throbber
Proc Natl Acad. Sci. USA
`Vol. 80, pp. 825-829, February 1983
`Immunology
`
`Immunoglobulin gene expression in transformed lymphoid cells
`
`Departments of *Genetics and tBiochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford. California 94305; and tDe
`Center. Institute of Cancer Reseuch, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, New York
`Contributed by Leonard A . Henenberg, October 15,1982
`
`ent of Microbiology and the Cancer
`
`ABSTRACX Myeloma, hybridoma, and thymoma cell lines
`have been successfully transfected for the Escherichia cdi xan-
`thine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase gene (gpt) by using the
`plasmid vector pSV2-gpt. The transformed cells synthesize the
`bacterial enzyme $phospho-cr-wribose-1-diph0sphate:xanthine
`phosphoribosyltransferase (XGPRT; EC 2.4.2.22) and have been
`maintained in selective medium for over 4 months. Lymphoid cell
`lines expressing a K immunoglobulin light chain were obtained by
`transfeding cells with pSV2-gpt containing a rearranged K light
`chain genomic segment from the S107 myeloma cell line. The S107
`light chain is synthesized in gpt-transformed J558L myeloma cells
`and is identical to the light chain synthesized by the SlM myeloma
`cell line, as judged by immunoprecipitation and two-dimensional
`gel electrophoresis, Furthermore, this light chain is synthesized
`and secreted as part of an intact antibody molecule by transformed
`hybridoma cells that normally secrete an IgGl ( y , ~ ) antibody
`molecule. No light chain synthesis was detected in a similarly
`transformed rat myeloma or a mouse thymoma line.
`
`Techniques to introduce novel genes into eukaryotic cells pro-
`vide a powerful tool to study mechanisms ofgene regulation and
`expression. Most studies on eukaryotic gene expression have
`genes have
`been conducted in heterologous host cells-i.e.,
`been transfected into cell types (particularly human HeLa and
`mouse L cells) that normally do not express the gene of interest
`(1-3). Though a great deal has been learned about eukaryotic
`regulator sequences with these gene transfer experiments, it
`would be preferable to transfer genes encoding proteins ex-
`pressed during differentiation back into the cell type that nor-
`mally expresses the genes of interest. The appropriate cell type
`provides protein modification systems, such as glycosyltrans-
`ferases, necessary to make fully biological functional products.
`In addition, the appropriate cell type may be used to study tis-
`sue-specific regulation of gene expression.
`To undertake studies of (i) the regulation and expression of
`immunoglobulin genes, (ii) the biosynthesis, chain-assembly,
`and secretion of immunoglobulin heavy and light chains, and
`(iii) structure-hnction correlates of antibody molecules, we
`have explored techniques for transfeetion of lymphoid cells us-
`ing the pSV2-gpt vector (4, 5). This DNA can express the Eco
`gpt gene encoding xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase
`(XGPRT; 5-phospho-a-D-ribose-.Jdiphosphate:xanthine phos-
`phoribosyltransferase, EC 2.4.2.22). Cells synthesizing XGPRT
`can be grown with xanthine as the sole precursor of guanine
`nucleotide formation (4, 5). Successfully transformed cells can
`be isolated by their ability to grow in medium containing xan-
`thine and mycophenolic acid, an inhibitor of guanine nucleotide
`synthesis; if the transformed cell line is hypoxanthine phos-
`phoribosyltransferase-negative (HPRT-; IMP pyrophosphate
`phosphoribosyltransferase, EC 2.4.2.8), transformants can be
`
`-
`
`- -
`
`-
`
`The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge
`payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked 'hdwrtise-
`ment" in accordance with 18 U. S. C. 51734 solely to indicate this fact.
`
`selected in hypoxanthine/aminopterin/thymidine (HAT) me-
`dium (6). In the present experiments both calcium phosphate
`precipitation (7, 8) and protoplast fusion (9) techniques have
`been used to transfect cells.
`pSV2-gpt containing a rearranged K light chain gene (10) was
`used to transform several cultured lymphoid cell lines. Among
`the gpt transformants were clones that produce a new immu-
`noglobulin light chain. The light chain produced by these trans-
`formed cell lines appears to be identical to the light chain syn-
`thesized by the myeloma cell fiom which the rearranged gene
`was isolated. Furthermore, in transformed hybridoma cells,
`this light chain is assembled with an immunoglobulin heavy
`chain and secreted as a complete antibody molecule.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Cell Lines. J558L is a spontaneous heavy chain-loss-variant
`myeloma cell line obtained from the J558 cell line [a,A; anti-al-
`3 dextran (ll)] that synthesizes and secretes a A light chain. Y3-
`Ag1.2.3 is a HPRTrat myeloma cell line originally described
`by Galfre et a l (12) that synthesizes and secretes a rat K light
`chain. 27-44is a HPRT- mouse IgGl anti-dansyl hybridomacell
`line (13); and BW5147 is a HPRT-, ouabainr AKR thymoma
`originally described by Hyman and Stallings (14). Cell lines
`were maintained in either 10% newborn calf serum in Dul-
`becco's moddied minimal essential medium (DME medium) or
`10% fetal calf serum in alpha moddied minimal essential me-
`dium.
`Recombinant DNA Vectors. The plasmid vector pSV2-gpt
`has been described (4, 5). Fig. 1 shows a partial restriction en-
`zyme map of this vector. A second vector, which is derived from
`pSV2-gpt, but contains the herpes simplex thymidine kinase
`promoter inserted 5' of the gpt gene, was constructed by J.-F.
`Nicolas (unpublished data). pSV2-S107 was constructed by in-
`serting a BamHI fragment containing the entire rearranged
`phosphocholine-specific K chain gene from the S107 myeloma
`cell line (10) into the unique BamHI site in pSV2-gpt. The light
`cham gene is oriented so that the direction of transcription is
`opposite to the gpt gene (Fig. 1). The genomic rearranged S107
`K light chain DNA was a gift from M. Scharff.
`Transfection by Protoplast Fusion. Protoplasts were pre-
`pared essentially as described by Sandri-Goldin et d (9). &h-
`erichia coli K-12 strain HB101, containing the appropriate plas-
`mid, was grown at 3 P C in Luria broth containing 1% glucose
`to an absorbance at 600 nm of 0.6-0.8. Chloramphenicol was
`added to 125 pg/ml, the culture was incubated at 37OC for 12-
`16 hr to ampllfy the plasmid copy number, and the cells were
`harvested by centrifugation. For every 25 ml of culture, 1.25
`ml of chilled 20% sucrose/0.05 M TrisHCl (pH 8) was added;
`
`Abbreviations: XGPRT. xanthine-manine phosphoribosyltransferase;
`
`HPRT, hypoxanthine phosphoribo~ltransf~rase;-~~~, h&xanthine/
`aminopterin/thymidine; DME medium, Dulbecco's modified minimal
`essential medium.
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1025, pg 716
`
`

`
`826
`
`Immunology: Oi et oL
`
`Proc. Nod Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983)
`
`Fro. 1. Structure of the vectora
`used for lymphoid cell transforma-
`tions. The dmgmm of the parental
`pSV2-gpt plasmid vector waa taken
`h m Mulligaa and Berg (4,s): pBR322
`DNA ie represented by the solid black
`linee and the plaamid'e DNA replica-
`tion origin and plactarnase gene are
`indicated, the gpt gene sequence is
`represented by the hatched segments;
`simian virua 40 (SV40) eequencea are
`the stippled segments. The SV40 ori-
`gin of DNA replication (on) and early
`promoter are loeated 5' of the gpt ee
`auencee. ~1sv2-mtTK~r has an ineer-
`6on of 24% ba&-&m; containing the
`herpea simplex thymidine kinase pro-
`moter, between the gpt gene and the
`SV40 early promoter (unpublished
`data). pSV2-S107 has a 7-kilobase
`BamHI fragment, containing the en-
`tire genomic S107 light chain gene,
`V,
`J~ inserted into the unique BamHI site
`of pSV2-gpt. This rearranged light
`chain gene is oriented in the oppoeite
`direction tagpt and cnntains the leader,
`V, and K constant redon exons as well
`flanking 5' and 3; sequences.
`
`until used, whereupon it was diluted to two times concentrated
`and adjusted to pH 7.05. Plasmid DNA (80 kg/ml) was made
`up in 125 mM CaClz which was stored as a 2 M stock solution
`at -20°C. DNA-calcium phosphate precipitates were formed
`by dropwise addition of the DNA into the HeBS solution. The
`precipitate formed in 30 rnin at room temperature. The final
`DNA concentration was 40 pg/ml.
`Cells were washed once in serum-free medium and were
`suspended directly in the DNA-calcium ~hosphate precipitate
`(lo6 cells per 20 pg of DNA per 0.5 ml). This suspension was
`incubated at 37°C for 30 rnin and then was diluted 1:10 in
`serumcontaining medium. The cells were plated either into 24-
`well plates (2 x I d cells per well) or S w e l l plates (2 x lo4
`cells per well). Transfection of Y3 cells was done as described
`by Graham and Van der Eb (8) for adherent cell lines. The DNA-
`calcium phosphate precipitate was put directly onto the cell
`monolayer. After 30 rnin at 3PC, serumcontaining medium
`was added. After 24 hr, half of the medium volume from each
`culture was removed and was replaced with fresh medium. On
`days 3, 4, 5, 8, 11, and 14, half the medium volume was re-
`moved and HAT medium was added. Transformed colonies
`were visible between 10 and 21 days.
`Immunoprecipitations and Gel Electrophoresis. Immuno-
`precipitations were done with [35S]methionine-labeled cell ly-
`sates and supernates. Biosynthetic labeling procedures have
`been described (16). Rabbit anti-mouse light chains, rabbit anti-
`mouse K light chains, rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin, and
`a hybridoma anti-mouse IgGl allotype antibody were used for
`immunoprecipitations. Staphylococcus aureus, Cowan strain 1
`(IgCsorb; Enzyme Center, Boston) was used to coprecipitate
`the antigen-antibody complexes (16).
`One-dimensional NaDodSO,/polyacrylamide slab electro-
`phoresis and two-dimensional nonequilibrium gradient gel
`electrophoresis were done as described (17). Autoradiography
`ofpolyacrylamide gels was with preflashed XAR-5 film and fluo-
`rography by using sodium salicylate (18).
`
`RESULTS
`Transfection Frequencies. The frequency at which stable
`transformed lymphoid cell lines were generated was influenced
`
`Em-apc
`
`the bacteria were suspended and 0.25 ml of lysozyme [a freshly
`prepared solution of 5 mg/ml in 0.25 M Tris-HC1 (pH 8)] was
`added. After 5 rnin of incubation on ice, 0.5 ml of 0.25 M EDTA
`(pH 8) was added and incubation on ice was continued for an
`additional 5 min. After addition of 0.5 ml of 0.05 M Tris-HC1
`(pH 8), the bacteria were transferred to a 37°C water bath and
`were incubated for 10 min. At this time examination of the bac-
`teria with a phase-contrast microscope showed that the vast
`majority had been converted to protoplasts. The bacteria were
`diluted with 10 ml of DME medium containing 10% sucrose
`and 10 mM MgCl, that was warmed to 37% After further in-
`cubation for 10 rnin at room temperature the protoplasts were
`ready for fusion.
`Fusion of protoplasts with suspension cells was effected with
`a procedure normally used in the production of hybridomas
`(15). Cell lines were grown to a density of O . S l x lo6 cells per
`ml in DME medium supplemented with 10% newborn calf
`serum. Five milliliters of the protoplast suspension was added
`to 2 x lo6 cells in growth medium. The mixture was centrifuged
`for 5 rnin at room temperature at approximately 500 X g. The
`supernate was aspirated and the pellet was resuspended gently
`in 2 ml of a polyethylene glycol solution [50 g of polyethylene
`glycol 1,500 (BDH) in 50 ml of DME medium] adjusted to pH
`8 with CO,. After 3 rnin of centrifugation at 500 x g the poly-
`ethylene glycol was diluted with 7 ml of DME medium while
`resuspending the pellet. After 5 rnin of centrifugation at 500
`x g, the supernate was removed carefully and the cells were
`resuspended in DME medium containing 10% newborn calf
`serum and garamycin at 100 pg/ml and were plated either in
`96-well or 24-well plates. After 48 hr, cells were diluted with
`an equal volume of DME medium containing xanthine at 250
`pg/ml, hypoxanthine at 15 pg/ml, mycophenolic acid at 6 pg/
`ml, and 10% newborn calf serum. Every several days, as re-
`quired, spent medium was aspirated carefully and was replaced
`with fresh medium containing the same supplements. Colonies
`of transformants were visible by 10 days. Transformants were
`maintained in selective medium.
`Transfection by Calcium Phosphate Precipitation. Lym-
`phoid cell lines grown in suspension were transfected by cal-
`cium phosphate precipitation as described by Chu and Sharp
`(7). Ten times concentrated HeBS buffer was stored at -20°C
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1025, pg 717
`
`

`
`Immunology: Oi et d
`
`Proc. Natl A d . Sci. USA 80 (1983)
`
`827
`
`Table 2. Transformation of lymphoid cell linee with the pSV2-
`gpt vectors by using calcium phosphate precipitation
`Cell line
`BW5147
`27-44
`Y3
`Vector
`1/192+
`10/192t
`3/48.
`pSV2-gpt
`1/192t
`10/192t
`19/48*
`pSVZ-gptTKpr
`O/192t
`43/288+
`47/48*
`pSV2S107
`Results are from three experiments with the Y3 cell line and two
`
`experiments with 27-44 and ~ ~ 5 1 4 7 celr lines.
`Cells were plated in Zbwell culture diehes at 2 x 10' cells per well.
`t Cells were platdin 96-well culture dishes at 4 x 10' cells per well.
`
`Ofthe four cell lines stably transformed with pSV2-S107, the
`J558L cell line synthesized, but did not secrete, the S107 K light
`chain. However, this cell line was not expected to secrete the
`newly made light chains because heavy chain-loss-variants of
`the S107 myeloma cell line also do not secrete endogenous light
`chains (M. Scharff, personal communication). Transformants of
`the 27-44 hybridoma cell line synthesized and secreted the S107
`light chain. Moreover, the S107 light chain was assembled into
`tetrameric H,L, immunoglobulin molecules with the endoge-
`nous yl heavy chain and was secreted. Twelve independently
`transformed Y3 and seven BW5147 cell lines did not produce
`detectable amounts of the S107 light chain, as judged by im-
`munoprecipitation and gel analyses. XGPRT analyses verified
`that these cells were, indeed, transformants.
`Autoradiograms of two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels
`showing the apparent M, and charge of the light chains pro-
`duced by J558L and 27-44 transfonnants are shown in Figs. 3
`and 4. The two-dimensional gel pattern of the S107 light chain
`synthesized by S107 myeloma cells is included to show that the
`transformed cell lines produced a light chain that is identical
`in apparent M, and charge. The two-dimensional gel patterns
`also show that the leader polypeptide was removed in trans-
`formed cell lines that expressed the light chain. This indicates
`that proper transcription, mRNA, and protein processing occur
`in the transformants. Transcription of the S107 light chain gene
`probably occurs from its own promoter, because the light chain
`gene is oriented opposite to the direction of the SV40 early pro-
`moter (see Fig. 1).
`The antibodies secreted by 27-44 tnmsformants were im-
`munoprecipitated with both hybridoma anti-IgC1 allotypic an-
`tibody and rabbit anti-mouse light chain antisera. Both reagents
`precipitated the S107 light chain (data not shown). Sequenhal
`precipitation, first with the hybridoma anti-IgGl antibody and
`
`by every parameter tested. Different cell lines and different
`vectors produced different transhrmation frequencies. More-
`over, the two DNA delivery procedures, protoplast fusion and
`calcium phosphate precipitation, yielded different transfor-
`mation frequencies. Tables 1 and 2 summarize the results by
`using protoplast fusion and calcium phosphate precipitation,
`respectively.
`Under the present experimental conditions, BW5147 ap-
`pears to be the least competent recipient of the cell lines tested,
`Y3
`having a transformation frequency of approximately
`and 2744 yielded frequencies in the range of 0.3 to >5 x
`In the present experiments, J558L yielded the highest fre-
`quency with the range of 3 x
`to
`Protoplast fusion
`appears on balance to be a more efficient delivery system than
`calcium phosphate precipitation.
`A striking feature of these results is the enhanced transfor-
`mation frequency for gpt obtained with the light chaincontain-
`ing vector, pSV2-S107. This dramatic increase is evident when
`the pSV2-S107 vector was used with the J558L and Y3 myeloma
`cell lines; transformation with this recombinant was 5 to at least
`10-fold greater than that obtained with the other vectors. Trans-
`formation of the hybridoma 2744 cell line was increased only
`about %fold with pSV2-S107. The sequence(s) in the pSVZ-Sl07
`insert that is responsible for the enhanced transformation fre-
`quency must yet be mapped. Transformation of the Y3 cell line
`was occasionally greater with pSV2-gptTKpr than with pSV2-
`gpt (Table 2). Regardless of which vector was used, BW5147
`transformants were detected only at very low frequencies. The
`amount of XGPRT activity in cell lines stably transformed by
`the three recombinant plasmids was not significantly Werent
`(Fig. 2 and data not shown).
`XGPRT Activity. The transformed cell lines expressed the
`Eco gpt gene, as measured by the presence of XGPRT activity
`in the cell lysates. E. coli XGPRT can be distinguished from
`mammalian HPRT activity by its different electrophoretic mo-
`bility (4,5). In cellsselected for resistance to mycophenolic acid,
`both the cellular HPRT and bacterial XGPRT activities were
`detectable (Fig. 2). Cells lacking their own HPRT activity and
`selected for gpt in HAT medium had only the bacterial en y m e
`activity (Fig. 2).
`Immunoglobulin Light Chain Expression. The organization
`of exons in the S107 genomic light chain gene is shown in Fig.
`1. To produce the S107 light chain protein from this gene, two
`introns must be processed from the primary mRNA transcripts
`and the leader polypeptide removed by post-translational cleav-
`age. For secretion of the light chain as part of an intact antibody
`molecule, the newly synthesized light chain must fold and as-
`semble with .an immunoglobulin heavy chain to form an H z b
`tetramer. This also involves the formation of interchain disul-
`fide bonds.
`
`Table 1. Transformation of lymphoid cell lines with the
`pSV2-gpt vectors by wing protoplast fusion
`Cell line
`
`BW5147
`0/76* 1/48t
`0/80* 1/48t
`4/96. 8/48?
`
`Vector
`pSV2-gpt
`pSV2-gptTKpr
`pSV2S107
`
`J558L
`21/280* 27/36t
`10/190* 24/36t
`186/192* 36/36'
`149/192*
`Results are h r n three experiments and are expressed as the number
`of culture wells having stable tramformants.
`*After protoplast fuaion cells were plated in 96-well culture dishes at
`lo4 cells uer well.
`t Cells wek plated at 1@ cells per 2.0 ml of culture in 24-well dishes.
`*Cells were plated at 5 x loS cells per well in 96-well culture.dishes.
`
`FIG. 2. XGPRT and HPRT production in transformed lymphoid
`cell lines. Enzyme analyses were done as described by Mulligan and
`Berg (4, 5). Lanes: 1 and 2, electrophoretic mobility of mammalian
`HPRT; 3-5, J558L cell tramformants; and 6 and 7, transformanta of
`the 27-44 cell line. Because 27-44 is a HPRT- cell line, only XGPRT
`is present.
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1025, pg 718
`
`

`
`828
`
`Immunology: Oi et d
`
`Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983)
`
`FIG. 4. S107 light chain produced by transformed J558L cells. Au-
`toradiograms of two-dimensional gels of light chains immunoprecip
`itated from cell lysates of J558L transformed with pSV2-S107 DNA
`are shown. Because J558L does not produce a heavy chain, only the
`light chain portions of the twodimensional gels are shown. (A) A light
`chain produced by the parental J558L cell line. (B) S187 K light chain.
`(0 A mixture of the two light chains. The K and A light chains are
`distinguished on the basis of both charge and apparent Mr. W and E )
`Two independently derived J558L cell linee transformed with pSV2-
`5107 DNA. The transformant examined in D only appears to produce
`larger quantities of the 5107 K light chain than the endogenous 5558
`A light chain, because the S107 K chain is synthe8iza-I and remains in
`the cytoplasm, while the 5558 A chain is syntheeized and secreted.
`
`compared. Amounts varied from barely detectable to quantities
`equal to endogenous light chain. This variation may he due to
`the chromosomal region where the light chain has integrated.
`It also could result from different copy number of the light chain
`gene in dlfferent transformants. Quite possibly, mutations or
`deletions of sequences needed for the expression of this gene
`could have occurred during transformation or subsequent to
`integration of the light chain sequence. Further studies are
`needed to determine the cause of this variation and why light
`chain expression does not occur in Y3 or BW5147 cell lines
`transformed with the same light chain gene vector.
`
`DISCUSSION
`These experiments show that it is possible to use two methods,
`calcium phosphate precipitation and protoplast fusion, to intro-
`duce genes into lymphoid cells. With pSV2-gpt containing the
`gene for an immunoglobulin light chain (pSV2-S107) both meth-
`ods give rise to transformants that synthesize bacterial XGPRT
`and the murine light chain. Higher transformation frequencies
`are seen following protoplast fusion. Indeed, by using protoplast
`fusion and the pSV2-S107 plasmid, transformants can be ob-
`tained at a frequency of greater than
`Transformation fre-
`quencies are lower when using the other plasmids or calcium
`phosphate precipitation. Because mycophenolic acid resistance
`or reversion of the HPRT- phenotype do not occur sponta-
`neously in the cell lines used, stable transformation, at even low
`frequencies, can be detected.
`A surprising result is the increased frequency of gpt trans-
`formation when the S107 light chain is incorporated into the
`
`FIG. 3. 5107 light chain produd by transformed 27-44 cells. Au-
`toradiograms of two-dimensional gels of the light and heavy chains
`produced by parental and transformed cell lines are shown. (A) Pa-
`rental 27-44 IgGl anti-dansyl antibody immunoprecipitated with an
`anti-IgG1-specific hybridoma antibody. Both the yl heavy and K light
`chains can be seen. (B) 5107 IgA antibody immunoprecipitated with
`a rabbit anti-IgA antiserum. The a heavy chain was distinguished
`clearly by charge and apparent M, from the yl heavy chain in A. (0
`A mixture of the immunoprecipitates of A and B. The two K light
`chains can be seen as diatinct .spots (indicated by m w 8 ) having
`nearly identical charge but different apparent Mr. (D) Immunoprecip
`itate of a transformed 27-44 cell line. Only the yl heavy chain was
`present, but two light chains can be seen. In this case the amount of
`S107 light chain was considerably lower than in the artificial mixture
`shown in C.
`
`then with the rabbit anti-K antisera, indicated that little, if any,
`free S107 light chain was secreted by these cells. This shows that
`the S107 light chain is assembled with the yl heavy chain into
`an intact antibody molecule.
`Different amounts of S107 light chains were produced when
`a number of independent J558L and 27-44 transformants were
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1025, pg 719
`
`

`
`Immunology: Oi et d
`
`Proc. NatL Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983)
`
`829
`
`pSV2-gpt vector. This enhancing effect occurs with both the rat
`and mouse myelomas. A similar increased transformation fre-
`quency has been observed with a bovine papillomavirus vector
`containing the human pglobin region sequences (19). At pres-
`ent, the mechanism for the increased transformation frequency
`in both cases is obscure. Possibly, the chromosomal DNA pro-
`vides an origin of DNA replication, which permits the plasmid
`to replicate within the transformed cell and increases the trans-
`formation hequency. Transcription hom the immunoglobulin
`promoter cannot be essential for the increased transfbrmation
`frequencies because deletion of the fragments that are pre-
`sumed to contain the immunoglobulin promoter region does not
`abolish the enhancement of transformation. It also is possible
`that pSV2-S107 is more efficient for transformation because of
`increased XGPRT production; this seems unlikely because
`there are no consistent differences in enzyme levels in the stable
`transformants obtained with either vector.
`DNA-mediated gene transfer into lymphoid cells may permit
`a study of the regulation and expression of immunoglobulin
`genes in cells in which they normally are synthesized. It may
`be possible to examine the basis b r differential immunoglobulin
`gene expression at M e r e n t stages of lymphocyte differentia-
`tion. Cell lines in which immunoglobulin synthesis ca I be in-
`duced (20-22) are suitable hosts to determine if the transduced
`immunoglobulin genes also are responsive to those signals.
`Studies with cells transformed with genetic elements that are
`inducible by steroid hormones demonstrate that transduced
`DNA can respond, if the cell contains the appropriate receptors
`(23).
`. .
`A question of central importance is what determines the uti-
`lization of various promoters and thus the synthesis of defined
`proteins in certain cell lines. In our experiments light chains
`are efficiently produced in both transformed mouse myeloma
`and hybridoma cell lines. However, light chain production did
`not occur in either a rat myeloma or a mouse thymoma. The
`inability of the immunoglobulin promoter to function in a dif-
`ferent species has been reported by Falkner and Zachau (24).
`The lack of production of mouse immuaoglobuhn in a rat my-
`eloma is surprising because mouse myelomas have been used
`to fuse to rat myelomas to produce hybrid cells that synthesize
`both rat and mouse immunoglobulin molecules (25). The pos-
`sibility that the S107 light chain is synthesized but rapidly de-
`graded in the Y3 myeloma has not been excluded.
`There is evidence that differentiated cell t ~ p e s exDress im-
`munoglobulin genes to varying levels. v or e x k p l e , somaticcell
`hybridization of myelomas yields hybridomas that produce an-
`tibodies, whereas thymomas yield hybrid cells wi&~-cell phe-
`notypes (26). Furthermore, hybridization of myelomas with
`non-B cells results in cessation of immunoglobulin production
`(26, 27). The lack of light chain expression in the transformed
`thymoma may reflect tissue-specific gene regulation. It is im-
`portant to determine if immunoglobulin gene expression in the
`nonexpressing mouse thymoma and rat myeloma cell lines is
`regulated a t the level of transcription, RNA processing, trans-
`lation, or rapid protein turnover.
`The study of the structure and function of the immunoglob-
`ulin molecule has been of great interest, both because of the
`ability of immunoglobulin to react with a diverse family of li-
`gands and also because of the biologic importance of antibody
`molecules. Initially, the study of immunoglobulins was limited
`to the study of het-erogeneous serum pools after immunization.
`The advent of myelomas, and more recently hybridomas, has
`permitted the s&dy of homogeneous populations of antibodies.
`DNA-mediated transfection and immunoglobulin gene expres-
`sion is an important tool to permit the study of immunogloiulin
`
`molecules. By using this technique, it should be possible to
`study the hnction of both novel chain combinations and novel
`chain structures. In oitro site-specific mutagenesis techniques
`can be used to construct specific mutations in immunoglobulin
`genes that can be expressed after transfecticm. Because signif-
`icant quantities of immunoglobulin are produced in the trans-
`formants, sufficient quantities of protein necessary for detailed
`analyses should be obtained.
`Note Added in Proof. After this paper was submitted for, publication,
`we learned that Douglas Rice and David Baltimore have reported sim-
`ilar results with a different K light chain gene and different lymphoid
`cell recipients (28).
`We thank Dr. P. Jones for assistance with two-dimensional gel elec-
`trophoresis. This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
`Health Grants GM-132.35, CA-15513 (P.B.), AI-08917 (L.A.H.), CA-
`16858 (S. L. M.), CA-22736 (S.L. M.), and CA-13696 to The Cancer Cen-
`ter of Columbia University and by a grant from the Becton Dickinson
`FACS Systems (L.A.H.). S.L.M. is a recipient of Research Career
`Development Award AI-00408.
`1. Mantei, N., Boll, W. & Weissmann, C. (1979) Nature (London)
`281.404.
`2. ~ e h o n , P., Parker, V., Gluman, Y. & Maniatis, T. (1981) Cell
`27,279-288.
`3. ~ h t e i , N. & Weissmann, C. (1982) Nature (Londa) 237, 128-
`132.
`4. ~ i l l i ~ a n , R. C. & Berg, P. (1980) Science e09, 1422-1427.
`5. Mulligan, R. C. & Berg, P. (1981) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78,
`2072-2076.
`6. Littlefield, J. W. (1964) Science 145, 703-710.
`7. Chu, G. & Sharp, P. A. (1981) Gene 13,197-202.
`8. Graham, F. L. & Van der Eb, A. J. (1973)l. Virol52,455-456.
`9. Sandri-Goldin, R. M., Goldin, A. L., Levine, M. & Glorioso, J.
`C. (1981) Mol CeU. Bfol 1. 743-752.
`10. K-, s:-P., Rudikoff, s.; Seidman, J. G., Leder, P. & S c h d ,
`M. D. (1981) J . Em. Med. 153. 1W-1370:
`11. Lundblad, A.; ~teUer, R., ICabat, E. A., Hint, J. W., Weigert,
`M. G. & Coha, M. (1972) l m m u n o c ~ y 9,535-544.
`12. Galfre, G., Milstein, C. & Wright, B. ((1979) Nature (London)
`277,131-133.
`13. Dangl, J. L., Parks, D. R., Oi, V. T. & Henenberg, L. A. (1982)
`Cytomety 2,395-401.
`14. Hyman, R. & Stalhgs, V. (1974)J. Natl Cancer Inst. 52, 429-
`436.
`15. Sharon, J., Monison, S. L. & Kabat, E. A. (1979) Proc. Natl
`Acad Sci. USA 76, 142.0-1424.
`16. Oi, V. T., Bryan, V. M., Henenberg, L. A. & Henenberg, L.
`A. (1980)l. Exp. Med. 151, 1260-1274.
`17. Oi, V. T., Jones, P. P., Goding, J. W., Henenberg, L. A. &
`Henenberg, L. A. (1978) Cum. Top. Microbial lmmunol 81,
`115-129.
`18. Moosic, J. P., Sung, E., Nilson, A., Jones, P. & McKean, D. J.
` Z57, 9684-9691.
`(1982)l. Bwl C h .
`19. Di Maio, O., Treisman, R. & Maniatis, T. (1982) Proc. Natl Acod.
`Sci. USA 79,40304034.
`20. Paige, C. J., Kincade, P. W. &Ralph, P. (1978)J. lmmunol 121,
`641-647.
`21. Knapp, M. R., Severinson-Gronowicz, E., Schroder, J. &
`Strober, S. (1979)l. lmmunol 123, 1000-1006.
`22. Boyd, A. W., Goding, J. W. & Schrader, J. W. (1981)].ZmmunoL
`126, 1261-1265.
`23. Lee, F., Mulligan, R., Berg, P. & Ringold, G. (1981) Nature
`(London) 294,228-232.
`24. Falkner, F. G. & Zachau, H. G. (1982) Nature (London) 298,
`286-288.
`25. Cotton, R. G. H. & Milstein, C. (1973) Nature (London) 244,42-
`A? m-.
`26. Goldsby, R. A., Osbome, B. A., Simpson, E. & Henenberg, L.
`A. (1977) Nature (London) 267, 707-708.
`27. Coffino, P., Knowles, B.. Nathenson. S. G. & S c h d . M. D.
`(1971) Nature (London) al, 87-90.
`28. Rice, D. & Baltimore, D. (1982) Proc Natl Acad. Sci. USA 79,
`7862-7865.
`
`'
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1025, pg 720

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket