throbber
Page 237
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` ----------------------
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
` ----------------------
` FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
` Petitioner,
` V.
` ONESUBSEA IP UK LIMITED,
` Patent Owner.
` ------------------------
` Case IPR2016-00328, -00467, -00378, -00495
` U.S. Patent No. 8,540,018
`
` ------------------------
`
` DEPOSITION OF ROBERT HERRMANN, VOLUME 2
` HOUSTON, TEXAS
` AUGUST 23, 2016
`
`Reported by: Susan S. Klinger, RMR-CRR, CSR
`Job No. 111713
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 1
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`
`Page 238
`
` August 23, 2016
` 9:12 a.m.
`
` Deposition of ROBERT HERRMANN, held at the
`offices of Fish & Richardson, 1221 McKinney Street,
`Houston, Texas, before Susan S. Klinger, a
`Registered Merit Reporter and Certified
`Realtime Reporter of the State of Texas.
`
`1
`
`2 3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 2
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 239
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`A P P E A R A N C E S:
`
`Attorneys for Petitioner:
` Mr. Michael Kiklis, Esq.
` Mr. Christopher Ricciuti, Esq.
` OBLON McCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT
` 1940 Duke Street
` Alexandria, Virginia 22314
`
`Attorneys for Patent Owner:
` Mr. Bret Winterle, Esq.
` Mr. Joshua Griswold, Esq. (Telephonically)
` FISH & RICHARDSON
` 1717 Main Street
` Dallas, Texas 75201
`
`Also Present:
` Ms. Paula Whitten-Doolen, Schlumberger
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 3
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 240
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` I N D E X
`
`WITNESS PAGE
`
`ROBERT HERRMANN
`
`EXAMINATION BY MR. KIKLIS 241
`EXAMINATION BY MR. WINTERLE 317
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5 6
`
`7 8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 4
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 241
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` ROBERT HERRMANN,
`having been first duly sworn testified as
`follows:
` EXAMINATION
`BY MR. KIKLIS:
` Q. Welcome back, Mr. Herrmann. We are
`starting the second day of your deposition for
`the four cases that we discussed yesterday. Do
`you understand that?
` A. I do.
` Q. Did you talk to anybody about your
`deposition at all since we started yesterday
`morning?
` A. I did not.
` Q. I would like to direct your
`attention to Kelly. I left it open for you
`right there. Do you remember yesterday you
`marked that up?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And you put a red circle around
`where the wing block would have to be attached
`to the tree?
` A. Where a wing block would be
`attached.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 5
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 242
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` Q. Would be attached?
` A. Yes.
` Q. To a tree, yes. So where you
`circled in red is the, I guess, the outer
`bounds of the tree; is that right, where the
`tree ends?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` Q. What would you call it?
` A. It is the outlet, the production
`outlet for the tree.
` Q. So but that is where the tree ends;
`is that right?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. No.
` Q. Where does the tree end, in your
`opinion?
` A. Well, vertically it ends at the tree
`cap. Horizontally it has got two boundaries,
`one for the annulus outlet and one for the
`production outlet, this tree, yes.
` Q. And where does, I'm sorry, where
`does the production outlet end in Figure 1?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. Could you use a different word than
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 6
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 243
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`"end"? Where is it located?
` Q. Well, I'm trying to figure out --
`I'm trying to find out where the production
`outlet ends?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` Q. Doesn't that make sense?
` A. No.
` Q. So what -- how would you describe
`the beginning and end of the production outlet?
` A. That is a different question.
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection, form.
` A. As we did in our -- either the
`petition or the declaration for this one
`production outlet starts downstream of the
`production valve and ends at the terminus of
`24.
` Q. Now, let me direct your attention to
`column 2.
` A. Go ahead. I'm going to get some
`water. Thank you.
` Q. So I believe it is your testimony
`that the tree comprises the center column, if
`you will, of Figure 1. And you have marked in
`red where the end of that tree would be; right?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 7
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 244
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. No.
` Q. On the lateral side?
` A. No.
` Q. Okay.
` A. I never talked about the end of a
`tree.
` Q. Well, what would you define the tree
`as in Figure 1?
` A. We have Figure 1 generally looking
`at the tree assembly which includes the branch
`outlet and the choke, the tree cap, everything
`that you run all at once. The tree itself is,
`the Christmas tree itself, the tree body is
`that piece in the middle with the four valves.
` Q. And everything to the right of the
`tree body, so you have got a wing valve; right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And then to the right of the wing
`valve you have, I believe you called it a T
`block; is that right?
` A. That's the T block, yes, I labeled
`it.
` Q. And then there is where the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 8
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 245
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`production flow takes its downward turn; is
`that right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Now, what would you call the piping
`that extends from the T block down to line 20?
` A. I believe we called it part of the
`production branch.
` Q. Production branch?
` A. It is in -- it is --
` Q. You said "we." What would you call
`it as one of ordinary skill?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. I have called it something -- may I
`review the declaration and see what I called
`it?
` Q. Sure.
` A. Actually in the petition may I
`review the petition and see what we, how we
`labeled that?
` Q. Well, you understand, you keep using
`the word "we." And I want to be very clear
`that what we're -- what I'm asking you for is
`what your opinion is in terms of what one of
`ordinary skill in the art would think when
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 9
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 246
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`looking at the Kelly patent?
` A. My opinion --
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. -- is how we labeled it in the
`petition. May I look at the petition?
` Q. You have everything in front of you,
`sir.
` A. Yes, it is on Figure 4 of the
`petition, the '018 petition.
` Q. If you need to refresh your
`recollection that is fine, but I would like to
`focus your testimony on Figure 1 of the Kelly
`patent. And my question to you, sir, is the
`vertical piping extending downwardly from the T
`block, production T block that you have
`identified on line 20, what in your opinion
`would one of ordinary skill in the art call
`that piping?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. If you refer -- Figure 1; right?
`You refer to Figure 1 in the petition we call
`that --
` Q. Sir, I'm referring to Figure 1 in
`the Kelly patent. Do you have the Kelly patent
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 10
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 247
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`in front of you?
` A. That is Figure 1 of the Kelly
`patent.
` Q. That is fine, but I'm not talking
`about the petition, I'm talking about Kelly
`Figure 1.
` A. Yes.
` Q. So I want your testimony with
`respect to Kelly Figure 1?
` A. Yes. As shown in the petition,
`Figure 1 for Kelly it shows that vertical part
`to be part of a diverter.
` Q. So one of ordinary skill in the art
`looking at the vertical piping from the T block
`to line 20 in Kelly would just think of that as
`a diverter; is that what your testimony is?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. Say that again.
` (Record read.)
` A. No, it is not.
` Q. I'm going to ask you again, sir.
`The vertical piping extending from the T block
`to line 20 in Figure 1 of Kelly what would one
`of ordinary skill in the art call that piping?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 11
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 248
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. We called it part of the diverter
`assembly.
` Q. Again, sir, I'm not asking what we
`called it, FMC called it, your lawyers called
`it or anybody else. I'm asking, and if you
`don't want to provide the testimony just say so
`and I will move on. If you don't have an
`answer to the question just say so and I will
`move on. Can you answer my question?
` A. I did.
` Q. No, you didn't. My question to you,
`sir, was looking at Figure 1 and you are
`looking at the petition. Looking at Figure 1
`the vertical piping that extends from the T
`block, Figure 1 of Kelly all the way down to
`line 20, what would one of ordinary skill in
`the art call that piping?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. By itself?
` Q. Yes.
` A. Just by itself without looking at
`something different, something more that tells
`me you would call that part of the discharge,
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 12
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 249
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`production discharge line.
` Q. Now, one of ordinary skill in the
`art looking at line 20 which extends from the
`production discharge line to collet body 22 in
`Figure 1 of Kelly, what would they call that?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. I just answered that.
` Q. No, I was specifically asking you my
`last question, sir, between the vertical pipe
`extending from the T block to line 20, I was
`very clear about that?
` A. What was my answer?
` Q. I believe you know what you
`answered. Do we need to read back your answer?
` (Record read.)
` Q. Now, line 20 of Figure 1 of Kelly
`what would you -- what would one of ordinary
`skill in the art call that?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. I'm sorry, I'm confused. I thought
`I just answered that. I thought that is what
`she just read and I just answered it. I'm
`sorry, I'm just not following you.
` Q. Okay. Do you see the T block in
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 13
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 250
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`Figure 1 of Kelly?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Do you see the pipe extending
`downwardly from the T block that apparently
`connects to line 20, do you see that?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. It doesn't connect to line 20, but
`go ahead.
` Q. What does it do then?
` A. It connects to 22.
` Q. So but there is separate piping it
`looks like 20?
` A. Okay.
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. Say that again.
` Q. But it looks like there is separate
`piping coming off of the vertical pipe between
`the T block and which constitutes line 20?
` A. That is probably the same pipe. I
`don't think it is separate piping.
` Q. Well, it looks like it is different
`piping.
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection.
` Q. But I'm just asking --
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 14
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 251
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` A. How does it look like it is
`different piping?
` Q. Well, the diameters look different.
` A. You are looking at the guidepost.
` Q. Okay. Then it is your testimony
`that line 20 would connect all the way up to
`the T block?
` A. It looks like to me, yes.
` Q. Where are you getting that from?
` A. Figure 1.
` Q. So line 20, in your opinion, is one
`of -- let me start over.
` So in your opinion, one of ordinary
`skill in the art would consider line 20 to be
`the production discharge line?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. As I said if you took line -- take
`off everything else and only look at the
`terminus of line 20 consider nothing else,
`suppose nothing else is there and you can see
`nothing else, you would say that it is part of
`the discharge line, production discharge line,
`branch, line.
` Q. And then that terminates at collet
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 15
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 252
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`body 22; is that right?
` A. Line 20 does, yes.
` Q. And now what is line 24?
` A. Line 24 is part of the production
`discharge line.
` Q. Now, on line 24, column 2 --
` A. May I review my declaration just for
`a minute? I want to make sure I'm being
`consistent. Yes, okay.
` Q. If you could pick up actually
`again --
` A. Yes.
` Q. -- column 2, line 24. This says,
`"Line 20 connects from the well production
`string to production flowline body or collet
`body 22." Do you see that?
` A. Yes.
` Q. I want to focus you in on those 5
`words, "flowline body or collet body." So in
`that line Kelly is referring to the collet body
`as also a flowline body; is that right?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. He refers to it as a production
`flowline body.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 16
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 253
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` Q. Production flowline body?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Why is that?
` A. I don't know what that is.
` Q. You don't know what a production
`flowline body is?
` A. No, I don't know what that is. I
`bet if you ask somebody in the art what a
`production flowline body is he would shrug his
`shoulders and would say I don't know what he's
`talking about. It is not a commonly used word.
` Q. Is it, is it Kelly's attempt to
`indicate that production flowline bodies
`connected to a flowline?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection, form.
` A. I don't know what Kelly's intent
`was. I don't know why he used that word.
` Q. But it must have something to do
`with the flowline, shouldn't it?
` A. I don't know.
` Q. You don't know. So you have no
`opinion as to what production flowline body is;
`is that correct?
` A. I don't really know. If somebody
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 17
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 254
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`asked me --
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection.
` A. -- what a production flowline body
`was, I wouldn't have a clue. It could be a lot
`of things. I know the words, I know what they
`mean. And I can conjure a bunch of things that
`it could be, what you would call a production
`flowline body, but it is not a phrase that you
`would see commonly.
` Q. So just to reiterate, you have no
`understanding of what a production flowline
`body is; right?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. Because he, he equates it to a
`collet body. I know what he's trying to,
`trying to say, but I wouldn't call it a
`production flowline body. I don't know what
`that means.
` Q. Let's go back to Figure 1. You have
`described what the tree body is. Now, there
`are tree guides, wing valve tree guide, T
`block, what would you call that infrastructure
`or that structure?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 18
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 255
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` Q. It isn't part of the tree body;
`right?
` MR. WINTERLE: Same objection.
` A. You said two things, tree guides and
`what was the other one?
` Q. So you have identified the tree body
`in Figure 1; right?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And then next to the tree body you
`have got a wing valve, you have got a T block,
`you have got other structures. What would that
`be considered part of?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection, form.
` A. What other structures?
` Q. Wing valve and T block?
` A. They're part of the tree assembly.
` Q. Tree assembly. So where does the
`tree assembly end in Figure 1? Let me start
`this way. Does the tree assembly include the
`tree body?
` A. Yes, it does.
` Q. What else does the tree assembly
`include in Figure 1?
` A. Tree assembly is generally
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 19
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 256
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`everything that you would run to land on the
`wellheads. So it would include the tree body,
`it would include the choke, it would include
`the hub outlet, production hub outlet.
` Q. So I'm speaking specifically with
`Figure 1. So what elements of Figure 1 would
`you consider to be the tree assembly?
` A. 10, so that would include 10, 18,
`26, 28, 22, 24, everything in between and part
`of 22 that is not shown. It would include
`that, that hub looking up, that hub connection
`includes the connector, of course, but that is
`bolted to the tree. It would include the tree
`cap, maybe not, tree cap is debatable.
` Q. The tree cap is debatable?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Why is that?
` A. You run it on two or three tree caps
`off of it, probably not.
` Q. So the tree cap is not landed on the
`wellhead?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. No, the tree cap is not landed on
`the wellhead.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 20
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 257
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` Q. And is the choke landed on the
`wellhead?
` A. No, the choke is not landed on the
`wellhead.
` Q. But you are still calling the choke
`part of the tree assembly?
` A. Yes, the choke is part of the tree
`assembly.
` Q. But you could remove the choke. I
`mean the whole purpose behind Kelly is a
`retrievable choke; is that right?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. I can remove a choke, yes, I can
`remove the Kelly choke.
` Q. Where does the flowline begin?
` A. The flowline?
` Q. In Figure 1, yes.
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. The flowline is not shown in Figure
`1.
` Q. Well, the production discharge line
`directly communicates with the flowline; right?
` A. Yes, eventually.
` Q. Well, wouldn't you then call the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 21
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 258
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`production discharge line the flowline?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. No, the flowline means something
`else to somebody skilled in the art.
` Q. But you made it very clear
`yesterday, sir, that if something is in fluid
`communication with something else, it likewise
`can be called that other thing?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection.
` Q. So in this situation isn't the
`production discharge line --
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection,
` mischaracterizes prior testimony.
` Q. -- in fluid communication with the
`production flowline?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection,
` mischaracterizes prior communication.
` A. The discharge line --
` MR. KIKLIS: Excuse me, one word
` objections is all you get.
` MR. WINTERLE: I disagree.
` MR. KIKLIS: Look at the trial
` guide.
` MR. WINTERLE: I did.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 22
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 259
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` MR. KIKLIS: It is one word
` objections. And if you sit here and try to
` coach the witness, then we're going to call
` the board and we will read your objections
` to the board. Got it?
` MR. WINTERLE: I understand.
` Q. Now, sir, my question to you,
`Mr. Herrmann, is the production discharge line
`is in fluid communication with the flowline;
`right?
` A. It is.
` Q. Would you call that direct
`communication with the flowline?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. It is in direct communication --
`well, no, it is not, I'm sorry, not necessarily
`in direct communication with the flowline.
` Q. Why not?
` A. Well, it can go through a manifold
`and commingle with some other wells. The
`flowline would be in direct communication with
`the manifold.
` Q. But if there were a single -- if
`there were not a manifold and line 24 were
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 23
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 260
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`communicating directly to the production
`facility, then in that case line 24 would be
`considered a flowline; right?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. Well, no, it would be considered
`the, the production outlet from the tree
`assembly and the flowline connects to it.
` Q. In that situation the production
`discharge line would communicate directly with
`the flowline?
` A. In that situation where there was no
`other wells and there was only -- no manifold,
`and this, yes, it would communicate directly
`with the flowline.
` Q. One of ordinary skill in the art,
`therefore, could consider any part along the
`production discharge line part of the flowline;
`right?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. No. In fact, anybody skilled in the
`art would not consider that part of the
`flowline. The flowline means something special
`to somebody skilled in the art.
` Q. And what does that mean?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 24
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 261
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` A. It is the line that conveys the
`production to the production facility.
` Q. So everything on Figure 1, in your
`opinion, is part of what is known as a tree
`assembly?
` A. No.
` Q. What on Figure 1 is not part of tree
`assembly?
` A. Well, the wellhead, the guidepost,
`the guide frame, probably the tree cap is
`arguably that is not part of the tree assembly.
` Q. The guideposts are not considered
`part of the tree assembly?
` A. No.
` Q. Why is that?
` A. They're on a separate frame that is
`run on the wellhead. As I explained yesterday,
`the guideposts are used to orient the BOP
`stack. They're there. They don't have
`anything to do with the -- they were there when
`the well was drilled. They're remnant of some
`other operation.
` Q. So the tree guides, I believe 14 is
`that one of the tree guides? They're the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 25
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 262
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`vertical columns depicted on the -- actually,
`let's look at Figure 2. Could you mark in red
`-- you can use this red pen where the tree
`guides are. Does Figure 2 depict the tree
`guides?
` A. It shows the guideposts, yes.
` Q. The guideposts. Can you circle the
`guideposts in Figure 2 of Kelly?
` A. Okay.
` Q. Could you mark all four guideposts?
` A. (Witness complies.)
` Q. So now, you have marked the four
`guideposts in Figure 2; right? Is that
`correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Now, when the tree body is lowered
`to the wellhead, is it lowered with the
`guideposts or not?
` A. No guideposts are there.
` Q. Then the tree body is lowered inside
`the guideposts?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. I will explain in Figure 1.
` Q. Yes.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 26
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 263
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` A. There is some funnels. The funnels
`are long. Those are the guide funnels and
`they're attached to a connector which is
`attached to the tree. And they capture -- the
`guidepost captures the funnels and then they
`will be able to land.
` Q. Now, on Figure 2 there seems to be
`cross-sectional support between the guideposts,
`doesn't there?
` A. Yes, that is shown in Figure 1. It
`is shown a little better in Figure 1.
` Q. What is the cross-sectional support
`used for?
` A. Have you got something I can mark?
`I'm going to use your words, it isn't what we
`would use.
` Q. What would you call it?
` A. Part of the guide frame, but I will
`put that guide frame support.
` Q. But in Figure 2 it shows that there
`is not only -- well, there is diagonal support,
`do you see that?
` A. Figure 2. Yes, that is what I
`marked in Figure 1.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 27
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 264
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
` Q. Figure 2?
` A. Yes, that is what I just --
` Q. Diagonal support?
` A. Yes.
` Q. That is lowered with the guideposts,
`too?
` A. No, that is on the tree.
` Q. That is on the --
` A. That is connected to the connector,
`I said that.
` Q. So the guideposts and the guideposts
`supports including the guidepost diagonal
`supports are all already on the wellhead?
` A. No, they would be part -- this is
`what we did in the '80s. The guide frame would
`be part of the tree assembly.
` Q. So the guide frame is part of the
`tree assembly?
` A. Uh-huh.
` Q. But it is not lowered with the tree
`body?
` A. Yes.
` Q. Right?
` A. It is lowered with the tree. It is
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 28
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 265
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`connected -- the guide frame is connected to
`the connector and that is connected to the tree
`body. It is all together, the way this one
`shows. Sometimes you can have retrievable
`guide frames, but this one shows the permanent
`guide frame connected to the tree.
` Q. So in Kelly the tree guide frame is
`part of the tree assembly?
` A. Yes.
` Q. And it is lowered when the tree body
`is -- it is lowered with the tree body when it
`is being installed in the wellhead?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` A. It is all part of the tree assembly
`and the tree body is part of the tree assembly.
`It is all run together onto the wellhead.
` Q. This Figure 2 looks like the tree
`guides and supports and the tree body are all
`interconnected?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` Q. Right?
` A. No, they're not. There is clearance
`between the funnel and the post. You were
`probably trying to say something else that was
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 29
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 266
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`right, but the way you said it is wrong.
` Q. What was -- then tell me what I
`should have said?
` A. The posts are connected permanently
`to the wellhead on a guide frame. It is
`connected permanently to the wellhead, so you
`kind of do that all together with the guide
`frame and the guideposts and it is on the
`wellhead, the posts are.
` Q. Posts are on the wellhead?
` A. Yes, yes.
` Q. What part of Figure 1 are the
`guideposts?
` A. You see down here these are the
`guideposts, I've already marked that. This is
`the connection to the wellhead, the guidepost
`connection to the wellhead.
` Q. What is the part that lands on top
`of the wellhead?
` MR. WINTERLE: Objection to form.
` Q. Everything above that?
` A. The connector lands on to the
`wellhead, and then these funnels are connected
`to the connector. So here are the posts -- I
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 30
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 267
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`just -- we will do one, here is the funnel. So
`if the post is setting there I'm trying to find
`it with the wire I find it and I land it, so
`this is the funnel. This is the post, so this
`is the post. This is the funnel that part
`here.
` Q. Where is the funnel?
` A. This part here. So it slides on to
`the post.
` Q. Could you -- could you mark with
`brackets what the funnel is that lands so
`everything from that line above?
` A. This is going back to the '80s, so I
`hope I'm getting it right.
` Q. I'm trying to get at what Kelly
`does. Is that the way Kelly would be
`installed?
` A. Kelly shows a guide, a guide
`frame --
` Q. Everything --
` A. -- guideline stack.
` Q. So everything --
` A. The guideline tree.
` Q. So everything from the post funnel
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580
`
`OSS Exhibit 2005, pg. 31
`FMC vs. OSS
`IPR2016-00467
`
`

`
`Page 268
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
` HERRMANN VOLUME 2 - 08/23/16
`above is

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket