throbber
(cid:47)(cid:56)(cid:51)(cid:44)(cid:49)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:59)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:20)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:21)
`(cid:47)(cid:88)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:89)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:38)(cid:72)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:68)
`(cid:56)(cid:54)(cid:3)(cid:51)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:82)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:28)(cid:15)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:15)(cid:26)(cid:21)(cid:20)
`
`Page 1
`
`

`
`164
`
`Moore
`
`5.¢ Summary of Comparative Safety and Tolerobiliiy .
`6. Conclusion .
`,
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`.
`.
`
`. 190
`.
`.
`. .. 191
`
`AbSi'l'ClC‘l'
`
`Non-prescription (over-the-counter [OTCl) analgesics are used for the short-
`term treatment of acute painful conditions of mild to moderate intensity in
`
`everyday life. Well documented safety and efficacy, a rapid onset of action and a
`
`flexible daily dosing regimen are essential in this context. Film—t:oated, immedi-
`
`ate-release.
`
`low-dose diclofenac potassium, developed for OTC use, offers a
`
`flexible daily dosing regimen with an initial dose of two tablets (2 X l2.5mg)
`
`followed by one or two tablets up to a maximum daily dose of six tablets ("£5 mg’
`
`day). The maximum plasma drug concentration is reached 30 minutes after
`
`administration. and the mean terminal half-life is I-2 hours. allowing a 4- to
`
`6-hour duration of activity. depending on the condition.
`
`Thirteen randomised. douhle—blind trials with both placebo and active controls
`
`have demonstrated the efficacy of diclofenac potassium l2.5mg tablets in condi-
`
`tions suitable for treatment with OTC medication, for example, acute lower back
`
`pain. headache. acute pain after dental extraction. symptoms of cold and influenza
`
`{including fever). and dysmenorrhoea. A single dose of dielofenac potassium
`
`l2.5mg is the lowest recommended effective dose. A two-tablet single dose of
`
`25mg is at least as effective as ibuprofen 400mg. A flexible dosing regimen of an
`
`initial two tablets followed by one or two tablets up to a total daily dose of 75mg is
`
`as effective as ibuprofen used in comparable fashion Up to a total daily dose of
`
`1200111 g.
`
`The incidence of adverse events in patients taking single or multiple doses of
`
`diclofenac potassium is similar to that of ibuprofen and placebo. In a safety study
`
`conducted to compare diclofenac potassium with ibuprofen for up to 3 months in
`
`patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, no differences in the pattern of adverse
`
`events were noted. There was no evidence of either hepatic injury or cardiovascu-
`
`lar safety—related issues at any time during the study.
`
`Patients are generally capable of taking dielofenac potassium appropriately. A
`
`maximum OTC treatment duration of 5 days for pain and 3 days for fever is
`recommended.
`
`1. Introduction
`
`formulations. Diclofenac sodium was first marketed
`
`Diclofenac is a potent NSAID with anti-inflarn-
`
`ry use. Since its introduction. diclofenac sodium has
`
`matory. analgesic and antipyretic properties. Chemi— been used by >1 billion patients. Dielofenae potassi-
`
`cally it
`
`is a phenylacetic acid derivative. Ural
`
`um was introduced in the early l98Us as Cat,atlarn®r'
`
`diclofenac is available in sodium— or potassium—salt
`
`Voltaren Rapid®, primarily for analgesic indica-
`
`in Japan in 1974 as Voltaren® ' for anti—inllammato—
`
`l The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
`
`-'21 200? Adis Data Information av. All rights reserved.
`
`Clin Drug Invest 200?; 2? (3)
`
`Page 2
`Page 2
`
`

`
`Diclofena-C Potassiunt 125mg Tablets in Mild to Moderate Pain and Fever
`
`165
`
`12.5
`
`25
`
`50
`
`‘ID
`
`9 B '
`
`.-’
`
`E
`5
`
`43 2 I O
`
`b
`
`10
`
`D-osaimgi
`
`
`M0:4.‘:U1at--.1D2:to
`
`dE
`
`E5
`
`U2
`
`AUGturnol-h.tL)
`
`tions. Currently.
`
`it
`
`is approved as an over-the-
`
`counter (OTC) medication in many countries around
`
`the world. forexatnple Germany. Switzerland. Italy.
`
`Spain, The Netherlands. Norway. Sweden. Hungary,
`
`Poland. Iceland. Czech Republic. Slovakia. Latvia.
`Lithuania. Russia. Australia. New Zealand and sev-
`
`eral countries in South America.
`
`This article gives an overview of the relevant
`
`pharmacological aspects, clinical efficacy and toler-
`
`ahility ot' low-dose diclofenac and underlines its
`
`suitability for non-prescription use.
`
`2. Phctrmctcodynarnics
`
`Diclofenac is a typical. potent. non-selective in-
`
`hibitor of cyclo-oxygcnasc (COX). which reduces
`
`the formation oi‘ the proinflammalory and nocicep-
`
`rive prostaglandins. In addition. diclofenac inhibits
`
`the synthesis of prostacycliu and thromb-oxane and
`
`downregulates the lipoxygenasc pathwayl” Fur-
`
`thermore, it has been reported to decrease levels of
`
`the proinflatnlnatory cylol-tine interleukin-6 and sub-
`
`stance P in the synovial fluid and plasma of patients
`with rheumatoid arthritislii
`
`The concentrations required to produce 50% in-
`
`12.5
`
`25
`
`50
`
`hibition of enzyme activity {IC5n) of diclofettae for
`COX-I and COX-2 in vitro in a human whole blood
`
`assay are 0.075 t1molfL and 0.038 ].tmo|}L, respec-
`
`tively. and the concentratiort of diclofenac that in-
`
`hibits COX-2 activity by 80% (ICgn} produces ap-
`proximately '.-’t)% inhibition of COX-l.l3' The con-
`
`centrations reached in viva during an ascending dose
`
`pharmacokinctic study [figure I) were well within
`
`the range of the in vttm and ex vivo COX inhibitory
`concentrations!“ Diclofenac helongs to the class of
`
`drugs presenting almost a similar level of inhibition
`
`for both COX-I and COX-2 {<5-fold COX-2 selec-
`
`Dose (mg)
`Fig. 1. Ascending dose pharmacokineties of dicloitanac in study
`F339“: (a) maximum concentration {Cruz} and {bi area under the
`plasma concentration-tlrna curve {AUG} at dlflarsnt closes.
`
`Diclofenac is highly bound to serum protein
`
`(99.7 96], mainly albumin. and it is a weak acid {pKa
`
`= 4.0) and amphiphilic. Because of these character-
`
`istics. diclofennc distributes unequally.
`
`it reaches
`
`high concentrations and persists in inflamed tissue,
`
`as is demonstrated by its measured concentration in
`
`the synovial tiuid in rheumatic diseases. while the
`
`tivc).i-*1 The IQ“: of diclofcnac indicates that
`
`it is
`
`eiimination in the central body compartment such as
`
`slightly more specific in inhibiting the activity of
`
`COX-2 than COX-I: however, no major difference
`
`blood, liver and kidney is fast with a half-life of l—2
`hours.‘-""’i NSAlDs such as diclofenac associate and
`
`is observed at the therapeutically relevant inhibition
`
`dissociate with alhutnin rapidly. The ongoing disso-
`
`potency lC3o.
`
`ciation rnakes hound drug available for transvascu-
`
`-Q 2603'’ Anti: Dcrta ln1'orI'nertion BV. All rigt't1'5ra:t:ewacI_
`
`Clin Drug Invest 200?; 2? (3)
`
`Page 3
`Page 3
`
`

`
`166
`
`Moore
`
`lar exchange towards the target compartment and
`
`salts are equivalent with respect
`
`to the rate and
`
`thereby diminishes
`
`the pharmacokinetic signifi-
`
`extent of absorption, as measured by maximum con-
`
`cance of binding measured in 1.-'r'Iro.l°l
`
`centration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concen-
`
`[t
`
`is now well established that COX-2 plays a
`
`tration-time
`
`curve
`
`(AUC),
`
`respectively, when
`
`major role in no-cieeption if inflammatory processes
`are involved. However, there is also evidence that
`
`COX-l may play an important
`
`role in the local
`
`transmission and central integration of pain, and that
`simultaneous inhibition of both COX-1 and COX-2
`
`is generally superior to inhibition of either alone.l7l
`
`This is especially relevant because the anti-inflam-
`
`matory effect of diclofenac is minimal at the doses
`
`used in OTC medications. and the objective in this
`
`setting is pain relief rather than an anti—inflammato—
`
`ry action.
`
`3. Phormacokinelic Properties
`
`normalised by dose.l3l Dose-normalised AUCs were
`
`27.7 i 8.6 nmol - l1.fL - tune] for diclofenac sodium
`
`and 24 i 6.3 nmol - h!L - ttmol for diclofenac potas-
`sium.
`
`Diclofenac is completely absorbed. First—pass
`
`metabolism accounts for approximately 40% of an
`
`oral dose, which means that about 60% of the ad-
`
`ministered dose reaches the systemic circulation as
`
`unchanged die|ofenac.l'3"l Absolute bioavailability of
`
`low-dose diclofenac potassium from tablet formula-
`tions was investigated by Hinz et al.“9l The mean
`
`absolute bioavailability of diclofenac potassium
`
`12.5mg (administered as a single dose of a 12.5mg
`
`Immediate—rclease, sugar-coated diclofenac po-
`
`capsule-shaped tablet] and 25mg [ administered as a
`
`tassium tablets dissolve rapidly in the stomach and
`
`single dose of two l2.5mg tablets) was 63. I % in the
`
`the time to maximum concentration (tum) is approx-
`
`12.5mg group and 65.1% in the 25mg group, results
`
`imately 30 minutes.
`
`In contrast, enteric-coated
`
`that were consistent with those of a previous investi-
`
`diclofenac sodium (Voltarcn®, Voltarol®) dissolves
`in the more alkaline environment of the duodenum
`
`gation“”3l showing 5{)—6[l‘;‘/E.- oral availability. The
`9(l";’l:.- Cls for the AUCM and AUCI (t = 4h) ratios for
`
`(tmax >2 hours}. The two salts of diclofenac,
`
`the two oral regimens were 82.6, 103.4 (point esti-
`
`diclofenac potassium and diclofenac sodium. have
`
`mate 92.4) and 86.2, 112.9 (point estimate 98.6),
`
`the same mechanism of action and identical pharma-
`
`respectively, which are within the acceptance crite-
`
`codynamic effects, are absorbed to the same extent
`
`ria for bioequivalencc (80, 125).”-"1 In conclusion.
`
`following oral administration?“ and are distributed,
`biotransformed and eliminated in identical fashion.
`
`the study demonstrated that diclofenac potassium is
`
`rapidly and well absorbed at low doses of 12.5 and
`
`3.] Absorption
`
`The bioequivalence of diclofenac potassium has
`
`not been tested in a pharmaeokinctic study of stan-
`
`25mg and shows linear pharmacokinetics.
`
`After ingestion of one or two diclofenac potassi-
`
`um l2.5mg tablets the median tmax was approxi-
`mately 30 minutes.l'°*"'l5l With increasing doses of
`
`dard crossover design. However, Several trials have
`
`diclofenac potassium the corresponding AUC as
`
`measured plasma concentrations after various doses
`
`well as the Cmax were proportionally increased and
`
`of either diclofenac sodium or diclofenac potassium
`were administe1°ed to lasted individuals in either
`
`dose linearity has been confirmed for the low-dose
`
`range of l2.5—50mg {figure l).l4l In volunteers given
`
`buffered solution (pH 7.5) or plain water. An analy-
`sis of the combined data from these studies (95
`
`a high—l"at breakfast, the Cm.-ix of a single dose of
`
`diclofenac potassium l2.5mg was decreased and the
`
`individuals given diclofenac sodium and 2t given
`
`tmax increased.“-‘J The AUC and the elimination
`
`diclofenac potassium) shows that the two diclofenac
`
`half-life (tips), on the other hand, were not affected.
`
`-'21 200? Adis Doro Information av. All rights reserved.
`
`Clin Drug Invest 200?.‘ 2? (3)
`
`Page 4
`Page 4
`
`

`
`Diclofenac Potassium 125mg Tablets in Mild to Moderate Pain and Fever
`
`113'?
`
`Thus. the total amount of drug absorbed does not
`
`3.4 Elimlnotion
`
`seem to be affected by the presence of food in the
`stomach.
`
`The bioequivalence of several rapid—re|ease for-
`
`mulations of low-dose diclofenac potassium (cap-
`
`sules, and sugar-— or ti|m—coat.ed tablets in a variety
`
`of shapes) has been confirmed in several bic-avai-
`
`lability studies taking into account intra-subject va-
`riability.“"‘6l The film-coated tablets were used in
`
`the diclofenac potassium |2.5mg phase III develop-
`
`ment programme.
`
`Since the quantities of diclofenac potassium ad-
`
`ministered are
`
`usually
`
`lower
`
`than
`
`those of
`
`diclofenac sodium, the potential for end—organ fail-
`
`ure or metabolic interaction with diclofenae poten-
`
`tial is accordingly lower. Thus, it is relevant to note
`
`that the pharmacokinetic data presented in the fol-
`
`Total systemic clearance of diclofenac from plas-
`
`ma is 263 i 56 lTIl.ufITlll'I.ll2l The terminal
`
`tv,[3 in
`
`plasma is 1-2 hours. Four of the metabolites, includ-
`
`ing the two active ones, also have a short plasma tv,[5
`
`of 1-3 hours. A fifth, virtually inactive. metabolite
`
`(3'—hydroxy—4'—methoxy—cliclofenac) has a much
`
`longer plasma half-life. Approximately 60% of the
`
`administered dose of diclofenac potassium is excret-
`
`ed in the urine as the glucuronide of the intact
`molecule and as metabolites, most of which are also
`
`converted to glucuronide conjugates?“ Less than
`
`1% is excreted unchanged. The remainder of the
`
`dose is eliminated as metabolites through the bile in
`the faeces.l”l
`
`lowing sections are from studies of high—dose
`
`3.5 Influence of Age and Renal or
`
`diclofenac sodium, not low-dose diclofenac potassi-
`urn.
`
`Hepatic Function
`
`3.2 Distribution
`
`DieloI'enae is 99.7% protein bound with a volume
`of distribution of U. l 2-0. I 7 Li'kg.“7l
`
`3.3 Biotronsformotion
`
`After absorption. diclofcnac is metabolised by
`both phase I and II enzyines.'”“ The biotI'ansforma-
`
`No relevant age—dependent differences in the ab-
`
`sorption, metabolism or excretion of diclofenac
`
`impairment does not
`have been observed. Renal
`result in accumulation of diclofenac with the usual
`
`dosage schedule.l3°1 At a creatinine
`
`clearance
`
`<10 n1Lfmin_. the steady-state plasma concentrations
`
`of the hydroxy metabolites are about four times
`
`higher than in healthy individuals. However, these
`
`metabolites are ultimately cleared through the bile.
`
`Lion ofdielofenac includes glucuronidation of sever-
`
`Nevertheless. neither chronic hepatitis nor non-de-
`
`al phenolic metabolites, which a1'e generated by
`
`single and multiple hydroxylation and methoxyla-
`
`compensated cirrhosis affect the pharmacokinetics
`or ntetabolism of diclofenaelz" While active alco-
`
`tion. Two of these phenolic metabolites are biologi-
`
`holic cirrhosis may increase the AUC of diclofenac,
`
`cally active, but
`
`to a much lesser extent
`
`than
`
`diclofenac. The aromatic hydroxylated metabolite
`
`chronic active hepatitis has also been shown to not
`affect the pharmacokinetics of diclofenaelfll
`
`and the conjugated metabolites have been reported
`to be pharmacologically inactive.“3l The metabo-
`lism of dielofenac in. viva and in liver microsomcs
`
`3.6 Pregnancy and Lcictotion
`
`has recently been demonstrated to be similar in six
`
`During
`
`pregnancy,
`
`as with
`
`all NSAlDs,
`
`different cytochrome P450 {CYP) enzyme 20‘? ge-
`notypes,l'°l with no evidence of polymorphism [fig-
`
`diclofenac should he used only for compelling rea-
`
`sons and only in the lowest effective dose, particu-
`
`ure 2).[‘3l
`
`larly in the last
`
`trimester because of the risk of
`
`-'21 200? Adis Data Information sv. All rights reserved.
`
`Clin Drug Invest 200?: 2? (3)
`
`Page 5
`Page 5
`
`

`
`168
`
`Moore
`
`CUOH
`
`OH
`
`Acyl glucuronide 1:
`UG T2 B?
`
`NH
`
` cooHN H
`
`Cl
`
`Cl
`
`Cl
`
`4', 5-Dihydroxy-d iclofenac
`Cl
`
`OH
`
`4'AHydrox~_-Hiiclofenac
`
`COMT
`
`COOH
`
`CYPZCB
`C‘i’F’2C9
`
`C‘r'F'2C9
`
`H
`
`COOH
`
`OH
`
`CUDH
`
`NH
`
`CI
`
`CI
`
`OCH;
`
`OH
`
`4'-H ydroxy-3' -rnethoxy—
`
`diclotenac
`
`NH
`
`Cl
`
`0'
`
`CY P2C9
`
`To
`CYF’2CB.r’1Bf19
`cvpzaa
`CY PSA4
`
`NH
`
`Cl
`
`Cl
`
`Dial Man“
`
`5'-Hydroxy-diclote nae
`
` oooH OH
` COOH
`Ola i :0‘ \.
`
`Cl
`
`Cl
`
`OH
`
`CIH
`
`3 '— Hyd noxy—d lclofenac
`
`DC
`
`Hg:
`
`3'-Hydroxy~4' —metho>:y—
`die lotenac
`
`COOH
`
`N—OH
`i
`CI
`
`Cl-.
`
`N.5-Dihydroxy-dtclofenae
`
`Fig. 2. Blotransformation oi diclofenae. COMT = catechoI—D—methyltransferase; CYP = cytochrome P450; UGT = uricline diphosphate
`Ql uCu1’Or‘lU$\;|l1"al'|SiE:I'a59.
`
`uterine inertia andfor premature closure of the duc-
`
`3.7 Summary
`
`tus arteriosus.'33'
`
`Diclofenac passes into breast milk in very low
`
`quantities when oral doses of 50mg are taken every
`
`8 l‘lU111'$'.[24l The risk to the infant of diclofenac—
`
`The pharmacokincties of diclofenac, including its
`
`potassium salt, are well known. Diclofenac potassi-
`
`um 12.5rng is provided in a rapid—rcleasc formula-
`
`tion, which means that it has a more rapid onset of
`
`related adverse effects should therefore be minimal,
`
`pharniaeodynamic activity. The elimination of
`
`especially with the recommended OTC dosing regi-
`
`men (S75 mg/day). Although in
`
`two studies
`
`diclofenac could not be detected in breast milk, the
`
`diclofenac is complete. At low doses it is unlikely
`
`that other exogenous t"actors such as commonly used
`
`drugs or endogenous factors such as age or impaired
`
`clea1‘ing—organ functions cause any critical changes
`
`presence of diclofenac metabolites in breast milk
`
`in the pharmacokineties of diclofenac. Based on the
`
`has not yet been excluded.”
`
`wide therapeutic experience with dielofenac and
`
`E3 200? Adis Data Informenion BV. All rights reserved.
`
`Clin Drug Invest 200?: 2? (3)
`
`Page 6
`Page 6
`
`

`
`Diclofenac Potassium 125mg Tablets in Mild to Moderate Pain and Fever
`
`169
`
`Table I. Comparison of some characteristic phannacokinetic parameters of non-prescription analgesics and diclofenac
`
`Compound
`
`Half-life {hi
`
`trrlayi (hi
`
`Aspirin iacetylsalicyllc acid)
`Salicylic acid
`
`Ibuprofen {Fli'S)l*5'39l
`
`0.25
`2-33
`15-30”
`1 5—3D”
`
`2-3
`
`1-2
`
`1-2
`
`Naproxen
`
`12-25
`
`2~4l3°-311
`
`0.4-0.8
`
`14.
`Diclofenac potassium
`a
`For low doses of salieylates.
`b Because of saturable kinetics, half-life increases to 15—3t]h.
`CYP : cytochrome 450 enzyme; RIS = racemic {containing equal quantities of Ft{—)— and S{+)—ibuproten}', tmu = time to maximum
`ooncerltration.
`
`Metabolism (e.g. site, metabolites and
`enzymes}
`Liver and other tissue
`
`Excretion
`
`Flenal
`
`Salicylunc acid. salicyl phenolic glucuronicle
`
`he-nal
`
`Hydroxylation, carboxylation (2-hydro>ty-
`ibuprofen and carb-oxy-ibuprofen) followed by
`ccnjugationml formation of Ft(-Hhioesters
`6—O—clesmethylnaproxenl3?l (CYPECQ.
`CYP2C13)
`Liver: CYPECB, CYFECQ, CYP3A4
`
`Flenal
`
`Flenal
`
`Flenal
`
`taking into account
`
`the known pharmacokinetics
`
`ibuprofen lnay represent an additional
`
`lnetabolic
`
`of
`
`the
`
`drug,
`
`low—dose
`
`diclofenac
`
`potassium
`
`load for the organism. Additionally. metabolic in-
`
`pharmaeokinetics seem appropriate for a non-pre-
`
`version may be impaired in hepatic dysfunction,
`
`scription status.
`
`resulting in delayed elimination of ll)LlpI‘L‘ll'CIl.l33l
`
`3.8 Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics of
`Low—Dose Dlclofenac: Potassium with
`
`Established Non-Prescription Analgesics
`
`There
`
`are
`
`relatively
`
`few
`
`nonprescription
`
`analgesics containing chemically defined com-
`
`pounds on the market. Aspirin (acctylsalicylic acid"),
`
`Rapid onset of analgesia is essential in the treat-
`
`ment of acute pain. The observed tnm for diclofenac
`
`is.
`
`in general. shorter than that of naproxen and
`
`similar to that of ibuprofen, indicating that the onset
`
`of the analgesic effect of diclofenac should occur
`
`rapidly, as confirmed by several clinical
`ieS_[s4—3'l]
`
`stud-
`
`paracetamol. ibuprofen and naproxen appear to be
`
`The available OTC analgesics differ markedly in
`
`the most relevant compounds for comparison with
`
`their metabolism. Diclofenac is mctabolised by
`
`diclofenac potassium.
`
`phase 1 hydroxylation and by phase 1] conjugation,
`
`Important comparative pharmacokinctic para-
`
`with the CYP enzyme 2C subfamily (CYP2C9,
`
`meters of diclofenac and other OTC analgesics are
`summarised in table I.l15'-*2]
`
`Diclofenac is a non-chiral compound. Naproxen
`
`CYPECS]
`
`playing
`
`a
`
`key
`
`role. Naproxen
`
`is
`
`metaboliscd to a 6—CI—dcsmcthyl derivative and then
`with
`
`glucuronide. When
`
`racelnic
`
`conjugated
`
`is a stcreoehemically pure drug, of which the S-
`
`ibuprofen is administered to humans. a substantial
`
`enantiomer is available on the market. Ibuprofen is
`
`fraction 60-90%) of the dose of RI:-)-ibuprofen
`
`chiral and the marketed product is racernic, contain-
`
`ing equal quantities of R(—)- and S(+)-ibuprofen.
`
`The active S(+)—enantiomer (eutomer) is capable of
`
`inversion to yield S{+)—
`undergoes metabolic
`ihuprofen.l29'i‘3' However. the degree of this inver-
`sion varies from individual to individual. Moreover,
`
`inhibiting COX at clinically relevant concentrations.
`
`the extent of inversion appears to be reduced when
`
`R(—)—ibuprc-fen is not a COX inhibitor. Even if the
`
`inactive enantiolner [distomer) undergoes metabolic
`
`the racematc is given to patients experiencing acute
`pain.”-"1 The chiral inversion is unidirectional from
`
`inversion to the active cutomcr,
`
`inactive R(—)—
`
`the inactive R{—)— to the active S(+)—enantiomcr.l4Ul
`
`-e 200? Adis Data Information av. All rights reserved.
`
`Clin Drug Invest 200?.‘ 2? E3}
`
`Page 7
`Page 7
`
`

`
`170
`
`Moore
`
`Both isomers are nietabolised in the liver by hydrox-
`
`4. Therapeutic Efficacy
`
`ylation and carboxylation to 2—hydroxyibuprofen
`
`and carboxyibuprofen followed by conjugation.l39J
`
`The Rl[—)-enantiomer of ibuprofen becomes in-
`
`volved in pathways of lipid metabolism by forming
`
`coenzyme A thioesters.l“"-42] The resulting interac-
`
`tion leads to the formation of hybrid triglycerides,
`
`which may impair membrane function or endoge-
`
`nous lipid synthesis.[43l Additionally, hybrid ni-
`
`glycerides result
`
`in depots of slowly eliminated
`
`ibuprofen ttvgp >100 hours}.
`
`The therapeutic efficacy and safety of diclofenac
`
`potassium administered as a single dose (l2.5mg.
`
`25mg). or in multiple doses of 25mg up to 7'5 mg]
`
`day, has been demonstrated in randomised, double-
`
`blind, placebo-cont.rol led trials with active compara-
`
`tors (ibuprofen, paracetamol, aspirin) in established
`
`pain and fever models. These include dental pain
`
`after extraction of impacted third molars, acute he-
`
`nign lower back pain tlumbagol. episodic tension-
`
`type headache, fever and sore throat, cold and influ-
`
`There are also marked differences in the tv_43. The
`
`enza-like symptoms, and menstrual pain arising
`
`apparent tvip of aspirin is approximately l8—-40 min-
`utes.l4“'45l Aspirin is rapidly hydrolysed in the body
`
`from primary dysmenorrhoea. An overview of the
`
`clinical trials and a summary of the outcomes are
`
`to salicylic acid. Correspondingly, the decrease in
`
`presented in table II.
`
`plasma aspirin concentration is associated with a
`
`All the efficacy studies described in this article
`
`rapid increase in salicylic acid concentration.”“' The
`
`included timed evaluations of pain intensity and
`
`average plasma half—life of salicylic acid is about 3
`
`hours.'‘““ Salicylate, but not aspirin itself. exhibits
`
`Michaelis-Menten isaturable) phamtacokinetics. At
`low doses. the elimination is first order and the half-
`
`life remains constant at 2-3 hours. However, at
`
`higher doses, the enzymes become saturated and the
`
`apparent half—|i'fe can increase to l5—3O hours. The
`
`effect of aspirin is therefore prolonged as a result of
`
`irreversible aeetylation of COX and metabolism to
`
`salicylate. Similarly, the half—life for naproxen with
`
`values between [2 and 25 hours is also relatively
`
`long, resulting in prolonged inhibition of gastric
`
`COX-1. Scharf et
`
`al. have hypothesised that
`
`NSAIDs with longer half-live-s are of particular con-
`
`eern as they may be more toxic in the gastrointesti-
`
`nal (Gll tract, particularly in the elderly, and that
`NSAIDS with short half-lives are associated with
`
`lower GI toxicity than NSAIDs with long hall'-
`
`lives.l‘”] This, combined with the low doses used
`
`and the common lack of risk factors. could be a
`
`factor contributing to the excellent GI tolerability of
`
`ibuprofen and diclofenac, which are among the
`NSAIDs with the shortest half-lives.
`
`pain relief or fever reduction over the first 6 hours
`
`after the first dose. In those studies that emphasised
`
`pain relief. the primary outcome for first-dose effl-
`
`cacy was either the pain-relief assessment at a spe-
`
`cific timepoinl or an aggregated total pain relief
`(TOTPAR—ta) outcome, defined as the area under
`
`the pain relief-versus-time curve from hour zero t.o a
`
`fixed post—dosing timepoint. The secondary out-
`
`come. sum of pain intensity difference (SPID-ta], is
`
`defined as the area under the pain—intcnsity dit'fer—
`ence from the baseline-versus-time curve from hour
`
`zero to a fixed post—dosing timepoint.
`
`4.l Dentol Pclin
`
`Dental pain is widely accepted as a validated
`
`model for documenting the efficacy of analgesics.
`
`The efficacy of low doses of diclofenac potassium
`
`against moderate-to-severe pain after the extraction
`
`of impacted third—molar teeth has been evaluated in
`
`several randomised. placebo-controlled studies in-
`
`volving 1259 patients aged l6—75 years (table
`ll).“3‘-“"531 Single-dose, dose-ranging studies con-
`
`ducted with diclofenac potassium 6.25. 12.5 and
`
`-'21 200? Adis Data Information av. All rights reserved.
`
`Clin Drug Invest 200?: 2? (3)
`
`Page 8
`Page 8
`
`

`
`Page 9ao
`
`mum
`
`171
`
`Dielofenac Potassium 125mg Tablets in Mild to Moderate Pain and Fever
`
`
`
`
`
`mama.Em:__cm::.a:oU
`
`93«me.nmiv_-oo_n_
`
`
`
`newone3.2AmmEaan:523E0._I.Cawn«ma.
`
`mmxA._A._nNam2;...an.m.J:_m.n__n_m.J.,m.w_<n_._.O._.an¥.oso
`
`En.Aomm<m¢fim._m>omaEaEn:mm:6an.
`
`mudEa9%
`
`2.0.05Aommamqnewmm:-o_A._oBA.
`
`
`
`mam¥o_o_onm.m_.v_-o29E0.¢.CSm<m<
`
`omm(m...Hmm:523.0.6.-_n-aEm6.,n-m¢Eo+mmv_-oA._o
`
`EmAomm«ma:663eaEmma:mi:5o_n_
`
`2EmmwmEmmix-oemmfi:5em.
`
`8m3.nmm:5eamm¥ou_n_
`
`
`
`
`
`mwmv_.o_u_n_Hm.m_...._.ou_n_com_.5_
`
`:.o_,.._n_Nnowan:Eamm.3A__n_
`
`m.m_.
`
`mmd
`
`mmdEam.m_.
`
`x-o_o__...Acom3...:Emmmv.-o23En.
`
`¥o_u_oAcanan:newmm:5u_n_On_n_
`
`
`
`mwmx-o_2onm.m_.x-ou_mnowan:
`
`com:9Hmm:5en.mmv_-oso
`
`81Acom2.2mar:5o5
`
`_.5_u92v_A__u_n_Hmm:5anEm.EF_m-m<m5+Sqan:
`
`
`
`
`
`m_w.,___au_w_._.._.“.92
`
`
`
`
`
`m_w.E_m.m<n_._.o.__m.n__.n_m
`
`
`
`Em.AanEmx-oanm_w.mm_nos._D5_u_En.
`
`
`
`
`
`ann2-0ea_.._m:m.o_n__n_Eu:1._n_A:On_.n_
`
`
`
`
`
`nm.m_.v_.a_A__n_Hmmv_.oA__n_.m.n__n_m_m.n__A_m_m.n_¢n_._.O._.use3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`“DE.m=mEmnE_m.t<..:mmH:mumQ2”.x-o_o_oue.3.uEEwan.
`
`m.m_.2-0A5BA.
`
`
`
`EA.AWE.3.3v_-oofim_.w_¢n_._..U._.mmmmi:505EQ.3§:mn_
`
`
`
`
`
`8..Amud.m....:_mm:5ea...-m<A:o+mmmmum2...23ENE
`
`
`
`andAcanan:Emmm:-o_o_ammmmmm:5A53.mn_.mm:EmcmEmma.
`
`
`
`canAmud_m.m_.mm.....o23mmmmumz-ou_QE.3.oEE_&n_
`
`
`
`
`
`fim_$mEEmQ.__.:wtr_oomm.m:m__mvu
`
`
`
`
`
`___=o=om.E3.=w_nE._..:.£9.935.“5.3__E.__._an
`
`
`
`EA..m-w_<m._.O._.5-5__._m-n_n:mmv_-o_o_o
`
`new021
`
`
`
`
`
`Anew:2Eum.m_.am2-005£...2mm.EmGEAme.mm?x.o_u_a.3.3.2:Emma
`
`
`
`
`
`o_._o_w_umm.._mn_3.:D._m:w.u_un.w_n_m
`
`
`
`Acow:n__E5m.m_.3.:5u__n_m.m¢.n_._.O._.3%mm;v_.o_u_n__..m_mmn_
`
`
`
`
`
`813.weatEn.
`
`D_n_fi_gm5.5In.EmD_n:mm:.o_A._a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`..8moEoEco=m:_m>m_m.$m_Em._m_n>omoEm_..cmE_.n__umw_E_uucm.___So._.SE9mwouEmE_mw._._.anewxu__.:m
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`m=:mm._ucmm_._m_mm._u_m_.._.H#0bmEE:m”m_._o_Eu_u:_.B::cu-m_._T_m_..a“Omuzuzfixumu_=m_.__fl_DW._.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`H...
`
`wWmmMWHbAmcomAmM
`
`Clin Dlug |rw6S’r 2007: 2}‘ (3)
`
`

`
`Page 10o
`
`romum
`
`Moore
`
`.I_
`
`2_r...
`
`
`
`:2.nx-o_u_a6-.m-a_¢m_m-m§:.Eno
`
`
`
`.museGEit.mo._.___%_D__.._.
`
`E3...2»32
`
`
`
`
`
`.n.Qn_A_3_Esx-o_u_c..n__2._mt<-9.__._m.96...._n_E5a_n_dn:Ba.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`89._mn_mm.N_.ucmmm¥-o_u_DAwmu009.._mn_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8.2.an.nmmdx-%_eoi
`
`2En:2newv_-o_u_nas::2
`
`
`
`.5.Hv_-o_o_nDn_n_
`
`
`
`
`
`can.Aman;.51newm._Em._muE$_.__$5.0.mmVv_-o_u_m
`
`
`
`
`
`mmmx.o_u_mNmmx-_..._o_m,—u:|r_..-:<Eo+.5.m>oEn.mm:-_..._u_n_
`
`
`
`
`
`E._.._.....__maE_o_._....._um:E
`
`__§._5Eflu3%Eu9;
`
`
`
`ucmmfiumummc._m.>m_E.wm__m:
`
`
`
`
`
`:2.uv_-o_o_aB__E__m_m>oEm_w.mm_52can.
`
`
`
`nma.v_-o_..._n_ummv_-o_u_a3.?En.
`
`
`
`Bumooo—.._mn_E0_m__.gw-n__¢_5.mn:mm:.%_o
`
`
`
`ooE.en_can.
`
`
`
`canA:9Em3.295cm5.6a_2u__._n_
`
`
`
`
`
`?;EoEm.mn_Emuzoumm.acmamu
`
`_.5_HV.Em
`
`
`
`
`
`-o_u__Q.8;n:2Enx-2u_aH__._..__.mm_.EI_..m_wL__%5.2mmEn.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`uDSE._om%..9:u.n_.._SusiEuseumu“.E:_mm£...aumc£o_u___uHu_.o_u__n__.§_EmmoBuon.“menum_E_..m._EEmaE2m5.555:mm,_mHo._.:<xfioau___.§_mm_zcu£c._.__ammudad
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`uDEa_§m-_¢_e.__auanHonmumaucan.”_oEmEum._mauin.uemovm_n__._:Eun___.=uE_m.:cmu_4.__._EHu_E_cm_o._q:....=u_._n__Eo:m_.__m>m_mao_mHmmEmE__m9m:_woum__n__=_._Ea__u_xm=
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.3mu_:u_2mm._mmmEo_.u:_.m_.6muEm_.m__E_mmm=mu_u:_n$om.o_=m§$ammEo__v:_A.:o__mo_nmEgamma2mE__nEL.53¢:x2Q:mmczfiE__m_Ema.5E;nx.m¢n_._.O._._m:._o;uE9.mwucm_mt_n_.Em:mE__58EE3nx-n__n_mEwanm_m:_mnum_a::anrm_m:_mnon_E_m::o:ma:U._E__nm.m_.um_:oS_-_ucm_omn2.:a:_§E22Emanma._mu:m._m=_nb_mcmE__:_.3.
`
`
`
`En.um.m_.v_-o_u_oHmm:-o_uEcw6:9mm.EmGEEmm.m_.z-o_o_oEmmn_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_D____._..m=m.ucmon._wt<22.28295mmcmzoHEmena_._..Ev_-o_o_o_uE,3GEem_wmn_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`—uE_.=Eon_u:w.a__._mm
`
`
`
`H05.EtaEmE6:4own52;:-o_uEE8;
`
`
`
`
`
`can.amud.m.m_.mmv_-o_o_a_.:..oU_.:<mewmewv_-oe_aEin.2:Ewan.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_5_mx-o_...E.9:mw-mm52as:2...:N:2En.a$205HEEram.I¢.n_._.O._.HEEmas:z-o_u_ouE,3.uEEgan.
`
`
`
`
`
`x-o_u_a-E.m.$.nFo».m-...Emfin:Q__2n_
`
`
`
`:9.m:n_.8;A3.Enxé_g_aatEa.m>oEuse913;.GE;x-o_u_cas.8.2:Emma.
`
`
`
`
`
`wmo_._ta:mE.=_.u.EmE_.n_mE._u_u._uEan_u_=_.__
`
`
`
`_..__mn_gown._o.so_:m_:oa3:3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.uo__o.:cou-on_mo_m_n_mam>EE:_u-m_fl1__uU_u_.__E.m_n_:ou.umm_EoEE29.53_n2m.3.m
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`>umoE.n.B:o._E:_m>m_m._2.n.EEm_a.aumo_tm..cmE_.m_...._mw_Eau_._E_Eo._.BE.mmou_..._mE_mm;._..625aufim
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ecoo.__aim...
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.:o=mm_Eou:m._Emamaom._.__£_2.mzumummzmn.mu.._m_6_axo_.m£:3:0EmE_am=u.....,_mfi_c_EumEmsmEm__mn_.25.2:9.En_uflmmfiD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`.mmEouSou____umamco
`
`E3 200? Adis Data Informefiom BV. All righis reserved.
`
`Clin Dlug |rw6’3’r 2007: 2}‘ E3}
`
`

`
`Diclofenac Potassium 125mg Tablets in Mild to Moderate Pain and Fever
`
`173
`
`4 _
`
`3 —.
`
`I Diclofenac potassium
`A Paracetamol
`El Placebo
`
`
`
`Meanpainrelief
`
`
`
`Time (h)
`
`Fig. 3. Mean relief ol pain with diclofenac potassium, paracetamol
`or placebo at different
`timepoints following dental extraction in
`study P34.[“31 The pain relief scores in both active groups were
`significantly higher than placebo at all timepolnts (p < 0.01}. At 30
`minutes only, pain relief was significantly greater for paracetamol
`than for dlelofenae potassium (p < -0.01). Pain relief scale is: 0 = no
`relief;
`1 = a little; 2 = some: 3 = a lot; 4 = complete.
`
`25mg evidenced the logarithmic dose-response pro-
`file of diclofenac potassium.[“35°'53l TiInepoint-by-
`
`timepoint comparisons of least square means for
`
`pain relief. and pain-intensity differences for each
`
`treatment group, show a classic dose-proportionality
`
`profile with regularly increasing efficacy and a flat
`
`placebo line.
`
`Over 6 hours a single dose of diclofenac potassi-
`
`um 25mg tended to provide better relief than the two
`
`comparator drugs. aspirin 650mg and ibuprofen
`
`200mg. and the two lower doses of diclofenac potas-
`
`sium 6.25 and l2.5n1g, especially between I and 3
`l'1()l.1t'S.l48‘5O'52l
`
`tion for up to 6 hours (figure 3) and that the flexible
`
`multiplc—dose regimen is suitable for managing pain
`
`over the normal course of 2 days. This study also
`
`demonstrated that after the initial dose and during
`
`re-medication. multiple doses ofdiclofenac pot.assi-
`
`um 125mg, given as one or two tablets as needed,
`
`provided a consistent profile of analgesia similar to
`
`that obtained with paracetamol 100-0mg tablets and
`
`significantly better than placebo.
`
`4.2 Acute Lower Bock Poin
`
`The efficacy of the flexible dosing regimen of
`
`dielofenac potassium l2.5mg in a daily dose of
`
`25—'?5mg versus ibuprofen 2 X 200mg in a daily
`
`dose of 400—l20(lmg or placebo was investigated in
`
`study P40, a 7-day trial in 370 patients with at least
`
`moderately acute lower back pain, such as lumbago
`(table l[).l-lg‘ This study showed that diclofenac po-
`
`tassiurn was at least as effective as ibuprofen, with a
`
`suggestion of superior efficacy based on statistically
`
`significant superiority in a subset of efficacy out-
`
`comes. The primary efficacy outcome for the first
`dose of two tablets was TOTPAR—3 — the time-
`
`weighted sum of the pain relief scores after 3
`
`included
`hours. Secondary first—dose outcomes
`TOTPAR-6, SPID-3 and SPID-6, time to rescue or
`
`re—medication, and the cnd—of—first—dose global effi-
`
`cacy assessment. Diclofenac potassium 2 X |2.5ntg
`
`was significantly superior to placebo on TOTPAR-3
`
`(p = 0.03). Diclofenac potassium was also superior
`
`on all other first—dose outcomes, except for time to
`rescue or re-medication, for which the three treat-
`
`Efficacy was confirmed in the multiple—dose
`study P3493‘ This randomised. double-blind, doub-
`
`ments did not differ. Diclofenac potassium was also
`
`significantly superior to ibuprofen 2 X 200mg on
`
`le-dummy, placebo-controlled. multicentre, paral-
`
`SPlD—?i (p : 0.04). Ibuprofen 2 X 200mg was superi-
`
`lel—group trial compared the efficacy of an initial
`
`or to placebo only on the end-of-first-dose global
`
`dose of diclofenac potassium 25mg up to 75 mg.-‘day
`
`efficacy assessment.
`
`with an initial dose of paracetamol
`
`lf}0(lmg up to
`
`Flexible dosing outcomes in this study included
`
`3000 mgfday and placebo over 2 days. This study
`
`daily and end-ollstudy global efficacy assessments,
`
`showed that an initial dose of diclofenac potassium
`
`time to rescue or re-tnedication. and pain-intensity
`
`25mg effectively relieves pain from dental extrac-
`
`assessment on a visual analogue scale (VAS)
`
`-e 200? Adis Data Information Bv. All rights reserved.
`
`Cliri Drug Invest 200?: 2? (3)
`
`Page 11
`Page 11
`
`

`
`174
`
`Moore
`
`I Diclofenac potassium
`A Paracetamol
`El Placebo
`
`4 _
`
`3 —.
`
`I
`
`l\J
`
`Meanpainrelief
`
`U‘
`
`U
`
`I
`'l
`
`r
`2
`
`r
`3
`
`I
`4
`
`I
`5
`
`I
`5
`
`categories of ‘none’ and ‘a little’ were grouped into
`
`a failure catcgory.[5"l Using suc

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket