throbber
DEFINITION/
`DEFINITION/
`BACKDROP
`BACKDROP
`
`Pharmaceuticals
`
`Urinary Incontinence
`
`New Therapies Expanding The Market
`
`Urinary incontinence (UI), the loss of bladder control or the
`leakage of urine, results from numerous causes, including
`
`pelvic muscle instability, pregnancy, surgery, urinary tract
`infections, and certain foods and medications.
` Urinary
`23% CGR 2003-08
`incontinence includes urge incontinence (characterized by a
`frequent desire to urinate) and stress incontinence (characterized by weak bladder
`muscles). Overactive bladder encompasses both increased urinary frequency and
`urge to urinate. More than 13MM Americans suffer from some form of urinary
`incontinence, and 18MM+ from overactive bladder. Pharmacologic therapies, pelvic
`muscle rehabilitation, and surgery are most frequently used to treat urinary
`incontinence and overactive bladder. Currently available pharmaceutical treatments
`address symptoms of urge incontinence but side effects are an issue. Stress and
`mixed incontinence account for over half of incontinence sufferers, providing a
`ready market for new therapies.
`
`Urinary Incontinence Category Market Share By $ Sales
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2003
`$1.3B
`WPI
`2%
`
`PARTICIPANTS
`
`JNJ
`29%
`
`2008P
`$3.9B
`
`Other
`9%
`
`WPI
`3%
`
`NVS
`10%
`
`JNJ
`14%
`
`PFE
`44%
`
`PFE
`69%
`
`LLY
`20%
`
`
`
`MAJOR TRENDS &
`ISSUES
`
`Pfizer’s Detrol/Detrol LA (tolterodine) franchise should continue to lead the
`overactive bladder/urge incontinence market through 2008, driven by the strong
`clinical profile of Detrol LA. J&J's Ditropan XL dollar share could decline given that
`newer therapies, including Watson Pharmaceuticals' Oxytrol, Indevus' Trospium,
`Novartis’ Enablex, and Yamanouchi/GlaxoSmithKline's Vesicare, may offer fewer side
`effects. Eli Lilly's Duloxetine, for stress and mixed urinary incontinence, should be a
`major force in this market.
`
`– The UI and overactive bladder patient populations are large, but difficult to
`penetrate given lack of effective therapies and embarrassment over the
`consequences of the ailments.
`
`– New drug therapies with improved side-effect profiles have brought many
`patients into the treatment stream. The move from generics to new treatments
`has "re -branded" the category.
`
` March 05, 2004
`
`
`
`519
`
`Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. - Exhibit 1059 - Page 1
`
`

`
`
`
`Pharmaceuticals
`
`– Branded products for urge incontinence and overactive bladder, led by Pfizer’s
`Detrol LA and JNJ’s Ditropan XL, appear comparable in terms of effectiveness and
`side effects. Oxytrol’s (Watson) improved side-effect profile and twice-weekly
`patch delivery system provide a differentiated alternative to oral anticholinergic
`therapies.
`
`Indevus’
`– Yamanouchi/GlaxoSmithKline's Vesicare, Novartis’ Enablex, and
`Trospium may improve upon the tolerability of current agents, although their
`mechanisms are similar. Head-to-head comparison studies will be required to
`claim superiority. Trospium appears most differentiated based on a lower CNS
`side-effect profile, but the current twice-daily dosing regimen will be a hurdle.
`
`– Eli Lilly's Duloxetine could double the potential market by targeting a new patient
`population of stress and mixed incontinence sufferers.
`
`– Our scatter plot shows that through 2008, Pfizer should dominate the
`incontinence market. Indevus should see the majority of its sales growth from
`this category.
`
`Urinary Incontinence
`
`IDEV
`
`WPI
`
`NVS
`
`JNJ
`
`GSK
`
`LLY
`
`PFE
`
`$0.20
`
`$0.40
`
`$1.40
`$1.20
`$1.00
`$0.80
`$0.60
`2008 Sales Contributed By Company To Category ($ In B)
`
`$1.60
`
`$1.80
`
`$2.00
`
`80%
`
`60%
`
`40%
`
`20%
`
`0%
`
`% Of Company 2003-08 Sales Growth From Category
`
`-20%
`$0.00
`
`520
`
` March 05, 2004
`
`Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. - Exhibit 1059 - Page 2
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`Pharmaceuticals
`
`ESTIMATED U.S. MARKET FOR URINARY INCONTINENCE (STRESS + URGE) DRUGS*
`
`2003
`
`2004E
`
`2005E
`
`2006E
`
`2007E
`
`2008E
`
`CGR
`
`Comment
`
`+3%
`
`- 18MM+ Americans with overactive bladder
`
`22,827
`+3%
`100%
`22,827
`+3%
`49%
`11,071
`54%
`6,016
`54%
`3,273
`14%
`33,848 +16% - Newer products for urge incontinence and
`+13%
` 2005 introduction of Duloxetine for SUI
`
`+3%
`
`- Includes portion of patients with mixed UI
`
`- Patients seeking treatment increase with better
` diagnosis, availability of newer treatments
`- Drug therapy market share expected to climb
` significantly with introduction of Duloxetine
`- Newer products with fewer side effects and longer
` duration and new products for stress incontinence
`
`+8%
`
`+13%
`
`+17%
`
`35%
`11,723
`$2.70
`$1,130 +16%
`24%
`8,239
`
`$2.70
`$800
`17%
`5,804
`$2.70
`$550
`4%
`1,389
`$2.40
`$110 +37%
`6%
`2,011
`$2.70
`$190
`
`NA
`
`+8%
`
`NA
`
`- Once-daily LA launched 1/01
`- Improved side-effect profile compared to Detrol
`
`- Eli Lilly expected to launch in Q1:2005
`- Stress urinary incontinence; first in class product
`
`-
`- New treatments with lower side effects clip
`- Launched 2/99 for overactive bladder
`
`- Oxybutynin patch; improved side-effect profile
`- Marketed by Women's Health, GP Division & CSO
`
`- Sold by Pfizer to Novartis in Q1:2003
`- NDA Q1:2003; H2:2004 launch assumed
`
`- Side-effect profile clips potential
`
`- NDA Filing 4/03; H2 2004E launch
` U.S. trials positive on side effects/efficacy
`
`U.S. Population/Prescriptions (000's)
`Overactive Bladder Sufferers
` % Growth
` % With Urge & Stress Symptoms
`Urge/Urge Predominant UI Sufferers
` % Growth
`% Incontinence Pts Seeking Treatment
` Incontinence Pts Seeking Treatment
`Drug Therapy Market Share
`Incontinence Pts Placed On Drug Tx
`Drug Therapy Retention Factor
`Incontinence Pts Compliant With Tx
`% Incontinence Pts Compliant With Tx
`Number of Scrips Filled/Year
` % Growth
`
`Detrol LA (PFE) Market Share
` Prescriptions (000's)
` Price Therapy/Day
`Detrol LA Sales ($MM)
`Duloxetine (LLY) Market Share
` Prescriptions (000's)
` Price Therapy/Day
`Duloxetine Sales ($MM)
`Ditropan XL (JNJ/AZA) Market Share
` Prescriptions (000's)
` Price Therapy/Day
`Ditropan XL Sales ($MM)
`Oxytrol (WPI) Market Share
` Prescriptions (000's)
` Price Therapy/Day
`Oxytrol Sales ($MM)
`Enablex (NVS) Market Share
` Prescriptions (000's)
` Price Therapy/Day
`Enablex Sales ($MM)
`
`19,634
`+3%
`100%
`19,634
`+3%
`38%
`7,366
`44%
`3,209
`47%
`1,504
`8%
`15,837
`+5%
`
`40%
`6,382
`$2.40
`$545
`
`20,262
`+3%
`100%
`20,262
`+3%
`38%
`7,695
`45%
`3,461
`50%
`1,741
`9%
`18,296
`+16%
`
`43%
`7,865
`$2.50
`$700
`
`28%
`4,512
`$2.40
`$379
`2%
`331
`$2.15
`$23
`
`28%
`5,185
`$2.50
`$455
`4%
`752
`$2.25
`$55
`2%
`353
`$2.50
`$30
`
`Trospium (IDEV) Market Share
` Prescriptions (000's)
` Price Therapy/Day
`Trospium Sales ($MM)
`Vesicare (YM-905) Market Share
` Prescriptions (000's)
` Price Therapy/Day
`Vesicare Sales ($MM)
`8%
`Detrol (PFE) Market Share
`1,199
` Prescriptions (000's)
`$2.40
` Price Therapy/Day
`$102
`Detrol Sales ($MM)
`14%
`Generic Oxybutynin Market Share
`2,161
` Prescriptions (000's)
`$28
`Oxybutynin Generics Sales ($MM)
`$18
`Other Therapies Sales ($MM)
`$1,095
`U.S. Incontinence Drug Sales ($MM)
`+17%
` % Growth
`Source: SG Cowen estimates, IMS Monthly Prescriptions.
`* Patient population and scrips in 000's; sales in $MM.
`
`1%
`125
`
`$2.50
`$10
`1%
`125
`$2.50
`$10
`5%
`907
`$2.50
`$80
`9%
`1,700
`$22
`$19
`$1,381
`+26%
`
`20,890
`+3%
`100%
`20,890
`+3%
`41%
`8,565
`48%
`4,090
`52%
`2,139
`10%
`22,318
`+22%
`
`41%
`9,117
`$2.55
`$830
`10%
`2,224
`
`$2.55
`$200
`24%
`5,363
`$2.55
`$480
`4%
`967
`$2.35
`$75
`4%
`784
`$2.55
`$70
`
`3%
`577
`
`$2.55
`$50
`3%
`577
`$2.55
`$50
`3%
`654
`$2.60
`$60
`6%
`1,400
`$18
`$10
`$1,843
`+33%
`
`21,517
`+3%
`100%
`21,517
`+3%
`44%
`9,454
`51%
`4,811
`52%
`2,514
`12%
`26,082
`+17%
`
`38%
`10,019
`$2.60
`$930
`16%
`4,253
`
`$2.60
`$400
`21%
`5,479
`$2.60
`$500
`4%
`1,136
`$2.40
`$90
`5%
`1,209
`$2.60
`$110
`
`3%
`879
`
`$2.60
`$80
`3%
`879
`$2.60
`$80
`2%
`405
`$2.80
`$40
`5%
`1,270
`$17
`$13
`$2,260
`+23%
`
`22,163
`+3%
`100%
`22,163
`+3%
`47%
`10,350
`53%
`5,461
`53%
`2,899
`13%
`30,023
`+15%
`
`36%
`10,887
`$2.65
`$1,030
`21%
`6,273
`
`$2.65
`$600
`19%
`5,644
`$2.65
`$525
`4%
`1,263
`$2.40
`$100
`5%
`1,617
`$2.65
`$150
`
`4%
`1,078
`
`$2.65
`$100
`4%
`1,078
`$2.65
`$100
`1%
`405
`$2.80
`$40
`4%
`1,225
`$16
`$14
`$2,675
`+18%
`
`522
`
`
` March 05, 2004
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`-17%
`
`- NDA Filing 12/02; H2:2004E launch
` GlaxoSmithKline co-marketing in U.S.
`
`- Continued conversion to LA
`
`- Price increases bolster switch to Detrol LA
`
`- Share decline with launch of new UUI therapies
`
`4%
`
`1,270
`$2.70
`$120
`4%
`1,270
`$2.70
`$120
`1%
`405
`$2.80
`$40
`4%
`1,225
`-11%
`$16
`-5% - Other generics (flavoxate, imipramine, etc.)
`$14
`$3,090 +23% - Improved treatments, better compliance
`+16%
` (Market sales include generics)
`
`Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. - Exhibit 1059 - Page 3
`
`

`
`
`
`Pharmaceuticals
`
`Detrol/LA and Ditropan XL Dominate The Treatment Market
`
`Both Detrol/LA and Ditropan XL are advances over prior therapy due to their
`reduced incidence of side effects (particularly dry mouth) and improved dosing
`regimen. Immediate-release oxybutynin generally is dosed at 2.5mg two or three
`times daily. At the 5mg dose, up to 70% of patients discontinue use of immediate-
`release oxybutynin within six months due to side effects, particularly dry mouth.
`Detrol is dosed at 2mg twice daily, with no titration. Detrol LA is dosed at 2-4mg
`once-daily and Ditropan XL is dosed at 5-30mg once daily, with the dose titrated to
`efficacy and patient tolerance. In the clinical studies published in the package
`inserts, Detrol and Detrol LA show superior tolerability to Ditropan XL, with dry
`mouth incidence reported at 39.5% for Detrol and 23.5% for Detrol LA, versus 60.8%
`for Ditropan XL. On the efficacy front, the drugs appear similar in their reduction
`(17-22%) of urinary frequency, although Ditropan XL may be superior in terms of
`reducing incontinence episodes. Detrol, Detrol LA and Ditropan XL garnered 80%+ of
`new prescriptions in the incontinence market in 2003.
`
`-
`
`Pfizer’s Detrol Franchise Holding Steady
`Detrol and Detrol LA have dominated
`the overactive bladder/urinary
`incontinence market. A wide-reaching patient and physician education program
`has increased treatment of incontinence and overactive bladder. Detrol is
`efficacious in reducing the number of micturitions and in increasing the volume
`voided per micturition, and Detrol LA has shown similar results with an
`improved dosing profile. The Detrol franchise continues to capture nearly 50%
`of new prescriptions, bolstered by once-daily Detrol LA. Detrol LA's NRx share
`decreased modestly to 41.0% in January 2004 from 41.5% in February 2003, and
`Detrol market share declined from 10.4% in February 2003 to 7.4% in January
`2004, trimmed by the launch of Watson’s Oxytrol. With Pfizer’s primary care
`reps currently promoting Detrol LA in the U.S., the Detrol franchise has
`maintained strong penetration of the general practitioner market. In January
`2004, nearly 54% of all Detrol LA prescriptions were written by general
`practitioners.
`
`Detrol LA Specialty Prescribers
`
`
`
`Jan-04
`
`Nov-03
`
`Sep-03
`
`Jul-03
`
`May-03
`
`Mar-03
`
`Jan-03
`
`Nov-02
`
`Sep-02
`
`Jul-02
`
`May-02
`
`Mar-02
`
`Jan-02
`
`Nov-01
`
`Sep-01
`
`Jul-01
`
`May-01
`
`Mar-01
`
`Jan-01
`
`UROLOGY
`
`GENERAL
`
`OB/GYN TOTAL
`
`OTHER
`
`250,000
`
`200,000
`
`150,000
`
`100,000
`
`50,000
`
`0
`
`Source: SG Cowen, IMS Monthly Prescriptions
`
`524
`
`
` March 05, 2004
`
`Petitioner Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. - Exhibit 1059 - Page 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket