throbber
The Fishwrap
`Personalized News System
`Pascal R. Chesnazs,
`Matthew J . Mucklo, and Jonathan A . Sheena
`MIT Media Laboratory
`20 Ames Street
`Cambridge. Massachusetts, CSA
`
`Fishwrap is an experimental electronic
`Abstract-
`newspaper system available at MIT. Fishwrap a t t e m p t s
`to address the needs of the freshman integrating into the
`M I T community. Fishwrap a t t e m p t s this by balancing
`an individual’s desire for personalization with the need
`to participate and know about the world at large. This
`paper describes the scope of the experiment, t h e under-
`lying technology, and the evaluation by participants.
`
`. I. INTRODUCTION
`INCE the fall of 1993, the MIT community has been
`
`S using a prototype electronic newspaper under devel-
`
`opment at MIT’s Media Laboratory, called Fishwrap -
`after the journalist’s proverb: “Yesterday’s news wraps
`today’s fish.” It’s designed to address the needs of fresh-
`men integrating into the MIT community. Fishwrap
`attempts to balance an individual’s desire for person-
`alization with the need to participate and know about
`the world at large. Fishwrap provides its readers with
`an egocentric window into world affairs, allowing them
`to receive news from their home town as well as stories
`of personal interest. In addition to personally selected
`stories, Fishwrap provides a continuous update of se-
`lected general news items and features, thus connecting
`readers both to the MIT community and the world.
`The Fishwrap design readily accepts traditional news
`wire stories and direct contributions from the commu-
`nity. Social and cultural calendars are also collected
`and integrated into the system. All items coming into
`the system are analyzed for geographic or topical rele-
`vancy. Stories are automatically placed into categories
`such as: ‘Star Trek,” “softball,” “artificial intelligence,”
`or even “0. J. Simpson.” The Fishwrap employs an
`automated news model called “Glue,”[l] which is-com-
`posed of interrelated components that assemble an in-
`dividual’s news: user profile, knowledge representation,
`news suppliers, authentication, self and community or-
`ganization, customization, and presentation. Fishwrap
`employs a newspaper object abstraction built on an ex-
`tensible platform-independent data structure referred
`to as Dtypes[S]. Thus, not all the Glue modules need
`to exist within the same program or on the same ma-
`chine. The individual’s newspaper object is first loaded
`with information about the individual’s preferences and
`
`This project is p m of the ongoing News in the Future m a r c h
`consortium at the Media Laboratory directed by Walter Bender.
`
`is continuously updated as it passes through various
`Glue modules. Tools exist for manipulating these data
`structures in C and C++. Other tools can be written
`quickly. U’ith this model, we can develop modules in-
`dependently and distribute the load across the network
`to machines that have the necessary resources.
`
`11.’A READER’S VIEW O F FI’SHWRAP
`An MIT student’s first interaction with Fishwrap oc-
`curs in front of one of the four hundred publicly acces-
`sible Atbena workstations. Students learn of Fishwrap
`from friends, by exploring the computer’s pull clown
`menus, or seeing an advertisement around campus. Ac-
`cess to Fishwrap’s personalized news system appears as
`a U’orld \Vide Web (WWW) hypertext link. This link
`calls upon programs, t.o subscribe the individual to the
`news service.
`.4t this time an individ:ual access pass-
`‘ word is provided. After the initial session students can
`get Fishwrap from any computer connected to the MIT
`network (including personal computers in their dorm
`ro3ms and off-campus living groups) with a WWW
`browser (see Figure 1). It takes about 15 seconds to
`generate a personalized news presentation.
`Three questions are asked of the first time user.
`“Where are you from?”, “What is your afiliation with
`MIT?” and “What majors interest you?” These ques-
`tions provide the foundation for their personal news
`profile. The answer to the first question is used to
`create a “hometown news” section in the individual’s
`news profile. This section contains geographically rel-
`evant information ( “local” means something different
`to each person at MIT). The answers to the last two
`questions are used to create a section with news re-
`lated to career choices; news that will keep the individ-
`ual abreast of trends in specific industries; community
`news (seminars, job posting, etc.); and news affecting
`an undergraduate’s class government, or news regarding
`employees benefits (for faculty/staff participants).
`World Wide Web browser access allows for easy
`traversing of the information space (see Figure 2). The
`multilayered nature of the Fishwrap news presentation
`allows the individual to quickly determine where there is
`activity of interest. The main page shows which filters
`have found news content. The reader can then focus
`in on that news category and see summaries of stories
`
`275
`
`L
`
`.
`
`Petitioners Great West Casualty Co., BITCO Gen. Ins. Corp., and BITCO Nat'l Ins. Co.
`Ex. 1031, p. 275
`
`

`
`I I
`
`,
`
`---_..------ -
`
`-IIUu.u--
`----..--I ---e-
`
`.
`
`
`
`Fig. 2. A Fishwrap reader starts with their edition’s table of con-
`tents, then focuses on a particular news topic and, ultimately,
`articles that are illustrated with graphics and audio.
`
`&
`
`I
`..7w.:7” ..=. *.-4’X-r--eq----
`4pgm P I T ) x m m
`Federal Building to Come Down Next Week
`KELLY KURT, Assoaabd h
`r
` Writer
`w-
`a.- WC..
`cm(Ls)-TIDnyucv.9nl- w M -SWWIDI.P.~-LM
`--U. GMUS-”
`Lt W % q N m b y -
`N b-lh((
`m n r s M n h U l ‘W W w
`w
`.n6 i o a i Tusday.-uCUr
`m-dmrikdp
`u v M F a r m ~ o c t * r p l . c , b a . m . n 6 a m
`-.
`Cs*”
`p. “Jmn
`
`-
`
`
`
`Fig. 1. Pascal’s edition of Fishwrap viewed with a N‘orld Wide
`Web browser. News topics are grouped into reader defined
`“sections” and are accessed by clicking on the hypertext link
`(underlined text in this illustration).
`
`Fig. 3. Below the Fishwrap’s clickable image is the path to the
`current document relative to the “top” of the hypertext doc-
`ument is always displayed. This provides the reader familiar
`reference points.
`
`that matched the filter. If an article summary seems in-
`teresting, the reader can expand on it - getting the full
`text and relevant graphics or audio augmentation. This
`structure provides the reader with a consistent model
`of where things are located within the Fishwrap. As a
`navigation aid, Fishwrap presents the individual with a
`status bar at the top of each page. The status bar indi-
`cates where the reader is in the hypertext document (see
`Figure 3). Fishwrap records how individuals navigate
`in order to adapt future presentations to their reading
`habits[2].
`Augmenting the content of the reader’s news profile
`can happen in many ways. The most commonly used
`method is to select from a list of existing news topics
`(topics are how articles are categorized when they are
`received). In addition, each article displays the news
`topics which it matches. This enables the readers to
`directly view similar articles or is used to immediately
`
`~
`
`add the news topic to their profile.
`Not all of the intelligence for article selection need
`reside in the server. The Fishwrap community also has
`a “front page” called “Page One” (see Figure 4) where
`readers add articles they think are important for the
`community at large. The ranking of stories on Page One
`is based on the number of people who actually accessed
`the article. This allows the reader to enjoy the breadth
`of community interests, be exposed to new commusi-
`ties, and participate both explicitly and implicitly in
`the collaborative process. Page One leverages off of in-
`telligence in the Fishwrap community.
`Fishwrap offers the reader a number of staples - social
`and cultural calendars, reviews, and advice columns.
`Calendars are provided by both large organizations
`(The Boston Globe, MIT Arts Office, MIT Activiti es...)
`and individual Fishwrap readers. While restaurant re-
`views provided by the large organizations (The Boston
`
`276
`
`Petitioners Great West Casualty Co., BITCO Gen. Ins. Corp., and BITCO Nat'l Ins. Co.
`Ex. 1031, p. 276
`
`

`
`i i
`
`r
`
`each article is supplied to the Fishwrap news database
`server [4] where it will remain for the next 48 hours. At
`this point, a copy of the article is also sent immediately
`over zephyr 1.51 to subscribers who have expressed real
`interest in that topic. For those readers. notification of
`the article appears right on their screen (see Figure 5).
`
`t
`
`Fig. 4. Fishwrap's "Page One" contains articles selected by read-
`ers. Articles are ranked by popularity. Not all of the intelli-
`gence for article selection need reside in the server. Page One
`leverages off of intelligence in our community.
`
`Globe and Zagat) reflect the likes and dislikes of the
`population at large, access to the reviews is organized
`from the perspective of a pedestrian on campus. Sub-
`missions from the readers provide reviews of the local
`fare (the food trucks, "cheap eats", etc.).
`111. THE LIFE OF AN ARTICLE
`Although an article's life begins long before it ever
`reaches our database server, within Fishwrap an ar-
`ticle begins when it appears on any incoming data
`stream. Each data stream has its own supplier pro-
`gram which monitors incoming traffic. Articles come
`to Fishwrap in many formats: over satellite, radio fre-
`quencies, email. and phone line. Each supplier program
`does three things: First, it translates all news items
`into an internal, wire-independent representation using
`the Dtype [3] expandable data structure. Second, the
`supplier adds a signature to each item. The signature
`represents an inference made from the data. Finally,
`
`Fig. 5 . Articles of interest to an individual can be delivered as
`Zephyr windowgrams bs they arrive in the Fishwrap system.
`
`LVhen a reader generates a newspaper through Fish-
`wrap, an article is retrieved if it matches one of the
`reader's global topics of interest (like stamp collecting,
`gay rights, etc.). or one of the reader's personal topic
`definitions (hometown news or special topic news). The
`article is then rendered by the front end application
`with hints given by the signatures. Fishwrap also checks
`its photo and audio databases to see if there are pho-
`tos and sound recordings that match the story. For
`most Fishwrap readers, articles are rendered in hyper-
`text markup language (HTML) for a WWW browser.
`The article's unique identifier is recorded as having been
`presented to the reader in his/her personal database.
`An article does not necessarily disappear when the user
`is done reading it. If the reader feels the article is in-
`teresting enough for the whole MIT community, he or
`she can add it to Page One, email it, save it to disk, or,
`soon, save it in his/her personal scrapbook. Fishwrap
`records any available observations: was the article read,
`in what order, did the reader inspect all the topics, etc.
`IV. WHAT IS GLUE?
`Glue is the process of forming a newspaper by re-
`trieving relevant articles. Glue is an iinfrastructure for
`news gathering and disseminating. Glue was designed
`to bind individual modules into one coherent, extensible
`package. It is this glue that holds together the hyper-
`
`.
`
`277
`
`Petitioners Great West Casualty Co., BITCO Gen. Ins. Corp., and BITCO Nat'l Ins. Co.
`Ex. 1031, p. 277
`
`

`
`text, email. zephyr: and the hardcopy distributions of
`Fishwrap[G]. Glue provides a standard “plug and play‘‘
`set of tools for servers. knowledge representations mod-
`ules, user profiling systems, and presentation modules.
`It also takes care of all the bookkeeping; e.g. who‘s
`read what, where. and when. Figure 6 shows how Glue
`connects all the components of our personalized news
`process int’o one process.
`
`user
`M o d e l
`
`World
`Topics
`(knowledge representation)
`
`Fig. 6. The Glue infrastructure for news gathering and dissemi-
`nation.
`
`Glue defines a data format and outlines the flow of
`data between modules for all our news applications, and
`divorces the presentation specific code from the globally
`useful services. As a result new and diverse user appli-
`cations are created with relatively little work.
`An application can use Glue modules independently,
`or it can use the packaged Glue process outlined below.
`The module names are shown in boldface. Modules be-
`ginning with a p p are designed to hold the customizable
`portions of the Glue process, while the Glue- modules
`are the global services provided to all applications.
`v. MORE ON FISHWRAP’S INFRASTRUCTURE
`User Profire - It is important for the Fishwrap sys-
`tem to know an individual’s personal interests and com-
`munity affiliations. Fishwrap maintains a number of
`
`* laad environment vanabla
`
`* for rack secrum i n the profile
`information. includmg the list of topics included in thal S U o n
`* for each topic in the currcnl section
`
`- gluc2up rrads the USQ s profile
`- load the -on
`- glueZreguer6 uanslatcs the interest in a parucular topic (found In the
`- IppSenrchModif~ d f i e s search with appllcaaon s p e a k pjrarrrtcrs
`- appPoaFilter fillers k mcles reNmed from the sewer using applicaaon
`
`profile) inlo q u a y for gvcn news server ryp
`
`* glue2server subnuts the quay io rbc server
`
`specific paramdm
`* glue2booklc recordr chow arucles as ‘prcsenkd’ ID h e users pemnal
`darabilw
`* appRcorder reordas amcles uslog application spccrfic paramctcrs
`oppRender modcrs har topic using apphcauon specific pararmerr
`* don mtb lopic
`* appPostSectionFiltv
`appRc~der h s h t s rmdcnng that mp~c
`* d w mch section
`
`Fig. 7. Glue’s process flow for generating a personalized news-
`paper.
`
`data structures, the most important being the %ser
`profile” (see Figure 8.) This Dtype has all the per-
`sonal and global topic subscriptions, biographical in-
`formation. and the reader’s home town information.
`Fishwrap also maintains other data structures for book
`keeping purposes (which articles were read, when and
`which order).
`Supplrers and Servers - Fishwrap receives news
`from a variety of sources and formats. The tradi-
`tional news wires (Associated Press, Reuters, Knight-
`Ridder/Tribune, and BPI Entertainment all are p r e
`viding their news feeds to Fishwrap) come in ANPA[’i]
`format. Fishwrap also receives submissions via elec-
`tronic mail and a number of “homebrew” formats. In
`all cases Fishwrap repackages the articles into a Dtype
`(see Figure 9). This article structure preserves all the
`information that the supplier provides.
`All news items then run through a series of filters and
`add “signatures” to characterize the news item. The
`following are some of the signatures Fishwrap uses:
`Topic matches: Fishwrap’s content understanding
`module compares each story to the knowledge base
`of topic definitions. This can quickly be done by
`analyzing the article text to find relevant organiza-
`tions, personalities, or even trade jargon (see Fig-
`ure 10). Each articie is then tagged with a list of
`which topics it matched. Pre-categorizing stories
`in this way allows us to significantly speed up the
`searches.
`Q Geographic origin of the story: This is determined
`from the dateline. Stories with datelines in the
`US are tagged with zipcodes. Zipcodes allow us to
`quickly find news from surrounding neighborhoods
`and counties.
`4 Formatting information: Story containing tabular
`
`278
`
`Petitioners Great West Casualty Co., BITCO Gen. Ins. Corp., and BITCO Nat'l Ins. Co.
`Ex. 1031, p. 278
`
`

`
`(('type' ('nem' 'lexr 'article' ) ) ('story-number'
`'0914' ) ('selector-code"
`'Mx-' ) ('Priority' 'rush' ) ('source' 'AP stale' ) ('formatlD' 'let )
`('slugworS 'TX--USAtrCrash-SuR' ) rwordcounl' '0248' ) ('zipcode'
`7'CCIo' ) ('crty- 'HOUSTON' ) ('state' 7x' ) ('country' 'USA') (7x'
`'HOUSTON' ) rbodf
`HOUSTON (AP) -. Sufvwors of a Houston " a n killed in last year's
`USAir crash in Charlone. N C have filed a wrongful death sun against the
`airline in federal wun
`James Glaser husband of Mary .lo Klostemn filed the SUR Fnday
`seeking unspecdied damages for himself and the couple's 1Oyear-okl
`davghter and 7-year-okl son
`The Exxon geologist was retuming home froin a spsabng engagement
`at the Unrverslty of South Carolina-Columla *en
`the USAir CC-9 crashed
`July 2 after aborting a landing dunng a murderstom
`01 the 57 people on board. 37 were blled
`Glasets lawsuit contends the USAir cocrpn crew was neglgem in
`anempbng to land dunng a munderstm and in failing to read immedtately
`to a low-level wmd shear w m i n g they r-ed
`The sm also alleges grass neglgence by Me company in Mphaslzmg
`the need for Rghts to remain on schedule. rmhouf regard for safefy
`The air camer also toleram unacceptable k v e k of nsk-tabng the SUR
`USAtr spokesman Rick Weinfraub decllned to comment Wednesday
`because W e maner i m k s pending litrgahon
`Ftfteen passengers and five mew members siiNNed Me uash Donan
`Amery Doucene. 20. of Baytown. Texas. lost a leg as a resun of the crash
`and was bumed Over 70 percent of h s body He liked a $125 mllm sun
`agaimr Me Artigton. Va -based camer hsf year
`'AP-WS-0517-95 1149EDT ) (%~ll-slug' 'BC-TX-USAir
`' ) ('Date'
`Crash-Suit.MJW ) ('headline"SuMvors of Crash Vicfim Sue USAir' )
`("Queld' ~-TX-USAirCrash-Sum)914a95405' ) ('lope-matches' () )
`HOUSTON (AP) - Survrwrs of a Houston wornan lolled in last yeafs
`('summary'.
`USAir crash in Charlone N C nave filed a mongful death sun against the
`airline in federal muR
`James Glaser nustend of Mary Jo Klosterman filed the sun Frtday
`) (-Pastes '(05-17) t 1 49 18' ) ('unimme' 800725'VS ) 1
`
`said
`
`Fig. 9. An AP article in a Dtype structure. The first and third
`portion is material derived from the AIVPA format coding
`other information added to the article b:y the signature pro-
`cess.
`
`Fig. 10. The aviation topic is defined in a !server independent
`representation. This allows us to translate "has organiza-
`tion" into a form we can use during the analysis of articles
`as they come into the Fishwrap system or 21s a requests from
`an arbitrary server.
`
`279
`
`Fig. 8. Pascal's initial personal news profile. This data struc-
`ture contains the essential information for creating a personal
`news presentation. It is a list-like structure. The first list
`deals with news topic subscriptions, grouped into user-defined
`sections. The second list is the individual's biographical in-
`formation. The third list contains the individual's hometown.
`
`data or html formatting are tagged.
`Our current Fishwrap news server uses a media-
`independent representation, that allows it to accept
`items with graphics. audio, text. and motion pictures.
`It is up to the presentation application to determine the
`appropriate medium to provide.
`VI. FISHWRAP PRESENTATIOX ISTERFACE
`
`In order to reach as many people as possible, the
`Fishwrap personal newspaper generation has been de-
`signed to be independent of its interface. Its audience
`can be reached in the form of ink on paper, a hypertext
`document, an email message, or even a windowgam as
`news of interest enters the Fishwrap news servers. The
`primary mode of communication and interaction, how-
`ever, is through hypertext presented through a WWW
`browser.
`Why hyperted: Fishwrap uses hypertext as means
`of structuring the presentation. It allows the individ-
`ual to follow links along the Fishwrap table of contents
`akin to the way one would flip to pages of a traditional
`newspaper. HTML allows us to specify some of the
`visual attributes of the documents we present to the
`individual. HTML also provides a uniform mechanism
`for accepting input from the reader. HTML support is
`
`Petitioners Great West Casualty Co., BITCO Gen. Ins. Corp., and BITCO Nat'l Ins. Co.
`Ex. 1031, p. 279
`
`

`
`widely available.
`WK’W client/server: We use the TVLVW client-server
`model to communicate HTML documents with our
`users. The Fishwrap user begins his/her session by con-
`necting to our i+%’W’ servers. The server verifies that
`the user is authorized to access our service. Fishwrap‘s
`server then presents users with a menu of choices: “Gen-
`erate a new edition of your newspaper”. “Jump to your
`last edition”, and “Make changes to your news profile
`with PaperBuilder” . Fishwrap servers also store the in-
`dividual’s news profiles. Fishwrap employs access con-
`trol mechanisms to restrict document access to particu-
`lar hosts on the internet, groups of people, and individ-
`uals. Mechanisms exist to allow the individual to define
`his/her own access groups.
`On-Demand Publtshing: Fishwrap’s use of the WWW
`is different from existing servers. Rather than be an
`archive of documents, Fishwrap contructs its personal-
`ized news documents on the 0y. Building documents
`on demand allows Fishwrap to provide the most recent
`news. Fishwrap can personalize the documents given
`the contextual information about origin of the docu-
`ment request (who asked for it and why). Personaliza-
`tion can take the form of providing timel?; information
`not necessarily related to the news being displayed (ad-
`vertisement, calendar reminders. etc.).
`Customtzation: Xn interface called PaperBuilder (see
`Figure 11) exists for use as an explicit set of methods
`for manipulating the user’s profile. A person‘s profile is
`primarily organized into sections defined by the reader.
`These sections are filled with topical filters. The filters
`are selected manually from a list of topics or are auto-
`matically based upon the specification of a geographic
`location. Users have full control over what sections a p
`pear in their individual papers. Sew sections can be
`added, removed or unsubscribed at any time. Readers
`can also assign section-encompassing filters such as one
`to remove articles related to sports. Fishwrap has the
`capacity to include other sorts of section-filters, such as
`ones to filter out politics, deaths, etc. in addition to
`PaperBuilder, articles will display the topic filters they
`matched, allowing the reader to immediately add that
`interest to their profile.
`Self Organization: Early in our work, we determined
`that there was a necessity for a mechanism to alter the
`final presentation of the user‘s news. Rather than rely
`on explicit tools for reordering the presentation, we de-
`veloped a system that adapts t.he presentation based on
`the way individuals actually read the paper. While a
`person is reading their paper, the system observes and
`records his/her behavior. On subsequent generations,
`those sections and topic filters that the users paid the
`most attention to in the past will appear closer to the
`top of their paper. These observations are easy to make
`
`~-.“.l..-”-”-.U
`
`~
`
`Fig. 11. PaperBuilder allows the individual to add to his/her
`news profile. A news profile is composed of user-defined sec-
`tions (i.e. “Hometown News,” “Interests”.. .) and within
`each section are news topics that are used to retrieve news
`on behalf of the reader.
`
`with a hypertext interface. Every click of the mouse can
`have an impact on the reader’s and others’ news pre-
`sentation.
`Community Organization: Page One is an example
`of community-based organization. Fishwrap maintains
`a list of articles selected by readers for Page One with
`a counter of how many people read the article. As the
`popularity of the article changes, so does its position
`on Page One (see Figure 4). This community-based
`organization model can be expanded to other parts of
`Fishwrap to help smaller comunities define themselves.
`
`VII. EV.4LUATION
`We have more than five hundred regular readers this
`semester using Fishwrap. We adapted our model to
`allow access from any machine connected to MIT’s net-
`work. We performed focus studies during Spring 1994
`to gauge the acceptance of the system. We also received
`numerous comments from the participants through the
`“comment boxn at the top of each page. This feedback
`from the participants in the experiment was critical to
`the development of our system. For example, students
`initially complained that access to Fishwrap was too
`limited because they had to travel to campus t o w e . a
`workstation capable of running Fishwrap.
`The focus studies examined issues about our inter-
`face and content. Students were generally pleased with
`the system. It tried to fill a niche that they felt was
`missing in the news services that were freely available
`on campus.
`Interface: Students responded favorably to the
`WWW interface. They liked that they could use the
`interface for more than just one purpose. Having three
`levels of depth in the hypertext document was about as
`much as they could endure. The students would have
`
`280
`
`Petitioners Great West Casualty Co., BITCO Gen. Ins. Corp., and BITCO Nat'l Ins. Co.
`Ex. 1031, p. 280
`
`

`
`like abortion. from different viewpoints.
`Przvacy: .4 lot of effort was put into protecting the
`information we collect about individuals. Yet students
`questioned in the focus studies would forego the secu-
`rity to gain greater access to the news service or to share
`material with their friends. We are working on new in-
`terfaces to provide the reader with greater controls in
`this area. Students were concerned that information
`might be given to outside sources (advertisers) without
`their knowledge. They were less concerned with the in-
`formation being used to tailor advertisers' presentations
`within Fishwrap.
`VIII. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`The authors wish to thank Walter E3ender for his con-
`tinued support of this project as part of the News in
`the Future[8] research consortium at the Media Labo-
`ratory. The authors also with to thank The Associated
`Press, Reuters, BPI Entertainment, Knight-Ridder and
`The Boston Globe who provided their news reports to
`enhance the experiment. The freshmen who designed
`the original project were: Brad Bartley, Adam Cot-
`ner. James Deverell, Soloman Douglas, David Malott,
`Stephen hlorales. Wilfred0 Sanchez, and Greg Stark.
`Other members of the crew included: Douglas Koen,
`Brian Shea. Mark Hurst, David La.macchia, Jeffrey
`Rosen. Oliver Roup. Joe Barco, Jack Driscoll and Trip
`Dubard. P.R.C. thanks Felice Napolitano for her pa-
`tient reviews of these documents.
`
`IX. AUTHORS
`Pascal Chesnats is a research specialist with the MIT
`Media Laboratory's News in the Future program. He
`may be reached via email: lacsap@mit.edu
`Matthew Mucklo is a sophomore in the MIT Electrical
`Engineering/Computer Science department. He may be
`reached via email: mmucklo@mit .edu
`Jonathan Sheena is master of engineering candi-
`date in the MIT Electrical Engineering/Computer Sci-
`ence department. He may be reached via email:
`jsheena@mit .edu
`Fishwrap has a publicly accessible World Wide Web
`page located at http://fishwrap.mit.edu/
`
`,
`
`[2]
`
`[3]
`
`REFERENCES
`[I] Chesnais, Pascal R. and Koen, Douglas B. Strategies for
`personal dynamic systems: News in the future NextWORLD
`Expo, San Francisco CA, 1993
`Koen, Douglas B. Automated Restructuring of an Electronic
`Newspaper SB EECS Thesis, MIT, Cambridge MA, 1994
`Abramson, Nathan S. The dtype library or, how to write a
`server in less time than it takes t o read this manual Techni-
`cal Report. Electronic Publishing Group, MIT Media L a b e
`ratoryi Cambridge MA, 1992
`Rlount. Alan W. Bettyserver: More news than you can beat
`wrth a stick Technical report. Electronic Publishing Group,
`MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge MA, 1991
`
`[4)
`
`28 1
`
`Fig. 12. Using the biographical information about the individual
`we can provide personalized weather reports. In Fishwrap.
`we can relate the weather at MIT with your expectations.
`The top two panels reflect a weather report for someone
`from Juneau AI.;. the bottom two for a San Juan PR res-
`ident. This is part of a larger computer generated comic
`strip project called iComix by Mark P. Hurst.
`
`preferred a more linear approach, where they could skim
`one section after another until the presentation was ex-
`hausted. They did appreciate the ease in which one
`could return to familiar parts of the news presentation.
`One blind student appreciated the consistent structure
`and audio segments for illustrations. Students were a
`bit concerned at the lack of a mechanism for changing
`the order of the news presentation. However, the self-
`organization facility seemed to make up for the lack of
`such a tool.
`Content: In the focus studies students expressed con-
`cern that there was no editorial voice to guide the reader
`to important issues. As a result we implemented Page
`One which seems to have adequately addressed this con-
`cern. Students were appreciative of the ability to get
`regional news; in particular, those students from foreign
`coutries and US small towns. Students were pleased
`that there was extensive material on political subjects,
`
`Petitioners Great West Casualty Co., BITCO Gen. Ins. Corp., and BITCO Nat'l Ins. Co.
`Ex. 1031, p. 281
`
`

`
`DelloFera, C. Anthony and Eichen. Mark U’. and French,
`R o b e r t S. and Jedlinsky, David C. and Kohl. John T. and
`Sommerfeld. William E. The Ocphyr notification system
`USENIX, 1988
`Schoon, Benjamin D. Fis hpaper:
`.4 U t om at ic Pers onallzed
`Newspaper Layout SB EECS Thesis, MIT. Cambridge M A .
`1994
`Wire Service Transmrssion Guidelines Special Report S u m -
`ber 84-2 American Newspaper Publishers Association.
`Washington, DC, 1984
`Bender, Walter News in the Future.Proceedings of the ISLT
`4 8 t h Annual Conference, Washington, DC. May 1995
`
`Fig. 13. An article illustrated with photographs.
`
`282
`
`Petitioners Great West Casualty Co., BITCO Gen. Ins. Corp., and BITCO Nat'l Ins. Co.
`Ex. 1031, p. 282

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket