throbber
2016 J. Electrochem. Soc.: SOLID-STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY August 1988 110, 215 (1983). 3. H. Nakane, M. Nakayama, T. Ayabe, T. Nishimura, and T. Kimura, in "Proceedings of Semiconductors and Integrated Circuits Technology," Vol. 1, p. 571 (1978). 4. M. K. Lee, C. Y. Lu, and C. T. Shih, This Journal, 130, 2249 (1983). 5. D. E. Clark, C. G. Pantano, Jr., and L. L. Hench, "Corro- sion of Glass," Magazines for Industry, New York (1979). 6. W. A. Pliskin and H. S. Lehman, This Journal, 112, 1013 (1965). 7. W. A. Pliskin, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 14, 1064 (1977). 8. R. J. H. Lin, J. C. Lee, and P. B. Zimmer, ALO-5300-T2, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC (1979). Etching of Tungsten and Tungsten Silicide Films by Chlorine Atoms D. S. Fischl, *'l G. W. Rodrigues, 2 and D. W. Hess** Department of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 ABSTRACT Thin films of tungsten and tungsten silicide were etched both within and downstream from a C12 plasma discharge at 200 mtorr pressure and temperatures below 150~ When samples were positioned downstream from the discharge, etch- ing proceeded solely by chemical reaction of the film with chlorine atoms. Without a discharge, molecular chlorine did not etch tungsten or tungsten silicide. Downstream and in-plasma tungsten etch rates were approximately equal at 110~ but the chlorine atom etch rate dropped more rapidly than the in-plasma etch rate as temperature decreased. The chemical re- action between chlorine atoms and the tungsten film was proportional to the gas phase C1 atom mole fraction. A pretreat- ment consisting of either a dilute hydrofluoric acid dip or a short plasma etch cycle was necessary for atom etching of tungsten silicide films. The etch rates of tungsten silicide in C12 plasmas were approximately an order of magnitude higher and less temperature sensitive than those in the downstream (atom) configuration. The patterning of tungsten and tungsten silicide for mi- croelectronic circuits has been accomplished by a variety of halogen-based dry processing etching techniques (1-8). Publications on the patterning of these materials using chlorine have only summarized the effects that the process parameters have on the anisotropy, etch rate, and selectiv- ity (5). The limited results suggest that the etch rate of tungsten is related to the concentration of chlorine atoms, C1, produced by either laser irradiation (8) or gas-phase electron impact dissociation (5) of molecular chlorine, C12. However, the etching process was controlled empirically and thus is not based on a fundamental understanding of the etching mechanism. Control of thin film etching processes during microelec- tronic device manufacture is often difficult. In large part, the difficulties arise from the complexity of RF glow dis- charges, coupled with plasma-film interactions. One method of simplifying the etch chemistry of these pro- cesses is to utilize an upstream discharge to generate reac- tive atoms for etching. Since ion, electron, and photon bombardment are absent in this configuration, the pure atom etch chemistry can be studied. Comparison of down- stream etching with in-plasma or discharge etching then generates insight into the role of the plasma. Furthermore, such investigations yield fundamental information con- cerning atom reactions with materials. In this paper we present results on the chlorine atom etching (downstream or flowing afterglow reactor configuration) and C12 dis- charge etching of tungsten and tungsten silicide thin films. Experimental The reactor used for plasma etching (in the discharge) has been described in an earlier publication (5). The flow reactor was modified for atom etching by connecting a dis- charge and flow tube upstream from the etching reactor. A schematic of the system can be found in Ref. (9). An upstream RF discharge was used to dissociate C12 molecules into C1 atoms, which then passed through a flow tube into the reactor where they reacted chemically with tungsten or tungsten silicide samples without the in- fluence of the discharge. Power was supplied by a Tegal *Electrochemical Society Student Member. **Electrochemical Society Active Member. 1present address: Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Applied Re- search and Development, Allentown, PA 18195. 2Present address: Department of Chemical Engineering, Univer- sity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706. Corporation 300W RF generator and matching network to the upstream discharge via two 1.0 cm wide copper bands that were placed around the 3.8 cm diam quartz discharge tube. Spacing between the bands was 1.0 cm. A metal box enclosed the discharge area to ensure RF shielding and to facilitate forced air cooling of the tube. The 3.8 cm diam Pyrex flow tube contained two 90 ~ bends to prevent light from the upstream discharge from reaching the reactor and thus the photomultiplier tube. The flow tube was coated with Halocarbon Corporation 1200 wax to minimize recombination of C1 atoms. The tubes and reactor were connected using MDC Corporation glass to metal Kwik- Flange adapters. Samples were placed inside the 2.6 liter Pyrex reactor chamber on a temperature controlled 2.5 cm diam anodized aluminum rod that served as the lower electrode for plasma etching experiments. Rod temperature was var- ied from 25 ~ to 150~ using heating tape and an Omega En- gineering Incorporated Model 650/660 controller. In order to reduce the surface area for atom recombination and thus increase the atom concentration at the sample sur- face, the upper electrode was removed during tungsten atom etching experiments. Molecular and atomic chlorine traveled approximately 60 cm from the discharge section to the sample location. The chlorine flow rate was controlled by a needle valve and measured with a rotameter. Vacuum was provided by a liquid nitrogen cold trap and a Busch Corporation Lotos corrosion resistant mechanical pump. The pressure in the reactor (200 mtorr) was established by a throttling valve at the exit from the reactor and was monitored by a capaci- tance manometer. The gas phase chlorine atom concentration at the posi- tion of the sample was measured by titration with nitrosyl chloride (10-13). The NOC1 titrant (Matheson) entered the reactor approximately 7 cm upstream from the sample lo- cation through a manifold to disperse gas evenly through- out the flow cross section. Flow rate was regulated by a needle valve and measured with a Tylan FM 360 mass flow- meter. Monel and Teflon were the materials used for the NOC1 delivery system. A Hamamatsu R1928 photomul- tiplier tube with a Melles Griot 03FIV008 filter was used to monitor the 550 nm emission (chemiluminescence) result- ing from the recombination reaction of chlorine atoms (9, 13, 14) at the position of the sample. Tungsten films were prepared by sputter deposition and had a thickness of 100 nm and resistivity of 500 ~-cm.
`
`
`
`151.207.250.13Downloaded on 2015-07-30 to IP
`
` address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see
`
`ecsdl.org/site/terms_use
`
`) unless CC License in place (see abstract).(cid:160)
`
`LAM Exh 1005-pg 1
`
`

`
`Vol. 135, No. 8 TUNGSTEN AND TUNGSTEN SILICIDE FILMS 2017 0.4 (cid:12)9 ~ 0.3 ~ 0.2 < "~- 0.1 ~J 0.0 0 200 Residence Time in Flow Tube (sec) 0.17 0.08 0.06 i I i 200 nfl'orr 75 Walls [] i lO0 Molecular Chlorine Flow Rate (sccm) Fig. 1. Effect of Cla flow rate on the atom yield in the reactor at 200 mtorr total pressure and for two different powers to the upstream dis- charge. Chemical vapor deposition was used to form the 250 nm thick tungsten silicide films which had a resistivity of 1000 ~-cm, and an approximate Si/W ratio of 2.5. Both film types were deposited onto oxidized silicon wafers, which were then broken into samples of approximately 1 cm 2 [de- tails of film preparation can be found in Ref. (5)]. Etch rates were determined from the film thickness and the time re- quired for the film to visually clear from the oxide surface. Results Chlorine atoms.--Molecular chlorine gas, CI2, is partially dissociated into C1 atoms by the upstream plasma. These atoms then travel through the flow tube to the reactor with some of them recombining by third body (e.g., C12 or wall) collisions. The concentration of gas-phase chlorine atoms in the reactor at the location of the sample is varied by changing the C12 flow rate and the upstream discharge power. Titration results yield a linear relationship between the C1 atom concentration and the square root of the chem- iluminescence intensity (13-15). The C1 atom concentration is then easily determined by measurement of the intensity. Since all experiments are performed at a constant pressure of 200 mtorr, results are presented in terms of the chlorine atom mole fraction. The effect of chlorine flow rate on the atom yield in the reactor is shown in Fig. 1. At constant RF power, a fixed amount of C12 is dissociated in the upstream discharge. The number of atoms that recombine while traveling to the reactor depends on the flow rate, pressure, and recom- bination kinetics. These data show that the chlorine atom mole fraction increases with an increase in flow rate at con- stant pressure. This behavior is consistent with a decrease in gas residence time at higher flow rates since shorter resi- dence times mean that more of the atoms produced in the discharge arrive at the reactor before recombining (16). However, the atom mole fraction levels off at higher flow 0.6 r (cid:12)9 ~ o.s ~ 0.4 N o.3 < 0.2 o= 0.1 ~J 0.0 200 mTorr /n 50 100 Power (Watts) 150 Fig. 2. Effect of the upstream power on the atom yield in the reactor at 200 mtorr pressure and 100 sccm CI2 flow. rates because, at constant power, the number of atoms pro- duced decreases when the residence time in the upstream discharge becomes too short. Figure 1 also shows that an increase in power to the upstream discharge increases the chlorine atom mole fraction. This effect is due to increased electron impact dissociation of chlorine molecules. Figure 2 shows the effect of increasing the RF power to the upstream discharge at a constant flow rate of 100 sccm C12 and a pressure of 200 mtorr. As expected, an increase in power produces an increase in the C1 atom fraction. At 100W, one-third of the molecular chlorine molecules that enter the system remain dissociated when they arrive at the sample location. The data shown in Fig. 2 emphasize the fact that molecular dissociation is not linearly related to the applied discharge power. Tungsten etching.--The effect of temperature on the tungsten etch rate at a pressure of 200 mtorr and a total gas flow rate of 100 sccm is shown in Fig. 3. Solid symbols rep- resent data from plasma etching experiments (5), where the sample is positioned within the discharge and subjec- ted to ion bombardment. The open squares are results from the current study, where etching of the tungsten film is solely due to chemical reaction with chlorine atoms. For these data points, the gas-phase mole fraction of chlorine atoms, C1, is 0.5. Without an upstream or in situ discharge, no reaction of tungsten occurs with chlorine molecules, C12, at temperatures up to 150~ However, it should be mentioned that thermal dissociation of chlorine molecules and subsequent reaction with tungsten occurs at surface temperatures above 600~ (8, 17). As the temperature is re- duced, etch rates fall and the rate enhancement by ion bombardment is greater than at higher temperatures. The atom and plasma etch rates are approximately equal at ll0~ Obviously, in plasma etching, the etch rate is not critically dependent on thermal heating which is a control- ling factor in atom etching. In the case of plasma etching, ion bombardment from the discharge supplies energy to break bonds as well as heat the surface. However, experi- ments using thermally bonded samples have shown that plasma heating does not significantly affect the tungsten etch rate (5). If an Arrhenius temperature dependence is assumed, the apparent activation energies of the reactions are 0.1 and 0.3 eV/molecule for plasma etching and atom etching, respectively. It was shown in Fig. 2 that the atom concentration in the reactor can be varied by changing the upstream discharge power. This fact is used to quantitatively determine the ef- fect of the gas-phase chlorine atom concentration on the tungsten etch rate. The data in Fig. 4 are from experiments at three different temperatures with the flow rate and the pressure constant at 100 sccm and 200 mtorr, respectively. At these temperatures, the etch rate varies linearly with the gas-phase chlorine atom mole fraction. The solid lines depict the best fit for all data and are described by Temperature (C) 112 84 60 40 103 I i I I 1~ 2 (cid:12)9 ,~ lO 1 io ~ 200 mTorr atom etching, 100 sccm , I i I , I i I , 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 1/Temp X 1000 (I/K) Fig. 3. Effect of temperature on the atom and in-discharge etch rate of tungsten at 200 mtorr pressure and 100 sccm CI2 flow. The chlorine atom mole fraction is 0.5 for the atom etching.
`
`
`
`151.207.250.13Downloaded on 2015-07-30 to IP
`
` address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see
`
`ecsdl.org/site/terms_use
`
`) unless CC License in place (see abstract).(cid:160)
`
`LAM Exh 1005-pg 2
`
`

`
`2018 J. Electrochem. Soc.: SOLID-STATE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY August 1988 40 200 mTorr / 100 seem ,o ,o09/ ca 20 0- i i i 0.0 0,2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Chlorine Atom Mole Fraction Fig. 4. Effect of chlorine atom mole fraction on the tungsten etch rate at 200 mtorr pressure, 100 sccm CIz flow, and three different rod temperatures. Etch rate [nm/min] = 2.3 x 106 Xc: exp (-3900/T) where Xca is the chlorine atom mole fraction in the gas- phase and T is the anodized aluminum rod temperature in Kelvin. The pre-exponential constant in the equation does not change with flow rate over the range of 20-150 sccm. This observation indicates that the reaction is not limited by a mass-transport boundary layer. At 200 mtorr pressure and Xc: = 0.5, kinetic theory predicts that approximately 1019 chlorine atoms strike a square centimeter of surface per second. An etch rate of 40 nm/min requires that ap- proximately 101~ tungsten atoms leave a square centimeter of surface per second. If the etch product is assumed to be WC14, the reaction probability of C1 atoms is approximately 10 .4 . This is the predominate product detected by ultra- high vacuum experiments with molecular and atomic chlorine beams and is also the product predicted by evalu- ation of equilibrium vapor pressures of the possible tungsten chloride products at these temperatures (17). Tungsten silicide etching.--Unlike tungsten, tungsten silicide that is exposed to air for longer than a few days does not etch spontaneously with chlorine atoms. How- ever, if the samples are first dipped in a 5% HF solution or subjected to a C12 plasma discharge they can be etched downstream by chlorine atoms. Apparently, ion bombard- ment is necessary to remove the silicon dioxide layer that forms on the surface of the samples during exposure to air at room temperature. Therefore, tungsten silicide is etched by chlorine atoms by first subjecting the samples to a C12 discharge for 30s (200 mtorr, 150 sccm total gas flow, 10W), which is the shortest time found to ensure complete re- moval of the native oxide layers. The amount of material removed during the 30s is calculated based on plasma etching experiments at the same temperature and the re- Temperature (C) 112 84 60 103 I I I maining film thickness is used in the atom etch rate calcu- lation. Althouugh this procedure is not ideal, the error is small. Furthermore, the etch rates calculated in this man- ner are in agreement with the rates obtained by using an HF dip prior to the etch run. Because exposure to air re- sults in the growth of an oxide film on the WSi~ surface, the upper electrode used for the plasma etch remains in place during the atom experiments. This electrode offers addi- tional surface area for C1 atom recombination compared to the electrode configuration for the tungsten etching exper- iments. Chlorine atom concentrations arethus lower than observed for identical upstream discharge studies when etching tungsten (compare Fig. 4 and 6). The plasma pre- treatment is preferred over the HF dip because the film clears more uniformly and the endpoint is easier to ob- serve. Without a discharge, tungsten silicide did not etch in molecular chlorine under the conditions investigated. The effect of temperature on the etch rate of tungsten sil- icide films in the discharge and by C1 atoms is shown in Fig. 5, where the data are obtained at 200 mtorr and 150 sccm C12 flow rate. The solid symbols are the plasma etch- ing results and the open symbols are the C1 atom etching results with a C1 mole fraction of 0.2. Clearly, tungsten sili- cide is etched by C1 atoms, but at a much slower rate than that obtained in the discharge when ion bombardment oc- curs. However, the relatively low atom concentrations could also be a major cause of the reduced etch rates in the downstream configuration. Similar to the tungsten etching results shown in Fig. 3, plasma etch rates of tungsten silicide are less temperature dependent than atom etch rates. The apparent activation energies calculated from the data in Fig. 5 are 0.06 and 0.16 eV/molecule for plasma etching and atom etching, respec- tively. The etch rate of silicon is known to be greatly enhanced by ion bombardment in C12 discharges (18, 19). Further- more, preliminary investigations in our laboratory indicate that heavily doped (approximately 102o cm -3) n + polysili- con films are etched by C1 atoms (downstream configura- tion) at comparable rates to those observed for W and WSix. Therefore, the large etch rate enhancement due to the discharge and the magnitude of the atom etch rate sug- gest that the overall etching process of tungsten silicide is limited by the presence of silicon in the film. Whether this observation is due to volatility considerations, a reduction in electron concentration in the solid (resulting in lowered etchant adsorption), or the fact that the strong (1.8 eV) Si--Si bond is essentially eliminated in the silicide films is not clear at this time. The variation of WSix etch rate with the limited range of chlorine atom mole fractions achieved is shown in Fig. 6 for 100~ 200 mtorr, and 150 sccm. Again, the etch rate in- creases with an increase in the Cl-atom mole fraction. Un- fortunately, because of the limited range of chlorine atom concentrations that could be obtained with our apparatus, a general kinetic expression describing atom etching of the tungsten silicide films was not formulated. 40 E lO 2 ~ 101 plasma etching A A atom etching 200 mTorr 150 sccm 10 0 , I = [ s I t 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 l/Temp. X 10O0 (l/K) Fig. 5. Effect of temperature on the atom and in-discharge etch rote of tungsten silicide at 200 mtorr pressure and 150 sccm CI2 flow. The chlorine atom mole fraction is 0.2 for the atom etching. .: 30 E e-, 2O ~ 10 200 mTorr 150 sccm 100 C 0 , I , I 0.0 0.l 0.2 0.3 Chlorine Atom Mole Fraction Fig. 6. Effect of chlorine atom mole fraction on the tungsten silicide etch rate at 100~ temperature, 150 sccm 02 flow, and 200 mtorr total pressure.
`
`
`
`151.207.250.13Downloaded on 2015-07-30 to IP
`
` address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see
`
`ecsdl.org/site/terms_use
`
`) unless CC License in place (see abstract).(cid:160)
`
`LAM Exh 1005-pg 3
`
`

`
`Vol. 135, No. 8 TUNGSTEN AND TUNGSTEN SILICIDE FILMS 2019 Conclusions Tungsten and tungsten silicide thin films have been etched both by C12 plasma discharges and by C1 atoms without the influence of the plasma. Molecular chlorine did not etch the films at the temperatures investigated. Both films could be etched by atomic chlorine, however, a native oxide layer present on tungsten silicide had to be re- moved before the atoms could attack the film. The results show that plasma interactions greatly enhance the C1 atom etch rate of tungsten silicide. However for tungsten, the etching process proceeds mainly by chemical reaction of the film with C1 atoms and is less affected by the plasma. Acknowledgments The authors thank P. Marmillion at IBM Essex Junction, Vermont for supplying the tungsten and tungsten silicide samples used in this investigation. The corrosion resistant pump was supplied by Busch Incorporated, Virginia Beach, Virginia and maintained by Semivac Corporation in M~lpitas, California. This work was funded by Intel Cor- poration and the California State MICRO program. Manuscript submitted Oct. 9, 1987; revised manuscript received Jan. 18, 1988. REFERENCES 1. S. P. Murarka, Solid State Technol., 181 (Sept. 1985); S.P. Murarka, "Silicides for VLSI Applications," Academic Press, Inc., Orlando, FL (1983). 2. Y. Pauleau, Solid State Technol., 61 (Feb., 1987); R. S. Blewer, ibid., 117 (Nov. 1986). 3. T. P. Chow and A. J. Steckl, This Journal, 131, 2325 (1984). 4. Workshop on Tungsten and Other Refractory Metals for VLSI Applications, Continuing Education in En- gineering, University Extension, University of Cali- fornia, Berkeley, Palo Alto, CA, Nov. 12-14, 1986. 5. D. S. Fischl and D. W. Hess, This Journal, 134, 2265 (1987). 6. G. Koren, Appl. Phys. Lett., 47, 1012 (1985). 7. M. Rothschild, J. H. C. Sedlacek, and D.J. Ehrlich, ibid., 49, 1554 (1986). 8. M. Rothschild, J. H. C. Sedlacek, J. G. Black, and D. J. Ehrlich, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B~ 5, 414 (1987). 9. D. A. Danner and D. W. Hess, J. Appl. Phys., 59, 940 (1986). 10. M. A. A. Clyne and W. S. Nip, in "Reactive Interme- diates in the Gas Phase," by D.W. Setser, Editor, Chap. 1, Academic Press, Inc. (1979). 11. M. A. A. Clyne, H. W. Cruse, and R. T. Watson, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. II, 68, 153 (1972). 12. M. A. A. Clyne and H. W. Cruse, ibid., 68, 1281 (1972). 13. M. A. A. Clyne and D. H. Stedman, Trans. Faraday Soc., 64, 1816 (1968). 14. M. A. A. Clyne and D. H. Stedman, ibid., 64, 2698 (1968). 15. M. A. A. Clyne and D. J. Smith, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2, 75, 704 (1979). 16. C. G. Hill, "An Introduction to Chemical Engineering Kinetics and Reactor Design," p. 262, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York (1977). 17. M. Balooch, D. S. Fischl, D. R. Olander, and W. J. Siek- haus, This Journal, 135, 0000 (1988). 18. S. C. McNevin and G. E. Berker, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 3. 485 (1985). 19. R. H. Bruce, Solid State Technol., 64 (Oct. 1981). Phosphorous Vacancy Nearest Neighbor Hopping Induced Instabilities in InP Capacitors I. Experimental M. T. Juang, J. F. Wager, and J. A. Van Vechten* Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Center for Advanced Materials Research, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 ABSTRACT Variable temperature bias-stress measurements were performed on n-type InP MIS capacitors. Two distinct activa- tion energies at 40-50 meV and 1.1-1.2 eV were obtained over a temperature range of 100-350 K. These energies are consist- ent with the instability mechanisms of thermionic tunneling into native oxide traps and phosphorous vacancy nearest neighbor hopping (PVNNH). The estimated fraction of shift in these particular samples due to PVNNH varies both with stress time and with temperature from about 20% for short times at 300 K to about 80% for long times at 350 K. The drain current of an InP metal insulator semicon- ductor field effect transistor (MISFET) is often observed to decrease as a function of time after the application of a positive gate bias which induces an accumulation of elec- trons in the channel. Various models have been proposed for this drain current drift (DCD) phenomena [see Ref. (1) for a critical review of proposed DCD models]. In this study, we have employed variable temperature bias-stress measurements (see the section on Experimen- tal Procedure for a description of this technique) of InP MIS capacitors in order to determine the dominant DCD mechanisms from an analysis of the activation energy of the flatband shift. There are two advantages inherent in bias-stress measurements of MIS capacitors compared to DCD measurements of InP MISFET's. First, fabrication of the MIS capacitor requires fewer processing steps so that the interface chemistry can be precisely controlled and the electrical instabilities may be correlated to the interface chemistry. A second advantage is that the flatband shift depends only on the carrier density in the channel while *Electrochemical Society Active Member. drain current instabilities depend on both the carrier den- sity and carrier mobility. Thus, interpretation of bias- stress measurements is more direct than that of DCD. Two distinct activation energies at 40-50 meV and 1.1-1.2 eV were obtained from variable temperature bias-stress measurements over a temperature range of 100-350 K. The 40-50 meV activation energy dominates the flatband shift at low temperatures and is consistent with thermally acti- vated tunneling of electrons from the InP conduction band into a discrete trap in the native oxide. An activation energy of 1.2 eV was predicted (2) for phosphorous va- cancy nearest neighbor hopping (PVNNH) in which the channel electrons are captured by shallow acceptors that are created by the hopping of an In atom into a phos- phorous vacancy. PVNNH leads to DCD in the following manner. Con- sider an InP MISFET which has processing-induced P va- cancies in the channel region under its gate. Nearest neigh- bor hopping of an In atom into the P vacancy is described by the following defect reaction Ini~ + Vp + + 4e- = VI~- Inp -2 [1]
`
`
`
`151.207.250.13Downloaded on 2015-07-30 to IP
`
` address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see
`
`ecsdl.org/site/terms_use
`
`) unless CC License in place (see abstract).(cid:160)
`
`LAM Exh 1005-pg 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket