`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`GENZYME CORPORATION, GENZYME CORPORATION,
`
`Petitioner Petitioner
`
`v. v.
`
`
`GENENTECH, INC. AND CITY OF HOPE, GENENTECH, INC. AND CITY OF HOPE,
`
`Patent Owners Patent Owners
`
`
`Case No. IPR2016-00383 Case No. IPR2016-00383
`
`U. S. Patent No. 6,331,415 U. S. Patent No. 6,331,415
`
`
`Declaration of Timothy Creagan in Support of Petitioner's Reply to Declaration of Timothy Creagan in Support of Petitioner's Reply to
`
`Patent Owners' Preliminary Response Patent Owners' Preliminary Response
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1061, pg. 1319
`
`
`
`
`
`I, Timothy Creagan, declare as follows: I, Timothy Creagan, declare as follows:
`
`
`
`1. 1.
`
`
`
`I am the Vice President of Intellectual Property at Genzyme I am the Vice President of Intellectual Property at Genzyme
`
`
`
`Corporation ("Genzyme"). Corporation ("Genzyme").
`
`
`
`2. 2.
`
`
`
`Genzyme is a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of Sanofi SA, the Genzyme is a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of Sanofi SA, the
`
`
`
`ultimate parent company of Genzyme. Sanofi SA is a publicly traded entity, ultimate parent company of Genzyme. Sanofi SA is a publicly traded entity,
`
`
`
`headquartered in France. Sanofi SA acquired Genzyme in April 2011 through a headquartered in France. Sanofi SA acquired Genzyme in April 2011 through a
`
`
`
`purchase of 100% of Genzyme stock. purchase of 100% of Genzyme stock.
`
`
`
`3. 3.
`
`
`
`Since the acquisition, and until a corporate restructuring that took Since the acquisition, and until a corporate restructuring that took
`
`
`
`effect on January 1, 2016, Genzyme was a separate, independent business unit of effect on January 1, 2016, Genzyme was a separate, independent business unit of
`
`
`
`Sanofi SA. During that time period, net sales for Genzyme's products were Sanofi SA. During that time period, net sales for Genzyme's products were
`
`
`
`reported separately in the annual reports of Sanofi SA. reported separately in the annual reports of Sanofi SA.
`
`
`
`4. 4.
`
`
`
`From the time of the acquisition through December 30, 2015, From the time of the acquisition through December 30, 2015,
`
`
`
`Genzyme's legal department functioned with a large extent of autonomy from Genzyme's legal department functioned with a large extent of autonomy from
`
`
`
`Sanofi SA. No lawyers in Genzyme's legal department had any direct reporting Sanofi SA. No lawyers in Genzyme's legal department had any direct reporting
`
`
`
`requirement to anyone (either legal or management) in Sanofi SA. Genzyme paid requirement to anyone (either legal or management) in Sanofi SA. Genzyme paid
`
`
`
`for its Inter Partes Reviews, litigations and related patent matters through its own for its Inter Partes Reviews, litigations and related patent matters through its own
`
`
`
`budget. Genzyme also made the ultimate decisions of whether and when patent-budget. Genzyme also made the ultimate decisions of whether and when patent-
`
`
`
`related legal proceedings would be filed, seeking the authorization only from related legal proceedings would be filed, seeking the authorization only from
`
`
`
`Genzyme management. With respect to legal proceedings that were filed, Genzyme management. With respect to legal proceedings that were filed,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1061, pg. 1320
`
`
`
`
`
`Genzyme controlled the strategies and manner in which they were prosecuted or Genzyme controlled the strategies and manner in which they were prosecuted or
`
`
`
`defended against. defended against.
`
`
`
`5. Genzyme, with the assistance of its outside counsel, solely prepared 5. Genzyme, with the assistance of its outside counsel, solely prepared
`
`
`
`and filed the present IPR proceeding. It was Genzyme that desired review of U.S. and filed the present IPR proceeding. It was Genzyme that desired review of U.S.
`
`
`
`Patent 6,331,415, and it was Genzyme that was solely responsible for directing, Patent 6,331,415, and it was Genzyme that was solely responsible for directing,
`
`
`
`controlling, and funding (including costs and legal fees) the preparation and filing controlling, and funding (including costs and legal fees) the preparation and filing
`
`
`
`of the present IPR. Genzyme's General Counsel, Tracey McCain, granted power of of the present IPR. Genzyme's General Counsel, Tracey McCain, granted power of
`
`
`
`attorney to Genzyme's outside counsel at Mayer Brown LLP to transact business attorney to Genzyme's outside counsel at Mayer Brown LLP to transact business
`
`
`
`with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in connection with the present IPR. with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in connection with the present IPR.
`
`
`
`6. Neither Sanofi SA nor sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC participated in the 6. Neither Sanofi SA nor sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC participated in the
`
`
`
`decision to file the present IPR. They did not co-author Genzyme's Petition, decision to file the present IPR. They did not co-author Genzyme's Petition,
`
`
`
`exercise any control over the filing or content of the Petition, or provide funding or exercise any control over the filing or content of the Petition, or provide funding or
`
`
`
`other compensation for the preparation and filing of the Petition. At no point did other compensation for the preparation and filing of the Petition. At no point did
`
`
`
`Genzyme seek authorization from anyone at Sanofi SA or sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC Genzyme seek authorization from anyone at Sanofi SA or sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC
`
`
`
`regarding the content, funding or timing of filing of the present IPR. regarding the content, funding or timing of filing of the present IPR.
`
`
`
`7. 7.
`
`
`
`The corporate restructuring that took effect on January 1, 2016, was The corporate restructuring that took effect on January 1, 2016, was
`
`
`
`prospectively announced in July 2015 by Olivier Brandicourt, the CEO of the prospectively announced in July 2015 by Olivier Brandicourt, the CEO of the
`
`
`
`Sanofi SA. As part of the restructuring, the reporting structure between Genzyme Sanofi SA. As part of the restructuring, the reporting structure between Genzyme
`
`
`
`and Sanofi SA also changed, with the heads of certain Genzyme departments and Sanofi SA also changed, with the heads of certain Genzyme departments
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1061, pg. 1321
`
`
`
`20
`20 20
`
`
`Genzyme Ex. 1061, pg. 1322