throbber
LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-1
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-2
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`First published in 1988 by
`ELLIS HORWOOD LIMITED
`Market Cross House , Cooper Street,
`Chichester, West Sussex, P019 lEB, England
`The publisher's colophon is reproduced from James Gillison's drawing of the ancient Market Cross,
`Chichester.
`
`Distributors:
`Australia and New Zealand:
`JACARANDA WILEY LIMITED
`GPO Box 859, Brisbane , Queensland 4001, Australia
`Canada:
`JOHN WILEY & SONS CANADA LIMITED
`22 Worcester Road, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada
`Europe and Africa:
`JOHN WILEY & SONS LIMITED
`Baffins Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, England
`North and South America and the rest of the world:
`Halsted Press: a division of
`JOHN WILEY & SONS
`605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158, USA
`South-East Asia
`JOHN WILEY & SONS (SEA) PTE LIMITED
`37 Jalan Pemimpin # 05-04
`Block B , Union Industrial Building, Singapore 2057
`Indian Subcontinent
`WILEY EASTERN LIMITED
`4835/24 Ansari Road
`Daryaganj, New Delhi 110002, India
`© 1988 S. G. Allenmark/Ellis Horwood Limited
`
`British Library Cataloguing In Publication Data
`Allenmark, S. G . (Stig G.) , 1936-
`Chromatographic enamtioseparation.
`l . Chromatography
`I. Title
`543'.089
`Library of Congress Card No. 88-1092
`ISBN 0-84312-988-6 (Ellis Horwood Limited)
`ISBN 0-470-21080-X (Halsted Press)
`Typeset in Times by Ellis Horwood Limited
`Printed in Great Britain by Hartnolls, Bodmin
`
`COPYRIGHT NOTICE
`All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced , stored in a retrieval system, or
`transmitted , in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
`without the permission of Elhs Horwood Limited, Market Cross House, Cooper Street, Chichester, West
`Sussex, England.
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-3
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`Table of contents
`
`Preface . ... . .......... . ........ . ............... . ....... 9
`
`List of Symbols and Abbreviations ................ . ... . ......... 11
`
`1 Introduction ..... .. .... .. .. .. . ....................... 13
`Bibliography .................... . ............. . ..... . 18
`References ..... . ....................... ... .... . . .. .. 18
`
`2 The development of modern stereochemical concepts
`2.1 Chirality and molecular structure ......................... 19
`2.1.1 Molecules with asymmetric atoms ...................... 19
`2.1.2 Other types of chiral molecular structures ..... . ........... 20
`2.2 Definitions and nomenclature .......... . ................ 23
`Bibliography ........................... . ...... . .. . . .. 26
`References . ....... . ................ .... .......... .. . 26
`
`3 Techniques used for studies of optically active compounds
`3.1 Determination of optical or enantiomeric purity ............... 27
`3.1. l Methods not involving separation ... .. ................. 27
`3.1. l.1 Polarimetry ................................. 27
`3.1.1.2 Nuclear magnetic resonance .. .. . .. .. . ...... . ..... . 29
`3.1.l.3 Isotope dilutio n .................. . ..... .. ..... 31
`3.1.l.4 Calorimetry .... . ... .. . .. ... . ................ 33
`3.1.1.5 Enzyme techniques ................... . ......... 33
`3.1. 2 Methods based on separation ......................... 34
`3.2 Determination of absolute configuration .................... 35
`3.2.l X-Ray crystallography with anomalous scattering ...... . .. ... 36
`3.2.2 Spectroscopic (ORD , CD) and chromatographic methods
`based on comparison ......... .. ..... .. ............ 37
`Bibliography ................... .. .. ...... .... ...... . .40
`References .. . . ... ............... . ................... 40
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-4
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-5
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-6
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`8
`
`Table of contents
`
`Bibliography .................. . • ........ .. ..... . .. . .. 188
`References .. .... ... .. . .. .... . . ... ... .. .. .. . . .. .. .. . 188
`
`9 Preparative scale enantioseparations- need, progress and problems . . .. 192
`Bibliography . . .... . ..... . ............ . ... .. . .... .... 199
`References ... .. . . . . ... .. . ... . .... .. .... . .. . . .. ..... 199
`
`10 Future trends
`10.l New detector systems . .. .. .. .... . .. .. .... . .... . ... . .. 200
`10.2 Column improvements . . . . ... . .... . ... .. .... . ... . .... 203
`10.3 Supercritical fluid chromatography . . . . .... . . .. .. . ........ 206
`Bibliography .. . .... ... . .. .. ... ... .. ....... .. . . . ..... 206
`References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
`
`11 ~xperimental procedures for the synthesis of chiral sorbents
`11.1 Techniques for the preparation of chiral sorbents by
`derivatization of polysaccharides . .. .... ... .. .. . .. .. . . .. . 208
`11.1.1 Preparation of microcrystalline cellulose triacetate (MCTA) .... 208
`11.1 .2 Preparation of silica coated with cellulose triacetate .. .. . . .. . 209
`11.1.3 Preparation of silica coated with cellulose triphenylcarbamate ... 209
`11.2 Polymerization procedures used to obtain chiral synthetic
`polymer materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
`11.2.1 Preparation of poly[(S)-N-acryloylphenylalanineethyl ester] ... . 209
`11.2.2 Preparation of polycellulose(triphenylmethyl methacrylate) ... . 211
`11.3 Techniques used for the binding of chiral selectors to silica .. .. . ... 211
`11 .3.1 Preparation of 3-glycidoxypropyl-silica ... . ... ........ . . . 212
`11 .3.2 Large-scale preparation of (R)-N-(3,5-dinitrobenzoyl)-
`phenylglycine covalently silica-bound sorbent . .. .. .. . .. . .. 212
`11 .3.3 Preparation of (S)-(- )-~-N-(2-naphthyl)leucine .. .. .. ...... 213
`11 .3.4 Hydrosilylation of (R)-N-(10-undecenoyl)-~-(6,7-dimethyl-
`1-naphthyl) isobutylamine . ... ... . .. . . . . . . .. ... ... . . 213
`11.3.5 Preparation of silica-bonded (S) -1-(~-napththyl)ethylamine .... 213
`11.3.6 Preparation of silica-bound polyacrylamide and
`polymethacrylamide . . . .. . .... . ...... . ......... . . . 214
`Bibliography .... .. . ... ... .. .. . .. . . .. .. .. . .. .. . ... .. . 214
`References .... . ... . ... . ... ... ... . .. . ... . . .. ... . . ... 214
`
`Appendix: Commercial suppliers of chiral columns for GC and LC . . ....... 216
`
`Index . .. .. ....... .. .... . .... .. ...... .. . . ...... .. .. . . . 218
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-7
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`5
`Theory of chiral chromatography for direct
`optical resolution
`
`In the previous chapter it was noted that separation of enantiomers, by the formation
`of diastereomeric derivatives, is associated with a number of disadvantages which
`make its use relatively unattractive. Therefore , direct separations, i.e. by the use of a
`chiral stationary phase, are far more interesting from an analytical , as well as a
`preparative point of view. Particularly in LC, a technique that is very suitable for
`separation without prior derivatization, development of new chiral stationary phases
`has been a rapidly expanding field during the last few years. It is the purpose of this
`chapter to give a general treatment of the theories underlying the various efforts and
`achievements made in this area.
`
`5.1 THE PREREQUISITE FOR ENANTIOSELECTIVE INTERACTION WITH
`THE CHIRAL STATIONARY PHASE
`In all forms of chromatography, separation is based on differences in retention of
`some kind by the stationary phase. We have already seen how the chromatographic
`process can be regarded as a series of equilibria and how the equilibrium constant
`describing the distribution of a compound between the stationary and mobile phases
`is related to the chromatographic capacity ratio . It has been customary to distinguish
`between partition and adsorption chromatography, depending upon whether the
`stationary phase is a liquid or a solid. With the introduction of bonded organic phases
`in LC and immobilized coatings in fused silica capillary GC, this distinction is no
`longer obvious. Nevertheless the consideration of primary importance should be the
`types of molecular interactions with the stationary phase that cause retention.
`It should be helpful for later discussions , however, to consider the fact that there
`are cases in which retention is not due to bonding interactions with a stationary phase
`but rather to differences in the distance the components under separation have to
`travel through the column. In principle, molecular sieve chromatography, of
`particular importance for protein separation, operates essentially by means of steric
`exclusion, i.e. the larger molecules travel a shorter distance because they are unable
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-8
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`Sec. 5.1)
`
`The prerequisite for enantioselective interaction
`
`65
`
`to diffuse into the finer pores of the matrix and are therefore eluted faster than the
`smaller molecules.
`The theory of chiral chromatography (i.e. separation in which a chiral stationary
`phase selectively retains more of one enantiomer than the other) is still rather
`rudimentary. A number of chiral recognition models have been proposed to account
`for optical resolutions by GC and LC, which are often based on the 'three-point
`interaction' theory advanced by Dalgliesh [1] in 1952. According to this postulate,
`three simultaneously operating interactions between an enantiomer and the station(cid:173)
`ary phase are needed for chiral discrimination. The enantioselective situation is
`visualized in Fig. 5.1. It is obvious that this is a sufficient condition for enantioselec-
`
`chiral
`selector
`
`solute
`enantiomers
`
`Fig. 5.1-The three-point interaction model advanced by Dalgliesh.
`
`tion to occur. Now it may be asked whether it is always necessary. As we shall see
`later, there are many instances where this is probably not the case.
`Dalgliesh arrived at his conclusions from studies of certain aromatic amino-acids
`by paper chromatography. He assumed that the hydroxyl groups of the cellulose
`were hydrogen-bonded to the amino and carboxyl groups of the amino-acid. A third
`interaction was caused, according to these views, by the aromatic ring substituents.
`The 'three-points rule' has often been used in a very uncritical way to rationalize
`experimental results. It is therefore important to try to analyse the situation in more
`detail. It is readily understood that in order to determine the configuration of a chiral
`object by matching with some probe , a minimum of three simultaneous, spatially
`significant contacts or interactions must be present. This minimum number of
`contact points, however, does not necessarily mean points of attachment when it
`comes to molecular interactions. In principle, a situation where only steric inter(cid:173)
`actions cause a molecular steric discrimination is quite possible. In adsorption
`chromatography, though , there must always exist some kind of bonding interaction
`with the sorbent. This may arise through any non-covalent attachment possible
`under the prevailing conditions. Thus , hydrogen bonding as well as ionic or dipole
`attraction is enhanced by non-polar solvents, whereas hydrophobic interactions may
`be important in aqueous media, etc.
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-9
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`66
`
`Theory of chiral chromatography for direct optical resolution
`
`[Ch.5
`
`5.2 SOME GENERAL ASPECTS REGARDING CHIRAL RECOGNITION
`MODELS AND CHROMATOGRAPHIC ENANTIOSELECTIVITY
`Optical resolution by chromatography is possible through reversible diastereomeric
`association between a chiral environment, introduced into a column , and solute
`enantiomers. The multiplicity of experimental conditions under which direct chro(cid:173)
`matographic optical resolutions have been achieved also tells us that the difference in
`association which is necessary can be obtained by means of many types of molecular
`interactions. The association, which may be expressed quantitatively as an equili(cid:173)
`brium constant, will be a function of the magnitudes of the binding as well as of the
`repulsive interactions involved. The latter are usually steric, although dipole-dipole
`repulsions may also occur, whereas various kinds of binding interactions may
`operate. These include hydrogen bonding, electrostatic and dipole-dipole attrac(cid:173)
`tions, charge-transfer interaction and hydrophobic interaction (in aqueous systems).
`As we shall see in the following chapters, a single type of bonding interaction may be
`sufficient to promote enantiomer differentiation . For example , it appears to be quite
`evident that hydrogen bonding, as the sole source of attraction, is sufficient for
`optical resolution in some GC as well as LC modes of separation. The fact that
`enantiomeric solutes, bearing only one hydrogen bonding substituent, can be
`separated under such conditions, points to the conclusion that only one attractive
`force is necessary for chiral discrimination in this type of chromatography.
`Taking a one-point binding interaction as a model, we may envisage a difference
`in the equilibrium constant of the two enantiomers at the chiral binding site as due to
`effects from the site forcing one of the enantiomers to take an unfavourable
`conformation. This resembles a situation often assumed to be present in enzyme(cid:173)
`substrate interactions to account for substrate specificity.
`Let us follow the reasoning a bit further. Is it possible to base enantiomer
`differentiation entirely on steric fit? In other words , can chiral cavities be constructed
`for the preferential inclusion of only one enantiomer? Although no chiral stationary
`phase (CSP) has yet been prepared that is based entirely on steric exclusion from
`chiral cavities (cf. Section 7.1.3), some recent work with the use of 'molecular
`imprinting' techniques is very interesting in this respect [2). The idea is to create rigid
`chiral cavities in a polymer network is such a way that only one of two enantiomers
`will find the environment acceptable. Other types of CSPs, where steric fit is of
`primary importance, include those based on inclusion phenomena, such as cyclodex(cid:173)
`trin and crown-ether phases. These are described in Chapter 7.
`In the following sections some theoretical aspects of important binding types
`present in enantioselective sorption processes are given.
`
`5.2.1 Co-ordination to transition metals
`The transition metals are characterized by having unfilled inner-shell d-orbitals. A
`transition metal complex is formed by ligands which may donate electrons to these
`unfilled orbitals. Such co-ordination complexes possess a very well-defined geo(cid:173)
`metry, such that the ligands can only occupy certain given positions in space. The
`donor ligand atoms in the complex are thus held at strictly fixed distances from the
`metal atom and in defined orientations. This so-called co-ordination sphere is
`therefore densely packed with the ligands and with the solvent molecules. The latter
`also form a second (outer) highly organized sphere. This , in turn, means that the
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-10
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-11
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-12
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`Sec. 5.2)
`
`Some general aspects regarding chiral recognition models
`
`69
`
`Inclusion phenomena
`5.2.3
`The ability of certain compounds to use their particular structures to include suitable
`guest molecules has long been known. Classical examples are the host properties of
`urea and starch. Crystal analyses have shown that urea molecules form complexes
`with a channel-like interior into which unbranched alkanes fit nicely. Such n-alkane
`-urea complexes therefore form spontaneously. Branched alkanes do not fit into
`such interiors and consequently this phenomenon can be used to separate n-alkanes
`from mixtures of isomers. Starch is well known for its inclusion of iodine. The
`cyclodextrins (Schardinger's dextrins) are crystalline degradation products of starch,
`which are obtained through the action of micro-organisms (see Section 7.1.1.1.).
`Whereas the (¥-form , composed of a ring with six glucose units, is of the correct size to
`include iodine or benzene , it is too small to include bromobenzene. The P-form
`(composed of seven units) , on the other hand, is (contrary to the (¥-form) precipi(cid:173)
`tated by bromobenzene as a consequence of inclusion complex formation.
`The strict steric requirements for the formation of such 'host-guest' complexes
`imply that these phenomena should be highly stereoselective. Thus , by the use of a
`chiral host, enantiomeric guest molecules might be separated. These principles are
`utilized fully or partially in some of the liquid chromatographic techniques described
`in Chapter 7. A short general treatment of the inclusion phenomena present, or
`thought to be present , in these enantiomer-differentiating phases is given below.
`Let us consider two different types of host molecules, one with a hydrophilic
`interior and hydrophobic exterior and the other with the opposite polarity configu(cid:173)
`ration (Fig. 5.4).
`
`f:::,, hydrophilic groups
`
`0 hydrophobic groups
`
`includes hyd r op hilic
`guest
`
`(al
`
`includes hydrophobic
`guest
`
`(bl
`
`Fig. 5.4 - Simplified models to represent different types of host-guest inclusion complex
`formation.
`
`The hydrophilic interior in a means that the cavity contains hetero-atoms such as
`oxygen, where lone-pair electrons are able to participate in bonding to electron
`acceptors such as metal or organic cations. The hydrophobic exterior makes the
`host-guest complex as a whole soluble in organic media , a phenomenon which has
`been exploited in so-called phase-transfer catalysis (cf. Section 7 .2.1 ). One type of
`these host compounds is found in the naturally occurring macrocyclic polyethers,
`which are known to bind alkali-metal cations. Synthetic chiral analogues of these
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-13
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`70
`
`Theory of chiral chromatography for direct optical resolution
`
`(Ch.5
`
`compounds, chiral crown ethers, have been found to exert remarkable enantioselec(cid:173)
`tivity towards organic ammonium ions . In these cases the ammonium ion is held
`within the cavity by hydrogen bonds to the ether oxygen atoms. Thus, in this case, the
`structural and steric requirements of the guest are high.
`The hydrophobic interior of b, on the other hand, means that a cavity suitable for
`inclusion of hydrocarbon-rich parts of a molecule is present. No bonds are involved
`in the complex formation , as the inclusion is merely a result of the hydrophobic effect
`and the structural demands are not as pronounced as in the previous case. This type
`of host is found in the cyclodextrins, which will be treated in Sections 7 .1.1.1 and
`7.3.2. Under reversed-phase conditions (aqueous media) the combination of hydro(cid:173)
`phobic interaction, which generates inclusion , with steric effects from substituents
`present in a chiral structure on the cavity entrance, is assumed to be the cause of
`enantioselection.
`A rather special case of inclusion effects is found in chiral matrices composed of
`swollen, microcrystalline cellulose derivatives. The triacetate, prepared by hetero(cid:173)
`geneous acetylation in order to preserve microcrystallinity , has been shown to act
`partially by steric exclusion effects. Thus, of a series of aromatic hydrocarbons (with
`essentially no bonding properties) , benzene is highly retained, mesitylene (2,3,5-
`trimethylbenzene) is much less retained and 1,3 ,5-tri-tert-butylbenzene is totally
`excluded (no retention) . This phenomenon can be explained by considering the
`lamellar arrangement of the polysaccharide chains. These yield a kind of two(cid:173)
`dimensional molecular sieve, permitting inclusion of flat aromatic compounds in
`particular, but excluding sterically more demanding structures. The higher retention
`of benzene (compared to that of toluene) has further led to the suggestion of a
`secondary effect, viz. an action by pockets in the chain structure.
`
`5.3 SOME THERMODYNAMIC AND KINETIC CONSIDERATIONS
`5.3.1 Temperature effects on C¥
`Recalling our treatment in the previous chapter and the definition of C¥ , we may
`readily arrive at Eq. (5.1) by considering the equilibrium of each enantiomer
`between the mobile and the stationary phase. If the equilibrium constants are
`denoted by KR and Ks, respectively, the expression for the change in free energy,
`!lG0 = -RTinK, will give the free energy difference: llllG0 = !lG0 R- llG0 s, as
`- !l!lG0 = R11nKRIKs , where K = C/Cm and KR > Ks (arbitrary assumption). From
`our definition of k' we know that k' = KV5 /V m which then gives Eq. (5.1):
`
`-!l!lG0 = RTinkRlk$ = RTinC¥
`
`(5.1)
`
`Thus, the free energy difference associated with a given ex-value is easily
`computed from chromatographic data. The figures given in Table 5.1 are quite
`illustrative as they show the very small energy difference that is needed for complete
`optical resolution , provided a reasonable column efficiency is available.
`In the previous chapter, we have also seen that modern column technology can
`provide us with extremely efficient capillary columns, which in good analytical GC
`instruments give baseline resolution of peaks even at ex-values< 1.05. In columns of
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-14
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`Sec. 5.3)
`
`Some thermodynamic and kinetic considerations
`
`71
`
`Table 5.1 - Free energy differences necessary to produce separation factors > 1
`
`1.05
`1.10
`1.50
`2.00
`10.0
`
`D.D.G , cal/mole (J/mole)
`
`29 (121)
`56 (236)
`240 (1005)
`410 (1717)
`1364 (5705)
`
`effective plate numbers around 2x 105 an n:-value of 1.01 means only 2% peak
`overlap (Rs = 1.11), which, in turn , corresponds to an energy difference of only 5.9
`cal/mole (24. 7 J/mole). Such minute energy values are at least an order of magnitude
`lower than those normally associated with conformational changes in a molecule. It
`is obvious therefore, that binding of two enantiomers to a given chiral site may
`involve different amounts of energy simply because one of the enantiomers, for steric
`reasons , might be forced to adopt an energetically less favourable conformation.
`The much lower column efficiency in LC is often more than compensated for by
`the considerably larger n:-values that can be obtained. In certain cases n:-values of 30
`or more have been found, which then correspond to !l6.G0 values in the range of 2
`kcal/mole (8.4 kJ/mole) . Generally, such values are obtained owing to very low
`retention of the first enantiomer eluted. This means that a very enantioselective
`adsorption process is operating in the column, i.e. one of the enantiomers is virtually
`unbound by the CSP for steric reasons. Such phenomena are not easily explained by
`the three-point interaction model, but rather indicate the operation of a sort of
`'chiral steric exclusion' mechanism , more in line with a 'steric fit' concept involving
`only one binding interaction.
`An expansion of Eq. (5.1) to involve the enthalpy and entropy terms (by an
`application of the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation: G = H-TS) yields :
`
`Inn: = - 6.6.H° + 6.6.S°
`RT
`R
`
`(5.2)
`
`Thus, from a study of the dependence of n: on temperature, Inn: may be plotted as a
`function of 1/T. The slope of the line will then be proportional to the ehthalpy
`difference and Inn: = 0 will give the temperature at which the enthalpy and entropy
`contributions cancel each other. Such studies are easily performed by GC (5] . Figure
`5.5 shows the general appearance of such a plot.
`
`5.3.2 Peak coalescence due to enantiomerization phenomena
`There is always a possibility that the enantiomers of a compound may be intercon(cid:173)
`verted by some mechanism which generates an achiral intermediate. In solution suth
`processes are often acid- or base-catalysed and thus related to the stereochemkal
`fate of positively or negatively charged transient intermediates. Common examples
`are enantiomerization reactions through carbonium ion or carbanion formation
`(Scheme 5.1).
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-15
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`72
`
`Theory of chiral chromatography for direct optical resolution
`
`[Ch. 5
`
`020 I Ince
`
`.15
`
`.10
`
`.05
`
`0 -·
`.8
`
`20o•c
`
`100-C
`
`is·c
`
`OQ..NHPFP
`OONH PFP
`
`{}CH<H3
`NHPFP
`
`O<;H-tH2>iHPrP
`OPFP
`o~H~H-0
`OAcOA<
`A o~ HCHiOPFP
`OPFP
`
`, __
`
`I ! l!r-103 K-1
`
`1.5
`
`2.0
`
`2.5
`
`3.0
`
`Illustration of the decrease in the enantiomeric separation factor with increasing
`Fig. 5.5 -
`temperature for chiral GC separations. The plots permit evaluation of the enthalpy and entropy
`contributions, respectively, to the separation. Different compounds were studied, with the
`same column. (Reprinted, with permission, from B. KoppenhOfer and E. Bayer, Chromato·
`graphia , 1984, 19, 123. Copyright 1984, Fr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH).
`
`In these and similar cases, the free energy barrier to enantiomer interconversion
`will be dependent on substituent effects in the transition state leading to formation of
`the achiral intermediate.
`Even simpler mechanisms of enantiomerization are found in those cases where
`chirality is caused predominantly by steric hindrance, as in compounds with axial or
`planar chirality. Thus , if an atropisomeric compound is taken as an example (Scheme
`5.2), the free energy barrier to internal rotation around the central bond may be high
`enough to prevent any significant racemization of an optically active form, in solution
`at room temperature, and thereby permit its isolation. In many cases, however, the
`temperature has to be lowered considerably in order to decrease the rate of internal
`rotation leading to enantiomer interconversion.
`Taking such enantiomerization reactions into consideration in relation to chro(cid:173)
`matographic methods for direct optical resolution, it is obvious that there are many
`cases where the chromatographic conditions used play an important role. In general
`terms , if the chromatographic conditions are such that the rate of enantiomerization
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-16
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`Sec. 5.3)
`
`Some thermodynamic and kinetic considerations
`
`73
`
`A,,, ©
`C- H + HX
`Ar~
`
`H
`R,,, I
`~c\
`Ar
`X
`
`Scheme 5.1 - Examples of (a) an acid-catalysed and (b) a base-catalysed reaction yielding
`enantiomerization due to formation of achiral charged intermediates.
`
`:.>A____,-< I!__
`
`..____/
`
`,
`A'
`'\.,__;D
`,---\
`A
`
`D I
`
`Scheme 5.2-Thermal enantiomerization reactions by changes in molecular conformation by
`internal rotation, (a) in a biaryl system, and (b) in a polarized alkene system.
`
`is significant on the chromatographic time-scale , the elution pattern will deviate from
`the normal one. During passage of the first-eluted enantiomer through the column, it
`will be partially transformed into the last-eluted enantiomer. This process will result
`in tailing of the leading peak. Conversely, the enantiomer eluted last will also be
`transformed into the first-eluted enantiomer at the same rate. This will give rise to a
`'fronting' of the second peak. The net result will be an extended peak overlap , such
`that the baseline will not be reached between the two peaks. If the enantiomerization
`reaction is fast enough in comparison with the chromatographic process , complete
`coalescence of the peaks will take place. The situation is visualized in Fig. 5.6.
`Consequently, enantiomerization phenomena are readily detected by chromatogra(cid:173)
`enantiomerization
`rates may be
`phy on chiral phases. Conversely ,
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-17
`IPR2016-00379
`
`

`
`74
`
`Theory of chiral chromatography for direct optical resolution
`
`[Ch. 5
`
`CH~
`
`D<
`
`N
`I
`Cl
`
`tm
`I
`
`I
`
`.
`.-
`/ - ' ..
`
`0
`
`20
`
`40
`
`60
`
`0
`
`20
`
`min
`
`40 -mtn
`
`60
`
`Fig. 5.6 - C hromatographic patte rn a rising fro m on-wlumn enantiomerization . (Reprinted ,
`with pe rmission, from W. Biirkle , H . Ka rfunkel and V . Schurig, J . Chroma1og., 1984, 288, I.
`Copyright 1984, Elsevier Scie nce Publishers, V.V.).
`
`calculated from chromatographic peak coalescence data by use of suitable computer
`programs. However, very little work has yet been done in this field. It should also be
`kept in mind that the rate observed may not always be representative of that in bulk
`solution , because the reaction process may be catalysed by the surfaces with which
`the solute comes into contact during passage through the column [6].
`We will return to the chiral chromatography of enantiomerization-labile com(cid:173)
`pounds in Section 8.5.
`
`BIBLIOGRAPHY
`J. Porath , Explo rations into the Field of Cha rge-Transfer Adsorption, J. Chroma1og., 1978, 159, 13
`(Chromalog. Rev., 1978, 22, 13).
`V . A . Davankov, Resolution of Racemates by Ligand-Exchange Chromatography, Adv. Chromalog.,
`1980, 18, 139.
`J. L. Atwood , J. E . D . Davies and D. D . McNicol (eds.) , Inclusion Compounds, Acade mic Press,
`London , 1984.
`D . Wo rsch a nd F. Vogt le , Sepa ration o f Enantiomers by Clath rate Fo rmation, Top. Curr. Chem., 1987,
`140, 21.
`
`REFERENCES
`[ I) C . Dalgliesh, J . Chem . Soc., 1952, 137.
`(2] G . Wulff, in Polymeric Reagents and Catalysts, W . T . Ford (ed.) , ACS, Washington DC, 1986, p .
`186.
`(3] W . H . Pirkle and T . C. Pochapsky, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 5627.
`(4] K. B. L ipkowitz, D . A . Demete r, C. A . Parish and T . Darden, Anal. Chem. , 1987, 59, 1731.
`[5] B . Ko ppenhofer and E . Bayer, Chromatographia , 1984, 19, 123.
`[6] G . Blaschke , A ngew. Chem., 1980, 92, 14.
`
`LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR CONSUMERS, LLC
`Exhibit 1013-18
`IPR2016-00379

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket