throbber
%*“>URNAL OF
`WOLECULAR
`AND APPLIED
`“ENETICS
`
`
`
`
`A4
`
`I.
`
`r‘
`I
`
`‘
`
`‘1x.y;_/._:\'_‘
`‘
`,-r’=
`cw ,
`'«
`'
`."~I
`
`,
`
`,
`
`'
`’
`
`RJ
`'
`
`.
`
`/OLUIVIF P1-|\|Ul\/IBEP Z1-198%?-PAVEN PPESS
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 62
`
`

`
`Journal of
`Molecular and Applied Genetics
`
`Editor-in-Chief:
`
`Howard M. Goodman, Ph.D.
`
`Depamnent of Molecular Biology
`Massachusetts General Hospital
`Boston, Massachusetts 02114, U.S.A.
`
`RECEIVED
`
`J01. 14 1982
`
`263
`
`273
`
`289
`
`301
`
`315
`
`Volume 1, Number 4, 1982 Blomedlul Llbflry ucsp I
`
`CONTENTS
`
`Genetic Evidence for Separate Functional Domains
`on the Human Adenovirus Specified, 72kd, DNA
`Binding Protein
`Daniel F. Klessig and Margaret P. Quinlan
`
`Regulation In Vivo of a Cloned Mammalian Gene:
`Cadmium Induces the Transcription of a Mouse
`Metallothionein Gene in SV40 Vectors
`Dean H. Hamer and MaryJane Walling
`
`Use of a lac Promoter-Operator Fragment as a
`Transcriptional Control Switch for Expression of
`the Constitutive lpp Gene in Escherichia coli
`Kenzo Nakamura, Yoshihiro Masui, and
`Masayori Inouye
`
`An Analysis of mRNAs for a Group of Heat Shock
`Proteins of Soybean Using Cloned cDNAs
`Fritz Schoffl and Joe L. Key
`
`Molecular Cloning of Rhizobium trifolii Genes
`Involved in Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation
`K. F. Scott, J. E. Hughes, P. M. Gresshoff,
`J. E. Beringer, B. G. Rolfe, and J. Shine
`
`327
`
`Transformation of Mammalian Cells to Antibiotic
`Resistance with 8 Bacterial Gene Under Control
`
`of the SV40 Early Region Promoter
`P. J. Southern and P. Berg
`
`(Continued on next page)
`
`This journal is listed in Current Contents.
`
`Editorial Board
`
`John Abelson, La Jolla
`Frederick Ausubel, Cambridge
`John R. Bedbrook, Canberra
`Lawrence Bogorad, Cambridge
`Mary-Dell Chilton, St. Louis
`Richard A. Flavell, London
`Raymond F. Gesteland, Salt Lake City
`Gary Gussin, Iowa City
`Dean H. Hamer, Bethesda
`Masayori Inouye, Stony Brook
`Robert Kamen, London
`Yuet Wai Kan, Sun FI’(tll('l.\‘(‘()
`Laurence H. Kedes, Palo Alto
`Daniel Klessig, Salt Lake Cit)‘
`Thomas Maniatis, Cambridge
`David W. Martin, Jr., San Francisco
`Marc Van Montagu, Gent
`Richard C. Mulligan, Cambridge
`Alexander Rich, Cambridge
`Jet? Schell, Cologne
`James Shepard, Manhattan
`John Shine, Canberra
`Joan A. Steitz, New Haven
`Robert T. Tjian, Berkeley
`Michael Wigler, Cold Spring Harbor
`Patricia Zambryski. Sari Francisco
`
`Editorial Associates
`
`Barbara Cordell. Boston
`David D. Moore, Boston
`
`Publisher
`
`Alan M. Edelson, Ph.D., Raven Press.
`New York
`
`Publication and Advertising Staff
`
`David A. Christie, Production Manager.
`Raven Press, New York
`Nancy Gordon, Assistant
`Editor-in-Chief. Boston
`lrene Rublnson, Advertising Manager.
`Raven Press. New York
`
`to the
`
`Journal of Molecular and Applied Genetics (ISSN 0271-6801) published bimonthly by Raven Press, Publishers, 1140 Avenue of the
`Americas, New York. N.Y. 10036. Subscription mtesfor Vol. I, 198ll2: Personal subscriptions $80 in U.S., $90 elsewhere; institutional
`subscriptions $135 in U.S.. $145 elsewhere. Air delivery included for European and Mediterranean countries; for air delivery elsewhere.
`add $15. Payment should accompany all orders. Please enclose present mailing label with all change of address requests. Address
`advertising inquiries to Advertising Manager, Raven Press. Copyright © 1982 by Raven Press.
`When citing this journal, abbreviate as J Mol Appl Genet.
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 63
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 63
`
`

`
`Jourlllll 0ftWUl1't'II/tlr (UNI A/J/I/lt'd Ut'IIl‘I1(.\
`1:327-J-3|
`'t'v I983 Raven Press, New York
`
`Transformation of Mammalian Cells to
`
`Antibiotic Resistance with a Bacterial Gene Under
`Control of the SV40 Early Region Promoter
`
`P. J. Southern and P. Berg
`
`Dt'[)(lI‘fI)1('l1I ofBim'lt¢'Ini.vII'v. Stanford UI1i|'(‘1‘.\'ll_\' Mc'di('u/ C(‘I1l(’I'. Stmtfnrrl. C'u/ffornia. U.S.A.
`
`Summary: A bacterial gene (neo) conferring resistance to neomycin-
`kanamycin antibiotics has been inserted into SV40 hybrid plasmid
`vectors and introduced into cultured mammalian cells by DNA trans-
`fection. Whereas normal cells are killed by the antibiotic G418. those
`that acquire and express neo continue to grow in the presence of G418.
`In the course ofthe selection, neo DNA becomes associated with high
`molecular weight cellular DNA and is retained even when cells are
`grown in the absence of G418 for extended periods. Since neo provides
`a marker for dominant selections. cell transformation to G418 resis-
`tance is an efficient means for cotransformation of nonselected genes.
`Key Words: Antibiotic resistance—Cel1 transformation—DNA
`transfection—Recombinant DNA—Bacterial genes.
`
`There are two principal approaches available
`for the introduction of exogenous DNA into
`mammalian cells. Simian virus 40 (SV40) can
`
`be used as a transducing vector because it can
`replicate vegetatively in primate cells (1) or be-
`come integrated into host chromosomal DNA
`in a wide variety of cells (2). The experimental
`strategy has been to replace various regions of
`the viral genome with cloned segments ofDNA
`and to propagate the recombinants with the aid
`of helper viruses in cultured animal cells
`(3-10). Alternatively. exogenous DNA may be
`introduced directly into recipient cells by either
`the calcium phosphate precipitation technique
`
`Reccivedjanuary 4. 1982: accepted February 18. 1982.
`Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr.
`7.1. Southern. Department of lmmunopathology.
`gsfripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Julla. CA
`.037.
`
`327
`
`(11), DEAE-dextran (12), or microinjection
`(13,14). The pioneering experiments for this
`approach relied on the transformation of TK'
`mammalian cell
`lines to a TI(’' phenotype
`with the herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene
`(15-17). Subsequently. unrelated DNA se-
`quences have been integrated with the thy-
`midine kinase gene in either linked or co-
`transformation experiments (18,19). Transfor-
`
`mation of appropriate mutant cell lines has also
`been demonstrated with cellular DNA se-
`
`quences and this approach has allowed the
`isolation of the chicken thymidine kinase gene
`(20) and the hamster adenine phosphoribosyl
`transferase gene (21). Morphologic transfor-
`mation of normal cells forms the basis of cur-
`
`rent attempts to isolate cellular oncogenes
`(22.23).
`Unfortunately. experiments that rely upon
`complementation of cell mutations by trans-
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 64
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 64
`
`

`
`338
`
`P. .I.
`
`.S'()(/'l‘III-IRN AN!) P. BERG
`
`duced genes are limited by the availability of
`mutant mammalian cell types to serve as gene
`recipients. Dominant-acting genetic markers.
`for example.
`those that produce a selectable
`change in the phenotype of normal cells. offer a
`solution to this difficulty. The isolation of
`methotrexate-resistant
`transformants after
`transfection of normal cells with DNA from
`
`-
`
`drug-resistant cells (24) exemplifies this ap-
`proach. However.
`transformation for metho-
`trexate-resistant dihydrofolate reductase is in-
`frequent and. therefore. the utility for cotrans-
`formation with other genes appears limited.
`Recently. our laboratory devised a family of
`SV40 hybrid plasmid vectors to facilitate
`studies of gene transfer and gene expression in
`mammalian cells (8,25). Plasmids containing
`DNA segments coding for rabbit B-globin (25).
`mouse dihydrofolate reductase (10). and E. colt‘
`xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase
`(8) can induce the synthesis of the corre-
`sponding gene products in mammalian cells.
`The expression of the bacterial gene, gpt. per-
`mits the utilization of xanthine as a substrate
`
`for the purine salvage pathway and a selection
`can be established in which gpt functions as a
`dominant marker for cell transformation (26).
`
`In this paper. we describe a second bacterial
`gene which. when incorporated into the same
`family of plasmid vectors. also provides a
`dominant selective marker for transformation
`of cultured mammalian cells.
`The selection for transformation of mamma-
`
`lian cells relies on cell killing by an amino-
`glycoside antibiotic, G4l8 (27). The structure of
`G4l8 resembles gentamicin. neomycin. and
`kanamycin (28) but. unlike these related com-
`pounds, G4l8 interferes with the function of
`80S ribosomes and blocks protein synthesis in
`eukaryotic cells (27). These aminoglycoside
`antibiotics can be inactivated by the bacterial
`phosphotransferases, Al’H(3')l| and APH(3‘)l
`encoded by transposons Tn5 and Tn60l.
`re-
`spectively (29). Jiminez and Davies (30)
`showed that yeast could be genetically trans-
`formed to G418 resistance by the phospho-
`transferasc gene contained in Tn6tll DNA.
`Thus. it seemed feasible (suggested by Sydney
`
`J. Mal. A/ml. (p':'Iu'I..
`
`l/ul. I. No. 4. I982
`
`Brenner) that the acquisition and expression 0
`the phosphotransferase gene by mammaliar
`cells might ctunfcrfesistzince to G4l8 toxicity
`Accordingly.
`the phosphotransferase gang
`from Tn5 (designated here neo) (29.3!) was in-
`troduced into the mammalian transcription unit
`of the pSV plasmid vectors.
`in this arrange-
`ment the SV4t) early promoter is 5'-proximal.
`and an intron and polyadenylation signal are
`3'-proximal.
`to the neo gene (8.25). Transfeo
`tion of a wide variety of mammalian ceil lines
`with these pSV-neo recombinants yields stable
`transformants that are resistant to G-H8 at a
`
`frequency of one transformant per l0‘-I0’
`transfected cells. Our data suggest that trans-
`formation results from the acquisition. mainte-
`nance. and continued expression of the neo
`gene in the cellular genome. Concurrent with
`our experiments. Colbére-Garapin ct al.
`(32)
`achieved mammalian cell
`transformation to
`0418 resistance with recombinant DNA con-
`
`taining the Tn5 neo gene linked to the herpes
`thymidine kinase promoter DNA segment.
`
`I MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Cells
`
`A wide range of cultured mammalian cells
`are sensitive to the antibiotic G4f8 (Table ll
`and several of these have been used for trans-
`
`formation experiments. The cells were rou-
`tinely maintained in Dulbecco-modified Eagle
`medium containing I0"/c newborn calf serum.
`penicillin and streptomycin. and the indicated
`concentrations of G418 were added to [ht
`medium.
`
`Enzymes
`
`Restriction enzymes were purchased from
`New England Biolabs and Bethesda Research
`Laboratories and digestions were performed
`according to the supplier's specifications. T‘
`polynucleotide kinase was purchased l'I'0"‘
`New England Nuclear and SI nuclease front
`Boehringer Mannheim. T4 DNA ligase and 5-
`mli DNA polymerase l were kindly provided
`by S. Schcrcr. Stanford University.
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 65
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 65
`
`

`
`'I'RAN.S'l-'()R.\M 'll()N 'I()x1N7'IBl()'I'l(' Rl;'SI.S"l'ANC'l-.‘
`
`329
`
`Antibiotic G418
`
`Samples of antibiotic G418 were generously
`provided by Dr. P. J. L. Daniels of Schering
`Corporation. Stock solutions containing 4
`mg/ml G418 in 100 mM N-2-hydroxyethylpi-
`pcrazine-N’-2’-ethanesulphonic acid buffer. pH
`7_3, were stored at —20°C and added in ap-
`propriilte amounts to the cell culture medium.
`The G418 concentration refers to the actual
`amount of drug in the solution and takes into
`account that
`the solid material was only 40-
`509? G418.
`
`DNA Transfection and Selection of
`Transformed Cells
`
`Supercoiled plasmid DNA, without added
`:arrier DNA. was introduced into tissue cul-
`ure cells (10 p.g for approximately 5 X 10"
`:ells) using the calcium phosphate precipitation
`echnique (11) with the addition of a glycerol
`;hock after 4 h (33). About 48 h after exposure
`0 DNA.
`the cells were trypsinized and re-
`ilated at a 1:20 dilution. Within 12-16 h, G418
`was added to the medium at a concentration of
`
`100 agmt. The medium plus drug was changed
`:very 4 to 5 days. Colonies were first detected
`ifter about 7 days in the selective medium and,
`1-13 days later,
`independent colonies were
`rypsinized in cloning cylinders and transferred
`0 microtiter wells. When the colonies were
`
`.mall, the transplanted cells were grown non-
`electively for an initial 2-3 days. Once estab-
`ished. the clones were expanded to stable cell
`ines in medium containing 400 pg/ml G418. In
`;on1c instances,
`the initial selection and sub-
`
`tloning used 400 ug/ml of G418 but the trans-
`ormed cells were subsequently maintained in
`‘.00 ug/ml of G418.
`The selection strategy of permitting cell
`trowth prior to the addition of G418 was
`idopted because a significant reduction in the
`ransformation frequency occurred if G418 was
`aided before 48 h. The trapsfected cells were
`eplated at lower cell density because G418 is
`nost effective against dividing cells. Con-
`cquently,
`if cells become stably transformed
`
`early after transfection, cell division prior to
`selection may result in overestimation of the
`transformation frequency. Nevertheless. none
`of the transformants from randomly selected
`colonies appeared to have the same organiza-
`tion of the integrated pSV-neo DNA.
`
`Analysis of Transformed Cell DNAs
`
`for pSV-neo Sequences
`
`High molecular weight cellular DNA was
`extracted as described by Wigler et al. (17),
`incubated with an excess of restriction en-
`
`zyme, and the digests were separated by elec-
`trophoresis in 0.8% agarose gels. After a mild
`depurination reaction (34).
`the DNA was
`transferred from the gel
`to diazobenzyloxy-
`methyl paper (DBM paper) (35), hybridized
`with radioactively labeled DNA probes (36),
`and radioautographed using Kodak XR5 film
`and Cronex lightning fast intensification screens
`at —70°C (37).
`
`Analysis of Cytoplasmic RNA
`Extracted from pSV2-neo
`Transformed Cells
`
`Cytoplasmic RNA was extracted from
`'semiconfluent cultures of transformed cells as
`
`described previously (38). The RNA was sepa-
`rated from contaminating DNA by pelleting
`through cesium chloride and then the poly A*
`RNA fractions were characterized using the
`Weaver-Weissmann variation (39) of the
`Berk-Sharp procedure (40). DNA hybrization
`probes (shown with individual experiments)
`were prepared by labeling appropriate restric-
`tion fragments at
`their 5'-ends with [y-"2P]-
`adenosine triphosphate and polynucleotide
`kinase (41). The DNA probes were hybridized
`with RNA samples under conditions of DNA
`excess. RN A-DNA hybrids were digested with
`S1 nuclease, and the protected fragments were
`analyzed by gel electrophoresis (39,40).
`
`Protein Labeling and
`lmmunoprecipitation Reactions
`
`Semiconfluent plates of pSV2-neo trans-
`formed cell lines were labeled for 14 h at 37°C
`
`J. Mu/. App]. (a'um‘r., Vol. I. No. 4. 1933
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 66
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 66
`
`

`
`_?_i’()
`
`P. J. .S'()UTIIl:'RN AN!) I’. Bl-{RC
`
`with ["'H]leucine (200 ,uCi/plate. specific activ-
`ity 55 Ci/mmol. New England Nuclear Labo-
`ratory). The soluble proteins were extracted
`from approximately 2 X 107 cells (7) and im-
`munoprecipitated with an antiphosphotransfer-
`ase APH(3’)ll serum (provided by J. Davies.
`Geneva). Esc/icricliia (‘vii cells (HBl0l) con-
`
`taining plasmids were grown to approximately
`2 X I0“ cells/ml in M9 minimal medium plus
`glucose with supplements of leucine. proline.
`threonine. and thiamine. Samples ofthe cultures
`(0.5 ml) were washed and resuspended in the
`same medium lacking Ieucine and then [“H]leu-
`cine was added (200 ;LCi/ml) for 60 min at 37°C.
`Excess unlabeled leucine was added and. after
`
`washing in M9 medium, the cells were disrupted
`by sonication. Cell debris was removed by cen-
`trifugation at 14,000g for 10 min and the super-
`natant was used directly for immunoprecipitation
`reactions. After incubation overnight at 0°C, the
`immune complexes were adsorbed to inacti-
`vated S. aureus cells (IgGsorb. Enzyme Cen-
`ter. Boston) and removed by centrifugation
`(42). The S. aureus cells were washed exten-
`
`sively and the bound proteins were eluted and
`electrophoresed in SDS polyacrylamide gels
`(43). After electrophoresis,
`the gels were
`treated with EN“HANCE (New England Nu-
`clear Laboratory). dried and autoradiographed
`as described above.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Mammalian Cells Are Sensitive to 0418
`
`The sensitivity of various cultured cell lines
`to G4l8 was assessed by plating cells at low
`cell density in microtiter wells in a medium
`supplemented with various concentrations of
`G418. Even at the highest drug concentration
`tested (800 p.g/ml), sensitive cells divided once
`or twice before cytotoxicity was observed. The
`response time for cell killing appears to corre-
`late with growth rate. since the most rapidly
`growing cells are killed in the shortest inter-
`vals. _At
`lower concentrations of G4|8 (100
`;ugJm|) there is a significant delay but the cells
`are killed eventually. All of the cell lines that
`
`J. Mal. Appl. (irm*!.. Vol. I, Nil. 4. I982
`
`TABLE I.
`
`(I4I8-.\'i-/I.\’iIii'i- niunmmliuii rvll li'mx"
`
`Monkey
`
`(‘V1
`CV I -P
`'l‘C7
`COS
`
`Human
`
`LNSV
`He La
`K-56'.’
`
`Mouse
`
`L
`Ltk
`3T3
`3T6
`PCC4
`F9
`MEL
`
`"So far. no cell
`resistant to G-H8.
`
`line has been found that is naturally
`
`have been tested (Table l) are killed by G4l8
`but CVI and HeLa are unusual because. at
`
`high cell density, these cells may require 10- I4
`days in G418 (400 ,ug/ml) before the cell killing
`can be observed.
`
`Construction of Recombinant
`
`Plasmids Containing neo
`
`The bacterial transposon Tn5 encodes a gene
`(neo) whose protein product—a phosphotrans-
`ferase (API-l(3')ll)—confers resistance to the
`
`kanamycin-neomycin group of antibiotics (31).
`From the studies of the organization of Tn5
`DNA, Reznikoff and colleagues (44.45) were
`able to identify the DNA segment that is essen-
`tial for the expression of neo. The ColEl:Tn5
`plasmid pRZl I2 (44). a deleted form of the or-
`ginal Col El:Tn5 hybrid plasmid (pRZl02. Fig-
`l). was the source of the neo! DNA segment
`pRZl I2 DNA was digested to completion with
`Hincll endonuclease and the 2.5 kb neo DNA
`
`segment was obtained by agarose gel electro-
`phoresis. After ligating a dccanucleotide se-
`quence containing the BumHl restriction silt-’
`(Collaborative Research) to the ends ofthe n60
`segment (46) the mixture was digested with an
`excess of Bu/nHl and Hindi]! restriction cf)‘
`donucleases and the resulting l.4 kb neo DNA
`fragment was purified by gel electrophoresis-
`This fragment. containing Ilindlll and BumH|
`cohesive ends at the 5’- and 3'-ends, re$P¢“
`tivcly. was inserted between the Hindlll and
`ziiimat restriction sites in p13R322 DNA. Ths
`resulting plasmid, pBR-neo (Fig. I). confers re-
`sistance in IS. vuli‘
`to both ainpicillin and
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 67
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 67
`
`

`
`7RAN.S'I"0RMz\ "HON 'l'() AN'I'I[1'l()Tl(‘ Rl;‘SI.S"I'AN(‘I:'
`
`33/
`
`donuclcasc digestion and substituting the neo
`fragment via the corresponding cohesive ends.
`The pSV3-neo and pSV5-nco (Fig. 2) deriva-
`tives were constructed from pSV2-neo as pre-
`viously described (8.25). Each of the pSV-neo
`plasmids replicates efficiently in E. to/i strain
`HBIUI and confers resistance to ampicillin and
`neomycin. Cloned isolates of each of the re-
`combinant plasmids were shown to have the
`anticipated structures by appropriate restric-
`tion enzyme analyses (data not shown).
`
`Cell Transformation with Recombinant
`
`Plasmids Containing neo
`
`Transfections of Ltk' cells with pRZll2 or
`pBR-neo plasmid DNA yielded occasional
`G418-resistant colonies (a frequency of about
`one transformant in 5 X 10" transfected cells).
`However, with 3T6 cells as recipient no trans-
`formants have been recovered with pRZll2
`DNA and only one transformant has been iso-
`lated after transfection with pBR-neo (fre-
`quency about one transformant
`in 10‘ trans-
`fected cells).
`In control experiments, cells
`transfected with either pSV2-gpt (8), pSV2-,BG
`(25) DNA, or mock-transfected without DNA
`
`have never yielded G418-resistant colonies
`(frequency less than I
`transformant
`in 10’
`transfected cells).
`
`In contrast to the low frequencies of G418-
`resistant transformation with pRZll2 (ColEl-
`neo) or pBR-neo plasmid DNAs, several dif-
`ferent mammalian cell lines were transformed
`
`to G418 resistance at relatively high frequency
`with the pSV-neo plasmid derivatives (about
`one transformant in 10‘
`to 10"’ transfected
`
`cells). Although the transformation frequencies
`with the different pSV-neo recombinants fall
`within a relatively narrow range; there is a con-
`sistent small difference which reflects the
`
`plasmids potential for replication in different
`host cells (Table 2). For example,
`the fre-
`quency of stable G418-resistant monkey cell
`transformants is two- to three-fold lower with
`
`pSV3-neo than with pSV5-neo. whereas the
`converse applies to the formation of G418-
`resistant mouse cell transformants. This differ-
`
`.I. Mal. /\[l[lf. (h'm'I.. Vol. I. No. 4. I933
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 68
`
`Hrml
`; i _
`
`HI/l(/iii
`Sail
`EH/ll
`1
`iAit3
`'
`‘
`l<— neo —o|
`
`
`Hmrl|—||
`Bglll
`I
`pRZ'l02
`
`H;J.i|
`‘H I
`
`/HHICIU Hm;/III
`Hpul
`lat)/II
`
`- ‘
`
`Hincll
`I
`
`i«
`
`M6
`5
`i<- neo —>t
`
`pRZ112
`
`lHiIlt.‘i| CLEAVAGE
`
`Hindi I I
`
`
`
`Hincll HincllBaal'89/ll
`
`
`
`HanlHl LINKEHS
`BJIHHI + Hinrllll CLEAVAGE
`ISOLATION OF neo GENE FRAGMENT
`
`Him‘/III
`‘Salli
`
`B.rmH|
`
`wsermow mro pen322
`SELECTION FOFI AmpR,NeoR
`
`F“
`
`Hinrllll
`Bglll
`
`
`
`iIG. 1. Organization of transposon Tn5 ‘and scheme for the
`onstruction of recombinant plasmid pBFl-neo. The plasmid
`tFlZ102 contains a complete copy of Tn5 inserted into CoIE1.
`‘he inverted repeat sequences at the ends of the transposon
`;re shown as thick lines. The region essential for expression
`Ii neomycin resistance in E. coli (neo) is indicated together
`aim the ATG codon that initiates the coding sequence of the
`tnosphotransterase. Relevant restriction endonuclease rec-
`Igf'l|liOn sites are included in the diagram. pRZ112 was de-
`lved from pFtZ102 by partial digestion with Hincll endonu-
`lease and ligation to eliminate a large segment of Tn5 DNA to
`ne 3‘ side of neo (Hincll endonuclease cleaves at Salt and
`‘pal endonuclease recognition sites.) Details of the ma-
`ipulations involved with the construction of pBFl—neo are
`liven in the text.
`
`Ieomycin: since the neo DNA segment inter-
`upts the tetracycline resistance gene, cells
`arrying this plasmid are sensitive to this anti-
`Il0tlC.
`-
`
`The cloned neo DNA segment was readily
`ntroduced into the plasmid vector—pSV2 (8)
`Fig. 2) by excising the B-globin cDNA segment
`rom pSV’_’-BC (25) with Hindlll and Bglll en-
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 68
`
`

`
`333
`
`1’.
`
`.1. sot/7‘:/I-.‘R.-\-' AN!) I’. BI-JRG
`
`Amp
`
`(185132? on
`
`Pvull
`
`pSV2- neo
`
`Pill "
`
`8.miHl
`
`SV40 on
`UN
`
`panazz on
`
`pm,“
`
`s\/40 0,.
`
`0.17
`
`pSV3- neo
`
`fl'airiHl
`
`SV40— Tag
`
`989322 on
`
`Pvull
`
`SV4O on
`
`0.17
`
`PY-
`
`FIG. 2. Structures of the pSV-neo hybrid plasmids. The pSV plasmids are composed of DNA segments from various source
`pBH322 DNA. represented by the solid black are. contains the pal’-‘i322 origin of DNA replication (pBR322 ori) and the ti-Iactama
`gene (Arnp"}: the hatched segment represents the neo gene (1.4 Kb fragment. Fig. 1);SV-10 DNA sequences are indicated as II
`dotted segments. The Swap origin ol DNA replication (SWO on) and the SV40 early promoter are present on a small tragme
`{SWO map units 0.71-0.65] immediately 5' to the neo segment. The plasmids pSV3-neo and pSV5-neo were constructed lro
`pSV2-neo by insertion ol either an intact SV-$0 early region or an intact polyoma early region that contains a duplication of It
`viral origin of replication (Bl.
`
`ence may be related to the ability of pSV3
`plasmids to replicate in monkey cells and pSV5
`plasmids to replicate in mouse cells (25). A
`comparable result was previously noted in
`transformations with pSV3-gpt and pSV5-gpt
`recombinflnls (26)-
`
`Stable Integration of neo DNA Sequence:
`after Transfection into Cultured Cells
`
`The content and organization of neo DN.-'
`sequences have been examined in a number 0
`stable G4l8 transformed cell lines. The Ltk’ 0
`
`TABLE 2. Truri.\_/imnulimi _/i'('([m'Il('l'(‘.\’ _/in‘ I’('(‘tIIIlbiIl(lIlI
`Il('n pIu.mriil.\"‘
`
`Hiisi cells
`
`Ltk
`
`3'l‘(i
`
`TC7
`
`'
`I x It)
`7 X It)
`‘
`-3 x It)
`pSV2~ncu
`"’
`6 X It)
`'
`|.5 x Ill
`'
`--3 X ll)
`pSV3-neo
`'
`2 x H)
`'
`4 x It)
`'
`-3 X It)
`pSV5-neo
`
`
`
`
`5 X Ill “ I X It) "[JBR-DL'0 Ni) colonies isul:iIci.I
`
`lrainslormailiun lrcqiicncy is cxprcssctl us the fraction ulcclls plrilcd
`"
`that produce: viiihlc colonies in scluclivi: medium Following trtiiislbctiun
`with saiturziting levels of DNA.
`
`J. Mill.
`
`.-\/I/)/. (:'t'm'I.. Vol. I, No. 4, I982
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 69
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 69
`
`

`
`TRANSFORMA TION T0 /tNTlBI()'I'l(‘ RESlS'l'AN('l;'
`
`333
`
`Ltk‘/pSV2neo
`/
`
`l2F|2Gl2J|2K| MI
`
`_
`
`LINEAR
`_ pSV2neo
`
`,
`
`C&
`
`20 kb -
`
`_
`
`5'6 kb
`
`1 kb ~
`
`FIG. 3. Detection of pSV2-neo DNA sequences in trans-
`formed cells. High molecular weight cell DNA was extracted
`irom representative G418-resistant Ltk‘ cell lines that had
`been transformed with pSV2-neo plasmid DNA. The DNA
`samples were digested with an excess of Eco RI restriction
`endonuclease and then fractionated by electrophoresis in a
`0.6% agarose gel. DNA in the gel was translerred to DBM
`paper and hybridized with radioactively labeled pSV2-neo
`DNA. There is a single recognition site in pSV2-neo DNA tor
`EcoFil cleavage and the marker track (M) shows the position
`of pSV2-neo linear DNA. Approximate molecular sizes were
`derived irom A DNA restriction fragments in an adjacent slot
`on the gel.
`
`selective medium. The relative plating eff"-
`ciency ofthe 2F or 2G cell lines after seeding in
`the presence or absence of G418 is within ex-
`perimental variation,
`the same (ratio 0.6 to
`0.9:l.0). Moreover.
`there was no discernible
`
`variation in the organization of the pSV2-neo
`DNA in the high molecular weight cell DNA
`obtained from 2F and 2G cell DNAs recovered
`
`1T6 transformanls arising from transfections
`(vim pSV2-neo. pSV3-neo, or pSV5—neo do not
`contain plasmid-related sequences (limits of
`detection 0.5 plasmid molecules per cell) in the
`[ow molecular weight DNA of a Hirt superna-
`mnt (47). However. cell DNA obtained from
`G418-resistant transformants contained nucle-
`utide sequences homologous to the transfecting
`plasmid DNA. High molecular weight DNA
`from a representative set of pSV2-neo Ltk'
`transformants was cleaved with EcoRl restric-
`tion endonuclease. electrophoresed in an
`agarose gel.
`transferred to DBM paper. and
`then hybridized with radioactively labeled
`pSV2-neo DNA (Fig. 3). Since pSV2-neo DNA
`contains a single Er-oRl restriction site, each
`integrated plasmid copy should produce two
`hands after hybridization with the pSV2-neo
`probe if there is no rearrangement or scram-
`bling of the plasmid DNA sequences during in-
`tegration. Most of the transformants that have
`been examined appear to have a low plasmid
`copy number, generally one to five copies per
`cell. Transformant 2G is exceptional
`in that
`there are multiple copies of the plasmid and a
`substantial amount of apparent linear pSV2-
`neo DNA is produced by digestion with EcoRl
`endonuclease (Fig. 3). Since no circular plas-
`mid DNA was present in the Hirt supernatant
`fraction prepared from 2G cells and the high
`molecular weight DNA of the Hirt pellet hy-
`bridized strongly to a radioactively labeled
`pSV2-neo probe (results not shown). it is likely
`that transformant 20 contains either a tandem
`
`array of integrated plasmid DNA or autono-
`mously replicating polymeric plasmid DNA.
`Although the latter possibility can not be
`excluded,
`it seems less likely because the
`G418-resistant phenotype as well as the copy
`number and organization of the neo DNA se-
`quences do not change after passaging in non-
`selective medium (see below).
`The Ltk" 2F and 2G cell
`
`lines have been
`
`cultured for over 3 months (approximately 100
`cell generations) in medium lacking or con-
`taining G4l8 (200 ,ugJml): such cells remain
`fully resistant to G418 when challenged in
`
`times during their growth in the
`at different
`presence or absence of G418 (Fig. 4). Thus. it
`appears that the amount and arrangement of
`the pSV2-neo plasmid DNA sequences are sta-
`
`J. Mul. rl/vpl. C(‘Il(‘I.. Vol. I. Na. 4. I98.’
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 70
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 70
`
`

`
`334
`
`P. J. SOUTHERN AND P. BERG
`
`Ltk' pSV2neo2F
`
`Ltk" pSV2nao2G
`
`Ltk‘pSV2neo2G
`
`‘:45
`.3:
`-(5
`.3:
`,
`Q,
`Q,
`C’
`0
`0
`0°‘
`G‘
`05
`8.
`5-.‘
`§\
`14‘;/°|G|V|* |’|¢t I‘ I’Iq'I
`

`
`‘
`VIII‘-O‘
`
`FIG. 4. Detection of pSV2-neo DNA se-
`quences after extended passaging oi
`transformed cells. High molecular weight
`chromosomal DNA was extracted from
`parallel cultures of the translormed cell
`lines 2F and 26 that had been maintained
`in the presence (+G-118) or absence
`(—G418) oi G418 (see text). DNA samples
`were digested with EcoFtl endonuclease
`and analyzed as described in Fig. 3. The
`tracks at the extremities ol the gel
`_
`(labeled 2F and 26) contain samples of
`the original DNA preparations (see Fig. 3). R
`The central track contains parental Ltk‘
`cell DNA. The panel at the right of the tig-
`ure is a shorter exposure during au-
`toradiography of the Ltk‘ pSV2-neo 2G
`cell DNA.
`
`"""
`
`-
`
`"’
`
`pSV2ne
`
`_ LINEA
`
`ble during growth of these two transformed cell
`lines under selective or nonselective condi-
`tions.
`
`We sought to determine if stable transforma-
`tion for the transduced marker could occur in
`the absence of selection. Accordingly. semi-
`confluent cultures of mouse 3T6 cells were
`transfected with pSV3-neo or pSV5-neo DNA
`and one set of cells was maintained under the
`standard conditions for transformation and an-
`other set was propagated in the absence of
`G418 for about
`l2 generations (2 weeks) and
`then the G418 selection was applied. The
`transformation frequency in the first set was
`l0‘* to l0""' whereas the second set yielded
`about one-fifth the number of transformants
`predicted from the initial value and the number
`of cell divisions that had intervened before the
`selection was applied. Assuming that
`trans-
`formed and normal cells divide at the same rate
`in medium lacking G4l8 and considering the
`inherent
`inaccuracies of the experiment,
`it
`
`.1. Mnl. A/I/II. (im¢'I., Vol. I. No. 4. I932
`
`seems that the neo marker is associated will
`the cellular genome relatively early and is re
`tained in the absence of G418 selection.
`
`Expression of the neo Gene in pSV2-neo
`Transformed Cells
`
`The expression of neo in G418-resistant
`transformants has been confirmed by the de-
`tection of neo mRNAs and phosphotransfcrase
`protein. Cytoplasmic, poly(A)* RNA was iso-
`lated from pSV2-neo transformed Ltk‘ cells
`(isolates F and G) and hybridized to an end-
`labeled DNA probe specific for pSV2-neo SC‘
`quenccs.
`In each sample. digestion with SI
`nuclease and electrophoresis of the protected
`DNA in an ngarose gel (39.40) yielded ll single
`fragment of I500 bases (Fig. 5). The production
`of a I500 base fragment is consistent with the
`occurrencc ofan RNA that extends throughout
`the length ofthc neo segment and suggests that
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 71
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1004, pg 71
`
`

`
`/It/t.\'.s'I-‘ii/e.i1.4 "I/UN 'l() AN’!/11/()1/(' Rl;'SIS'I"AN(‘l;‘
`
`335
`
`MARKERS
`
`Ltk‘
`
`2F
`
`2G
`
`Bg/ll
`
`— PROBE
`
`bp
`
`FIG. 5. Detection ol neo sequences in cyto-
`plasmic RNA extracted from pSV2-neo trans-
`formed Ltk‘ cells. A DNA probe was prepared by
`5' end-labeling with "P at the BamHI restriction
`site at the 3’ extremity oi the neo DNA tragment.
`(The BamHI site was not preserved in the con-
`struction ol pSV2-neo and the probe tor this ex-
`periment was prepared trom another derivative
`plasmid.) Relevant restriction endonuclease
`cleavage sites are indicated in the diagram.
`RNA-DNA hybrids were formed under condi-
`tions of DNA excess (40) and the S1 nuclease
`digests were lractionated on a 1% neutral
`agarose gel. Marker bands were produced by
`digesting the DNA probe with Bgll, Hindlll and
`Bgilt restriction endonucleases. The DNA trag-
`ment protected by the translormed cell FtNAs is
`shown in the diagram as a continuous line
`under the representation ot the DNA probe.
`
`PROBE FOR pSV2-neo RNA
`
`EcoR|
`
`Pirull
`290
`
`Egil Hindlll
`:
`:
`
`"I2
`
`320
`
`Sqfll
`
`1110
`
`BamHl
`
`osssnvso PROTECTED
`FRAGMENT
`
`
`1500
`
`the 5'-end of the RNA is located beyond the
`Hmdlll site. most probably in proximity to the
`S\'-til early promoter. Note that although the
`copy number of pSV2-neo DNA sequences is
`much higher in the 2G cells (Figs. 3 and 4). the
`amount of neo mRNA in the 2F and 2G trans-
`lorincd cell lines is about the same.
`
`"In determine if the G-H8-resistant transfor-
`
`m..nts produce phosphotransferase protein,
`scniiconfluent cultures of normal and trans-
`
`lormed cells were labeled for l4 h at 37°C with
`
`llllcucine. Labeled extracts of E. coli har-
`
`Nnng pBR-neo or pBR322 were made for
`mmpurison (see Mztterizils and Methods). Im-
`mune complexes prepared from each of these
`cttnacts were elcctrophoresed in sodium dode-
`cyl sulphate polyacrylamidc gels (Fig. 6). ll is
`evident that the immunoprecipitate from r-nli
`‘fffying pBR-neo contains it peptide of 25
`Ktlodultons. whereas the extract from cells
`hiking neo does not contain that peptide. The
`
`molecular weight estimate for API-l(3’)lI ob-
`tained from E. coli agrees with earlier findings
`(48). Comparisons of the electrophoretic pat-
`tern of immune complexes obtained from un-
`transformed and two pSV2-neo transformed
`Ltk‘ cells (isolates F and G) reveal that the
`transformants contain a specific band corre-
`sponding to a protein of 28 kilodaltons with no
`indications of a protein of 25 kilodaltons

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket