throbber
From:
`To:
`
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Day, Evan S. (SDO)
`Coulson, Chris; Bright, Meghan (SDO); Ng, Chun (SEA); Bernstein, Matthew C. (SDO); Sathe, Vinay (SDO);
`McKeever, Patrick J. (SDO); *Perkins-Service-MSFT-Bradium-IPR
`Zachary, Michael; Ulrich, Clifford
`RE: Microsoft Corp. v. Bradium Tech. // IPR2016-00448 - Correspondence
`Thursday, February 09, 2017 8:44:33 PM
`
`Counsel,
`
`We have received your correspondence today regarding Ex. 1017, and will respond to the issues raised
`in your letter in a reasonable time. However, with respect to your request that Microsoft “immediately
`request that Exhibit 1017 be sealed and that the public version of the declaration be expunged,” this
`request, as made by you, is not reasonable. Obviously we are willing to work with you and are willing to
`consider sealing the declaration if you actually identify specific confidential information contained in the
`declaration. Claiming that 10-18 year old information is confidential, without providing any reasons or
`justification, simply is not reasonable—especially given that Mr. Lavi’s declaration for the most part
`mirrors topics discussed by Mr. Levanon which he and Bradium claim is public, as well as subject matter
`that the named inventors have discussed in materials made publicly available at the PTO on several
`occasions and which Bradium itself has made publicly available in this proceeding. See, e.g. Exs. 2019,
`2020. Therefore, please identify the specific paragraphs (or portions thereof) that you claim contain
`confidential information and the bases therefore, including any agreements upon which your
`confidentiality assertions are based (with English translations if they are not in English).
`
`Moreover, you state that Mr. Lavi’s declaration reveals “confidential corporate information regarding which
`we understand Mr. Lavi is subject to confidentiality obligations based on his employment with
`GACentral.com, 3DVU, Ltd., and 3DVU, Inc.,” not Bradium. As far as we know, your office does not
`represent any entities in this IPR other than Bradium. Neither you nor your firm have entered an
`appearance on behalf of any of these entities in this IPR or any other proceeding. Also, to the best that
`our research has been able to determine, these entities are no longer operational or in good standing
`legally. The information that we have received through the Delaware litigation also gives no indication
`that the assignment of the asserted patents to Bradium conveyed any standing to enforce previous
`confidentiality agreements on behalf of other entities. Please unequivocally state whether your firm
`represents GACentral.com, 3DVU, Ltd., or 3DVU, Inc., whether you are willing to accept service on their
`behalf moving forward, and whether these entities legally still exist.
`
`Again, we are willing to consider your request and work with you if you provide the requested information.

`Best regards,
`Evan
`
`Evan Day | Perkins Coie LLP
`11988 El Camino Real Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130-2594
`D. +1.858.720.5743
`F. +1.858.720.5799
`E. EDay@perkinscoie.com
`
`From: Coulson, Chris [mailto:CCoulson@kenyon.com]
`Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2017 2:38 PM
`To: Bright, Meghan (SDO); Ng, Chun (SEA); Bernstein, Matthew C. (SDO); Sathe, Vinay (SDO);
`McKeever, Patrick J. (SDO); Day, Evan S. (SDO); *Perkins-Service-MSFT-Bradium-IPR
`Cc: Zachary, Michael; Ulrich, Clifford
`Subject: RE: Microsoft Corp. v. Bradium Tech. // IPR2016-00448 - Correspondence

`Counsel,

`Please see the attached correspondence.
`
`Microsoft, Ex. 1040
`Microsoft v. Bradium, IPR2016-00449
`
`

`

`  
`
`Best regards,

`Chris Coulson
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP
`Tel: 212.908.6409

`From: Bright, Meghan (Perkins Coie) [mailto:MBright@perkinscoie.com]
`Sent: Monday, February 06, 2017 9:39 PM
`To: Coulson, Chris; Zachary, Michael; Ulrich, Clifford; ~~Bradium v. Microsoft
`Cc: Ng, Chun (Perkins Coie); Bernstein, Matthew C. (Perkins Coie); Sathe, Vinay (Perkins Coie);
`McKeever, Patrick J. (Perkins Coie); Day, Evan S. (Perkins Coie);
`PerkinsServiceBradiumIPR@perkinscoie.com
`Subject: Microsoft Corp. v. Bradium Tech. // IPR2016-00448 - U.S. Patent No. 7,908,343 // Service of
`Petitioner’s Reply and Related Exhibits

`Re: Inter Partes Review Case No. IPR2016-00448
`Microsoft Corporation v. Bradium Technologies LLC
`U.S. Patent No. 7,908,343
`
`Counsel:
`
`Attached please find service copies of the following documents filed at the PTAB on February 6, 2017
`regarding inter partes review Case No. IPR2016-00448:
`
`
`§ Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response
`§ Exhibits 1014-1020, 1022-1031 (to follow via LeapFile Transfer)
`
`
`Regards,

`Meghan Bright | Perkins Coie LLP
`PARALEGAL
`11988 El Camino Real Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130-2594
`D. +1.858.720.5746
`E. MBright@perkinscoie.com
`

`
`NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the
`sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.
`
`Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email and any attachments to it may be legally
`privileged and include confidential information intended only for the recipient(s) identified above. If you
`are not one of those intended recipients, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
`copying of this email or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error,
`please notify the sender of that fact by return email and permanently delete the email and any
`attachments to it immediately. Please do not retain, copy or use this email or its attachments for any
`purpose, nor disclose all or any part of its contents to any other person. Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
`operates as a Texas limited liability partnership. Andrews Kurth (Middle East) DMCC is registered and
`licensed as a Free Zone company under the rules and regulations of DMCCA. Andrews Kurth Kenyon
`(UK) LLP is authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales (SRA
`Registration No.598542). Thank you.
`
`Microsoft, Ex. 1040
`Microsoft v. Bradium, IPR2016-00449
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket