`
`KeyCite Yellow Flag - Negative Treatment
`Distinguished by
` Shire LLC v Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, D N J ,
`June 23, 2014
`
`
`
`534 Fed.Appx. 999 (Mem)
`This case was not selected for
`publication in the Federal Reporter.
`Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter.
`See Fed. Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1
`generally governing citation of judicial
`decisions issued on or after Jan. 1, 2007. See
`also Federal Circuit Rule 32.1 and Federal
`Circuit Local Rule 32.1. (Find CTAF Rule 32.1)
`United States Court of Appeals,
`Federal Circuit.
`
`Attorneys and Law Firms
`
`Theresa M. Gillis, Mayer Brown LLP, of New York, NY,
`argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief were John
`J. Molenda. Of counsel on the brief were Thomas W. Jenkins
`and Erick J. Palmer, of Chicago, IL.
`
`Jeffrey J. Toney, Kasowitz, Benson Torres & Friedman LLP,
`of Atlanta, GA, argued for defendants-appellants. With him
`on the brief were Jonathan K. Waldrop and Darcey L. Jones.
`Of counsel on the brief was Norman E.B. Minnear, of New
`York, NY. Of counsel was Parker C. Ankrum, of Redwood,
`CA.
`
`DYK, O'MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges.
`
`VALEANT INTERNATIONAL
`BERMUDA, Plaintiff–Appellee,
`v.
`ACTAVIS, INC., Watson Laboratories, Inc.-Florida,
`and Actavis Pharma, Inc., Defendants–Appellants.
`
`JUDGMENT
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
`
`Nos. 2012–1117, 2012–1307.
`|
`Oct. 16, 2013.
`
`ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
`
`AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
`
`Appeals from the United States District Court for the
`Southern District of Florida in No. 10–CV–20526.
`
`All Citations
`
`534 Fed.Appx. 999 (Mem)
`
`End of Document
`
`© 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
`
` © 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
`
`1
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`Grunenthal GmbH Exhibit 2005
`Rosellini v. Grunenthal GmbH
`IPR2016-00471
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
