throbber
CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`trospium chloride patients (after an average of
`
`14.3 days.)
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I do, yes.
`
`Are those -- are with —— is withdrawal an
`
`important consideration in whether or not an
`
`overactive bladder drug is efficacious?
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`A
`
`It doesn't have anything to do with
`
`efficaciousness, but it has to do with tolerability
`
`of the patient.
`
`So it's a very important issue.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`I should say -- yeah,
`
`I'm sorry,
`
`I should
`
`say effective, whether it's an effective OAB
`
`treatment?
`
`A
`
`Again, and it can be effective, but the
`
`patients can't tolerate it,
`
`so they stop taking it.
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Okay.
`
`And that's —— that's the case with
`
`oxybutynin.
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`Now,
`
`for most OAB patients that
`
`are put on —— on drugs, how long does it —— does it
`
`take for the patient to get the —— the desired
`
`effect from the drug?
`
`A
`
`It's extraordinarily variable.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0091
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`Okay.
`
`And it can be as quickly as a few days,
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`but most often it's several weeks before they have
`
`the maximum effect.
`
`One has to realize that when you do a
`
`study of any of the overactive bladder drugs,
`
`there's a significant placebo effect for many
`
`patients.
`
`As many as 30 percent of patients will
`
`have some placebo response.
`
`So you could give them
`
`a Vitamin B and about a third of them would feel
`
`better.
`
`So it's a little hard to tease that out.
`
`But —— but generally it takes several
`
`weeks for them to have a maximum effect.
`
`Q
`
`And an OAB drug is -- will only get
`
`approved if it shows an efficacy over placebo,
`
`though, right?
`
`A
`
`That's correct.
`
`MR. OELKE: Let's mark as 9, an article
`
`entitled Characterization of Darifenacin as a Novel
`
`Radioligand for the Study of Muscarinic M3
`
`Receptors by Carolyn Smith and Rob Wallis.
`
`(Deposition Exhibit 9 marked.)
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Thank you.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0092
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Have you seen Carson 9 before?
`
`I have not.
`
`Okay.
`
`Not that I know of.
`
`I mean, it's a long
`
`Q A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`time ago,
`
`so I may have but I don't think so.
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`So I don't think we need to spend
`
`too much time on it then.
`
`But you recognize it's an article
`
`concerning darifenacin?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And it's dated 1997?
`
`Correct.
`
`So at least as of 1997, darifenacin was
`
`being studied as a selective M3 inhibitor,
`
`right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And there were other compounds also being
`
`studied for selective M3 inhibition, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And why was selective M3 inhibition being
`
`studied as a —— as a possible lead for OAB drugs in
`
`the 1998-1999 time frame?
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`In the bladder,
`
`the predominant
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0093
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`muscarinic receptors are M2, which has the largest
`
`number. M3, second largest number. But M3 is the
`
`most functionally responsible receptor,
`
`so it's the
`
`one that you'd want
`
`to target.
`
`Unfortunately, M3 is also present in the
`
`salivary glands and in the gut.
`
`So even being
`
`selective doesn't necessarily eliminate all of
`
`those side effects.
`
`But if you could just target a clean drug
`
`that was only effective on M3,
`
`then you have a
`
`higher chance of affecting the overactive bladder
`
`with diminished side effects.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`And was darifenacin successful
`
`in
`
`reducing adverse side effects?
`
`A
`
`To an extent.
`
`The trouble with
`
`darifenacin is the bioavailability was variable.
`
`So at this —— you know,
`
`if it was really
`
`very well bioavailable, it would have changed
`
`the —— changed the landscape of overactive bladder
`
`treatment, but it just wasn't or isn't.
`
`Q
`
`So in 1998, would a reasonable path for
`
`research by GAB researchers to make a more
`
`bioavailable version of darifenacin?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0094
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`A
`
`Certainly would have been a thought.
`
`BY MR . OELKE :
`
`Q
`
`Okay. And it would have been a
`
`reasonable path, right?
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`BY MR . OELKE :
`
`Q
`
`And solifenacin, was it successful as a
`
`M3 selective inhibitor?
`
`A
`
`Also similar to darifenacin, selective,
`
`yes, but bioavailable not so much -- not as —- not
`
`as much as one would like.
`
`Q
`
`Okay. And is constipation a prominent
`
`side effect for those -- those two compounds?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`For many patients, yes.
`
`So would a reasonable approach have been
`
`to try to make a —— to start with darifenacin or
`
`solifenacin and make it —— make it compounded that
`
`had fewer side effects with respect to
`
`constipation?
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`A
`
`I mean,
`
`that would be a thought, but
`
`because there's M3 receptors in the bowel, it would
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0095
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`be a little hard to separate the bladder and the
`
`bowel and the three receptors.
`
`So if you're going
`
`to affect one, you're going to affect the other.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`But there's M3 receptors in salivary
`
`glands,
`
`too, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes, that's correct.
`
`Did darifenacin or solifenacin show a
`
`benefit with respect to dry mouth?
`
`A
`
`Well,
`
`they all had dry mouth and dry
`
`eyes, so,
`
`a benefit, no.
`
`A complication or a side
`
`effect, yes.
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`MR. OELKE:
`
`I would like to mark as
`
`Carson Exhibit 10, Abstracts of Paper —- well,
`
`it's —— I'll just give the Bates numbers,
`
`two
`
`pages. MYLB_FESO—OO27337 to 0338.
`
`(Deposition Exhibit 10 marked.)
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Thank you.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`This is an abstract from April of 1997.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`It was presented at the American Chemical
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0096
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`Society National Meeting?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Right.
`
`And if you look at the abstract that's
`
`046.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`It's entitled
`
`1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-2-isoquinolinecarboxylate
`
`derivatives.
`
`MR. OELKE:
`
`Sorry about that.
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`A Novel Class of Selective Muscarinic
`
`Antagonists.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`And the first named author is Takeuchi?
`
`Yes.
`
`And that's —-
`
`they were at Yamanouchi
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Pharmaceutical, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Right.
`
`And Yamanouchi is the company that
`
`developed solifenacin?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Uh—huh, yes.
`
`And do you understand this abstract
`
`concerns solifenacin?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0097
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`A
`
`No, but —— I don't know the chemical
`
`for solifenacin to be honest.
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`It's my understanding this is
`
`early abstract that concerns solifenacin.
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`Now,
`
`if you look in that —— in that
`
`paragraph in the abstract,
`
`five lines down, it
`
`says, Among those compounds, and then it lists
`
`same compound.
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`I won't —— I won't write it out, but
`
`a —-
`
`I won't read it out, but it's YM-53705 is
`
`shorthand for it.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`It said, It showed high affinity for
`
`receptor and a Ki value;
`
`is that right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`That's what it says.
`
`Of 12 nano —— of l2nm and 10-fold
`
`selectivity between rhythmic contraction and
`
`salivary secretion.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`So does this indicate that -- that M3
`
`selectivity is —— is between or at least they had
`
`tested it for between an effect on the bladder
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0098
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`and —— and the salivary?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Okay. And their conclusion is that
`
`YM—53705 will be expected as a drug for the
`
`treatment of urinary incontinence without side
`
`effects such as dry mouth.
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`It's kind of a hopeful statement there?
`
`Yes.
`
`Okay. But at least there —— there's an
`
`indication that the dry mouth would be less?
`
`A
`
`Would be less, right.
`
`MR. OELKE:
`
`I would like to mark as
`
`Carson 11 an article entitled Anti-muscarinic
`
`Potency and Bladder Selectivity of PNU—200577,
`
`a
`
`Major Metabolite of Tolterodine.
`
`(Deposition Exhibit 11 marked.)
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Thanks.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`Do you recognize Carson Exhibit 11 as an
`
`article by Dr. Nilvebrant and others?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Do you understand Dr. Nilvebrant was one
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0099
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`of the inventors of tolterodine?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Do you know Dr. Nilvebrant?
`
`I do not.
`
`Now, do you understand that PNU—200577 is
`
`another term that's used for 5—HMT?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Okay. And if you look at the abstract of
`
`this article,
`
`four lines up from the bottom, it
`
`says:
`
`Thus, PNU—200577 is similar to tolterodine
`
`in terms of anti—muscarinic potency, functional
`
`selectivity for the urinary bladder in vivo and
`
`absence of selectivity for muscarinic receptor
`
`subtypes in vitro.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`So the conclusion of Dr. Nilvebrant,
`
`based on these studies,
`
`is that tolterodine and --
`
`and 5—HMT are similar in terms of anti—muscarinic
`
`potency, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And —— and similar in their terms of
`
`their functional selectivity in vivo, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Now, Dr. Nilvebrant conducted studies
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0100
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`in cats, right?
`
`Yes.
`
`And some of that is discussed here?
`
`I
`
`think this was not cats,
`
`though.
`
`If you look at the in vivo results.
`
`It was guinea pigs as well, so...
`
`Q
`
`Right,
`
`there is in vitro studies in
`
`guinea pigs.
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yeah.
`
`But if you look on Page 170, it says,
`
`In
`
`Vivo Studies.
`
`It says:
`
`The anti—muscarinic
`
`effects of PNU-200577 in vivo were studied in the
`
`anesthetized --
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Oh, right.
`
`-- anesthetized cat. Right?
`
`Correct. Yeah.
`
`They also used bladder
`
`strips from the guinea pigs,
`
`so they did both --
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Right.
`
`—— both things,
`
`in vivo and in vitro.
`
`Are you familiar with these -- these
`
`anesthetized cat studies?
`
`A
`
`I'm familiar with them, I've never done
`
`Okay.
`
`If you look in the Discussion
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0101
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`section of this article on Page 171.
`
`It says:
`
`In the anesthetized -- did I
`
`say that right? —— cat, PNU—200577 produced a
`
`dose—dependent inhibition of acetylcholine—induced
`
`urinary bladder contraction and electrically
`
`stimulated salivation, and was almost three times
`
`more potent for inhibition of urinary bladder
`
`contractions compared with salivation. Right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`So these studies established or at least
`
`suggested that the tolterodine metabolite was more
`
`active in the bladder than in the salivary gland,
`
`right?
`
`A
`
`That's what ——
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`A
`
`That's what it's suggesting. Whether
`
`that translates into a clinical advantage or not
`
`I
`
`guess remains to be seen based on this.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`Right.
`
`It's not necessary that what's seen in
`
`cats is going to translate to humans,
`
`for instance?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Correct.
`
`Okay.
`
`If you look at the last paragraph
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0102
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`in this —— in this article, it says:
`
`In summary,
`
`the pharmacological
`
`in vitro and in vivo profiles
`
`of PNU—200577 are almost identical to those of
`
`tolterodine,
`
`the parent compound.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`So, again,
`
`this is supporting the concept
`
`that extensive metabolizers and poor metabolizers
`
`are going to end up getting the same net effect
`
`from the administration of tolterodine orally,
`
`right?
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`A
`
`I'm not sure that you can totally say
`
`that because, again, of the —— because of the
`
`protein binding issues.
`
`I
`
`think that —— that
`
`has -- certainly has an effect on the effect in --
`
`in patients and humans. But as far as in a
`
`laboratory setting,
`
`the two are equivalent.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`MR. OELKE:
`
`I would like to mark as
`
`Carson 12 an article entitled Influence of CYPZD6
`
`polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics and
`
`pharmacodynamics of tolterodine. First author
`
`Niclas Brynne.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0103
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`(Deposition Exhibit 12 marked.)
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Thank you.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`Have you seen the Brynne article before,
`
`Dr. Carson?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes,
`
`I have.
`
`The -- the objective of this study was to
`
`determine whether 2D6 is involved in the metabolism
`
`of tolterodine, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And also to investigate potential
`
`differences of tolterodine in 5—HMT between poor
`
`and extensive metabolizers, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Correct.
`
`And the conclusion of the study is that,
`
`if you look there in the abstract, it says:
`
`Tolterodine is extensively metabolized by -- by
`
`CYPZD6 with high specificity. Despite the effect
`
`on pharmacokinetics,
`
`the CYPZD6 polymorphism does
`
`not appear to be of great
`
`importance in the
`
`anti—muscarinic effect, probably because of the
`
`additive action of parent drug and the active
`
`metabolite. Right?
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0104
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`Q
`
`So the —— the authors of this article,
`
`including Niclas Brynne, was that tolterodine and
`
`5—HMT had an additive action, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And that poor metabolizers and extensive
`
`metabolizers receive the same net effect?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`In this study,
`
`that's correct.
`
`And this was a study that was specific to
`
`tolterodine, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes, it was.
`
`So the conclusion of both the Brynne
`
`article,
`
`the Nilvebrant —— so the conclusion of the
`
`Nilvebrant article which was Carson Exhibit 11 --
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Uh—huh.
`
`-- the Brynne article which is Carson
`
`Exhibit 12, and the label for Detrol, which is
`
`Carson Exhibit 7,
`
`is that the net activity for poor
`
`metabolizers and extensive metabolizers is the
`
`same, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Okay.
`
`MR. OELKE:
`
`I would like to mark as
`
`Carson Exhibit 13 a document entitled Tolterodine,
`
`A new muscarinic receptor antagonist,
`
`is
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0105
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`metabolized by cytochromes P450 2D6 and 3A in human
`
`liver microsomes, by Postlind and others.
`
`(Deposition Exhibit 13 marked.)
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Thank you.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`Q
`
`Have you seen Carson Exhibit 13?
`
`Yes,
`
`I have.
`
`And this is a study in human liver
`
`microsomes for tolterodine?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And the conclusion that's stated in the
`
`abstract is: We conclude from these studies --
`
`this is the last sentence —— We conclude from these
`
`studies that the formation of 5—HM —— and you
`
`understand that 5—HM,
`
`is 5-HMT, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`That
`
`the formation of 5—HM is —— is
`
`catalyzed by CYP2D6 and that the formation of
`
`N—dealkylated tolterodine is predominantly
`
`catalyzed by CYP3A isoenzymes in human liver
`
`microsomes. Right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Now,
`
`in your report, your opening report
`
`you cite to the Postlind article, right?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0106
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`I do, yes.
`
`If you look at Page 18.
`
`Okay.
`
`On Page 18 you cite to a paragraph that's
`
`A Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`on Page 292 of Postlind,
`
`so it's at the end.
`
`Now,
`
`the last paragraph of Postlind
`
`starts: Clinical studies have demonstrated that
`
`individuals with reduced CYP2D6—mediated metabolism
`
`represent a high—risk group in the population with
`
`a propensity to develop adverse drug effects.
`
`Right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And it cites to Smith 1986.
`
`And you state in your report that this
`
`paragraph,
`
`in Paragraph 63, you say: This
`
`information is important to a clinician because it
`
`helps to inform the risks associated with dosing
`
`tolterodine. Right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Now,
`
`this statement -- first of all,
`
`Postlind didn't study, did he,
`
`the net activity of
`
`tolterodine in 5—HMT, right,
`
`in humans?
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`Can you say that again?
`
`I'm not quite
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0107
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`sure about that.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`This Postlind article isn't --
`
`Yeah.
`
`—— about
`
`the activity of tolterodine in
`
`5—HMT in humans when it's dosed orally,
`
`is it?
`
`A
`
`No, it's not.
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`It's about liver microzymes, right?
`
`Right.
`
`Microsomes, sorry.
`
`And it does not have any conclusion in it
`
`about whether there are certain risks associated
`
`with poor metabolizers for the administration of
`
`tolterodine orally to patients, right?
`
`A
`
`Well,
`
`I mean, basically he does say in
`
`his discussion that, you know, clinical studies
`
`have demonstrated that individuals with reduced or
`
`poor metabolizers represent a high risk group in
`
`the —— in the population with a propensity to
`
`develop adverse drug effects.
`
`So he states that in
`
`his --
`
`Q
`
`Right.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0108
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`—— in his discussion, right.
`
`But that statement is citing to Smith in
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`l986, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Smith 1986 doesn't have anything to do
`
`with tolterodine, does it?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`But it has to do with cytochrome 2D6.
`
`Right.
`
`And that basically has something to do
`
`with tolterodine as well, right, so...
`
`Q
`
`But 1986, when Smith was written,
`
`tolterodine hadn't even been invented yet, right?
`
`A
`
`It hadn't, but cytochrome P450 2D6 had
`
`been identified and --
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Right.
`
`—— was being studied and had been
`
`Right.
`
`And Smith is talking about other drugs,
`
`not tolterodine, right?
`
`A
`
`That's correct. He's talking about other
`
`drugs, but he's talking about that enzyme system.
`
`Q
`
`Right. But we've also established that
`
`there were studies that were done specifically on
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0109
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`tolterodine, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Correct.
`
`And those studies, which we just looked
`
`at, Brynne, Nilvebrant and also it's in the label,
`
`they all come to the conclusion that the net effect
`
`is the same for poor metabolizers and extensive
`
`metabolizers, right?
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`So this concern that's discussed here in
`
`Smith was found not
`
`to be applicable to tolterodine
`
`and 5—HMT, right?
`
`A
`
`In the studies that are reported,
`
`that's
`
`correct,
`
`the ones we've talked about.
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`MR. OELKE: Let's take a break.
`
`VIDEO TECHNICIAN: Going off the record.
`
`(Recess taken 11:26 a.m.)
`
`VIDEO TECHNICIAN: Back on the record,
`
`ll:43.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`Now,
`
`in 1998-1999,
`
`there were no
`
`long—acting OAB drugs on the market, right?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0110
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`A
`
`That's correct,
`
`they were all multiple
`
`day dosing.
`
`Q
`
`Okay. And at some point once daily drugs
`
`did become available, right?
`
`Yes,
`
`they did.
`
`Okay. And when was that?
`
`Roughly 2001.
`
`Okay.
`
`A
`
`Q A
`
`Q
`
`MR. OELKE:
`
`I would like to mark as
`
`Exhibit 14 an article, Fesoterodine is an effective
`
`anti—muscarinic for patients with overactive
`
`bladder
`
`(OAB): Results of a Phase 2 Trial by Nitti,
`
`et al.
`
`(Deposition Exhibit 14 marked.)
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Thank you.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Have you seen this article, Dr. Carson?
`
`I have, yes.
`
`Okay. And this is a study of
`
`fesoterodine, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes, that's correct.
`
`And they tested 4,
`
`8 and 12 milligram
`
`doses of fesoterodine once daily?
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0111
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`Okay. And placebo, right?
`
`Yes.
`
`And if you look at the Concluding Message
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`which is on the second page: Determined that All
`
`3
`
`doses of fesoterodine led to significant and
`
`clinically relevant improvements from baseline in
`
`several parameters, e.g.,
`
`frequency, urge
`
`incontinence and voided volume per micturition.
`
`Right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Okay. And so do you recall when
`
`fesoterodine was first introduced into the market?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`I
`
`think it was in the 2004 range.
`
`Okay. And what would —— did you at that
`
`time prescribe fesoterodine to patients?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Okay. And what was your clinical
`
`experience with fesoterodine?
`
`A
`
`It was good.
`
`I had no —— you know,
`
`they
`
`all work some and they all have side effects in
`
`some and some patients respond better to one than
`
`another,
`
`so -- but generally it was good.
`
`Q
`
`Okay. And it's —— it's approved at
`
`4 milligrams and at
`
`8 milligrams, right?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0112
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`That's correct.
`
`Q
`
`Okay. And so were there some patients
`
`that you prescribed 8 milligrams of fesoterodine
`
`to?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And were some of those patients that you
`
`had tried dosing tolterodine?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Okay. And why did you switch those
`
`patients from tolterodine to fesoterodine?
`
`A
`
`Couple of reasons. No.
`
`l is, it's a
`
`newer drug,
`
`so you always want to try something
`
`different.
`
`No.
`
`2 thing is,
`
`is that there were
`
`purportedly fewer side effects.
`
`No.
`
`3 thing is,
`
`is that there are
`
`actually a couple of studies that looked at
`
`head—to—head experience between tolterodine max
`
`dose and fesoterodine max dose, and it showed that
`
`the maximum dose of fesoterodine was more
`
`effective.
`
`And finally,
`
`that, you know,
`
`there --
`
`there were, again, active marketing of the drug,
`
`so
`
`we wanted to try new things. And as an academic
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0113
`
`

`
`Page ll4
`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`urologist,
`
`I feel it's my responsibility or part of
`
`it to try the latest drugs.
`
`Q
`
`So these —— these head—to—head studies of
`
`8 milligrams of fesoterodine to 4 milligrams of
`
`tolterodine,
`
`those studies were of the —— the
`
`maximum dose approved for each of those drugs,
`
`right?
`
`A
`
`Maximum approved dose, yeah.
`
`I mean,
`
`whether you could actually compare the doses or not
`
`is a matter of dispute, but
`
`those are the
`
`maximum—approved doses.
`
`Just like when we talked about
`
`the
`
`oxybutynin study, it was the maximum approved doses
`
`of each of the —— each of the agents.
`
`Q
`
`So it's a very common thing when you're
`
`doing a head—to—head study to compare a
`
`maximum—approved dose of each drug?
`
`A
`
`In —— in —— in post marketing trials,
`
`it's almost always done that way.
`
`Q
`
`Okay. But going back to the Nitti
`
`article, his conclusion is that for all of these
`
`different doses, 4,
`
`8 and 12,
`
`they actually tested
`
`12 milligrams here as well,
`
`that they led to
`
`significant and clinically relevant improvements
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0114
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`for the parameters they tested which were
`
`frequency, urge incontinence and voided volume per
`
`micturition, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Okay. And those are all important
`
`parameters, correct?
`
`A
`
`That's what you're trying to really
`
`treat. That's what
`
`the patients are bothered by.
`
`Q
`
`Okay. And he also concluded that
`
`improvements were seen as early as two weeks after
`
`randomization.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Was that a benefit of fesoterodine that
`
`it showed early improvement?
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`A
`
`There are -- there are studies that show
`
`that it was quicker —— a quicker onset than some of
`
`the ones that were already on —— on the market,
`
`yes.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`All right. And that —— was that a
`
`surprising result for fesoterodine?
`
`A
`
`Not so much.
`
`I —— you know, it —— it was
`
`one of those things that most of the other drugs
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0115
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`didn't have those trials, rapidity of onset trials.
`
`So some of the —— some of the trials that
`
`are done are done for marketing purposes and that
`
`was a marketing trial in my opinion.
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`MR. OELKE:
`
`I would like to mark Carson
`
`Exhibit 15, an article entitled Role of
`
`Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism in Drug Discovery
`
`and Development by Lin and Lu, production numbers
`
`PFEO1847326 to 372.
`
`(Deposition Exhibit 15 marked.)
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Thanks.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Have you seen this article before?
`
`I have not.
`
`Okay.
`
`Not that I know of.
`
`Looks interesting,
`
`Q A Q
`
`A
`
`though.
`
`Q
`
`Just give me a second.
`
`If you look in your opening report of the
`
`materials considered.
`
`Okay.
`
`I
`
`think if you look at —— it's on --
`
`Got it, Exhibit 2.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0116
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`Q
`
`Table of exhibits.
`
`If you look at the
`
`table of exhibits at the front of the --
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yeah.
`
`The front.
`
`I guess I have seen this, yeah.
`
`Yeah,
`
`I
`
`think if you look at
`
`Paragraph 33, you cite to it.
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yeah, yeah,
`
`I did see this.
`
`Okay. And it's an article that discusses
`
`metabolism in drug development, right?
`
`A
`
`Yes.
`
`And drug discovery.
`
`And if you look at —— there's a section
`
`that starts at Page 436.
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`Which is PFEOl847359.
`
`Right.
`
`Q
`
`And that section's called
`
`Pharmacogenetics of Drug Metabolism.
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`If you look at the end of —— it gives a
`
`number of examples, but if you look at the end of
`
`that section on Page 439,
`
`the last paragraph.
`
`It
`
`says there:
`
`As described above, genetic
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0117
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`polymorphism in drug metabolism is undesirable and
`
`can at times be problematic.
`
`Excuse me.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`Yes.
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`What does polymorphism refer to there?
`
`Basically differences in the ability of a
`
`patient to metabolize drugs.
`
`The —-
`
`the high
`
`metabolizers of —— and —— and nonmetabolizers of
`
`D2 -— of 2D6 are examples of that polymorphism.
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Okay.
`
`Some patients do,
`
`some patients don't.
`
`It goes on to say: However, it should be
`
`emphasized that even if a large proportion of the
`
`metabolism of a compound is subject to genetic
`
`polymorphism,
`
`this should not influence its
`
`development as a drug.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`Careful evaluation of clinical relevance
`
`of polymorphic metabolism has to be taken into
`
`consideration in making the go/no—go decisions.
`
`Right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes, uh—huh.
`
`So with respect to tolterodine,
`
`that
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0118
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`careful evaluation of clinical relevance is
`
`described in -- in the Nilvebrant and Brynne
`
`article and the Detrol label, right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`It is, yes.
`
`They took a look at whether polymorphism
`
`was a problem for tolterodine, right?
`
`A
`
`They did.
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`And the conclusion that they drew was
`
`that the net activity for tolterodine and 5—HMT was
`
`the same, right?
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`A
`
`They showed there was an effect, but
`
`overall clinical effect was -- was minimal.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`Right.
`
`The overall difference in
`
`clinical effect --
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Exactly.
`
`-- was minimal,
`
`right?
`
`And so with respect to the example of
`
`tolterodine —— in fact,
`
`the genetic polymorphism
`
`turned out not
`
`to be undesirable with respect to
`
`tolterodine, right?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0119
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`A
`
`I wouldn't say that.
`
`I wouldn't make
`
`that strong a statement, but
`
`I would say that --
`
`that in a —-
`
`in a clinical experience it really
`
`didn't make a difference as far as the clinical
`
`outcomes are concerned.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`O
`
`Okay.
`
`You can set that aside.
`
`MR. OELKE:
`
`I
`
`think let's take a break
`
`It will be easier.
`
`VIDEO TECHNICIAN: Marks the end of Video
`
`Off the record,
`
`ll:57.
`
`(Lunch recess.)
`
`VIDEO TECHNICIAN: Marks the beginning of
`
`Video 3. Deposition Culley Carson, M.D. Back on
`
`the record.
`
`Time 12:52.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Good afternoon, Dr. Carson.
`
`Good afternoon.
`
`MR. OELKE:
`
`I would like to mark as
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0120
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`Carson Exhibit l6 an article entitled Superiority
`
`of Fesoterodine 8—milligram versus 4-milligram in
`
`reducing urgency urinary incontinence episodes in
`
`patients with overactive bladder: results of the
`
`randomized, double—blind, placebo—controlled EIGHT
`
`trial with Chapple, et al. as authors. Bates range
`
`is PFEOl843522 to 530.
`
`(Deposition Exhibit 16 marked.)
`
`THE WITNESS:
`
`Thanks .
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Have you seen Carson Exhibit 16 before?
`
`Yes,
`
`I have.
`
`And are you familiar with Chris Chapple?
`
`Yes, very familiar.
`
`I know him
`
`Q A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`personally.
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Okay. And is he a urologist?
`
`Yes, he is.
`
`Is he a well—respected urologist?
`
`Very much so.
`
`Okay. And this is a study concerning
`
`8 milligrams versus 4 milligrams of fesoterodine,
`
`right?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes, it is.
`
`And if you look at the conclusions, it
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0121
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`states there:
`
`In a 12-week,
`
`prospectively—designed, superiority trial,
`
`fesoterodine 8 milligrams showed statistically
`
`significantly superior efficacy versus fesoterodine
`
`4 milligram and placebo, as measured by reductions
`
`in UUI episodes and other diary variables,
`
`diary-dry dry rate, and improvements in measurement
`
`—— measures of symptoms -- symptom bother, HRQL,
`
`and other PROS.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`And it says: Clear evidence of
`
`dose—dependent efficacy is unique to fesoterodine
`
`among anti—muscarinics and other oral agents for
`
`treatment of OAB.
`
`Do you see that?
`
`A
`
`Q
`
`Yes.
`
`So is it your understanding that prior to
`
`this trial, no other OAB treatment had been shown
`
`to have dose dependent efficacy?
`
`A
`
`There were other trials that look at
`
`different doses and showed different outcomes,
`
`so
`
`—— but this showed a —— you know,
`
`if you raise it
`
`this much,
`
`then you raise the effects by the same
`
`amounts.
`
`Q
`
`Okay. And prior to this study,
`
`there had
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0122
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`never been a demonstration of such a dose—dependent
`
`efficacy relationship in a -- a designed --
`
`prospectively—designed trial, right?
`
`A
`
`Correct.
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`A
`
`Okay. This trial was designed to show
`
`that particular thing. Other trials were basically
`
`subgroup analyses and post hoc analyses of —— of
`
`other —— of larger trials.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`Are you aware of any other OAB drug that
`
`has shown dose—dependent efficacy effect?
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`A
`
`Well,
`
`they all do better at the higher
`
`dose than they do at the lower dose, and, you know,
`
`that's been demonstrated in a lot of studies.
`
`But as far as showing —— showing it as --
`
`as specifically as this,
`
`this is the only trial
`
`that I'm aware of that showed that re —— that
`
`result.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`Okay. Was that an important result for
`
`fesoterodine?
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0123
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`A
`
`I
`
`think it was —— yeah,
`
`I
`
`think it was
`
`important for the marketing of fesoterodine for
`
`sure.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`Well, was it important for —— not for the
`
`marketing of fesoterodine, but for —— in comparison
`
`to other OAB drugs, did it demonstrate something
`
`that was important to urologists?
`
`MS. WOOTEN: Objection,
`
`form.
`
`A
`
`That's a little hard to say because
`
`urologists always try to up dose patients if
`
`they're not responding well.
`
`And we know that for patients on
`
`fesoterodine, about 50 percent of them are up dosed
`
`anyway in a -- as a clinical -- as a -- as a
`
`clinical reality.
`
`And so at —— at the end of the day this
`
`showed what we all sort of already knew,
`
`I guess,
`
`is what I'm —— what I'm trying to get at.
`
`BY MR. OELKE:
`
`Q
`
`A
`
`Did you ever tell Dr. Chapple that?
`
`Not that specific thing.
`
`I mean,
`
`I know
`
`Chris Chapple extremely well, but
`
`I —— I'm not sure
`
`that we talked about this particular paper
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide
`
`877-702-9580
`
`Patent Owner, UCB Pharma GmbH — Exhibit 2026 - 0124
`
`

`
`CULLEY C. CARSON, III, M.D.
`
`together.
`
`Q
`
`Okay. Dr. Chapple certainly didn't
`
`indicate that this was just a confirmation of what
`
`was already known about OAB drugs,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket