throbber
UROLOGY
`
`VOLUME 51, NUMBER 2A
`
`SUPPLEMENT TO FEBRUARY 1993
`
`URINARY INCONTINENCE:
`THE SCOPE OF THE PROBLEM—THE SOLUTIONS ON THE HORIZON
`Guest Editor‘ ALAN], WEIN, M_D.
`
`Introduction: Urinary Incontinence;
`The Scope of the Problern—.The Solutions on the Horizon
`
`Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Evaluation ofUrinary Incontinence and
`Overactive Bladder
`
`Outcome Measures for Urinary Incontinence
`
`Special Considerations in Elderly Individuals With Urinary Incontinence
`
`Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment oi Urinary Incontinence
`
`Surgery for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder
`
`Behavioral Intervention for Comrnunity—Dwellin_g Individuals With Urinary Incontinence
`
`Biofeedback for Communiry—Dwelling Individuals With Urinary Incontinence
`
`Behavioral Modification for Institutionalized Individuals With Urinary Incontinence
`
`Phannacologic Options for the Overactive Bladder
`
`UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIF.
`
`FEB 2 7 1998
`
`NORRIS MEDICAL LIBRARY
`
`ELSEVIER
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2031 - 0001
`
`

`
`
`
`s...-
`
`
`SEIR
`
`PHARMACOLOGIC OPTIONS FOR THE
`OVERACTIVE BLADDER
`
`ALAN_].WElN
`
`1__:____:__
`
`ABSTRACT
`Objectives. To review the current pharmacoiogic options for treatment of the overactive bladder and to
`describe potential therapies on the horizon.
`Methods. The literature on the clinical efficacy and safety of the currently available agents is described.
`Results. According to the guidelines issued by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research [AHCPR),
`anticholinergic agents should be the first~line pharmacologic therapy for patients with detrusor instability.
`Oxybutynin is the anticholinergic of choice for this indication, whereas propantheline is the second-line
`therapy. Although calcium antagonists have been investigated,
`the one such drug introduced for the
`treatment of overactive bladder [terodiline] was withdrawn from the market because of a risk of cardiac
`arrhythmia. Studies of potassium channel openers have found either a lack of clinical efficacy or an
`unacceptable level of side effects. Alpha—adrenergic antagonists may be useful for decreasing bladder
`overactivity in patients who have autonomous bladders as the result of conditions such as spinal cord injury.
`Tricyclic antidepressants (particularly irnipramine) may be effective in decreasing bladder contractiiity,
`although the AHCPR guidelines caution that these drugs should be reserved for use in carefully evaluated
`patients. Future developments in the treatment of detrusor overactivity are likely to occur in 3 categories:
`drugs that affect peripheral excitatory mechanisms, drugs that inhibit afferent mechanisms, and drugs that
`affect more central actions at either the ganglionic. spinal cord, or supraspinal level.
`Conclusions. Although pharmacoiogic management of the overactive bladder has progressed little in the
`past 10 years, the future may hoid the promise of more effective therapies. UROLOGY 51 (Suppl 2A]:
`43-47, I998. © 1998, Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
`
`
`D espite disagreements regarding the details of
`neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and
`neuromorphology, all observers would agree that
`bladder filling and urine storage require the follow-
`ing: 1) accommodation of increasing volumes of
`urine at a low intrav esical pressure and with appro~
`priate sensation; 2) a bladder outlet that is closed at
`rest and remains so during increases in intra-ab-
`dominal pressure; and 3) an absence ofinvoluntary
`bladder contractions.‘ All
`types of therapy for
`urine storage disorders, whether neuropathic or
`nonneuropathic in etiology, can be classified
`within a functional scheme derived from this sim~
`ple concept. Therapy to improve urine storage may
`be directed toward inhibiting bladder contractility,
`
`_jm.j__.
`
`From the Division afUrolog_y, University 0fPcnns_ylvam'a Medi-
`cal Center, Philadclpliia, Pcnnsylvcmia
`Reprint requests.‘ Alan]. Wcin, MD, Division of Urology, Uni-
`versity of Penns_ylvanin Medical Ct’.iIl(’I', First Floor, Rhodes Pa-
`vilion, .3400 Spruce Street, Pliilaclclpliici, PA l9l04
`
`© 1998, ELHEVIER Scitirtct INC.
`ALL i't[GHl'5 i2i:.~Ei2vi;o
`h._
`
`decreasing sensory (afferent) input, or increasing
`bladder capacity.
`
`ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENTS
`
`Most of the neurohumoral stimulus for bladder
`contraction consists
`of
`acetylcholine-induced
`stimulation of postganglionic parasympathetic
`cholinergic receptors on bladder smooth muscle.
`Atropine and atropine-like anticholinergic agents
`inhibit the binding of acetylcholine to the cholin-
`ergic receptor,
`thereby suppressing involuntary
`bladder contractions of any etiology?-3 These
`drugs increase the volume of the first involuntary
`bladder contraction, decrease the amplitude of the
`involuntary bladder contraction, and may increase
`total bladder capacity.” However,
`involuntary
`contractions are not entirely inhibited. in several
`animal models, atropine only partially antagonizes
`the response of the whole bladder to pelvic nerve
`stimulation and the response of bladder muscle
`strips to field stimulation. This so-called atropine
`
`0090:4195/98.’$19 00
`PllSUG90—-1295(98)OOtl45—4 43
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2031 - 0002
`
`

`
`
`
`to the cholinergic receptor in the smooth muscle
`cell membrane. However, they all have an atro-
`pine~lil<e effect, and questions remain regarding
`the degree to which the clinical, as opposed to the
`laboratory, efficacy of these drugs is attributable to
`this atropine-like effect. Most have some in vltro
`local anesthetic properties as well.
`Oxybutynin is a moderately potent anticholin.
`ergic agent that has strong, independent muscular
`tropic relaxant activity and local anesthetic activ-
`ity. The 1996 AHCPR guidelines
`state that
`oxybutynin is the anticholinergic of choice when
`pharrnacologic therapy is to be used for patients
`with detrusor instability? The recommended oral
`adult dosage is 2.5 to 5 mg 3 or 4 times daily.
`Several studies have found this drug to be effective
`in the management of various types of bladder
`overactivity.7r‘° For example,
`in a randomized,
`double-blind, placebo—controlled trial. Moisey er
`al. found that 17 of 23 patients with detrusor insta-
`bility experienced symptomatic improvement with
`5 mg oxybutynin 3 times daily and 9 had evidence
`of urodynamic improvement
`(primarily an in-
`crease in maximal bladder capacity) .7 Thiiroff et al.
`compared oxybutynin, propantheline, and placebo
`in patients with symptoms of instability and either
`detrusor instability or hyperreflexiaw Oxybutynin
`(5 mg 3 times daily) was most effective, although
`propanthcline was used at a relatively low dose of
`15 mg 3 times daily. The authors pointed out that
`their 67% rate of good or excellent results with
`oxybutynin compared favorably with the 61% to
`86% range calculated from other studies. The po-
`tential side effects are antimuscarinic in nature and
`cause a considerable number of patients to discon-
`tinue this medication.
`Flavoxate is another drug that has a direct inliib-
`itory action on smooth muscle, as well as having
`anticholinergic and local analgesic effects.” How-
`ever, this agent has questionable clinical efficacy
`and is not recommended for the treatment of de-
`trusor instability, according to the AHCPR guide-
`lines.“
`
`CALCIUM ANTAGONISTS
`
`resistance may be caused by the release of a non-
`cholinergic excitatory neurotransmitter.3 The exis-
`tence of atropine resistance in normal human blad-
`der muscle has not been confirmed and may exist
`only in abnormal states. This hypothesis may ex-
`plain why it is difficult to abolish involuntary blad-
`der contractions with anticholinergic therapy
`alone. Anticholinergic agents do not increase the
`warning time (the time between the perception
`that an involuntary contraction is about to occur
`and its actual occurrence). Therefore, urgency and
`incontinence will continue to occur unless such
`treatment is used in combination with a timed
`voiding or toileting regimen.
`According to the 1996 practice guidelines issued
`by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
`(AHCPR), anticholinergic agents should be con-
`sidered first-line pharmacologic therapy for pa-
`tients with detrusor instability.“ Propantheline
`bromide is the traditional oral agent used to pro-
`duce an antimuscarinic effect in the lower urinary
`tract (LUT). The AHCPR guidelines state that pro-
`pantheline should be the second-line anticliolin-
`ergic agent for the treatment of detrusor instability
`in patients who can tolerate the full dosage (the
`first-line agent being oxybutynin, as discussed un-
`der musculotropic relaxants below). The recom-
`mended dosage of propantheline is 7.5 to 30 mg
`administered 3 to 5 times per day, although higher
`dosages (15 to 60 mg 4 times daily) may be re-
`quired. There appear to be few differences between
`the antimuscarinic effects of propantheline on
`bladder smooth muscle and those of other anti-
`muscarinic agents (for instance, glycopyrrolate,
`isopropamide, hyoscyamine, anisotropine, and
`methylbromide).
`The ideal anticholinergic agent would be one
`that inhibits only the muscarinic receptor subtype
`responsible for bladder contraction. However,
`it
`has been very difficult, either experimentally or
`clinically, to identify a compound that would affect
`only bladder contractility and not the salivary se-
`cretory glands. All antimuscarinic agents have the
`potential to inhibit salivary secretion (causing dry
`mouth), block the ciliary muscle of the lens to cho-
`linergic stimulation (causing blurred vision for
`nearby objects), and cause tachycardia, drowsi-
`ness, and inhibition of gut motility. Drugs that
`have some ganglionic blocking activity may also
`cause orthostatic hypotension and, at high doses,
`impotence.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The dependence of contractile activity on
`changes in cytosolic calcium varies from tissue to
`tissue, as do the characteristics of the calcium
`channels involved. Nonetheless, interference with
`the inflow or intracellular release of calcium is ‘A
`mechanism by which bladder smooth muscle re-
`laxation may be achieved.” An agent that com-
`bines calcium antagonistic activity with anticho-
`linergic activity may therefore offer
`improved
`clinical efficacy. The calcium antagonist terodiline
`was found effective in several clinical studies coir
`ducted during the 19803 and early l99OS.”“j
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UROLOGY 51 (Supplement 2A}, Febrticiiy I998
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MUSCULOTROPIC RELAXANTS
`
`Agents classified as musculotropic relaxants or
`antispasmodics are all said to have an inhibitory
`effect on bladder smooth muscle contraction met-
`abolically distal to the attachment of acetylcholine
`
`44
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2031 - 0003
`
`
`
`

`
`However, this agent was withdrawn from the mar-
`ket following reports of the potential for cardiac
`arrhythmia (specifically, torsade de pointes).”"”
`
`POTASSIUM CHANNEL OPENERS
`
`Potassium channel openers relax various types of
`smooth muscle by increasing potassium efflux and
`causing membrane hyperpolarization.” Such
`agents also abolish spontaneous contractile activ-
`ity in normal and hypertrophied preparations and
`will inhibit contractions caused by carbachol (an
`acetylcholine agonist) and electrical sti1nulation.l“’
`Theoretically, a potassium channel opener would
`have the advantage of not affecting the contractile
`power of a normal micturition. However, assess-
`ments of these agents have found a lack of clinical
`efficacy or an unacceptable level of side effects.1°~31
`
`ALPHA-ADRENERGIC ANTAGONISTS
`
`Alpha—adrenergic antagonists have been used to
`decrease bladder overactivity with some success in
`patients who have so-called decentralized or au-
`tonomous bladders as the result of myelodysplasia,
`spinal cord injury, or radical pelvic surgery.“
`
`TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANTS
`
`The tricyclic antidepressants are a complex
`group of drugs that have central and peripheral
`anticholinergic effects, as well as sedative effects,
`and block the active reuptake of norepinephrine
`and serotonin. However, the exact mechanisms by
`which these drugs act in the LUT remain a matter
`of debate.
`
`The 1996 AHCPR guidelines caution that tricy-
`clic antidepressants should be reserved for use in
`carefully evaluated patients.“ The guidelines state
`that the usual oral dosage ofimipramine is 10 to 25
`mg initially administered 1 to 3 times per day, but
`less-frequent adtninistration is often possible be.-
`cause ofthe long half-lives of these drugs. The total
`daily dosage is typically 25 to 100 mg.
`ltnipramine, in particular, is useful for facilitat-
`ing urine storage by decreasing bladder contractil-
`ity and increasing outlet resistance.23"37 In a study
`by Castelden et al., elderly patients with detrusor
`instability began therapy with a single 25 mg night-
`time dose of imipramine." The dose was increased
`by 25 mg every third day until the patient either
`achieved continence, experienced side effects, or
`reached a dose of 150 mg. Of 10 patients, 6 became
`continent. Among those who underwent repeat
`cystometry, bladder capacity increased by a mean
`of 105 mL, bladder pressure at capacity decreased
`by a mean of 18 cm H20, and maximum urethral
`pressure increased by a mean of 30 cm H20. In our
`experience, imipramine and atropine—like agents
`
`UROLOGY 51 (Supplcincnt ZA), February 1998
`
`often have additive effects on the LUT. Therefore, a
`
`combination of imipramine and an antiinuscarinic
`or antispasrriodic drug may be useful for decreas-
`ing bladder contractility. However, the side effects
`may be additive as well.
`Doxepin is another tricyclic antidepressant that
`has been evaluated for the treatment of U1. In a
`randomized, double—blind, cross-over study by
`Lose et al, women with involuntary bladder con-
`tractions and either frequency, urgency, or urge Ul
`received either a single 50 mg dose of doxepin at
`bedtime or this dose plus an additional 25 mg in
`the 1norning.33 Doxepin produced a significant de-
`crease in nighttime frequency and nighttime in-
`continence episodes. This treatment also resulted
`in a nearly statistically significant decrease in urine
`loss and in cystometric measurements of first sen-
`sation and maximum bladder capacity.
`If a tricyclic antidepressant is prescribed for the
`treatment of voiding dysfunction, the patient must
`be informed that this is not the usual indication for
`the drug and that side effects may occur. At the
`generally larger doses used to achieve antidepres-
`sant effects, the most frequent side effects of the
`tricyclic antidepressants are those attributable to
`the systemic anticholinergic activity of
`these
`drugs.2‘-W’ Central nervous system (CNS) side ef-
`fects and postural hypotension may also occur.
`Imipramine is contraindicated in patients receiv-
`ing monoainine oxidase inhibitors because severe
`CNS toxicity may develop.
`In addition,
`these
`agents can produce arrhythmias and should there-
`fore be used with caution in patients with cardio-
`vascular disorders?“ Side effects such as weakness,
`fatigue, and orthostatic hypotension may be espe-
`cially marked in elderly patients.
`
`PROSTAGLANDIN INHIBITORS AND
`BETA-ADRENERGIC AGONISTS
`
`Some laboratory evidence is available to suggest
`that prostaglandin inhibitors or beta—adrenergie
`agonists should be effective in decreasing bladder
`contractility. However, these lines of investigation
`have not proved fruitful in the clinical setting.
`
`FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
`
`Future developments in the treatment of detru-
`sor overactivity are apt to occur in 3 categories.
`The first category consists of drugs that affect pe-
`ripheral excitatory mechanisms. Such therapies
`could take the form of more specific receptor an-
`tagonists, drugs that affect membrane phenomena,
`or drugs that affect excitation contraction cou-
`pling. The second category includes drugs that in-
`hibit afferent (sensory) mechanisms. The third cat-
`egory consists of drugs that affect more central
`
`45
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2031 - 0004
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`..__g___......._w..._,«.__......_._._..._._..._._.._.'
`
`actions at either the ganglionic, spinal cord, or su-
`praspinal level.
`At the 1997 meeting of the American Urological
`Association, the category of agents that affect affer-
`ent mechanisms was the most commonly men-
`tioned of the newer treatment strategies. A total of
`9 abstracts were presented on capsaicin, an irritant
`and algogenic compound obtained from hot red
`peppers.-3‘-3° One abstract dealt with a new potas-
`sium channel opener (YM-934),“° and one with a
`phosphodiesterase-1
`inhibitor
`(vinpocetine}.“
`Two abstracts described work with tolterotline, a
`selective muscarinic antagonist that has less of an
`effect on salivary gland smooth muscle than on
`detrusor smooth 11’1LlSClE.“l1:'l3
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`At present, anticholinergic agents remain the
`most common pharmacologic therapy for the over-
`active bladder. According to the AHCPR guide-
`lines, oxybutynin is the anticholinergic of first
`choice, followed by propantheline. Alpha-adrener-
`gic antagonists may be useful for the treatment of
`patients with decentralized bladders. The AHCPR
`advises that
`tricyclic antidepressants should be
`used only in carefully evaluated patients. lmipra-
`mine, in particular, can help decrease bladder con-
`tractility.
`Although the pharmacologic management of
`overactive bladder has progressed little in the past
`10 years, the future may hold the promise of more
`effective therapies. Among the promising treat-
`ments on the horizon are agents designed to affect
`peripheral excitatory mechanisms, inhibit afferent
`mechanisms, or affect more central actions at ei-
`ther the ganglionic, spinal cord, or supraspinal
`level.
`
`REFERENCES
`
`1. Wcin A], Levin RM, and Barrett DM. Voiding Function:
`Relevant Anatomy. Physiology and Pharmacology, in Gillen-
`waier JY, Grayhack JT, Howards ST, and Ducltett JW: Adult
`and Pediatric Urology, ed 2. St. Louis, Mosby, 1991. pp 933-
`1000.
`2. Andersson K~E: Current concepts in the treatment of
`disorders of micturition. Drugs 3-1-: 477-494, 1.988.
`3. Antlersson K-E; Pharmacology of lower urinary tract
`smooth muscles and penile erectile tissues. Pharmacol Rev 43:
`253-308, 1988.
`4-. Jensen Djr: Pharmacological studies of the uninhibited
`rieurogenic bladder. 11. The influence of cholinergic excitatory
`and inhibitory drugs oti the cystometrogram of neurological
`patients with normal and uninhibited neurogeriic bladder.
`Acta Neurol Scand 64-: 175-195, 1981.
`S, Jensen D Jr; Uninhibited neurogenic bladder treated
`with prazosin. Scartdj Urol1\lephrol 15: 229-233, 1981.
`6. Urinary lncontinence in Adults Guideline Update
`Panel: Urinctr_v lncontineiice in Adults: Acute cindC11ranic Man-
`agement, Clinical Practice Guideline, #2, I996 Updtitc. Rock-
`ville, MD, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Public
`
`46
`
`Health Service, US Department ofl-lealtli and Human Services
`‘
`1996. AHCPR Publication No. 96-0681.
`7, Moisey C, Stephenson T, and Brendler C: The urotly—
`namic and subjective results of treatment of detrusor instabil.
`ity with oxybutynin chloride. Br] Urol 52; 472-475, 1980,
`8. 1-lehir M, and FitzpatrickjM: Oxybutynin and the ]]]'Q_
`vention of urinary incontinence in spina bifida. Eur Urol 11:
`254--256, 1985.
`9. Gajewski 113, and Awad JA: Oxybutyniri versus propan.
`theline in patients with multiple sclerosis and detrusor liypgr.
`rellexiaj Urol 135: 966-968, 1986.
`10. Thuroff], Burke B, Ebner A, Faber P, deGeeter P, Han.
`nappel], l-{eidler H, Madersbacher H, Melchior H, and Schai.
`fer W, ct ct1.; Randomized double-blind multicentre trial on
`treatment of frequency. urgency and incontinence related to
`detrusor hyperactivity: oxybutynin vs propantheline vs pig.
`cebo.]Urol145'.813—816, 1991.
`11. Jonas U, Petri E, and Kissaljz The effect of flavoxate on
`hyperactive detrusor muscle, Eur Urol 5; 106-109, 1979.
`12. Levin RM, Hypolite J, Ruggieri MR, ct al.: Effects 0:
`muscarinic stimulation on intracellular calcium in the rzililnn
`bladder: comparison with metabolic response. Pharmacology
`39:69—77,1989.
`13. Malkowicz SB, Wein A], Brendler K, and Levin RM:
`Effect of diltiazem on in vitro rabbit bladder function. Phar-
`macology 31: 24-33, 1985.
`14. Peters D, and the Multicenter Study Group: Terodiline
`in the treatment of urinary frequency and motor urge incon-
`tinence: a controlled multicenier trial. Scand _] Urol Nephrol
`97(suppl): 21-25, 1984.
`15. Tapp A, Fall M, Norgaard], Massey A, Choa R, Carr T,
`Korhonen M, and Abrams P: Terodilirie: a close titrated, mul-
`ticenter study of the treatment of idiopathic detrusor instabil-
`ity in women. ] Urol 42: 1027-1031,1989.
`16. Connolly Mj, Astridge PS, White EG, Morley CA, and
`Cowan1C: Torsades dc pointes ventricular tachycardia and
`teroclilene. Lancet 338: 344-345, 1991.
`17. Stewart DA, Taylor], Ghosh S, Macphee GJA, Abdull-ah
`1, Mclenachan ]M, and Stott D]: Terodiline causes polymor-
`phic ventricular tachycardia due to reduced heart rate and
`prolongation of QT interval. Eur] Clin Pharmacol 42: 577-
`580, 1992.
`18. Andersson K-E, Andersson PO, Fovaeus M, Hcdluud
`M, Malgren A, and Sjogren C: Effects of pinaciclil on bladder
`muscle. Drugs 36(suppl 7}‘. 41-49, 1988.
`19. Fovaeus M, Andersson K—E, and 1-{edlund H: The action
`of pinacidil in the isolated human bladder. J Urol 141: 637-
`640, 1989.
`10. Hedluricl H, Mattiassnn A, and Andersson K-E: Lack of
`effect of pinacidil on detrusor instability in men with bladder
`outlet obstruction J Urol 143: 369A, 1990.
`21.. Nurse DE, Restorick _]M, and Mundy AR: The effect of
`cromakalim on the normal and liyperrellexic human detrusor
`muscle. Br] Urol 68: 27-31, 1991.
`22. Norlen L: Influence of the sympathetic nervous system
`on the lower urinary tract and its clinical implications. Neur-
`ourol Urodyn 1: 129-148, 1982.
`23. Cole A, and Fried F; Favorable experiences with imi-
`pramine in the treatment of neurogenic bladder. _] Urol 107‘.
`4-4--45, 1972.
`24. Mahony D, Laferte F, and M-ahoney J: Studies of enure-
`sis. V1. Observations on sphincter augmenting effect of mil-
`pramine in children with urinary incontinence. Urology 32
`317-323, 1973.
`25. Raezer DM, Benson GS, Wein A_], at al.: The functional
`approach to the management of the pediatric neuropatliik‘
`bladder: a clinical study.) Urol 117: 649-654, 1977.
`26. Tulloch AGS, and Creed KE; A comparison between
`
`UROLOGY 51 (Supplement 2A}, Felmictiy 1993
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2031 - 0005
`
`

`
`propanthcline and tmtprarrtine on bladder and salivary gland
`function. Br] Urol 51: 339 —362. 1979.
`27. Castleden CM, George CF, Renwick AG, and Asher M]:
`lmtpramine-ea possible alternative to current therapy for uri-
`nary incontinence in the elderly.] Urol 125: 318-320, 1981.
`28. L0seG,]0rgenst3t1 L, and Thunedborg P’ Doxepin in the
`treatment of female detrusor overactivity: a randomized dott—
`ble blind crossover study] Urol 142: 1024-1026, 1989.
`29. Baldessz1riniR_]: Drugs and the Trcattnent of ‘Psychiatric
`Disorders, in Gilmart AG. Rall TW, Nies AS, and Taylor P:
`Goodman and Gt’lmart’s The Pliatmmjologirctl B[l$lS of Tl1x’.’l'(l]J€'l!-
`tics, 8th ed. 1990, pp 383-435.
`30. Richelson E: Fhartnacology of ;intidepressants—clt-arac-
`tcristics of the ideal drug. Mayo Clin Prov: 69: 1069-1081, 1994.
`31. Cheng C-L, and dc Croat WC: Changes in the afl'err:r1t
`pathway lor the niicturition reflex after spinal cord injury in
`the cat (abst1,,] Urol 1570451280, 1997.
`32. Sed0t‘]F, ShL1pp—Byrnc D, MCCue P, Rivals DA, Chan-
`cellor MB, de GI'0:1t\lVC, Fraser MO.aI1cl]ordan ML: Effects of
`ethanol and oil vehicles for intravesical capsaicin treatment
`(absl)._l Urol 157(45): 81, 1997,
`33. Komiyama 1, lgawa Y, Nishizztwa O, ztnd Artclersson K—E:
`Effects ofin:ravestcal capsaicln and resinileratoxin on cl'1sten5ion—
`induced bladder cont.ract.ility in conscious rats with and withottt
`chronic spinal cord injury (ab5t).] Urol 157(45): 82, 1997.
`34, Nishizawa S, lgawa Y. Okada N, and Ohhasht T: Cap-
`saicin-inducecl nitric oxide—n'tediated relaxation in the dog
`urethra (abst).] Urol 157(45): 82, 1997,
`35, Lazzeri M, Benelorti P, and Turini D: Urodynamic ef-
`fects ol intravesical resiniferatoxirt in humans (ztbst).] Urol
`157(4-S1110‘?-.1997.
`36. Dasgupta P, Fowler C], Scaravtlli F, Penhenhy R, Shah
`
`], and Stephen FL; Capsaicin: from antiquity to urology tahst),
`J Urol 157(45): 151, 1997.
`37. Dasgupta P,Fow1cr C], Hoverd P, Haslarn C, Penberthy
`R, Shah], Stephen RL, Does electroirtotive drug administra-
`tion (EMDA) with lignocairte before intravestcal capsaictn
`conlcr benefit?(2tbst.)._)Urol157(4S): 186, 1997,
`38. Flood H, Shupp—Byrne D, Rivas DA, McCue P, Sedor],
`Crewalkj-A, Chancellor MB, de Groat WC, Fraser M0, Fag-
`erli ], rt al.: lrttravcsical capszticin for interstitial Cystitis (abst).
`] Urol157(4Sl:254,1997.
`39. Das A, Shupp-Byrne D, Rivas DA, Senior], Crewztlk]—A,
`Flood H,]ordan ML, de Groatt W'C, Fraser MO, Fager1i],e't ctI.:
`lntravesical capsaicin for neurogenic hlaclcler dysfunction
`(al:tst)._] Urol 157(45): 352, 1997.
`40. Takahaslii W, Yoshida M, Wada Y, Kitani K, Kikukawa
`H,1chinose A, lnadome A, Machicla], and Ueda S: The effect of
`potassiurrt channel opener YM934 on the contractile response
`in isolated 1'l‘El\'1'ta11 detrusor smooth muscle (abst). ] Urol
`157C451? 173,199?
`41. Truss MC, Stcif CG, Uckert 5, Becker A], Forssmartn
`W~G,atid]ot1as U: Initial clitiical experience with the selective
`phosphocliesterase (PDE)—1 isoertzyme inhibitor vinpocerine
`in the treatment of urge—tr1contincncc and low CD1Tlpl13.l1{.‘l3
`hlaclcler (2tbst).] Urol 157(45): 187, 1997.
`4-2. Gillberg PG, and Sundqtiist S: Pharniacological profile
`of DDO1 and desetliyloxybutynint the ‘‘major‘‘ tnetaholite ol
`tolterodine and oxybutynin (OB) respectively (abst). ] Urol
`157(45): 81, 1997,
`43. Abrams P, Freeman RN, Anderstrorn C, and Mattiasson
`A: Eflicztcy and tolcrability of tolterodine vs. oxybutynin and
`placeho in patients with detrusor instability (abet). Urol
`157(45): 103,1997.-
`
`UROLOGY 51 (5t.tpplt‘mt'nt ZA), Ft'lJt1tnry 1998
`
`47
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2031 - 0006

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket