throbber
TIEl.4/93-88
`
`Standards Project:
`
`T1E1.4: ADSL
`
`Title:
`
`Source:
`
`Recommended Procedures for Exchange of
`DMT Loading Information in ADSL
`
`Amati Communications Corporation
`
`J.A.C. Bingham and P.S. Chow
`101 University Ave., Suite 100
`Palo Alto, CA 94301
`Ph:
`415-617-8982
`fax: 415-327-ADSL (2375)
`
`Date:
`
`April 15, 1993
`
`Distribution to:
`
`T1E1.4
`
`Abstract:
`
`This paper is a continuation and an expansion of TIE 1.4/93-022. It describes, in more,
`though not yet complete, detail, that part of the initialization procedure for an ADSL system
`implemented by DMT that is concerned with feedback to each transmitter of the calculated bits and
`powers.
`
`NOTICE
`
`This contribution has been prepared to assist Standards Committee TI-Telecommunications;
`it is offered to the committee as a basis for discussion and is not a binding proposal on Amati
`Communications Corp. The requirements and recommendations may be changed after further
`study. Amati specifically reserves the right to add to, amend, or withdraw the statements contained
`herein.
`
`

`
`Recommended Procedure for Exchange
`of DMT Loading Information in ADSL
`
`I.Introduction
`
`In order to achieve the best possible performance from a DMT ADSL system on a wide
`variety of subscriber lines, three essential parts of the initialization procedure are
`(a) Measurement, in the two receivers, of the S"N"R * in all used sub-bands. The
`recommended procedure for this has been outlined in TIEl.4193-022, and is described in detail in
`TIE1.4/93-087.
`
`(b) Calculation of the optimum distribution of bits, and available transmit power among the
`sub-carriers (hi and gi, for ;=1 to Ne, where Ne = 256 at the CO and 64 at the RT). Two algorithms
`have been described in [1,2], but neither is totally satisfactory. Better algorithms have been, and
`will continue to be, developed; since, however, they are not essential for the design of a compatible
`ADSL unit, they will probably remain proprietary.
`
`(c) Communication of this "bits and gains" information from each receiver to each
`transmitter. This paper recommends a procedure for this communication.
`
`2. Exchange of Bits and Gains Information
`
`As shown in Fig. 5 of 93-083, the RTU transmits the random channel-analysis signal
`immediately after the periodic line-conditioning signal. Thereafter, the basic sequence of signals is
`as shown in Fig. 1 of this paper. It should be noted that the channel analyses are performed
`simultaneously (i.e., in a full-duplex mode); this is because unfiltered or uncancelled echo may be a
`significant part of the total "noise" seen by a receiver. The subsequent exchange of bits and gains,
`however, is most conveniently performed in a half-duplex mode.
`
`Ultra reliability in the exchange of bits and gains information is very desirable, but at this
`stage of the initialization the two transmitters do not, of course, know how many bits each of their
`subcarriers can carry. Since, however, the amount of information to be sent is quite small Gust 16
`bits for each of the Ne carriers), a set of only four low-frequency carriers (those that would be
`expected eventually to carry up to eleven bits) is used with only QPSK on each. Two other
`safeguards are used: the information is repeated on a second set of fourcarriers, and a l6-bit CRC is
`appended to the data.
`
`The bits and gains signal, which therefore consists of 2Ne symbols, is preceded by a
`header symbol and followed by the CRC (both formats to be recommended later) for a total of
`(2Ne +4) symbols.
`
`The format of the symbols is [bi,gi] = [bli,b2i,b3i,b4i,gli,g2i, ........... g12i], and they are
`transmitted in ascending order of subcarrier number: that is, ; = 1 to Ne*.
`
`* The N is enclosed in quotation marks to emphasize that the "noise" is the sum total of all
`impairments listed in Section 4.1 of TIE 1.4/92-098.
`
`

`
`The bl,b2,b3,b4 are encoded in conventional binary (0000 to 1011 for 0 to 11) onto a
`primary set of carriers 8-9 and a secondary set that is to be determined.
`
`The gl, ....... gI2 represent the ratio of the gain to be transmitted to that used for channel
`analysis, with 0010 0000 0000 being normalized to unity. For example 0100 0000 0000 would
`indicate a 6 dB increase in power.
`
`The symbols [hi,gil are transmitted on the primary set of carriers 8 - 11 and a secondary set
`Nsec - Nsec+3 in conventional QPSK as follows:
`
`blb2 b3b4 g1g2 g3g4
`11
`8
`9
`10
`First symbol:
`First symbol: Nsec+ 0
`1
`2
`3
`
`g5g6 g7g8 g9g10 g11g12
`8
`9
`10
`11
`Second symbol:
`Second symbol: Nsec+ 0
`1
`2
`3
`
`This method of communicating the bits and gains information is extremely reliable, but there
`is, of course, a non-zero probability of error. If the CRC indicates an error then the "basic"
`procedure of Fig. 1 must be refmed to allow for retransmission. Details of this have not been
`fmalized. In the the present implementation a detected error would initiate a complete re(cid:173)
`initialization: this is not necessary.
`
`References.
`
`[1] J.A.C. Bingham, "The Theory and Practice of Modem Design", John Wiley and Sons, 1988.
`
`[2] D. Hughes-Hartogs, "Ensemble Modem Structure for Imperfect Transmission Media", U.S.
`Patent No. 4.679.227, July 1987.
`
`co
`
`Medley
`
`RT
`
`Medley
`
`S = Segue; H = Header (see 93-083)
`
`Figu re 1. Bits and Powers exchange.
`
`* Subcarrier 0 can never be used in a transformer-coupled system. Subcarrier Nc is at the Nyquist
`frequency,fsl2; if used, which would be very rarely, it could be modulated only as BPSK: that is
`bNc may be 0 to 5.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket