throbber
United States Patent [191
`Kardos et a1.
`
`[54] COOLANT COMPOSITION CONTAINING
`POTASSIUM FORMATE AND POTASSIUM
`ACETATE AND METHOD OF USE
`
`[75] Inventory Péti' X31105; 1TH)" .lfélmén; Jélsef
`Kern; Eszter N Kern, all of
`Buda est, Hun r
`p
`ga y
`,
`.
`
`_
`
`__
`
`_
`
`,
`
`[73] Asslgnee‘ Es?ikfnag’amrszagl Vegylmuveki
`SaJobabony, Hungary
`
`[21] Appl. No.: 563,782
`
`[22] Filed
`'
`
`A“ 3 1990
`g‘ ’
`
`.
`.
`I Related U's' Apphcanon Data
`commuano?-in-pm 0f Seri NO- 266,833,_N0v- 3, 1988,
`abandoned~
`
`[63]
`
`[51] Int. Cl.5 .............................................. .. C09K~5/00
`[52] US. Cl. ...................................... .. 252/79; 252/75;
`252/76; 252/77
`[58] Field of Search ...................... .. 252/ 76, 79, 75, 77
`
`IlllllllllllllllllllllIlllllllllllllllllllIllllIllllIllllllllllllllilllllll
`USOO5104562A
`[11]
`5,104,562
`Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`Apr. 14, 1992
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`
`U'S' PATENT DOCUMENTS
`2,233,185 2/1941 Smith .................................. .. 252/76
`4,219,433 8/1980 M b t
`l.
`252 76
`4,332,209 7/l982 M22215: :t :1.
`252275
`4,587,028 5/1986 Darden ............................... .. 252/75
`_
`Primary Examiner-Paul Lieberman
`Assistant Examiner-Christine A. Skane
`
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Schweitzer Cornman &
`Gross
`
`ABSHMCT -
`[57]
`A frost resistant glycol-free coolant composition or
`process for cooling apparatus is used for cooling, with
`such composition, which comprises an aqueous solution
`of a water soluble alkali metal salt, or a mixture of two
`alkali metal salts. Particularly suitable alkali metal salts
`- are alkali metal acetate and alkali metal formate. De
`pending on the nature of the particular alkali metal salt
`or salts, and the extent of frostproofness that is required,
`the compositon can further contain urea and/or a gly
`col antifreeze, such as ethylene glycol. Optionally a
`corrosion inhibitor can also be used.
`_
`14 Claims, No Drawings
`
`PAGE 1 of 5
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT 1128
`
`

`
`COOLANT COMPOSITION CONTAINING
`POTASSIUM FORMATE AND POTASSIUM
`ACETATE AND METHOD OF USE
`
`5
`
`1
`
`This is a continuing application of US. Ser. No.
`266,883, ?led on Nov. 3, 1989, now abandoned.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`The present invention relates to a cooling ?uid for
`internal combustion engines, more particularly to a
`glycol free cooling ?uid having increased frost resis
`tance. The cooling ?uid of the present invention is envi
`ronmentally safe, therefore its use is preferred not only
`for the cooling of internal combustion engines, but also
`for operating cooling towers of thermal power stations,
`industrial and household refrigerators and freezers,
`open and closed heat exchangers, solar collectors, dou
`blers and autoclaves used in the chemical industry, and
`generally providing equipment with protection against
`frost damage in case of freezing.
`'
`‘
`
`5,104,562
`2
`frost resistance, however, the low speci?c heat, high
`volatility, i.e. low boiling point as well as the risk of ?re
`and explosion all counsel against their use; all the more
`so, because certain members of this group of organic
`compounds, such as methanol are also poisonous, toxic
`and are therefore, unsafe to use in an industrial environ
`ment.
`Due to their various advantages, the aqueous ethyl
`ene glycol solutions marketed as heat transfer liquids
`under various trade names have been accepted in a wide
`range as frost resistant coolants. The advantage of these
`solutions is that glycol can be mixed with water without
`limitations, ?re and explosion risk is moderate, the spe
`ci?c heat is about twice as high as that of the aforemen
`tioned organic solvents, they are colorless, odorless and
`relatively frost resistant. Speci?c heat and solidi?cation
`point are functions of the glycol-water ratio. With the
`increase of water content the speci?c heat increases, but
`frost resistance decreases. The lowest solidi?cation
`point (-57“ C.) is associated with the eutectic composi
`tion. In this case the glycol content is 60% by volume.
`A further advantage is that in the practically important
`,compositions the glycol-water mixture does not freeze
`with a concomitant increase in volume. Consequently
`apparatus cooled with a glycol-water coolant will not
`be freezing.
`There are also disadvantages which limit the wider
`use of glycol based coolants. Ethylene glycol is very
`toxic and it can be easily confused with ethyl alcohol.
`The ingestion of ethylene glycol has led repeatedly to
`well publicized, occasionally fatal poisoning cases. Eth
`ylene glycol can also contaminate the environment, and
`grave consequences as a result if it gets into bodies of
`water, such as when the coolant is carelessly discarded,
`or when it leaks from defective equipment. The frost
`resistance of ethylene glycol can be only partially uti
`lized because for example an aqueous mixture of 1:1
`volume ratio has a freezing point of —38° C., but at
`—3l° C. it already shows a jelly-like nonthixotropic
`consistence, and is thus unsuitable for pumping. The so
`called ?uidity limit of —3l° C. cannot be further re
`duced even by modifying the glycol: water ratio, and
`this also means that below —30“ C. in complications,
`such as heat transfer processes were low viscosity is
`required the glycol-water mixture cannot be employed.
`' The frost resistance and ?uidity decrease, and the cor
`rosiveness of aqueous ethylene glycol increases in time,
`due to slow polymerization and acidic decomposition of
`the glycol. Therefore, the mixture has to be replaced
`from time to time, and this increases operating expenses.
`
`25
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`The most generally used cooling ?uid is water in the
`temperature range above the freezing point. In addition
`to its ready availability, the advantage of water is that
`all liquids it has the highest speci?c heat. it has low
`viscosity and, as a result of its physical properties it has
`good heat conductivity. In addition to these important
`thermal characteristics, it has a relatively moderate
`corrosive effect, which can be further reduced by the
`addition of inhibitors.
`However, the disadvantage of water is that it is not
`frost-resistant. Upon freezing its volume increases by
`9%, leading to the frost damage of equipment.
`As used throughout the speci?cation and the claims,
`characterizing terms such as “frost free” or “resistant to
`freezing” means that a material so characterized does
`not freeze at least substantially below the freezing point
`of water. Also as used throughout the speci?cation and
`claims, terms such as “coolant” and “cooling ?uid" are
`used interchangeably with the same meaning.
`The frost resistance of water can be signi?cantly
`improved by the addition of electrolytes that stay dis
`solved even at low temperatures. This possibility is,
`however, very much limited by the fact that the use of
`acids and bases is not permissible in many places for
`industrial safety, environmental protection and due to
`their corrosive nature. From a cryoscopic aspect cal
`cium chloride has been proved to be most advanta
`geous, because by its addition a temperature of even
`about 50° C. can be attained, while the solution main
`tains its liquid state, and only a slight increase in viscos
`ity and a slight reduction in speci?c heat takes place. A
`much more serious problem, however, is the corrosion
`activating effect of the chloride ions, mainly in concen
`trated solutions. This effect which causes mostly a per
`foration corrosion, cannot be satisfactorily reduced
`even by the use of any known corrosion inhibitors.
`Solubility problems arise if other anions are used instead
`of chloride. When e.g. calcium sulfate is used, these
`problems can involve a low saturation concentration
`under all conditions, or when, for example, sodium
`sulfate or potassium nitrate is used, a dramatic decrease
`of saturation concentration will occur with decreasing
`temperature.
`Hydrocarbons, alcohols, and ketones- of a low carbon
`atom number are very advantageous with respect to
`
`35
`
`DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
`The invention is aimed at maintaining the advantages
`of glycol based aqueous coolants, and eliminating their
`disadvantages, and ensuring an optional arbitrary mix
`ing ratio of the new coolant with conventional glycol
`based coolant media. Consequently with conventional
`ethylene glycol coolant was imposed as a requirement,
`because we had to consider the possibility of mixing the
`occurrence of mistaken or mixing due to stock manage
`ment requirements.
`We'have found that in an aqueous medium alkali
`metal salts of certain anions, suitably acetates and for
`mates in combination with each other optionally with
`additional water soluble organic compounds, such as
`formamide and/or urea containing an intensively hy
`drophilic substituent with or without an added glycol,
`result in such an extreme reduction in freezing point,
`
`65
`
`PAGE 2 of 5
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT 1128
`
`

`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`5,104,562
`4
`3
`to be compensated by organic compounds containing
`which is not even approached when the individual com
`the optional hydrophilic substituents and/or by ethyl
`ponents, are separately dissolved in water.
`In fact, the resultant freezing point decrease, calcu
`ene glycol.
`lated on the basis of additivity in freezing point reduc
`In this case the advantage of not using glycol at all is
`tions as determined separately for each component, lags
`lost, and only the advance of reduced glycol content
`far behind the freezing point reduction actually
`can be realized. This means that in the case of the fol
`lowing Example I, 80% less glycol is necessary for
`achieved by the mixture of the above mentioned com
`ponents. This very signi?cant extra effect is convinc
`achieving an identical drop in freezing point calculated
`ingly proven for example, with potassium acetate and
`for the same volume of the liquid, than for the conven
`tional, purely glycol-based compositions.
`potassium formate. In a concentrated aqueous solution
`of potassium acetate the achievable freezing point that
`According to none embodiment of the invention this
`is -38° C. (—36.4° F.) and in the case of potassium
`80% glycol portion can now be replaced with environ
`formate the solution freezes at ~35” C. (—3l° F.). This
`mentally friendly materials. If, however, the acetate
`means that compared to the freezing point of water, the
`salt-formate salt mixture is a salt each of the potassium
`decrease of the freezing point is the same. On the other
`cation, the glycol can be fully eliminated. If desired, it
`hand if these two potassium compounds are “dissolved”
`can be replaced with compounds which are harmless to
`in water in combination with each other, employing the
`the environment and would not be hazardous to health.
`compositions to be described later, a composition is
`Frost resistance and ?uidity are also increased in com
`obtained that is liquid at 70“ C., or even at lower tem
`parison to the glycol-based cooling ?uid of identical
`peratures. Nevertheless, such an extreme frost resis
`water content, as shown by the following Example 2.
`tance is very rarely required in practice. Therefore, and
`Those potassium acetate, potassium formate combi
`also for more economical operation it is advisable to
`nations are particularly advantageous for decreasing the .
`dilute the liquid with water to the extent that the result
`‘ freezing point, wherein the mass ratio of the two anions
`ing solution should, remain frost resistant under the
`is adjusted that the quantity (mass) of acetate in the ?uid
`given climatic conditions with full safety. This ap
`should be suitably approximately six times of that of the
`proach is also justi?ed by the fact that in all cases the
`formate. By increasing the relative concentration of the
`speci?c heat and ?uidity of the liquid increase on dilu
`more expensive and due to corrosive characteristics
`tion.
`also more disadvantageous formate ions, the freezing
`In connection with the liquids of the present inven
`point depression already achieved cannot be practically
`tion, including the aforementioned acetate and formate
`improved, but if a more moderate frost resistance is also
`mixtures, the use of expressions such as “dissolving”
`sufficient in a geographic area of speci?ed climate, then
`and "solution” may not necessarily be theoretically
`the concentration of the formate additive can be arbi
`accurate, because the structures of the liquids are more
`trarily reduced, sometimes even entirely omitted.
`similar to molten matter than to aqueous solutions.
`On the other hand, it should be taken into consider
`Therefore, such materials which cannot be truly char
`ation that in the cooling systems of internal combustion
`acterized as an aqueous “solution” are also referred to
`engines, the liquid can bring about simultaneous corro
`herein as an aqueous “preparation”.
`sion of various structural materials in metallic contact
`Since the added compounds appear completely to
`with each other. This is the possibility of coupled metal
`destroy the original liquid structure of water, the physi
`corrosion, also called contact corrosion, which can
`cal-chemical laws which otherwise determine the freez
`multiply the severity of corrosion. Therefore, the pro
`ing point of an aqueous solution. For example, the law
`tection of the cooling system could be further insured
`of molecular freezing point depression, is no longer
`by the addition of corrosion inhibitors. Although devel
`even approximately valid. Principally, those non-water
`opment of a new inhibitor composition was not the
`components become overwhelming, the molar freezing
`subject of this invention, some corrosion inhibitors
`point depressions of which exceed that of water. On the
`known for other uses are listed below, which, as we
`other hand, the competitive hydrolysis of alkalimetal
`found, provide appropriate protection._
`salts, such as of formate and acetateions prevents the
`It is an object of this invention to provide a frost
`development of a long-range order characteristic for a
`resistant aqueous coolant composition containing alkali
`solid crystalline phase. This can occur to such an extent
`metal, suitably potassium acetate and potassium formate
`that it leads to extremely low freezing points signi?
`50
`as main components, signi?cantly shifting the acetate
`cantly deviating from those expected on the basis of
`formate ratio to the advantage of acetate, or optionally,
`additivity and interpolation calculations. This is demon
`in the case of a moderate frost resistance requirement,
`strated by numerical data.
`entirely omitting the formate additive, while in the case
`Our other recognition was that the speci?c charge of
`where a higher frost resistance demanded the formate
`alkali metal cations plays a signi?cant role in depressing
`55
`concentration can reach 25% of the acetate concentra
`freezing point. For example, if sodium cation is used
`tion. In the case of extremely high frost resistance re
`instead of potassium in the acetate-formate salt combi
`nation, the low freezing point provided by potassium
`quirement, the water content in the mixture can be
`reduced to 30% by mass in the mixture, while in the
`. cationcannot even be approached. Without intending
`'case of a more moderate frost resistance requirement,
`to be bound, we believe that the reason for this is that
`the water content can be increased such as by the dilu-a
`the sodium cation vhas a higher speci?c charge, i.e.
`tion of concentrate.
`lower mass,v establishes a greater ?eld strength in its
`It can be mentioned as guidance that in the case of a
`own environment, thus the water dipoles are oriented
`1:6 formate-acetate anion concentration ratio which is
`more effectively, resulting in a more’ limited heat mo
`generally considered to be optimum, by increasing the
`tion. All this leads to a smaller decrease of freezing
`water content to 65%, the freezing point is —25° C. and
`point, even‘at identical molar concentrations. There
`fore, if the composition is intended to be established
`with the above mentioned 30% by mass water- content
`the freezing point is below —80° C.
`with sodium cations, their freezing point raising effect is
`
`60
`
`40
`
`45
`
`65
`
`PAGE 3 of 5
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT 1128
`
`

`
`5,104,562
`6
`C., viscosity at 22° C.; 2.3 cSt., density at 20° C.: 1.19
`g/cm3, speci?c heat in the 20° to 25° C. range: 3.27
`J/"C.cm3 or 2.75 J/°C.g. The liquid freezes without
`expansion.
`
`EXAMPLE 3
`Frost Resistant Liquid Mixtures Having Differing
`Glycol Content
`Conventional glycol-based and the glycol-free frost
`resistant liquids are mixed and are used in such combi
`nation. It was experimentally determined that the two
`liquids can be mixed in any desired ratio, and the prop
`erties of the liquids produced in this way were also
`determined as a function of mixing proportion.
`It was determined as a function of mixing proportion.
`It was determined that the characteristics change
`monotonously although not linearly with the composi
`tion. These conditions are re?ected by the freezing
`point data of the various mixtures of glycol-based cool
`ing liquid with the trade name “Prevent” (in which the
`glycol content is nearly 50% by volume) and the liquid
`speci?ed in Example 2, according to the following ta
`ble.
`Fluid according to
`
`25
`
`Example 2
`' % by volume
`
`Prevent
`% by volume
`
`Freezing point
`°C.
`
`100
`75
`50
`25
`0
`
`O
`25
`50
`75
`100
`
`5
`It is difficult to determine and specify a classically
`understood freezing point in solution according to the
`present invention, because the liquid is rather viscous in
`this concentration range, and it changes gradually to a
`state resembling a glass-type consistency. Therefore, no
`well de?ned freezing point can be determined experi
`mentally at that concentration. Thus as used herein,
`“freezing point” refers rather to the temperature at
`which with decreasing temperature ice crystals will
`?rst start to appear, and “solidi?cation point” refers to
`the point where the liquid phase disappears.
`A further object of this invention is to provide a
`composition which is suitable for use at more moderate
`frost resistance requirements, wherein sodium cations
`are used instead of potassium cations, In this case the
`use of other freezing point depressing components is
`such as of urea, also becomes necessary. In this embodi
`ment of the invention ethylene glycol may also be used.
`By the use of this liquid the disadvantages of using
`glycol are only partly eliminated. A frost resistance of
`about —30° C. can be achieved with the liquid if the
`concentrations of the acetate and formate anions are
`nearly the same and the mass concentration of urea and
`optionally of glycol approach of reach that of the for
`mate and acetate ions.
`A particularly advantageous coolant composition in
`accordance with the present invention comprises from
`about 3 to about 9 parts by weight water, from about 1
`to about 2 parts by weight potassium formate, from
`about 1 to about 9 parts by weight potassium acetate,
`from O to about 1.5 parts by weight urea, and from 0 to
`about 1.5 parts by weight of a glycol.
`Both coolant varieties can optionally be mixed in any
`ratio with a glycol based coolant, with the result that
`the well known disadvantages of glycol are proportion
`ate to the increasing glycol content of the mixture.
`Fluid compositions according to the invention can be
`produced in several varieties on the basis of the princi
`ples and data described above. Nevertheless, the follow
`ing illustrative examples set forth some speci?c compo
`sitions and properties of the coolant liquids of the pres
`ent invention.
`
`It can be seen that even if interpolation is not possible,
`the characteristics assume intermediate values which
`change monotonously with the ratio of the two compo
`nents. The viscosity values change in a similar manner.
`The viscosity of the liquid of Example 2 is lower at all
`temperatures than that of the glycol-based frost resis
`tant liquid and it can be pumped even at a temperature
`below — 30° C., i.e. it is fluid throughout above its freez
`ing point. It is also important that at any composition
`the liquid mixture freezes without expansion.
`Any variety of the liquid compositions according to
`the invention, such as of the Examples, can ‘also be
`produced from the formate and acetate salts as starting
`materials prepared separately by mixing the appropriate
`acid and base, or can be obtained from commercial
`sources. The process according to the examples is con
`sidered to be more advantageous because generally the
`acids and bases are available as the more easily accessi
`ble basic materials.
`Consequently, the advantages of coolants of the pres
`ent invention, as demonstrated quantitatively in the
`examples, is that the disadvantages resulting from the
`use of glycol in the conventional glycol water coolant
`can be partly eliminated in certain embodiments of the
`coolant compositions of the invention and fully in oth
`ers, without impairing the advantages of the conven
`tional coolants. In fact in employing the glycol-free
`embodiments of the invention, frost resistance and ?uid
`ity improve signi?cantly when compared with the con
`ventional coolants, and thereby the temperature range
`usefulness of the coolant is signi?cantly broadened.
`A further advantage was achieved by the glycol-free
`embodiments of the coolants of the present invention,
`
`EXAMPLE 1
`Frost Resistant Coolant with Reduced Glycol Content
`42.6 parts by weight of water, 14.9 parts by weight of
`sodium hydroxide, 10.6 parts by weight of urea, 11.0
`parts by weight of glycol, 10.9 parts by weight of 98%
`formic acid and 10.9 parts by weight of 99.5% acetic
`acid have been mixed, and to this mixture 5 g of Na
`50
`benzoate and l g of benzotriazole inhibitor has been
`added per liter of coolant. The characteristics of the
`resulting coolant are pH: 7.2, density at 20“ C.: 1.210
`g/cm3, boiling point: 111° C., viscosity at 20° C.: 5.9
`cSt, at 99° C.: 1.2 cSt, speci?c heat at 25° C.: 3.9 J/°C.
`cm3 or 3.2 J/°C.g. The solidi?cation point of the cool
`ant is at —35° C., with starting turbidity at —-28° C. The
`fluid freezes without expansion.
`EXAMPLE 2
`Glycol Free Environmentally Friendly Frost Resistant
`Coolant
`407 g of potassium hydroxide, 56.2 ml of 98% formic
`acid, 353.4 ml of 99.5% acetic acid and 807 ml of water
`have been mixed to form a premix, and the inhibitor
`additive described in Example 1 was added to the pre
`mix. The resulting liquid had the following characteris
`tics: pH 9.3, freezing point --45“ C., boiling point 110°
`
`65
`
`55
`
`PAGE 4 of 5
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT 1128
`
`

`
`7
`because the components that are employed cannot poly
`merize or be subjected to acidic decomposition. The
`coolants of the present invention can be need much
`larger than conventional coolants, increasing industrial
`safety, and decreasing costs.
`Comparative freezing point experiments were con
`ducted in which a saltwater molar ratio of 1:4.72 was
`employed throughout. The acetate and formate of po
`tassium were employed, as indicated. I
`
`Molar ratio within salt
`Acetate to Formats
`Freezing point ‘C.
`
`allznone
`nonezall
`6:1
`9:1
`1:2
`5:1
`
`-38
`—35
`-70
`—57
`—48
`—63
`
`20
`
`5,104,562
`8
`4. The coolant composition of claim 1, further com
`prising from about 0.1 to about 1.0 percent by mass of a
`corrosion inhibitor.
`'
`5. The coolant composition of claim 4, wherein said
`corrosion inhibitor is one or more of benzoic acid, so
`dium benzoate, potassium benzoate, and benzotriazole.
`6. Thecoolant composition of claim 1, comprising
`from about 4 to about 6 times as much of the potassium
`acetate than the potassium formate.
`7. The 'coolant composition of claim 6, which com
`prises at least about 30 percent by mass of water.
`8. A process for cooling apparatus in need of cooling
`with a liquid coolant, which comprises disposing within
`a space in the apparatus adapted to contain a liquid
`coolant, a coolant which is an aqueous solution of about
`1 to about 2 parts by weight of potassium formate, and
`potassium acetate.
`9. The process of claim 8, wherein the coolant further
`comprises a water soluble organic compound.
`10. The process of claim 9, wherein said water soluble
`organic compound is one or more of a formamide and
`urea that contains an intensivelyhydrophilic substitu
`
`‘ We claim:
`‘
`1. A coolant composition, comprising from about 3 to
`about 9 parts by weight water, from about 1 to about 2
`parts by weight of potassium formate, from about 1 to
`about 9 parts by weight of potassium acetate, from 0 to
`about 1.5 parts by weight urea, and from 0 to about 1.5
`parts by weight of a glycol.
`2. The coolant composition of claim 1, comprising at
`least about 0.5 parts by weight urea.
`3. The coolant composition of claim 1, comprising
`from about 4 to about 7 parts by weight potassium ace
`tate and from about 1 to about 1.5 parts by weight potas
`sium for'mate.
`
`. £111.
`
`11. The process of claim 10, the coolant further com
`prising a glycol coolant ingredient.
`12. The process of claim 11, wherein said glycol cool
`ant ingredient is ethylene glycol.
`13. The process of claim 8,‘ the and said coolant fur
`ther comprising a corrosion inhibitor.
`14. The process of claim 8, wherein the water content
`of the coolant is adjusted according to the frost resis~
`tance desired.
`
`* i i
`
`it
`
`i
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`PAGE 5 of 5
`
`PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT 1128

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket