throbber
United States Patent [191
`Dupre et al.
`
`[54] REINFORCED I.C. CARD
`
`[75]
`
`Inventors:
`
`Francois Dupre, Aubagne;
`Jean-Pierre Gloton, Aix En
`Provence, both of France
`
`[73] Assignee: Gemplus Card International,
`Gemenos, France
`
`[21] Appl. No.1 723,615
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`Jul. 1, 1991
`
`Foreign Application Priority Data
`[30]
`Jul. 10, 1990 [FR] France .............................. .. 90 08734
`
`[51] 1111.01.5 ....................... .. 006K 19/06; B32B 3/00
`[52] us. c1. .................................. .. 361/392; 361/380;
`174/35 R; 428/902
`Field of Search ........... .. 361/380, 392; 174/35 R,
`174/35 MS; 428/902, 402
`
`[58]
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`Nishimura CI al. ............... ..
`4,879,153 ll/1989 Ohaslu et a1. ............. .. 235/492
`4,908,937 3/1990 Gloton et al. . . . .
`. . . . . . . .. 29/840
`
`HIIIIllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`Us005214566A
`Patent Number:
`5,214,566
`May 25, 1993
`Date of Patent:
`
`[11]
`[45]
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`0071255 7/1982 European Pat. Off. .
`0211360 7/1986 European Pat. Off. .
`
`338
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Patent Absracts of Japan, vol.
`10, No.
`(P-516)[2394], 15 Nov. 1986; & JP-A-61 141089.
`Primary Examiner-Davis L. Willis
`Assistant Examiner-Esther H. Chin
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—-Pollock, VandeSande &
`Priddy
`ABSTRACI‘
`[57]
`To provide I.C. cards that are reinforced and above all
`in which the card body is compatible both with using
`theILC. in the card and with using a surface of the card
`that is coated with a ?lm of magnetic material, at least
`two reinforcing sheets made of different types of rein
`forcing material are provided so as to adapt the expan
`sion coefficient and the strength coefficient of the card
`so that both these coefficients lie within a range that is
`common to both card technologies. It is shown that this
`provides greater synergy in use of cards having both
`electronic memory and magnetic memory since in spite
`of temperature expansion magnetic card shapes are
`maintained’ thereby making possible to use magnetic
`t
`k th t
`1
`.th
`d ta t
`.
`t
`‘ac S
`3‘. °°mp y ‘Y’ mass 3 5 (“age requ‘rcmn 5
`
`4,941,257 7/1990 6101011 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
`
`. . . .. 29/840
`
`for “Se W111‘ magnet“: tracks‘
`
`4,943,464 7/1990 GlOlOn et a1. . . . .
`. . . .. 428/76
`4,990,759 2/1991 GlOIOl'l et a1. ..................... .. 235/492
`
`2 Claims, 2 Drawing Sheets
`
`1
`/
`l
`
`3
`‘
`\
`1
`
`,
`
`514” Q(/[
`05 Z’ATAA/V
`
`11
`
`12
`4 / / / l/
`f’ 7 H/ /§‘_ /;'‘7‘ 61/7]
`1 7!; 79
`
`-—
`
`_
`
`l
`
`7
`
`h]
`
`\_.__L__\__ 7._._____.
`/
`
`13
`
`2(2
`
`2 ELECTRICALLY
`CONDUCTIVE
`
`1/6
`
`DOJ EX. 1014
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`May 25, 1993
`
`Sheet 1 of 2
`
`5,214,566
`
`ELECTRICALLY
`CONDUCTIVE
`
`2/6
`
`DOJ EX. 1014
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`May 25, 1993
`
`Sheet 2 of 2
`
`5,214,566
`
`F|GJ+
`
`3O
`
`31
`
`XXXXXXX
`
`X )
`I}
`XXXXX‘XX WW}
`
`1
`
`> L
`
`CHIP 1
`
`3/6
`
`DOJ EX. 1014
`
`

`
`1
`
`REINFORCED LC. CARD
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention relates to a reinforced inte~
`grated circuit card, I.C. card, i.e. a card whose body is
`better able to withstand the external mechanical stresses
`applied thereto while being handled by its user. An
`other main object present invention is to make the tech
`nology of LC. cards more compatible with that of mag
`netic track cards, in order to improve the performance
`of these two technologies in combination.
`
`10
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`5,214,566
`2
`rudimentary equipment is all that is required for dupli
`cating the-information from such cards to cards made
`unprofessionally, thereby enabling cards to be used in
`ways that were not intended when they were issued.
`There also exist combined cards having both electronic
`and magnetic memory. The purpose is to make best use
`of the performance available from each of the two types
`of memory media. At present, practical use of such
`cards is prevented by problems associated with different
`tolerances in use.
`It has also been observed that problems of dimen
`sional stability occur because of the range of tempera
`tures to which cards are subjected in use. Dual memory
`type cards, in particular, can only be made both long
`lasting and highly reliable if they are simultaneously of
`great dimensional stability and also of considerable
`mechanical stiffness. In addition, making the card body
`of plastic gives rise to considerable electrostatic dis
`charge phenomena which are injurious both to an elec
`tronic micromodule and to a magnetic track.
`An object of the invention is to remedy the above
`mentioned drawbacks by proposing a technique for
`reinforcing cards that leads to such mechanical stability
`independently of temperature and which adapts itself to
`the mechanical and/or thermal expansion behavior of
`the micromodule or of the magnetic track. Thermal
`expansion can change a magnetic track to such an ex
`tent that the resulting format thereon no longer lies
`within the standards laid down. In order to adapt the
`deformation effects so as to keep them within a range of
`tolerances that is compatible with both of the technolo
`gies and regardless of temperature, the card body is
`reinforced in accordance with the invention by using at
`least two sheets of different strengthening materials.
`Each of these sheets is organized in a matrix con?gura- '
`tion and the two matrix con?gurations are preferably
`intermeshed, e.g. by offsetting one of the sheets by half
`a pitch relative to the other. It is then observed that the
`card body made of plastic itself absorbs the differential
`forces due to the two different materials, and instead of
`this leading to the card breaking up, it leads on the
`contrary to tolerances being satis?ed accurately.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`I.C. cards are known that are usable in banking and
`also for prepayment purposes: e.g. prepayment of a
`telephone call, prepayment of parking time for a vehi
`cle, etc. Such I.C. cards normally include a card body
`made of plastic in which a cavity is formed, which
`cavity receives an electronics micromodule provided
`with contact metallization for providing electrical com
`munication between the micromodule and the outside
`world. LC. cards have also been envisaged in which the
`micromodule is not provided with contact metalliza
`tion. In such applications, communication with the card
`takes place by radio.
`_
`One of the problems encountered with LC. cards is
`their mechanical strength. To this end, in order to be
`acceptable for use by the general public, cards must be
`capable of passing severe stress testing. During such
`testing which simulates situations that may arise in use,
`a card is curved some number of times perpendicularly
`to its long axis or to its short axis. A card is considered
`as passing such a test if the micromodule has not be
`come detached after a series of curving operations has
`been completed, and/or if the stresses have not been
`transferred to the micromodule suf?ciently to break it.
`Other tests relate to the bending strength of card bodies.
`In such tests, manufactured cards are required to with
`stand as high a bending force as possible. Beneath a
`given bending force card bodies are rejected, above it
`they are accepted.
`For the reasons mentioned above, card bodies have
`thus been reinforced, either overall or else in the prox
`imity of the region in a card body having the cavity
`which receives the micromodule. For example, Euro
`pean patent application number 0 071 255 published on
`Feb. 9, 1983 describes I.C. card media in which the
`plastic material used for the card body medium is rein
`forced with glass ?bers. In such a con?guration, during
`50
`co-lamination of the layers of the card body, use is made
`of a co-lamination core constituted by epoxy resin rein
`forced with glass ?bers.
`In magnetic track card applications, the back of a
`card is covered with a magnetic track in which informa
`tion is recorded. A reader can receive such cards and
`decode the information recorded thereon for the pur
`pose of identifying the card bearer. Normally the den
`sity of information actually stored on such tracks is low
`so as to provide tolerance to large variations in use. The
`difference between magnetic track cards and LC. cards
`comes from the fact that the quantity of information
`that can be stored with magnetic tracks is greater than
`the quantity that can be stored with electronic micro
`modules, but that access to the information is slower
`with magnetic tracks than it is with micromodules. In
`contrast, from the security point of view, magnetic
`track cards provide no security guarantee at all. Very
`
`40
`
`45
`
`55
`
`65
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention thus provides an LC. card
`comprising a card body made of plastic whose stiffness
`is reinforced by strengthening ?bers, the card body also
`being provided with a cavity for receiving an integrated
`circuit chip provided with means for establishing com
`munication between the chip circuit and the world
`outside the card, wherein the strengthening ?bers are,
`at least locally, of two different types and are placed in
`the card body in at least two sheets in two matrix con
`?gurations.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`An embodiment of the invention is described by way
`of example with reference to the accompanying draw
`ings, in which:
`FIG. 1 is a diagram of a reinforced I.C. card of the
`invention;
`FIG. 2 shows an electronic micromodule suitable for
`insertion in the card body of FIG. 1;
`FIG. 3 shows one example of how a card body of the
`invention may be manufactured by using a co-lamina
`tion method; and
`
`4/6
`
`DOJ EX. 1014
`
`

`
`3
`FIG. 4 is a section through an embodiment of an
`application of the invention using a micromodule belt.
`
`5
`
`30
`
`35
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`FIG. 1 shows an LC. card body of the invention. The
`card body is made of plastic, e.g. PVC or ABS, and its
`stiffness is reinforced by strengthening ?bers 2. The
`card body further includes a cavity 3 for receiving an
`integrated circuit (I.C.) chip 4 as shown in FIG. 2. The
`electronic chip 4 is contained in a micromodule 3 pro
`vided on its surface with metal tabs such as 5 to 10
`which are connected to the chip and which are intended
`to enable electrical communication to be established
`between the circuit 4 and the world outside the card.
`The special feature of the invention lies in the fact that
`the strengthening ?bers 2 comprise at least two sheets:
`a sheet 11 shown in continuous lines, and a sheet 12
`shown in dashed lines. The two sheets are made of
`materials of different types. In one example, the sheet 11
`is a sheet of carbon graphite while the sheet 12 is a sheet
`of boron ?ber Both of these sheets and 12 are made to
`have matrix con?gurations. In the example shown, the
`matrix con?gurations are simple con?gurations com
`prising perpendicular rows and columns with the inter
`row pitch being equal to the inter-column pitch. The
`25
`two matrix con?gurations 11 and 12 are intermeshed in
`each other, preferably by being offset by half of the
`pitch. In one embodiment, the ?bers in these two sheets
`are at a spacing of about 1 millimeter (mm). The diame
`ter of the ?bers is then about 0.05 mm.
`-
`The intermeshing of the sheets is not a necessary
`condition for enabling card body expansion to adapt to
`the constraints of the two technologies. However, in
`preferred manner, this intermeshing improves the trans
`fer of the reinforcing forces produced by the ?bers to
`the body of the card.
`As mentioned above, a card made in this way is pref
`erably a card having both magnetic and electronic
`memory. Thus, it includes a magnetic track on one of its
`faces 13 (the face that is not shown in FIG. 1) and occu
`pying all or a portion of the back of the card.
`FIG. 3 shows a co-lamination type manufacturing
`method. The bottom of the ?gure shows the conven
`tional manufacturing method prior to the reinforcement
`of the invention which is represented by the top of the
`?gure and by the outline arrow. For co-lamination,
`rotary presses 14 and 15 superpose layers of plastic that
`are presented flat after being paid out from reels 16 and
`17. A stack of two layers is shown, but in practice a
`larger number may be used. Above the top layer, a
`machine 18 is shown diagrammatically for the purpose
`of punching holes in the top layer to constitute card
`receiving cavities 3. In the invention, at least two rein
`forcing sheets (respectively 11 and 12) are co-laminated
`in an intermediate position in the card body. For exam
`ple, this means that the sheets 11 and 12 wound on
`respective reels 19 and 20 engage in the co-lamination
`method after layers 32 and 33. Each of the two sheets 11
`and 12 may be supported by natural gluing on a very
`?ne ?lm. So as to adjust the half-pitch offset between
`the matrix con?gurations of the two sheets, means are
`provided (represented in this case by a micrometer
`screw 21) for offsetting the axes of the reels 19 and 20
`relative to each other.
`In an improvement, one of the two sheets, e.g. the
`sheet 11, is wider than the sheet 12 and is even wider
`than the layers used in co-laminating the card bodies. In
`this way, the sheet 11 presents fringes 22 that project
`from the edges of the cards (as visible in FIG. 1). The
`
`5,214,566
`4
`sheet 11 is then preferably made of a material that con
`ducts electricity, and preferably of graphite. Under
`these conditions by rubbing against the edges of inser
`tion slots in LC. card readers that subsequently receive
`the cards, these fringes serve to establish an equipoten
`tial electrical surface within the body of the card itself,
`and above all to greatly simplify evacuating any charge
`that may accumulate during such electrostatic dis
`charges as may occur. To this end, the graphite of the
`sheet 11 could even be replaced by a con?guration of
`metal wires, e.g. wires made of copper or of aluminum.
`With different types of reinforcing materials, the
`expansion and the strength coef?cients are adapted so
`that these coef?cients lie in a range which is common to
`both card technologies: i.e. to magnetic cards and to
`electronic cards. To improve this adaptation, the fol
`lowing may be performed: either the shape of one of the
`matrix con?guration is altered, or the strength of a sheet
`is increased by changing the ?ber material or the ?ber
`diameter, or else a third sheet is used. In addition, the
`reinforcing forces can be limited locally within the card
`by extending the reinforcing con?guration or network
`only over portions of the ?lm carrying it, at least for one
`of the two sheets. On co-lamination, these localized
`reinforcing regions are placed close to the cavity.
`Thus, instead of treating the entire card body, the
`reinforcing action may be limited to a mechanical belt
`30 formed around the micromodule 31: see FIG. 4. This
`belt is preferably ?xed to the micromodule before the
`micromodule together with the belt is ?xed in'the card.
`With composite boron~carbon reinforcement as men
`tioned above, this has shown that it is possible to control
`the mechanical stresses that are transmitted to the mi
`cromodule per se when bending takes place. The micro
`module together with its belt is then not too rigid as
`would be the case using ?ber reinforcement made of a
`single, too hard type material. Consequently, the micro
`module and its belt do not become detached during
`bending tests. However, the reinforcement is strong
`enough to protect the micromodule itself. This rein
`forcement is stronger than that which can be obtained
`using ?bers of a single, too-soft type.
`In the invention, by controlling stiffnesses by an ap
`propriate selection of composite materials, the number
`of cards that pass bending tests is increased.
`We claim:
`1. An LC. card comprising a card body made of plas
`tic whose stiffness is reinforced by strengthening ?bers,
`the card body also being provided with a cavity for
`receiving an integrated circuit chip provided with
`means for establishing communication between the chip
`circuit and the world outside the card, wherein the
`strengthening ?bers are, at least locally, of two different
`types and are placed in the car body in at least two
`sheets and in two matrix con?gurations, wherein the
`two con?gurations are intermeshed.
`2. An I.C. card comprising a card body made of plas
`tic whose stiffness is reinforced by strengthening fibers,
`the card body also being provided with a cavity for
`receiving an integrated circuit chip provided with
`means for establishing communication between the chip
`circuit and the world outside the card, wherein the
`strengthening ?bers are, at least locally, of two different
`types and are placed in the card body in at least two
`sheets ‘and in two matrix con?gurations, wherein the
`two strengthening sheets are disposed in a belt ?xed
`around the micromodule including the chip prior to the
`micromodule and its belt being ?xed in the car body.
`i # i i i
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`5/6
`
`DOJ EX. 1014
`
`

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
`5,214,566
`May 25, 1993
`
`PATENT N0. :
`DATED
`;
`
`INVENTQMS) ;
`
`Francoise Dupre et al.
`
`It is certified that error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby
`corrected as shown below:
`
`Column 1 , line 9, after "object" insert --of the—-.
`
`Column 3, line 21, after "fiber" insert --.——.
`
`Column 3, line 21 , afterv "sheets" insert -—l1-—.
`
`Column 4, line 53, change "car" to --card-—.
`
`Column 4, line 67, change "car" to --card——.
`
`Signed and Sealed this
`
`Fifteenth Day of February, 1994
`
`AM:
`
`64144 W
`
`Arresting O?icer
`
`Commissioner of Parents and Trademarks
`
`BRUCE LEHMAN
`
`6/6
`
`DOJ EX. 1014

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket