throbber
UNDER ARMOUR,INC. vs. ADIDAS AG
`William R. Michalson, Ph.D. on 02/05/2016
`
`Page 1
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
` BOARD BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL
`
`Under Armour, Inc.,
`
`
`
` Petitioner
`
`M3
`
`
`
`Adidas AG,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`
` Case No.
`IPR2015-00698
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent No. 8,092,345
`
`DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM R. MICHALSON, Ph.D.
`
`
`
`
` FEBRUARY 5, 2016
`9:45 A.M.
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`1100 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E.
`SUITE 2800
`
`ATLANTA, GEORGIA
`
` SUZANNE BEASLEY, RPR
`
`CCR-B-1184
`
`
`
` www.huseby.com
`Huseby, Inc. Regional Centers
`Charlotte ~ Atlanta ~ Washington, DC ~ New York ~ Hous
`
`Exhibit 2075
`
`Bradium Technologies LLC - patent owner
`
`Microsoft Corporation - petitioner
`IPR2016-00448
`
`4
`
`1
`
`

`

`UNDER ARMOUR,INC. vs. ADIDAS AG
`Page 1
`William R. Michalson, Ph.D. on 02/05/2016
`
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
` Under Armour,
`
`Petitioner
`
`M3
`
`
`
`
`Adidas AG,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`LMC .,
`
`
`
`
`Case No.
`
`IPR2015-00698
`
` Patent No. 8,092,345 DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM R. MICHALSON, Ph.D.
`
`
`
` FEBRUARY 5,
`2016
`9:45 A.M.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`
`
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`
`1100 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E.
`SUITE 2800
`
`
`
`ATLANTA, GEORGIA
`
`SUZANNE BEASLEY, RPR
`CCR-B-1184
`
`
`
`800-333-2082
`Huseby, Inc. Regional Centers
`www.huseby.com
`Charlotte ~ Atlanta ~ Washington, DC ~ New York ~ Houston ~ San Francisco
`UA-1012.001
`
`4
`
`1
`
`

`

`products is plainly demonstrated by the number of
`
`And in particular if you go ta
`Q.
`paragraph 75, you state that MapMyFitness is evidence
`of commercial suceess; is that correct?
`A,
`I don't see the particular turn of phrase
`you used.
`Soxxy.
`a,
`I was just asking you to confirm
`that you lay out your evidence for what -- for your
`opinion that the MapMyPitness mobile applications are
`evidence of commercial success.
`Is that correct?
`
`INDEX TO EXAMINATION
`
`Examination
`
`Page No.
`
`By Mr. Ansley ....-.- cece eee e eee ee eeee 4
`
`INDEX TO EXHIBITS
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Exhibit 2002
`Declaration cf William R.
`Michalson, Ph.D.
`
`APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL:
`On behalf of the Petitioner:
`W. SUTTON ANSLEY, Esq.
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`2300 Eye Street, N.W.
`Suite 900
`
`Washington, D.c.
`(202) 682-7018
`
`20005-3314
`
`sutton, ansley@weil.com
`
`On behalf of the Patent Owner and the Witness:
`JONATHAN D. GLINGER, Esq.
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1100 Peachtree Street, N.E.
`Suite 2800
`
`Atlanta, Georgia
`(404) 815-6509
`
`30308
`
`jolinger@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`wooOoYhHhkeowotoe
`hePpPeeBWwNFoO
`
`weoTHKwnfeWwWHPR
`NOMONNMONNMBPFPFFEFPPPHPPPRBnfWNYFBDbbowtTAbFYeH
`
`UNDER ARMOUR, INC.vs. ADIDAS AG
`William R. Mickalson, Ph.D. on 02/05/2016
`Page Z
`
`Pages 2..5
`Page 4
`
`(The signature of the witness to the
`deposition was reserved. }
`WILLIAM R. MICHALSON, Ph.D,
`having been duly sworn, was examined and testified
`as follows:
`
`EXAMINATION
`
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`Q.
`A.
`
`Hello again, Dr. Michalson.
`Helle.
`
`We just concluded the deposition for IPR
`Q.
`proceeding that ends in 697, Now we're moving on to
`the IPR proceeding that ends in 698 for U.S. Patent
`No. 9,092,345.
`
`Again,
`
`same miles as last time. You
`
`understand?
`A,
`
`Yes.
`
`(Exhibit 2002 was marked for
`identification.)
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`So I've already handed you Exhibit 2002.
`Q.
`Are you familiar with this decument?
`A,
`Yes.
`
`Let's turn to page 35. And in Section B
`Q.
`you provide analysis of secondary considerations; is
`that correct?
`
`A.
`
`That's correct.
`
`Page 5
`
`And let's turn to paragraph 74. And in 74
`Q.
`you mention the MapMyFitness mebile applications and
`state, "It is my conclusion that the commercial
`success of these mobile applications supports a
`finding that the instituted claims are not obvious."
`Do you see that?
`A,
`Yes.
`
`On paragraph 75 I elaborate on that
`A.
`opinion, yes.
`And then in paragraph 77 you state
`Q.
`Okay.
`that -- sorry, I've got the wrong paragraph here.
`Give me one second.
`
`All right, 76. You state in your opinicn,
`the commercial success of the MapMyFitness suite of
`
`wooaMNWFmewe
`NowMM&weeBeBBeeRoPoPoPopmeeMFoObbwDTHWeWwNMHP
`weramwiteWwWNM
`NNNNNNMFEFPEHPePPPeoe )
`
`800-333-2082
`Huseby, Inc. Regional Centers
`www.huseby.com
`Charlotte ~ Atlanta ~ Washington, DC ~ New York ~ Houston ~ San Francisco
`UA-1012.002
`
`2
`
`

`

`indlsbo
`
`UNDER ARMOUR,INC.ys. ADIDAS AG
`William R. Michalson, Ph.D. on 02/05/2016
`Page 6
`MapMyFitness users and Under Armour's purchase of
`MapMyFitness. Do you see that?
`A.
`I do.
`Q.
`So hypothetically would the profitability
`of MapMyFitness as a company be a relevant factor in
`your opinion to determining whether its products were
`commercially successful or not?
`MR. OLINGER: Objection.
`Outside the scope.
`THE WETNESS: Can you state that
`question again?
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`Pages 6..9
`Page 8
`
`the profitability of a
`hypothetically,
`company may be due to a number of factors.
`T would have to analyze what that -- 1
`would have to leok and see what that
`profitability was due to. That's not what
`I'm talking about here in paragraph 76.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`I understand you're not talking about that
`Q.
`here, Well, so you mentioned two things. Again,
`it's the mumber of MMF users and Under Armour's
`
`Purchase of MMF would be the two factors that you
`considered.
`
`Would there be any other factors that you
`would want information -- I'm sorry.
`Would there be any other information that
`you would want te see to assess whether or not the
`MapMyFitness suite of products are commercially
`successful?
`
`MR. OLINGER: Objection, For,
`Outside the scope.
`THE WITNESS:
`
`I wasn't asked to
`
`consider any other factors and I didn't
`consider any other factors. You know, if
`there were more factors that were brought
`to my attention or that I obtained, I would
`
`consider them, but I did not do that
`analysis.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`De you consider yourself an expert in
`Q.
`evaluating whether a product is a commercial success?
`MR. OLINGER: Cbjection.
`Form.
`THE WITNESS:
`I have in the past been
`asked to provide opinions about technology
`and likelihood of success of technologies
`offered by different companies, both, you
`know, by entrepreneurial groups and also in
`some of my own endeavors trying tc do
`technical evaluations of companies and my
`assessment of likelihood of their
`
`So I certainly have some
`longevity.
`experience in that area.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`Well, I didn't ask you if you had
`Q.
`experience in the area.
`I asked you if you consider
`yourself an expert in evaluating whether a product is
`a commercial success or not.
`
`Form.
`MR. OLINGER: Objection,
`THE WITNESS:
`I think that I have
`engugh knowledge abont the field te be able
`to leok at some of the typical indicators
`
`bowonnmWeWwWWH
`
`o
`
`PPRinoNOe
`
`Bi
`Rrun
`wenn
`raae
`weoo
`rRto
`weco
`~rary
`
`NMNhWwhe
`
`bha
`mwiw
`
`wowHweWwWKhOH
`
`Be°
`ry
`bebo
`-a
`Poeoe
`
`amn
`w=~]
`pwoo
`
`wonwhMeWYBSFe
`
`o
`
`Moewk
`
`aRs
`rayan
`ian
`eJ
`aoy
`bewo
`teo
`boBe
`
`boohmwto
`
`Noeca
`boin
`
`wowonnhinhFFWwWWBFH
`
`io
`HH
`behe
`phtel
`
`HWne
`
`ba
`»1
`
`teomoeowa
`
`bhB
`
`Form.
`
`So you mention two factors here.
`Sure.
`Q.
`In paragraph 76 you state that commercial success is
`demonstrated, A, by the number of MMF users, and, B,
`Under Armour's purchase of MapMyFitness.
`And my question is hypothetically would
`the profitability of MapMyFitness as a company be a
`relevant factor in your opinion to determining
`whether its products were a commercial success?
`MR, OLINGER: Chjection.
`Form.
`Cutside the scope.
`In paragraph 76 I'm not
`THE WITNESS:
`referring to the profitability of
`MapMyFitness.
`I'm referring to the number
`
`Page 7
`
`of users they aceumtlated and the fact that
`Under Armour purchased the company.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`I understand that, but I'm asking a
`Qa.
`hypothetical. Would the profitability of
`MapMyFitness be a relevant factor in your
`consideration if you have that information available
`to you?
`
`Form.
`
`MR. OLINGER: Objectien.
`Outside the scope.
`THE WITNESS: Well, hypothetically if
`I had the information available to me, I
`would review that information and determine
`
`if it appeared as if it made -- if it was
`also an indicator of commercial success.
`
`Without that information I can't really do
`that analysis.
`I would have to do that
`analysis.
`BY MR, ANSLEY:
`
`So without that information, you can't say
`Q.
`one way or another whether or not the company's
`profitability would be a relevant factor?
`MR. OLINGER: Objection.
`Form.
`Outside the scope.
`THE WITNESS: Again speaking
`
`800-333-2082
`Huseby, Inc. Regional Centers
`www.huseby.com
`Charlotte ~ Atlanta ~ Washington, DC ~ New York ~ Houston ~ San Francisco
`UA-1012.003
`
`3
`
`3
`
`

`

`UNDER ARMOUR, INC. ys. ADIDAS AG
`William R. Michalson, Ph.D. on 02/05/2016
`Page 10
`of success and determine if that, you know,
`at least represents to me something that is
`commercially successful.
`BY MR, ANSLEY:
`
`Do you have any expertise in evaluating
`
`Pages 10..13
`Page 12
`
`Form.
`
`MR. OLINGER: Objection.
`Outside the scope.
`I don't recall if I've
`THE WITNESS:
`lecked at those details or not.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`80 if there's any confidential information
`Q.
`you don't want to disclose, just let me know, but if
`you are aware of confidential information I'd ask you
`not to disclose that here.
`
`But your testimony is you don't recall
`whether you've seen how Under Armour came to the
`conclusion that MapMyFitness was worth $150 million?
`Yon can answer.
`
`I'm trying to hear the
`MR. OLINGER:
`question so I can decide whether or not to
`make an objection.
`I'm not preventing him
`answering.
`Form.
`Objection.
`THE WITNESS: Can you ask the
`question again, please?
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`So you testified that you do not
`Sure.
`Q.
`recall if you leoked at the details of how
`Under Armour calculated the §15¢ million for the
`purchase price of MapMyFitness; is that correct?
`
`A.
`
`That's correct.
`
`Page 13
`
`So you don't know here, sitting here,
`Qa.
`whether they paid $149 million for capital
`investments, employees, know-how,
`things like that,
`and $1 millien fer the product itself, the underlying
`technology of the product itself?
`MR, OLINGER;
`Form.
`Objection.
`THE WITNESS:
`Offhand I doen't recall
`that breakdown.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`And you don't cite any evidence in your
`Q.
`declaration about how that evidence was calculated,
`
`do you?
`
`Form.
`MR, OLINGER: Objection.
`THE WITNESS:
`I don't believe so.
`BY MR, ANSLEY:
`
`Q.
`
`BY MR, ANSLEY:
`Q.9But you don't know one way or the other
`how this $150 million was calewlated?
`Q.
`So let's talk about the purchase of
`MR. OLINGER: Objection to form,
`MapMyFitness by Under Armour.
`In the end of
`THE WITNESS: As I said, I don't
`paragraph 75 you state, "In December 2013
`recall if I've seen that breakdewn or not,
`Under Amour acquired MapMyFitness for $150 million."
`but sitting here today, I don't recall how
`Do you see that?
`A.
`Yes.
`that was calculated.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`woranweWwWwbe
`NMNMMMwePRPBPPPPPYneWwwSobywamhokWwWNHSD
`wowswnmweWwWWweH
`MMNMNMMHPHPPYeeepSeopSUMFobfoaAmewBPGS
`
`
`
`So you said you think given enough
`Q.
`knowledge about the field.
`Is it your testimony then
`under oath that you think you're an expert in
`evaluating whether a product is a commercial success?
`MR, OLINGER: Objection.
`THE WITNESS:
`1 stand by what I say
`in paragraph 76.
`I'm offering an opinion
`that based on the number of MMF users and
`
`the purchase of MMF, that it appears that
`those products were at least successful
`enough to get bought up. And presumably
`Under Armour would not have purchased MMF
`if they didn't think they were gaing to
`make money with that suite of products.
`BY MR, ANSLEY:
`
`I want to get to that in a second, that
`Q.
`last thing you said, but so you're not saying one way
`or the other whether you're an expert or not in
`evaluating the commercial success of products?
`MR. OLINGER: Objection.
`Form.
`THE WItNESS:
`I'm not evaluating the
`
`Page 1
`
`commercial success in the same sense that
`
`somebody who's in the business of
`evaluating the business aspects of
`comanies would evaluate those companies.
`I'm looking at, you know,
`the number of
`users.
`I'm looking at,’ you know,
`the
`purchase,
`the feedback that I've eited in
`this report. And in my opinion,
`those
`things are indicators of commercial
`success.
`
`And so this is one of the bases, one of
`Q.
`the two bases for your opinion that the MapMyFitness
`suite of products has been a comercial success?
`A,
`Correct.
`
`Do you know how MapMyFitness,
`Q.
`valuation for -- strike that.
`
`the
`
`Do you know how the $150 million valuation
`was calculated?
`
`wowosHDiSFWwWWYFE
`NWNHNRPPPRFBePPPooFOePobeaAeeNSOBOG
`wooaDHWeWwWBweH
`NNMNNMNPYPYPPPPPBeOneWwYPoYeoAkewwPS
`
`800-333-2082
`Huseby, Inc. Regional Centers
`www.huseby.com
`Charlotte ~ Atlanta ~ Washington, DC ~ New York ~ Houston ~ San Francisco
`UA-1012.004
`
`4
`
`

`

`company should be?
`
`oraAUWFFWwWhwHF
`NMNMNONwRBPFEBeSREGORBRSERRREREESE
`wonAWeWwNMH
`PRPREPNMPEREERPEEREEoFWwhwHYOoweweasmHlnmeiwBe©
`
`whether a product -- sorry.
`De you have any expertise in valuing
`
`companies?
`
`MR. OLINGER: Cbjection.
`THE WITNESS: Companies, no.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`Form.
`
`And have you ever evaluated a
`Q.
`company -- I'm assuming then you've never evaluated a
`company based on the commercial success of its
`products;
`is that correct?
`Form.
`MR. GLINGER: Objection.
`THE WITNESS:
`I don't think that's
`
`entirely correct, but I want to be careful.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`Well, you said you've never had any
`Q.
`experience evaluating companies, so I mean logically
`it must follow that you've never had any experience
`valuating companies based an the commercial success
`of the products; isn't that right?
`Form.
`MR. OLINGER: Objection.
`THE WITNESS: Let me be careful and
`The
`
`clarify what I'm thinking about here.
`phrase "evaluating companies" --
`BY MR. ANSLEY;
`
`0.
`
`Valuating.
`
`Page 15
`the
` Valuating companies has, you know,
`A.
`connotation of determining what the company is worth,
`you know,
`in the market, if you will,
`1 have
`certainly evaluated companies based on their products
`and success of their products in determining whether
`new product offerings stand a chance of surviving in
`the marketplace.
`That piece I have done.
`When you say "evaluating," do you mean
`Q.
`assigning a number to that product?
`MR. OLINGER: Objection.
`Form,
`Objection,
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`Vague.
`
`Q.
`
`And by number, I mean a dollar amount.
`MR. OLINGER: Objection,
`Form.
`THE WITNESS: Most of my experience
`in that area has been on the purchase of
`technology from a company, so determining
`what the dollar value of a product is now,
`what its likely trajectory and cost would
`be, what its likelihood of success would
`be, is something that I've certainly dealt
`with. And sometimes that involves seeing
`how the company has worked with other
`products,
`
`UNDER ARMOUR, INC. vs. ADIDAS AG
`William R. Michalson, Ph.D. on 02/05/2016
`Page 14
`
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`Pages 14.17
`Page 16
`
`I'm confused on what you said. You said,
`Q.
`"Most of my experience in that area has been on the
`
`purchase of technology from a company." Do you mean
`that you've actually purchased technology from a
`company?
`In what sense do you mean?
`A.
`I've been in --
`
`MR. OLINGER: Objection to form.
`THE WITNESS:
`I've been involved with
`
`startups that may need to acquire
`technology and try to get -- te try to hit
`certain cross-targets.
`Sometimes that's
`relatively new technology and there may be
`multiple competiters in that technology
`niche, so I've certainly reviewed competing
`technologies,
`reviewed the companies that
`are offering competing technologies, and
`tried to provide advice based oan those
`evaluations that I've made.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`So how many startups have you been
`Q.
`involved with in this role?
`
`Form.
`MR. OLINGER: Objection.
`THE WITNESS; Startups of my own,
`I have also been contacted two or
`
`two.
`
`three times by others to, you know,
`evaluate a technology.
`BY MR. ANSTEY:
`
`So you have been involved in
`All right.
`Q.
`two of your own startups and you've been contacted
`two ox three times about evaluating technologies; is
`that correct?
`A.
`Correct.
`
`Q.
`Okay. Let's talk about two of those
`startups.
`Did you ever assign a dollar amount to
`your company on any cf those two startups?
`MR. OLINGER: Objection.
`Form.
`Outside the scope.
`THE WITNESS: On the first of those
`
`startups, we did develop a business plan.
`I participated in the development of that
`business plan, and part of that involved
`determining what we thought the value of
`the company would be at start when we were
`trying to pursue venture funding.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`80 you say you participated in the
`Q.
`business plan. Did you actually -- did you actually
`develop, work on developing what the value of the
`
`wedHWofWwHM
`PREPPPPPeewowPymhWe|NwFF
`
`womhmieWYhe
`NNNMNNNPPPPPPPeeMWeWwNMPooePmaymHnkweYF
`
`www.huseby.com
`Huseby, Inc. Regional Centers
`800-333-2082
`Charlotte ~ Atlanta ~ Washington, DC ~ New York ~ Housten ~ San Francisco
`UA-1012.005
`
`5
`
`5
`
`

`

`accumulate information about what we thought our
`costs were going to be, what we thought our sales
`numkers were going to be, and, you mow, we worked
`with that small business advisor, you know, to
`develop a marketing plan and a, you know, basically a
`business development plan that would allow us te go
`out and seek funding, and that included coming up
`with an idea of the value of our company in the
`marketplace.
`I don't recall all the specific detaiis of
`what we did.
`I'd have to go back through my notes
`and leck at that business plan again, but I know that
`myself and one other person wrote the majority of
`
`MapMyFitness application is and has been a commercial
`
`UNDER ARMOUR,INC, vs. ADIDAS AG
`William R. Michalson, Ph.D. on 02/05/2016
`Page 18
`
`Pages 18..21
`Page 20
`Can you ask the question again, please.
`A.
`Sure,
`You said
`Q.
`I just want to summarize.
`that you had two startups of your own and that you've
`been contacted two ox three times by -- was it by
`startups?
`It was by somebody that was involved with
`A.
`venture capital that was evaluating proposals that
`were in front of them.
`
`Simple question. Did you ever run
`Okay.
`Q.
`the calculations -- I understand you said you were
`involved. Did you ever actually run the calculations
`of what the value of any of these companies are?
`Form.
`MR, OLINGER: Objection.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`It's a simple yes or no.
`Q.
`It's a simple yes or no for you, but I'm
`A.
`rolling back 20 years and thinking about the one that
`I was most closely involved with calculations there.
`I'm sure that I worked with those
`
`spreadsheets and adjusted numbers in those
`spreadsheets, which would result in different
`valuations for the company, so when you say did I
`actually run those numbers, I think the answer
`probably is yes, but I'd have to go back, and we're
`talking 20 years ago.
`
`Page 21
`Sure. But you're talking about editing
`Q.
`certain fields on a spreadsheet; is that right?
`A.
`But also understanding how those fields
`impacted other fields and --
`Q,
`I understood that.
`A,
`-- seeing what those calculations were and
`developing some understanding of what that process
`was.
`
`So if the question is have I ever run
`those calculations, I think the answer is probably
`yes.
`
`Ckay. Of the $150 million that
`Q.
`Under Armour paid for MapMyFitness, how much do you
`think of that $150 million was attributable to the
`MapMyFitness products?
`Form.
`MR. OLINGER: Objection,
`THE WITNESS: Sitting here today, I
`don't Imow.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`Let's assume hypothetically that
`Q.
`MapMyFitness exceeded Under Ammour's expectation in
`terms of performance since the acquisition, okay?
`It's just a hypothetical. Would that be a relevant
`consideration for you in judging whether the
`
`weamMWewehe
`WoWNMNNHOPPREPBEPoeoeoemFWwNPoOWwWmwHYmoDeSYeeYY
`woOdnokeww
`BmPNYYPPPPPPPeeoeneWwNFPOooHDMBwwmHOeHYweHY
`
`iowowDWFfWwWNYHP
`NNNBMHPPeBeepoPoPoPnomWweFPoODbeoambkowohRPoO
`owe1HDweWtBWoe
`wenheNNNPPPPPPPPPinomWwWNWFPOowb)teWwmHWeWYhrGS
`
`Form,
`
`MR. OLINGER: Objection,
`Gutside the scope.
`THE WITNESS: Not solely, but I was
`involved in that process.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`How were you involved?
`Q.
`We're rolling back the clock quite a ways
`A.
`here. Myself and another of the principals of that
`company had several meetings with -- there was a
`sttall business development. council in Worcester,
`Massachusetts that we also worked with, and we would
`accumulate information about the market. We would
`
`that plan.
`Q.
`
`Why did you use a small business advisor?
`Form,
`MR. OLINGER: Objection.
`THE WITNESS: Because it was a new
`
`Page 19
`
`
`
`group that had formed at Clark University.
`They were a free sexvice.
`‘They were
`another set of eyes to Look at what we were
`thinking. They were able to identify
`certain things that we missed.
`They also had an army of graduate
`students that were able to assist us in
`
`doing some of our research as we were
`So it was a
`putting together that plan.
`helpful resource and it was locally
`And I
`available and it was low cost.
`
`forget who referred us to them, but it was
`basically on a reference.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`So I understand that you were
`Q.
`involved -- you say that you've been involved in
`valuing your own company, your own two startups, and
`you've been contacted two or three times about
`startups?
`A,
`Q.
`
`Well, I had a colleague who was --
`Yes, just keep it short. That's fine.
`
`800-333-2082
`Huseby, Inc. Regional Centers
`www.huseby.com
`Charlotte ~ Atlanta ~ Washington, DC ~ New York ~ Houston ~ San Francisco
`UA-1012.006
`
`6
`
`

`

`MR. OLINGER: Objection.
`Outside the scope.
`THE WITNESS: Well, again,
`hypothetically there are a lot of factors
`that may be involved, so you'd have to
`study the situation.
`I've not been asked
`to do that analysis so I haven't done that
`analysis.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`BE wo
`
`UNDER ARMOUR, INC. vs. ADIDAS AG
`William R. Michalson, Ph.D. on 02/05/2016
`Page 22
`
`Pages 22..25
`Page 24
`ERRATA SHEET
`Pursuant to Rule 30(e) of the Federal Rules of
`Civil Procedure and/or the Official Code of Georgia
`Annotated 3-11-30(e} any changes in form or substance
`which you Gesire to make to your deposition testimony
`shall be entered upon the deposition with a statement
`of the reasons given for making them,
`
`To assist you in making any such corrections,
`please use the form below. If supplemental or
`additional pages are necessary, please furnish same
`and attach them to this errata sheet.
`
`the undersigned, WILLIAM R. MICHALSON, Ph.D.,
`I,
`do hereby certify that I have read the foregoing
`deposition and that to the best of my knowledge said
`deposition is true and accurate (with the exception
`of the following corrections listed below).
`
`Line
`Page.
`Reason for change:
`
`should read:
`
`Pages Line.
`Reason for change:
`
`should read;
`
`Pages Line.
`Reason for change:
`
`should read:
`
`Line
`Page
`Reason for change:
`
`should read:
`
`Line
`Page
`Reason for change:
`
`should read:
`
`Line
`Page
`Reason for change;
`
`should read;
`
`should read:
`Line
`Page
`Reason for change:See
`
`Line
`Page
`Reason for change:
`
`should read:
`
`Line
`Page
`Reason for change:
`
`should read:
`
`Line
`Bage
`Reasen for change:
`
`should read:
`
`Signature
`
`Sworn to and Subseribed hefore me
`
`day of
`This
`My Commission Expires:
`
`, Notary Public.
`'
`
`success if it outperformed its expectations?
`Form,
`MR. OLINGER: Objection,
`Outside the scope.
`THE WITNESS: Well, hypothetically it
`way be a consideration, but I'd have to
`study that to determine how much it
`mattered, if it mattered.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`And then the opposite, is it your opinion
`Q.
`that if MapMyFitness was underperforming, it might be
`a consideration, but you'd have to again study that
`data?
`
`Form,
`
`So you were just asked to look at the
`Q.
`$150 million purchase price and the number of users,
`and based on those two data points, you concluded
`that the MapMyFitness suite of products is a
`
`commercial success; is that right?
`Form.
`MR. OLINGER: Objection.
`THE WITNESS: That's one of the
`
`things that I did when we're talking about
`paragraphs 75 and 76 right now.
`I mean,
`there's other material in my report.
`BY MR. ANSLEY:
`
`But you didn't ask to see any other data
`Q.
`in evaluating whether MapMyFitness is a commercial
`success?
`
`MR. OLINGER: Chijection.
`Qutside the scope.
`THE WITNESS: Relative to those
`
`Form.
`
`paragraphs that we're discussing, no.
`MR. ANSLEY: No more questions.
`MR, OLINGER: Let's take a brief
`
`five-minute break, please.
`(A recess was taken.)
`MR. OLINGER: No questions fer this
`witness.
`We consider the deposition
`closed.
`
`(Deposition concluded at 10:25 a.m.)
`
`wowsmWFFwwNM
`BRRPPPBPPeoanankhWYfePo
`
`BobbobweMeHYoo
`
`wooaHwtheewwhtHP
`NNNMOMMNHPPPRPPFrHmemeWNFPOoibmemWmWe
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 3 o
`
`b
`
`MPPFeHepepfOowwPmyOieWwWhb
`
`BeODGeoF
`NNOwweWw
`
`www.huseby.com
`Huseby, Inc. Regional Centers
`800-333-2082
`Charlotte ~ Atlanta ~ Washington, DC ~ New York ~ Houston ~ San Francisco ©
`UA-1012.007
`
`7
`
`

`

`UNDER ARMOUR, INC. vs. ADIDAS AG
`William R. Michalson, Ph.D. on 02/05/2016
`
`CERTIFICATE
`
`GEORGIA:
`FULTON COUNTY:
`
`I hereby certify that the
`foregoing deposition was reported, as
`stated in the caption, and the questions
`and answers thereto were reduced to the
`
`written page under my direction; that the
`foregoing pages 1 through 23 represent a
`true and correct transcript of the evidence
`
`I further certify that I am not in
`given.
`any way financially interested in the
`result of said case,
`
`Page 27
`
`I was contacted by the offices
`Inc,
`to provide court reporting
`of Huseby,
`services for this deposition.
`I will not
`be taking this deposition under any
`contract that is prohibited by 0.C.G.A.
`15-14-37 (a) ox {b).
`I have no written contract to
`
`provide reporting services with any party
`to the case, any counsel in the case, or.
`any reporter or reporting agency from whom
`a referral might have been made to cover
`this deposition.
`I will charge my usual
`and customary rates to all parties in the
`case.
`
`This,
`
`the 10th day of February, 2016.
`
`SUZANNE BEASLEY, B-1184
`My commission expires on the
`24th day of August, 2018.
`
`ae
`
`oOowfF1HhWhwNMOH
`
`eanikwNe
`
`Pursuant to Rules and Regulations
`of the Board of Court Reporting of the
`Judicial Council of Georgia, I make the
`following disclosure:
`I am a Georgia Certified Court
`I am here as an independent
`Reporter.
`contractor for Huseby,
`Inc.
`
`Pages 26..27
`
`800-333-2082
`Huseby, Inc. Regional Centers
`www.huseby.com
`Charlotte ~ Atlanta ~ Washington, DC ~ New York ~ Houston ~ San Francisco
`UA-1012.008
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket