throbber
United States Patent [19]
`Cox et al.
`
`[73] Assignee:
`
`[54] REACTIVE ION ETCH CHEMISTRY FOR
`PROVIDING DEEP VERTICAL TRENCHES
`IN SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATES
`[75] Inventors: Randy D. Cox, Round Rock, Tex.;
`Arthur B. Israel, Colchester; Edward
`H. Payne, Essex Junction, both of
`Vt.
`International Business Machines
`Corporation, Armonk, N.Y.
`[21] Appl. No.: 917,131
`[22] Filed:
`Oct. 9, 1986
`[51] Int. Cl." ....................... B44C 1/22; H01L 21/308
`[52] U.S. Cl. .................................... 156/643; 156/646;
`156/648; 156/651; 156/659.1; 156/662;
`252/79.2
`[58] Field of Search ............... 156/643, 646, 648, 649,
`156/651, 659.1, 662; 252/79.1, 79.2; 29/576 W
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`4,222,792 9/1980 Lever et al. ......................... 148/1.5
`4,417,947 11/1983 Pan ...................................... 156/643
`4,450,042 5/1984 Purdes ................................. 156/643
`
`[56]
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45]. Date of Patent:
`
`4,717,448
`Jan. 5, 1988
`
`
`
`4,475,982 10/1984 Lai et al. ............................. 156/643
`4,533,430 8/1985 Bower ................................. 156/643
`4,561,907 12/1985 Raicu .............................. 156/643 X
`4,569,718 2/1986 Butherus et al. .................... 156/643
`4,589,952 5/1986 Behringer et al. ....
`... 156/646 X
`4,613,400 9/1986 Tam et al. ........................... 156/643
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`P. M. Schaible et al., “Reactive Ion Etching of Silicon,”
`IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 22, No. 5, Oct.
`1979, p. 1819.
`Primary Examiner—S. Leon Bashore
`Assistant Examiner—Andrew J. Anderson
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Mark F. Chadurjian
`[57]
`ABSTRACT
`A process for forming deep (>6pm) trenches in a sili
`con substrate. The substrate is etched through a silicon
`oxide mask in a plasma having 75%–86% HCl,
`9%–16% O2, and 1%-8% BC13. The resulting trenches
`have substantially vertical sidewalls and rounded bot
`tom surfaces. The plasma etch is performed at high
`power and low pressure, so that it achieves a high as
`pect ratio at a minimum etch bias.
`18 Claims, No Drawings
`
`Page 1 of 5
`
`SAMSUNG ET AL. EXHIBIT 1087
`Samsung et al. v. Elm 3DS Innovations, LLC
`IPR2016-00387
`
`

`

`1
`
`REACTIVE ION ETCH CHEMISTRY FOR
`PROVIDING DEEP VERTICAL TRENCHES IN
`SEMICONDUCTOR SUBSTRATES
`
`10
`
`4,717,448
`2
`passivated the sidewalls to increase the verticality of the
`etch.
`U.S. Pat. 4,475,982 (issued 10/9/84 to Lai et al and
`assigned to the assignee of the present invention) relates
`to etching trenches through differentially-doped re
`gions in a silicon substrate. Specifically, a CCl2/argon
`RIE is used to etch lightly-doped regions, and a
`CCl2F2/oxygen RIE is used to etch more heavily
`doped regions.
`U.S. Pat. 4,569,718 (issued 2/11/86 to Butherus et al
`and assigned to AT&T) teaches the use of a BC13/Cl2
`etch chemistry to etch gallium arsenide.
`As shown in the above art, the use of chlorine-based
`chemistries to etch trenches in silicon is known. How
`ever, it would be advantageous to have a particular
`chlorine-based etch chemistry that presents a maximum
`aspect ratio and a minimum etch bias for deep trenches
`formed in a silicon substrate.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`It is thus an object of the invention to provide a
`plasma etch chemistry that will produce deep trenches
`in silicon substrates.
`It is thus another object of the invention to provide a
`chlorine-based etch chemistry in which deep trenches
`may be formed in silicon substrates, the trenches having
`substantially vertical sidewalls.
`It is yet another aspect of the present invention to
`provide a chlorine-based trench etch process that has a
`maximized aspect ratio at a minimum etch bias.
`The foregoing and other objects of the invention are
`realized by a chlorine-based trench etch process that
`provides a maximum aspect ratio at a minimum etch
`bias. The etch chemistry comprises a combination of
`oxygen, hydrogen chloride, and boron trichloride. It
`has been found that the sidewalls of the etched trenches
`are substantially vertical and the bottoms of the etched
`trenches are rounded when the gas mixture includes
`more than 70% HCl in the presence of a small amount
`of BC13.
`DESCRIPTION OF THE BEST MODE FOR
`CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
`The etch process of the present invention is carried
`out on a p-- type, 3100× oriented silicon substrate
`that has a 2.5 p.m thick p— type epitaxial layer disposed
`thereon. A layer of silicon oxide is formed on the epitax
`ial layer. The silicon oxide layer could be formed by any
`one of a number of known techniques (e.g., oxidation of
`the wafer by exposure to steam or dry O2 at high tem
`perature, chemical vapor deposition, etc). Whichever
`way the oxide layer is formed, its thickness should be in
`the range of 300 nm. The reasons for this critical thick
`ness will be explained below.
`A photosensitive polymer is then applied to the sur
`face of the silicon oxide layer. Any one of a number of
`known photoresists could be used here. The photoresist
`is patterned to expose selected areas of the silicon oxide
`layer and then the exposed portions of the silicon oxide
`layer are removed to expose underlaying portions of the
`silicon substrate. It is preferred that dry etch techniques
`be used to pattern the oxide layer, so as to form aper
`tures therein having vertical profiles. Any etch chemis
`try (or combination of etch chemistries) that would etch
`the oxide layer in an anisotropic mode could be used. In
`the invention, a two-step etch process is used. In the
`first step, a CF4 RIE (400 V d.c. bias, 20 mT pressure,
`
`TECHNICAL FIELD
`The invention relates to a specific chemistry for ef
`fecting deep trenches having substantially vertical side
`walls in semiconductor substrates.
`BACKGROUND ART
`In the formation of integrated circuits, it is often
`necessary to etch an aperture in a silicon substrate. In
`the past this substrate etch was used to define apertures
`15
`which were filled with dielectric in order to provide
`isolation between adjacent devices. There was no par
`ticular criticality associated with the slope of the side
`walls of these apertures. Moreover, these apertures
`were not particularly deep (e.g., 2–3 p.m.).
`In semiconductor memory technology, the trend
`20
`toward packing more memory cells into a given chip
`area has led to the development of “three dimensional”
`or “trench” memory cells. In these cells, the charge
`plate of the storage capacitor is formed by one or more
`polysilicon layers and one or more dielectric layers that
`25
`are coated within a deep (e.g., 5–6 pm) trench. The
`sidewalls of these deep trenches must be substantially
`vertical (i.e., have a slight positive taper x, where
`88° 33.90°) in order to (a) minimize the amount of
`chip space consumed by the trench, and (b) present a
`30
`topology that can be reliably coated with conductive
`and insulative films. Any etch process that is used to
`form deep trenches in silicon must provide a maximum
`“aspect ratio” (i.e., the vertical dimension of the trench
`should be at a maximum as compared to the horizontal
`35
`dimension) while minimizing “etch bias” (i.e., the hori
`zontal dimension of the trench should not be apprecia
`bly greater than the horizontal dimension of an aperture
`formed in a masking layer through which the trench is
`etched).
`An article by Schaible et al, entitled “Reactive Ion
`Etching of Silicon,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin,
`Vol. 22, No. 5, October 1979 p. 1819, discloses the gen
`eral idea of forming a trench in silicon by utilizing a
`Cl2/Ar reactive ion etch (“RIE”) chemistry. By adding
`45
`CCl4 to the etch gas, a larger amount of Cl2 can be used
`to increase the silicon etch rate without causing lateral
`etching of an n-type subcollector region.
`U.S. Pat. 4,222,792 (issued 9/16/80 to Lever et al and
`assigned to the assignee of the present invention) dis
`50
`closes a process of forming a trench isolation region.
`The patent lists various techniques of forming a trench
`in a silicon substrate, namely Cl2/Ar or CCl4/Ar based
`RIE, fluorine based RIE such as CF4, sputter etching or
`ion milling.
`55
`U.S. Pat. 4,417,947 (issued 11/29/83 to Pan and as
`signed to Signetics Corp.) relates to a process of con
`trolling the slope of apertures formed in silicon by vary
`ing the oxygen content of a CCl4/O2 RIE. An aniso
`tropic profile is achieved when there is no oxygen pres
`60
`ent.
`U.S. Pat. 4,450,042 (issued 5/22/84 to Purdes and
`assigned to Texas Instruments) discloses a BCl3/Br2
`plasma chemistry for anisotropic etching of silicon and
`silicon-containing compounds such as silicide. In gen
`65
`eral, the etch rate increased with increasing He (inert
`ion bombardment) in the presence of 8% BCl3. The
`addition of bromine was found to be critical in that it
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`4,717,448
`4
`3
`100 SCCM gas flow) is used to pattern the silicon oxide
`tion. It is omitted from the other etch processes listed in
`Table 1 purely for the sake of clarity. .
`layer, and then a brief O2 RIE (800 W power, 35 mT
`In order to understand the sequence of test runs lead
`pressure, 50 SCCM gas flow) is used to remove any
`ing up to the invention, a description will now be made
`residual polymers that may have redeposited from the
`of the myriad of problems that were presented by the
`photoresist.
`initial BC13/Cl2 trench etch. The sidewalls of the
`It should be noted that of the above-described pro
`trenches were “irregular” in that they did not have a
`cess parameters, the thickness of the silicon oxide layer
`uniform slope. In general, the slope of the sidewalls
`is of primary importance. As will be explained below,
`varied as a function of depth. The sidewalls should have
`the trench etch includes a small percentage of oxygen.
`The oxygen will attack the photoresist above the silicon
`a constant near-vertical slope that does not vary as a
`oxide layer, substantially removing it during the trench
`function of depth. At least some of the trenches exhib
`etch. Therefore, although the etch rate ratio of silicon
`ited a “dovetail” trench bottom, wherein the bottom of
`the trench had a convex, semi-hemispherical shape.
`oxide to silicon is in the order of 50:1 during the trench
`This convex shape is the inverse of the concave,
`etch, the silicon oxide layer must be thick enough so
`that it is not totally eroded during the trench, etch.
`rounded trench bottom that is desired in order to maxi
`mize trench filling by eliminating void formation in the
`Therefore, in order to form a 6.5 pm deep trench, the
`filler material. That is, a dovetailed trench bottom
`silicon oxide layer should not be less than 100 nm. In
`practice, a 300 nm layer is used.
`would be difficult to reliably cover with layers to be
`A series of trial runs were attempted leading up to the
`subsequently coated within the trench. Some of the
`trench etch chemistry of the invention. The process
`trenches exhibited “black silicon” formation on the
`20
`conditions for significant ones of these trial runs are
`trench bottom. “Black silicon” results when a reaction
`byproduct such as boron oxide is redeposited on the
`reproduced in Table 1 below. The specifics of the trial
`etched surface. These small particles form miniature
`runs will be discussed with reference to Table 1, as
`etch masks in that they will not be removed in the
`follows:
`
`15
`
`Ar—O2 D.C. Bias
`O2
`HCl
`Cl2
`BC13
`Trial (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM) (SCCM)
`(Volts)
`I
`50
`O
`0
`0
`0
`–200
`l
`15
`50
`0
`0
`0
`–350
`
`Pressure
`(mTorr) Results
`20
`10
`
`44
`44
`
`15
`6
`
`50
`40
`
`()
`0
`
`O
`0
`
`15
`0
`
`–350
`*300
`
`10
`100
`
`-
`
`63
`
`91
`
`6
`
`6
`
`6
`102
`6
`*:::
`*power in watts
`*final etch conditions
`
`30
`
`0
`
`()
`0
`
`35
`
`75
`
`75
`100
`
`15
`
`15
`
`15
`15
`
`0.
`
`0
`
`0
`0
`
`-350
`
`–475
`
`–400
`—450
`
`10
`
`10
`
`10
`10
`
`irregular sidewall profiles;
`dovetailing at trench bottom;
`formation of black silicon;
`nonuniformity across wafer.
`
`uniformly sloping sidewalls;
`elimination of dovetailing;
`formation of less black silicon;
`elimination of nonuniformity
`across wafer; necking;
`rounded trench bottom.
`straight sidewalls; trenching;
`rounded trench bottom; bowing.
`vertical, straight sidewalls;
`rounded trench bottom.
`
`50
`
`TRIAL 1
`Initially, a combination of BCl3/Cl2 was used to etch
`trenches in silicon. The trenches produced during this
`initial phase were characterized by “irregular” sidewall
`profiles, “dovetail” bottoms, “black silicon,” and nonu
`niformity across the wafer. Each of these problems will
`be described in more detail below. The BC13/Cl2 etch
`was preceded by a brief BCl3 etch at high pressure (20
`mT) and low power (–200 V d.c. bias). This initial etch
`acts as a chamber conditioner. After etching the oxide
`layer to expose portions of the substrate, some oxide
`may form on the silicon surface to be etched. At the
`same time, after the etch chamber is purged there may
`be some residual contaminants (e.g. water) present. The
`initial BCl3 etch will remove any oxides from the silicon
`substrate, while also gettering any contaminants present
`in the chamber. While this process step is shown sepa
`rately as the first step in Trial 1, it is to be understood
`65
`that this same initial BCl3 etch precedes all of the trial
`etch steps shown in Table 1. That is, this initial etch is
`used in conjunction with the etch process of the inven
`
`55
`
`trench etch chemistry. Therefore, silicon regions be
`neath these particles will not be etched, resulting in a
`roughened topography. This roughened surface will
`not reflect incident light, such that the trench bottom
`will appear to be black when viewed through an optical
`monitor. Finally, all of the tested wafers exhibited non
`uniform etch characteristics as a function of position.
`The trenches formed in the center of the wafer had a
`wide, dovetailed trench bottom, while those formed at
`the edges of the wafer had sidewalls that came together
`to form a narrow tapered trench bottom.
`For various reasons, each of the above four problems
`must be eliminated from the trench etch process. The
`subsequent runs were specifically addressed at over
`coming these problems.
`TRIAL 44
`The first breakthrough occurred at Trial 44, which
`resulted in uniform trench sidewall profiles. Leading up
`to this, some additional gas components were studied.
`Adding 20% oxygen in argon to the BCl3 and Cl2 etch
`gases resulted in a 15% faster etch rate, but also resulted
`in heavy black silicon. Replacing BCl3 with HCl gas in
`
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`

`4,717,448
`
`5
`the main etch step doubled the silicon etch rate. In Trial
`44, a second step with BCI3 and C12 at high pressure (100
`mTorr) and 300 Watts was added, along with the new
`gas mixture (HCI, C12, and Ar/O2), to make a trench
`with slightly sloping sidewalls and the desired rounded
`bottom. Non-uniform etch profiles across the wafer
`were eliminated. There was, however, some narrowing
`or “necking” of the trench sidewall near the silicon-si1i-
`con oxide interface. Some roughness at the bottom
`resulting from black silicon formation was still present
`in the trench profiles. Although the profile was begin-
`ning to look more uniform, the trench could not be
`refilled satisfactorily without voids. Something would
`have to be done to avoid necking and to eliminate black
`silicon.
`
`TRIAL 63
`
`Several changes were made from Trial 44 leading up
`to Trial 63. Pure oxygen replaced the argon/oxygen gas
`mixture of Trial 44. The second step in Trial 44 was
`eliminated. Finally, a small amount of BCl3 was added.
`In Trial 63, the necking problem observed in Trial 44
`was substantially eliminated. Also, the addition of BCI3
`and the deletion of argon seemed to combine to elimi-
`nate black silicon formation. The only remaining prob-
`lem was some “trenching” that was observed at the
`bottoms of the trenches. This term refers to an etch
`profile in which a small portion of an otherwise planar
`etched surface is etched deeper into the material. In
`other words, a small, spiked space extends downward
`from either end of the bottom of the trench. It was
`subsequently found that trenching could be eliminated
`by increasing the d.c. bias; however, this led to a “bow-
`ing” in the trench sidewalls. The term “bowing” refers
`to a trench profile in which the trench sidewalls have a
`concave shape, or are bowed outward.
`TRIAL 92
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`6
`hydrofluoric (BHF) wet etchant. It was found that this
`eliminated bowing, such that the resulting trenches had
`vertical, straight sidewalls and a rounded bottom.
`Moreover, by removing this thick oxide layer, it was
`found that the applied power could be reduced from
`-475 V to -400 V without a reoccurrence of the
`trenching problem.
`Using the Trial 102 conditions as a base, a series of
`experiments were then undertaken to perceive how the
`process parameters could be varied while achieving the
`desired trench profile. For example, as would be ex-
`pected, increasing the applied power increases the sili-
`con etch rate. However, further experiments confirmed
`that at -400 V, some dovetailing (i.e., a small degree of
`trenching) resulted in some of the trenches. At a power
`greater than -475 V, the etch rate increases without
`affecting the etched profile (i.e.,
`trenching is elimi-
`nated). A power of -450 V was selected in order to
`eliminate trenching while also keeping the applied bias
`as low as possible. With regard to pressure, when the
`applied pressure was decreased to 5 mT, the etch rate
`decreased by 29% without affecting the etched profile.
`At 20 mT, the process could not be sustained because
`the power requirement exceeded the maximum RF of
`the tool.
`Varying the gas flows produced intriguing results. By
`raising the HCl flow rate from 75 SCCM to 100 SCCM,
`the etch rate increases by 4% without adversely affect-
`ing the etched profiles. If the HCl flow is dropped to 50
`SCCM, long trench spikes form (i.e., grossly exagger-
`ated black silicon toughening). If the HCl flow is in-
`creased to 125 SCCM, the sidewalls of the trenches
`become somewhat bowed. Raising the oxygen flow by
`5 SCCM has no apparent effect on trench profiles or
`etch rate, but it does create black silicon in the large
`open areas of the pattern. Conversely, a 5 SCCM lower
`oxygen flow destroys the trench profile, leaving huge
`silicon spikes.
`A particularly intriguing result was achieved by
`varying the BC13 supply rate. When BCl3 was elimi-
`nated from the process, no trench was formed. That is,
`without BCl3, apertures of only 1-2 pm were formed,
`having irregular, spiked profiles. When the BCl3 flow
`rate was raised from 6 SCCM to 10 SCCM, dovetailing
`was introduced at the bottom of the trench. These re-
`sults tend to indicate that the main function of BCI3 is to
`remove oxides as they form on the trench bottom while
`allowing boron oxides to form on the trench sidewalls
`in order to produce a near anisotropic profile at a mini-
`mum etch bias.
`Therefore, the process conditions would appear to be
`variable within the following ranges:
`
`Between Trials 63 and 91, the d.c. bias was incremen-
`tally raised by increasing the magnitude of the anode-
`cathode d.c. bias differential, and the gas flows were
`varied. In general, as the d.c. bias was raised above
`—-350 V, the trenching problem was reduced and even-
`tually eliminated at -475 V. However, at this applied
`voltage the bowing problem became more severe. This
`problem was addressed by decreasing the C12 flow and
`increasing the HCl flow. In Trial 91, the C12 flow was
`reduced to zero and the HCl flow was increased to 75
`SCCM. Surprisingly, it was only when the C12 flow was
`eliminated that the bowing problem was substantially
`eliminated. The only remaining problem was a residual
`amount of necking.
`
`TRIAL. 102
`
`In the trials after Trial 91, different modifications
`were made in an attempt to eliminate necking. At Trial
`98, it was noted that some residue from the oxide layer
`above the trench may have deposited on the upper
`surfaces of the trench to induce the observed necking
`phenomena. In the experimental wafers upon which the
`trench etch had been carried out, the thick oxide layer
`had been left in place after the trench had been etched.
`It is believed that at the latter stages of the etch, by-pro-
`ducts of the silicon oxide removed during the etch may
`have redeposited on the upper portions of the trench
`sidewalls. Due to this trench residue problem, after
`Trial 98 the thick oxide layer was removed immediately
`after the trench etch by exposing the wafer to a buffered
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`
`BCI3
`--1 < X
`SCCM < 10
`HCl
`50 < Y
`SCCM < 125
`O2
`10 < Z
`SCCM < 20
`Bias
`400 < A
`Volts < '.’
`
`~10 < BPressure mTorr < 20
`
`
`With the etch process parameters being controlled
`within the above ranges (and optimized as indicated in
`the last line of Table 1), the silicon trench oetch has” the
`following attributes. Approximately 1000 A—l500 A of
`the silicon oxide layer is removed during the trench
`etch. Moreover, experiments showed that if a 1500 A
`oxide mask is used, dovetailing is produced at the bot-
`tom of the trench. Therefore, it appears that the oxide
`
`65
`
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`

`5
`
`10
`
`4,717,448
`7
`8
`mask should be at least on the order of 2000 Å in thick
`treating the substrate in a plasma reactor having a
`ness. The etch bias achieved by the process of the pres
`plasma comprising more than 70% hydrogen chlo
`ent invention averages roughly less than 0.025 p.m,
`ride, oxygen, and approximately 1%–10% boron
`which is extremely small. The aspect ratio achieved by
`trichloride.
`the process of the present invention is approximately 8:1
`8. The process as recited in claim 7, wherein said
`to 15:1, typically about 9:1.
`plasma comprises 75%–86% HCl, 9%–16% O2, and
`Accordingly, the present invention provides a trench
`1%—BC13.
`etch process in which deep trenches are formed in
`9. The process as recited in claim 8, wherein said
`monocrystalline silicon substrates. The trenches are
`reactor has a bias at not less than —400 volts and a
`characterized by sidewalls having a substantially verti
`pressure of not less than 10 mTorr during said treatment
`step.
`cal slope and rounded trench bottoms. The trench etch
`10. The process as recited in claim 7, wherein said
`exhibits a high aspect ratio and a minimum of etch bias.
`masking layer is not totally eroded during said treat
`It would appear that the small amount of BCl3 is of
`ment step.
`particular importance in the etch chemistry of the in
`15
`11. The process as recited in claim 10, wherein said
`vention. Other compounds based on a carbon, boron, or
`masking layer has an etch rate ratio of 1:50 with respect
`silicon base atom linked to a plurality of higher halogen
`to the silicon substrate in said plasma.
`atoms (e.g. chlorine, bromine, etc.) should perform the
`12. The process as recited in claim 11, wherein said
`functions of BCl3 in the etch chemistry of the invention.
`masking layer is comprised of silicon oxide.
`The term “higher halogens” refer to halogens other
`20
`13. A process for etching deep trenches in a silicon
`than hydrogen or fluorine. A fluorine-containing com
`substrate, said trenches having substantially vertical
`pound would have a low silicon-to-silicon oxide etch
`sidewalls and a rounded bottom surfaces, comprising
`rate ratio, causing substantial mask erosion and disconti
`the steps of:
`nuities in the trench profiles. More particularly, carbon
`forming a masking layer on the substrate;
`chloride compounds such as carbon tetrachloride
`depositing and patterning a photolithographic mate
`25
`(CCl4) would seem to be of use in the present invention.
`rial on said masking material, so as to expose se
`However, BCl3 is preferred, in that it posesses opti
`lected area of said masking material;
`mized oxide etch and impurity gettering properties that
`etching said selected areas of said masking material
`are of particular importance to the present invention.
`through said photolithographic material, so as to
`It is to be understood that various modifications can
`form apertures in said masking material that expose
`30
`be made to the present teachings, without departing
`selected areas of the substrate;
`from the spirit and scope of the present invention as
`exposing said selected areas of the substrate to a first
`recited in the several claims appended hereto.
`plasma etchant that removes residual surface ox
`We claim:
`ides and getter impurities; and
`1. A process for etching portions of a monocrystalline
`35
`exposing said selected areas of the substrate to a sec
`silicon material so as to form trenches having sidewalls
`ond plasma etchant comprising more than 70%
`and bottoms therein, comprising the step of treating the
`hydrogen chloride, oxygen, and approximately
`material in a reactor having a gaseous plasma comprised
`1%–10% boron trichloride.
`of more than 70% hydrogen chloride, oxygen, and an
`14. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein said
`amount of boron trichloride sufficient to remove oxides
`first plasma etchant comprises boron trichloride.
`40
`formed during said etching process from bottoms of
`15. A process for etching trenches at least 6 pum deep
`said trenches without substantially removing oxides
`into a surface of a silicon substrate, the trenches having
`formed during said etching process from sidewalls of
`substantially vertical sidewalls and rounded bottom
`said trenches.
`surfaces, comprising the steps of
`2. The process as recited in claim 1, wherein said
`forming a masking material on the substrate that ex
`45
`poses selected areas thereof;
`plasma is comprised of 75%–86% HCl, 9%–16% O2,
`and 1%-8% BC13.
`etching said selected areas in a first boron trichloride
`plasma for not more than five minutes, in order to
`3. The process as recited in claim 2, wherein said
`remove residual oxides and getter impurities; and
`reactor is biased at a voltage of at least —400 volts
`during said treatment step.
`etching said selected areas in a second plasma having
`a gas flow of at least approximately 75% hydrogen
`4. The process as recited in claim 3, wherein said
`chloride, at least approximately 9% oxygen, and at
`reactor is biased at a voltage within the range of —450
`least approximately 1% boron trichloride.
`to —475 volts during said treatment step.
`16. The process as recited in claim 15, wherein said
`5. The process as recited in claim 2, wherein said
`55
`plasma has a gas flow of 100 SCCM HCl, 15 SCCM O2,
`reactor pressure is within the range of 5 to 20 mTorr
`and 6 SCCM BC13.
`during said treatment step.
`17. The process as recited in claim 16, wherein said
`6. The process as recited in claim 5, wherein said
`second plasma is generated in a reactor having a bias of
`reactor pressure is 10 mTorr during said treatment step.
`—450 volts and a pressure of 10 mTorr.
`7. A process for etching trenches in a silicon sub
`60
`18. The process as recited in claim 15, wherein said
`strate, comprising the steps of:
`first plasma has a gas flow of approximately 50 SCCM
`forming a masking layer on the substrate so as to
`BC13, said first plasma being generated in a reactor
`expose portions of the substrate in which the
`having a bias of –200 volts and a pressure of 20 mTorr.
`trenches are to be formed; and
`
`# * * * *
`
`50
`
`65
`
`Page 5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket