throbber
Journal of Chromatography, 3 14 (1984) 462-466 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam - Printed in The Netherlands CHROM. 17,138 Note Optical resolution of /l-blocking agents by thin-layer chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography as diastereomeric R- (-)-1 -(l -naphthyl)ethylureas G. GOBITZ* and S. MIHELLYES Institut fir Pharmazeutische Chemie der Karl-Franzens-Universitiit, A-8010 Graz (Austria) (Received August 11 th, 1984) The pharmacological effects of adrenergic P-blocking drugs are mainly due to the S-forms’. S-( -)-Propanolol, for example, is 100 times more active than the
`(+)-enantiomer. With the exception of stereoselective syntheses, racemates are ob- tained in drug synthesis. To avoid unnecessary stress on the organism caused by inactive, or in some cases toxic, forms, the resolution of racemates and the admin- istration of pure enantiomers is an interesting approach. Chromatographic methods have been used for analytical purposes to a great extent in recent yearszM4. The few methods published for the HPLC resolution of racemic /?-blocking agents are based on direct separation or the use of chiral deri- vatization reagents. A direct separation of some B-blocking agents by ion-pairing chromatography using D-camphor sulphonic acid as chiral additive to the mobile phase was described by Pettersson and Schill’. Hermansson and Von Bahr6s7 used N-trifluoroacetyl-S-propyl chloride, tert.-butoxycarbonyl+alanine anhydride and tert.-butoxycarbonyl-L-leucine anhydride as chiral derivatization reagents for the HPLC resolution of R,S-propranolol and some other j%blockers. More recent work describes the use of
`
`R-(
`
`R-
`
`+)-1-phenylethyl isocyanates and 2,3,4,6-tetra-0-acetyl-B- D-glucopyranosyl isothiocyanateg as chiral reagents for the HPLC resolution of some /?-blocking agents. We have investigated the applicability of
`-)-1-(1-naphthyl)ethyl isocya- natelo for the resolution of P-blocking agents l l. This reagent shows some advantages over
`1-phenylethyl isocyanate with the respect to resolution and sensitivity of detection. The NEIC derivatives show a high UV absorption and a strong fluores- cence. EXPERIMENTAL
`
`R-( + )-
`
`R-(
`
`Chemicals and reagents
`
`R-(
`[R-(
`All solvents used were of analytical grade and obtained from Merck (Darm- stadt, F.R.G.).
`
`-)-NEIC] was purchased from Ega Chemie (Steinheim, F.R.G.). R,S-Propranolol and R,S-alprenolol were purchased from Sigma (Munchen, F.R.G.). R,S-Pindolol was obtained from Sandoz (Basel, Switzerland). R,S-Oxprenolol, R,S-bunitrolol and R,S-metroprolol were ob- tained from Hassle (Molndal, Sweden). 0021-9673/84/$03.00 0 1984 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1017-1
`IPR2016-00379
`
`-)-I-(1-Naphthyl)ethyl isocyanate
`

`
`NOTES 463
`
`HPLC
`
`instrumentation and conditions
`
`The HPLC system consisted of a Perkin-Elmer Series 2 liquid chromatograph equipped with a Rheodyne 7105 injector and a Perkin-Elmer LC-55 UV detector. UV detection was carried out at 290 nm. For fluorescence detection, a Parkin-Elmer spectrofluorometer MPF 44 equipped with a 20-~1 Hellma flow-through cell was used. The excitation monochromator was set at 285 nm and the emission mono- chromator at 335 nm. The separations were carried out on a Knauer RP-18 column (20 x 0.4 cm I.D.) with methanol-water (70:30 or 60:40) as mobile phase.
`
`TLC conditions
`
`The solutions were applied to HPTLC silica gel plates (Merck, Darmstadt, F.R.G.) with a 200-~1 Pt-Ir capillary (Antech, Bad Diirkheim, F.R.G.). Development was performed in benzene-ether-acetone (S&10:5) over a distance of 5 cm.
`
`Derivatization procedure
`
`To l-50 pmol of the free bases or their salts (Fig. 1) dissolved in a mixture of dry chloroform and dimethylformamide (8:2), an equimolar amount of triethylamine and a
`
`ca.
`
`two-fold molar excess of R-( -)-NEIC were added. After a reaction time of 20 min the excess reagent was destroyed by the addition of diethylamine. After a further 15 min an aliquot of the reaction mixture was transferred to a TLC plate or to the liquid chromatograph. q- CH,- YH - CH, NH - TH CH3 Alprenolol ,CH,-CH-CH, TH, -O-CH,$H-CH;NH-TH OH CH, Metoproloi CH;O-CH,CH, / \ -O-CH;CH-CH;NH-:: 0 -
`
`6H dH, Bunitrolol Oxprenolol 1 \ -O-CH,CH=CH, 0
`74 /-0-CH,CH-CH,-NH-CH &H kH, Pindolol ?-CH,- $H -CH,-NH-CH(CH,)~ Fig. 1. Structures of the drugs investigated.
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1017-2
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`464 NOTES RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Isocyanates form ureas with amines and carbamates with alcohols. This re- action principle has already been used for UV** and fluorescence13*14 derivatization in HPLC and TLC. The reaction of R-( -)-NEIC with the investigated l-aryloxy- 3-isopropylamino-2-propanol derivatives leads uniformly to diastereomeric ureas, which can be separated by TLC or HPLC. Reaction takes place only with the amino group. The hydroxy group does not react under the conditions applied. No racemi- zation is observed during the reaction. The addition of triethylamine allows for the direct reaction of the salts without the preliminary liberation of the free bases. To destroy the excess isocyanate, diethylamine is added after the reaction. The reaction scheme is shown in Fig. 2. As can be seen from Fig. 3, all the derivatives investigated are well resolved on HPTLC silica gel plates. The R-( + ) forms always have higher RF values than the S-( -) isomers (Table I). HPLC separations were carried out on RP-18 columns using methanol-water as mobile phase. R-0-CH,-OH-CH;NH(CH,), + CH, 6H H&NC0 + I CH3 0 WCH,), H~-NH-~-~-CH,CH-~H_O_R &i Fig. 2. Scheme of the reaction of I-aryloxy-3-isopropylamino-2-propanols with R-( -)-l-(l-naphthyl)ethyl isocyanate. 0000~00
`
`0
`
`0 0 0 0 8 0 8
`
`0
`
`1
`
`2 3 4 5 6 7 Fig. 3. TLC of the
`-)-1-(1-naphthyl)ethyhueas of some p-blocking agents on silica gel HPTLC plates. Solvents, benzene-ether-acetone (88:10:5). Spots: 1, blank; 2, bunitrolol; 3, metoprolol; 4, alprenolol; 5, propranolol; 6, oxprenolol; 7, pindololol.
`
`R-(
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1017-3
`IPR2016-00379
`
`. .
`

`
`465
`
`TABLE I RF VALUES OF THE ENANTIOMERS OF SOME B-BLOCKING AGENTS AS THEIR NEIC DE, RIVATIVES Plates, silica gel HPTLC; solvent, benzene-ether-acetone (80:10:5).
`
`Compound
`
`RF
`
`R
`
`S
`
`Bunitrolol Metoprolol Alprenolol Propranolol Oxprenolol Pindolol Blank
`
`0.42 0.37 0.32 0.27 0.41 0.33 0.51 0.42 0.37 0.32 0.38 0.33 0.56 - Fig. 4 shows the resolution of R,S-propranolol. For the determination of the elution order the pure enantiomers, resolved in a preparative scale with (+)-tolyl- tartaric acid, were injected after derivatization with the isocyanate. In addition to propranolol, a series of other racemic /&blocking agents can be resolved by HPLC. The k’ and M values of some derivatives are given in Table II. Fig. 5 shows the resolution of R,S-bunitrolol, R,S-metropolol and R,S-alprenolol. Owing to the high molar absorptivity of the naphthylethylureas, UV absor- bance is a satisfactory method of detection. Enhanced sensitivity can be obtained by 2 + ’ 6
`30 mm - I , , , , , I ’ 6 18 30 min Fig. 4. Resolution of the enantiomers of propranolol as their NEIC derivatives. Column, RP-18, 25 x 0.46 cm I.D.; mobile phase, methanol-water (70:30); flow-rate, 2 ml/min; detection, UV 290 nm. Fig. 5. Resolution of the enantiomers of bunitrolol, metoprolol and alprenolol. For conditions, see Fig. 4.
`
`18
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1017-4
`IPR2016-00379
`
`NOTES
`

`
`466 NOTES TABLE II k’ AND u VALUES OF THE ENANTIOMERS OF SOME B-BLOCKING AGENTS AS THEIR NEIC DERIVATIVES Mobile phase, methanol-water (70:30, except for pindolol, 60:40). k’ (N k’ (S) a Bunitrolol 1.5 2.0 1.33 Metoprolol 2.5 3.2 1.3 Alprenolol 6.9 10.4 1.5 Propranolol 6.8 10.3 1.5 Oxprenolol 2.2 3.0 1.33 Pindolol 8.0 11.2 1.4 fluorescence detection, Nanogram amounts of one enantiomer derivatized with NEIC are detectable in the presence odf a loo-fold excess of the other stereoisomer. Quan- titative determination of the enantiomers is also possible by this method. As preliminary experiments have shown, the method is also applicable to sym- pathicomimethic drugs; e.g., R,S-ephedrine can be resolved. Research to extend this procedure to drugs with alcoholic hydroxy groups to form the diastereomeric car- bamates is also in progress. REFERENCES 1 L. T. Potter, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 155 (1967) 91. 2 V. A. Davankov, Advan. Chromatogr., 18 (1980) 139. 3 W. Lindner, Chimia, 35 (1981) 35. 4 V. A. Davankov, Advan. Chromatogr., 22 (1983) 71. 5 C. Pettersson and G. S&ill, J. Chromatogr., 204 (1981) 179. 6 J. Hermansson and C. von Bahr, J. Chromatogr., 221 (1980) 109. 7 J. Hermansson and C. von Bahr, J. Chromatogr., 227 (1982) 113. 8 J. A. Thompson, J. L. Holtzman, M. Tsuru, C. L. Lerman and J. L. Holtzman, J. Chromatogr., 238 (1982) 470. 9 A. J. Sedman and J. Gal, J. Chromatogr., 278 (1983) 199. 10 W. H. Pirkle and M. S. Hoekstra, J. Org. Chem., 39 (1974) 3904. 11 G. Giibitz, 1. ht. Symposium der Gesamtdeutschen Pharmazeutischen Gesellschaft, Miinchen. April 17-20, 1983. 12 B. Bjiirkqvist and H. Toivonen, J. Chromatogr., 153 (1978) 265. 13 R. Wintersteiger and G. Wenniger-Weinzierl, Z. Anal. Chem., 309 (1981) 201. 14 R. Wintersteiger, G. Wenninger-Weinzierl and W. Pacha, J. Chromatogr., 237 (1982) 399.
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1017-5
`IPR2016-00379

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket