throbber
GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
`EXHIBIT 1024
`IPR2015-to be assigned
`(Globus v. Bonutti)
`Page 1 of 6
`
`

`
`8
`
`VETERINARY SURGERY
`
`January-March 1979
`
`Vol. 8
`
`TABLE 1. Degree of Clinical Proprioceptive Gait
`Deficit (After Mayhew”)
`
`Grade
`
`Description
`
`0
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`Deficit not detected.
`Deficit detected at normal gait or posture but min-
`imal in degree.
`Deficit easily detected and exaggerated by back-
`ing and turning.
`Deficit very prominent at normal gait with a
`tendency to buckle or fall with backing and turn-
`mg.
`Stumbling, tripping, and falling spontaneously at
`normal gait.
`
`and the source of the graft material.” In essence, how-
`ever. the technique remains the same and anterior fu-
`sion is widely accepted as a means of stabilizing the
`human cervical spine. Satisfactory results have been
`reported in 80-90% of all cases.7»‘°"3
`This paper describes a ventral approach to the
`equine cervical spine and interbody vertebral fusion
`utilizing homologous bone from equine ilia.
`
`Materials and Methods
`
`Harvesting Bone Dowels
`
`Autogenous bone was difficult to obtain as dorsal position-
`ing of the horse for ventral cervical surgery made the ap-
`
`proach to the ilium awkward. Therefore, an equine cadaver
`bone bank was established to decrease operative time and to
`avoid the necessity of a second incision in the same patient.
`Bone dowels were obtained and stored in a manner similar to
`that described for human beings.2“3
`Bone dowels were harvested from cadavers of horses that
`had been destroyed for reasons other than systemic disease.
`The skin over the ilia of fresh cadavers was prepared by
`scrubbing with an iodine preparation* followed by alcohol
`rinse. The operative site was draped and an incision was
`made over the dorsal edge of the ilium. Muscle and perios-
`teum were removed from the wing of the ilium. An 18-mm
`dowel cutterl was used to remove 8-10 full-thickness dow-
`els from each ilium. The dowels varied in length from 30 to
`50 mm depending on the thickness of the ilia and consisted of
`largely canccllous bone with plates of cortical bone at each
`end. The bone dowels were soaked in a solution of 500 ml of
`sterile saline solution containing 1 g of Neomycin, 5,000,000
`U of Polymixin B and 5,000,000 U of Lincomycin for 30
`minutes. Dowels were then packaged separately in sterile
`plastic bags and frozen at -70°C until used. The bone grafts '
`were thawed for at least 1 hour prior to implantation.
`
`Preoperative Preparation
`
`Twelve horses ranging in age from 3 months to 2 years
`were selected for use in the investigation. All horses under-
`went complete physical and neurologic examinations. Prior
`to surgery, the proprioceptive gait deficits in each horse were
`evaluated on a scale from 0 to 4 (Table 1). Nine of the horses
`had been diagnosed as having cervical vertebral malforma-
`tion on the basis of clinical and radiographic findings. Three
`healthy horses were selected as controls.
`Twenty-four hours prior to surgery, a prophylactic treat-
`ment regimen of procaine penicillin G (30,000 U/kg) and di-
`hydrostreptornycin (7 g/day) was begun. The entire neck
`from the head to the shoulder was clipped and the ventral
`midline was shaved and washed with a dilute iodine prepara-
`tion.
`
`Operative Technique
`
`The patient was anesthetized and positioned in dorsal re-
`cumbency with the neck extended. The depth of the verte-
`bral body had been preoperatively estimated from a lateral
`radiograph. A radiographic cassette positioned lateral to the
`cervical area determined the level of the venebral fusion
`intraoperatively. After final preoperative preparation with
`iodine scrub and alcohol. the ventral aspect of the neck was
`covered with a large self-adherent plastic draped: The inci-
`sion site was surrounded with surgical drapes.
`A 30-cm skin incision was made on the ventral mid-line
`beginning 20 cm posterior to the wing of the atlas. The deep
`incision was continued between the bellies of the ster-
`nothyrohyoideus muscles, which were then retracted. The
`deep cervical fascia between the trachea and the carotid
`sheath was divided longitudinally using blunt dissection. The
`trachea was retracted to the left, and the right external jugu-
`lar vein, carotid artery, and vagus nerve were retracted to
`
`
`* Weladol Therapeutic Shampoo, Pittman-Moore,
`Washington Crossing, New Jersey 08560.
`T Zimmer. U.S.A., Warsaw, Indiana 46580.
`if Vi-Drape, Parke-Davis & Company, Detroit, Michigan 48232.
`
`Inc.,
`
`Page 2 of 6
`Page 2 of 6
`
`
`
`Ventral Crest
`
`Longus Colli Muscle
`
`Sternothyrohyoideus M.
`Bi Carotid Sheath
`
`Trachea
`
`Sternothyrohyoideus M.
`
`Fig. 1. The operative approach to the equine ventral spine.
`
`

`
`No.
`
`1
`
`EQUINE CERVICAL SPINE
`
`-
`
`Wagner, et al
`
`9 F
`
`the right (Fig. I), thus allowing palpation of the ventral crest
`through the longus colli muscles. A Steinman pin was placed
`in the ventral crest at the level to be fused, and a lateral
`radiograph served to confirm that the marker pin was at the
`correct space (Fig. 2).
`The longus colli muscles were retracted following separa-
`tion from the bone by a periosteal elevator. The ventral crest
`was exposed and removed with rongeurs to prepare a level
`bed for the drill guide.
`Special instruments for drilling the hole across the disc
`space included a Cloward twist drill (16 mm), a pronged
`guard, and 21 Hudson cranial drill brace§ (Fig. 3). The guard
`was centered over the intervertebral space and secured in
`the bone by gentle tapping with a mallet. An assistant braced
`the guard while the surgeon drilled out the bone and interver-
`tebral disc. The drill and guide were removed periodically to
`evacuate debris and evaluate positioning. Positioning was
`considered correct if the disc appeared near the center of the
`hole (Fig. 4). The equine disc space curves cranially. neces-
`sitating slight rcdirection of the drill as the hole was drilled.
`The white, fibrous disc material was easily identified. Debris
`was removed periodically with a sharp curette and pituitary
`rongeurs. At a depth of approximately 15 mm, the guard was
`removed and the drilling continued “freehand.” Estimation
`of proximity to the spinal canal was based on periodic meas-
`urement with a depth gauge during the drilling process. Care
`was taken to avoid perforation of the vertebral body cortex
`and the underlying dorsal ligament and spinal cord. Drilling
`was complete when only a thin wall of cortical bone re-
`mained between the drill and the dorsal ligament. This thin
`wall was removed with a spinal curette, and the hole was
`cleared of debris and flared at its dorsal edge.
`The thawed bone dowel was placed on a Cloward dowel
`impactor handle" (Fig. 5). smoothed with a bone rasp, and
`adjusted to fit the depth of the hole. The bone dowel was
`inserted into the site and tamped so that it was even with or
`just below the edge of the hole. The longus colli muscles and
`the bellies of the sternothyrohyoideus muscles were apposed
`using simple interrupted sutures. The subcutaneous tissue
`and skin incision were closed with interrupted mattress su-
`tures.
`
`the
`Following the animal’s recovery from anesthesia,
`wound was covered with a sterile towel and elastic tape to
`avoid contamination. Feed and water were elevated to dis-
`courage excessive flexion of the neck. Antibiotics were ad-
`ministered for 5 days postoperatively. Bandages and sutures
`were removed 14 days postoperatively. After 1 month of
`confinement to a stall, the horse was permitted access to a
`large paddock.
`
`Results
`
`Immediate Postoperative Results
`
`All 12 horses recovered uneventfully and were
`standing within 1 hour following extubation. Two ani-
`mals had to be assisted in arising; however, both had
`been severely ataxic preoperatively.
`Postoperative stiffness in the cervical area and vent-
`ral swelling were exhibited by all horses and persisted
`
`
`§ Codman and Shurtleff, Randolph, Massachusetts 02368.
`" Codman and Shurtleff, Randolph. Massachusetts 02368.
`
`ig. 2. Radiograph obtained after approximate cervical
`level was reached. Pins are inserted into the disc space to ascer-
`tain correctness of the approach.
`
`for 7 days. Anti-inflammatory or analgesic drugs were
`not administered. A cervical neck brace was designed
`for the first horse; however.
`this was discarded be-
`cause of its unwieldly nature. The swelling and stiff-
`ness seemed to sufficiently deter motion in the cervical
`area.
`
`Preoperatively, clinical signs of the horses with
`CVM were rated on a scale of 0-4, after the classifica-
`tion of Mayhewf‘ There was clinical improvement of at
`least I grade in all affected horses 3-6 months post-
`operatively. The 3 normal horses showed no adverse
`central nervous system signs.
`Horses 4 and 6 showed gluteal myositis immediately
`following surgery. This was attributed to intraopera-
`tive positioning. Horse 6 recovered completely, but
`horse 4 showed slight gluteal atrophy throughout the
`study.
`
`
`
`Fig. 3.
`Instruments used in producing the opening to the
`spinal canal. from left to right include: a Hudson cranial drill
`brace, a twist drill, and a drill guard with adjustable screw and
`lock.
`
`Page 3 of 6
`Page 3 of 6
`
`

`
`10
`
`VETERINARY SURGERY
`
`January-March 1979
`
`VOL 3
`
`
`
`Fig. 4. Drilling of the opening between the vertebrae.
`Positioning is checked periodically to assure that the appear-
`ance of the disc in the center of the hole is as shown in the inset.
`
`All incisions healed by first intention. A hematoma
`appeared laterally to the incision in 1 horse but was
`resolved within several days.
`Postmortem examinations were performed on 9
`horses 3 months postoperatively and on 3 horses 6
`months postoperatively.
`
`Radiographic Results
`
`The operative sites were examined radiographically
`in all horses prior to euthanasia. Xeroradiographs were
`
`
`
`Fig. 5. The bone plug is fitted to the Cloward dowel impac-
`tor handle and placed in the hole. The fit is tight since the dowel
`is 1-2 mm larger than the hole.
`
`
`
`Fig. 6. Radiograph appearance of the operative site 3
`months postoperatively (arrow).
`
`made of the dissected cervical spinal column following
`the post mortem examination.
`Radiographic examination of 11 sites in 9 horses 3
`months postoperatively indicated 5 complete ar-
`throdeses, S fibrous fusions, and I nonunion. The re-
`sults of radiographic examination of 3 horses 6 months
`postoperatively were:
`1 nonfusion,
`1 fibrous fusion,
`and l arthrodesis. The radiographic appearance of
`complete fusion is illustrated in Fig. 6. The normal
`controls did not differ from the CVM horses. Radio-
`
`graphic interpretations are correlated with clinical im-
`provement in Table 2.
`Xeroradiographic examination substantiated these
`findings and assisted in the demonstration of the
`trabecular reorganization at the vertebral end plates.
`
`Gross Pathologic Results
`
`At necropsy, the spinal column was cut longitudi-
`nally as close to the midline as possible without damag-
`ing the cord. The appearance of complete fusion at
`C3_4 is shown in Fig. 7. Immobility created at the
`operative site was evaluated subjectively by the
`amount of movement during flexion and objectively by
`measuring the decrease in the diameter of the canal
`when the neck was flexed. The amount of movement
`
`im-
`
`the operative site is correlated with clinical
`at
`provement in Table 2.
`In the 9 horses evaluated 3 months postoperatively,
`2 surgical sites had not fused. 7 exhibited a strong
`fibrous fusion, and 2 had bony union. The average
`decrease in spinal canal diameter when the neck was
`flexed was 2.5 mm for the unfused, 0.8 mm for the
`fibrous fusion, and 0 mm for the bony fusions.
`Necropsy of the horses 6 months postoperatively
`demonstrated 1 nonunion and 2 fibrous fusions. The
`decrease in spinal canal diameter when the neck was
`
`Page 4 of 6
`Page 4 of 6
`
`

`
`No.
`
`1
`
`EQUINE CERVICAL SPINE
`
`-
`
`Wagner, et al
`
`11
`
`TABLE 2. Results of Cervical Stabilization at 3 and 6 Months Postoperatively
`
`
`Horse
`
`Breed
`
`Age
`
`Sex
`
`Operative Preoperative Postoperative
`Level
`Grade
`Grade
`
`Fladiographic
`Diagnosis
`
`Decrease in Canal
`Diameter at Operative
`Site on Flexion (mrn)
`
`Controls—3 months
`1 Quarter Horse
`2
`POA
`3 Quarter Horse
`Patients—3 months
`
`4 Thoroughbred
`5 Thoroughbred
`6 American Saddle
`7 Quarter Horse
`8 American Saddle
`9 Quarter Horse
`Patients—6 months
`
`6 mo M/C C3-..
`6 mo M/C C3—«)
`2 yr
`M/C CH
`
`M/C C3-.. CM
`1.5 yr
`F
`C3 .4
`2 yr
`F
`C2-3, 03..
`3 mo
`F
`C3-.
`2 yr
`3 mo M/C C3-..
`3 yr
`F
`CM
`
`0
`0
`0
`
`2.5
`2
`3.5
`3
`3
`2.5
`
`O
`0
`0
`
`1
`0
`2
`2
`1.5
`2
`
`Fused
`Fused
`Partial
`
`Not fused. partial
`Fused
`Fused, partial
`Partial
`Partial
`Fused
`
`0
`0
`1
`
`Not clone
`2
`0,2
`3
`1
`0
`
`0
`Partial
`3.5
`03...
`M
`6 mo
`10 Quarter Horse
`1
`Not fused
`3
`CH
`F
`15 mo
`11
`Thoroughbred Cross
`
`
`
`
`
`3 1.5 FusedM/C CH2 yr12 Thoroughtbred 0
`
`1.5
`
`
`
`M/C = Castrated male
`POA = Pony of the Americas
`
`Evacuation of cervical disc material is difficult in the
`
`horse because the disc space is strongly curved, and
`the disc material consists of heavy fibrous tissue with
`fibrocartilage firmly attached to the adjacent verte-
`brae. Although not encountered in this study, possible
`complications include hemorrhage from the ventral
`venous sinuses as described in dogs,” respiratory
`nerve damage.” and mechanical failure of the dowel?”
`
`Radiographic appearance of arthrodesis and the re-
`lief of clinical symptoms have been used as criteria for
`the quality of intervertebral fusion in humans.”-'0 Fu-
`sion was apparent radiographically at 6-8 weeks post-
`operatively. These patients were not examined after
`death to determine whether radiographic fusion re-
`tlected true osseous fusion. In this study, the radio-
`
`
`
`Fig. 7. The postmortem appearance of fusion at the surgical
`site 3 months after surgery (arrow).
`
`flexed was 3 mm in the case of the nonunion, and 0 mm
`in the fibrous unions.
`
`The results of histopathologic examination of the
`spinal cord and the operative fusion site will be the
`substance of another report.“
`
`Discussion
`
`Fusion of the cervical vertebrae in humans by an
`anterior approach has been practiced since 1958.9 This
`has also been successfully used in dogs,“"2-“"*2"’ and
`has met with acceptance in the treatment of canine
`caudal cervical malarticulation malformations because
`of the ease of exposure and minimal tissue damage
`incurred.
`The bone dowels inserted in the drilled out disc
`
`space act as a scaffold for the host osteogenic tissue.”
`Invasion and revascularization by host cells as early as
`3 days after placement of grafts has been reported.“
`Graft rejections have not constituted a clinical problem
`and recent studies have indicated that freezing may
`actually decreae host antigenic response.” The use of
`bone dowels obtained from equine cadavers markedly
`reduced the operative time.
`The operative approach to the ventral aspect of the
`equine cervical spine is not difficult, although some
`vital structures must be avoided. The carotid artery,
`vagus nerve, and recurrent laryngeal nerve must be
`retracted for extended periods, and in one case, there
`was permanent right laryngeal hemiplegia postopera-
`tively. This may have been due to intraoperative nerve
`damage.
`
`Page 5 of 6
`Page 5 of 6
`
`

`
`12
`
`VETERINARY SURGERY
`
`January—March 1979
`
`Vol. 8
`
`graphic diagnosis of complete versus early fusions
`could not be clearly differentiated.
`This study has established that operative arthrodesis
`is possible in the horse. Fusion might be more readily
`achieved if the instruments were larger, allowing
`placement of a 20—mm bone dowel. This would allow
`operative removal of a larger area of disc material
`which appears to interfere with fusion.
`The technique offers an alternative to ventral plating
`of the spine, wiring of the articular facets, and dorsal
`spinal grafting procedures for stabilization of the cer-
`vical spine. Possible applications other than the use in
`cervical vertebral malformation might include fixation
`of traumatic cervical fractures and cervical instability
`due to osteolytic processes.
`
`References
`
`1. Beech J: Cervical cord compression and wobbles in horses.
`Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract 22: 79, 1976.
`2. Fraser H, Palmer AC: Equine incoordination and Wobbler dis-
`ease in young horses. Vet Rec 80: 338, 1976.
`3. Mayhew IG, deLahunta A, Whitlock RH, et al: Spinal cord
`diseases in the horse. Cornell Vet 68 Suppl 6, 1978.
`4. Prickett ME: Equine spinal ataxia. Proc Am Assoc Equine Pract
`14: 147, 1968.
`5. Rooney JR: Equine incoordination 1. Gross morphology, Cor-
`nell Vet 53: 411, 1963.
`6. Steel ID, Whitten JH, Hutchins DR: Equine sensory ataxia
`“wobbles." Aust Vet J 35: 442, 1959.
`7. Southwick W0, Robinson RA: Recent advances in surgery of
`the cervical spine. Surg Clin North Am 41: 1661, 1961.
`8. Gage ED, Hall CL: Surgical repair of caudal cervical subluxa-
`tion in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 160: 424, 1972.
`9. Cloward RB: The anterior approach for removal of ruptured
`cervical discs. J Neurosurg 5: 602, 1958.
`10. Dohn DF: Anterior interbody fusion for treatment of cervical-
`disc conditions. JAMA 197: 175, 1966.
`ll. Popovic NA, VanderArk G, Kempe L: Ventral approach for
`surgical treatment of cervical disc disease in the dog. Am J
`Vet Res 32: 1155, 1971.
`12. Prata RG, Stoll SG: Ventral decompression and fusion for the
`
`treatment of cervical disc disease in the dog. J Am Amm
`Hosp Assoc 9: 462, 1973.
`I3. Simmons EH, Bhalla SK: Anterior cervical discectomy and fu-
`sion. J Bone Joint Surg 51B: 225, 1969.
`14. Dneland R, Furneaux RW, Kaye MM: Spinal fusion and dorsal
`laminectomy for rnidcervical and spondylolisthesis in a dog. J
`Am Vet Med Assoc 162: 366, 1973.
`15. Trotter EJ, deLahunta A, Geary JC, et al: Caudal cervical ver-
`tebral malformation malarticulation in Great Danes and
`Doberman Pinschers. J Am Vet Med Assoc 168: 917, 1976.
`16. Lumb VW, Brasmer TH: Improved spinal plates and hypother-
`mia as adjuncts to spinal surgery. J Am Vet Med Assoc
`157: 338, 1970.
`17. Robinson RA, Riley LH: Techniques of exposure and fusion of
`the cervical spine. Clin Orthop 109: 78, 1975.
`18. Martins AN: Anterior cervical discectomy with and without
`interbody bonegraft. J Neurosurg 44: 290, 1976.
`19. Riley LH: Surgical approaches to the anterior structures of the
`cervical spine. Clin Orthop 91: 16, 1973.
`20. Schneider JR, Bright RW: Anterior cervical fusion using pre-
`served bone allografts. Transplant Proc Suppl 1: 73, 1976.
`21. White AA, Jupiter J, Scuthwick WD, et al: An experimental
`study of the immediate load bearing capacity of three surgical
`constructions for anterior spine fusion. Clin Orthop 91: 21,
`1973.
`22. Brown MD, Malinin TI, Davis PB: A roentgenographic evalua-
`tion of frozen allografts versus autografts in anterior spine
`fusions. Clin Orthop 119: 231, 1976.
`23. Nicholson MW: Technique for obtaining iliac homograft for an-
`terior cervical fusion. J Neurosurg 41: 206, 1974.
`24. Wagner PC, Grant BD, Bagby GW, et al: Evaluation of cervical
`spine stabilization as a treatment in the equine “wobbler”
`syndrome. Submitted for publication to Vet Surg, November,
`1978.
`25. Swain SF: Ventral decompression of the cervical spinal cord in
`the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 168: 917, 1976.
`26. Gui L, Manes E, Luppino D: Massive homogenous osteoarticu-
`lar bone grafts. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 2: 151, 1976.
`27. Lozano AJ, Cestero HJ, Salyer KE: The early vascularization
`of onlay bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 58: 302, 1976.
`28. Langer F, Czitrom A, Pritzker KP, et at: The immunogenicity of
`fresh and frozen allogenic bone. J Bone Joint Surg 57-A: 216,
`1975.
`29. Fielding JM, Tuul A, Hawkins RJ: “Ondine’s curse," a compli-
`cation of upper cervical—spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg
`57-A: 1000, 1975.
`30. Keblish PA, Keygi KJ: Mechanical problems of the dowel graft
`in anterior cervical fusion. J Bone Joint Surg 49-A: 198, 1967.
`
`Page 6 of 6
`Page 6 of 6

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket