throbber
F.H. Chung & D.K. Smith, "Industrial
`
`Applications of X-Ray Diffraction", Dekker,
`
`(2000), p21
`
`RS 1025 - 000001
`
`

`
`Frank H. Chung
`Sherwin-Williams Company
`Chicago, Illinois
`
`Deane K. Smith
`The Pennsylvania State
`University
`University Park, Pennsylvania
`
`MARCEL DEKKER, INC.
`
`RS 1025 - 000002
`
`

`
`., . _ .._,__.........-........----m.-....-.4
`
`ISBN: 0-8247-1992-1
`
`This book is printed on acid-free paper.
`
`Headquarters
`Marcel Dekker, Inc.
`270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016
`tel: 212-696-9000; fax: 212-685-4540
`
`Eastern Hemisphere Distribution
`Marcel Dekker AG
`
`Hutgasse 4, Postfach 812, CH--‘-$001 Basel, Switzerland
`tel: 41-61-261-8482; fax: 4]-6!-26!-8896
`
`World Wide Web
`http: / fwww.dekker.com
`
`The publisher offers discounts on this book when ordered in bulk quantities. For more information,
`write to Special Sales!Professional Marketing at the headquarters address above.
`
`Copyright © 2000 by Marcel Dekker, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
`
`Neither this book nor any part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means. elec-
`tronic or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or by any information
`storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
`
`Current printing (last digit):
`I0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
`
`PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`
`RS 1025 - 000003
`
`

`
`The Pm'c!iee of Dtflractfon Ana1y.ri.v
`
`2}
`
`may be used: individual peak information, the complete set ofd and 1 information, and
`as the whole trace. Individual peak information and the d—I set may be obtained from
`the trace by utilizing various peak-finding algorithms or by peak profile fitting using
`programs such as PRO—FlT (Toraya, 1986, 1993) and SHADOW (Howard and Preston,
`1989). The full pattern may be analyzed for only the peak positions by programs such
`as WPPF, which fits the unit cell parameters for one or more phases to the trace.
`Programs such as that of LeBail, Duroy, and Fourquet
`(1988) may accomplish the
`extraction of‘ the intensities for structure analysis. The Full structure refinement may
`be carried out by many Rietveld programs (Young, 1993). It is also possible to graphically
`decompose patterns by superposing a reference pattern from a full-pattern database
`without processing the raw data in any way (Smith, Hoyle, and Johnson 1993).
`It should be mentioned that there are two ways to extract information from a diffraction
`peak: decomposition and deconvolution. These terms are commonly misused, especially
`deconvolution. Decomposition is the separation of overlapped peaks by using a selected
`analytical profile and optimizing the fit ofthe cluster by adjusting the profile parameters.
`Deconvolution is the extraction of the sample contribution in a profile from the source
`and instrument contribution by elaborate mathematical methods that may involve some
`approximations. The profile—fitting procedures used for extracting position and intensity
`information involve decomposition. Separation ofsize and strain information by procedures
`such as the Warren—Averbach method involves deconvolution
`
`5. ANALYTICAL METHODS
`
`Powder diffraction techniques may be classified into those that yield a qualitative answer and
`those that yield a quantitative answer. Qualitative answers include confirmation or identi-
`fication of the phases present in a specimen and crude estimates of how much is present.
`Quantitative analysis provides numbers with estimated accuracy for crystallographic par-
`ameters including lattice dimensions, phase abundances, crystal structure coordinates,
`and other physical property data.
`The data in the PDF are most commonly used for phase identification. It must be
`remembered, when using the PDF, that all the d—1 tables are based on peak information.
`That is, the ds and P3 are reported for the peak positions from the experimental trace,
`and the peaks in a cluster are not decomposed into individual components. When making
`comparisons of diffraction data with the PDE one must use peak heights versus peak
`heights not peak areas versus peak heights {i.e., apples versus apples, not apples versus
`oranges).
`
`5.1. Qualitative Phase Analysis
`
`The identification of‘ phases based on their powder diffraction pattern dates back primarily
`to I-lanawalt and Rinn (1936) and became a common procedure when the Powder
`Diffraction File was published and contained sufficient data sets to yield matches. As
`the coverage of the PDF improves, phase identification also improves,
`It is impossible
`to locate a match for an experimental data set if the data for the phase in question are
`not included in the reference file.
`
`Where the user only wants to confirm the presence of a phase in a sample, it is a simple
`matter to locate an appropriate reference powder diffraction pattern and collect
`the
`experimental data for comparison. The problem arises when the user has little or no in-
`formation from which to start. Fortunately, the powder diffraction pattern can be a sufficient
`
`RS 1025 - 000004

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket