throbber
United States Patent [19]
`Cabilly et a1.
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`4,816,567
`Mar. 28, 1989
`
`[54] RECOMBINANT I1VIMUNOGLOBIN
`PREPARATIONS
`[75] Inventors: Shmuel Cabilly, Monrovia; Herbert
`L. Heyneker, Burlingame; William E.
`Holmes, Paci?ca; Arthur D. Riggs,
`La Verne; Ronald B. Wetzel, San
`Francisco, all of Calif.
`Genentech, Inc., South San
`Francisco, Calif.
`[21] Appl. NO.: 483,457
`[22] Filed:
`Apr. 8, 1983
`
`[73] Assignee:
`
`C07K 15/14; C07K 15/06;
`[51] Int. Cl.4 ................
`C12P 21/00; C12N 15/00; C12N 1/20
`[52] US. Cl. .................................... .. 530/387; 435/68;
`435/172.3; 435/320; 435/252.3; 435/252.3l;
`435/252.33; 435/252.34; 935/10; 935/15;
`935/29; 935/73; 530/388
`[58] Field of Search .................... .. 435/68, 172.3, 240,
`435/253, 172.2, 317, 320; 260/112 B; 536/27;
`935/11, 15, 27, 29, 73; 530/387, 388
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`[56]
`
`4,444,878 4/ 1984 Paulus ............................... .. 435/ 188
`4,512,922 4/ 1985 Jones et a1.
`435/68 X
`
`4,518,584 5/1985 Mark et a1. . . . . .
`. . . . . .. 435/172.3
`4,704,362 11/1987 Itakura et a1. ............. .. 435/172.3 X
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0057107 8/1982 European Pat. Off. .
`0073656 8/ 1982 European Pat. Off. ....... .. 435/ 172.3
`0068763 I/ 1983 European Pat. Off. .
`0120694 10/1984 European Pat. Off. .
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`Dolby, T. W. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, vol. 77, (10)
`pp. 6027-6031, 1980.
`Rice, D. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. vol. 79 pp.
`7862-7865, 1982.
`Accolla, R. S. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, vol. 77, (1)
`pp. 563-566, 1980.
`Raso, V. et al., Cancer Res., vol. 41, pp. 2073-2078,
`1981.
`
`Nisonoff, A. et al., Arch. Biochem. Biophys., vol. 93, pp.
`460-462, 1960.
`Glennie, M. J. et al., Nature, vol. 295, pp. 712-714, 1982.
`Eisen, H. N., lmmunologv, Harper & Row, Publishers,
`pp. 415 and 428-436, 1974.
`Hozumi, N. et a1. Nuc Acids Res. vol. 5(6) pp.
`1779-1799, Chem. Abst. 89:87928t, 1978.
`Wetzel, R. et a1. Gene, vol. 16, pp. 63-71, 1981.
`Williams et al., Science, vol. 215, pp. 687-689, 1982.
`Falkner, F. G. et al., Nature, vol. 298, pp. 286-288,
`1982.
`Boss et a1. Hamer et al., Ed. “Gene Expressions-Proc.
`Cetus-UCLA Symposium .
`.
`. Mar. 26-Apr. 1, 1983”
`pp. 513-522.
`Amster et al., “Nucleic Acid Research” 8(9): 2055-2065
`(1980).
`DeBoer et al., Rodriguez et al., Ed. “Promoters”
`462-481 (1982).
`Gough, “Tibs” 6(8): 203-205 (Aug. 1981).
`Morrison, “J. of Immunology” 123(2): 793-800 (Aug.
`1979).
`Kohler “P.N.A.S. USA” 77(4): 2197-2199 (Apr. 1980).
`Thomas M. Roberts, Promoters, Rodriguez et al., Eds.
`(1982), pp. 452-461.
`Kemp et al., “Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA” 78(7):
`4520-4524 (Jul. 1981).
`Valle et al., “Nature” 300:71-74 (4 Nov. 1982).
`Microbiology 3rd ed., Harper Int. Ed. 338-379 (1980).
`Hitzeman et al. Science 219: 620-625 (1983).
`Mercereau-Puijalon et al., in “Expression of Eukary
`otic Viral and Cellular Genes” Pettersson et a1. (ED)
`295-303 (1981) Academic Pr.
`Primary Examiner—Jayrne Huleatt
`(List continued on next page.)
`ABSTRACT‘
`[57]
`Altered and native immunoglobulins, including con
`stant-variable region chimeras, are prepared in recombi
`nant cell culture. The immunoglobulins contain variable
`regions which are immunologically capable of binding
`predetermined antigens. Methods are provided for re
`folding directly expressed immunoglobulins into immu
`nologically active form.
`
`7 Claims, 15 Drawing Sheets
`
`164
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1007, pg 164
`
`

`
`4,816,567
`Page 2
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Keshet et a1. Nucleic Acids Res. 9(1): 19-30 (1981).
`Taniguchi et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 77(9):
`5230-5233 (1980).
`Ohsuye et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 11(5): 1283-1295
`(1983).
`
`Kadonaga et al., J. Biol. Chem. 259(4): 2149-2154
`(1984).
`Maniatis, T. “Molecular Cloning” p. 433 (Sep. 1985).
`Fujisawa Y. et a1. .“Nucleic Acids Res.” 11(11):
`3581-3591 (1983).
`Roberts, T. M. in “Promoters Structures and Function”
`Rodriguez, R. L. (ED.) 452-461 (1982).
`
`165
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1007, pg 165
`
`

`
`U S Patent Mar. 28, 1989
`
`Sheet 1 of4
`
`4,816,567
`
`166
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1007, pg 166
`
`

`
`US. Patent Mar. 28, 1989
`
`Sheet 2 0M
`
`4,816,567
`
`w
`
`167
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1007, pg 167
`
`

`
`US. Patent Mar. 28, 1989
`
`Sheet 3 01'4
`
`4,816,567
`
`168
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1007, pg 168
`
`

`
`US. Patent Mar. 28, 1989
`
`Sheet 4 0f 4
`
`4,816,567
`
`0.30pg onli-CEA
`LOOug on’ri-CEA
`K cells (lOpl)
`wcells (lOul)
`K7 cells (lOpl)
`RW57-K3000
`RW57—K3000
`
`
`
`3:32} K7, cells (20m)
`
`‘ Kcells (20w)
`
`Fig. 9.
`
`169
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1007, pg 169
`
`

`
`1
`
`RECOMBINANT IMMUNOGLOBIN
`PREPARATIONS
`
`4,816,567
`
`2
`The hybrids thus formed are segregated into single
`genetic strains by selection, dilution, and regrowth, and
`each strain thus represents a single genetic line. They
`therefore produce immunoreactive antibodies against a
`desired antigen which are assured to be homogenous,
`and which antibodies, referencing their pure genetic
`parentage, are called “monoclonal”. Hybridoma tech
`nology has to this time been focused largely on the
`fusion of murine lines, but human-human hybridomas
`(Olsson, L. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 77: 5429
`(1980)); human-murine hybridomas (Schlom, J., et al.
`(ibid) 77: 6841 (1980)) and several other xenogenic hy
`brid combinations have been prepared as well. Alterna
`tively, primary, antibody producing, B cells have been
`immortalized in vitro by transformation with viral
`DNA.
`Polyclonal, or, much more preferably, monoclonal,
`antibodies have a variety of useful properties similar to
`those of the present invention. For example, they can be
`used as speci?c immunoprecipitating reagents to detect
`the presence of the antigen which elicited the initial
`processing of the B cell genome by coupling this anti
`gen-antibody reaction with suitable detection tech
`niques such as labeling with radioisotopes or with en
`zymes capable of assay (RIA, EMIT, and ELISA).
`Antibodies are thus the foundation of immuno diagnos
`tic tests for many antigenic substances. In another im
`portant use, antibodies can be directly injected into
`subjects suffering from an attack by a substance or or
`ganism containing the antigen in question to combat this
`attack. This process is currently in its experimental
`stages, but its potential is clearly seen. Third, whole
`body diagnosis and treatment is made possible because
`injected antibodies are directed to speci?c target disease
`tissues, and thus can be used either to determine the
`presence of the disease by carrying with them a suitable
`label, or to attack the diseased tissue by carrying a suit
`able drug.
`Monoclonal antibodies produced by hybridomas,
`while theoretically effective as suggested above and
`clearly preferable to polyclonal antibodies because of
`their speci?city, suffer from certain disadvantages.
`First, they tend to be contaminated with other proteins
`and cellular materials of hybridoma, (and, therefore,
`mammalian) origin. Second, hybridoma lines producing
`monoclonal antibodies tend to be unstable and may alter
`the structure of antibody produced or stop producing
`antibody altogether (Kohler, G., et al., Proc. Antl. Acad.
`Sci (USA) 77: 2197 (1980); Morrison, S. L., J. Immunol.
`123: 793 (1979)). The cell line genome appears to alter
`itself in response to stimuli whose nature is not cur
`rently known, and this alteration may result in produc
`tion of incorrect sequences. Third, both hybridoma and
`B cells inevitably produce certain antibodies in glycosy
`lated form (Melchers, F., Biochemistry, 10: 653 (1971))
`which, under some circumstances, may be undesirable.
`Fourth, production of both monoclonal and polyclonal
`antibodies is relatively expensive. Fifth, and perhaps
`most important, production by current techniques (ei
`ther by hybridoma or by B cell response) does not per
`mit manipulation of the genome so as to produce anti
`bodies with more effective design components than
`those normally elicited in response to antigens from the
`mature B cell in situ. The antibodies of the present in
`vention do not suffer from the foregoing drawbacks,
`and, furthermore, offer the opportunity to provide mol
`ecules of superior design.
`
`5
`
`35
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`This invention relates to the ?eld of immunoglobulin
`production and to modi?cation of naturally occuring
`immunoglobulin amino acid sequences. Speci?cally, the
`invention relates to using recombinant techniques to
`produce both immunoglobulins which are analogous to
`those normally found in vertebrate systems and to take
`advantage of these gene modi?cation techniques to
`construct chimeric or other modi?ed forms.
`A. Immunoglobulins and Antibodies
`Antibodies are speci?c immunoglobulin polypeptides
`produced by the vertebrate immune system in response
`to challenge by foreign proteins glycoproteins, cells, or
`other antigenic foreign substances. The sequence of
`events which permits the organism to overcome inva
`sion by foreign cells or to rid the system of foreign
`substances is at least partially understood. An important
`part of this process is the manufacture of antibodies
`which bind speci?cally to a particular foreign sub
`stance. The binding speci?city of such polypeptides to a
`particular antigen is highly re?ned, and the multitude of
`speci?cities capable of being generated by the individ
`ual vertebrate is remarkable in its complexity and vari
`ability. Thousands of antigens are capable of eliciting
`responses, each almost exclusively directed to the par
`ticular antigen which elicted it.
`Immunoglobulins include both antibodies, as above
`described, and analogous protein substances which lack
`antigen speci?city. The latter are produced at low lev
`els by the lymph system and in increased levels by mye
`lomas.
`A.1 Source and Utility
`Two major sources of vertebrate antibodies are pres
`ently utilized-generation in situ by the mammalian B
`lymphocytes and in cell culture by B-cell hybrids. Anti
`bodies are made in situ as a result of the differentiation
`of immature B lymphocytes into plasma cells, which
`occurs in response to stimulation by speci?c antigens. In
`the undifferentiated B cell, the portions of DNA coding
`for the various regions on the immunoglobulin chains
`are separated in the genomic DNA. The sequences are
`reassembled sequentially prior to transcription. A re
`view of this process has been given by Gough, Trends in
`Biochem Sci, 6: 203 (1981). The resulting rearranged
`genome is capable of expression in the mature‘B lym
`phocyte to produce the desired antibody. Even when
`only a single antigen is introduced into the sphere of the
`immune system for a particular mammal, however, a
`uniform population of antibodies does not result. The in
`situ immune response to any particular antigen is de
`?ned by the mosaic of responses to the various determi
`nants which are present on the antigen. Each subset of
`homologous antibody is contributed by a single popula
`tion of B cells-—hence in situ generation of antibodies is
`“polyclonal”.
`'
`This limited but inherent heterogeneity has been
`overcome in numerous particular cases by use of hy
`bridoma technology to create “monoclonal” antibodies
`(Kohler, et al., Eur. J. ImmunoL, 6: 511 (1976)). In this
`process, splenocytes or lymphocytes from a mammal
`which has been injected with antigen are fused with a
`65
`tumor cell line, thus producing hybrid cells or “hy
`bridomas” which are both immortal and capable of
`producing the genetically coded antibody of the B cell.
`
`45
`
`55
`
`170
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1007, pg 170
`
`

`
`4,816,567
`3
`4
`Even those immunoglobulins which lack the speci?c
`Structural Concepts in Immunology and Immunochemis
`ity of atibodies are useful, although over a smaller spec
`try, 2nd Ed., p. 413-436, Holt, Rinehart, Winston
`trum of potential uses than the antibodies themselves. In
`(1976)), and other cellular responses (Andrews, D. W.,
`presently understood applications, such immunoglobu
`et al., Clinical Immunobiology, pp l-l8, W. B. Sanders
`lins are helpful in protein replacement therapy for glob
`(1980); Kohl, S., et al., Immunology, 48: 187 (1983));
`ulin related anemia. In this context, an inability to bind
`while the variable region determines the antigen with
`to antigen is in fact helpful, as the therapeutic value of
`which it will react.
`these proteins would be impaired by such functionality.
`B. Recombinant DNA Technology
`At present, such non-speci?c antibodies are derivable in
`Recombinant DNA technology has reach suf?cient
`quantity only from myeloma cell cultures suitably in
`sophistication that it includes a repertoire of techniques
`duced. The present invention offers an alternative, more
`for cloning and expression of gene sequences. Various
`economical source. It also offers the opportunity of
`DNA sequences can be recombined with some facility,
`cancelling out speci?city by manipulating the four
`creating new DNA entities capable of producing heter
`chains of the tetramer separately.
`ologous protein product in transformed microbes and
`A.2 General Structure Characteristics
`cell cultures. The general means and methods for the in
`The basic immunoglobin structural unit in vertebrate
`vitro ligation of various blunt ended or “sticky” ended
`systems is now well understood (Edelman, G. M., Ann.
`fragments of DNA, for producing expression vectors,
`N. I’. Acad. Sci, 190: 5 (1971)). The units are composed
`and for transforming organisms are now in hand.
`to two identical light polypeptide chains of molecular
`DNA recombination of the essential elements (i.e., an
`weight approximately 23,000 daltons, and two identical
`origin of replication, one or more phenotypic selection
`heavy chains of molecular weight 53,000-70,000. The
`characteristics, expression control sequence, heterolo
`four chains are joined by disul?de bonds in a “Y” con
`gous gene insert and remainder vector) generally is
`?guration wherein the light chains bracket the heavy
`performed outside the host cell. The resulting recombi
`chains starting at the mouth of the Y and continuing
`nant replicable expression vector, or plasmid, is intro
`through the divergent region as shown in FIG. 1. The
`duced into cells by transformation and large quantities
`“branch” portion, as there indicated, is designated the
`of the recombinant vehicle is obtained by growing the
`Fab region. Heavy chains are classi?ed as gamma, mu,
`transformant. Where the gene is properly inserted with
`alpha, delta, or epsilon, with some subclasses among
`reference to portions which govern the transcription
`them, and the nature of this chain, as it has a long con
`and translation of the encoded DNA message, the re
`stant region, determines the “class” of the antibody as
`sulting expression vector is useful to produce the poly
`IgG, IgM, IgA, IgD, or IgE. Light chains are classi?ed
`peptide sequence for which the inserted gene codes, a
`as either kappa or lambda. Each heavy chain class can
`process referred to as “expression.” The resulting prod
`be prepared with either kappa or lambda light chain.
`uct may be obtained by lysis, if necessary, of the host
`The light and heavy chains are covalently bonded to
`cell and recovery of the product by appropriate purifi
`each other, and the “tail” portions of the two heavy
`cations from other proteins.
`chains are bonded to each other by covalent disul?de
`In practice, the use of recombinant DNA technology
`linkages when the immunoglobulins are generated ei
`can express entirely heterologous polypeptides-so
`ther by hybridomas or by B cells. However, if non
`called direct expression—or alternatively may express a
`covalent association of the chains can be effected in the
`heterologous polypeptide fused to a portion of the
`correct geometry, the aggregate will still be capable of
`amino acid sequence of a homologous polypeptide. In
`40
`reaction with antigen, or of utility as a protein supple
`the latter cases, the intended bioactive product is some
`ment as a non-speci?c immunoglobulin.
`times rendered bioinactive within the fused, homolo
`The amino acid sequence runs from the N-terminal
`gous/heterologous polypeptide until it is cleaved in an
`end at the top of the Y to the C-terminal end at the
`extracellular environment.
`bottom of each chain. At the N-terminal end is a vari
`The art of maintaining cell or tissue cultures as well as
`able region which is speci?c for the antigen which elic
`microbial systems for studying genetics and cell physi
`ited it, and is approximately 100 amino acids in length,
`ology is well established. Means and methods are avail
`there being slight variations between light and heavy
`able for maintaining permanent cell lines, prepared by
`chain and from antibody to antibody. The variable re~
`successive serial transfers from isolated cells. For use in
`gion is linked in each chain to a constant region which
`research, such cell lines are maintained on a solid sup
`extends the remaining length of the chain. Linkage is
`port in liquid medium, or by growth in suspension con
`seen, at the genomic level, as occuring through a linking
`taining support nutriments. Scale-up for large prepara
`sequence known currently as the “J” region in the light
`tions seems to pose only mechanical problems.
`chain gene, which encodes about 12 amino acids, and as
`a combination of “D” region and “J” region in the
`heavy chain gene, which together encode approxi
`mately 25 amino acids.
`The remaining portions of the chain are referred to as
`constant regions and within a particular class do not to
`vary with the speci?city of the antibody (i.e., the anti
`gen eliciting it).
`As stated above, there are five known major classes
`of constant regions which determine the class of the
`immunoglobulin molecule (IgG, IgM, IgA, IgD, and
`IgE corresponding to y, u, a, 8, and 6 heavy chain
`constant regions). The constant region or class deter
`mines subsequent effector function of the antibody,
`including activation of complement (Kabat, E. A.,
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`The invention relates to antibodies and to non
`speci?c immunoglobulins (NSIs) formed by recombi
`nant techniques using suitable host cell cultures. These
`antibodies and NSIs can be readily prepared in pure
`“monoclonal” form. They can be manipulated at the
`genomic level to produce chimeras of variants which
`draw their homology from species which differ from
`each other. They can also be manipulated at the protein
`level, since all four chains do not need to be produced
`by the same cell. Thus, there are a number of “types” of
`immunoglobulins encompassed by the invention.
`First, immunoglobulins, particularly antibodies, are
`produced using recombinant techniques which mimic
`
`15
`
`45
`
`171
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1007, pg 171
`
`

`
`4,816,567
`5
`the amino acid sequence of naturally occuring antibod
`ies produced by either mammalian B cells in situ, or by
`B cells fused with suitable immortalizing tumor lines,
`i.e., hybridomas. Second, the methods of this invention
`produced, and the invention is directed to, immuno
`globulins which comprise polypeptides not hitherto
`found associated with each other in nature. Such reas
`sembly is particularly useful in producing “hybrid”
`antibodies capable of binding more than one antigen;
`and in producing “composite” immunoglobuins
`wherein heavy and light chains of different origins es
`sentially damp out speci?city. Third, by genetic manip
`ulation, “chimeric” antibodies can be formed wherein,
`for example, the variable regions, correspond to the
`amino acid sequence from one mammalian model sys
`tem, whereas the constant region mimics the amino acid
`sequence of another. Again, the derivation of these two
`mimicked sequences may be from different species.
`Fourth, also by genetic manipulation, “altered” anti
`bodies with improved speci?city and other characteris
`tics can be formed.
`Two other types of immunoglobulin-like moieties
`may be produced: “univalent” antibodies, which are
`useful as homing carriers to target tissues, and “Fab
`proteins” which include only the “Fab” region of an
`immunoglobulin molecule i.e, the branches of the “Y”.
`These univalent antibodies and Fab fragments may also
`be “mammalian” i.e., mimic mammalian amino acid
`sequences; novel assemblies of mammalian chains, or
`chimeric, where for example, the constant and variable
`sequence patterns may be of different origin. Finally,
`either the light chain or heavy chain alone, or portions
`thereof, produced by recombinant techniques are in
`cluded in the invention and may be mammalian or chi
`meric.
`In other aspects, the invention is directed to DNA
`which encodes the aforementioned NSIs, antibodies,
`and. portions thereof, as well as expression vectors or
`plasmids capable of effecting the production of such
`immunoglobulins in suitable host cells. It includes the
`host cells and cell cultures which result from transfor
`mation with these vectors. Finally, the invention is
`directed to methods of producing these NSIs and anti
`bodies, and the DNA sequences, plasmids, and trans
`formed cells intermediate to them.
`
`6
`FIG. 9 shows the results of western blots of extracts
`of cells transformed as those in FIGS. 8.
`FIG. 10 shows a standard curve for ELISA assay of
`anti CEA activity.
`FIGS. 11 and 12 show the construction of a plasmid
`for expression of the gene encoding a chimeric heavy
`chain.
`FIG. 13 shows the construction of a plasmid for ex
`pression of the gene encoding the Fab region of heavy
`chain.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`A. De?nitions
`As used herein, “antibodies” refers to tetramers or
`aggregates thereof which have speci?c immunoreactive
`activity, comprising light and heavy chains usually
`aggregated in the “Y” con?guration of FIG. 1, with or
`without covalent linkage between them; “immunoglob
`ulins” refers to such assemblies whether or not speci?c
`immunoreactive activity is a property. “Non-speci?c
`immunoglobulin” (“NSI”) means those immunoglobu
`lins which do not possess speci?city—i.e., those which
`are not antibodies.
`“Mammalian antibodies” refers to antibodies wherein
`the amino acid sequences of the chains are homologous
`with those sequences found in antibodies produced by
`mammalian systems, either in situ, or in hybridomas.
`These antibodies antibodies mimic antibodies which are
`otherwise capable of being generated, although in im
`pure form, in these traditional systems.
`“Hybrid antibodies” refers to antibodies wherein
`chains are separately homologous with reference mam
`malian antibody chains and represent novel assemblies
`of them, so that two different antigens are precipitable
`by the tetramer. In hybrid antibodies, one pair of heavy
`and light chain is homologous to antibodies raised
`against one antigen, while the other pair of heavy and
`light chain is homologous to those raised against an
`other antigen. This results in the property of “diva
`lence” i.e., ability to bind two antigens simultaneously.
`Such hybrids may, of course, also be formed using chi
`meric chains, as set forth below.
`“Composite” immunoglobulins means those wherein
`the heavy and light chains mimic those of different
`species origins or speci?cities, and the resultant is thus
`likely to be a non-speci?c immunoglobulin (NSI), i.e.-—~
`lacking in antibody character.
`“Chimeric antibodies” refers to those antibodies
`wherein one portion of each of the amino acid sequen
`ces of heavy and light chains is homologous to corre
`sponding sequences in antibodies derived from a partic
`ular species or belonging to a particular class, while the
`remaining segment of the chains is homologous to cor
`responding sequences in another. Typically, in these
`chimeric antibodies, the variable region of both light
`and heavy chains mimics the variable regions of anti
`bodies derived from one species of mammals, while the
`constant portions are homologous to the sequences in
`antibodies derived from another. One clear advantage
`to such chimeric forms is that, for example, the variable
`regions can conveniently be derived from presently
`known sources using readily available hybridomas or B
`cells from non human host organisms in combination
`with constant regions derived from, for example,
`human cell preparations. While the variable region has
`the advantage of ease of preparation, and the speci?city
`is not affected by its source, the constant region being
`human, is less likely to elicit an immune response from
`
`30
`
`45
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`FIG. 1 is a representation of the general structure of
`immunoglobulins.
`FIG. 2A and 2B show the detailed sequence of the
`cDNA insert of pKl7G4 which encodes kappa anti
`CEA chain.
`FIG. 3 shows the coding sequence of the fragment
`shown in FIG. 2, along with the corresponding amino
`acid sequence.
`FIGS. 4A, 4B and 4C show the combined detailed
`sequence of the cDNA inserts of p'y298 and p711 which
`encode gamma anti CEA chain.
`FIGS. 5A and 5B show the corresponding amino acid
`sequence encoded by the fragment in FIG. 4.
`FIGS. 6 and 7 outline the construction of expression
`vectors for kappa and gamma anti-CEA chains respec
`tively.
`FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 8C show the results of sizing gels
`run on extracts of E. coli expressing the genes for
`gamma chain, kappa chain, and both kappa and gamma
`chains respectively.
`
`55
`
`172
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1007, pg 172
`
`

`
`4,816,567
`7
`8
`a human subject when the antibodies are injected than
`the “effector” Fc portion they cannot effect, for exam
`ple, lysis of the target cell by macrophages.
`would the constant region from a non-human source.
`However, the de?nition is not limited to this particu
`“Fab protein” has similar subsets according to the
`lar example. It includes any antibody in which either or
`de?nition of the present invention as does the general
`both of the heavy or light chains are composed of com
`term “antibodies” or “immunoglobulins”. Thus, “mam
`binations of sequences mimicking the sequences in anti
`malian” Fab protein, “hybrid” Fab protein “chimeric”
`bodies of different sources, whether these sources be
`Fab and “altered” Fab protein are de?ned analogously
`differing classes, differing antigen respones, or differing
`to the corresponding de?nitions set forth in the previ
`species of origin and whether or not the fusion point is
`ous paragraphs for the various types of antibodies.
`at the variable/ constant boundary. Thus, it is possible to
`Individual heavy or light chains may of course be
`produce antibodies in which neither the constant nor
`“mammalian”, “chimeric” or “altered” in accordance
`the variable region mimic known antibody sequences. It
`with the above. As will become apparent from the de
`then becomes possible, for example, to construct anti
`tailed description of the invention, it is possible, using
`bodies whose variable region has a higher speci?c af?n
`the techniques disclosed to prepare other combinations
`ity for a particular antigen, or whose constant region
`of the four-peptide chain aggregates, besides those spe
`can elicit enhanced complement ?xation or to make
`ci?cally de?ned, such as hybrid antibodies containing
`other improvements in properties possessed by a partic
`chimeric light and mammalian heavy chains, hybrid
`ular constant region.
`Fab proteins containing chimeric Fab proteins of heavy
`“Altered antibodies” means antibodies wherein the
`chains associated with mammalian light chains, and so
`amino acid sequence has been varied from that of a
`forth.
`20
`mammalian or other vertebrate antibody. Because of
`“Expression vector” includes vectors which are ca
`the relevance of recombinant DNA techniques to this
`pable of expressing DNA sequences contained therein,
`invention, one need not be con?ned to the sequences of
`i.e., the coding sequences are operably linked to other
`amino acids found in natural antibodies; antibodies can
`sequences capable of effecting their expression. It is
`be redesigned to obtain desired characteristics. The
`implied, although not always explicitly stated, that
`25
`possible variations are many and range from the chang
`these expression vectors must be replicable in the host
`ing of just one or a few amino acids to the complete
`organisms either as episomes or as an integral part of the
`redesign of, for example, the constant region. Changes
`chromosomal DNA. Clearly a lack of replicability
`in the constant region will, in general, be made in order
`would render them effectively inoperable. A useful, but
`to improve the cellular process characteristics, such as
`not a necessary, element of an effective expression vec
`complement ?xation, interaction with membranes, and
`tor is a marker encoding sequence-Le. a sequence en
`other effector functions. Changes in the variable region
`coding a protein which results in a phenotypic property
`will be made in order to improve the antigen binding
`(e.g. tetracycline resistance) of the cells containing the
`characteristics. The antibody can also be engineered so
`protein which permits those cells to be readily identi
`as to aid the speci?c delivery of a toxic agent according
`?ed. In sum, “expression vector” is given a functional
`35
`to the “magic bullet” concept. Alterations, can be made
`de?nition, and any DNA sequence which is capable of
`by standard recombinant techniques and also by
`effecting expression of a speci?ed contained DNA code
`oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis techniques (Dal
`is included in this term, as it is applied to the speci?ed
`badie-McFarland, et al Prac. Natl. Acad. Sci.(USA),
`sequence. As at present, such vectors are frequently in
`79:64-09 (1982)).
`the form of plasmids, thus “plasmid” and “expression
`“Univalent antibodies” refers to aggregations which
`vector” are often used interchangeably. However, the
`comprise a heavy chain/light chain dimer bound to the
`invention is intended to include such other forms of
`Fc (or stem) region of a second heavy chain. Such anti
`expression vectors which serve equivalent functions
`bodies are speci?c for antigen, but have the additional
`and which may, from time to time become known in the
`desirable property of targeting tissues with speci?c
`art.
`antigenic surfaces, without causing its antigenic effec
`“Recombinant host cells” refers to cells which have
`tiveness to be impaired-Le, there is no antigenic mod
`been transformed with vectors constructed using re
`ulation. This phenomenon and the property of univalent
`combinant DNA techniques. As de?ned herein, the
`antibodies in this regard is set forth in Glennie, M. J ., et
`antibody or modi?cation thereof produced by a recom
`al., Nature, 295: 712 (1982). Univalent antibodies have
`binant host cell is by virtue of this transformation,
`heretofore been formed by proteolysis.
`rather than in such lesser amounts, or more commonly,
`“Fab” region refers to those portions of the chains
`in such less than detectable amounts, as would be pro
`which are roughly equivalent, or analogous, to the
`duced by the untransformed host.
`sequences which comprise the Y branch portions of the
`In descriptions of processes for isolation of antibodies
`heavy chain and to the light chain in its entirety, and
`from recombinant hosts, the terms “cell” and “cell cul
`which collectively (in aggregates) have been shown to
`ture” are used interchangeably to denote the source of
`exhibit antibody activity. “Fab protein”, which protein
`antibody unless it is clearly speci?ed otherwise. In other
`is one of the aspects of the invention, includes aggre
`words, recovery of antibody from the “cells" may mean
`gates of one heavy and one light chain (commonly
`either from spun down whole cells, or from the cell
`known as Fab’), as well as tetramers which correspond
`culture containing both the medium and the suspended
`to the two branch segments of the antibody Y, (com
`cells.
`monly known as F(ab)2), whether any of the above are
`B. Host Cell Cultures and Vectors
`covalently or non-covalently aggregated, so long as the
`The vectors and methods disclosed herein are suit
`aggregation is capable of selectively reacting with a
`able for use in host cells over a wide range of prokary
`particular antigen or antigen family. Fab antibodies
`otic and eukaryotic organisms.
`have, as have univalent ones, been formed heretofore by
`In general, of course, prokaryotes are preferred for
`proteolysis, and share the property of not eliciting anti
`cloning of DNA sequences in constructing the vectors
`gen modulation on target tissues. However, as they lack
`useful in the invention. For example, E. coli K12 strain
`
`45
`
`173
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1007, pg 173
`
`

`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`4,816,567
`9
`10
`294 (ATCC No. 31446) is particularly useful. Other
`sequen

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket