throbber
Ann. Hum. &net. (1981), 45, 13S-141
`Printed in &eat Britain
`
`135
`
`Chromosomal localization of a single copy gene by
`in situ hybridization - human p globin genes on the
`short arm of chromosome 11
`
`BY S. MALCOLM, P. BARTON, C. MURPHY AND M. A. FERGUSON-SMITH
`Biochemistry Department, Queen Elizabeth College, London, W8,
`and Institute of Medical Genetics, Yorkhill, Glasgow
`
`SUMMARY
`1. The localization of the /3 globin genes by in situ hybridization to fixed chromosomes is
`described.
`2. The probe used was a [3H]cRNA copy of a genomic clone containing in total 4 4 kb of DNA
`and including the p globin gene.
`3. The evidence for the localization of the gene comes from three pieces of data, (a)
`Chromosome 11 is labelled to double the extent expected if the grains were randomly
`distributed, (b) the extra grains above background are clustered on the short arm of 11 close
`to the centromere, and (c) the absolute number of grains observed is very close to that predicted
`for a probe of that length by comparison with ribosomal genes. The localization is in agreement
`with that obtained by other methods.
`4. This method could be extended to any gene for which a genomic clone containing a t least
`5 kb of single copy DNA is available.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`In situ hybridization to fixed metaphase preparations from cultured lymphocytes has been
`used to locate several repetitive gene families in man such as 28s and 18s ribosomal RNA genes
`(Evans, Buckland & Pardue, 1974), 5s genes (Steffensen et al. 1975) and histone genes (Chandler
`et al. 1979). This method of gene localization can be used directly on normal chromosome
`preparations and avoids the problems associated with somatic cell hybrids which are time-
`consuming to prepare a d may contain undetected chromosomal rearrangements or fragments.
`The use of chromosomal translocations allows very precise localizations to be made (Fennel1
`et al. 1979).
`The method has previously been restricted to repetitive genes because of the extremely small
`quantity of DNA found in a single chromosome and the maximum possible specific radioactivity
`of the RNA or DNA used as a gene probe in hybridization. However, the availability of cloned
`genomic fragments containing structural genes and the intervening and surrounding sequences
`(Lawn et al. 1978) means that the length of DNA sequence hybridized for single copy genes may
`approach that for repetitive families. We have used an RNA transcript from a restriction
`fragment from one of the best characterized systems, the p globin gene, to confirm both the
`localization of this gene on chromosome 11 and the regional localization close to the centrornere
`on the short arm.
`
`0003-4800/81 /oooO-4516 $01 .OO 0 1981 University College London
`
`GENENTECH 2017
`GENZYME V. GENENTECH
`IPR2016-00383
`
`

`
`136
`
`S. MALCOLM AND OTHERS
`
`METHODS
`
`Chromosome preparations
`Metaphase chromosomes were prepared by culturing normal lymphocytes with phytohaem-
`agglutinin as previously described (Ferguson-Smith, 1974). Before hybridization chromosomes
`were treated with a 1 % aqueous solution of lipsol detergent and stained with Leischman's stain
`for photography.
`
`I n situ hybridization
`After treatment with RNAase A (Sigma) at 100 pg/ml at 37 O C for 30 min, chromosomes were
`denatured in 60% formamide, 5 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7-0, at 55 OC for 15 min. Ten
`ng of [3H]cRNA (specific activity 1.8 x lo* dpmlpg) in 5 pl of hybridization buffer (50 yo
`formamide, 0-6M-NaC1, 5mM HEPES pH 7.0) were incubated with each slide a t 43 "C
`overnight. Slides were then treated with RNAase A at 10 pg/ml, 37 OC, 30 min to remove
`non-hybridized or mismatched labelled cRNA and washed thoroughly in 2 x SSC. After
`dehydration through a series of alcohols, the slides were dipped in Ilford K 2 Nuclear Emulsion
`and exposed a t 4 O C for 40 days. The slides were then developed and the cells that had previously
`been photographed were re-examined with a microscope for silver grains.
`Complementary RNA. [3H]cRNA was made by the method of Jones (1974). ATP, CTP and
`UTP were radioactively labelled with [3H] and the specific activity of the cRNA was
`1-7 x lo8 dpm/pg.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Hybridization probe
`The recombinant plasmid (HPIS) used to prepare the cRNA gene probe contains the human
`/3 globin gene and its intervening and surrounding DNA sequences to a total length of 4.4
`kilobases (kb). This plasmid, kindly provided by Dr Tom Maniatis of California Institute of
`Technology, was prepared by inserting a Pst I restriction fragment containing the /? globin genes
`into plasmid PBR 322. A full restriction map of this region of the chromosome is shown in
`Bernards et al. (1979). This fragment hybridizes to a single band of restricted DNA in Southern
`blot hybridization at a final wash of 0.1 x SSC, 65 "C (T. Maniatis, personal communication, and
`our unpublished data).
`
`Chromosomal distribution of grains
`Human metaphase cells were banded and stained with Lipsol/Leischman's and photographed.
`The position of each cell was noted and, after in situ hybridization and autoradiography, the
`same cells were relocated by microscope and scored for autoradiographic silver grains. This
`allows the unequivocal identification of each chromosome. Fifty-five cells were karyotyped and
`the grains falling on each chromosome determined (Table 1). Since the cells have been selected
`for the quality of the metaphase preparation prior to in situ hybridization, observer bias in cell
`selection cannot occur. An allowance for the different lengths of the chromosomes has been made
`by dividing the number of grains occurring over each chromosome by the percentage of the total
`genomic DNA found in that chromosome (Ferguson-Smith, 1974). This gives the number of
`grains per unit length for each chromosome where a unit length is 1 O/" of the DNA of the human
`
`

`
`Chromosomal localization of a single copy gene by in situ hybridization
`
`137
`
`Table 1. Total grain counts per chromosome in 55 cells analysed
`
`Chromosome
`I
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`I 0
`I 1
`I 2
`'3
`14
`'5
`16
`I7
`I 8
`19
`20
`21
`22
`
`x
`Y
`
`Total no.
`of grains
`72
`61
`63
`54
`58
`5'
`42
`43
`5 1
`47
`93
`53
`34
`36
`37
`49
`31
`38
`26
`21
`I 2
`22
`23
`8
`
`Yo of genome
`8'47
`7.76
`6.56
`613
`5'58
`5'65
`5'00
`4'77
`473
`435
`435
`416
`3'59
`3.28
`3.1 I
`3.1 I
`3.02
`2'73
`2.58
`2.3 I
`1.90
`1.69
`5.14
`2.09
`
`Grains/unit
`length
`8.50
`7.86
`9.60
`8.8 I
`'039
`9'03
`8.40
`9.0 I
`1078
`10.80
`21.38
`12.74
`947
`10.97
`I 1-89
`15.75
`1026
`13'92
`I O . 0 8
`9'09
`631
`I 3.0 I
`8.94
`7'65
`z = 10.61
`u = 3.06
`
`Grains per
`unit length
`
`4 ;;I
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
` -
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`
`
`I1
`12
`Chromosome
`Fig. 1. Distribution of grains per unit chromosome length (1 Yo of the genome). The dotted line indicates
`the grains expected if grains are randomly distributed.
`
`.-- 1
`
`13
`
`14
`
`I9 20 21
`
`22
`
`X
`
`Y
`
`

`
`138
`
`S. MALCOLM AND OTHERS
`
`Number
`of grains .
`18-
`
`16-
`
`I2-
`
`10- ':I
`14- r
`
`2
`
`L
`
`P
`
`
`
`Fig. 2. Distribution of grains along chromosome 1 1 . The arrow indicates the position of the centromere.
`p and q represent short and long arms respectively. The chromosome was divided into ten equal-sized
`segments.
`
`diploid genome (Fig. 1). A calculation of the grains/unit length expected if all the observed
`grains were due to random background has been carried out by dividing the total number of
`grains by the total number of length units. This value is shown as a dotted line in Fig. 1.
`Chromosome 11 shows twice as much hybridization per unit length as would be expected if
`all the grains were distributed randomly (see Fig. 1) and no other chromosome shows anything
`approaching this level of hybridization. When the grains/unit length for all the chromosomes
`are analysed the value for chromosome 11 falls outside 3-5 standard deviations from the average
`(see Table l), making it extremely unlikely that this is a chance value. No other chromosome
`falls significantly away from the mean although chromosome 16 shows hybridization somewhat
`above background and is the next most heavily labelled chromosome. As expected, the smaller
`chromosomes, which represent a smaller proportion of the total counts, differ more from the
`average than the larger chromosomes.
`
`Distribution of silver grains along chromosome 11
`The distribution of silver grains along the length of chromosome 11 was analysed and is shown
`in Fig. 2. The chromosome was arbitrarily divided into ten equal units and these units merely
`represent the resolution with which we are able to assign grains and do not represent cytogenetic
`bands. Fig. 2 shows that there is a marked concentration of grains adjacent to the centromerc
`in the short (p) arm of the chromosome. All other parts of chromosome 11 show hybridization
`close to the background level expected for random distribution.
`
`

`
`Chromosomal localization of a single copy gene by in situ hybridization
`
`139
`
`Eficiency of hybridization
`It is possible to make an estimate of the number of grains that would be expected after 40
`days exposure for a locus of 4.4 kb present as a single copy and labelled to the specific activity
`used by comparison with known grain counts for the 185 and 285 ribosomal RNA genes in man.
`The ribosomal genes are distributed amongst five chromosomes in man, and as there are
`approximately 50 copies of the ribosomal genes per haploid genome (Young, Hell & Birnie, 1976)
`on average there will be ten copies per chromosomal nucleolar organizer locus, or 70 kb DNA
`sequence. In control experiments we find 1-2 grains per nucleolar organizer after 1 week’s
`exposure for this specific activity cRNA probe from a ribosomal gene recombinant. For the
`globin gene sequence 44 kb in length, we would expect approximately 0 5 grains per chromosomal
`locus after 40 days exposure. Since a total of 55 cells (1 10 chromosome 1 1 s) were scored, a total
`of 55 grains above background would be expected by comparison with the ribosomal gene locus.
`Using the background calculated from all other chromosomes, there is an excess of 47 grains
`over chromosome 11 in the total number of 55 cells, in close agreement with the predicted value.
`
`DISCUSSION
`Human ribosomal genes may be readily detected using short exposure times by in situ
`hybridization and this has proved useful for gene localization and the study of variants (Salmasi
`et al. 1980; Elliott et al. 1980). As an NOR contains on average 70 kb of ribosomal DNA and
`the average mRNA only 1 kb or less it seemed that this method would not be generally
`applicable to the localization of single copy structural genes. It could be calculated that about
`5 kb of hybridizing sequence would give on average 0 5 grains/chromosome under the conditions
`of overall efficiency achieved in in situ hybridization. This is clearly not enough grains to be
`obvious on visual inspection of one cell but should be quite clear if data are pooled from a large
`number of cells.
`The advent of recombinant clones derived from the chromosome rather than from mRNA
`enables fragments of DNA, around 5 kb long, specific to the structural gene but containing
`intervening and adjacent sequences, to be used as a hybridization probe and therefore allows
`structural genes also to be detected by this method. We have used such a fragment, 4.4 kb long,
`to localize the /3 globia gene to the short arm of chromosome 11 close to the centromere, in
`agreement with results of chromosome sorting experiments (Lebo et al. 1979) and somatic cell
`hybrids (Jeffreys, Craig & Francke, 1979; Scott, Phillips & Migeon, 1979).
`Although nick-translated plasmid DNA may be used directly for hybridization and will in
`fact result in an enhancement of signal due to the formation of cross-linked molecules (Malcolm
`et al. 1977), we decided to use a complementary RNA transcribed from the plasmid DNA
`template by E. Coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase because the higher specific activity and
`the lower background produced by mild RNAase treatment make this more suitable for
`detecting very low levels of grains. We have found in experiments involving ribosomal and highly
`repeated sequences that no differences are found when native or heat-denatured DNA is used
`as the template and therefore there is no specificity of transcription. This is probably because
`the E . Coli RNA polymerase used has only a partial content of u sub-unit. We have also shown
`directly that the whole length of the inserted sequence is transcribed under these conditions
`by hybridization of aS2P-labelled cRNA to filters containing restricted plasmid DNA (data not
`
`

`
`140
`
`S. MALCOLM AND OTHERS
`presented). Chromosome morphology is considerably damaged during the denaturation and
`hybridization procedures and so it is essential for accurate identification that the chromosomes
`should be banded and photographed before in situ hybridization.
`The significance of the slight excess of grains found on chromosome 16 is not understood.
`Although the number of grains involved is very small, it is most striking that the grains are
`clustered in the centre of the short arm. The a cluster of globin genes are located on this
`chromosome (Deisseroth et al. 1977) but their exact position is unknown and it is possible that
`this method is picking up related sequences found near both globin clusters.
`As this method of detection relies on hybridization of sequences surrounding the globin gene
`as well as the structural gene itself, it is important that these sequences should be conserved
`between individuals. Although the agreement of restriction maps of the j3 globin gene cluster
`produced in many different laboratories throughout the world shows that there are very few,
`if any, major rearrangements in normal individuals, Jeffreys (1979) has shown restriction
`enzyme site polymorphisms resulting from a single base change. These seem to be particularly
`common in non-translated intervening sequences. These single base changes will not affect
`hybridization.
`This method should be extendable to any sequence for which a single copy probe containing
`at least 5 kb of DNA is available. It is not even necessary for the probe t o contain the gene
`sequence itself and, in fact, for multiple gene families such as actin, this may prove a great
`advantage. As highly repeated sequences are found close to structural genes Southern blot
`analysis and blotting using total DNA as a hybridization probe (Fritsch, Lawn & Maniatis, 1980)
`would be necessary to show that any particular fragment was suitable for in situ hybridization.
`Previous attempts to locate structural genes by in situ hybridization (Price, Conover &
`Hirschhorn, 1972) used either low specific activity mRNA or complementary DNA copies and,
`as pointed out here and elsewhere (Bishop & Jones, 1972), the length of the probes used and
`their specific activity made the experiments theoretically impossible. Clearly any gene localization
`using in situ hybridization must show, as in this paper, the overall efficiency of hybridization
`and detection. A possible source of confusion in the early experiments was that total mRNA
`was used and this may have contained some repetitive sequences. The use of well-characterized
`cloned probes removes any possibilities of such contamination.
`
`This work was supported by the Medical Research Council. We are most grateful to Dr Tom Maniatis for
`making HPIS available and to Dr E. Boyd for assistance with karyotyping.
`
`REFERENCES
`BERNARDS, R., LITTLE, P. F. R., ANNISON, G., WILLIAMSON, R. t FLAVELL, R. A. (1979). Structure of the
`human Gy-Ay-S-P-globin gene lous. Proc. Natn. A c d . Sei. U.S.A. 76, 4827.
`BISHOP, J . 0. t JONES, K. W. (1972). Chromosomal localization ufhuman haemoglobin structural genes. Nature,
`Lond. 240, 149.
`CHANDLER, M. E., KEDES, L. H., COHN, R. H. t YUNIS, J. Y. (1979). Genes coding for histone proteins in man
`are located on the distal end of the long arm of chromosome 7. Science, N. Y . 205, 908.
`DEISSEROTH, A., NIENHUIS, A,, TURNER, P., VELEZ, R., ANDERSON, W. F., RUDDLE, F., LAWRENCE, J.,
`CREAGAN, R. t KUCHERLAPATI, R. (1977). Localisation of the human a-globin structural gene to chromosome
`16 in somatic cell hybrids by molecular hybridisation assay. Celt? 12, 205.
`ELLIOTT, T., BOYD, E., MALCOLM, S., AITKEN, D. A. t FEROUSON-SMITH, M. A. (1980). A familial variant of
`human chromosome 9 bearing a nucleolus organiser region. Heredity 45, 156.
`EVANS, H. J., BUCKLAND, R. A. t PARDUE, M. L. (1974). Location of the genes codingfor 18s and 28s ribosomal
`RNA in the human genome. Chromosoma 48, 405.
`
`

`
`141
`
`Chromosomal localization of a single copy gene by in situ hybridization
`M. A. (1979). Use of chromosomal
`FENNELL, S. J . , MALCOLM, S., WILLIAMSON, R. & FERGUSON-SMITH,
`translocations with in situ DNA hybridisation to confirm localisation of human 5s ribosomal RNA genes.
`.I. Mad. Genet. 16, 246.
`FERGUSON-SMITH, M. A. (1974). Techniques of human chromosome analysis. La Ricerca Clin. Lab. 4, 297.
`FRITSCH, E. F., LAWN, R. M. & MANIATIS, T. (1980). Molecular cloning and characterisation of the human P
`like globin gene cluster. Cell 19, 959.
`A. J. (1979). DNA sequence variants in the Gy *Y 6 and P-globin genes of man. Ce2l 18, 1.
`JEVFREYS,
`A. J., CRAIG, I. W. & FRANKE, U. (1979). Localisation of the GyAy S and P-globin genes on the short
`JEFFREYS,
`arm of chromosome 11. Nature, Lond. 281, 606.
`JONES, K. W. (1974). The method of in situ hybridisation. In New Techniques in Biophysics and Cell Biology
`(ed. R. H. Pain and B. J. Smith), p. 29. New York: John Wiley.
`LAWN, R. M.,FRITscH,E. F.,PARKER,R. C.,BLAKE,G.&MANIATIS,T.
`(1978).Theisolationandcharacterisation
`of linked 6 and P globin genes from a cloned library of human DNA. Cell 15, 1157.
`LEBO, R. V., CARRANO, A. V., BURKHAN-SCHULTZ, K., DOZY, A. M., Yu, L. C. & KAN, Y. W. (1979). Assignment
`of human /3, y and 6 globin genes to the short arm of chromosome 11 by chromosome sorting and DNA
`restriction analysis. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 5804.
`MALCOLM, S., WILLIAMSON, R., BOYD, E. & FERGUSON-SMITH, M. A. (1977). A comparison of in, situ
`hybridisation techniques for gene localisation. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 19, 256.
`PRICE, P. M., CONOVER, J . H. & HIRSCHHORN, K. (1972). Chromosomal localisation of human haemoglobin
`structural genes. Nature, Lond. 237, 340.
`SALMASI, A. M., MALCOLM, S., ELLIOTT, T., WILLIAMSON, R., & FERGUSON-SMITH, M. A. (1980). Nucleolus-
`organiser regions in familial extra metacentric human chromosomes. Heredity 44, 63.
`SCOTT, A. F., PHILLIPS, J. A,, & MIGEON, B. R. (1979). DNA restriction endonuclease analysis for localisation
`of human P and S globin genes on chromosome 11. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 4563.
`STEFFENSEN, D. M., PRENSKY, W., MTJTTON, D. & HAMERTON, J. L. (1975). Mapping the human 55 RNA genes
`on chromosome 1 using translocations. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 14, 434.
`YOUNG, B. D., HELL, A. & BIRNIE, G. D. (1976). A new estimate of human ribosomal gene number. Biochim.
`Biophys. Acta 454, 539.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket