat model. Neurourol Urodyn 2003;22:379-530.
`Bodeker RH. Madersbacher H. Neumeister C. Zetlner M. Dose
`escalation improves therapeutic outcome: post hoc analysis of
`data from a 12-week. multicentre. double-blind. parallel-group
`trial of trospium chloride in patients with urinary urge inconti-
`nence. BMC Urol. 2010 Sep 14;10:15.
`Bolduc S. Moore K. Nadeau G. et al. Prospective open label
`study of solifenacin for overactive bladder in chitdren. J Urol.
`2010 Dct;1B4(4 Suppl):16B8-73.
`Bosch RJLH. Griffiths DJ. Blom JHM et al. Treatment of be-
`nign prostatic hyperplasia by androgen deprivation: effects on
`prostate size and urodynamic parameters. J Urol 1989:1141 :68
`Bosch JL Weiss JP. The Prevalence and Causes of Nocturia. J
`Urol 2010;13-1(2): 440-446.
`
`Boy 8. Self C, Braun PM et al. Retrospective Analysis of treat-
`ment outcomes and medical care of patients with neurogenic
`detrusor overactivity (NDO) receiving BOTOX therapy. Euro-
`pean Urology Suppiements. 2008:? (31212
`
`Brady CM. Apostolidis AN, Harper M at al. Parallel changes in
`bladder suburothelial vanilloid receptor TRPV1 and pan-neu-
`ronal marker PGP9.5 immunoreactivity in patients with neuro-
`genic detrusor overactivity after intravesical resiniferatoxin treat-
`ment. BJU Int. 2004 Apr;93(8):770
`Brady CM. DasGupta R. Dalton C. et al. An open-label pilot
`study of cannabis-based extracts for bladder dysfunction in ad-
`vanced multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2004;10:425-433.
`
`Braverman AS, Doumanian LR, Ruggieri MR. Sr. M2 and M3
`muscarinic receptor activation of urinary bladder contractile sig-
`nal transduction.
`ll. Denervated rat bladder. J Phannacol Exp
`Ther 2006;316:375
`
`Braverman AS. Karlovsky M. Pontari MA et al. Aging and hyper-
`trophy change the muscarinic receptor subtype mediating blad-
`der contraction from M3 towards M2. J Urol 2002;16'! Suppl.:
`Abstract #170.
`
`Bravennan AS, Kohn IJ. Luthin GR et al. Prejunctional M1 facili-
`tatory and M2 inhibitory muscarinic receptors mediate rat blad-
`der contractility. Am J Physiol 1998274: R51?
`Bravennan AS, Luthin GR. Ruggieri MR. M2 muscarinic receptor
`contributes to contraction of the denervated rat urinary bladder.
`Am J Physiol 1993:2'r'5:R1654
`
`Braverman AS. Ruggieri MR, Sr. Hypertrophy changes the mus-
`carinic receptor subtype mediating bladder contraction from M3
`toward M2. Am J Physiol 2003;285:R701
`
`Brennan PE, Whitlock GA. Ho DK, et at. piscovery of a novel
`azepine series of potent and selective 5-HTZQ agonists as po-
`tential treatments for urinary incontinence. Broorg Med Chem
`Lett 2009:1931-999-5003
`
`Bridgewater M. Brading AF. Evidence for a non-nitrergic inhibito-
`ry innervation in the pig urethra. Neurourol Urodyn 1993:1235‘!
`
`Briggs KS. Castleden CM, Asher MJ. The effect of flevoxate on
`uninhibited detrusor contractions and urinary incontinence in the
`elderly. J Urol 1980;123:665
`
`Brubaker L. FitzGera|d MP. Nocturnal polyuria and nocturia relief
`in patients treated with solifenacin for overactive bladder symp-
`toms. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.