Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Filed08/04/15 Page1 of 9
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Fi|ed08/04/15 Page1of9
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC, 21 Delaware Corporation,
`
`Case No.: 13-CV-03999-BLF
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, INC., a Deiaware
`
`Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`CASE NO. 13—CV-03999-BLF
`
`
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Fi|ed08/04/15 Page1of9
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC, 21 Delaware Corporation,
`
`Case No.: 13-CV-03999-BLF
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, INC., a Deiaware
`
`Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`CASE NO. 13—CV-03999-BLF
`
`
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Filed08/04/15 Page2 of 9
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Fi|ed08/04/15 Page2 of9
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`When answering the following questions and filling out this Verdict Form, please follow the
`
`directions provided throughout this Verdict Form. Your answer to each question must be unanimous.
`
`Some of the questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Jury
`
`Instructions. Please refer to the Jury Instructions if you are unsure about the meaning or usage of any
`
`legal term that appears in the questions below.
`
`We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return them
`
`under the instructions of this court as our Verdict in this case.
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`CASE NO. 13-CV-03999-BLF
`
`
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Filed08/04/15 Page3 of 9
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Fi|ed08/04/15 Page3 of9
`
`C
`
`_
`
`1 QUESTION 1: Did Finjan prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Blue Coat’s product or
`
`2
`
`combination of products as identified below literally infringes any of the following claims of the
`
`3 Asserted Patents? Answer “Yes” or “No” for each claim.
`
`Claim 10
`
`l\l O
`
`‘844 Patent
`
`WebPulse
`
`‘li"I:£lti1‘t
`
`Pr0xySG
`
`‘633 Patent
`
`Pr0xySG + CAS +
`
`MAA
`
`‘731 Patent
`
`Pr0xySG + WebPulse
`
`‘968 Patent
`
`ProxySG + WebPulse
`
`‘780 Patent
`
`Pr0xySG + I’roxyAV
`
`For each claim you did not find to be literally infringed, answer Question 2.
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`CASE NO. 13-CV-03999-BLF
`
`
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Filed08/04/15 Page4 of 9
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Fi|ed08/04/15 Page4 of9
`
`1 QUESTION 2: Did Finjan prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Blue Coat’s product or
`
`2 combination of products as identified below infringe under the doctrine of equivalents? Answer
`
`3
`
`“Yes” or “No” for each claim.
`
`‘844 Patent
`
`WebPuIse
`
`‘822 Patent
`
`ProxySG
`
`Eden:
`ProxySG + CAS +
`
`MAA
`
`‘968 Patent
`
`ProxySG + WebPulse
`
`‘780 Patent
`
`Pr0xySG + ProxyAV
`
`Claim 14 ya 3
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`CASE NO. l3-CV-03999-BLF
`
`
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Filed08/04/15 Page5 of 9
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Fi|ed08/04/15 Page5 of9
`
`‘
`
`I
`
`M
`
`1 QUESTION 3: What are the dates of invention for the ‘844 Patent and the ‘731 Patent?
`
`‘s44 Patent:
`
`NO V9.-wq b er , W ‘fé
`
`‘731Patent
`
`‘ ovfihfibfiv 6, 194/?
`
`Regardless of the dates you find, please answer Question 4 with respect to each patent.
`
`2 3 4 5
`
`6 7
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`CASE NO. 13-CV—O3999-BLF
`
`
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Filed08/04/15 Page6 of 9
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Fi|ed08/04/15 Page6 of9
`
`-
`
`1 QUESTION 4: Did Blue Coat prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following
`
`2 claims of the Asserted Patents are invalid because they are anticipated? Answer “Yes” or “No” for
`
`3
`
`each claim.
`
`‘S44 Patent
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,253,370 (“Abadi”)
`
`‘822 Patent
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,983,348 (“Ji”)
`
`‘633 Patent
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,983,348 (“Ji”)
`
`‘73I Patent
`
`_
`
`IBM WebSphere Edge
`Server: New Features
`and Function in
`
`Version 2, IBM
`Redbooks
`
`(“Braswell”)
`
`‘968 Patent
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,722,214 (“McClain”) 5
`
`‘780 Patent
`
`U.S. Patent No.
`
`5,815,709 (“Waldo”)
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`CASE NO. 13-CV-03999-BLF
`
`
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Filed08/04/15 Page7 of 9
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Fi|ed08/04/15 Page? of9
`
`-B
`
`'
`
`l
`
`1 Answer Question 5(a)-(f) only if you have found one or more claims of the Assorted Patents to be
`
`infringed and not invalid from Questions 1, 2 and 4.
`
`QUESTION 5(3): If you found any ofthe asserted ciaims ofthe ‘844 Patent to be infiringed and not
`
`invalid, what amount of damages has Finjan proven it is entitled to that would fairly and reasonably
`
`compensate it for Blue Coat’s infringement for the life of the patent?
`
`$ 245 O00 O00
`
`QUESTION 5111!: If you found any of the asserted claims of the ‘822 Patent to be infringed and not
`
`invalid, what amount of damages has Finj an proven it is entitled to that would fairly and reasonably
`
`compensate it for Blue Coat’s infringement for the life of the patent?
`
`$ 0
`
`QUESTION 51¢): If you found the asserted claim of the ‘633 Patent to be infringed and not invalid,
`
`what amount of damages has Finjan proven it is entitled to that would fairly and reasonably
`
`compensate it for Blue Coat’s infringement for the life of the patent?
`
`$l,6ée!¥00
`
`QUESTION 51 d}: If you found any of the asserted claims of the ‘731 Patent to be infringed and not
`
`invalid, what amount of damages has Finj an proven it is entitied to that would fairly and reasonably
`
`compensate it for Blue Coat’s infringement for the life of the patent?
`
`$
`
`6 000 000
`
`[continued to the next page]
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`CASE NO. 13-CV-03 999-BLF
`
`
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Filed08/04/15 Page8 of 9
`Case5:13—cv—O3999—BLF Document438 Fi|edO8/O4/15 Page8 of9
`
`'
`
`1 QUESTION 5; e): If you found the asserted claim of the ‘968 Patent to be infringed and not invalid,
`
`2 what amount of damages has Finjan proven it is entitled to that would fairly and reasonably
`
`compensate it for Blue Coat’s infringement for the life of the patent?
`
`$
`
`‘rig 1% 605000
`
`QUESTION 51:1: If you found any of the asserted claims of the ‘780 Patent to be infringed and not
`
`invalid, what amount of damages has Finjan proven it is entitled to that would fairly and reasonably
`
`compensate it for Blue Coat’s infringement for the life of the patent?
`
`$111,918?
`
`\DOO'--.'lO\U1-Jib)
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`
`
`Case5:13-cv-03999-BLF Document438 Filed08/04/15 Page9 of 9
`Case5:13—cv—O3999—BLF Document438 Fi|edO8/O4/15 Page9 of9
`
`You have now reached the end of the verdict form and should review it to ensure it accurately
`
`reflects your unanimous determinations. The Presiding Juror should then sign and date the verdict
`
`form in the spaces below and notify the Security Guard that you have reached a verdict. The Presiding
`
`Juror should retain possession of the Verdict form and bring it when the jury is brought back into the
`
`COL1l'l'.I'0OI'1'1 .
`
` DATED:
`
`,§c\x9‘u.st 4th ,20;E;
`
`By:
`
`Presiding
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`8
`
`13-15 6
`
`Ix.)
`
`'--JONU1-BUJ
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`.27
`
`28
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
