throbber

`
`Chris J Coulson
`Direct 212.908.6409
`ccoulson@kenyon.com
`
`Andrews Kurth Kenyon LLP
`One Broadway
`New York, NY 10004-1007
`212.425.7200
`Fax 212.425.5288
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`February 9, 2017
`
`By Email to CNg@perkinscoie.com and Counsel of Record for IPR2016-00448
`
`Chun M. Ng, Esq.
`Perkins Coie LLP
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
`Seattle, WA 98101-3099
`
`
`
`
`Re: Microsoft Corp. v. Bradium Technologies LLC, Inter Partes Review Proceeding
`IPR2016-00448 (United States Patent 7,908,343) Exhibit 10107
`
`Counsel:
`
`I write on behalf of Bradium Technologies LLC and Mr. Isaac Levanon regarding Exhibit 1017,
`“Declaration of Yonatan Lavi,” which Petitioner Microsoft publicly filed in Inter Partes Review
`Proceeding IPR2016-00448 (United States Patent 7,908,343).
`
`Our preliminary review1 of Exhibit 1017 indicates that Mr. Lavi’s declaration reveals
`confidential corporate information regarding which we understand Mr. Lavi is subject to
`confidentiality obligations based on his employment with GACentral.com, 3DVU, Ltd., and
`3DVU, Inc., which Mr. Lavi refers to collectively as “3DVU”.
`
`To allow us to complete an investigation of this issue and reduce, to the extent possible at this
`point, any prejudice, I write to request that Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) immediately
`request that Exhibit 1017 be sealed and that the public version of the declaration be expunged.
`
`We further ask that Microsoft, Perkins Coie LLP and Mr. Lavi preserve all documents, including
`e-mail communications, letters, draft declarations, and agreements regarding Microsoft’s contact
`with Mr. Lavi that may have resulted in his publicly revealing 3DVU’s confidential corporate
`information without notice or consent.
`
`It is unclear based on Microsoft’s reply and Mr. Lavi’s declaration whether Perkins Coie LLP is
`representing Mr. Lavi personally, or whether Perkins Coie LLP is representing only Microsoft.
`However, as you have clearly been working closely with Mr. Lavi, we ask that you immediately
`
`1 Although the declaration appears to have been executed on January 31, 2017, we received no
`notice of the declaration or its contents prior to its public filing by Microsoft, which were sent to
`counsel of record at 9:44 p.m. Eastern on Monday, February 6, 2017.
`
`NY01 4341208 v1
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP
`Austin Beijing Dallas Dubai Houston London New York Research Triangle Park Silicon Valley The Woodlands Washington, DC
`
`
`
`
`
`Microsoft, Ex. 1039
`Microsoft v. Bradium, IPR2016-00449
`
`

`

`Chun M. Ng, Esq.
`February 9, 2017
`Page 2
`
`
`
`
`forward this correspondence to Mr. Lavi so that he is aware of the need to preserve, and not
`destroy, relevant documents. Please confirm that you have done this at your earliest opportunity.
`
`Regarding deposition, Bradium requests that Mr. Lavi be made available for deposition in the
`United States at our New York office at One Broadway, New York, New York, 10004 on March
`2, 2017. See 37 C.F.R. 42.53; Square, Inc. v. REM Holdings 3, LLC, Case No. IPR2014-00312,
`Paper 37 (PTAB, Dec. 9, 2014) (Order) (declarant residing outside of the United States required
`to travel to the United States for deposition). Although we will endeavor to complete Mr. Lavi’s
`deposition within a single day, Mr. Lavi should remain available in New York on Friday, March
`3, 2017 because, given the volume and nature of the materials in Mr. Lavi’s 31-page declaration
`(which includes six exhibits that total 40 pages), there is a significant chance that his deposition
`will need to continue on Friday, March 3.
`
`
`
`Very truly yours,
`
`/s/ Chris J. Coulson
`
`Chris J. Coulson
`
`
`NY01 4341208 v1
`
`Microsoft, Ex. 1039
`Microsoft v. Bradium, IPR2016-00449
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket