`
`
`
`I, Harold H. Davis, Jr., do hereby declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the Bar of California (admitted in 2005),
`
`the Bar of Florida (admitted in 1999), the Bar of Maryland (admitted in
`
`1999), the Bar of the District of Colombia (admitted in 2000), the Bar of
`
`Illinois (admitted in 2003), the Bar of Tennessee (admitted in 2005) as well
`
`as the following federal courts:
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`f.
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`i.
`
`j.
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`
`U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
`
`U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
`
`U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
`
`U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
`
`U.S. District Court for the District of the District of Columbia
`
`U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
`
`U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
`
`U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois
`
`U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
`
`2.
`
`I am a partner at K&L Gates LLP. I am an experienced patent litigation
`
`attorney with more than sixteen years of experience. In that time, I have
`
`SAMSUNG ET AL. EXHIBIT 1078
`Samsung et al. v. Elm 3DS Innovations, LLC
`IPR2016-00387
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`served as counsel in numerous patent infringement lawsuits in district courts
`
`across the country, before the International Trade Commission, and at the
`
`Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
`
`3.
`
`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court or
`
`administrative body.
`
`4.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any court or
`
`administrative body denied.
`
`5.
`
`I have had no sanctions or contempt citations imposed against me by any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`6.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and
`
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`7.
`
`I agree to be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth
`
`in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 11.19(a).
`
`8.
`
`I have not previously applied to appear pro hac vice in any other proceeding
`
`before the Board.
`
`9.
`
`I am very familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding, and
`
`particularly with the patent-at-issue in this proceeding, U.S. Patent No.
`
`8,841,778 (“the ’778 patent”).
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`10.
`
`I am currently representing Petitioner SK hynix Inc. in a parallel litigation in
`
`the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Civil Action
`
`No. 14-cv-1432), which involves the ’778 patent.
`
`11. As counsel for Petitioner SK hynix Inc. in the parallel litigation, I have been
`
`actively involved with all aspects of the district court case, including aspects
`
`concerning the invalidity of the ’778 patent.
`
`12.
`
`I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States
`
`of America that the foregoing is true and correct, and that all statements
`
`made of my own knowledge are true and that all statements made on
`
`information and belief are believed to be true. I understand that willful false
`
`statements are punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. See 18 U.S.C.
`
`§ 1001.
`
`
`
`Date: September 30, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Harold H. Davis, Jr.
`Harold H. Davis, Jr.
`4 Embarcadero Center
`Suite 1200
`San Francisco, CA 94111-5994
`Telephone: (415) 249-1008
`Facsimile: (415) 882-8220
`
`
`Page 3 of 3