throbber
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 49
`571-272-7822 Entered: October 4, 2016
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., and SK HYNIX, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`ELM 3DS INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases1
`IPR2016-00386 (Patent 8,653,672) IPR2016-00387 (Patent 8,841,778)
`IPR2016-00388 (Patent 7,193,239) IPR2016-00389 (Patent 8,035,233)
`IPR2016-00390 (Patent 8,629,542) IPR2016-00391 (Patent 8,796,862)
`IPR2016-00393 (Patent 7,193,239) IPR2016-00394 (Patent 8,410,617)
`IPR2016-00395 (Patent 7,504,732) IPR2016-00687 (Patent 8,928,119)
`IPR2016-00691 (Patent 7,474,004) IPR2016-00708 (Patent 8,907,499)
`IPR2016-00770 (Patent 8,907,499)
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before GLENN J. PERRY, BARBARA A. BENOIT, and
`FRANCES L. IPPOLITO, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BENOIT, Administrative Patent Judge.
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Mr. Andrew B. Grossman
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.10
`
`
`1 We exercise our discretion to issue one order to be entered in each case.
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00386 (Patent 8,653,672)
`IPR2016-00388 (Patent 7,193,239)
`IPR2016-00390 (Patent 8,629,542)
`IPR2016-00393 (Patent 7,193,239)
`IPR2016-00395 (Patent 7,504,732)
`IPR2016-00691 (Patent 7,474,004)
`IPR2016-00770 (Patent 8,907,499)
`
`
`IPR2016-00387 (Patent 8,841,778)
`IPR2016-00389 (Patent 8,035,233)
`IPR2016-00391 (Patent 8,796,862)
`IPR2016-00394 (Patent 8,410,617)
`IPR2016-00687 (Patent 8,928,119)
`IPR2016-00708 (Patent 8,907,499)
`
`Petitioner filed a motion for pro hac vice admission of Mr. Andrew B.
`Grossman. Paper 45.2 The motion was accompanied by a declaration from
`Mr. Grossman in support of the motion. Exhibit 1077. Petitioner represents
`that Patent Owner does not oppose the motion. Paper 45, 1.
`Having reviewed the motion and the declaration of Mr. Grossman, we
`conclude that Mr. Grossman has sufficient qualifications to represent
`Petitioner in this proceeding and that Petitioner has shown good cause for
`Mr. Grossman’s pro hac vice admission. See Unified Patents, Inc. v.
`Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (setting forth the
`requirements for pro hac vice admission) (Paper 7). Mr. Grossman will be
`permitted to appear pro hac vice in this proceeding as back-up counsel only.
`See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`It is:
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for pro hac vice admission of
`Mr. Andrew B. Grossman is granted, and Mr. Grossman is authorized to
`represent Petitioner only as back-up counsel in this proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in this proceeding;
`
`
`2 Representative paper and exhibit numbers refer to IPR2016-00387.
`2
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00386 (Patent 8,653,672)
`IPR2016-00388 (Patent 7,193,239)
`IPR2016-00390 (Patent 8,629,542)
`IPR2016-00393 (Patent 7,193,239)
`IPR2016-00395 (Patent 7,504,732)
`IPR2016-00691 (Patent 7,474,004)
`IPR2016-00770 (Patent 8,907,499)
`
`
`IPR2016-00387 (Patent 8,841,778)
`IPR2016-00389 (Patent 8,035,233)
`IPR2016-00391 (Patent 8,796,862)
`IPR2016-00394 (Patent 8,410,617)
`IPR2016-00687 (Patent 8,928,119)
`IPR2016-00708 (Patent 8,907,499)
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Grossman is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), and
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of
`the Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Grossman is subject to the USPTO’s
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO’s Rules
`of Professional Conduct set forth at 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00387 (Patent 8,841,778)
`IPR2016-00389 (Patent 8,035,233)
`IPR2016-00391 (Patent 8,796,862)
`IPR2016-00394 (Patent 8,410,617)
`IPR2016-00687 (Patent 8,928,119)
`IPR2016-00708 (Patent 8,907,499)
`
`
`
`4
`
`IPR2016-00386 (Patent 8,653,672)
`IPR2016-00388 (Patent 7,193,239)
`IPR2016-00390 (Patent 8,629,542)
`IPR2016-00393 (Patent 7,193,239)
`IPR2016-00395 (Patent 7,504,732)
`IPR2016-00691 (Patent 7,474,004)
`IPR2016-00770 (Patent 8,907,499)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Jason Engel
`Benjamin Weed
`K&L GATES LLP
`jason.engel.PTAB@klgates.com
`benjamin.weed.ptab@klgates.com
`
`Naveen Modi
`Allan Soobert
`Phillip Citroen
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`PH-Samsung-ELM-IPR@paulhastings.com
`allansoobert@paulhastings.com
`phillipcitroen@paulhastings.com
`
`John Kappos
`Xin-YI Zhou
`Brian Cook
`O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
`ptabmicronelm@omm.com
`vzhou@omm.com
`bcook@omm.com
`
`
`
`

`
`IPR2016-00387 (Patent 8,841,778)
`IPR2016-00389 (Patent 8,035,233)
`IPR2016-00391 (Patent 8,796,862)
`IPR2016-00394 (Patent 8,410,617)
`IPR2016-00687 (Patent 8,928,119)
`IPR2016-00708 (Patent 8,907,499)
`
`IPR2016-00386 (Patent 8,653,672)
`IPR2016-00388 (Patent 7,193,239)
`IPR2016-00390 (Patent 8,629,542)
`IPR2016-00393 (Patent 7,193,239)
`IPR2016-00395 (Patent 7,504,732)
`IPR2016-00691 (Patent 7,474,004)
`IPR2016-00770 (Patent 8,907,499)
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Cyrus A. Morton
`Kelsey Thorkelson
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`cmorton@robinskaplan.com
`kthorkelson@robinskaplan.com
`
`William Meunier
`Michael Renaud
`MINTZ, LEVIN, COHEN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`wameunier@mintz.com
`mtrenaud@mintz.com
`
`James Carmichael
`CARMICHAEL IP, PLLC
`jim@carmichaelip.com
`
`
`
`5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket