throbber
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 311,205 - 218 (1980) Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology (cid:14)9 by Springer-Verlag 1980 Stimulant and Depressant Effects of/~-Adrenoceptor Blocking Agents on Isolated Heart Muscle A Positive Inotropic Effect not Mediated Through Adrenoceptors A. J. Kaumann* and J. R. Blinks Department of Pharmacology, Mayo Medical School, Rochester, Minnesota 5590i, USA Summary. The chronotropic and inotropic effects of fourteen/?-adrenoceptor blocking agents were studied in vitro on preparations of isolated heart muscle from kittens and guinea pigs. Most of the agents exert negative inotropic and chronotropic effects that in- crease rapidly with concentration above 10-6M. Exceptions are the closely related compounds practolol and atenolol, which have minimal depressant effects in concentrations as high as 2 x 10 .3 M. Dose-response relations for the depressant effects are similar for pacemaker frequency and for tension development in atrial and papillary muscle. The cardiodepressant ef- fects of /?-blockers are non-stereospecific and are apparently unrelated to the actions of the drugs at /?-adrenoceptors. Many/?-blockers exert positive ino- tropic and chronotropic effects at concentrations lower than those that depress. The stimulant effects are slow in onset and do not fade. In most instances these effects are blocked by propranolol and may therefore be con- sidered to be mediated through/?-adrenoceptors; (-)- enantiomers are more potent than (+)-enantiomers as adrenoceptor stimulants. Adrenoceptor-mediated ino- tropic effects are usually more pronounced in atrial than in ventricular muscle. Certain/?-blockers, notably INPEA and sotalol, exert positive inotropic effects that are not blocked by propranolol or phenoxybenzamine. The effects are very slow in onset and offset, and are accompanied by the development of contractions with a late tonic component which coincides with a greatly prolonged action potential. Unlike the adrenoceptor- mediated effect, the non-sympathomimetic inotropic effect is more pronounced in ventricular than in atrial muscle, and is not stereospecific. Pindolol also causes the development of a late tonic component, but the accompanying positive inotropic effect is overcome by the simultaneous development of the depressant action of the drug. Send offprint requests to J. R. Blinks at the address above * Present address: Physiologisches Institut der Universit~it, Lehr- stuhl fiir Klinische Physiologie, 4000 Dfisseldorf, Universit/its- strasse i, Federal Republic of Germany Key words: Beta adrenoceptor blockers - Heart rate - Myocardial contraction - Papillary muscle - Heart atrium. Introduction The past twenty years have seen the introduction of a large number of new/?-adrenoceptor blocking agents, most of which have been reported to have effects significantly different in some respect from those of their predecessors. During much of this time a continu- ing interest in cardiac adrenoceptors has led us to examine certain properties of many of these com- pounds as they became available. It is, of course, widely recognized that many/?-adrenoceptor blocking agents have both stimulant and depressant effects on the heart (e.g., Fleming and Hawkins, 1960; Ablad et al., 1967; Barrett and Carter, 1970). Nonetheless, there has been uncertainty and even misinformation about certain aspects of these effects. The antagonism of sympathetic influences has sometimes been confused with the di- rectly depressant actions of the drugs (Koch-Weser, 1965). The transient stimulation observed during the onset of action of high concentrations of drugs with biphasic dose-response curves has at times been mis- taken for a truly fading drug response. There have been conflicting reports as to whether the stimulant effects of certain/?-blockers are direct or mediated through the release of endogeneous norepinephrine (e.g., Dhalla, 1967; Barrett and Carter, 1970). Divergent impressions about the relative prominence of the stimulant effects of various/?-blockers have resulted from the comparison of stimulant effects in different tissues or in different species. The experiments reported in this paper were prompted by our need to have clear information about these matters before we could proceed with a more quantitative analysis of the actions of the compounds in question. An unexpected bonus was the discovery that certain/?-blockers increase the strength of myocardial 0028-1298/80/0311/0205/$ 02.80
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1035-1
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`206 Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 311 (1980) contraction by an unusual and previously unsuspected mechanism. Methods Preparations. Experimentswere carried out on tissues from the hearts of kittens (body weight 300-1400 g) and guinea pigs (body weight 180-900 g) of both sexes. After the animals had been lightly anesthetized with chloroform (kittens) or killed by a blow on the head (guinea pigs), their chests were opened quickly, and the hearts perfused briefly through the inferior vena cava or ventricular stab wouhds to clear them of blood. The hearts were then removed and dissected quickly in a shallow dish of freshly oxygenated physiologi- cal salt solution at room temperature (20-22~ Spontaneously beating right atria and quiescent left atrial strips were prepared from both species; thin papillary muscles were also removed from the right ventricles of the kitten hearts. The preparations were mounted, usually in pairs, in one or more units of an apparatus described previously (Blinks, 1965) in which their isometric contractions could be recorded, The muscles were suspended vertically, clamped at the bottom to an electrode holder and tied at the top to stainless steel wire hooks suspended from Statham type G7 strain gauge tension Transducers. Records were made with a Sanborn model 154100B oscillograph equipped with 150 1100 AS carrier preamplifiers. The left atrial strips, which were cut from the outer surface of the left atrial appendage, were roughly triangular, approximately 5 mm wide at the base and 1 cm long from base to apex. They were clamped at the base and connected to the transducer hook with a short piece of cotton thread tied at the apex. The thinnest available papillary muscles were selected; in no case did we use muscles more than 1 mm thick. The papillary muscles were also clamped at the base and were attached to the transducer hook with a thread tied to the corda tendinea. Left atrial strips or papillary muscles that became spontaneously active were usually reclamped or trimmed in an attempt to remove the focus of spontaneous discharge; if this failed, the preparations were discarded. The atrial strips and papillary muscles were driven with square-wave pulses of 5 ms duration delivered through a punctate cathode in contact with the tissue at the level of the damp; the anode was a large platinum wire distant fiom the tissue. Stimuli only barely over threshold voltage (ca. 250 mV for papillary muscles; ca.1 V for atria[ strips) were used so that the release of endogenous norepineph- rine by the driving stimuli would be minimized (Blinks, 1966, 1967). Left atrial strips were driven at 2-s intervals; papillary muscles at 5-s intervals. To avoid changes in frequency due to stretch of the pacemaker (see Blinks, 1956), the spontaneously beating right atria were suspended between a clamp on the inferior vena cava and a thread tied to the free margin of the atrial appendage; resting tension was set no higher than was necessary to count the contractions on the oscillograph record (about 100 mg). Rough length-tension curves were determined for the driven preparations as soon as they had become reasonably stable. Papillary muscles were then left at the Iength associated with maximal tension deveIopment (L~J. At Lma ~ the resting tension of atrial strips was very high and tended to creep downward with time. For this reason the atrial strips were set to a length at which the resting tension was approximately half that at Lm~. Experiments were carried out at 32.5~ in a physiological salt solution containing (mM) Na + 140, K + 5, Ca -~ + 2.25, Mg 2 + 1.0, CI 98.5, SOl- 1.0, HCO~- 29, H2PO 2 2, acetate 201, glucose 10. The solution was made up in glass-distilled water, and equilibrated with 95 % 02 - 5 % CO 2. The organ bath contained 50 ml of the solution. Many of the earlier experiments were carried out in a solution that contained 10 mM fumarate, 5 mM pyruvate, and 5 mM (L)-glutamate instead of 20 mM acetate. A series of experiments on the effects of catecholamines revealed no differences in the behavior of the tissues in the two solutions Drugs. Racemic mixtures of fourteen/3-adrenoceptor blocking agents were studied. These agents (structural formulae are shown in Fig. 1) and their sources are: propranolo[, I CI-Ayerst; bupranolol (KL 255), Sanol; K6 592, Boehringer Ingelheim; pronethalol (nethalide), ICI- Ayerst; alprenolol (H 56/28), H/issle-Astra; oxprenolol (39089-Ba), CIBA; pindolol (SB 46), Sandoz; practoIol, ICI-Ayerst; H 87/07, H/issle-Astra; atenolol (IC[ 66082), ICI; sotalol (MJ 1999), Mead- Johnson; N-isopropylmethoxamine, Burroughs Wellcome; INPEA, SeIvi; dichloroisoproterenol (DCI), Lilly. A1] of these substances were used as hydrochloride salts except for pindolol and practoloI, which were supplied as the base and dissolved as the tartrate and acetate, respectively. In addition, the separate optical isomers (enantiomers) of bupranolol, alprenolol, oxprenolol, and INPEA, and the (+) isomer of propranolol were used, all as the hydrochloride salts. Other drugs used were (-)-isoproterenol bitartrate (Sterling- Winthrop) ((-)-isoprenaline), reserpine phosphate (CIBA), and phenoxybenzamine hydrochloride (Smith Kline & French). Except for reserpine and phenoxybenzamine, the drugs were made up in aqueous stock solutions (10-1 or 10 -z M) which were kept in capped vials in a dark refrigerator. The stock solution of isoproterenol was acidified with HC1 to pH approximately 3 at the time it was made up. In order to retard the oxidation of the catecholamine, we added ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, disodium salt (EDTA), 0.04 raM, to the physiological salt solution whenever isoproterenol was to be used (see e.g., Blinks and Koch-Weser, 1963). Phenoxybenzamine was dissolved in a stock solution (10 -2 M) of 95 % ethanol. Reserpine was dissolved in water from a lyophilized powder at the time of administration and was injected (5 mg/kg subcutaneously in kittens; 10 mg/kg intraperitoneally in guinea pigs) 20 - 26 h before the experiment. Concentrations ofaI1 other drugs are expressed as the molar concentration in contact with the tissue. The effectiveness of reserpine pretreatment was checked routinely by subjecting a left atrial strip or papillary muscle from each reserpine- treated animal to high-frequency field stimulation (Blinks, 1966) at the start of the experiment. No evidence of norepinephrine release was ever detected. Dose-response curves were determined by the cumulative ad- dition of drugs, usually in increments that increased the successive concentrations in steps of approximately 0.5 log unit. The time that each concentration was allowed to act was governed as follows. If a particular dose of a drug produced no effect within 10 min, the effect was recorded as zero, and the next dose was added. [f a particular dose produced stimulation, that effect was allowed to develop maximally no matter how much time was required. Ira dose produced depression, the effect was followed untiI either a steady state had been achieved or 30 rain had elapsed, tf the frequency or force was still declining 30 rain after a dose had been added, the measurements were recorded at that time and the next dose was added. This arbitrary procedure was adopted because in the presence of high con- centrations of some drugs the performance of the preparations appeared to decline without ever reaching a steady state. Results Dose-Response Curves for Inotropic and Chronotropic Effects of B-Blockers. The stimulant and depressant effects of the various/~-blockers were studied primarily on isolated tissues from the kitten heart because the onset of action of the compounds was generally slow and these preparations exhibit greater long-term in- otropic stability than those from other common labo- ratory animals (A. Clark and J. R. Blinks, unpublished observations). Furthermore, the kitten heart is highly sensitive to the stimulant actions of partial agonists
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1035-2
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`A. J. Kaumann and J. R. Blinks : Intrinsic Effects of/~-Blockers on Heart Muscle 207 acting on the/?-adrenoceptor (see below). Cumulative concentration-effect curves for the racemic mixtures of fourteen/?-blockers are shown in Fig. 1. Each of the fourteen panels shows mean dose-response curves for the effects of one drug on the frequency of contraction of right atria and on the tension developed by papillary muscles and left atrial strips. All measurements are expressed as percentages of the initial value for the preparation in question. Most of the/?-blockers studied produced marked depressant effects in concentrations above 10 -6 or 10 -5 M. These negative inotropic and chronotropic effects usually increased steeply with concentration, leading in most cases to arrest or inexcitability of the preparation at concentrations between 10 -4 and 10- a M. Significant exceptions were practolol and the closely related compound atenolol, which had virtually no depressant effect at any of the concentrations tested (up to 2 (cid:141) 10 3 M). The dose-response curves for the negative inotropic and negative chronotropic effects of most of the agents were strikingly similar, considering the disparate nature of the responses being measured. When marked stimulation occurred (see below) it tended to increase somewhat the concentration at which frequency or force first fell below the control level. Most of the compounds tested exerted positive inotropic and chronotropic effects in concentrations below those that caused depression. Of the fourteen antagonists studied, only three (bupranolol, atenolol, and N-isopropylmethoxamine) were apparently free of stimulant effects on the kitten heart. The stimulant effects of propranolol were minimal, but definitely present. They were most clearly apparent when con- centrations between 10-7 and 10-6 M were added to previously unexposed preparations that had been al- lowed to stabilize thoroughly. Under these conditions slight (<5~) positive chronotropic and inotropic effects could usually be detected in atrial muscle (exam- ples are shown in Blinks, 1967, Figs. 1A and 2). No such stimulation was ever observed when bupranolol was added under similar circumstances. With the notable exception of sotalol the/?-blockers tended to have more pronounced inotropic effects on atrial strips than on papillary muscles. The extent of this difference was quite variable, however, as is particularly apparent from a comparison of the effects of practolol (Fig. IA) and dichloroisoproterenol (Fig. 1B). Time Course of Stimulation and Depression. The onset of the stimulant effects of/?-adrenoceptor blocking agents was characteristically slower than that of cat- echolamines. All concentrations of catecholamines produced their full effects on our preparations within 3 - 10 min. Though explicit studies of the time course of onset were not made for all /~-blockers, some infor- mation on speed of onset was obtained during the determination of the cumulative dose-response curves shown in Fig. 1. In most cases the full stimulant effect was achieved within 10 - 20 min after each increment in concentration. The onset of action of DC1 was partic- ularly slow, especially when low concentrations were used. Thirty minutes or more were sometimes required for the attainment of full effect. A number of experi- ments were performed in which the onset and per- sistence of the stimulant effects of various single concentrations of several {/-blockers could be followed. When the tissues were exposed to concentrations of the drugs lower than those producing maximum stimu- lation, there never was any indication of fade - that is, once the maximum effect had been achieved, it per- sisted as long as the tissue was exposed to the drug. High concentrations (those above the level producing maximum stimulation) produced a biphasic response, but this may be presumed to reflect the onset of the de- pressant effect of high concentrations of the drugs, and not a fading response in the true sense. Similarly, the development of the stimulant effect of high concen- trations of the drugs may appear artificially fast be- cause it is cut short by the onset of depression. Figure 2 illustrates the time course of the stimulant effects of two concentrations of DC1 - one submaximal and one supermaximal. The onset of the depressant effects of the /?-blockers was characteristically gradual, and sometimes was still progressing slowly at the end of the arbitrary 30-min period between doses adopted for this part of the dose-response curve (see Methods). Species Differences. The maximum chronotropic (Fig. 3, upper panel) and inotropic (see Kaumann and Blinks, 1980) effects of DCI were only slightly less than those ofisoproterenol itself, while the depressant effects of high concentrations of DCI were much more pro- nounced. These findings are in contrast to those of Fleming and Hawkins (1960), who found that the maximal chronotropic effects of DCI in guinea pig atria were no more than about 30 ~ of those of epinephrine. Because we were interested in finding conditions under which the blocking actions of the various antagonists could be studied with as little interference as possible from stimulant effects, we repeated the comparison between isoproterenol and DCI on guinea-pig atria. The results, shown in the lower panel of Fig. 3, were strikingly different from those in the kitten, and similar to those reported by Fleming and Hawkins. The comparison between the effects of/?-blockers in guinea pigs and kittens was then extended to include most of the agents under study. Dose-response curves for racemic mixtures of propranolol, oxprenolol, pindolol, alprenolol, sotalol, INPEA, H 87/07, and N-isopropyl-
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1035-3
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`80 40 13 ..~ 0 120 "6 80 40 Lu 0 LU 120 a.. (b .M LU 80 Lu C~ 40 0:: ~- 0 160 LU LU 120 LL 80 40 I0 9 8 7 6 5 4 5 9 8 7 6 5 4 5 2 ~KBKB I I ~" ~ I I K I T I I ~, I ~ I ... RA o (5) O-CH2-CH'CH2-NH-I I ~H -NH- o (4) 40 "'~ hh, C~o ~,~ ~ ', izo + .. o(5)] (_+) 80 -~ (cid:12)9 (6) ~,\ "~)1 O~CHz-CH-CH2-NH-~H Q (SJ CHz-;H-CH2-NH- , , , . ~H, I\~ .(5; 40 CH3. - H-CH2-NH-CH o _(.-+) Alprenolol ~ I - O-CH2-CH-CH2-NH-CH O-CH -CH-CH~-NH-CH I o (4) ~ I I o (4) 40 _ CH ~ .UO) ~H ,(r). KB 120 -t- ' o (4) - ( (cid:12)9 (e) 80 -% .,,, " - O-CHz-CH-CHz-NH-CH _ 40 I I N H o (6) (cid:12)9 (10) C=O (cid:12)9 (8) 0 H ~ , ,__I i , I clip I I , I I i JO 9 8 T 6 5 4 3 9 8 T 6 5 4 3 2 I0 9 8 7 6 5 4 5 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 bJ oo F R~A~ (;) KB ~1' ' I (+--)~Afeno,;I ..... I PM (cid:12)9 (0) V" ' \ I ' leo t- ,/.~'f'. - ~ \ \ | O-C,2-C,-C,~-N,-~, ~" 80~- ( )H87/07 i\ ~ |, ~ ,(4) I c~ (cid:12)9 ~ 9- -O-C,~-C,-C,~-NH-~, /~,~ (4) ~ o (3) Methoxomine I 3 40 IZO CI CH~ .ol o. .... \\ \l .o 0 ~ ~ ~ I ~ie~l,L~ 0 A --LOG MOLAR CONCENTRATION Fig. 1A and B. Stimulant and depressant effects of racemic mixtures of fourteen/~-adrenoceptor blocking agents on kitten cardiac muscle. Cumulative concentration-effect curves determined at 32.5 ~ for the agents identified in the respective panels. All measurements are expressed as mean percentages of the control frequency or force in the same preparation; vertical lines indicate SEM.Numbers of experiments are indicated by figures in parentheses in each panel. No preparation wasusedformore than one curve. Symbols: (cid:14)9 Frequency ofspontaneouslybeating right atria; I, tension developed by left atrial strips driven at 2-s intervals ; I, tension developed by papillary muscles driven at 5-s intervals. Stimuli were of threshold strength; threshold usually increased during the phase of depression. K B indicates apparent equilibrium constant for blockade of chronotropic effects of isoproterenol taken from Kaumann et al. (1980) or Kaumann and Blinks (1980) I0 9 8 F 6 5 4 3 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 g -LOG MOLAR CONCENTRATION > g F m" s t~J
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1035-4
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`A. J. Kaumann and J. R. Blinks: Intrinsic Effects of fi-Blockers on Heart Muscle 209 Fig. 2. Responses to sub- and supermaximally effective concentrations of dichloroisoproterenol. Two left atrial strips from the same kitten were set up in separate baths at 32.5 ~ they were driven with threshold pulses at 2-s intervals, and isometric contractions were recorded concurrently. At the time indicated by the arrows, ( +)-DCI was added to give a concentration of 5 x 10- s M in strip A, and 10- 7 M in strip B. Tracings A and B in the lower panel are continuations of the corresponding ones in the upper panel / ,,'/ ~ "*,, " x . _j &Ix \ 80 ~ 4~. ~ (cid:12)9 (--) Isoproferenol (6) \ ~ | x (+_.) Dichloroisoproterenol (8) A\ \ oL.I I I I I I I I 4xl I F 11 I0 9 8 7 6 5 4 5 2 3.- 240 ~/~ ~ Q~ 160 ~0 | GUINEA PIG (5) x C9) L I I0 9 Bosol I I I I I ~sx I I 8 7 6 5 4 .5 2 Frequency -LOG MOLAR CONCENTRATION Fig. 3. Species difference in the relative chronotropic effects of isoproterenol and dichloroisoproterenol. Cumulative concentration- effect curves for (-)-isoproterenol (O) and (+_)-dichloroisoprote- renol (x) determined at 32.5 ~ on spontaneously beating right atria of kittens (upper panel) and guinea pigs (lower panel). Symbols indicate mean + SEM of absolute frequencies of contraction. Numbers of experiments indicated by figures in parentheses except where in- dicated by figures beside symbols. Only one curve was determined on a given preparation methoxamine were determined on spontaneously beat- ing guinea-pig right atria. The negative chronotropic effects of high concentrations of all of these compounds were very similar to those in kitten atria. The positive chronotropic effects were uniformly less pronounced than in kitten atria, however. (Dose-response curves for the stimulant effects are shown in a companion paper - Kaumann and Blinks, 1980.) Only DCI and H 87/07 increased the frequency of contraction of guinea-pig atria by more than 5 ~o. Although full inotropic dose- response curves for only a few of the/?-blockers were determined on guinea-pig atria, we had the opportunity to observe the inotropic effects of various individual concentrations of most of the /~-blockers during the course of other experiments. The results were generally consistent with the low level of stimulation seen in guinea-pig right atria. Significantly, however, high concentrations of sotalol produced a clear positive inotropic effect in guinea-pig left atrial strips (experi- ments not shown). Influence of Propranolol on Stimulation. Whenever any of the ]3-adrenoceptor blocking agents was found to increase the frequency or force of contraction of a preparation by 10 ~ or more, the dose-response curve was redetermined in the presence of 10-6M (+)- propranolol. (Only a single dose-response curve was
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1035-5
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`210 Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 311 (1980) RIGHT ATRIUM 160120 80~ (+_) Practolol L ~ (6) r3 ~ o ~'~ 120 80 Cb 4O o Lu ck Q) 120 ..4 (b 40 N. s o Q~ 160 bJ - (+-) A tprenotol o (5) (cid:141) P(2) LEFT ATRIUM _ Jf x--x~_ -- ((cid:127) Practolol o (tO) o (4) J~ i i I i i i (?) Alpreootol (+) Oxprenolol \\ -r o (4) (+_) Oxprenolol P (3) I\ o {5) P (3) 40 0 " (+-) Pindofol \~ (-+) Pindolot o (4) ~\ o (6) x P (2) P (2) s 8 7" 6 5 4 5 9 8 I 6 5 4 3 -LOG MOLAR CONCENTRATION Fig. 4 Influence of propranolol on the stimulation of kitten atria by fi-blockers. Cumulative dose-response curves determined and plotted as in Fig. 1, except that results from right and left atria are presented in separate panels and no experiments on papillary muscles were performed. (The drugs in this group produced little or no positive inotropic effect in the kitten papillary muscle.) Symbols: O, control atria; x, atria exposed to 10 -6 M ( _+ )-propranolol (P) for 45 - 60 min before, and during determination of the dose-response curve. Only one dose- response curve was determined on a given preparation determined on any given preparation.) The results are shown in Figs. 4-7. None of the depressant actions was appreciably influenced by propranolol. In most cases the stimulant effect was shifted to much higher concentration levels or abolished altogether in the presence of propranolol. For substances acting on the fi-adrenoceptor, the concentration (10 .6 M) ofpropra- nolol (-log K B = 8.5, Kaumann et al., 1980) used would be expected to shift the dose-response curve by a factor of approximately 300. In those cases where the stimulant and depressant concentrations of a drug were separated by a factor of less than 300, the 2.5 log unit displacement of the curve for stimulation shifted it wholly into the range of concentrations producing profound depression and the stimulant effect was entirely obscured. If the stimulant and depressant concentrations were separated initially by a factor of more than 300, the stimulant effect of the/Y-blocker was still apparent after propranolol, and the dose-response curve was shifted by approximately the predicted 2.5 log units. The positive inotropic effect of sotalol on the cat papillary muscle was uninfluenced by propranolol, and that of INPEA was reduced only slightly (Fig. 7). It was therefore concluded that these effects were either partly (INPEA) or wholly (sotalol) the product of mechanisms that do not involve the fi-adrenocep- tor. Lack of lnfluen ce of Reserp ine Pre trea tmen t. The re sults with propranolol indicate that most of the stimulant effects of fi-blockers are mediated through the fi-adrenoceptor. They do not clearly distinguish, how- ever, between a direct effect of the fi-blocker itself on the fl-adrenoceptor (i.e., fl-blocker acting as a partial agonist) and an indirect (tyramine-like) effect mediated through the release of endogenous norepinephrine. We repeated the dose-response curves for the racemic mixtures of DCI, pronethalol, H 87/07, and INPEA in tissues from kittens (Fig. 5) and of DCI in guinea-pig atria (Fig. 6) after reserpine pretreatment. In no case were the responses significantly different from those in normal tissues. Because other evidence was not con- sistent with an indirect mechanism (see Discussion), we did not consider the question of indirect stimulant actions worth further pursuit.
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1035-6
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`A. J. Kaumann and J. R. Blinks: Intrinsic Effects of/~-Blockers on Heart Muscle 211 2 "6 o 13 LL RIGHT ATRIUM LEFT ATRIUM PAPILLARY MUSCLE 120 ~_ 80 o (3J (cid:12)9 R (2) 40 *P(IJ o ~ i i J 80 (cid:12)9 R (37 x P (4) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 120 80 40 (+--) H 87/07 o (4J (cid:12)9 R(4J xP/2J o (5I (cid:12)9 R (2) xP(2) i R(2) (cid:141) P (SJ ,iii' \ 9 8 7 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 4 -LOG MOLAR CONCENTRATION Fig. 5. Influence of propranolol and reserpine pretreatment on the stimulation of kitten heart muscle by/~-blockers. Cumulative dose- response curves determined and plotted as in Fig. I except that results from different tissue are presented in separate panels. Symbols: (cid:14)9 tissues from untreated animals; i, tissues from kittens pretreated with reserpine (R) (5 mg/kg i.p. 20-24 h before death); x, tissues exposed to 10 -6 M (+)-propranolol (P) for 45-60 min before and during determination of the dose-response curve. Only one dose- response curve was determined on a given preparation; numbers of experiments indicated by figures in parentheses Non-Sympathomimetic Stimulation and a Late Tonic Component of Contraction As was noted above, the positive inotropic effect of sotalol on the kitten papillary muscle was uninfluenced by propranolol, and that of INPEA was only slightly reduced (Fig. 7). To rule out the possibility that this stimulant effect might be mediated through alpha adrenoceptors, we also determined inotropic dose- response curves for sotalol on kitten papillary muscles 120 80 e~ u~ 4o 0 (5) L (cid:12)9 R(4) X P(4) O - I t t t I J 8 7 6 5 4 3 - LOG MOLAR [(-+) DICHLOROISOPROTERENOL] Fig. 6. Influence of propranolol and reserpine pretreatment on the positive chronotropic effect of ((cid:127) in right atria of guinea pigs. Conditions and symbols as in Fig. 5 except that reserpine-pretreated animals (R) received 10 mg/kg i.p. and 60 rain was allowed for equilibration with propranolol (P)_ Only one dose- response curve was determined on a given preparation; numbers of experiments indicated by figures in parentheses incubated with 5 x ]0 .6 M phenoxybenzamine. The results were not significantly different from those obtained in untreated muscles or muscles exposed to propranolol (Fig. 7). The fact that propranolol reduced the inotropic effect of low concentrations of INPEA suggests that there may be a /Lreceptor-mediated component in its effect on the papillary muscle, as there clearly was in the atrium (see Fig. 5). However, the maximum inotropic effect was not changed by pro- pranolol, nor was the concentration of INPEA at which it was achieved. We interpret these observations to indicate that both sotalol and INPEA exert positive inotropic effects through a mechanism that does not involve adrenoceptors. The effects are considerably less prominent in atrial than in ventricular muscle (see Figs. 1B and 5). However, there is a clear "hump" in the dose-response curve (Fig. 1B) for the effect of sotalol on atrial contractility in the same range of concen- trations that stimulated the papillary muscle. Sotalot also produced a substantial increase in the force of contraction of guinea-pig atria in this same range of concentrations - an effect that was not associated with a positive chronotropic effect. Because of the dose relationships it seems likely that the inotropic effect of sotalol on atrial muscle is also not mediated by adrenoceptors. However, we have not tested this ex- plicitly with studies of the influence of propranotol and phenoxybenzamine. High concentrations (> 6 x 10 -5 M) of sotalol, INPEA, and pindolol consis- tently produced contractions with a late tonic com- ponent in the kitten papillary muscle. None of the other
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1035-7
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`212 Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 311 (1980) LU F- C3 LU CL <3 ..J bj bj C3 160 120 80 40 0 I I I I I0 6 5 4 3 -LOG MOLAR (-+) SOTALOL (cid:12)9 Control (6) X Propronolol (4) 0 Phenoxybenzomine (4) I E I 9 8 7 j 9 8 7 6 5 4 5 2 CONCEN TRA TION Fig. 7. Non-sympathomimetic stimuiant effects of sotalol and INPEA on kitten papillary muscles. Cumulative concentration effect curves for racemic mixtures determined in absence (I) and presence (x) of 10-6M ((cid:127) and after incubation with 5x10-6M phenoxybenzamine ((cid:14)9 Propranolol was added 45 - 60 min before the first concentration of sotalol or INPEA; and remained in the bath during the determination of the dose-response curve. The muscles exposed to phenoxybenzamine were taken from reserpine-pretreated kittens and were incubated with 5 x 10- 6 M phen oxybenzamine for 2 h before the start of the dose response curve for sotalol; phenoxybenzamine was not present in the bath during the determination of the dose-response curve. Only one curve was determined on a given preparation. Symbols indicate mean (cid:127) SEM; numbers of experiments indicated by figures in parentheses /3-blockers studied was ever observed to produce such an effect, and none was ever observed in the prepara- tions of atrial muscle. The late tonic component consisted in a prolonged interruption of the process of relaxation (Figs. 8 and 9). The muscle was inexcitable during the late tonic component, but regained its excitability immediately after the abrupt relaxation (Fig. 8). The concentrations of sotalol, INPEA, and pin- dolol required to produce contractions with a late tonic component were all about the same. The late tonic component was usually first detectable at 6 x 10-s M, and was almost always present at 2 x 10 .4 M. In the case of sotalol, these concentrations were those at which the greatest positive inotropic effects were ob- served (Fig. 7). However, in the cases of INPEA and pindolol these concentrations fell partly (INPEA) or wholly (pindolol) in

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket