throbber
GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.
`EXHIBIT 1020
`IPR2015-to be assigned
`(Globus v. Bonutti)
`Page 1 of 15
`
`

`
`LANE AND MOORE
`
`-_s,n-_-,1;-3'8;-r,,-egg
`
`a surgical procedure dealing with the diseased disc has been devised, using
`the transperitoneal approach with ox bone implantation. The objective, ana-
`tomic and physiologic principles, operative treatment, and follow-up statistics
`are presented.
`The object of this procedure is:
`I. To completely remove the entire diseased disc with the cartilaginous
`end plates of the adjacent vertebrae.
`
`Incision
`
`Important pelvic structures, and
`FIG. 1.—Demonstrates abdominal incision.
`-
`location of 5th lumbar disc.
`
`2. To wedge the disc space open with an ox bone implantation in order to
`maintain normal space between the vertebrae until
`firm bony fusion is
`obtained.
`
`There are several undesirable features in the posterior approach by
`partial laminectomy, which have contributed in some degree to the large num-
`ber of unsatisfactory results. The usual approach by hemilaminectomy fre-
`538
`
`Page 2 of 15
`Page 2 of 15
`
`

`
`ggggg gv
`
`INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
`
`quently gives an inadequate exposure, so that only a small area of the disc
`space is visualized on the posterolateral side on which the laminectomy is
`performed. If the herniation of the diseased disc is in the intervertebral canal
`more anteriorly, it may not be visualized.
`In exposing the disc, retraction
`of the nerve roots may result
`in permanent damage or irritation to these
`structures. Hemorrhage from the anterior longitudinal veins often prevents
`
`FIG. 2.—Method of opening the anterior longitudinal ligament and adequately exposing
`the disc space and nucleus pulposus.
`
`adequate vision in demonstrating the lesion and has been found to be a factor
`in causing postoperative sequelae by hematoma formation followed by fibrosis
`and nerve root irritation with dural adhesions. Only a small portion of the
`disc and cartilaginous end plates can be removed by the posterior approach.
`Since the annulus fibrosus has been damaged, more trauma to the disc can
`539
`
`Page 3 of 15
`Page 3 of 15
`
`

`
`LANE AND MOORE
`
`:3-g-0 «,f_s;=r,-gr;
`
`produce a further herniation of the remaining nuclear material, with a subse-
`quent return of symptoms. Due to removal of the nuclear material, there is a
`tendency, first, toward subsequent narrowing of the disc space with resulting
`imbalance of weight bearing between the vertebral bodies and the correspond-
`ing facets and, second, joint instability. We have not obtained the desirable
`features of bone graft fusion and normal disc space by the posterior approach.
`
`Wedes of annulus
`I‘ ‘
`1 \
`
`removed
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 3.—(A) Removal of all material within the disc cavity.
`
`ligament with defect after complete
`longitudinal
`(B) Shows exposure of posterior
`removal of disc contents.
`
`In removing diseased discs, by the anterior transperitoneal route, the fol-
`lowing results, which we believe beneficial, have been obtained.
`(1) Good
`exposure to the entire disc space and cartilaginous end plates.
`(2) The 3rd,
`4th, and 5th discs can be examined and treated through the same abdominal
`incision. (3) Removal of the entire disc and all cartilaginous end plates, sulfi-
`$40
`
`Page 4 of 15
`Page 4 of 15
`
`

`
`gym 1321
`
`INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
`
`cient to obtain good bony union, can be accomplished. (4) Hemorrhage is
`easily controlled and does not occur into the spinal canal, and no trauma or
`retraction of the cord or nerve roots are necessary. (5) A large bone implan-
`tation can be wedged into the disc space to prevent narrowing until solid bony
`fusion between the adjacent vertebral bodies has taken place. These are major
`factors in determining a recovery from symptoms of degenerated disc.
`Some knowledge of anatomy of the abdominal cavity is necessary in carry-
`ing out the technic of the transperitoneal approach. The blood supply and
`mesenteric attachments of the lower ileum and colon, the relationship of the
`pelvic portions of the lower ureter to the spine and great vessels, and the
`relationship of the lower vena cava and common iliac vessels to the vertebral
`bodies should be thoroughly understood (Fig. I).
`
`
`
`ate of vert.
`
`"gongy bone pr.~»§v---«.....<.',
`
`
`
`
`
`
`V....4*‘€a>¢r"
`
`Perforation in post. lig.
`
`FIG. 4.—(A) Anterior view demonstrating removal of cartilaginous end plates exposing
`cancelous bone to promote fusion.
`
`(B) Same procedure in cross section.
`
`SURGICAL PROCEDURE
`
`the incision is paramedian from the
`this procedure,
`In carrying out
`symphysis to 3 inches above the umbilicus (Fig. I). The rectus sheath is
`incised I inch lateral to the midline, rectus muscle retracted laterally, peri-
`toneum incised, and the abdomen explored for any pathologic condition.
`Slight Trendelenburg position is obtained to keep the intestines in the upper
`abdomen. The redundant part of the sigmoid, cecum, and small gut is then
`displaced in the upper portion of the abdomen and maintained with moist
`laparotomy sponges to give good exposure to the lower lumbar and pelvic
`portion of the posterior peritoneum. The pelvic portion of the colon is then
`retracted to the left, after identifying the ureters. An incision is made in the
`posterior pelvic peritoneum in the midline. beginning over the sacrum and
`541
`
`Page 5 of 15
`Page 5 of 15
`
`

`
`LANE AND MOORE
`
`gin;--rl-9 g"5;-gay;
`
`extending to the bifurcation‘ of the aorta (Fig. I). The kidney bar on the
`operating table, previously placed beneath the 4th lumbar vertebra is now
`elevated sufficiently to push the lumbar spine into hyperextension and forward
`into the abdominal cavity. This gives better exposure and makes as wide as
`possible the intervertebral disc space in the lower lumbar spine, considerably
`increasing the access to the space to be opened. From I-2 inches below the
`
`End plates removed
`
`Graft in place
`
`FIG. 5.—Method of inserting ox bone crescent and peg in disc space.
`
`bifurcation of the aorta, the 5th disc is located by palpation between the
`common iliac vessels and is distinguished by the palpating finger by a distinct
`elevation with a rubbery consistency as contrasted to the hard vertebral bodies.
`The presacral sympathetic nerve plexus and veins are freed by blunt dissection
`and retracted to one side, thus completely visualizing the anterior longitudinal
`ligament over the prominence of the 5th lumbar disc. The disc can then be
`$42
`
`Page 6 of 15
`Page 6 of 15
`
`

`
`gbugg-3 gt?
`
`INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
`
`examined for consistency. By lowering the kidney bar to reduce the lordosis,
`an estimate of disc narrowing is obtained.
`To enter the disc space the kidney bar is re-elevated and a transverse
`incision made across the anterior longitudinal ligament at the lower margin
`of the 5th vertebra sufficient to give access to the entire anterior disc space.
`A vertical incision is made from the mid portion of the transverse incision to
`the upper margin of the sacrum. This allows for the turning back of a flap
`of the anterior ligament to give access to the entire nuclear material (Fig. 2).
`The state of the nuclear material can then be easily ascertained. The contents
`of the disc space are easily removed by a curette, with a deep cup, and a sharp
`cutting edge, which facilitates the cutting away of
`the cartilaginous end
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 6.—Closure of disc space by suture of anterior longitudinal
`ligament
`
`plates, as well as the nuclear material. It is necessary for the handles of the
`curette to be about 8 inches in length, with a cross bar at the proximal end
`to get sufficient leverage and motion to cut away the bands of the annulus
`fibrosus and cartilage. The disc contents are removed until the ligaments
`retaining the disc are visible around the entire disc space (Fig. 3, A & B).
`Often there is relaxation and bulging of the ligament outward, due to previous
`degeneration of the disc material, allowing the disc space to narrow and bulge.
`This outward bulging may be most prominent on either side or posteriorly,
`and it is always more prominent in these locations than anteriorly since the
`annuli fibrosi are stronger and several times thicker anteriorly than on the
`sides or posteriorly. The ligaments at the posterior and lateral sides are then
`543
`
`Page 7 of 15
`Page 7 of 15
`
`

`
`LANE AND MOORE
`
`gag-g; ;{=*;:;s;r-;
`
`thoroughly explored with a small blunt instrument to indicate any weakness
`or defective space at the site where preoperative clinical findings have sug-
`gested nerve root pressure.
`If defects or openings are found, they are further
`spread open to ascertain if a portion of the nuclear material has been extruded
`through the defect (Fig. 3B). Such material,
`if found,
`is removed. After
`sufficient search has been made to determine that all nuclear material has been
`
`excised, the cartilaginous end plates are completely removed from the surface
`of the vertebrae by a sharp curette or chisel (Fig. 4, A & B). This pro-
`cedure is done last, as it may cause considerable oozing of blood.
`If done
`before a thorough search of the disc has been made, it may obscure a defect
`in the ligament or a portion of nuclear material
`in the lateral gutter.
`If
`bleeding is too free following removal of the end plates, a tight packing with
`a gauze sponge for several minutes will usually suffice to control it.
`To maintain the disc space in its normal width while fusion is progressing,
`a specially prepared ox bone wedge is used. This was selected on the basis
`of surgical work previously reported by Orel1"’ working on fractures, in which
`he demonstrated that ox bone heterogenous implantations made an excellent
`bridge and were slowly absorbed over a period of from 12-20 months, grad-
`ually becoming a spongy mass through which new capillaries and osteoblasts
`could permeate and form new bone. This course of events permits gradual
`replacement of the ox bone wedge by homologous bone from the adjacent
`vertebral bodies and leaves less chance for narrowing during the fusion
`process. The ox bone wedge now used consists of a crescent shaped piece
`with beveled edges, which is driven into the posterior portion of the disc space
`with the spine hyperextended (Fig. 5B). Between the wings of the crescent
`wedge, a large square bone peg of the same material is driven, being pre-
`viously measured to fit just inside the wings of the crescent (Fig. 5C). This
`almost completely fills the disc space. Following wedging of the disc space,
`the flaps of the anterior ligament are closed and sutured over the disc space
`in their normal position, thus completely encasing the ox bone within the disc
`space (Fig. 6). The kidney rest is lowered, reducing the hyperextension of
`the spine and spreading the disc space open wider by impinging on the ox
`bone wedge.
`Exposure of the 3rd‘ and 4th disc spaces is slightly more technical than
`that of the 5th. However, complete visualization can be accomplished. This
`is due to the fact that the 5th disc lies below the bifurcation of the great
`vessels, whereas,
`the 3rd and 4th are beneath the aorta and vena cava.
`Exposure of the 3rd and 4th is readily achieved for examination, and it is
`always done if there is any clinical evidence of nerve root irritation or joint
`instability on examination previous to surgery. This is done by extension
`upward on the posterior peritoneal incision over the iliac vessels either to the
`right or left of the midline and along the lateral border of the spine, sufficiently
`to expose the 3rd and 4th discs. If the incision is on the right side, the ureter
`is retracted outward and the loose areolar tissue gently dissected through
`until the lateral border of the vena cava is visualized. A short bladed right
`544
`
`Page 8 of 15
`Page 8 of 15
`
`

`
`Mame 127
`Number 3
`
`INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
`
`angle blunt retractor is placed beneath the lateral border of the vena cava,
`and with gentle retraction it is displaced to the left along with the aorta, until
`the disc space is adequately exposed.
`If exposure is done from a left sided
`approach instead of the right, the incision is the same as that of the right,
`except that the lateral border of the aorta is encountered first instead of the
`vena cava.
`In a like manner the aorta is freed at its lateral border and is
`
`retracted toward the right side, with the vena cava, until adequate exposure
`
`H Aofa
`
`4-ih. lumbar ver-l.
`
`
`
`FIG. 7.—Method used in exposing the 3rd or 4th disc spaces.
`
`If deemed necessary,
`of the disc space is obtained from this side (Fig. 7).
`this disc space may be treated in a similar manner as already described for
`the 5th. Closure, following the completion of this procedure, consists of
`suture of the anterior longitudinal ligament to its adjacent vertebra, com-
`pletely closing the intervertebral space. This is accomplished with sutures of
`cotton No. 30. Closure of the posterior and anterior peritoneal opening is
`obtained with sutures of interrupted cotton No. 70. Fascial
`layers of the
`anterior and posterior rectus sheaths are approximated with interrupted
`sutures of cotton No. 30.
`
`545
`
`Page 9 of 15
`Page 9 of 15
`
`

`
`LANE AND MOORE
`
`POSTOPERATIVE CARE
`
`gag-g; g_s;=r,-gr;
`
`Postoperative care has been most conservative, in order to arrive at a
`definite conclusion as to the ideal convalescence which will not interfere with
`
`fusion. Measures to combat gaseous distention and phlebitis are followed.
`The patients are placed in bed with firm rigid support beneath the mattress.
`No braces or casts are applied at this time. The patients are kept in a supine
`position on a hard surface for 30 days. X-rays of the lumbar spine are then
`taken and a body cast is applied to cover the entire lumbar spine and sacrum.
`
`FIG. 8.—-(a) (Left) AP X-ray for position of bone irnplantations 30 days postoperative.
`(a) (Right) Lat X-ray for position of bone implantation 30 days postoperative.
`
`The lumbar spine is held in slight hyperextension. Some patients have insisted
`on being out of bed on the 15th postoperative day because they have felt
`normal. Against our advice, this was done by three patients without support,
`and they developed no back complaints. The patients are allowed to be
`ambulant and to return to their homes after the application of the cast and
`examination, including roentgenograms, for evaluation of progress.
`If con-
`valescence is satisfactory, they are then supplied with a lumbosacral belt and
`instructed to refrain from strenuous use of the back; they return at monthly
`intervals for further check—up examination, including physical examination,
`check on symptoms, and roentgenograms, to determine the progress of fusion.
`546
`
`Page 10 of 15
`Page 10 of 15
`
`

`
`fi$g=:,13‘-'7
`
`IN TERVERTEBRAL DISC
`
`This procedure was first started at the Marine Hospital on February 27,
`1946, and to the present date all discs requiring surgery have been treated
`in this manner.
`
`CLINICAL MATERIAL
`
`A diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus was made in 97 cases admitted
`to this hospital between February I, 1946, and February I, 1947. All patients
`were treated conservatively by peridural block, traction, or plaster body cast,
`or a combination of these until such treatment was found ineffectual in the
`
`individual case. Thirty-six cases either failed to respond to such treatment
`or their improvement was insuflicient to allow return to a gainful occupation.
`These 36 cases were subjected to surgery and form the basis of this report.
`
`3|
`
`Of
`31>
`38’.
`
`O.
`
`(Left) AP X-ray for progress 5 mos. postoperative. Fusion present.
`FIG. 8.—(b)
`(b)
`(Right) Lat X-ray for progress 5 mos. postoperative. Fusion present.
`0
`
`Of the patients undergoing surgery, 29 were males and 7 females. The
`average age was 31.9 years—the youngest 18 years and the oldest 52. Twenty-
`nine of the patients followed manual occupations; 7 held sedentary positions.
`The average duration of symptoms at the time of surgery was 19.7 months.
`Of the 36 cases undergoing surgery; I case had sciatic neuritis alone, 3 cases
`had back complaints and findings without neurological changes in the lower
`extremities, and the remaining 32 cases had back and lower extremity symp-
`toms and neurological findings.
`Roentgen examination of the lumbar spine (A—P and lateral) revealed:
`Narrowing of the suspected space in 8 cases; evidence of previous partial
`hemilaminectomy in 4 cases; spondylolysis in 3 cases; spondylolisthesis in I
`case; congenital defect of the lamina in I case; and lumbarization of the Ist
`sacral vertebra in I case. Pantopaque myelography appeared indicated in 7
`patients to substantiate further the diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus
`547
`
`Page 11 of 15
`Page 11 of 15
`
`

`
`LANE AND MOORE
`
`Marc
`An--n ;«_s;:r9z;rg
`
`or to rule out intravertebral canal pathology. The test was suggestive of the
`former in 3 patients and negative in 4.
`
`FINDINGS AT SURGERY
`
`At the time of operation, 25 of the 36 cases (69.4 per cent) had single disc
`lesions as follows: Lumbar IV—3 patients; Lumbar V—22 patients. Eleven
`of the 36 cases (30.6 per cent) had multiple disc lesions as follows: Lumbar
`III and V—I patient, Lumbar IV and V—9 cases; Lumbar V and VI—
`I case.
`
`FIG. 9.—-(a) Lat X-ray for position of bone implantation 30 days postoperative.
`X-ray for progress II mos. postoperative. Fusion present.
`
`(b) Lat
`
`POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS
`
`Postoperative complications occurred in 5 patients, or 14 per cent, as
`follows: Phlebothrombosis (femoral vein) 2 cases (5.6 per cent); wound
`separation I case (2.8 per cent) ; hypostatic pneumonia I case ( 2.8 per cent) ;
`cystitis (acute) I case (2.8 per cent). Of the 2 cases of phlebothrombosis,
`I
`was of minor intensity and had no sequelae. The other patient continues to
`have minor residual swelling of the involved extremity. The postoperative
`wound separation occurred on the 11th postoperative day in a very obese and
`uncooperative patient. Evisceration did not occur. However, he developed
`a ventral hernia which has subsequently been repaired. The hypostatic pneu-
`monia occurred on the 5th postoperative day and was controlled within 48
`548
`
`Page 12 of 15
`Page 12 of 15
`
`

`
`“"“"'° 1"
`Number 3
`
`INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
`
`hours by chemotherapy. The patient had no sequelae. The complication of
`postoperative cystitis appeared on the 5th day of convalescence and was sec-
`ondary to catheterization. Forced fluids and sulfadiazine controlled this com-
`plication within a period of three days.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Since the time of surgery, the patients have been followed as outlined
`previously. All cases, with one exception, have returned for monthly
`check-ups. This patient was last seen after his 4th postoperative month, at
`
`TABLE I.
`
`Leg
`Back
`Symptoms Symptoms
`
`Neurologic
`Findings
`
`General Status
`——
`
`Cases
`
`Percent Total
`
`Less than 4 months
`( 10 cases)
`
`4-8 months
`(14 cases)
`
`8-12 months
`(11 cases)
`
`Unchanged
`Improved
`Asymptomatic
`
`Unchanged
`Improved
`Asymptomatic
`
`Unchanged
`Improved
`Asymptomatic
`
`2
`8
`0
`
`0
`13
`1
`
`I
`4
`6
`
`1
`1
`8
`
`0
`8
`7
`
`1
`2
`8
`
`1
`1
`8
`
`0
`-I
`10
`
`0
`4
`7
`
`1
`9
`0
`
`0
`13
`1
`
`1
`S
`S
`
`2.9 per cent
`25.1 per cent
`
`37.0 per cent
`2.9 per cent
`
`2.9 per cent
`14.3 per cent
`14.3 per cent
`
`Total unchanged
`Total improved
`Total asymptomatic
`
`5.8 per cent
`77.0 per cent
`17.2 per cent
`
`TABLE I.—Tabulation of symptoms and general status of cases in postoperative periods
`from I to 4 mos.—4 to 8 mos.—and 8 to 12 mos.
`
`which time he was asymptomatic. Since he has subsequently been lost for
`follow-up examination, his case has been excluded from the result series.
`Final results at the time of this writing are, of course,
`impossible to
`evaluate, since inadequate time has elapsed. Furthermore, the series is too
`small for statistical value. However, definite trends toward an ultimate result
`can be seen. For convenience of analysis the postoperative status of these
`cases has been divided into 4-month periods as follows:
`
`Less than 4 months ~— I0 patients
`4 to 8 months
`-— 14 patients
`8 to I2 months — II patients
`
`Table I utilizes the above grouping and tabulates the status of the patients
`at the time of this writing.
`In brief, 2 or 5.8 per cent, of the 35 cases are
`unchanged, and 6, or 17.2 per cent, are asymptomatic. The remaining 27
`cases, or 77 per cent, are improved. However, without exception in this
`improved group, residual symptoms and findings have decreased in intensity
`549
`
`Page 13 of 15
`Page 13 of 15
`
`

`
`LANE AND MOORE
`
`gg-_=-g-cgr_s;-gsgrg
`
`and frequency in direct relationship to the length of time from the date of
`surgery. This observation tends to indicate that eventually these patients will
`be classified as symptom-free. Generally the chart demonstrates that this
`complete recovery is slow. This is to be expected, since advaiced bony fusion
`of the involved intervertebral joint is necessary before the patient becomes
`completely asymptomatic. This principle is substantiated in the roentgen-ray
`findings which are tabulated in Table 2. Those patients in whom there is
`demonstrated bony fusion by roentgen-ray are asymptomatic.
`It has been found that bony callus appears in 3-4 months in some cases.
`Fusion is usually not seen by roentgenograms until the 8-12 month period.
`
`Time Intervals
`
`TABLE II.—X-ray Findings.
`Callus Absent
`Callus Present
`
`Fusion Present
`
`Less than 4 months (10 cases) . . . . . .
`4-8 months (14 cases) . . . .
`.
`. . .
`. .
`. .
`.
`8-12 months. .
`.
`. . .
`. . .
`. . .
`. .
`.
`. . .
`. .
`.
`
`.
`. .
`.
`.
`. . .
`.
`.
`. .
`
`S
`0
`0
`
`5
`
`5
`13
`5
`
`23
`
`0
`1
`6
`
`7
`
`TABLE II.—X-ray findings in postoperative cases indicating progress of fusion in the
`4 mos. period of the Ist year.
`
`At the present time one case demonstrates early fusion in the 4—8 month group
`(Fig. 8). One of the cases in the 8-12 month group demonstrates fusion and
`is illustrated in Fig. 9.
`All patients have been advised most conservatively in regard to returning
`to duty or work. It has been our feeling that definite harm to the softened
`bone graft and early callus might be produced by too strenuous activity.
`Though many patients have felt capable of performing duty after three
`months of convalescence, we have not recommended their return to work
`until there is adequate evidence of early fusion or advanced callus formation.
`Table 3 tabulates the work status of the 35 cases. As may be seen in the
`table,
`these patients do not return to duty until after the 4th month of
`convalescence. Fourteen patients or 40 per cent have returned to duty.
`At this time, one of the 8-12 month group is considered as unsatisfactory.
`The patient’s symptoms of back pain have not shown enough improvement
`for any rehabilitation, the sciatic symptoms are improved, and callus forma-
`tion is present on roentgen-ray examination.
`This procedure has been devised as an attempt to improve on some of the
`undesirable features of the posterior approach and the surgical treatment of
`symptoms caused by degeneration of the intervertebral disc. It is realized that
`meticulous care must be used to exclude other diseases and intra-spinal
`lesions before carrying out
`this procedure; although it gives excellent
`exposure to the disc, it does not allow for complete exploration of the spinal
`canal and cord. Further, it is our opinion that all clinical symptoms and
`physical findings should be carefully analyzed to localize the nerve roots and
`550
`
`Page 14 of 15
`Page 14 of 15
`
`

`
`ggg;-,;-3,1321
`
`INTERVERTEBRAL DISC
`
`disc spaces before surgery, thus efiecting a better evaluation of the findings
`at operation with the preoperative symptoms. It is realized that as small a
`series of cases as is now presented will not be sufiicient to make a definite
`evaluation as to its efiiciency in treating degenerated discs. Neither is the
`duration of time that has elapsed since surgery sufficient to allow a final con-
`clusion on this small series. However, we believe there are certain aspects
`in the principles applied and trends in the beneficial results so far obtained
`which make this publication worth while.
`
`TABLE III.—Duty Status.
`
`Time Interval
`
`Of? Duty
`
`Light Duty
`
`Full Duty
`
`. . .
`. .
`Less than 4 months (10 cases) . . . . .
`4-8 months (14 cases) . . . . . . .
`. . . . . . . .
`. .
`8-12 months (11 cases) . . . . . .
`. . . . . . . . . .
`
`10
`9
`2
`
`0
`3
`3
`
`0
`2
`6
`
`21
`(60 per cent)
`
`6
`(17.1 per cent)
`
`8
`(22.9 per cent)
`
`31
`(60 per cent)
`
`6
`(17.1 per cent)
`
`8
`(22.9 per cent)
`
`TABLE III.—Duty status of postoperative cases, arranged in 4 mos. periods during Ist year.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`
`I. A method of complete removal of either the 3rd, 4th, or 5th lumbar
`intervertebral disc, with technic to fuse the joint, is presented.
`2. The principles and technic are outlined.
`3. This procedure has been used since February 27, 1946, in 36 cases of
`herniated intervertebral discs. Postoperative complications have occurred in
`five patients. There have been no deaths.
`4. A preliminary survey of monthly follow-up studies on 35 of the 36
`postoperative cases reveals six cases asymptomatic, 27 improved, and two
`unchanged. The course of improved cases is toward complete recovery from
`symptoms existing prior to surgery. Fourteen patients have resumed either
`light or regular duty.
`5. The obliteration of the involved disc space by bony fusion is necessary
`for complete amelioration of symptoms.
`BIBLIOGRAPHY
`1 Poppen, James L.: Herniated Intervertebral Disc: An Analysis of 400 verified cases.
`New England J. Med., 232: 211,
`2 Kirstein, Lemart: Follow-up Examination of Operated and Non-operated Cases, with
`Clinical Symptoms of Herniated Disc Acta Med. Scandinav., CXX: 93, I945.
`3 Lane, I. D.: Surgical Treatment of Intervertebral Discs. New Orleans M. 8: S. J.,
`973 270-275. 1944-
`4 Orell, Svante: Studies of Bone Implantation, New Bone Formation Implantation of
`Os Purum and Transplantation of Os Novum. Acta Chir. Sca.ndinav., (Supp. 31)
`743 1» 1934-
`5 Orell, Svante: Surgical Bone Grafting with O5 Purum, Os Norum and Boiled Bone.
`J. Bone and Joint Surg., 19: 873, I937.
`551
`
`Page 15 of 15
`Page 15 of 15

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket