throbber
An Anti-a-Fetoprotein Antibody-Daunorubicin Conjugate
`With a Novel Poly-L-glutamic Acid Derivative as
`Intermediate Drug Carrier 1
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at University of Chicago on September 10, 2015
`
`Yutaka Tsukada,2 Yoshinori Kato,3 Naoji Umemoto,3 Yumiko Takeda,3 Takeshi Hara,3 and Hidematsu Hirai2
`
`ABSTRACT-In studies on antitumor antibody-cytotoxic drug
`conjugates as potential antitumor agents with improved tumor
`specificity, daunorubicin [(OM) daunomycin] was conjugated with
`an affinity-purified horse antibody to rat O'-fetoprotein (AFP) with
`a novel derivative of poIY-L-glutamic acid (PLGA) as the inter(cid:173)
`mediate drug carrier. A single masked thiol group first was
`introduced by PLGA, and the thiol group was generated from it
`after the linking of DM to PLGA at the carboxyl groups of PLGA.
`The thiol group was used selectively for binding PLGA-OM to
`antibody that had been modified so as to have the maleimide
`groups. The conjugates (OM:PLGA:immunoglobulin molar ratio,
`19.6:2.8:1 or 11.8:1.1:1) were more potent than OM in in vitro
`cytotoxicity against the AFP-producing rat ascites hepatoma cell
`line AH66. In therapeutic experiments, the conjugates were more
`efficacious in prolonging the lives of AH66 hepatoma-bearing
`OONRYU rats than OM, antibody, a mixture of OM and antibody,
`or a conjugate similarly prepared with normal horse immuno(cid:173)
`globulin.-JNCI 1984; 73:721-729.
`
`In recent years, there has been an increasing amount
`of research on the preJ1aration of antitumor agents with
`improved tumor specificity by covalent linking of
`antitumor drugs to antibodies against tumor-associated
`antigens (1-6). For realization of the potent antibody(cid:173)
`antitumor drug conjugates, conjugation methods must
`be developed by which a considerably large number of
`drug molecules can be linked to one molecule of
`antibody with minimal detrimental effect to the anti(cid:173)
`gen-binding activity of the antibody. Thus methods
`using an intermediate drug carrier (intermediary) were
`investigated. With these methods drugs first are con(cid:173)
`jugated with a macromolecular intermediary, which is
`linked in turn to antibody.
`We have developed a new conjugation method using
`as the intermediary a PLGA derivative that has a single
`active center for linking to antibody. Prior to its
`contact with drug-linked PLGA, the antibody was
`modified to contain functional groups that were reactive
`specifically with the active center of the PLGA deriva(cid:173)
`tive. This method is advantageous over the previous
`methods with the use of a similar intermediate drug
`carrier (7, 8) in that the present method affords con(cid:173)
`jugates that have a well-defined chemical structure and
`that are stable in solutions (being free from high(cid:173)
`molecular-weight conjugates and aggregates resulting
`from
`the binding of more than one molecule of
`antibody to the intermediary and the homo-coupling of
`the antibody). We prepared a DM conjugate by this
`method using aAFP, and the conjugate showed a
`carrier effect of antibody both in in vitro and in vivo
`
`antitumor activIties against the AFP-producing rat
`ascites hepatoma cell line AH66.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`aAFP.-Specific antiserum to rat AFP was produced
`in a horse by weekly sc injections of 1 mg purified AFP
`(9) emulsified in Freund's complete adjuvant. The
`aAFP (10) was purified by affinity chromatography of
`the antiserum on Sepharose 4B coupled to rat AFP
`(11).
`Tumor cells and rats.-The rat ascites hepatoma
`cell line AH66 used in this study was maintained by
`intraperitoneal passage in syngeneic male DONR YU
`rats (12). DONRYU rats were purchased from Nihon
`Rat Co., Saitama, Japan, and were 10-12 weeks old
`(190-210 g) at the beginning of the in vivo experiments.
`Preparation of Ig-PLGA-DM conjugates (text-figs. 1,
`2).-Anti-AFP and control normal conjugates subjected
`to biological studies were prepared twice in different
`batches from PLGA (table I); details are given for the
`first preparation (preparation 1) in table 1.
`Introduction of the 3-(2-pyridyldithio )propionyl group
`to PLGA.-To a stirred solution of Na salt of PLGA
`(average mol wt, 21,000; Sigma Chemical Co., St.
`Louis, Mo.) (PLGA, I; 1.0 g, 47.6 Jlmol) in 0.1 M Na
`phosphate buffer, pH 7.5 (70 ml), was added at room
`temperature a solution of SPDP (Pharmacia Chemicals
`AB, Uppsala, Sweden; 0.3 g, 0.96 mmol) (13) in DMF
`(6 ml) in three portions at 1.5-hour intervals, and the
`mixture was stirred for an additional 1.5 hours. Then
`
`ABBREVIATIONS USED: AFP=O'-fetoprotein; aAFP=affinity-purified
`horse anti-rat a-fetoprotein antibody; CMF-PBS=Ca2+ _Mg2+ -free
`phosphate-buffered saline; DM=daunorubicin (daunomycin); DMF=
`N,N-dimethylformamide; DNP-Cys=dinitrophenylcysteine; DTT=l,4-
`dithiothreitol; EDCI = l-ethy 1-3-( 3-dimethylaminopropy I )carbodiimide
`hydrochloride; Ig=immunoglobulin; 2-ME==2-mercaptoethanol; MST==
`mean survival time(s); nIg==normal horse immunoglobulin; PAGE==
`polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PBS==phosphate-buffered saline;
`PLGA==polY-L-glutamic acid; 5MBE==N-succinimidyl m-(N-maleimido)(cid:173)
`benzoate; 5MBU==N-succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimido)butyrate; SPDP==
`N-succinimidyI3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionate.
`
`I Received january 3, 1984; accepted May 18, 1984.
`2 Department of Biochemistry, Hokkaido University School of
`Medicine, Sapporo 060, japan.
`3 Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Biochemistry, Teijin
`Institute for Biomedical Research, Hino, Tokyo 191, japan.
`
`721
`
`JNC), VOL. 73, NO.3, SEPTEMBER 1984
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS Exhibit 1041 - Page 721
`
`IPR for Patent No. 8,951,962
`
`

`
`
`
`722 Tsukada, Kato, Umemoto, et al. 722 Tsukada, Kato, Umemoto, et al.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at University of Chicago on September 10, 2015
`
`phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 0.5 M NaCI (1.0
`phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 0.5 M NaCI (1.0
`ml), and the mixture was heated at 40°C for 30 minutes
`ml), and the mixture was heated at 40°C for 30 minutes
`
`and dialyzed against 5 mM Na acetate buffer (pH 5.5) and dialyzed against 5 mM Na acetate buffer (pH 5.5)
`
`containing 0.14 M NaCI and I mM EDT A to give the containing 0.14 M NaCI and I mM EDT A to give the
`
`PLGA-DM conjugate having the free PLGA-DM conjugate having the free
`
`thiol group thiol group
`
`HS-PLGA-DM (V). HS-PLGA-DM (V).
`
`Binding of HS-PLGA-DM to 19.-To a solution of Binding of HS-PLGA-DM to 19.-To a solution of
`
`aAFP in 0.1 M Na phosphate buffer, pH 6.5 (23.4 aAFP in 0.1 M Na phosphate buffer, pH 6.5 (23.4
`
`mg/ml, 1.6 ml), was added 50 mM 5MBE (0.1 mI, 5 mg/ml, 1.6 ml), was added 50 mM 5MBE (0.1 mI, 5
`
`JLmol) (14) in DMF, and the mixture was allowed to JLmol) (14) in DMF, and the mixture was allowed to
`
`stand at 25°C for 30 minutes and subjected to gel stand at 25°C for 30 minutes and subjected to gel
`
`filtration on a Sephadex G-25 column (0.8X40 cm) with filtration on a Sephadex G-25 column (0.8X40 cm) with
`
`0.9% NaCI to remove low-molecular-weight materials. 0.9% NaCI to remove low-molecular-weight materials.
`
`To the resulting solution of the maleimide group(cid:173)To the resulting solution of the maleimide group(cid:173)
`
`containing aAFP [VI (lg=aAFP); 9.93 mg/ml, 2.96 ml] containing aAFP [VI (lg=aAFP); 9.93 mg/ml, 2.96 ml]
`
`were added V (0.388 mM of PLGA equivalence, 5.05 were added V (0.388 mM of PLGA equivalence, 5.05
`
`ml) and 0.5 M Na phosphate buffer, pH 6.5 (2 ml), and ml) and 0.5 M Na phosphate buffer, pH 6.5 (2 ml), and
`
`the mixture was allowed to stand at 25°C for 24 hours. the mixture was allowed to stand at 25°C for 24 hours.
`
`The generated precipitate was removed by centrifuga(cid:173)The generated precipitate was removed by centrifuga(cid:173)
`
`tion, and the solution was dialyzed against CMF-PBS tion, and the solution was dialyzed against CMF-PBS
`
`to give the aAFP-PLGA-DM conjugate [VII (lg=aAFP)]. to give the aAFP-PLGA-DM conjugate [VII (lg=aAFP)].
`
`The normal conjugate nlg-PLGA-DM was prepared The normal conjugate nlg-PLGA-DM was prepared
`
`by the same procedure from nIg (10). by the same procedure from nIg (10).
`
`Quantitation of DM and the 2-pyridyldithio end Quantitation of DM and the 2-pyridyldithio end
`
`group (Py-SS-) of PLGA.-The DM content was group (Py-SS-) of PLGA.-The DM content was
`
`determined spectrophotometrically based on absorbance determined spectrophotometrically based on absorbance
`
`at 480 nm [t;, 12,000 (15)]. The content of the 2-at 480 nm [t;, 12,000 (15)]. The content of the 2-
`
`pyridyldithio end group was determined by treatment pyridyldithio end group was determined by treatment
`
`of a sample with DTT followed by measurement of UV of a sample with DTT followed by measurement of UV
`
`absorbance at 343 nm [t;, 8,080 (16)] due to liberated absorbance at 343 nm [t;, 8,080 (16)] due to liberated
`
`pyridine-2-thione. A sample was dissolved in or diluted pyridine-2-thione. A sample was dissolved in or diluted
`to 2-3 ml of 0.1 M Na phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and
`to 2-3 ml of 0.1 M Na phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and
`treated with an excess (2 JLI) of 0.5 M DTT in 0.1 M Na
`treated with an excess (2 JLI) of 0.5 M DTT in 0.1 M Na
`
`phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and absorbance at 343 nm phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and absorbance at 343 nm
`
`was measured. was measured.
`
`Quantitation of the maleimide group introduced to Quantitation of the maleimide group introduced to
`
`19.-An aliquot of a sample (=2.5 mg) was treated 19.-An aliquot of a sample (=2.5 mg) was treated
`
`with an approximately fiftyfold molar excess of DNP(cid:173)with an approximately fiftyfold molar excess of DNP(cid:173)
`
`Cys in 0.1 M Na phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) containing Cys in 0.1 M Na phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) containing
`
`0.1 M NaCI at room temperature for 0.1 M NaCI at room temperature for
`
`I hour, and I hour, and
`
`unreacted DNP-Cys was removed by gel filtration on a unreacted DNP-Cys was removed by gel filtration on a
`
`Sephadex G-25 column (0.8X40 cm) in CMF-PBS. UV Sephadex G-25 column (0.8X40 cm) in CMF-PBS. UV
`
`absorption at 360 [t;, 17,000 (17)] and 280 nm (EI~, 14.0) absorption at 360 [t;, 17,000 (17)] and 280 nm (EI~, 14.0)
`
`was measured for the determination of the content of was measured for the determination of the content of
`the maleimide group and of the protein.
`the maleimide group and of the protein.
`
`Quantitation of 19 in conjugates.-Quantitation of Quantitation of 19 in conjugates.-Quantitation of
`
`Ig protein was performed by the Bio-Rad protein assay Ig protein was performed by the Bio-Rad protein assay
`
`(Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CaliL) (18). This (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CaliL) (18). This
`
`assay was based on the shift of absorbance maximum assay was based on the shift of absorbance maximum
`
`for an acidic solution of Coomassie brilliant blue for an acidic solution of Coomassie brilliant blue
`
`G-250 from 465 to 595 nm when binding to protein G-250 from 465 to 595 nm when binding to protein
`
`occurred. A standard curve was drawn by the use of occurred. A standard curve was drawn by the use of
`
`nlg, and correction was made with respect to the nlg, and correction was made with respect to the
`
`influence of coexistent PLGA-DM. influence of coexistent PLGA-DM.
`
`Disk PAGE.-Disk PAGE was done according to Disk PAGE.-Disk PAGE was done according to
`
`the method of Davis (19). Electrophoresis was con(cid:173)the method of Davis (19). Electrophoresis was con(cid:173)
`
`ducted in 5% polyacrylamide gel (0.5X5 cm) in 5 mM ducted in 5% polyacrylamide gel (0.5X5 cm) in 5 mM
`
`Tris-38 mM glycine buffer (pH 8.6) at 4 mA/gel for I Tris-38 mM glycine buffer (pH 8.6) at 4 mA/gel for I
`
`hour, and gels were dyed with Coomassie brilliant blue hour, and gels were dyed with Coomassie brilliant blue
`
`G-250 by the method of Burges (20). G-250 by the method of Burges (20).
`
`
`the reaction mixture was dialyzed against water and the reaction mixture was dialyzed against water and
`
`concentrated to approximately 30 ml by evaporation at concentrated to approximately 30 ml by evaporation at
`
`40°C under reduced pressure. 40°C under reduced pressure.
`
`The pH of the solution thus obtained containing a The pH of the solution thus obtained containing a
`
`mixture of Na salts of I and 3-(2-pyridyldithio)(cid:173)mixture of Na salts of I and 3-(2-pyridyldithio)(cid:173)
`
`propionyl PLGA (Py-SS-PLGA, II) was made 8.5 with propionyl PLGA (Py-SS-PLGA, II) was made 8.5 with
`
`0.1 N NaOH, and the mixture was treated with DTT 0.1 N NaOH, and the mixture was treated with DTT
`
`(73.3 mg, 0.476 mmol) at 45°C for 1.5 hours. The pH of (73.3 mg, 0.476 mmol) at 45°C for 1.5 hours. The pH of
`
`the mixture was made 2.0 with I N HCI and allowed to the mixture was made 2.0 with I N HCI and allowed to
`
`stand at 4°C for I hour. The generated precipitate was stand at 4°C for I hour. The generated precipitate was
`
`collected by centrifugation and washed with 0.01 N collected by centrifugation and washed with 0.01 N
`
`HCI to give a mixture of I and 3-mercaptopropionyl(cid:173)HCI to give a mixture of I and 3-mercaptopropionyl(cid:173)
`
`polY-L-glutamic acid (HS-PLGA, III). polY-L-glutamic acid (HS-PLGA, III).
`
`To a suspension of Thiopropyl Sepharose 6B resin To a suspension of Thiopropyl Sepharose 6B resin
`
`(Pharmacia Chemicals AB; 60 ml) in 0.1 M Na phos(cid:173)(Pharmacia Chemicals AB; 60 ml) in 0.1 M Na phos(cid:173)
`phate buffer (pH 6.0) containing I mM EDTA (100 ml)
`phate buffer (pH 6.0) containing I mM EDTA (100 ml)
`was added a solution (pH 6.0) of I and III [prepared by
`was added a solution (pH 6.0) of I and III [prepared by
`the addition of 0.1 N HCI to a solution of I and III in
`the addition of 0.1 N HCI to a solution of I and III in
`
`I N NaOH (7.0 ml)], and the mixture was stirred gently I N NaOH (7.0 ml)], and the mixture was stirred gently
`
`at room at room
`
`temperature overnight to allow temperature overnight to allow
`
`
`the the
`thiol thiol
`derivative III
`
`derivative III to bind to the resin. The resin was to bind to the resin. The resin was
`
`collected by filtration and washed with 0.01 M Na collected by filtration and washed with 0.01 M Na
`
`phosphate buffer (pH 7.5). phosphate buffer (pH 7.5).
`The resin thus obtained was stirred gently at room
`The resin thus obtained was stirred gently at room
`temperature overnight in 0.1 M Tris-HCI buffer (pH
`temperature overnight in 0.1 M Tris-HCI buffer (pH
`
`8.5) containing I mM EDTA (80 ml) with added 2-ME 8.5) containing I mM EDTA (80 ml) with added 2-ME
`(4.7 g) to liberate Na salt of III from the resin, and the
`(4.7 g) to liberate Na salt of III from the resin, and the
`
`mixture was filtered. The filtrate was made acidic (pH mixture was filtered. The filtrate was made acidic (pH
`
`1.8) with 1.8) with
`
`I N HCI, and the precipitate (III) was I N HCI, and the precipitate (III) was
`
`collected by centrifugation and washed with 0.01 N collected by centrifugation and washed with 0.01 N
`
`HCl. HCl.
`
`The polymer III was dissolved in 0.4 M Na phosphate The polymer III was dissolved in 0.4 M Na phosphate
`
`buffer (pH 7.5) containing I mM EDTA (5 ml), and the buffer (pH 7.5) containing I mM EDTA (5 ml), and the
`
`solution was diluted with 0.1 M Na phosphate buffer solution was diluted with 0.1 M Na phosphate buffer
`
`(pH 7.0) containing 1 mM EDTA (40 ml). To the (pH 7.0) containing 1 mM EDTA (40 ml). To the
`
`resulting solution was added a solution of 2-pyridyl(cid:173)resulting solution was added a solution of 2-pyridyl(cid:173)
`
`disulfide (lOS mg, 0.48 mmol) in ethanol (10 ml), and disulfide (lOS mg, 0.48 mmol) in ethanol (10 ml), and
`
`the mixture was. allowed to stand at room temperature the mixture was. allowed to stand at room temperature
`
`for 1 hour and dialyzed against water, concentrated to for 1 hour and dialyzed against water, concentrated to
`
`approximately 20 ml under reduced pressure, and approximately 20 ml under reduced pressure, and
`
`lyophilized to give Na salt of II (84.5 mg). lyophilized to give Na salt of II (84.5 mg).
`
`Binding of DM to Py-SS-PLGA and generation of Binding of DM to Py-SS-PLGA and generation of
`
`the free thiol group.-Na salt of II (75 mg, 5.86 JLmol) the free thiol group.-Na salt of II (75 mg, 5.86 JLmol)
`
`was dissolved in 3% NaCI (50 ml), and the pH was was dissolved in 3% NaCI (50 ml), and the pH was
`
`made 7.0 with 1 N NaOH. To the resulting solution made 7.0 with 1 N NaOH. To the resulting solution
`
`were added DM hydrochloride (Accurate Chemical and were added DM hydrochloride (Accurate Chemical and
`
`Scientific Corp., Hicksville, N.Y.; 42 mg, 74.6 JLmol) Scientific Corp., Hicksville, N.Y.; 42 mg, 74.6 JLmol)
`
`and EDCI (95.2 mg, 0.497 mmol), and the mixture was and EDCI (95.2 mg, 0.497 mmol), and the mixture was
`
`stirred at room temperature for 4 hours and for an stirred at room temperature for 4 hours and for an
`
`additional 4 hours after further addition of EDCI (95.2 additional 4 hours after further addition of EDCI (95.2
`
`mg). Over the whole reaction period, the pH of the mg). Over the whole reaction period, the pH of the
`
`mixture was kept at 6.5-7.5 by the addition of 1 N mixture was kept at 6.5-7.5 by the addition of 1 N
`
`HCl. The mixture was dialyzed against 0.01 M Na HCl. The mixture was dialyzed against 0.01 M Na
`
`phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and against water to give a phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and against water to give a
`
`conjugate (Py-SS-PLGA-DM, IV) of DM with II. The conjugate (Py-SS-PLGA-DM, IV) of DM with II. The
`
`solution was concentrated to 11.5 ml at 40°C under solution was concentrated to 11.5 ml at 40°C under
`reduced pressure and dialyzed against 0.01 M Na
`reduced pressure and dialyzed against 0.01 M Na
`
`phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). phosphate buffer (pH 7.0).
`
`To the above solution of IV (0.501 mM of PLGA To the above solution of IV (0.501 mM of PLGA
`
`equivalence, 10 ml) was added 0.5 M DTT in 0.5 M Na equivalence, 10 ml) was added 0.5 M DTT in 0.5 M Na
`
`
`
`JNCI. VOL. 73. NO.3. SEPTEMBER 1984 JNCI. VOL. 73. NO.3, SEPTEMBER 1984
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS Exhibit 1041 - Page 722
`
`IPR for Patent No. 8,951,962
`
`

`
`An Antlbody-Daunorublcln Conjugate
`
`723
`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at University of Chicago on September 10, 2015
`
`Ouchterlony test.-The Ouchterlony test was done
`in 1% agar in eMF-PBS. The rabbit anti-horse IgG
`antiserum used was purchased from Miles Laboratories,
`Inc., Elkhart, Ind.
`Purification of conjugates by starch-block electro(cid:173)
`phoresis.-A conjugation product was applied to a
`starch block (1.2XIOX50 cm) equilibrated with IS mM
`Na phosphate-I I mM Na tetraborate buffer (pH 8.4),
`and electrophoresis was conducted at 5 rnA for 22
`hours. The starch block was cut every I cm from one
`end, and each section was extracted two or three times
`with eMF-PBS. After analysis by disk PAGE, Ig(cid:173)
`bound PLGA-DM-rich fractions were combined, con(cid:173)
`centrated by ammonium sulfate fractionation (50% satu(cid:173)
`ration), and dialyzed against eMF-PBS. One conjugate
`product was subjected to the above starch-block electro(cid:173)
`phoresis in three portions.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Preparation of Intermediate Drug Carrier
`
`To introduce a single masked thiol, 2-pyridyldithio
`group to the N-terminal of PLGA, we treated PLGA
`with a twentyfold molar excess of SPDP at pH 7.5
`(text-fig. I). The reactivity of the terminal amino group
`was relatively low, and much of the group remained
`unreacted. The masked thiol group-containing PLGA
`was isolated from intact PLGA by use of Thiopropyl
`Sepharose 6B resin. After conversion of the masked
`thiol group to the free thiol group with DTT, the
`mixture of II and PLGA was allowed to react with the
`resin. The resin contained the active disulfide 2-pyridyl(cid:173)
`dithio groups and reacted with the thiol group of the
`modified PLGA, which was recovered from the resin by
`the disulfide exchange reaction with 2-ME.
`The pure thiol derivative III
`thus obtained was
`converted back to. the 2-pyridyldithio derivative II for
`the protection of 'the thiol group. The 2-pyridyldithio
`functional group also allowed the spectrophotometric,
`
`~SS~COtNHCHCOlnOH
`H{NHCHCOln"OH aN )
`..
`)
`C02H
`C02H
`Py-SS-PLGA, II
`~G~I
`+
`
`HS~CO{NHCHC0Tr10H d
`-L~
`)
`I
`
`I
`I
`
`•
`
`C02H
`HS-PLGA, III
`a, SPOP; b, OTT; c, Thiopropyl Sepharose 68 resin;
`2-ME; d, 2-pyridyldisulfide
`
`TEXT·FIGllRE I.-Preparation of a single
`PLGA.
`
`thio] group·containing
`
`TABLE I.-Chemical data on PLGA-DM
`and Ig-PLGA-DM conjugates·
`
`Data
`
`Average molecular
`weight of PLGA d
`Degree of polymer-
`ization of PLGA
`DM-to-PLGA
`binding ratio'
`Drug-substitution
`rate, %f
`
`PLGA-to-Ig bind-
`ing ratiog
`DM-to-Ig bind-
`ing ratioh
`
`Preparation 1 b
`
`Anti-
`AFP
`
`Normal
`
`Preparation 2'
`Anti-
`AFP
`
`Normal
`
`PLGA-DM
`
`12,800
`
`12,800
`
`15,100
`
`15,100
`
`85
`
`85
`
`100
`
`100
`
`7.0
`
`8.3
`
`7.0
`
`8.3
`
`Ig--PLGA-DM
`
`2.8
`
`19.6
`
`2.1
`
`14.7
`
`10.3
`
`10.3
`
`1.1
`
`11.8
`
`10.3
`
`10.3
`
`1.0
`
`10.3
`
`• The outline of the methods of obtaining the data is described
`to this table. For details, see "Materials and
`in footnotes
`Methods."
`b Details on this preparation are described in "Materials and
`Methods."
`<The conjugates were prepared as in preparation 1. However,
`5MBU was used for introducing the maleimide groups into Ig,
`and a fourfold molar excess of V was used for the reaction with
`VI instead of a tenfold molar excess in the case of preparation 1.
`After dialysis of the final reaction mixture against 15 mM Na
`phosphate-11 mM Na tetraborate buffer (pH 8.4), the conjugates
`were purified by starch-block electrophoresis.
`dDetermined by the end-group (2-pyridyldithio) analysis with
`respect to a lyophilized aliquot of IV.
`'The DM content (mol) was determined spectrophotometrically,
`and the PLGA content (mol) was determined by the end-group
`analysis.
`fThe average percentage of DM-Iinked carboxyl groups among
`total number of carboxyl groups in PLGA.
`g Calculated by the division of the DM-to-Ig binding ratio by
`the DM-to-PLGA binding ratio.
`h This number was obtained from mol of Ig in the conjugate
`preparation (determined by the Bio-Rad protein assay) and mol
`of antibody-linked DM as determined by the multiplication of
`the total DM content (antibody-linked DM plus DM as PLGA-DM)
`of the conjugate preparation (determined spectrophotometrically)
`by pl100 [p=purity (%) of the conjugate shown in table 2].
`
`quantitative end-group analysis by the method described
`in "Materials and Methods." The average molecular
`weight of the isolated II as determined by this method
`is shown in table I.
`
`Preparation of Ig-PLGA-DM Conjugates
`
`First the masked thiol group-containing PLGA de(cid:173)
`rivative II was treated with DM 15% equivalent to the
`carboxyl groups in the presence of the water-soluble
`carbodiimide EDeI followed by the removal of low(cid:173)
`molecular-weight materials to give
`the PLGA-DM
`conjugate (text-fig. 2). The average number of DM
`molecules linked to one molecule of PLGA (DM-to(cid:173)
`PLGA binding ratio) and the ratio (%) of the number
`
`JNCI. VOL. 73, NO.3. SEPTEMBER 1981
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS Exhibit 1041 - Page 723
`
`IPR for Patent No. 8,951,962
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at University of Chicago on September 10, 2015
`
`724 Tsukada, Kato, Umemoto, et al.
`
`QSS~CO~NHCHCOTp'-fNHCHCOlqOH
`py-SS-PLGA~
`~
`' ;
`II
`CO-OM
`C02H
`Py-SS-PLGA-OM, N
`
`t
`
`, HS-PLGA-OM ________ _
`
`V
`
`o
`Ig~ 19-tNHCO-X-NO] - - - - . .
`o
`
`I
`
`VI
`
`view that this material is a conjugate of OM with
`antibody.
`The average number of the PLGA chains linked to
`one molecule of Ig (PLGA-to-Ig molar binding ratio)
`and the average number of OM molecules conjugated
`with one molecule of Ig through PLGA (OM-to-Ig
`molar binding ratio) are listed in table 1.
`The anti-AFP and normal conjugates prepared in
`preparation 1 were used without further purification in
`biological studies. The conjugates in preparation 2 were
`used after purification by starch-block electrophoresis.
`The purities [percentages of Ig-linked OM in total
`amount of OM (Ig-linked OM plus OM as PLGA-OM)]
`of the conjugates used in the biological studies are
`shown in table 2.
`
`I 9 -fNHCO-X _N)S/'y-CO-f.NH(HCOlp"~NHCHCOlqOH ]
`o 7 ) m
`
`CO-OM
`
`COzH
`
`Ig- PLGA - OM,
`
`vn
`
`o OH
`0
`~CH3
`YVYYOH
`OM-= MeO 0 :~J
`
`H3Cf?:!:J
`HONH_
`
`e, daunomycin-EOCI; t, OTT; g, 5MBE orSMBU
`
`TEXT·FIGllRE 2.-Preparation of Ig-PLGA-OM conjugates.
`
`of drug-substituted carboxyl groups to the total number
`of drug-substituted and drug-unsubstituted carboxyl
`groups (drug-substitution rate) are shown in table 1.
`Next the maleimide group was introduced to aAFP
`with a twentyfold molar excess of 5MBE (14) or 5MBU
`(21). The modified antibody contained, on the average,
`6.7 (SMBE) and 12.1 (SMBU) maleimide groups per
`molecule of antibody as determined by the ONP-Cys
`method. After generation of the free thiol group by
`treatment with OTT, the OM-linked, masked thiol
`derivative IV was conjugated with the maleimide group(cid:173)
`containing antibody by the addition reaction of the
`thiol group to the maleimide group.
`The conjugates were subjected to disk PAGE and the
`Ouchterlony test. Text-figure 3 shows the results of the
`analysis with respect to preparation 1. In disk PAGE
`(fig. IA), negatively charged PLGA-OM migrated very
`fast (gel 5) in contrast to the slow migration of Ig (gels
`3 and 4). In addition to the band of unreacted HS(cid:173)
`PLGA-OM V, the conjugate preparation exhibited two
`new bands that were clearly different from the band of
`Ig (gels I and 2). The material extracted from these
`bands with Tris-HCI buffer (pH 8.2) containing 2 M
`NaCI and O. I % NaN 3 showed a visible absorption
`maximum at 480 nm and formed a precipitin line with
`a rabbit anti-horse IgG antiserum, which supports the
`
`JNCI. VOL. 73, NO.3, SEPTEMBER 1984
`
`10
`
`E
`"-.,
`0
`~ x
`(ji
`...J
`...J
`W
`()
`W
`
`...J co «
`:>
`
`0.1
`
`oL,
`
`o
`rl
`o
`
`I
`I
`i
`3
`0.3
`0.03
`OM CONCENTRATION tug/ml)
`I
`I
`I i i i
`i
`0.4 0.6
`. 46
`4060
`400 600
`Ig CONCENTRATION (,ug/ml)
`
`I
`
`I
`
`..
`30
`
`TEXT-FIGURE 3.-Enhanced cytotoxicity of OM when conjugated with
`aAFP. AH66 cells (5XI0· cells/ml) were cultured in Eagle's
`minimum essential medium (Nissui Seiyaku Co. Ltd., Tokyo; pH
`7.4), containing 10% heat-inactivated calf serum (Flow Labora(cid:173)
`tories, Stanmore, Australia), kanamycin sulfate (6 ~g/rril), and a
`serially diluted test sample (conjugates used were those listed under
`preparation 2 in table I) in a 96-well MicroTest tissue culture plate
`(Falcon Plastics No. 3040) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% C02
`in air at 37°C for 48 hr, and the viable cells were counted by the
`trypan blue dye-exclusion method. 0, nlg; 0, aAFP; X, OM; 0,
`PLGA-OM; ., nlg-PLGA-OM; ., aAFP-PLGA-OM. Points,
`means of triplicate determinations; bars, SE (indicated unless
`smaller than the points as plotted).
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS Exhibit 1041 - Page 724
`
`IPR for Patent No. 8,951,962
`
`

`
`Downloaded from
`
`http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/
`
` at University of Chicago on September 10, 2015
`
`An Antibody-Daunorubicin Conjugate 725
`
`MST became 34.9±1.58 and 45.1±2.78 days, respectively.
`The tumor-neutralizing effect of the two nonspecific
`macromolecular DM derivatives PLGA-DM and normal
`conjugate [MST, 39.3±1.45 and 38.3±2.85 days, respec(cid:173)
`tively] was about the same as that of free DM (MST,
`45.l±2.78 days). No significant synergistic effect was
`observed between aAFP and free DM (MST of the
`mixture-of-the-two group, 48.0±3.24 days). The group
`that showed the highest survival rate was the group
`inoculated with the cells preincubated with anti-AFP
`conjugate, and 2 of 8 rats were 70-day survivors, with
`MST of the 6 dead rats being 52.5±3.70 days. The
`tumor-neutralizing effect of the anti-AFP conjugate was
`statistically significant over the effect of either DM
`alone (P<'05) or normal conjugate (P<'OI), even with
`the assumption that two 70-day survivors died on
`day 70.
`
`Therapeutic Effect of Anti-AFP Conjugate
`
`For assessment of the in vivo antitumor activity of
`anti-AFP conjugate on ascites AH66 tumor, DONRYU
`rats, which had been inoculated ip with lXlO4 AH66
`cells (day 0), were treated with an ip injection of test
`materials every other day starting from day 3 for a total
`of 3 . (experiment A, text-fig. 5A) or 5 (experiment B,
`text-fig. 5B) doses. The survival was followed until day
`70 (A) or day 100 (B). The test materials used in
`experiments A and B are those listed under prepara(cid:173)
`tions I and 2 in table I, respectively.
`The aAFP prolonged the lives of AH66 tumor-bearing
`rats (P<'OOI) [MST: A, 31.9±1.91 days; B, 37.0±2.7I
`days (MST of the untreated group: 15.5± 1.22 days)],
`
`100,'----T--.--.-. . --.~
`
`...J
`
`;g;
`~ 50
`:J en
`cf.
`
`o I
`o
`
`10
`
`20
`
`30
`
`"
`40
`
`X "
`50
`
`60
`
`70
`
`DAYS AFTER TUMOR CELL INOCULATION
`
`TEXT-FlGI1RE 4.-Tumor·neutralizing activity of anti-AFP conjugate
`against AH66 tumor. AH66 cells (lXI05 cells/ml of PBS) were
`incubated with PBS (--). nlg (2.500. -0-). aAFP (2.500. -0-).
`OM (500. -X-i. PLGA-OM (500. -0-). mixture of aAFP and OM
`(2.500-500. -A-). nlg-PLGA-OM (2.2\0-560. -.-). or aAFP(cid:173)
`PLGA-OM (2.070-560, -e-) at 37°C for 30 min. The PBS cell
`suspension (0.1 ml) containing IX\04 treated cells was injected ip
`into OONRYU rats. Survival was followed for 70 days. Numbers in
`parentheses in this legend indicate the concentration (}lg/ml) of the
`test materials. For the Ig-PLGA-OM conjugates and the mixture
`of aAFP and OM, two numbers are given for the concentrations of
`Ig and of OM in this order. The conjugates used are those listed
`under preparation I in table I.
`
`JNCI. VOL. 73. NO.3. SEPTEMBER 1984
`
`TABLE 2.-Purity of conjugate preparation used
`in biological studies·
`
`Preparation
`
`1
`2
`
`Purity, %
`
`Anti-AFP
`conjugate
`
`27
`62
`
`Normal
`conjugate
`
`22
`78
`
`a Purity denotes the percentage (p) of Ig-linked DM to total
`amount of DM (Ig-linked DM plus DM as PLGA-DM), and it
`was determined as follows: The conjugate preparations were
`subjected to disk PAGE; in the case of preparation 1, Ig-(cid:173)
`PLGA-DM and PLGA-DM were extracted from the correspond(cid:173)
`ing bands with 0.1 M Tris-HCI buffer (pH 8.2) containing 2 M
`NaCI and 0.1% NaN); in the case of preparation 2, Ig--PLGA-DM
`and PLGA-DM were isolated from the gel by further electro(cid:173)
`phoresis. The contents of DM extracted in the two forms,
`Ig--PLGA-DM and PLGA-DM, were determined spectrophoto(cid:173)
`metrically.
`
`In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Anti-AFP Conjugate
`
`The cytotoxicity of the aAFP-PLGA-DM conjugate
`against hepatoma AH66 cells was assessed by
`the
`determination of the inhibition of the in vitro growth
`of the AH66 cells that were cultured, with the conjugate
`being added to the medium (text-fig. 3). This inhibition
`was compared with the inhibitions obtained with nlg,
`aAFP, unconjugated DM, PLGA-DM, and the nlg(cid:173)
`PLGA-DM conjugate.
`The anti-AFP conjugate exhibited potent concentra(cid:173)
`tion-dependent cytotoxicity and inhibited the cell growth
`or killed the cells at concentrations above 0.3 J.Lg
`(equivalent DM)/ml, whereas normal conjugate showed
`only moderate cytotoxicity. Unconjugated aAFP showed
`even weaker cytotoxicity, though it did show some
`cytotoxicity as compared with the cytotoxicity shown
`by nlg. These results indicate that the potent cyto(cid:173)
`toxicity of anti-AFP conjugate is due to both the
`toxicity of the OM portion and the antigen (AFP)(cid:173)
`binding activity of the aAFP portion.
`The cytotoxicities of PLGA-DM and of nlg(cid:173)
`PLGA-DM were about the same as the cytotoxicity of
`free DM, and the cytotoxicities of these three were
`less than the cytotoxicity of the anti-AFP conjugate;
`i.e., the cytotoxicity of DM was enhanced only when
`conjugated with aAFP via PLGA.
`
`Tumor-Neutralizing Activity of Antl-AFP Conjugate
`
`For the assessment of the tumor-neutralizing activity
`of anti-AFP conjugate by the Winn test (22), groups of
`DONRYU rats were inoculated ip with lXI04 AH66
`cells that had been preincubated with test materials
`(materials tested were those in preparation I, table I) at
`37°C for 30 minutes, and the survival was followed
`(text-fig. 4). MST (±SE) of rats that received the cells
`preincubated with PBS or nlg were 17 .9±0. 72 and
`22.1±0.95 days, respectively. The rats that received the
`cells treated with aAFP or unconjugated DM survived
`considerably longer than the PBS group (P<'OOI), and
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS Exhibit 1041 - Page 725
`
`IPR for Patent No. 8,951,962
`
`

`
`726 Tsukada, Kato, Umemoto, et al.
`
`100
`
`A
`
`I I
`
`(A, P<'05; B, P<'OI), normal conjugate (P

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket