throbber
.) 1991 Oxford University Press
`
`Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 19, No. 9 2471
`
`Polymerase chain reaction facilitates the cloning, CDR-
`grafting, and rapid expression of a murine monoclonal
`antibody directed against the CD18 component of
`leukocyte integrins
`
`Bruce L.Daugherty*, Julie A.DeMartino, Ming-Fan Law, Douglas W.Kawka1, Irwin l.Singer1 and
`George E.Mark
`Departments of Cellular and Molecular Biology and 1Biochemical and Molecular Pathology,
`Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA
`
`Received November 12, 1990; Revised and Accepted March 25, 1991
`
`ABSTRACT
`Two novel approaches of recombinant PCR technology
`were employed to graft the complementarity
`determining regions from a murine monoclonal
`antibody (mAb) onto human antibody frameworks. One
`approach relied on the availability of cloned human
`variable region templates, whereas the other strategy
`was dependent only on human variable region protein
`sequence data. The transient expression of
`recombinant humanized antibody was driven by the
`adenovirus major late promoter and was detected 48
`hrs post-transfection into non-lymphoid mammalian
`cells. The application of these new approaches enables
`the expression of a recombinant humanized antibody
`just 6 weeks after initiating the cDNA cloning of the
`murine mAb.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`The immunogenicity of murine-derived monoclonal antibodies
`(mAb) precludes the therapeutic use of these antibodies (1) in
`chronic or recurrent human diseases, such as inflammation or
`cancer. To minimize the unwanted human anti-mouse immune
`response, chimeric Abs were engineered which combined light
`and heavy chain variable (VL, VH) regions of murine origin and
`constant (C) regions from human sequences (2,3). Subsequently,
`Winter and colleagues (4) postulated that a 'humanized' version
`of a murine-derived mAb might reduce further the foreign
`character of the therapeutic Ab so as to be less immunogenic.
`A humanized Ab is one in which only the antigen-recognition
`sites or CDRs (complementarity-determining regions whose
`sequences are hypervariable, and thus antigen-specific, relative
`to the rest of the V regions) are of non-human origin, whereas
`all framework (FR) and C regions are products of human genes.
`In the construction of humanized Abs, several groups (4-7) have
`employed strategies requiring annealing, extension and ligation
`of many long synthetic oligos to graft human immunoglobulin
`
`* To whom correspondence should be addressed
`
`(Ig) VL, VH containing rodent CDRs. In addition, once a
`suitable humanized Ab is identified and expressed, considerable
`time is required for drug selection and expansion of transfected
`clones prior to analysis of recombinant Ig.
`We have devised a novel, rapid and effective means of
`substituting murine CDRs for their human counterparts through
`using overlapping polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragments
`(8-13). Variations of this method are applicable to CDR-grafting
`regardless of the availability of human Ig V region clones. The
`grafted V regions are interchangeable in our expression vectors
`in cassette-like fashion. In addition, we have developed a transient
`expression assay in non-lymphoid mammalian cells which allows
`detection of recombinant human Abs (by ELISA) within 48 hours
`post transfection. Our system enables rapid expression for testing
`the folding, pairing assembly, secretion and resultant activity of
`intact recombinant humanized Abs.
`
`MATERIALS & METHODS
`Oligodeoxynucleotide synthesis
`Oligos were synthesized on an Applied Biosystems 381A DNA
`synthesizer or Milligen Cyclone, removed from the resin by
`treatment with concentrated NH40H followed by desalting on
`a Pharmacia NAP-S column (for oligos <40 bases in length)
`with H20 elution or by the use of an OPC column (Applied
`Biosystems) eluting with 20% acetonitrile (for oligos >40 bases
`in length).
`cDNA cloning
`Two micrograms of total cellular RNA isolated (14) from 108
`murine 1B4 (IgG2Ax) myeloma cells (15) were reverse-
`transcribed for 30 min at 42°C using 200 units of Moloney MuLV
`reverse transcriptase (RT;BRL) and 10 pmol of the C region
`complementary strand primers representing either VL (5'-
`TCTCAAGCTTTGGTGGCAAGAT(AG)GATACAGTTGG-
`TGCAGC-3') or VH (5'-TCTCAAGCTTACCGATGG(AG)G-
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1037, pg 911
`
`

`
`2472 Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 19, No. 9
`
`CTGTTGTTTTGGC-3') chain in 20 ,1l of a buffer containing
`50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgC12, 10 mM
`DTT, and 20 units of RNAsin (Pharmacia). The RT was heat-
`inactivated at 95'C for 5 min and to each reaction was added
`50 pmol of each of the paired primers (C region complementary-
`strand primers listed above plus FRI primers for the kappa chain:
`[5 '-TCTCGGATCCGA(CT)AT(CT)GTG(AC)T(CG)ACCC-
`AG-3']; or the IgG2A heavy chain: [5'-TTCTGGATCCG(CG-
`)AGGT(CGT)AAGCTGGTG(CG)AGTC(AT)GG-3')], 2.5 units
`of Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer Cetus) in 100 1l of PCR
`buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCI, 1.5 mM
`MgC12, 0.01 % (w/v) gelatin, 200P4M each dNTP). PCR was
`performed for 45 cycles (2', 94°C; 2', 55°C; 2', 72°C) followed
`by gel purification. The resulting 400 bp PCR product (see Figure
`1) was phosphorylated, subcloned into the blunt-ended (SmaI cut)
`vector pSP72 (Promega) and sequenced using Sequenase®
`(United States Biochemical Corp.)
`CDR grafting
`CDR grafting utilizing PCR recombination was accomplished by
`synthesizing eight oligos (4 primer pairs RI-R6, SI, S2) [See
`Figure 2. The appropriate primer pair (50 pmol of each) was
`combined with 10 ng of plasmid DNA representing the human
`FR (obtained from Winter and colleagues)(5), and 2.5 units of
`Taq DNA polymerase in 100 11 of PCR buffer. These primers
`directed PCR for 25 cycles (cycle periods, as above). The
`products of the four reactions were purified by agarose gel
`electrophoresis and electroelution, and 10 ng of each of the
`purified products were combined with terminal primers Al and
`A2 (50 pmol of each) and 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase
`in 100 /.l of PCR buffer and amplified for 25 cycles. CDR
`grafting via long oligos and PCR recombination (see Figure 3)
`was accomplished by adding 1 pmol of each of 4 long l00mers
`(G1-G4) together with 50 pmol terminal primers A3 and A4 and
`2.5 units Taq DNA polymerase in 100 1l of PCR buffer and
`amplified for 25 cycles. The combined 400 bp fragment was
`purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and electroelution. In
`parallel, two DNA fragments representing amino-terminal
`sequences encoding a 5' untranslated sequence and the signal
`peptide and carboxy-terminal sequences encoding FR 4, splice
`donor, and a 5'-intronic sequence between V and C regions were
`used for PCR with primer pairs S1, G5 and S2, G6 (G5 and
`G6 contain an 18 base overlapping sequence between GI and
`G4 respectively). PCR was performed with 50 pmol each primer,
`10 ng plasmid DNA containing both the signal and intronic
`sequences, 2.5 units of Taq polymerase in 100 Al of PCR buffer
`for 25 cycles and the product purified as above. These two DNA
`fragments (10 ng of each) were combined with 10 ng of the
`amplified 1B4 CDR-grafted VH region, 50 pmol terminal
`primers Al and A2, and 2.5 units of Taq polymerase in 100 ,l
`PCR buffer and amplified for 25 cycles.
`Heavy chain expression vector construction
`The vectors used for the expression of both H- and L-chain genes
`were derived from the pD5 eukaryotic expression vector (16)
`which contains the origin of adenovirus replication (ori), the SV40
`enhancer, the adenovirus major late promoter (MLP), the
`adenovirus 2 tripartite leader, a 5' splice donor from the
`adenovirus third leader and a 3' splice acceptor derived from
`an Ig locus, a multiple cloning site (containing the sites BamHI,
`SpeL, Sacd, NheI, Clal, NdeI, and NotI), and the SV40 late
`polyadenylation signal.
`
`The adenovirus ori was removed by EcoRI and KpnI digestion
`and replaced by two fragments representing the NeoR selectable
`marker gene (17) derived from plasmid pCMVIE-AK1-DHFR
`(18) as an EcoRI/BamHI 1.8 Kbp fragment and the Ig H chain
`enhancer sequence (19) following digestion with BglII and KpnI.
`The Ig H chain enhancer fragment was obtained as a 300 bp
`amplified fragment using PCR applied to human genomic DNA
`as template, the 2 primers: (5'-TTTTAGATCTGTCGACAG-
`ATGGCCGATCAGAACCAG-3' and 5 '-TTGGTCGACGGT-
`ACCAATACATTTTAGAAGTCGAT-3') and standard
`procedures described above. The resultant expression vector was
`found to lack a small portion of the TK promoter responsible
`for the transcription of the NeoR gene. The promoter was
`reconstituted by insertion into the EcoRI site of a 140 bp PCR-
`amplified fragment derived from pCMVIE-AK1-DHFR using the
`following primers: 5'-TATAGAATTCGGTACCCTTCATCC-
`CCGTGGCCCG-3' and 5 '-TGCGTGTTCGAATTCGCC-3'.
`This resulted in the Neo-selectable vector and was designated
`pD5/IgH-En/Neo. The 1B4 CDR-grafted VH region PCR
`product was digested with BglIH and BamHI, purified, cloned
`into pD5/IgH-En/Neo (BamHI cut) and subjected to DNA
`sequence analysis to determine orientation and verify the sequence
`of the reconstructed V region. The appending of the human IgG4
`(hIgG4) C region to the variable region was performed as follows.
`Plasmid pAT84 (20) containing the human genomic IgG4 C
`region as a 6.7 Kbp HindIll fragment was used as template DNA
`to amplify a 1.8 Kbp IgG4 fragment containing only the exons
`encoding CHI, CH2 and CH3 and the introns separating them.
`PCR was performed with the following primers: 5'-ATTTGG-
`ATCCTCTAGACATCGCGGATAGACAAGAAC-3' and
`5 '-AATAATGCGGCCGCATCGATGAGCTCAAGTATGTA-
`GACGGGGTACG-3'. Following digestion with BamHI and NotI
`(contained on the 5' and 3'-primers, respectively), the IgG4
`fragment was cloned into the BamHI and NotI sites of pD5/IgH-
`En/Neo containing the grafted VH region. The resulting plasmid
`designated pD5/IgH-En/Neo/VH/Human Cy4 (Figure 4) encodes
`an entire Ig H chain.
`Light chain expression vector construction
`The 1B4 CDR-grafted VL region PCR product was digested
`with HindIII and XbaI, purified from an agarose gel and
`subcloned into these same sites of vector pSP72 (Promega) which
`contained the human kappa CL region (21), obtained as follows.
`DNA (lg) purified from a human B cell line (GM01018A;
`NIGMS Human Genetic Mutant Cell Repository, Institute for
`Medical Research, Camden, NJ 08103) was used as a template
`with primers (5'-TCTCGGATCCTCTAGAAGAATGGCTG-
`CAAAGAGC-3' and 5'-TCTCGCTAGCGGATCCTTGCAG-
`AGGATGATAGGG-3') to PCR amplify a 920 bp fragment
`containing the splice acceptor for the human kappa CL domain,
`the exon and a portion of its 3'-untranslated region. The PCR
`product was purified by agarose gel electrophoresis, digested with
`BamH1, and cloned into BamH 1-digested pSP72. The
`pSP72-based intermediate vector containing both the 1B4 grafted
`VL region and the human CL region was digested with Spel and
`Clal resulting in a 1.5 Kbp fragment (containing the CDR-grafted
`variable and human constant region of the kappa L chain) and
`purified by agarose gel electrophoresis.
`The Neo-selectable vector (pD5/IgH-En/Neo) for H chain
`expression was converted into one expressing the hygromycin
`B (Hyg B) selectable marker for L chain expression as follows:
`The NeoR cassette was removed by digestion first with EcoRI
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1037, pg 912
`
`

`
`followed by DNA polymerase-directed fill in of the 5' overhang,
`then subsequent SalI digestion. The Hyg B expression cassette
`(1.9 Kbp BamHl fragment) containing the TK promoter and TK
`polyadenylation signal flanking the Hyg B gene from plasmid
`pLG90 (22) was removed from the plasmid pAL2 (Albert Lenny,
`personal communication) by BamHI digestion and subcloned into
`the BamHI site of the vector pSP72. The Hyg B cassette was
`removed from pSP72/Hyg B by digestion with SmaI and SalI
`and subcloned into the expression vector linearized as described
`above. This resulted in the Hyg B-selectable vector and was
`designated pDS/IgH-En/Hyg B. The vector was digested with
`Spel and Clal, purified and ligated to the 1.5 Kbp SpeI/ClaI L
`chain fragment purified from above. The resulting plasmid
`designated pD5/IgH-En/Hyg B/Vx/Human Cx (Figure 4)
`encoded an entire Ig kappa L chain.
`Expression and assay of recombinant antibody
`Expression plasmids encoding the 1B4 CDR-grafted H and L
`chain were purified through CsCl gradients. The plasmids were
`co-transfected (10,tg of each) into human 293 cells and monkey
`COS-7 and CV1P cells (2.5 x 106 cells in 100 mm plates) by
`standard calcium phosphate precipitation methods (23,24). The
`culture supernatants were assayed 48 hrs post-transfection by a
`sandwich ELISA described as follows: Immulon-2 (Dynatech
`Labs.) 96-well plates were coated overnight with a 5 14g/mL
`solution of mouse anti-human Cx mAb (cat. # MC009, The
`Binding Site, Inc., San Diego, CA) in 0.1 M NaHCO3 buffer
`(pH 8.2) at 4°C, and blocked with 1 % bovine serum albumin
`(BSA) in 0.1M NaHCO3 for lh at 25°C. After this and all
`subsequent steps, washing was performed with phosphate
`buffered saline (PBS). The wells then were incubated with culture
`supernatants containing recombinant humanized 1B4
`IgG4-antibody, or with predetermined quantities of hIgG4
`purified by protein A Sepharose (Pharmacia Fine Chemicals)
`chromatography from hIgG4 myeloma serum (cat. # BP026,
`The Binding Site, Inc.) All samples were diluted in PBS
`containing 0.05% (w/v) Tween-20. 100-FL aliquots were
`incubated for lh at 37°C in triplicate, and standard calibration
`curves were constructed using hIgG4 concentrations of 10-100
`
`Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 19, No. 9 2473
`
`ng/mL. Bound and fully assembled hIgG4 (either native or
`humanized IgG) were detected with 100-/AL aliquots of a 1:500
`dilution of mouse anti-hIgG4 Fc mAb conjugated to alkaline
`phosphatase (cat #05-3822, Zymed Laboratories, Inc., South
`San Francisco, CA) in 0.1 M Tris, 0.15 M NaCl ph 7.5
`containing 1 % (w/v) BSA. After incubation for lh at 37°C and
`subsequent washing, the quantities of bound conjugate were
`detected by incubating the wells with a lmg/mL solution of p-
`nitrophenyl phosphate in 0. IM 2,2' amino-methyl-propanediol
`buffer, pH 10.3, for 30 min at 25°C and measuring the
`adsorbance at 405 nm with a UV Max plate reader (Molecular
`Devices).
`
`RESULTS
`cDNA cloning of an anti-CD18 mAb
`The VH and VL regions of murine 1B4 anti-CD18 mAb (15)
`were cloned using PCR and was similar to the approach taken
`by other groups (26,27).
`Analysis of the murine 1B4
`immunoglobulin with an isotyping ELISA kit (ScreenType,
`Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN) indicated it is comprised
`of an IgG2A H chain and a kappa L chain (15). The 5' primers
`for PCR were chosen from conserved N-terminal FRI kappa and
`IgG2A V region sequences (28). The H chain 5' primer was
`24-fold degenerate and the L chain 5' primer 16-fold (Figure
`1). Both 3' PCR primers were chosen from conserved regions
`of either CHI or CL, each being 2-fold degenerate. Agarose gel
`analysis (Figure 1) of the PCR products of the VH and VL
`regions clearly indicates fragments migrating at approximately
`400 bp as was predicted from the chosen primers. These PCR
`products were subcloned and sequenced and the CDR and FR
`regions were delineated based on the
`locations of the
`hypervariable CDR domains in available sequenced V genes (28).
`Grafting of murine anti-CD18 mAb CDRs onto human V
`region FRs
`Once the murine FR and CDRs had been identified, two general
`approaches were devised to graft these CDRs onto human V
`region FRs. The first approach uses a rearranged genomic DNA
`
`PCR /
`
`NH2
`
`VL
`
`CDR1
`
`M 1 2 3 4 5 6
`
`COOH
`
`Figure 1. Schematic of the coding sequence for an antibody molecule depicting the position where PCR primers were chosen to clone the anti-CD18 VH and VL
`regions. Arrow indicates size of fragments on the agarose gel depicted on the right after RNA/PCR with primers shown (see text). CDR: complementarity-determining
`region; FR: Framework region; V: variable region; C: constant region; L: light chain; H: heavy chain; D: diversity; J: joining; NH2: amino termiinus; COOH:
`carboxyl terminus; -S-S-: disulfide bridge; lanes 1-4, VH RT/PCR products; lanes 5-6, VL RT/PCR products; M: X HindIH, pBR322 MspI.
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1037, pg 913
`
`

`
`2474 Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 19, No. 9
`
`U~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-eU
`
`Figure 2. Strategy for CDR-grafting utilizing PCR recombination. Primer pairs SI-Ri, R2-R3, R4-R5, and R6-S2 generate 4 PCR products in round 1 as shown
`in the figure and lanes 1-4 on the agarose gel depicted on the right. The 4 fragments are combined and PCR amplified with external amplifiers Al and A2 in
`round 2 (see text). The arrow pointing to the band in lane 5 depicts a murine CDR-grafted/human L chain FR of 600 bp. RE: restriction endonuclease sites; M:
`X HindIII, (f X174 HaeIII.
`
`.~~ -
`
`m
`
`Figure 3. Strategy for CDR-grafting utilizing long oligos and PCR recombination. In round 1 long oligos GI, G2, G3, G4 and short termninal primers A3 and A4
`generate the PCR product as shown in the figure and lane 1 on the agarose gel depicted on the right. In parallel, signal peptide .(primers Si1 and G5) and intron
`(primers G6 and S2) PCR products are generated as shown (lanes 2 and 3, respectively). The 3 fragments are combined and PCR amplified with external amplifiers
`Al and A2 in round 2 (see text). The arrow pointing to the band in lane 4 depicts a CDR-graftedlheavy chain FR of 850 bp.
`
`clone (containing intact VDJ for H chain, VJ for L chain, each
`flanked by signal peptide and intron, and V-C intron sequences)
`of a human V region as template for PCR. Both FRs contained
`a leader sequence and 3' intronic sequences. The grafting of
`murine CDRs onto a human V region FR or so-called 'CDR
`grafting via PCR Recombination' is shown in Figure 2. Eight
`representing the primers
`oligo primers were synthesized,
`necessary to generate four DNA fragments by PCR amplification.
`Each internal primer (Rl-R6) contains a sequence that anneals
`to the beginning or end of each human FR plus some or all of
`the murine 1B4 CDR sequence to be grafted. The murine CDR
`sequences do not anneal to the template and effectively hang off
`the human FRs as shown. The dotted lines indicate an 18 base
`complementary sequence between primers. Four DNA fragments
`generated in the first round of PCR by the appropriate primer
`pairs of sizes 314, 97, 134, and 113 bp (Figure 2, Lanes 1-4)
`were recombined and amplified in a second round of PCR using
`external amplifiers Al and A2. These primers anneal to a
`complementary sequence of 18 bases (chosen at random) present
`on primers Si and S2, their subsequent extensions will exclude
`amplification of the original V region cDNA template in favor
`of the CDR grafted recombinant, resulting in a PCR-amplified
`600-bp DNA fragment. As depicted in figure 2 (Lane 5), a DNA
`fragment encoding a fully grafted murine CDR/human L chain
`FR was generated, demonstrating the success of this novel
`technique.
`
`Often the protein sequence of antibodies is available (ie, from
`protein databases) when DNA clones encoding human FRs are
`not. Therefore, a second approach was devised which uses long
`synthetic oligos in conjunction with PCR recombination to
`produce a fully grafted (humanized) human FR/murine CDR V
`region. Codons for murine 1B4 H chain CDRs and the human
`H chain V region FR were built into the design. The 4 long oligos
`(100 bases in length) each contained complementary ends of 18
`bases (Figure 3) which, during PCR using external amplifiers
`A3 and A4, result in the formation and subsequent amplification
`of the combined sequences of a 400-bp DNA fragment (Figure
`3, Lane 1). This grafted sequence is combined with PCR products
`encoding the signal peptide and splice donor (225 bp, Figure 3,
`Lane 2) and intronic sequences (230 bp, Figure 3, Lane 3) in
`a second round of PCR recombination using external amplifiers
`Al and A2, resulting in a PCR-amplified 850-bp DNA fragment
`(Figure 3, Lane 4). Although three other minor PCR-amplified
`DNA fragments were generated in this round, they were not as
`highly resolved by agarose gel eletrophoresis and were not of
`the predicted size. The major DNA fragment encodes a fully
`grafted murine CDR/human H chain FR thereby definitively
`demonstrating
`a second successful
`application of PCR
`recombination in CDR grafting.
`The fully grafted 1B4 CDR/human H- and L-chain FR-
`encoding DNAs generated by the two approaches were subcloned
`and sequenced to determine the accuracy of PCR recombination.
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1037, pg 914
`
`

`
`EcoRI EcoRI
`
`Bho,HI
`
`pD5/IgH-Enhaner/Neo/
`CDR-grafted 1 B4-VH/
`Human C74 (8743 bp)
`
`i
`
`anH
`CDR-rafted I U-Vd
`I IHI
`xb.l
`X
`Human Cc (7650 bp)
`S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~W
`
`ia41
`
`Spel~~~~~~~~~X
`a
`
`Figure 4. Vectors used for L and H chain Ig gene expression. IgH-En:
`Immunoglobulin heavy chain enhancer; SV40: SV40 origin and enhancer;
`MLP+L: Adenovirus major late promoter and tripartite leader; p(A): SV40 late
`polyadenylation signal; ori: pBR322 origin of replication; Amp: ampicillin
`resistance gene; tk: herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter; Neo:
`neomycin (G418) resistance gene; Hyg B: hygromycin B resistance gene: lB4-VH:
`CDR-grafted/H chain FR; 1B4-Vx: CDRy-grafted/L chain FR; Human C-y4:
`human gamma-4 C region; Human Cx: human kappa C region.
`
`Table 1. Expression level of recombinant antibodies
`
`Cell Line
`
`293
`COS-7
`CV1-P
`
`N=2
`
`ng/mL
`
`385 ±438
`82
`1.2
`50±3.9
`
`The Taq polymerase was found to be error prone during PCR
`recombination. Indeed, many clones lacked a completely intact
`open reading frame (ORF). For expediting the selection process
`of clones with intact ORFs, we screened clones by sequencing
`with a single dideoxy termination lane (A track) alone. In one
`case, we were able to quickly eliminate 18/31 prospective clones
`using this simple screening method. The lack of fidelity of the
`polymerase has been addressed in
`the context of our
`recombination strategy, and improvements on the method have
`been found which greatly diminish the number of undesirable
`clones (manuscript in preparation).
`Expression and activity of recombinant CDR-grafted Ig genes
`The vectors for IgG expression driven by the adenovirus MLP
`and tripartite leader are depicted in Figure 4. Both L and H chain
`expression vectors are identical, except that the L chain vector
`carries the Hyg BR gene and the H chain vector the NeoR gene.
`Transfections for transient expression were performed by co-
`transfection of equal amounts of each plasmid into three primate
`kidney cell lines; human 293 cells and monkey COS-7 and CV1-P
`cells. The culture supernatants were assayed 48 hours post-
`transfection by a trapping ELISA that specifically measures
`secreted human kappa L chain linked to a human IgG4 H chain.
`As shown in Table 1, recombinant IgG4x antibodies were
`synthesized by all three cell lines. Human 293 cells expressed
`the highest transient level while the 2 monkey cell lines expressed
`significantly lower levels and this was not suprising since human
`293 cells constitutively express the adenoviral EIA protein (29)
`which stimulates transcription directed from the adenovirus major
`late promoter (30).
`In preliminary binding experiments, medium from transiently
`transfected 293 cultures containing fully-grafted humanized 1B4
`
`Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 19, No. 9 2475
`
`Table 2. Comparative effects of unlabeled fully-grafted humanized 1B4 versus
`murine 1B4 on the binding of 125I-murine 1B4 to stimulated human
`polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs)
`
`Molarity IgG Added
`
`Quantity of 125I-Murine 1B4 Bound (CPM)
`Humanized 1B4
`Native Murine 1B4
`
`1 x 10- 12
`1x 10-0
`I x 10-9
`5 x 10-9
`
`1941
`1761
`858
`460
`
`2211
`1697
`783
`99
`
`Purified murine 1B4 was radiolabeled with 125I to a specific activity of 17 uCi/ug
`using chloramine-T. PMNs were isolated and activated with phorbol myristate
`acetate as previously described (25). Aliquots of PMNs were incubated in
`1.8 x 10-11 M 1251-murine 1B4 in the presence of various concentrations of either
`fully grafted humanized 1B4, or unlabeled murine 1B4, and the quantity of 1251_
`murine 1B4 bound to the cells determined as described (25). For humanized 1B4,
`various dilutions of conditioned medium from 293 cultures transfected 48hr
`previously with the plasmids encoding the fully grafted 1B4 were used to compete
`with 125I -1B4 binding to PMNs. The concentration of humanized 1B4 present
`in this medium was determined by ELISA as described in materials and methods.
`
`was observed to compete with the binding of 125I-murine 1B4
`to CD18-containing receptors on stimulated human polymorpho-
`nuclear leukocytes (Table 2). The level of competition was very
`similar to that observed when unlabeled native 1B4 was used as
`the competitor. Similar results were obtained with CV1-P
`transfected cultures, while media from mock transfected cells or
`purified human IgG4 were completely uninhibitory (data not
`shown).
`
`DISCUSSION
`In this report, we have demonstrated novel adaptations of PCR
`to the successful cloning, humanization, and expression of a
`murine mAb directed against the CD18 component of leukocyte
`integrins (15). Notably, PCR has enabled us to expediently carry
`out the process of cDNA cloning of murine Ig V regions, CDR-
`grafting onto human FRs, and expression as measured by ELISA
`of a fully assembled recombinant human antibody in as little as
`six weeks. The novel technical approaches we have taken enable
`a considerable time and cost savings as compared to more
`traditional methods. In addition, the preliminary competitive
`binding experiments described here also suggest that the
`humanized CDR-grafted 1B4 molecule has an avidity for CD18
`at the surface of activated PMNs nearly comparable to that of
`the native murine 1B4 mAb. The choice of particular human VL
`and VH region FRs used in the humanization of the murine 1B4
`mAb play a critical role in the outcome of the humanization and
`will be reported elsewhere.
`It must be emphasized that the techniques we describe
`necessitated a substantial amount of DNA sequencing in order
`to distinguish those clones that contained an intact ORF from
`those containing insertions, deletions, or substitutions. Initially,
`the method of CDR-grafting using DNA templates for PCR was
`much more successful for producing clones that contained intact
`ORFs than the synthetic long oligo method. Indeed, the majority
`of the clones derived from the latter approach had significant
`deletions of greater than 6 bp, as well as numerous point
`mutations. Retrospectively, upon sequence analysis using a dyad
`symmetry computer program (Intelligenetics)
`ascertain
`to
`predicted regions of stable secondary structure, it was noted that
`the particular sequences subject to deletion gave hairpin loops
`with AG values of -13 to -26 Kcal/mol. Furthermore, the stem-
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1037, pg 915
`
`

`
`2476 Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 19, No. 9
`
`loops predicted in the sequence by the symmetry program closely
`approximated the region of observed deletions in size and
`location. Subsequently, the codon choice was altered in this region
`of the long oligonucleotides. This resulted in a decrease in the
`predicted AG values and a reduction in the frequency of deletions
`during PCR recombination was observed in the product. In
`addition, a decrease in cycle number has also resulted in an
`increase in fidelity and a reduction in the number of deletions.
`Other parameters (i.e., cycle time, temperature, etc.) are being
`investigated actively. Although we do not know the upper limit
`of either the length or the number of fragments for which PCR
`recombination will be practical, we have been successful at
`combining up to 5 fragments and up to a total of approximately
`1700 bp. PCR recombination need not be limited to CDR
`grafting, but will lend itself to a variety of other applications such
`as domain shuffling, domain editing, construction of hybrid
`molecules, etc. Thus, it is a general method to insert specific
`new sequences into other molecules.
`We have generated expression vectors which enable us to
`exchange CDR-grafted FR regions as a single casette. This
`affords us the opportunity to combine a variety of human. FRs
`with identically grafted murine CDR regions, and thus to explore
`the effect of the FR regions on the avidities of a particular human
`recombinant antibody. In this way we can test the hypothesis that
`the recipient FRs for CDR-grafting are generic, ie, any FR region
`is capable of supporting all CDR loops. Likewise, we can easily,
`rapidly and systematically introduce amino acid changes in the
`CDR or FR regions as part of a structure-function analysis of
`antibody/antigen interaction.
`Our rapid transient expression system in monolayer culture has
`served a two-fold purpose. Firstly, due to the high frequency
`of deletions during PCR recombination, it provides a rapid screen
`that allows us to ascertain whether or not the CDR-grafted
`recombinant contains an intact ORF. Secondly, upon expression,
`the activity (avidity) of the recombinant antibody can be quickly
`determined and evaluated.
`It is hopeful that CDR-grafting of the murine V-regions would
`reduce the immunogenicity of the mAb in the context of the
`human immune system. Experiments performed in mice (31)
`suggest that this would indeed be the case, in that a significant
`antigenic response was produced against the foreign V-region
`in a chimeric antibody. Although it is beyond the scope of this
`paper, it will be necessary to produce sufficient quantities of the
`recombinant humanized anti-CD18 mAb for clinical evaluation
`in humans. The establishment of stable mammalian expressor
`cell lines is currently in progress and will subsequently be
`followed by scale-up production. Ideally, the reduction in
`immunogenicity would result in increased serum half-life of the
`therapeutic mAb requiring reduced dosage to achieve efficacy.
`Furthermore, it might enable repeated administration of the
`recombinant humanized mAb for longer time periods.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
`The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge the expert technical
`assistance of Susan Zavodny. They also thank Dr. John A.
`Schmidt and Dr. Alan R. Williamson for valuable suggestions
`and discussions, Dr. Ronald W. Ellis for critical review of the
`manuscript and Susan Pols for manuscript preparation.
`
`REFERENCES
`1. Houghton, A.N., Mintzer, D., Cordon-Cardo, C., Welt, S., Fliegel, B.,
`Vadhan, S., Carswell, E., Melamed, M.R., Oettgen, H.F. and Old, L.J.
`(1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 1242-1246.
`2. Morrison, S.L., Johnson, M.J., Herzenberg, L.A. and Oi, V.T. (1984) Proc.
`Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 6851-6855.
`3. LoBuglio, A.F., Wheeler, R.H., Trang, J., Haynes, A., Rogers, K., Harvey,
`E.B., Sun, L., Ghrayeb, J. and Khazaeli, M.B. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad.
`Sci. USA 86: 4220-4224.
`4. Jones, P.T., Dear, P.H., Foote, J., Neuberger, M.S. and Winter, G. (1986)
`Nature 321: 522 - 525.
`5. Riechmann, L., Clark, M., Waldmann, H. and Winter, G. (1988) Nature
`332: 323-327.
`6. Verhoeyen, M., Milstein, C. and Winter, G. (1988) Science 239: 1534-1536.
`7. Queen, C., Schneider, W.P., Selick, H.E., Payne, P.W., Landolfi, N.F.,
`Duncan, J.F., Avdalovic, N.M., Levitt, M., Junghans, R.P. and Waldmann,
`T.A. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 10029-10033.
`8. Saiki, R.K., Scharf, S.J., Faloona, F., Mullis, K.B., Horn, G.T., Erlich,
`H.A. and Arnheim, N. (1985) Science 230: 1350-1354.
`9. Mullis, K.B., Faloona, F., Scharf, S.J., Saiki, R.K., Horn, G.T. and Erlich,
`H.A. (1986) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. BioL 51: 263-273.
`10. Higuchi, R., Krummel, B. and Saiki, R.K. (1988) Nucleic Acids Res. 16:
`7351-7367.
`11. Ho, S.N., Hunt, H.D., Horton, R.M., Pullen, J.K. and Pease, L.R. (1989)
`Gene 77: 51-59.
`12. Horton, R.M., Hunt, H.D., Ho, S.N., Pullen, J.K. and Pease, L.R. (1989)
`Gene 77: 61-68.
`13. Vallette, F., Mege, E., Reiss, A. and Adesnik, M. (1989) Nucleic Acids
`Res. 17: 723-733.
`14. Chirgwin, J.M., Przybyla, A.E., MacDonald, R.J. and Rutter, W.J. (1979)
`Biochemistry 18: 5294-5299.
`15. Wright, S.D., Rao, P.E., Van Voorhis, W.C., Craigmyle, L.S., Ilda, K.,
`Talle, M.A., Westberg, E.F., Goldstein, G. and Silverstein, S.C. (1983)
`Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 80: 5699-5703.
`16. Berkner, K.L. and Sharp, P.A. (1985) Nucleic Acids Res. 13: 841-857.
`17. Rothstein, S.J. and Reznikoff, W.S. (1981) Cell 23: 191-199.
`18. Silberklang, M., Kopchick, J., Munshi, S. Lenny, A., Livelli, T. and Ellis,
`R.W. (1987) In Spier, R.E. and Griffiths, B., (ed.) Modern Approaches
`to Animal Cell Technology, Butterworth, U.K., pp. 199-214 .
`19. Gillies, S.D., Morrison, S.L., Oi, V.T. and Tonegawa, S. (1983) Cell 33:
`717-728
`20. Flanagan, J.G. and Rabbitts, T.H. (1982) Nature 30: 709-713.
`21. Hieter, P.A., Max, E.E., Seidman, J.G., Maizel, J.V. and Leder, P. (1980)
`Cell 22: 197-207.
`22. Gritz, L. and Davies, J. (1983) Gene 25: 179-188.
`23. Graham, F.L. and van der Eb, A.J. (1973) Virology, 52: 456-467.
`24. Wigler, M., Silverstein, S., Lee, L.S., Pellicer, A., Cheng, Y.C. and Axel,
`R. (1977) Cell 11: 223 -232.
`25. Singer, I.I., Sc

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket