throbber
IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 9. NO. 6. AUGUST 1991
`
`765
`
`High Bit Rate Digital Subscriber Line: A Copper
`Bridge to the Network of the Future
`
`Wil Walkoe and Thomas J. J. Stan, Member, IEEE
`
`Abstract-The high-bit-rate digital subscriber line (HDSL),
`permitting low-cost 1.5 Mb/s copper access, will ease the tran-
`sition to fiber access by accelerating the use of higher speed
`services. Copper will dominate over fiber customer access for
`at least the next ten years. During this period, the success of
`high-speed switched services will depend on the connectivity
`provided by both fiber and copper access. HDSL will initially
`be used to serve private-line DS1, ISDN primary rate access,
`and digital loop carrier feeders. Later, the HDSL will be ap-
`plied to switched services such as metropolitan area networks
`(MAN’S) and circuit switched DSl’s.
`
`I. INTRODUCTION
`
`F switching centers, is now widely endorsed as the
`
`IBER optics, long popular for transmission between
`
`transmission technology of choice between the switching
`center and the customer site. The fiber optic technology
`being developed now will be the most economical means
`to build new access facilities to customers using plain old
`telephone service (POTS). More importantly, fiber optics
`are essential for the success of broadband telecommuni-
`cations services. Telephone companies are rapidly de-
`ploying fiber optic cables in the access plant today. But,
`the enormity of the existing local access network will
`make the fiber optic facilities a minority of the local ac-
`cess for many years. The powerful economic pressures
`for reducing transmission costs and providing broadband
`services raise serious concems about the next twenty years
`required to fully deploy fiber. We suggest that while max-
`imum use is made of the fiber as it is deployed, we must
`also make the best use of the existing $100 billion copper
`cable plant in the U.S. The high-bit-rate digital subscriber
`line (HDSL), permitting low-cost 1.5 Mb/s copper ac-
`cess, will ease the transition to fiber access by accelerat-
`ing the use of higher speed services.
`
`11. AN ILLUSTRATION: PHOTOWN
`
`The upscale suburban community of Photown typifies
`the communications revolution of the mid-to-late 1990’s.
`The same fiber-to-the-curb network that provides POTS
`to Photown’s homes and businesses carries a powerful set
`of advanced services at a modest incremental cost. The
`smallest business sites have access to switched computer
`communications at throughput rates that were once pos-
`sible on only the largest private networks. Medical clinics
`access multimegabit x-ray and CT images from remote
`hospital record centers in a matter of seconds, and a va-
`riety of other bitmapped and coded image formats are rev-
`olutionizing applications ranging from computer-inte-
`grated manufacturing to the preparation of advertising
`copy. Even routine business paperwork is being auto-
`mated with computer-aided workflow systems based on
`scanned business documents.
`Local hotels have equipped many of their meeting
`rooms to support the growing demand for video confer-
`encing, and medium to large business sites typically have
`video facilities of their own. Many video services for
`home and business customers require full video transmis-
`sion only “downstream,” to the user, with simpler inter-
`actions using voice and low-speed data and control sig-
`nals providing all of the needed
`interaction
`in the
`“upstream” direction. These applications, including
`training and education services, library access to multi-
`media materials, and a growing number of public ser-
`vices, are deployed even more widely than videoconfer-
`ence facilities, penetrating individual offices and many
`residences. A growing body of material is being devel-
`oped for these applications on optical storage media, ac-
`cessible over the network at disk-transfer speeds.
`Photown is growing rapidly, as the needs of a growing
`service economy create strong demand for a modem com-
`munications infrastructure. Despite the virtually unpre-
`dictable growth pattern created by the work-at-home phe-
`nomenon, the Photown Telephone Company has little
`difficulty adjusting to new service demand wherever it
`springs up. Any line can be upgraded to advanced service
`
`Manuscript received October 19, 1990; revised May 1, 1991.
`The authors are with Ameritech Services, Rolling Meadows, IL 60008
`IEEE Log Number 9101626.
`
`0733-8716/91/0800-0765$01.00 0 1991 IEEE
`
`

`
`7 66
`
`IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 9. NO. 6. AUGUST 1991
`
`capability with the addition of the right terminal equip-
`ment at the subscriber’s site and a high-speed connection
`at the local exchange office.
`
`111. WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
`For an imaginary location, Photown has had a lot of
`visitors. Minor variations on the scenes described above
`appear regularly in network-of-the-future articles in the
`communications trade press, timestamped anywhere from
`the mid-1990’s to the turn of the century.
`Forecasts of this sort are based-in part-on valid tech-
`nical information. In volume production, known designs
`for fiber-to-the curb telephone systems could be cheaper
`than traditional copper telephone loops for most new con-
`struction in the 1993-1995 timeframe. These systems
`could deliver all of Photown’s advanced services at rea-
`sonable cost, as well as providing an excellent platform
`for the evolution of even more powerful applications in
`the early 21st Century. The only problem is that there
`might not be anybody to talk to at the other end of the
`high-speed call.
`Fiber optics will replace copper in the local telephone
`loop, but not all at once. The construction budget of a
`local exchange carrier (LEC) can support only a modest
`deployment of new cable plant each year. A typical LEC,
`devoting 100% of its new-construction budget to install-
`ing fiber, would take about twenty years to reach 50% of
`its customers with fiber-optic local service. Even if all
`rehabilitation projects were added to the fiber deploy-
`ment, it would still take nearly twelve years to reach 50%
`fiber penetration. New service opportunities could accel-
`erate this process, but there would still be a long delay
`between the first fiber deployment and widespread avail-
`ability of high-speed services. Fig. 1 illustrates the length
`of time it will take to replace copper transmission with
`fiber optic systems. Though fiber optic cable can be eco-
`nomically proved-in for POTS alone, the most exciting
`potential lies in the provision of higher speed services.
`The success of these services depends on connectivity
`within a large community of interest.
`The first fiber optic communities-the Photowns of the
`world-will be islands of high-speed services. Photown
`residents could easily be equipped for wideband commu-
`nication of computer data, digital images, and interactive
`video to one another, but calling would initially be con-
`fined to a small number of sophisticated customers. The
`resulting market for wideband information services could
`hinder the attraction of service providers. Photown will
`have high-quality telephone service and a cost-effective
`implementation of narrowband enhancements such as
`ISDN, but wideband “network of the future” services will
`have to wait for the rest of the world to come on line’.
`
`80%
`
`-
`70% -
`60% -
`50% -
`40% -
`30% -
`20% -
`10% -
`
`1980
`
`1985
`
`1990
`
`199s
`
`2000
`
`ZOOS
`
`2010
`
`2015
`
`2020
`
`2025
`
`Fig. I . Conceptual model of fiber deployment
`
`IV. THE MISSING LINK
`What would it take to bring wideband services to the
`world at large? The ideal solution would be a low-cost
`transmission system that could instantly convert any ex-
`isting local telephone connection to a wideband channel.
`No changes would be needed in the outside plant; the line
`termination equipment would simply be upgraded at both
`ends of the loop, with relatively simple electronics. If this
`could be accomplished with a line termination of about
`two to three times the complexity of a basic-rate ISDN
`NT 1, advanced services could be affordably deployed
`wherever a significant business opportunity exists-inde-
`pendent of geography.
`The service would not need to operate at SONET
`the services described in the
`broadband speeds. All of
`Photown fable could be implemented over digital lines ut
`the DSl datu rute of 1.544 Mb/s. However, the current
`T1 carrier technology for delivering DS1 service would
`not meet the needs of a new mass communication service
`because of its high cost, special requirements on the sub-
`scriber’s inside wiring, and long, complicated network
`provisioning process. For low-cost and timely provision
`of service, there is a need for existing telephone lines to
`transport DS 1 data rates without regard to repeater place-
`ment, cable-pair placement in a particular cable binder
`group, or its configuration of bridged tap wiring.
`We are closer to that solution than is commonly be-
`lieved. In November 1989, Ameritech conducted experi-
`ments together with Bellcore and one of our major equip-
`ment suppliers, in which prototypes of a new transmission
`technology known as HDSL (high-bit-rate digital sub-
`scriber line) successfully carried DS 1 signals over carrier-
`serving area distances on existing Illinois Bell telephone
`loops. The loops were not conditioned in any way, and
`they included some transmission challenges, such as
`bridged taps, that have caused problems with other so-
`
`‘It would be an exaggeration to say that there would be rio application
`of wideband communications, but the applications would be limited to spe-
`
`cial services within a narrow community of interest until fiber deployment
`reaches a critical mass. Based on Fig. 1, this process could take one to two
`decades.
`
`

`
`WALKOE AND STARR: HIGH BIT RATE DSL
`
`761
`
`phisticated signal formats. The HDSL system provided
`excellent transmission over these facilities, and an appli-
`cation demonstration delivered a high-quality videocon-
`ference signal over a distance of 12 000 feet to the serving
`exchange office.
`HDSL is an outgrowth of transmission techniques that
`were developed for ISDN basic rate access and high-speed
`digital modems. While several different detailed imple-
`mentations of HDSL are currently under consideration2,
`they all share the following basic characteristics.
`Transmission over existing distribution wire pairs.
`Full-duplex, DS 1 -framed transport at 1.544 Mb /s.
`Specified bit error rate ten times better than T1 car-
`
`rier.
`
`Repeaterless operation for full camer serving area
`(CSA)3.
`Operation in the presence of bridged taps and gauge
`changes.
`Spectral compatibility to permit coexistence in the
`same cable-sheath with voice, basic rate ISDN, T1 car-
`rier, and many other transmission systems.
`Today, HDSL is still a laboratory system, but it could be
`put into full-scale deployment in about two years. Some
`hard work remains to be done in the negotiation of trans-
`mission specifications and the development of operations
`plans for full-scale deployment. Yet, the feasibility of
`HDSL is well established.
`Upgrading a copper phone line to HDSL will not be
`quite as inexpensive as providing DS1 service via fiber to
`people in Photown, but the cost and provisioning of HDSL
`will make it attractive for most of the services described
`in the fable. And since most potential customers will be
`within reach of HDSL on the day it is introduced, mass-
`market wideband services will not have to wait for large-
`scale fiber deployment.
`HDSL deployment can lead to the emergence of wide-
`band service demand, because the technology can be
`proven-in with benefits to current services: private-line
`DS 1, ISDN primary rate access, and digital loop carrier
`feeders.
`
`V. WHAT ABOUT SWITCHING?
`HDSL can connect a mass market to the nearest tele-
`phone exchange at wideband data rates, but where will
`the signals go from there? Most of the services described
`in the opening fable will require wideband switched con-
`nections, not just cheaper DS1 private lines.
`Fortunately, a complementary technology is likely to
`become available in the same mid-1990’s timeframe as
`
`’TIE1 proposals for HDSL implementation include: one-pair QAM
`transmission with trellis coding (AT&T), two-pair 2B1Q (separate propos-
`als by Bellcore and BNR), two-pair multitone transmission (J. Cioffi,
`Telebit), and combined coding-precoding (MotorolaiCodex).
`’The CSA permits loop lengths up to 12 Kft of 24 AWG cable, or 9 Kft
`of 26 AWG cable.
`
`HDSL. Metropolitan area network (MAN) systems, ini-
`tially developed to provide a limited number of connec-
`tions at DS3 and higher speeds for major sites in down-
`town areas, have proven to be even more effective as DS1
`data switches for a larger subscriber base. MAN’S provide
`an excellent switching platform for DS1 data communi-
`cations, digital image transmission, and real-time inter-
`active video. The main limitation that has been antici-
`pated for these services is the small number of subscribers
`with DS1 access to the exchange-and with HDSL, that
`number can grow rapidly.
`A second wideband switching technology is also near
`readiness: circuit switching of DSl’s and fractions of
`D S l ’ s that function much like and ISDN B-channel call,
`but at a 1.544 Mb rate.
`The residents of Photown may not be so isolated after
`all.
`
`VI. BACK TO THE FUTURE
`
`A natural question to ask at this point is whether there
`is any remaining need to build Photown in the first place.
`If HDSL can deliver wideband service on proven copper
`transmission media, and MAN’s and DS1 circuit switch-
`ing systems can switch that service efficiently, is there
`any reason for telephone companies to work their way
`through the learning curve for optical transmission and
`more advanced switched services such as broadband
`ISDN?
`HDSL provides a good vehicle for the widespread de-
`ployment of DS1 services, but it is pressing the limits of
`transmission over twisted-pair wire. Fiber optic transmis-
`sion, once installed in an area, will always offer a cheaper
`upgrade to DS1 service, and its ability to carry signals
`hundreds of times faster than DSl makes it a better long-
`term investment. As fiber loop technology reaches cost
`parity with copper for POTS, it would be a mistake not
`to use it in new construction and major repair. As the de-
`mand for advanced DS1 services develops, the economics
`will tilt more strongly in favor of fiber, eventually justi-
`fying early replacement of copper with fiber in areas that
`would not otherwise qualify for traditional loop rehabili-
`tation.
`HDSL does not make Photown obsolete; it makes Pho-
`town practical. The development of a large-scale market
`for switched DS1 services will similarly accelerate the de-
`ployment of 150-600 Mb/s broadband ISDN switches.
`The first use of 150 Mb switching will probably be for
`tandem switching of multiple DS 1 channels concentrated
`by MAN’s. Once deployed, these switches may also pro-
`vide broadband ISDN services for leading-edge subscri-
`bers.
`The network of the 21st Century will have a number of
`the characteristics that we have seen in the popular fore-
`casts of the last several years. Broadband ISDN services,
`
`

`
`768
`
`
`
`IEEE JOURNAL ( I N SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS. VOL. 9. NO. 6, AUGUST 1991
`
`delivered via fiber-optic local loops, will integrate a broad
`range of voice, data, image, and video services to the
`business and (eventually) residence markets. Universal
`broadband communications will provide the basis for a
`rich market in information and entertainment services.
`Copper loops with HDSL technology are a necessary
`evolutionary step towards a broadband fiber network.
`Wideband copper transmission is not the ultimate network
`of the future. It is the bridge that will get us there.
`
`Wil Walkoe received the B A degree from Kal-
`amazoo College, Kalamazoo, MI, in 1963, and
`the M S. degree in industrial engineering and
`Ph.D degree in mathematics from the University
`of Wisconsin in 1969 and 1981, respectively
`He is a Senior Member of Technical Staff in
`Systems Engineering, Ameritech Services, Roll-
`ing Meadows, 1L. Prior to joining Ameritech in
`1988, he taught for eleven years at Grand Valley
`University, Allendale, MI, and worked in AT&T'5
`Data Systems Division for seven years in systems
`engineering and product management
`
`Thomas J. J. Starr (S'74-M'74-M'83)
`received
`the B.S. degree in computer engineering, and the
`M.S. degree in computer science from the Uni-
`versity of Illinois, Champaign.
`He was a Member of Technical Staff at AT&T
`Bell Labs in Naperville, IL for 12 years, where he
`worked on IAESS circuit design, memory updat-
`ing systems, SESS ISDN circuit design, system
`architecture, and ISDN standards (ISDN basic
`rate, layer I ) . He joined Americh Services, Inc.
`in May 1988, and is now a Senior Member of
`Technical Staff in the newly formed Advanced Network Technologies or-
`ganization. Shortly after joining ASI. he was elected Chairperson of the
`United States Exchange Carriers Standards Association Standards Working
`Group T l E l . 4 , which is responsible for layer-I network interface stan-
`dards for ISDN basic rate (the U-interface (2BlQ) and SIT interfaces).
`This group also has a project to study high-bit-rate digital subscriber line
`(HDSL) technology which will permit nonrepeatered 1 .S Mb/s service over
`existing nonconditioned CSA wire loops. He leads a project team within
`Ameritech to study this technology. He is also investigating next-genera-
`tion switching architectures, which include refinement of ISDN and plan-
`ning towards 1.5 M b / s (and N X 64 kb/s) switching. He participates as
`a U.S. delegate to the CCITT SG-XVIII International Standards body to
`help carry the U.S. standards positions into the intemational standards
`bodies. He holds five U.S. patents.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket