throbber
Elm Exhibit 2137
`Samsung, Micron, SK hynix v. Elm
`IPR2016-00387
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`,11r1o,:a1 11011 10:11 PM mu 343 am
`
`. NUVELLUS
`
`'
`
`'
`
`Elm!-‘I
`
`Attnrnr-y’: Dqokel No. 008442-028
`(fuxmatly 5l.960.P0.l7d)
`Page 2
`
`1 am cu:-nntly Cl'1i¢f’1'Iub.uicnl Officer of N1:-valluu, a §;oI‘lli.on I hm we
`5.
`sing: 1990.
`'
`'
`.
`6. In 1988 or so. ivuvcuua lnuuétuceu : mm-an Pncvn aeposuiun symn.
`This uyuwm provided for t.l1.I firs: rim: 1 npchanhn III comm! the su-us cf deposited
`films. one RF mum: is high fxequenny. and 1111: other RF neuron in law ftaqunncy.
`
`stress In conxrollad by varying :11: may mtln ohm: hlgh and law Ibquanuy RF-
`suumas. The mail: rule of th: high-fieqlazncy RF is to ganarnte the reactlve in-ecies'a:1d
`
`is Iddid to central thi
`prcwirlu sufficient clock-on and ion dannifisa. Th: lqw
`ion bombaxdment In which ‘I116 IU-blllllfll are uubjwnad. during dspouition.
`Insztnsing ti:
`
`low-nequency power incruses 11:: plasma potential and H1: Imoum of ions following Eh:
`low-fnaquuna.-.y RF finld (<1 MI-I2). Thu xullllfillg low-unargy Ion isnplnntattinn Granting
`
`during deposition causu a chug: in this in|'.ri1:I:ic film siren fzurn tensile to nu:-nprcmivo,
`increases film density, and i1:1uruv:a th: chcmlcal ructiana.
`.
`
`7. Sn-an level meammncms of dielectric film 11;: men spoken of and dapicued
`‘tn '*un.iu- of 1 x 10’ dynuI=n1',.w-Ith 1+" buingnsad In damn 1:-nails anus and -J’
`being usui La demon: compressive II.|:'B6S- Both inlngtr and tlcch-11.‘|1 values may b_= used.
`for cumple;
`
`
`
`E
`
`:
`
`-
`
`'
`
`-
`
`.5 I. 10' dyueslcn‘
`
`-4 :1 10’ dyneucm’
`-3 x 10' aynuicsu‘
`-2 1: 10- dynI:a.'cn1"
`-1 J: 10’. dsrneslnnf
`
`‘
`
`-11.1 x 10* dync5In:n'
`
`0 as 10’ d1'nesIc:n'
`
`0.1 :1 10' dynulem‘
`1 x 10' dyneslcm'
`
`'
`
`2 it 10’ dymsh.-Ira’
`3 x 10‘ dynesI'
`
`I
`
`.
`
`
`
`I
`
`-5
`
`,
`
`_
`
`1
`
`mic:
`
`Elm Exhibit 2137, Page 2
`
`Elm Exhibit 2137, Page 2
`
`

`
`__nr1o«.s'r
`
`‘non 10:15 nu; ans m was
`
`NOVELLUS
`
`I
`
`.
`
`1
`
`'m“
`
`
`
`Attorney‘: Docket No! 003442-928
`I
`(fD_l.'mI=|!1Y 5196U'.POI7d)
`1%.]: 3
`
`8. M‘. Novetlus. I would be approached by qmamcr: having various dlflemm tum
`
`requlnrrnnnltl. Malt ofthele eequixemeen were qufie conventional. Mont cu1ttnrt_'u':r:I
`
`in tensile
`requeslted !ihn.s.haVing II stress of ah-nut. I-1.. Customer! ‘marl mt
`flirnsbeeause Dfflilfl propensity orsuchfllgas no crack. Dielncmc films are case used an
`pnssivatlcn layers. cllcldng at which can mutt in an-ioc'con1a:ninat1un and failure In the
`field.
`
`9.
`
`In 1990, I was appxuached by Glenn Laud? thou: the feasibility of proelucing a
`
`thick dielectric film hull!!! very low tczuflc stress, This was I very unconventional
`requnr. one that. no my knowledge, no cnstcxncr Ind made before.
`
`10. Al: the time Mr. Lcedy read: his request. Nevcllua had completed a
`substantial body of work regmllng sues: centre: or thin man. This war}: suggested in
`
`theory that. by cent:-nliing deposition parameters (principally lite ratio of high frequency
`
`RF energy to low frequency RF energy). flux at-can could be controlled anywhere along I
`line passing through me and mending from about -5 to +3. Atunhed is a page from
`Nevel1us's Process Guide for Silicon Nitride. The figure at the bottom or fit: page shew’:
`the theeretiell curve for street Vexnu peteunl-fie of low-frequency powfl-1'. 362611!!! Wit}!
`
`I.'|8l.I points corrclgonding Infilml Ictullly prcthlced. Infrtctlcc. however, the lowest
`tensile stress rum produced at Nnvcllus Print to Ieceivln; Mr. Iaeedy's request was.
`according to my recnllcctiun. about +1.
`'
`I
`11. Based cnrny uplflernca. Ituponded to Mr. LeedYthI.tI'lhG1.l§htthat
`Novetlua euuld pmduec at film. um would meet his zequirctnents. Under m} direction. an
`engineer then undertuok a series of expefimenu. conducted over a. period of several whys.
`
`eunermretlng that indeed a Ihlflk low stress wniilu dielectric fi!_n: could he produced.
`having I. ntntfl ls-nrelbtebour 0.1:»: less-. murder of magnitude en:-mme Iowutlun
`tensile mm: that had previously been produced at Ncvcllus.
`12.
`I have reviewed U.S. Patent 4.702.936 to Mad: et 11-. From the limited
`
`infonmtion presented in the patent. I helievetltnt it is lmponlblc to any with my degree
`
`or certainty what the stress level at films produced In cceurdance with the tracking: or
`
`ruin-:
`
`Elm Exhibit 2137, Page 3
`
`Elm Exhibit 2137, Page 3
`
`

`
`’i
`
`
`
`_.11/10:91
`
`'
`'
`'
`HUN 10:15 mix «as an ans
`
`‘
`NOVELLUS
`
`v
`
`Blues
`
`Auomey-s Docket No, ousacz-nzs
`(fomlcrly 51960. P0176)
`,
`Page 1
`
`I
`
`ma panenl. would be. For eximpic. no mcntion I: made in Maori: er :1. or the reactor
`Iprfilfilllt. an impcnam plums; Variublu, Tia
`pwclsl Vlfinbles in the Ncwcllut
`process and in produce law mus tcuil: dialectic fan: for Mr. Lady included _
`
`tempcmuzc. p:_eI5'lli'¢. high fiequmny I3 pawn-. low fiequcncy RF power. and flow
`ratc: of vnrimu chemical ec.miitue.n:a (Spcclfimtian. page 21).
`13. Both amulslry aha ncunuaniany In llnpochnt ml: in dmminin; fllzn
`chlllcmrlsllca. Sllnlilritiu in chcmlsiry (or cw:n__ld.cn:1:a.i nhcmisliy) simply uaanui bu
`used to pradict film similarity span: from mnsidnrafiann of activation. The aim:
`chcmiuuy coupled with ditfarcnt activation can produce cntinly different mrultn.
`
`In tin
`
`can of Mad: at al.. thc ‘UV activation process m1pioycd'diffcrs grcatly from the dual
`RF activation przuccls uacd at Novclllil to Dmduce films (or Mr. Lccdy. To draw an
`analogy, the mac ingrcdicnu. flour and watcr my be used In ml: a pizza. or may be
`used no make a cdrc.
`~
`
`14. Bascd on my experience. 1 do believe IMI mm produocd in znccxtlance with
`an leaching: uf Mud: at :1. would have zcnsllcsucns.
`I-Inwcvcr. M.II::lu at .1. provides
`no muchanism for contzulling the mum lcvcl. i.c.. no mechanism akin In varying Eh:
`'
`
`ratioofhighfzcqucnqtcluwf¢‘1"¥=l|€:!¢ncrgyuinthac-seofr11eNovalJusay|tcrn.
`The ability to PIOIIIGB I low tcnsilc um: layer rclics on the ability to control atfcaa with
`In independent mechlnim or "lm'n'h.“ Nu mdnknnh is p:I:.Ir:n.t‘in.Maeds. :1 ll.
`
`:5. Silicon nitride meammuy goes down a: rclnllvcly high levels of trzmile am:
`(c.g., +1}1n accuzdance win: both thezmal depa-man -ms ugh frrqunncy 1-Ecvn.
`'
`Ptixthcrmnrc. other ‘work using aimfla: chmnimy and UV activation as Mzéln ct II. has
`
`reluliacd in flinn hlvinz strnilcs of about _-I-1. Ncic, fin: cnmplc. Ncgcyoahi. e1 31..
`“Residual Sins: of 1 Sl,..N,:I-I Pilmn Prcpucd by Afterglow Plum: Ghanaian! Vapor
`Deposition Techniq-uc", Jpn. J. Jppl. rm, von. 31. pp. L857-1.869 (1992). a copy of
`which is attachcd l:_n1'Ito.
`16. Th»: umdculxnsd declare: fuxlhet. that all statements made hcrcin at his own
`
`all slaiemznia made an infianuation and belief ax: believed to
`knuwlcdgc are ‘true. Ind
`bu tl.'I.1I:: Hind further that than ntztemnnn Well: nude with the kxmwlédge that willful false
`
`am":
`
`-a_
`
`Elm Exhibit 2137, Page 4
`
`Elm Exhibit 2137, Page 4
`
`

`
`3 _
`
`H
`
`__________
`
`. ’ _.__ -
`
`—- -—---—--—--'--- -'
`
`.11/1fl_._v(9'l’
`
`_IlON 10:19 FAI I08_ 34.! 3418-
`
`NDVELLUS
`
`AI:mmIy'n Do-chit No. 008442-032!
`(fillflfirly 5-1960.PD17d?
`Page 5
`
`1
`
`summons Ind tho Iih so made In punishahla by flan at Ixnpr-luamncnt. onboth. under
`Sfltfidn 1001 at’ This 18 of the Unitad sum Code. and that such willful fill! Ittbczuenn
`
`mayjeopanlin: ma valldil-‘Jr of the ippllnfinn. or any pamrgt issuing rh:mn_1.
`
`BM 1; [am]
`
`AIILIIH
`
`mm-
`
`I305.)
`
`'.-.-.7
`
`Elm Exhibit 2137, Page 5
`
`Elm Exhibit 2137, Page 5

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket