throbber
From:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Date:
`
`Coulson, Chris
`"Day, Evan S. (Perkins Coie)"
`Ng, Chun (Perkins Coie); Bernstein, Matthew C. (Perkins Coie); PerkinsServiceBradiumIPR@perkinscoie.com;
`Ulrich, Clifford; Zachary, Michael
`Microsoft Corp. v. Bradium Tech. // IPR2016-00448, -00449: Request that Microsoft Withdraw Ex. 1017 (Lavi
`Decl.)
`Wednesday, March 01, 2017 7:45:59 PM
`
`Dear Evan,
`
`As Microsoft has failed to timely offer Mr. Lavi for deposition in the United States, Bradium
`requests that Microsoft voluntarily withdraw Mr. Lavi’s declaration (Ex. 1017) and the
`material that relies on his declaration, including at least Paper 34, Pages 2-3, 15-16, 23-26.
`If Microsoft does not timely withdraw these materials, Bradium will seek relief from the
`Board to exclude these materials and have them expunged from the record.
`
`To be clear, given the nature of Mr. Lavi’s assertions, and the volume and type of material
`he addresses in his 31-page declaration and 40 pages of accompanying exhibits, Bradium
`could not agree to a foreign deposition of Mr. Lavi. Further, the travel time and time-zone
`changes involved in the round-trip to Israel renders a deposition there infeasible for us, and
`that is especially the case at this late date. It is unclear how Microsoft’s Hague Convention
`proposal would be workable at this point, and the lack of detail in your Feb. 28 proposal
`does not alleviate this concern.
`
`Bradium has been reasonable in providing time for Microsoft to provide a deposition date in
`the United States. As an initial matter, Microsoft sought and took Mr. Levanon’s deposition
`in the United States, and must have been aware that the rules contemplate that Mr. Lavi,
`too, be deposed in the United States. Bradium requested that Mr. Lavi be made available
`for deposition in the United States via my February 9, 2017 letter. I followed up on this
`request in my February 13 letter. At my request, we met and conferred by telephone on
`Wednesday, February 15, 2017. I reiterated during that meet-and-confer that Bradium is
`not agreeable to a foreign deposition, but instead requests that Mr. Lavi physically travel to
`the United States. I further offered that Bradium would be agreeable to a reasonable
`extension, but I asked that you advise as soon as possible if Microsoft became aware that
`Mr. Lavi would not be timely made available in the United States. I received no response at
`all, however, until your e-mail below, almost two weeks after our meet-and-confer. Your
`late response provides no details or proposed schedule for deposition.
`
`Bradium disagrees with your characterization of my letters and our conversations. Mr. Lavi’s
`wide-ranging assertions and personal attacks are made without supporting evidence and on
`their face are not credible. It no surprise that Mr. Lavi does not wish to face questioning on
`the statements in his declaration. You did not mention anything about Mr. Lavi’s “concerns”
`during our meet-and-confer, and your Feb. 28 e-mail is the first time you are raising this
`(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:27)(cid:19)(cid:3)
`(cid:37)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:88)(cid:80)(cid:3)(cid:55)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:81)(cid:82)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:74)(cid:76)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:47)(cid:47)(cid:38)(cid:3)(cid:16)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)
`(cid:48)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:16)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)
`(cid:44)(cid:51)(cid:53)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:25)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:23)49
`
`1
`
`

`

`issue. I note that Microsoft obtained Mr. Lavi’s declaration by seeking out, and then
`publishing, information from this former employee without notice or permission. I further
`note that refused to promptly seal Mr. Lavi’s declaration as I requested on February 9th.
`
`Best regards,
`
`Chris Coulson
`ANDREWS KURTH KENYON LLP
`Tel: 212.908.6409
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket