throbber
European Journal of Pharmacology
`
`Thv l:l.'R(Ji’F.\N J(,)URN.'\L OF l‘H.»\R.VL’\<‘()l,()()\" pullli-has full-Icnglh |JlIP\.‘I'.\. .‘ih(3l| L‘Ul'l1ll'lLll'1iL‘.']ll0I1.\mid rapid cm11t11uIm'arinn~. on rho |11cclmmsrn_~.' of
`.,;_-[inn pi .'h:'mu:u|
`.~‘uh.\l:Jm.‘c.\ a|'fc\1|rxg hm|.Ig|L'.1|
`.~_\ -.lc|1\.\.
`'1hL' 7|nu.'I|;1l
`:11.-:0 L'nn~nJcr- .\h|\ll IL.'\'JL‘\\\ um! nu‘;-.:¢l:||_u ll p;1.g(~_\ in print] mu-ndc.J Lu ;_|._-b-(nu,
`n:.._-n| ;](I'.;||)(‘(‘\ in r.1]1|L1i},' \|1,‘\'\'1[|fILI1g l'IL'Id-u lhnl .Lrr \\1lhin il.~ .\\:0pr:
`
`.\lnIucu|ur and cellular p|1;1rn1.1«:rn1ng_\-.
`.md _-.-hurt cnrn|11uni\,'gL|iuI.I.~ arc gruupcd undm [hr 1‘n|lnwin_-_- }u'.'n|¢ng\ PMrIn:u.'ng:cnt\rn|us
`|‘pI1 IL-nglh p..p¢;\
`\'cua..p!mrn!ucu|ug} and iIlIEll‘(‘_l'.~I.l. Bn‘|Iil\iLllll'iN ;)h‘.|rI:|'.u'tI|u;_-y. C-';u‘LIiu\".L-«.'1I]ur pheLI'rI1‘.u_'u|ng1_\. F-‘u|xru::uury_ g.:sIrnir|Iu.~nn'.1| am! urugunilnl p|1'.«r|Imm!(1g_s'.
`|mm|muph‘.HImucnlugy um] u1f|:1mIn:1IuIn. and lind-.>\.‘riI1u.‘ |1|'I.|rl1l.‘|L‘iI|L\g_\J.
`
`! lhr}: arc .\uh_iL'L'! I-I CdLl:II‘Iul IL‘\ Icw. (1) Ihcy hm L" nut hcs.'n and will nut ht:
`i
`.Irc lh‘L't'|1lL'£l ual lhu uIldcr\la.LIM1in'__'1Il.Il‘ {
`'1:|l
`.\1.:I1ux.‘r|pI:- \L|hII1IHr.‘|| In lhr _|11Il|
`gzuhlnlu-J Ir. uhnlc or III pzul m ‘.|l'I_\' nIhcr_murn:|l and I 1) l|:<: recmn|I1cI1daIh-‘-I12- tmm Ihc cicclinuulinrl nf Ilclsinkn and 'l‘ukyu. Iur huIn.'m~. and the l;‘umpc.-m
`('umn*.uni|y :_I||n](||m‘.~. ux ;qL-cuplnd prtrmplcs fur l|'l'.2 my 111' uxpcriwcnlul :u\un.1|.~ ‘nun: hcrn :uJ|1cruuJ In Thu Fznnrnpmn Jmurnul cal
`l"h.;r|ua;-ulngy \uiL1_
`‘.3Icr::InrL'. 1>':\}.
`r.'nrI.\1d:|
`:|1.1nu~unpI\ th.‘1l L‘.c\L‘:\hL' L'\pL‘1‘I|'Ilcn1~. which have '|!cuJl
`\::Lr1'is:d out under :1;1pI‘r\\':ll of" un I?l:»lllU[1Ul'liIl m‘ lncul :-l|1ic-. £u\l'Ilfl'|i1[L'C
`-\uI!'.nr\ suml -.l:Ilu nu lllc m:nnnL|'.p1 lhul prIIl0L‘1IlCnII1|1|i\.‘.\' u. illl lhr |1i1I1lL‘ll|;ll'l't:L‘[)ll'll'|‘|CtI(!:lli(\l1;lrM1l|’I;1E ;:ppm\ :1! ul' |}|L'i| pIulLu;u|-, u;_1_-.nh|,|1u¢_-LI
`
`\ Gu;;l._- lnr \u1hnr-. |\' puhlixlwsl :1l lhr end 0!‘ much iksuu
`
`lhundmj m 1'«Jh‘.‘. Fnundang s.‘L|1lm.\: Dzn-id dc Wiucl and I:Ic:|u:'s ~'-"In Rn.~r~um
`
`I-Zdimrx: W.ll. GISPEN. lilrulu lula-.urm::n)
`
`F.P. .'\'I.lK.f\.'\«1 P. l.'lrus.‘hl
`
`3I.*o'-HIRIIIK vtlilurz
`
`F. I7.N(iF.l .5. Lilrcchl
`
`FuuI‘Idim.: rdilm‘: D. UP. 't\«'l[7.[)
`
`I-Icliluriul bu-nrrl:
`
`1.M .\I)("()(_'K.Lm1uJm1
`C .—’\DVl{|\'l]'*'.R. Paris
`1.“ B;\E‘r'E.\'S,(‘ir.'mzI(|u
`L. s.\r<'n1<'). P6;-.~
`.-\. Bl€.%PM.[>\’. S:nnl-Pcluxlaurg
`(1. B|(_‘-GK). f‘.-nglinri
`5.l). IiR,\l.\'. Lnudml
`().L]. BR(.)l)D]:l. Hulk‘
`H. Bl,'l.T. Wilrijk
`DH B'1’l.UT\'I)_ (_)m:I|m
`J5. C:\'W :\Hi:]\Jl. Milatll
`(Lil. (IHU. lloug, Kong
`U ('I\-'[LI.LI. In-inc
`
`('m1.sull:mls;
`
`R. D.-’I.!\"l'ZI-IR. Bnrzlcalux
`F. [)Rr\GU, (".1mui:1
`M. I7.ND()H. ‘:’:1:11:|g;.1{:n
`E.FRIL)[i.»\r1c|
`CLI’. (.iliE.Hl.'\R'I‘. luv-'.1('il3
`M. H.=\M(.PN. Paris
`M. I.r’\ZI)l.iNSKl. V:11hmmv.'
`R. LI-IFl7.B\.’R1‘.. (JUTII
`MJ. LUHS1-'.. VV'hr2.bur~c-_
`W’. L(”)S(‘IH'§R. ”&.ll1!'lU\‘L‘.r
`J. ML‘C_'l'|.[.(}(‘}{. FI(|inhu1'g|1
`K.P. Ml.\'NE‘M.-KN. Atlanta
`5. NAIIORSKI, I.c.nL'c~+tL'I
`
`D.\»\r'. NF-.HIE|{'|'. Cizncinnali
`J.M. PI-'[ZII..SCIIII-_l'[1R, Fr.xnkl'ur|
`.!.P. PIN. Mnmpcllicr
`R. PR?.E7.Wl.0('Kl, Krakfiw
`P.R. SAX!-..\l:’\. Roilcrdanui
`A, SCHOU SHOE. Cklpcllhugell
`1‘. SI-§()l..\J|(IK. }{uckcnsu<.'k
`
`.!.C. .‘3T0(.'I .F.T. Straxxhmnrg
`12.5. VIZ]. Budapest
`SJ’. \'~"EiL(.‘1I. Richnlutld
`B.J.R \-VHITTLI7.. Lnndun
`Z. WIES!;'NFli[.[)~}IALLIN. Huddingc
`I. VN-FEKBERG. Upp~..'I|‘.l
`
`li. liF.UB[.EiR. (iraz: J. ROCK.-’\I:'.RT. Mmllpcllicr; S..|. (‘C)(_}I"IiR. Li\'crpuu}‘.
`l.Lmd:
`.\|‘/.l‘.\'n\|.-\N_ l"i1lshLn'gh‘. K.-E. .‘\N|3liRSSON.
`Ii.
`R, (.'0L'TI.'R[-I,
`|\1unIrc;1l;(i DI (THY.-\R.—'\. C'.|;_.'li:II'i: G.I/..
`l‘I;'[JIiRS'[‘EIN. West Point: A.\‘\-’. I-URL) HUTCHINSON, VVL‘\l Pnimt
`J..‘\
`(iAR(.'i.-‘N-S."\|I\-'2.
`.V1C\iL‘1>Ci|}‘;t'\.R. GREEN.
`[.l‘1lL|.l)1|Z:‘\. HF.RMA;\'. /\nlwcrpcn: P. HOl.Z.1-‘.R,G1'.'J;I.; l).1lOYl'-IR. Basel;
`J P. HL'lD()BR()-T(')R().San1i::go: EC".
`lH_I[.Ml;'. Lnmlnn; K.}1..I.v\K0BS.Esscr1;I]. KARAKI, 'l'ukyu; H. KLFINERT. Muinr,
`K.P LESCH.
`\\'iI|'zhurg.; BR l.l.'(TC‘.HF.‘iE. Ann mhnr; H. NIFURS. G|‘nning<:n',
`.V[..l. MII.|...\N.
`(frni.~'.sy—surSciI1c; F. MOR().\'l.
`Flnrcmrc. T. N.-KBESI-IIINIA, N'I'()}u: M. OTSL'K:\.
`'l'nLy0: J.N. PE.\-‘.\IEiE‘A'I'l1EiR. Pxukuilincz A. PERTOVAARA. Turku; R
`
`QUIRIUK’. Verdun; U. RAVI
`‘S, E.\.~cu‘. M.[3.;\. RF.|'I‘H.
`('hia.':1gu: H. S(.'HOE.V[/XKER. Bugncux; J.l".M. S.'VH’l'S. Msliislrichtz K.
`ST.-\RKY’.. FI'c'|bur;_{ im Iircisgalu; L..‘\. LVRHAN. I-Emu]; R..l. Wl.\lQL.‘iS'|f'. (';J.Inhmlgc_ MA
`
`|5aitent Uviher, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2032 - 0001
`
`

`
` European Journal of Pharinacology 327 (l99'l} 195 --20?
`
`Tolterodine — a new bladder—selectivc antimuscarinic agent
`
`Lisbeth Nilvebrant “", Karl—Ei'ik Andersson ", Per-Goran Gillberg °, Matthias Stahl “,
`Bengt Sparf ‘
`.9wi1r.i'i.=n
`.‘lvlrdi'<.‘ui' Department Ural'ii_t.;y. Pharmuria & t'.."pjohrr AB. Sa7.§.’r’iI. Upp.€ai'rr.
`!' Department ofCi'i'm'cui’ PfrarmaL'u!ugv_ Ufllil.‘t'.’rSli")‘ Hospital, Limd, Sir:-o'er:
`' Degummem ufPharmuc'oI'ogy. Pharmrariarli U}'J,I'oi1rr iii‘). !..i'pp.m.'a. Sweden
`Received I? October 1996; revised [3 March l99'i". accepted lll March I997
`
`I
`
`Abstract
`
`Toltcrodine is a new muscarinic receptor antagonist intended for the treatment of urinary urge incontinence and other symptoms
`related to an overactive bladder. The aim of the present study was to compare the antiitiuscarinie properties of tollerodine with those of
`oxybutynin.
`in vitro and in vivo. Tolterodine effectively inhibited earbachol-indiiced C0l'tl|’itCllOnS of isolated strips of urinary bladder
`from guinea pigs (Kn 3,0 nM; p.‘\2 8,6; Schild slope 0.97) and humans (KM 4.U nM; PA: 8,4; Sehild slope
`l.(l-1)
`in ii
`C0ncentratiorrdepcndeitt. competitive manner. The affinity of tolterodine was similar to that derived for oxybutynin (KB 4.4 nM; pA2
`8.5; Schild slope 0.89)
`in the guinea-pig bladder. Tolterodine (Ill -2103 rimol/kg (0.01-l mg/kg);
`intravenous infusion) was
`significantly more potent
`in inliibiiing zicetylclioline-induced urinary bladder contraction than electrically-induced salivation in the
`anaesthetised eat.
`in contrast, oxybutynin displayed the opposite tissue selectivity. Radioligand binding data showed that tolterodirie
`bound with high affinity to museziririie receptors in iiririiiry bladder (K, 2.7 nM), heart (K,
`l.6 nM). cerebral cortex (K. 0.75 nM) and
`parotid gland (K; 4.8 nMl from guinea pig: and in urinary bladder from humans (K, 3.3 :iM).
`'l'olti:rodine and oxybuiynin were
`equipotent. except in the parotid gland. where uxybutynin bound with 8-times higher affinity (K: 0.62 nM). Binding data on human
`niiiniczirinic ml—m5 receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells showed that oxybiitynin,
`in contrast
`to tolterudiniz. exhibits
`selectivity (10-fold) for muscarinic m3 over m2 receptors. The KB value determined for Oxybutynin (4_4 nM) in functional Studies on
`guinea-pig bladder correlated better with the binding affinity at rnuscarinic M2/m2 receptors (K, 2.3 and 6.7 nM) than at inuscarinic
`M_,/iri3 receptors (K, 0.62 and 0.67 nM). The tissue selectivity demonstrated for tolterodinc in vivo cannot be attributed to selectivity for
`a single muscarinic receptor subtype. However, the combined in vitro and in vivo data on tollerodine and oxybutynin may indicate either
`that miiscartnie M,/m3 receptors in glands are more sensitive to blockade than those in bladder smooth muscle. or that musearinic
`M 1/m2 receptors contribute to bladder contraction.
`
`KL‘_t=\t'0rt:t’.i" Urinary bladder contraction: Saliiatiort; Muscarinic receptor subtype; Muscariitie receptor antagonist; (Guinea pig); (Cat): (Human)
`
`I. Introduction
`
`Tolterodine (Fig. I) is a new musearinie receptor antag-
`onist
`intended for the treatment of urinary urge inconti-
`nence and other symptoms of an overactive bladder. The
`pharmacological treatment of urge incontinence has for a
`long time been based on musearinie receptor antagonists,
`e.g.. proparitlieline, emeproniurn and oxybiitynin (Anders-
`son, I988; Wcin et al..
`l994}. and it
`is generally agreed
`that contractions of the human urinary bladder are medi-
`ated mainly through stimulation of acetylcholine mus-
`
`’ Corresponding author ‘tel: (46-lit] lfi-4-120;
`
`l-‘ax
`
`(46-18) If:-6464.
`
`I993). Oi-tybulynin is cur-
`earinie receptors (Aitdcrsson,
`rently considered to be the drug of choice in the treatment
`of bladder overactivity (Yarker et al., I995}. The effective-
`ness of oxybutynin has been demonstrated in several con-
`trolled clinical studies, but
`the incidence of classical an-
`timuscarinie side effects often leads to discontinuation of
`treatment. Dryncss ofthe mouth is the most prevalent side
`effect, experienced by at least 50% of patients on oxybii-
`tynin therapy (Yarlccr ct al., 1995).
`The existence of molecularly distinct muscarinic recep-
`tor subtypes has been well established (I-lulme et al., I990;
`Caulfield. l993). Thus. live genes encoding for musearinic
`receptors (ml—m5) have been cloned and expressed in cell
`lines, while three mitscarinie receptor subtypes (M,—M3)
`
`0014-2999/97/S17 tit) Copyright 1‘) I997 tilqei-ier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
`PU soot 4-2999t97)0006't.tt
`
`N01 iCE:
`THIS MATEPAAL MAY BE
`PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT
`LAW (TITLE 7. us. CODE)
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2032 - 0002
`
`

`
`I96
`
`I.
`
`.‘Vi.lt-I.-brunt (4 m’ / European .Im4rnai'oj Pharmncnfogt‘ 3.7? H99 71 I95 -207’
`
`Fig.
`
`I. Chemical structure uftnlterntline.
`
`can be distinguished by pharmacological means. A fourth
`pharmacological subtype (M4) has also been defined, al-
`though muscarinie My-selective antagonists are not yet
`available. Roughly, muscarinie M,
`receptors prevail
`in
`neuronal
`tissues while the heart appears to contain a
`homogenous population of muscarinie M2 receptors and
`exocrine glands are considered to contain mainly mus-
`carinie M3 receptors. The muscarinie M,
`receptors are
`found in striatum, cortex and peripheral rabbit lung. How-
`ever,
`it
`is commonly found that more than one receptor
`subtype coexist within a tissue or cell (I-lulme et al., 1990;
`Caulfield, I993).
`Many smooth muscles contain both muscarinie M3
`(‘cardiac’) and muscarinie M, (‘glandular’) receptors (for
`review. see Eglen et al., I994). The presence of mRNA for
`muscarinie m2 and m3 receptors has been demonstrated in
`the urinary bladder of rat, pig (Macda et al.,
`I988) and
`humans (Yamaguchi ct al..
`I994). Radioligand binding
`data indicate the presence of muscarinie M2 and N13, as
`well as muscarinie M,, receptors in human bladder tissue
`and that muscarinie M3 receptors may predominate (Kondo
`et al., 1995; Wammack et aI., I995). On the other hand,
`irnmunoprecipitation data indicate that
`the proportion of
`muscarinic m2 anti m3 receptors is 3:1 in the bladders
`from humans, guinea pigs and rabbits. and 9:I
`in the rat
`bladder {Wang ct al.. 1995). Radioligand binding data on
`selective antagonists in the guinea-pig bladder (Nilvebrant
`and Sparf, 1986, I988) and other smooth muscles (Girtddo
`et al.. I987; Michel and Whiting, 1988: Eglcn et al., 1994)
`most often reflect the pharmacology of the muscarinic M:
`receptors. This probably rclleets a predominance of mus-
`carinie M3/m2 receptors in smooth muscles and the rather
`limited subtype selectivity of available antagonists. llow-
`ever.
`functional
`in vitro data on a number of selective
`antagonists indicate that
`the contraction of most smooth
`muscles.
`including the urinary bladder,
`is mediated by
`muscarinie M,
`receptors (Caulfield,
`I993; Eglen et al.,
`I994; Tobin and Sjijgreri,
`I995; Wang et al.,
`I995). The
`functional role of muscarinic M3 receptors is still mysteri-
`ous, but emerging evidence suggests that the importance of
`the muscarinic M,/m2 receptors in various smooth mus-
`cles might have been underestimated (Zhang and Buxton,
`I991; Griffin and Ehlert, I992; Caulficld, I993; Thomas ct
`al., I993; Eglcn ct aI., I994; Chen et al., (995; Roddy et
`al., 1995).
`
`to compare the
`The aim of the present study was
`antimuscarinie properties of tolterodine and oxybutynin.
`Oxybutynin has been characterised as
`a muscarinie
`M,/M3-selective antagonist (Nilvebrttnt and Sparf, 1982,
`l983b,
`I986; Lazareno et al.,
`I990; Noronha-Blob and
`Kachur,
`l99l). For purposes of comparison,
`the classical
`non-selective muscarinie receptor antagonist atropine was
`also included. The inhibitory effects oftolterodine, oxybLI—
`tynin and atropine on urinary bladder contraction and
`salivary secretion in vivo were studied in the anaesthetised
`cat. The in vitro studies comprised ratlioligand binding and
`functional studies on bladders from guinea pigs and hu-
`mans. Radioligand binding studies were also carried ottt on
`parotid gland, heart and cerebral cortex from guinea pigs,
`as well as on human muscarinie ml-—m5 receptors ex-
`pressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. In vitro studies
`
`i
`2.1.}. Guinea—pig ri.s‘srres
`Male guinea pigs (Dunkin Hartley. weighing 300-500
`g) were killed by a blow on the neck and exsanguinated.
`The cerebral cortex was dissected on ice and the other
`
`tissues in Krebs—l-lenseleit solution, as previously described
`(Nilvebraut and Sparf,
`I982.
`I9R3ti. 1986). Urinary blad-
`ders for
`functional
`in vitro studies were cut
`into strip
`preparations (3><3 X I2 mm). Tissues
`for
`radioligand
`binding studies were homogenised, as described below.
`
`2.} 2. Human urimzry bladder
`Detrusor specimens from the dome of the bladder were
`obtained front 23 patients (mean age 63 ;t 2 years; range
`4-4—7S years) undergoing surgery for bladder malignancy.
`Some of the patients had received preoperative radiation
`therapy (20 Gy). However, the muscarinie receptor density
`in the human bladder and the affinity for muscarinie
`receptor antagonists does not appear to be influenced by
`age, sex and radiotherapy (Nilvebrartt et al., 1985). All
`specimens were taken from a macroscopically normal pan
`of the detrusor. No mueosal
`tissue was
`included. For
`
`in vitro studies, dissected bladder specimens
`functional
`into strip preparations (1 X I X3 mm; 6-I2
`were cut
`strips were obtained from each patient). Tissue for radioli-
`gand binding studies was frozen at -70°C‘ and stored at
`this temperature until used in the assays.
`
`2.1.3. Cht'ne.se hamster ovary (CHO) cells
`CHO cell
`lines transfeeted with genes encoding the
`human muscarinic receptor subtypes ml. m2, m3 and m4,
`respectively, were obtained from Dr T. Bonner, National
`Institutes of Health. USA, while cells expressing the m5
`subtype were obtained from Dr M. Brann. University of
`Vermont, USA (Buckley et al., 1989). The cells were
`
`'l5'atent 0Tv'ner", UC'B'"Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2032 - 0003
`
`

`
`I. Niles-‘Iran! 9: or’ /‘ European Jmrrrra! of Pharmacology" 327 {I997} I95-207
`
`I97
`
`cultured in a medium consisting of equal parts of Dul-
`becco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and HATWS
`Fl2,
`respectively. The medium was supplemented with
`foetal bovine serum (l()%), I.-glutamine (4 mM) and peni-
`cillin/strcptomycin (I00 U/ml), at 37°C in a humidified
`atmosphere (7% CO2, 93% air) in tissue culture flasks or
`roller bottles. Cultures were continuously harvested every
`second or third day and stored at
`-7U°("'unti| usctl
`itl
`radioligand binding studies.
`
`2.1.4. Firnctirmal in citm .s'rudics
`
`Guinea-pig and human bladder strips were transferred
`to jacketed tissue baths (5 ml) and mounted between two
`hooks. One of the hooks was connected to a force trans-
`ducer (FT 03. Grass instruments). The baths contained a
`temperature-controlled (37°C) Krebs-Henseleit solution,
`which was continuously aerated with carbogen (93.5% or
`95% O2/6.5% or 5% CO3) to maintain pH at 7.4. Isomet-
`ric tension was recorded by a Polygraph (Grass. model 79
`D). A resting tension of 5 mN was initially applied to each
`preparation. During stabilisation (45-60 min) the strips
`were repeatedly washed and the resting tension was ad-
`justed. The Krebs-Henselcit solution used for guinea-pig
`bladder contained (mM): NaCl ([19), KCl (4.6), CaCl_,
`(L5), MgCl2 (1.2),
`l\"aHCOJ (20), NaH,FO, (L4) and
`glucose (I 1). The Krebs-llenseleit buffer used for human
`preparations had a slightly different composition (mM):
`NaCl (118). KCl(4.6), CaCl3 (1.5), MgSO4 (L2), Natl-{CO3
`(24.9). KH_.PO, (1.4) and glucose (l 1). When responses
`of human strips to K‘ were studied, the NaCl in the Krebs
`solution was replaced by KC] to give a K ' concentration
`of 124 mM.
`
`Guinea-pig preparations were exposed to a standard
`concentration of the muscarinic receptor agonist carbachol
`(3 p.M; ECXD)
`to establish reproducible responses (three
`subsequent contractions with s 10% variation in ampli-
`tude) bclbre a concentration t response curve to car-bachol
`(control) was generated using cumulative addition. After
`exposure of the bladder strips to a fixed concentration of
`antagonist for 60 min (Nilvebrant, 1986),
`the concentra-
`tion—rcsponsc curve to carbachol was repeated in the
`presence oi‘ antagonist. Responses were expressed as a
`percentage of the maximal contractile response elicited by
`earbachol in the control curve.
`The viability of human bladder preparations was con-
`trolled by exposure to K* (I24 mM) before cumulative
`concentration—rcsponsc curves to carbachol were estab-
`lished (control). Two consecutive control curves were
`generated before incubation with tolterodine. but all
`rc-
`sponscs were expressed as a percentage of the maximal
`contractile response in the control curve immediately pre-
`ceding incubation with toltcrodinc. The strips were ex-
`posed to tolterodine for 20 min before the concentration-
`response curve to carbachol was repeated.
`When human bladder strips were stimulated electrically,
`two electrodes were placed on each side of the preparation
`
`to it. Stimulation was delivered by a Grass
`and parallel
`S88 electrical stimulator as single square-wave pulses with
`a duration of 0.8 ms. The voltage was suprarnaximal and
`the stimulation was given in 5 s trains with an interval of2
`min. The frequency interval used was
`I-45 Hz. The
`frequency-response relations were established for each
`Strip, and a frequency producing 70—80% of maximum
`response was selected. The strips were stimulated at this
`frequency at 2-min intervals. and tolterodine was then
`added cumulatively.
`EC50 values for carbachol were determined in the ab-
`sence and presence of antagonist, respectively. The affinity,
`of the antagonist was calculated as the dissociation con-
`stant Kn (Schild, 1949). The mean: S.E.M. of the KB
`values determined using different antagonist concentra-
`tions in (ii) preparations was calculated. The ICSO value
`for tolterodine in electrically stimulated preparations was
`calculated by linear interpolation.
`
`2.1.5.
`studies
`
`il/frmbrane preparations for
`
`radirfligand binding
`
`All preparation steps were carried out on ice. lluman
`bladder specimens obtained from different patients were
`never pooled. Thawed human bladder samples, dissected
`guinea-pig bladders, parotid glands and hearts were ho-
`mogenised in ten volumes of ice-cold sodium-potassium
`phosphate buffer (50 mM; pH 7.4) containing 1 mM
`phenylmethylsulphonyl tluoride, using a Polytron PT-3000
`(guinea-pig urinary bladder and parotid gland: 26 000 rpm,
`2X 15 s; guinea-pig heart:
`i300 rpm, 2 X 15 s; human
`urinary bladder: 26000 rpm, 3 X 15 s; with a 30 s cooling
`interval between bursts). Guinea-pig cerebral cortex was
`homogenised using a Potter-Elvehjem Tcllon/glass ho-
`mogeniser. Before use in the assays, tissue homogenates
`were
`diluted with
`ice-cold phosphatc/phcnylmethyl-
`sulphonyl fluoride buffer to a final protein concentration of
`50.3 mg/ml.
`llomogcnatcs of CHO cells containing
`muscarinie ml—mS receptors were prepared in 1-2 ml of
`ice-cold sodium phosphate buffer (25 mM, pH 7.4) con-
`taining 5 mM MgCl1 (Buckley ct al., 1989) and I mM
`phenylmethylsulphonyl
`fluoride. using a glass—glass ho-
`mogeniscr. The cell homogenates were diluted with ice-
`eold phosphate/phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride buffer to
`l0O(l—|000O times the original wet weight (protein con-
`centrations of 4-190 pg/ml) before use in the assays.
`Protein concentration in the final tissue homogenates and
`in cell homogenates containing > 25 pg/ml were deter-
`mined by the method of‘ Lowry et al. (1951). The BioRad
`Protein Assay (Bradford, 1976) was used for cell ho-
`mogenates with protein concentrations below 25 pg/ml.
`Bovine serum albumin was used as standard for both
`methods.
`
`2.I.6. Radiofigarid binding as'.s'u)'.s
`The affinities of the unlabelled drugs were determined
`by competition experiments, using [3l-l](—)-l—quir1uC-
`
`ZPateTnt Otmei: UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2032 - 0004
`
`

`
`|9R
`
`I. Niirehrarrr ct tzl / Ertrapprm Journal rifPharmr7rnlngy 327H99 7) !9.5—2t?."
`
`lidinyl benzilate as tracer. Non-specific binding was deter-
`mined in the presence of IO u.M atropine. Total and
`non—s.pecific binding of [Jl-l](—)-l-quinuelidinyl benzilate
`was detemtined in six samples each, while samples con-
`taining unlabelled antagonist were run in triplicate.
`Tissue homogenates (1.0 ml) were incubated with
`[3H](—)—1—qu‘muclidinyl benzilate (2 nM) and different
`concentrations of unlabelled antagonist under conditions of
`equilibrium: guinea-pig urinary bladder, 25°C for 60 min
`(Nilvebrant and Sparf, 19833.); parotid gland, 25"C for 2l0
`min (Nilvebrant and Sparf. 1982); heart and cerebral cor-
`tex, 25°C for 80 min (Nilvcbrant and Span". 1985); and
`human bladder, 25°C for I80 min (Nilvcbrant ct al., 1985).
`lncubations were tenninated by centrifugation (Nilvebrant
`and Sparf, 1983a). The pellets were washed and the tubes
`allowed to dry before the tips containing the pellets were
`cut off and transferred to scintillation vials. Soluene-I00
`(Packard) was added (200 ttl/tube) and the samples were
`left overnight for solubilisation ofthe pellet. A scintillation
`cocktail (lnstafluor or Ultimn Gold. Packard) was added
`and radioactivity detemtined by liquid scintillation spec-
`trometry (Packard TriCarb model 2200 CA or 2500 TR). A
`quench correction curve was used for the conversion of
`cpm to dpm.
`lines containing human
`Binding studies on CHO cell
`muscarinic ml—m5 receptors were run in 24-well cultures
`plates. Cell homogenates (l.0 ml) were incubated with
`["ll](~)~l-quinuclidinyl bertzilate (1 nM) and different
`concentrations of unlabelled drug under conditions of equi-
`librium (37°C for 300 min). The optimal protein concentra-
`tions and the time required to reach equilibrium for each
`cell
`line was detcnnined in a separate series of experi-
`ments (data not shown).
`lncubations were tenninated by
`filtration through a cell harvester (Packard) onto GF/C
`filters (Packard). The filter plates were dried, 200 pl of
`Microscint (Packard) added and the radioactivity was de-
`termined in a Packard Top Count scintillation counter
`(et'l'tcicncy of 44-46%).
`Data are presented as mean: S.E.M. of (n) experi-
`ments.
`In the competition binding experiments,
`[C50 val-
`ues for the antagonists were determined from the experi-
`mental concentration—inhibition curves. Dissociation cott-
`
`stants (K) were calculated by correcting the ICE) values
`for the radioligand-induced parallel shift and the differ-
`ences in receptor concentration, using the method de-
`scribed by Jacobs et al. (I975); see also Nilvebrant and
`Spat‘f(l9S2, 1983b) for details.
`ln order to verify that the density of muscarinic recep-
`tors
`in the human bladder and the affinity (Kd)
`for
`[3Hl(-)-l-quinuclidinyl benzilate were within the ranges
`previously reported (Nilvebrant cl al.,
`I985), saturation
`experiments were performed in specimens from six indi-
`viduals. Samples containing different concentrations of
`[3H]( — )-l-quinuclidinyl benzilate (0.05—5 nM) were incu-
`bated under Conditions of equilibrium (25°C for [80 min),
`using atropine for determination of non-specific binding.
`
`Receptor density and Kd were determined by Scatchard
`analysis of the saturation data. These parameters (receptor
`density 122:9 fmol/mg protein (range 93-146); Kd
`0.12 i 0.02 nM) were within the range of those previously
`detemiined in a series of I4 patients (receptor density
`1641* 15 fmol/mg protein (range 77-231); Kd 0.14-_t-_
`0.02 n:Vl) (Nilvcbrant et al., I985).
`
`22. In cico studies
`
`2.2. I. /lm'mal'.r and anaesthesia
`
`Twenty-five female European short-haired cats (2.2—3.4
`kg; 6-10 months old) were used. The animals were de-
`privcd of food overnight before the experiment. They were
`initially anaesthetised with an intrapcritoncal
`injection of
`pentobarbital sodium (30-39 mg/kg), followed by intra-
`venous (i.v.) administration of or-ehloralusc (25 mg/ml in
`‘Va sodium tetraborate; 25 mg/kg).
`The animal was placed on an electrically heated pad
`and the hotly temperature was controlled by a feedback
`loop from a thermometer in the anus. Additional doses of
`or-chloralosc were given (l76—3l2 ul/kg per h) when
`required to maintain anaesthesia.
`In order to maintain
`homeostasis, a Ringer solution was administered (2.2-7.8
`tnl/kg per h).
`
`'
`22.2 Surgery
`The animal was tracheotomised and a glass respiratory
`cannula was inserted and connected to a volumetric low-
`
`pressure transducer (Grass PTSA) for recording of respira-
`tory volumc. Both femoral arteries were cathctcriscd with
`polyethylene tubing (PE90). One of these was Connected to
`a blood pressure transducer (Statham P23DC). The other
`was used for intra-arterial (t.a.) administration of acetyl-
`cholinc and collection of blood samples for determination
`of haematocrit and blood gases. The right femoral vein
`was calheterised (PE90) and cotmcetcd to a 3-way stop-
`cock for i.v. infusion of test compounds and Ringer solu-
`tion.
`
`The hypogastric and pelvic nerves were identified and
`transected. The ureters were cut. and cathctcrised (PE10).
`A catheter (PE240) inserted into the urinary bladder through
`an incision in the proximal urethra. At the beginning of the
`experiment, this catheter was connected to an open vessel
`filled with temperature-controlled (37°C) saline that was
`placed approximately 15 cm above the animal. During
`stabilisation (about I h), the bladder relaxed and gradually
`became filled with saline under constant hydrostatic pres-
`sure. The bladder catheter was later connected to a pres-
`sure transducer (Statham p23A) for recording of intravcsi-
`cal pressure. The duct of the submandibular gland was
`exposed in the neck and catheteriscd (PEll)). The parasym-
`pathetic ehorda-lingual nerve was exposed and cut as
`proximally as possible. The peripheral nerve stump was
`placed on a bipolar electrode. lntravesical pressure, blood
`pressure, heart rate (derived from the blood pressure sig-
`
`'Patent"0wner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2032 - 0005
`
`

`
`L.
`
`."l«'i'It'ehran! at at’ /' European Jourrio! afPFmrrnocoi'ogy 327 (I99?) I95—.?fl7
`
`I99
`
`ride, plttznylmelhylsiilphonyl fluoride, oxybutynin hydro-
`chloride and atropine sulphate (Sigma, USA}; []Hl( —)-1-
`quinuclidinyl benzilate. 32-52 Ci/mmol (equivalent
`to
`l.l8--1.94 TBq/Inrnol} (fiiniersham, UK or Du Pont NEN,
`USA); pentobarbital sodium (Apotel-tsbolaget, Sweden);
`oi-chloralosc (Merck. Germany); sodium boratc (Mallinl<-
`rodt, USA); DMEM and I-lAM's I-"I2 (National Veterinary
`Institute, Sweden); foetal bovine serum albumin (HyClorie
`Lab, USA); L-gltitamine and penicillin/streptomycin (ICN
`Biomedicals. USA). Other chemicals used (analytical
`grade) were purchased from general commercial sources.
`The radioligand [JH]( - )-l-quinuelidinyl benzilate was
`diluted in absolute ethanol. Stock solutions of tolterodine.
`oxybutyniri, atropine and carbzichol for functional in vitro
`studies were prepared and diluted in redistilled water.
`Stock solutions of tolterodine, oxybutynin. atropine and
`acctylcholine for in vivo studies were prepared and diluted
`in saline. Fresh solutions were prepared for each experi-
`merit.
`
`3. Results
`
`3. I. In uilro .rt‘udie.s
`
`3.1.}. Funcrionai .S!udt€.t‘ on isolated urinmfv bladder
`Tolterodine effectively inhibited earbaehol-induced con-
`tractions of guinea-pig isolated urinary bladder strips in a
`concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2). The Schild plot
`(not shown) was linear (slope 0.97; pA2 8.6), indicating a
`simple competitive blockade oi‘
`the bladder muscarinic
`receptors. Similar data were obtained for oxybutynin
`{Schild slope 0.89; pA2 8.5). Tolterodine was thus equipo-
`tent to oxybutynin, but less potent than atropine (Table l).
`
`100
`
`8°
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`B
`
`7
`
`4
`5
`5
`—l_og lcarbacnoll (M)
`
`3
`
`2
`
`)1
`E
`E
`.5
`$’
`3
`
`E 8$
`
`(1;
`
`rial) and respiration rate were recorded on a Polygraph
`(Grass mode! 7D). Blood pressure, heart rate, respiration,
`blood gases and haernatocrit were measured In order to
`monitor the general condition of the animal during the
`course of the experiment.
`
`2.2.3 Expe'r'i'nierm7I' procedure
`receiving
`The
`cats were divided into four groups
`tolterodine (n = 5), oxybutynin (ii = 5). atropine (rt 7 5),
`or saline (H = 10; control group), respectively. Tolterodine
`(21-2103 nmol/kg (0.0l—l mg/kgl), oxybutynin (25-
`2538 nmol/kg (0.0l—l mg/kg)),
`atropine
`(0.864-lo
`nmol/kg (0.0(}03—0.03 mg/kg)) or saline were adminis-
`tered by i.v.
`infusion at a rate of l ml/kg per min. The
`animals were left to recover For at
`least 24 min between
`
`doses. Urinary bladder contractions were evoked by La.
`injection of a standard (submaximal) dose ol‘ acetylcholine
`(l-4 ug/kg), which produced a short-lasting (< I niin),
`large (> 9 cmll3O) and reproducible (< l5% variation}
`increase in intravesical pressure. This standard dose was
`selected from a dose-response curve to acetylcholine (0.5 -8
`pg/kg) generated at
`the beginning of each experiment.
`Aeetyleholine was administered before and approximately
`9 and H3 min after each dose ofantagonist. Salivation was
`induced by suprarnaitinial electrical stimulation (6 V, 2 ms.
`5 Hz) ofthe churda-lingual nerve. The frequency-response
`relationship was established at the beginning of each ex-
`periment using frequencies of 0.5,
`l, 2 and 5 H7. over 2
`min. The frequency used in the experiments (5 Hz) pro-
`duced a mean salivary secretion of 372 1 24 ul during 2
`min. Electrical stimulation of the ehorcla-liiiguzil nerve was
`perfonned before and approximately 7 min after each dose
`of antagonist. Arterial blood samples for determination of
`haematocrit and blood gases were drawn before the admin-
`istration of each dose of test compound.
`
`2.3. Cmculattoos and .YIt1'l.i.tflL’.§‘
`
`Effects of drugs on urinary bladder contractions and
`salivary secretion are expressed as percentage inhibition of
`the control responses. Data are presented as mean i S.E.M.
`of (ii) animals. Differences between the inhibitory effect
`exerted by the antagonist on urinary bladder contractions
`and salivary secretion were analysed for each dose level
`using a paired Student's :-test. Differences between the
`doses of antagonist causing a 50% inhibition of" these
`responses (lC_.,,) were also analysed. P values < 0.05
`were considered significant.
`
`2.4. Dmgs and L‘I1emiccii'.t'
`
`The following drugs and chemicals were used: to1tero-
`dine tartrate {tR)-N,N—diisopropyl-3-(2-hydroxy-5-rnetbyl-
`pheny1)-3-phenylpropanaminc hydrogen L-(+)-tartrate].
`saline and Ringer solution (Pharmaeia&Upjohn, Sweden);
`czirbamyleholine chloride (carbachol), acetylcholine chlo-
`
`2. Effect of Iolterodinc on the concentration-response curve to
`Fig.
`cart-mchol
`in guinea-pig isolated iiniiary bladder. The contractile rc-
`spnnses elicited by increasing concentrations of carbachol (cumulatn-e
`udditinns) were recorded in the absence (control) and presence, respec-
`tively, oftolterodine at concentrations of 10 nM (Y ). 30 nM ( 6) and 500
`nM (A). The time of incubation with toltcrodine was 60 min. Control
`data (0) represent the mean (iS.l’..M.) of I-1 individual experiments
`The I:IC5,, value for crirbachol was 2 4 :0 3 uM.
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2032 - 0006
`
`

`
`I
`Table:
`Aflinilics, expressed as the dissociation constants (R5,). for inuscurinic receptors in guzncmpig cerebral uorlcx. heart unil parnlid gland
`(.‘ompound
`Unnary bladder
`Cerebral cortex
`Hcari
`
`Tnl1cmdii1e
`Oxyburynin
`Almpini:
`
`K" EnM]
`3.0 i (1.2 (15)
`4.4-:0.6(l-4}
`0.7 i0.1 (10)
`
`Ki (nM)
`2.7-:02 ((-5
`4.0104(6)
`10:13.] (7)
`
`n"
`I .02 $0.03 (6)
`0.99iU.01{6}
`1.00 10.02 (7)
`
`KI (nM)
`0,75 1 ().(!l (S)
`0.4-E 1005(5)
`0.32:0.02 (4)
`
`:1”
`J 05 ;|;0.U3 {5}
`09'-'-:00!
`{5}
`1,0o:0,oo3 (4)
`
`K‘ (nMJ
`l.6 i 0.04 (5)
`2.3tU.3 (5)
`0.891-0.06 (3)
`
`H"
`1.04 _-1 0.06 (5)
`I 05 1:01)} {5}
`1.05 10.00 (3)
`
`l’ar(md gland
`
`K; (nM)
`(5)
`4.8 -_I_ 0.3
`0.62:0.05(6)
`0.35 30.05 (9)
`
`:1”
`L04 ; 0.03 (5)
`l.U| :0.03 (6)
`0.95 10.01 (9)
`
`Daia on urinary bladder muscarinic recepmrs were derived from functional in vitm studies (K,,) on carhachol-induced contractions of bladder strips and from competition binding studies (K_) in bladder
`homogenates. rcspcciivcly. K. values were derived from competition binding experiments with [‘H]( - l-I-quinuclidinyl henzilaic, as described in Section 2.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket