throbber
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 72.37.248.4
`On: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:40:19
`
`SAMSUNG ET AL. EXHIBIT 1045
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`
`GROWTH
`IEMPERHURE
`me” C
`new
`975
`
`BACK SIDE MASK
`SID?
`Si N
`254
`
`
`
`
`
`umwuvruCHANGFINCURVHURIno‘cm’):
`
`n~ICKNESSOFTN(RtMLSi()2
`
`(X;
`
`FIG. 2. Sample curvature induced by stresses in thermal SiO, grown in wet
`0, on (1 l I) and ( I00) samples versus SiO, thickness. The line represents
`the curvature introduction expected for an SiO, stress level of 7 X 10'’
`dyn/cm ’.
`
`temperature (time = O) is caused by the ditferences in ther-
`mal expansion between Si and Si02 . The Si,N,, back-mask
`sample in Fig. 1 has less curvature at room temperature and
`is curved in the opposite direction to that of the SiO, back-
`mask samples because the Si,N, on the back is thin and in
`tension while the Si0, on the back of the other two samples
`is thick and in compression. As seen in Fig. 1, after entry into
`the fumaoe, the samples straighten up as they equilibrate
`with the furnace (which takes approximately 5-8 min). If
`there is stress in the growing oxide, the samples continue to
`bend as seen in the 900 °C data, which shows continual bend-
`ing for times greater than 10 min. Note that the 1000 ‘C data
`shows no bending during Si02 growth (times greater than 10
`min, which leads to the conclusion that the SiO, is growing
`stress free at this temperature.
`Data such as that in Fig. 1 were obtained at several
`temperatures around the viscous flow point of 965 “C. Re-
`sults were analyzed as follows to obtain a best estimate for
`AKO , the value of curvature at growth temperature for zero
`Si0Z thickness, rsiol. A plot of raw data such as in Fig. 1
`versus 75“): exhibits an easily identified slope in the data for
`times after about 8 min. The intercept ofthis straight portion
`at zero 1-5.0} is taken as AK0 for that sample. The value of
`AK0 was generally different from zero (flat) because of a
`constant stress in the back mask. The value for AKO was
`subtracted from the data taken after 8 min and the resulting
`data replotted versus SiO2 thickness 1-5,02. Thickness 15,02 as
`a function of time was estimated by measuring the final oxide
`thickness and using published rsioz-vs-time plots for steam
`growth of $02 shifted to match the final thickness-time
`
`9
`
`Appl. Phys. Lett.. Vol. 35. No. 1, 1 July 1979
`
`data point (a typical run at 1000 °c grew 3200 A in 3 1:).
`Results are shown in Fig. 2 for various growth temperatures.
`Note first of all in Fig. 2 that there is a dramatic differ-
`ence in going from 950 to 975 or 1000 ‘C for both the (111)
`and (100) samples. Also note that the results for either back-
`mask choice are essentially the same for a given growth tem-
`perature, thus assuring that the major effects are due to
`stress (or lack of stress) in the growing Si02.
`The results for the Si3N‘ back-mask samples tended to
`level off as rsioz exceeded 600 K. This is not understood at
`present, but the quality of our Si,N,, films and their contin-
`ued masking ability is suspect because their etch rates in
`room-temperature HF are far too high (500 A/min) even
`though the index of refraction (1.97) is consistent with low-
`oxygen-content material. The SiO2 back-mask results at
`growth temperatures of 950 °C and below show that the sam-
`ples continue to curve as long as Si0, continues to grow.
`A line is included in Fig. 2 to indicate the level of stress-
`es seen in the SiO2 during growth. The curvature change AK
`is proportional to the integral of the stress through the oxide
`thickness. If we assume that the oxide stress is constant
`
`through rsio_, AK is proportional to -rsioz and is related to the
`stress in the SiO2 , $5.0, by
`
`AK =
`
`6$sao,7'sio,(1 " Vsi)
`
`.
`
`Est’;
`
`(2)
`
`where rsi is the sample thickness and E5,» and vsi are
`Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio, respectively. Letting ‘
`E5i(l — vsi) ‘ ' = 2.28 X 10" dny/cm 2, the line in Fig. 2 is
`plotted for Ssiol = 7 X 10° dyn/cm 2. This value of stress is
`large compared to the room-temperature stresses of 3 X 10 9
`dyn/cm 2 set up during cooldown 7 by the differences in ther-
`mal expansion for Si and SiO2 . Prediction of the existence of
`stress during growth by examination of the room-tempera-
`ture stresses in our samples after cooldown has been incon-
`clusive because there is apparently some occasional relief or
`compaction of the stressed films during cooldown. More
`work is needed here.
`
`Near discontinuities in the growing oxide, shear stress-
`es will exist in the SiO2 and Si near the Si/SiO2 interface.
`These shear stresses are ofthe order ofthe compressive stress
`in the oxide and are proportional to the integral over T5502 of
`the oxide stress. Since the recently measured 6 critical stress
`for shear flow in Si at 1000 °C is 3.4x 107 dyn/cm 2, it is
`entirely plausible to see plastic deformation of Si beneath
`discontinuities in growing SiO2 layers (near the edges of
`windows, etc.). In other words, the present results show that
`high stresses can exist in our SiO, at growth temperature
`where the Si is mechanically weak.
`The possibility of a tensile stress in the SiO, growing at
`1030 ‘C is seen in Fig. 2. This result is tentative because the
`effect is small and has not been checked yet at higher
`temperature.
`Several runs using dry 02 were attempted. The much
`reduced growth rate of thermal Si02 in dry 02 made the
`experiments more diflicult. Preliminary results suggest that
`the stress levels are much reduced over those seen in Figs. 1
`
`E.P. EerNIsse
`
`9
`
`SAMSUNG ET AL. EXHIBIT 1045
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 72.37.248.4
`On: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:40:19
`
`SAMSUNG ET AL. EXHIBIT 1045
`Page 3 of 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket