throbber
THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
`
`Vol. 268, No. 26, Issue of September 15, pp. 19650-19655,1993
`Printed in U.S.A.
`
`Exendin-4 Is a High Potency Agonist and Truncated Exendin-(9-39)-
`amide an Antagonist at the Glucagon-like Peptide 1-(7-36)-amide
`Receptor of Insulin-secreting ,&Cells*
`
`(Received for publication, March 5, 1993, and in revised form, May 7, 1993)
`
`Riidiger Goke, Hans-Christoph Fehmann, Thomas LinnS, Harald Schmidt, Michael Krause9,
`John EngT, and Burkhard GokeII
`From the Departments of Internal Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, 3550 Marburg, the $Justus-Liebig University of
`Giessen, 6300 Giessen, the §Microchemistry Unit of the Institute of Molecular Biology and Cancer Research, 3550 Marburg,
`Germany and the Wolomon A. Berson Research Laboratory, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, New York 10468
`
`Exendin-4 purified from Heloderma suspecturn
`venom shows structural relationship to the important
`incretin hormone
`glucagon-like peptide 1-(7-36)-
`amide (GLP-1). We demonstrate that exendin-4 and
`truncated exendin-(9-39)-amide specifically interact
`with the GLP-1 receptor on insulinoma-derived cells
`and on lung membranes.
`Exendin-4 displaced "'I-
`GLP- 1, and unlabeled GLP- 1 displaced lZ6I-exendin-4
`from the binding
`site at rat insulinoma-derived
`RINmSF cells. Exendin-4 had,
`like GLP-1, a pro-
`nounced effect on intracellular CAMP generation,
`which was reduced by exendin-(9-39)-amide. When
`combined, GLP-1 and exendin-4 showed additive ac-
`tion on CAMP. They each competed
`with the radio-
`labeled version of the other peptide in
`cross-linking
`experiments. The apparent molecular mass of the re-
`spective ligand-binding protein complex was 63,000
`Da. Exendin-(9-39)-amide abolished the cross-linking
`of both peptides. Exendin-4, like GLP-1, stimulated
`dose dependently the glucose-induced insulin
`wcre-
`tion in isolated rat
`islets, and, in mouse insulinoma
`@TC-1 cells, both peptides stimulated the proinsulin
`gene expression at the level of transcription. Exendin-
`(9-39)-amide reduced these
`effects. In conclusion,
`exendin-4 is an agonist and exendin-(9-39)-amide is
`a specific GLP- 1 receptor antagonist.
`
`glucagon show some sequence homology to GLP-1,' these
`peptides exhibit no interactions with the recently discovered
`(61, biochemically characterized (6-8), and cloned (9) GLP-1
`receptor. We have previously studied the insulin stimulatory
`action of the reptile peptide helodermin, which was isolated
`from Gila monster venom (lo), because of the striking struc-
`tural homology of helodermin and GLP-1. Since helodermin
`induced only a weak stimulatory effect on insulin secretion
`(lo), the question of whether this peptide interacts with
`endocrine pancreatic islet GLP-1 receptors was not further
`addressed.
`The venom of the lizard Gila monster contains several
`bioactive peptides. Helodermin was isolated from Heloderma
`suspecturn venom and the helospectins I and I1 from Helod-
`erma horridurn (11,12). In recent studies, two new biologically
`active peptides, exendin-3 (13) and -4 (14) have been identi-
`fied from Helodermatidae venoms (15, 16). In our search for
`naturally occurring GLP-1 receptor agonists/antagonists, we
`became interested in the exendins, because exendin-3 and -4
`have been shown to enhance insulin secretion when infused
`in dogs (17). Most interestingly, the exendins share a 53%
`sequence homology with GLP-l-(7-36)-amide.
`Consequently, we investigated whether the putative biolog-
`ical action of exendin-4 at the endocrine pancreas is mediated
`by GLP-l-(7-36)-amide receptors. For this, we utilized as P-
`cell models the well characterized rat insulinoma-derived
`RINm5F cell line (18) in which we previously discovered GLP-
`1-(7-36)-amide receptors (6). Studies with mouse insulinoma-
`derived PTC-1 cells have been included to test for effects on
`proinsulin gene regulation. In order to complete those inves-
`tigations of insulinotropic effects, we looked at insulin secre-
`tion studies with normal islets. It was also intriguing to find
`out whether truncated exendin-(9-39)-amide behaves as a
`GLP-1 receptor antagonist at the @-cell as was suggested for
`acinar cells of the guinea pig exocrine pancreas (16).
`Rat lung membranes also possess GLP-l-(7-36)-amide
`receptors with biochemical properties that are somewhat dif-
`ferent from the P-cell receptors on RINm5F cells (19-21). We
`found these receptors localized to mucus glands in the trachea
`and on smooth muscle of the pulmonary artery (22) and
`believe that they contribute to the non-adrenergic non-cholin-
`ergic peptidergic regulation of lung function. It was therefore
`of additional interest to study the interaction of exendin-4
`and GLP-l-(7-36)-amide with the GLP-1 lung receptor.
`
`The abbreviations used are: GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide 1; KRB,
`Krebs-Ringer buffer.
`
`~~
`
`Intestinal peptide hormones, released into the circulation
`after a meal, are important augmentors of the postprandial
`insulin release stimulated by absorbed nutrients (incretin
`effect) (1, 2). Glucagon-like peptide 1-(7-37)/(7-36)-amide is
`now identified as probably the most important hormonal
`mediator in this enteroinsular axis and in glucose homeostasis
`(3, 4). This peptide is derived from the intestinal posttrans-
`lational proglucagon processing and is a member of an ex-
`tended family of bioactive peptides, the glucagon-secretin-
`vasoactive intestinal polypeptide family, all of which are
`closely related one to the other in their amino acid sequences
`(3, 5). Although mammalian peptides such as secretin and
`* This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
`Grants Go 492/2-1 (to R. G.) and Go 417/3-1 (to B. G.) The costs of
`publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of
`page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "adver-
`tisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate
`this fact.
`11 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of
`Molecular Endocrinology, Division of Gastroenterology and Metab-
`olism, Dept. of Internal Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg,
`Baldinger Str., W-3550 Marburg, Germany. Fax: 49-6421-285648.
`
`19650
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS Exhibit 1018 - Page 19650
`
`IPR for Patent No. 8,951,962
`
`

`
`TABLE I
`K d values of binding experiments with RINm5F cells and
`rat lung membranes
`Kd
`RINm5F cell experiments
`Inhibition of '"I-GLP-1 (7-36) amide binding by
`3.45 f 0.7 X 10"' M
`GLP-1 (7-36) amide
`1.36 f 0.4 X 10"' M
`Exendin-4
`2.99 f 0.7 X IO-' M
`Exendin (9-39) amide
`Inhibition of 12sI-exendin-4 binding by
`4.27 f 0.7 X io-' M
`GLP-1 (7-36) amide
`2.73 f 0.3 X 10"' M
`Exendin-4
`3.99 -+ 1.2 x lo-' M
`Exendin (9-39) amide
`Kd
`Lung membranes
`Inhibition of 1251-GLP-1 (7-36) amide binding by
`3.93 f 0.2 X 1o"o M
`GLP-1 (7-36) amide
`1.34 f 0.2 X 10"' M
`Exendin-4
`5.25 f 0.3 X IO-' M
`Exendin (9-39) amide
`Inhibition of '261-exendin-4 binding by
`7.65 f 1.4 X 10"' M
`GLP-1 (7-36) amide
`2.55 f 0.3 X 10"' M
`Exendin-4
`6.88 f 1.6 X lo-' M
`Exendin (9-39) amide
`
`100
`
`B
`
`6c
`
`20
`
`O
`
`-11 -10 -8
`
`-s
`
`-7 -8
`
`100
`
`2
`4 80
`a
`P 60
`B
`i
`
`40
`
`I
`
`6c
`
`20
`
`0
`
`100
`
`a 2 80
`a
`B U 60
`-
`Y i 40
`
`6c 20
`
`-8 -8 -7
`-11 -10
`-6
`Peptide log (M)
`
`\
`
`Exendins on GLP-1 Receptor of Islet P-Cells
`19651
`(Munchen, Germany);
`NaIz6I from Amersham-Buchler (Braun-
`schweig, Germany); human serum albumin from Behring (Marburg,
`Germany); bacitracin from Serva (Heidelberg, Germany).
`RINm5F (23) and flC-1 (28) cells were grown in plastic culture
`bottles under conditions as previously described. Before experimen-
`tation, cells were detached from the bottles using phosphate-buffered
`saline (NaC1, 136 mM; KC1, 2.7 mM; NazHP04, 8.1 mM; KHzPO,, 1.5
`mM, pH 7.3) containing 0.7 mM EDTA.
`Lung membranes were prepared as described in detail previously
`(8). Rat lungs were homogenized, and the homogenate was layered
`over a 41% (w/v) sucrose solution and centrifuged at 4 "C for 60 min
`at 100,000 X g. The band at the interface of the layers represented
`the membranes and was collected, diluted, and centrifuged at 4 "C for
`30 min at 40,000 X g. The pellet was resuspended in a modified Krebs-
`Ringer buffer (KRB) (Tris-HC1,2.5 mM; NaC1,120 mM; MgSO4,1.2
`mM; KCl, 5 mM; CH3COONa, 15 mM, pH 7.4) containing 1% (w/v)
`human serum albumin, 0.1% (w/v) bacitracin, and 1 mM EDTA
`frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 'C. Protein concentration
`was determined as described by Bradford (24).
`12'I-GLP-1-(7-36)-amide was prepared as described previously (6).
`Iodination of exendin-4 was carried out using a modification of this
`method. Briefly, exendin-4 (5 pg/5 pl of 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic
`acid) was diluted with 95 pl of sodium phosphate buffer (0.2 mM, pH
`7.5) and was added to a microcentrifuge tube containing a film of
`iodogen. The reaction was started by addition of 1 mCi Na'"1
`and
`proceeded for 3 min at 20 "C. The crude tracer was then injected onto
`a C18 Nova-pak reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatogra-
`phy column (0.46 X 15 cm; Waters Associates, Milford, MA) equili-
`brated at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min 0.1% trifluoro acetic acid. The
`concentration of acetonitrile in the eluting solvent was raised to 70%
`(v/v) over 60 min. The peak of radiolabeled tracer was stored at
`-20 'C. Under the conditions of chromatography, labeled peptide was
`separated from unlabeled peptide, and the specific activity of the
`label was estimated to be approximately 65 TBq/mmol.
`Binding assays were performed as follows. RINm5F cells were
`detached from the culture bottles, were centrifuged (100 X g, 5 min),
`and the pellet was resuspended in KRB. Cells (-lo6) or lung mem-
`branes (1 mg of protein/ml) were incubated in KRB at 37 "C with
`radiolabeled peptide in the absence and presence of a range of
`concentrations of unlabeled peptide. After 30 min, the reaction was
`stopped by centrifugation of sample aliquots through an oil layer (6).
`Cell surface-associated radioactivity in the pellet was determined
`using a y-counter. Specific binding was calculated as the difference
`between the amount of 1261-GLP-1-(7-36)-amide or lZ6I-exendin-4
`bound in the absence (total binding) and presence (nonspecific bind-
`ing) of 1 p~ unlabeled GLP-1 or exendin-4, respectively.
`Cross-linking experiments were carried out as described previously
`(7, 20). Briefly, plasma membranes (1 mg of protein/ml) were incu-
`bated with '261-GLP-1-(7-36)-amide or 12SI-exendin-4 (-8 X 10' c.p.m.
`each) in 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.5 containing 0.02% (w/v) human
`serum albumin for 30 min at 37 "C in the presence and absence of
`unlabeled peptides (see Fig. 2). After centrifugation for 5 min at
`10,000 X g and 4 "C, the pellet was resuspended in ice-cold 10 mM
`HEPES, 300 mM mannitol buffer (pH 9.0). Disuccinimidyl suberate
`dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide was added to give a final concentration
`of 0.1 mM. After an incubation of 10 min at 0 'C, the reaction was
`terminated by addition of ammonium acetate (final concentration, 10
`mM), the membranes were centrifuged, and the pellets were resus-
`pended in HEPES-mannitol buffer (pH 7.5). An incubation for 30
`min at 25 "C was carried out in order to dissociate noncovalently
`bound tracer. After centrifugation, pellets were resuspended in 10
`mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 2% (w/v) SDS.
`Samples were boiled for 5 min in the presence of 5% (v/v) mercap-
`toethanol. Electrophoresis was carried out as described by Laemmli
`(25). After drying, gels were exposed to Kodak type AR film for up
`to 2 weeks at -80 "C using a light-intensifying screen.
`CAMP concentrations were determined as previously described (6).
`Briefly, cells (-lo6) in 500 pl of buffer (NaCl, 113 mM; KCl, 4.7 mM;
`KHzPO4, 1.2 mM; HEPES, 10 mM; CaClZ, 2.5 mM; MgSO,,
`1.2 mM,
`pH 7.4) containing 0.1% (w/v) human serum albumin were incubated
`for 3 min at 37 "C in the presence and absence of peptide. The
`reaction was stopped by addition of ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (12%)
`(w/v) and sonification of the sample. CAMP concentrations were
`determined using a kit from Du Pont-New England Nuclear according
`to the manufacturer's instructions.
`Rat pancreatic islets were isolated aseptically by collagenase and
`discontinuous Ficoll density gradient centrifugation at 800 X g for 10
`min (26). Islets were maintained overnight at 37 "C, pH 7.4, in a gas
`
`-6
`
`0
`
`-11 -10 -8 -8 -7
`Peptide log (M)
`Peptide log (M)
`FIG. 1. Binding experiments were performed for 30 min at
`37 "C. The tracer concentrations utilized amounted to 150 PM. In
`RIN cell experiments, 25% of total radioactivity was specifically
`bound (in lung membrane experiments, 8%). For the respective Kd
`values, see Table I. A, binding of '2'-I-GLP-1-(7-36)-amide to
`RINm5F cells. Labeled GLP-1 was concentration-dependently dis-
`placed by unlabeled GLP-l-(7-36)-amide, exendin-4, and exendin-
`(9-39)-amide. Data show means of six experiments. B, binding of
`I-exendin-4 to RINm5F cells. The order of potency of displacement
`by the unlabeled peptides was exendin-4 > GLP-1= exendin-(9-39)-
`amide. Shown are means of six experiments. C, inhibition of "'-1-
`GLP-l-(7-36)-amide binding to lung membranes by exendin-4, GLP-
`1, and exendin-(9-39)-amide (means of six experiments). D, inhibi-
`tion of 125-I-exendin-4 binding to lung membranes by exendin-4,
`GLP-1, and exendin-(9-39)-amide (means of six experiments).
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Exendin-4, exendin-(9-39)-amide, and [Y3']exendin-4 were syn-
`thesized as has been detailed before (16). Briefly, the peptides were
`produced on solid-phase support (PAL resin) utilizing activated N-
`(9-fluorenyl)methoxycarbonyl amino acids on a Milligen 9050 peptide
`synthesizer (Milligen, Burlington, MA) and were purified by prepar-
`ative high pressure liquid chromatography.
`All other peptides were purchased from Bachem (Heidelberg, Ger-
`many). Iodogen and disuccinimidyl suberate was from Pierce
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS Exhibit 1018 - Page 19651
`
`IPR for Patent No. 8,951,962
`
`

`
`19652
`
`Exendins on GLP-1 Receptor of Islet @-Cells
`
`94
`
`67
`
`43
`
`67
`
`43
`
`l2%-GLP-1
`I2%-Exendin-4
`FIG. 2. Autoradiographs of 1261-GLP-1-(7-36)-amide (left panel) and l2'1-exendin-4 (right panel) cross-linked to receptors
`solubilized from RINm5F cell membranes. RINm5F cell membranes were incubated for 30 min at 37 "C with T-GLP-1 (kft) or lz5I-
`exendin-4 (right) in the absence (first l a n e ) or presence of unlabeled peptides. The membranes were then pelleted, washed, and cross-linked
`(0.1 mM disuccinimidyl suberate) for 10 min at 4 "C followed by SDS-electrophoresis. The autoradiograph presented is representative of three
`separate experiments. The mobilities of phosphorylase b (molecular mass, 94 kDa), human serum albumin (67 kDa), and ovalbumin (43 kDa)
`are indicated by the numbers at the left of the respective panek.
`
`phase of 5% CO:, in air in plastic tissue culture dishes, each containing
`5 ml of RPMI 1640 (Flow Lab, Irivine, UK) supplemented with 11
`mM glucose and 10% fetal calf serum. Insulin secretion was measured
`in static incubations. Batches of 10 islets were incubated for 45 min
`in a gently shaking water bath (37 "C) in tubes containing 500 pl of
`KRB buffer solution (pH 7.4) supplemented with 2 mg/ml bovine
`serum albumin (Sigma), 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose, and varying
`concentrations of GLP-l-(7-36)-amide and exendin-4. Incubation
`was preceded by a 30-min preincubation period in glucose-free me-
`dium. Insulin was analyzed by radioimmunoassay utilizing rat insulin
`as standard (Novo, Mainz, Germany). The assay sensitivity was 5
`microunits/ml, the interassay variance was 11.8%, and the intraassay
`variance amounted to 9.7%. Mean protein content of 10 rat islets was
`4.95 ? 0.84 pg.
`The effect of exendin-4 on proinsulin biosynthesis was studied in
`flC-1 cells, as has been detailed before (27). Briefly, cells were
`transfected with the rat insulin I promotor-indicator plasmid using
`the diethylaminoethyl-dextran method. The plasmid contained 410
`base pairs of the rat insulin I gene promotor fused to the transcrip-
`tional reporter gene encoding the bacterial enzyme chloramphenicol
`acetyltransferase. The plasmid was constructed by linking the PuuII/
`RsaI fragment (-140 to +65) of the rat insulin I gene into the vector
`PO-CAT. Chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activities were deter-
`mined according to routine procedures (27). Chloramphenicol acetyl-
`transferase activities were determined in 55 pl of cell lysates, and
`incubation with the assay mixture (27) was carried out for 120 min.
`Treatment of cells with exendin-4, GLP-1, or exendin-(9-39)-amide
`was started immediately after transfections and continued for 24 h
`according to (27).
`Scatchard analysis was done using a version of the program LI-
`GAND modified for the IBM PC (G. A. McPherson, Elsevier-Biosoft,
`Cambridge, UK). Statistical analysis was performed using Student's
`t test for paired data. Data are expressed as means f S.E. p values of
`less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.
`
`RESULTS
`Binding Experiments-See Table I. Binding of '251-GLP-1-
`(7-36)-amide to RINm5F cells was inhibited concentration-
`dependently by unlabeled GLP-l-(7-36)-amide, exendin-4,
`and exendin-(9-39)-(Fig. L4). Binding of lZ5I-exendin-4 to
`RINm5F cells was also inhibited concentration-dependently
`by the peptides (Fig. 1B); the order of potency was exendin-
`4 > GLP-l-(7-36)-amide = exendin (9-39).
`Using lz5I-GLP-l-(7-36)-amide in binding studies with lung
`membranes, the order of potency of peptides displacing the
`tracer from its binding sites was exendin-4 > GLP-1-(7-36)-
`amide > exendin-(9-39)-(Fig. IC). In experiments with lZ5I-
`exendin-4, unlabeled exendin-4 was most potent in displacing
`the tracer followed by GLP-l-(7-36)-amide and exendin-(9-
`39)-(Fig. 1D).
`Vasoactive intestinal peptide and peptide histidine isoleu-
`cine in concentrations up to 1 phd were not able to displace
`'"I-exendin-4 from its binding sites on lung membranes (data
`not shown).
`Cross-linking Experiments-Incubation of RINm5F plasma
`membranes with 1251-GLP-1-(7-36)-amide followed by chem-
`ical cross-linking and solubilization identified a single ligand-
`binding protein complex with an apparent molecular mass of
`63,000 Da (Fig. 2, left). This band was not detectable when
`the incubations were carried out in the presence of 1 ~ L M
`unlabeled GLP-l-(7-36)-amide. Furthermore, addition of un-
`or exendin-(9-39)-amide abolished
`labeled exendin-4 (1 p ~ )
`
`the specific labeling of the binding site. The same was true
`for experiments with lz5I-exendin-4 (Fig. 2, right). The ligand-
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS Exhibit 1018 - Page 19652
`
`IPR for Patent No. 8,951,962
`
`

`
`19653
`
`,
`-7 [
`
`I ~ u l
`
`
`
`-9
`
`-8
`
`
`
` -12 -11 -10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exendins on
`
`220
`
`1
`
`10 GLP-l(7-36)
`0 Exendin-4
`+ Exendin(9-39)
`V GLP-l(7-36)
`
`!
`
`GLP-1 Receptor of Islet P-Cells
`90 .
`
`0 Ex 4
`
`0 E X 4 +
`100 nu Ex 9-39
`
`=
`"
`S s
`
`0
`
`R VI o al
`
`VI
`
`8o
`
`70 -
`-
`60
`-
`50
`
`30 40
`
`.c -
`- : 20 -
`- -
`S .- - 10 -
`=
`
`/!/I\{
`0 - €&-€
`
`-
`
`-
`e
`5
`
`c
`
`-10
`
`-9
`
`-8
`
`-7
`
`-6
`
`Peptide log [ M I
`FIG. 3. Effects of GLP-l-(7-36)-amide, exendin-4, exen-
`din-(9-39)-amide, and combinations of GLP-l/exendin-4
`with truncated exendin-(9-39)-amide on the intracellular
`generation of cAMP in RINm5F cells (means 2 S.E. of six
`experiments). At concentrations of 1 and 10 nM, exendin-4 was
`more effective than GLP-1 ( p < 0.05).
`
`0
`
`LC
`
`m
`0 ) -
`2
`.- 2
`v) - c
`
`3
`
`0 OW-1
`m GW-1 +
`0.1 nu Ex 9-39
`A OW-1 +
`100 nu EX 0-30
`
`90
`
`80 -
`
`70 -
`-
`60
`50 -
`
`4 0 -
`30 -
`-
`20
`l a -
`
`0 -
`
`-
`0 -
`
`220 I
`
`200 -
`
`-
`
`n 0
`
`Y-
`
`180 -
`
`160 -
`
`CW-1(7-36)
`Exendin-4
`Q GLF"l(7-36)
`+ Exendin 4
`
`I
`
`I
`I
`I
`-8
`-12
`-11
`-10
`-9
`-7
`FIG. 5. Effect of exendin-4 (Ex 4 ) (upper panel) and GLP-
`1-(7-36)-amide (lower panel) in the absence or presence of
`truncated exendin-(9-39)-amide (Ex 9-39) on glucose-in-
`duced (10 mM) insulin secretion from isolated rat islets (means
`f S.E. of six experiments).
`
`t l o g u l
`
`140
`
`8?
`a
`2
`9 120
`-
`
`-
`
`tn
`
`l o o 80
`
`0.1 nM
`FIG. 4. The combined effect of GLP-1-(7-36)-amide plus
`exendin-4 (0.1 and 1 nM and 1 M) on intracellular cAMP
`generation in RINm5F cells. Given are means f S.E. of six
`experiments.
`
`protein complex identified in experiments with '251-exendin-
`4 showed the same apparent molecular mass as has been
`found with lZ5I-GLP-1-(7-36)-amide, and its
`labeling was
`antagonized by an excess of unlabeled GLP-1 or exendin-4.
`Cross-linking experiments with lung membranes had an
`identical outcome (data not shown). However, the apparent
`molecular mass of the binding sites in lung for exendin-4 and
`GLP-l-(7-36)-amide was 55,000 Da. This difference in mo-
`lecular masses between the GLP-1 receptor of RINm5F cells
`and lung has been described before (21).
`Determination of CAMP Concentrations-Exendin-4
`seemed slightly more efficient in stimulating cAMP produc-
`tion in RINm5F cells than GLP-l-(7-36)-amide (Fig. 3). The
`action of both, exendin-4 and GLP-l-(7-36)-amide, was in-
`
`hibited by exendin-(9-39)-amide (1 p ~ ) . Truncated exendin-
`
`(9-39)-amide alone did not alter the cAMP levels (Fig. 3). If
`GLP-l-(7-36)-amide and exendin-(9-39)-amide were used in
`
`equimolar concentrations (1 p ~ ) , exendin-(9-39)-amide could
`not block the effect of GLP-l-(7-36)-amide on cAMP gener-
`ation (Fig. 3). The combination of GLP-l-(7-36)-amide and
`exendin-4 showed an additive effect on cAMP levels when
`compared with the effect of each peptide alone (Fig. 4).
`Insulin Release Stimulated by GLP-l-(7-36)-Amide and Ex-
`endin-4"Insulin secretion in the presence of 10 mM glucose
`and in the absence of GLP-1-(7-36)-amide or exendin-4 (con-
`trols) was 154 +- 31 microunits/pg of protein/h. (Insulin
`secretion at 2.8 mM glucose was 38 k 18 units/g of protein/
`h.) In normal islets, both peptides, exendin-4 and GLP-1-(7-
`36)-amide, dose dependently enhanced the glucose-induced
`insulin release (Fig. 5 ) . The stimulatory effect of exendin-4
`became significant (p < 0.05) at a concentration of 10"'
`M
`and was strongly inhibited by
`M exendin-(9-39)-amide
`over the whole range of exendin-4 concentrations tested (Fig.
`5, upper panel).
`Fig. 5 (lower panel) demonstrates
`that exendin-(9-39)-
`amide dose dependently reduced the insulin stimulatory effect
`of GLP-l-(7-36)-amide.
`Combinations of submaximal concentrations of GLP-1 and
`exendin-4 (10"' M, respectively) showed, as in the cAMP
`experiments (Fig. 4), an additive stimulatory effect on insulin
`secretion (data not shown). At low glucose levels (2.8 mM
`glucose), GLP-1 and exendin-4 left the insulin release unal-
`tered.
`Effect on Proinsulin Gene Promotor Activity-PTC-1 cells
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS Exhibit 1018 - Page 19653
`
`IPR for Patent No. 8,951,962
`
`

`
`19654
`
`200
`
`Exendin 4
`GLP 1
`
`T
`
`Exendins on GLP-1 Receptor of Islet &Cells
`
`DISCUSSION
`Gut endocrinology faces the dilemma that the classic ap-
`proach of endocrinology to evaluate the significance of an
`endocrine organ or system simply by its removal is not pos-
`sible. The GLP-1 generating and releasing L-cells belong to
`the diffuse endocrine system of the gut (28). Although it was
`possible to collect a wealth of data concerning the GLP-1
`action at its target cells (3-5,29), the assumption of a possible
`importance of this gut hormone within the enteroinsular axis
`is mainly based on indirect evidence. A direct proof would be
`possible when a selective blockade or induction of the GLP-1
`action could be facilitated. Our data now offer the possibility
`to employ exendin-(9-39)-amide as a potent antagonist and
`exendin-4 as a efficient agonist for such studies.
`Exendin-4 is a 39-amino acid peptide that has been purified
`from H. suspecturn venom (14). It shares 53% structure ho-
`mology with GLP-1-(7-36)-amide. Furthermore, a previous
`report in this journal presented the concept that GLP-1 binds
`at exendin receptors on pancreatic acinar cells (16). There-
`fore, we studied whether the exendins and GLP-1 share the
`same receptor on endocrine pancreatic P-cells. It is probably
`not more than a semantic problem whether such a putative
`common receptor is primarily addressed as GLP-1 or, instead,
`as an exendin receptor. However, GLP-1 is, at least for the
`moment, the single candidate as the endogenous ligand for
`this receptor. The association of exendin and GLP-1 is remi-
`niscent of other examples of non-mammalian peptides that
`have mammalian homologues. For example, the amphibian
`peptides bombesin and cerulein have been matched with the
`mammalian gastrin-releasing peptide and cholecystokinin,
`respectively. As for these other examples, the shared biological
`properties of GLP-1 and exendin-4 are probably based upon
`their homologues’ primary structures.
`Our data indicate that exendin-4 and GLP-l-(7-36)-amide
`compete for the same binding site on RINm5F cells. Exendin-
`4 even binds with higher affinity to RINm5F cells than GLP-
`1-(7-36)-amide. Binding of both peptides was inhibited by
`exendin (9-39). Cross-linking of the binding proteins with
`radioactive labeled exendin-4 and GLP-l-(7-36)-amide
`re-
`vealed the same molecular mass for both ligand-protein com-
`plexes. Receptor binding of exendin-4 and GLP-1-(7-36)-
`amide appears to be associated with stimulation of CAMP
`production and potentiation of the glucose-induced insulin
`release. Truncated exendin-(9-39)-amide antagonized each of
`these biological effects of both peptides. Furthermore, exen-
`din-4, like GLP-1, stimulated the proinsulin gene promotor
`activity, whereas exendin-(9-39)-amide reduced this action.
`However, after repeated and prolonged administration over
`24 h, truncated exendin-(9-39)-amide seems to exhibit a
`partial agonistic activity on proinsulin promotor activation.
`In this context, the use of [Y3’]exendin-4 deserves also a
`further comment. In preliminary experiments, we and others
`(13) have found that the addition of tyrosine at the position
`39 does not significantly alter the effect of exendin-4 on
`intracellular CAMP. On the other hand, it appears that the
`10-fold increases in the Kd shown for GLP-1 and exendin-4
`in RIN cells when radiolabeled exendin-4 was used as tracer
`(as compared with when labeled GLP-1 was utilized as tracer)
`could indicate some complexity in the use of the labeled
`analogue in binding studies, which suggests a careful inter-
`pretation of the respective Kd values.
`Previously, we identified GLP-l-(7-36)-amide receptors on
`rat lung membranes. Our data now show that exendin-4 and
`GLP-l-(7-36)-amide, similar to the results of the experiments
`with RINm5F cells, compete for the same binding site on lung
`membranes and that exendin-4 binds with higher affinity.
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`
`
`T
`
`T
`
`21
`0 c
`
`100
`
`~
`
`~~
`
`-
`EX-4
`Ex-4
`GLP-1
`GLP-1
`+
`+
`+
`-
`-
`Ex-(8-38)
`FIG. 6. Upper panel, induction of proinsulin gene promotor-driven
`chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity by exendin-4 (hatched
`bars on the left) and GLP-l-(7-36)-amide (crossed burs on the right).
`Whereas exendin-4 exerted a significant stimulation ( p < 0.05) over
`the whole range of tested concentrations, the GLP-1-induced effect
`was not significant at 1 nM. Lower panel, truncated exendin-(9-39)-
`amide (1 pM) reduced the GLP-1-induced (10 nM) or exendin-4-
`induced (10 nM) increase of the promotor activity. Given are means
`k S.E. of four experiments.
`
`were transiently transfected with a plasmid containing 410
`base pairs of the rat insulin I gene promotor fused to the
`transcriptional reporter gene encoding the bacterial enzyme
`chloramphenicol acetyltransferase. After transfection, cells
`were repeatedly treated for 6,10, and 24 h, and both peptides,
`GLP-1-(7-36)-amide and exendin-4, induced chlorampheni-
`col acetyltransferase activities in a dose-dependent manner
`(Fig. 6, upper panel). Tested in the same concentration range,
`exendin-4 grossly appeared to be equipotent to GLP-1. The
`stimulatory effect of both peptides on proinsulin promotor
`activity was maximal at 10 nM. The lower panel shows that
`the additional introduction
`of truncated exendin-(9-39)-
`amide (1 PM) in combination with GLP-1 or exendin-4 inhib-
`ited but not fully abolished both the GLP-1-induced (10 nM)
`and exendin-4-induced (10 nM) increase of the proinsulin
`promotor activity. It seems that the repeated and prolonged
`(24 h) administration of truncated exendin-(9-39)-amide ex-
`hibited some partial agonistic activity against proinsulin pro-
`motor activation.
`
`SANOFI-AVENTIS Exhibit 1018 - Page 19654
`
`IPR for Patent No. 8,951,962
`
`

`
`Exendins on GLP-1 Receptor of Islet P-Cells
`19655
`3. Goke, R., Fehmann, H. C., and Goke, B. (1991) Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 2 1 ,
`Vasoactive intestinal peptide and peptide histidine isoleucine
`135-144
`are able to displace 1251-GLP-1-(7-36)-amide from its binding
`4. Fehmann, H. C., Goke, R., and Goke, B. (1992) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 8 5 ,
`c39-c44
`sites to rat lung membranes (8) but do not compete with "'1-
`5. Fehmann, H. C., and Habener, J. F. (1992) Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 3 ,
`exendin-4 for binding to lung membranes. This may be a
`158-163
`6. Goke, R., and Conlon, J. M. (1988) J. Endocrid 116,357-362
`further reflection of the high affinity binding of exendin-4 to
`7. Goke, R., Cole, T., and Conlon, J. M. (1989) J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2 , 93-98
`8. Goke, R., Oltmer, B., Shelk, S. P., and Goke, B. (1992) FEBS Lett. 3 0 0 ,
`GLP-1-(7-36)-amide receptors in this tissue.
`232-236
`Our data now raise the possibility of defining the exact
`9. Thorens, B. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89,8641-8645
`10. Fehmann, H. C., Goke, R., Goke, B., Eissele, R., and Arnold, R. (1991) Int.
`physiologic role for GLP-1 utilizing a specific GLP-l-antag-
`J. Pancreatol. 8,289-303
`onistic compound (exendin-(9-39)-amide). It now seems fea-
`11. Parker, D. S., Raufman, J. P., ODonohue, T. L., Bledsoe, M., Yoshida, H.,
`and Pisano, J. J. (1984) J. Bml. Chem. 259,11751-11755
`sible to quantify GLP-1's contribution to the incretin effect.
`12. Vandermeers, A., Vandermeers-Plret, M. C., Robberecht, P., Waelbrock,
`M., Dehaye, J. P., Winand, J., and Christophe, J. (1984) FEBS Lett.
`Recent clinical studies have focused mainly on a possible
`1 an 3 7 7 - 3 7 ~
`"V) 1 I " 1 I"
`therapeutic significance of GLP-1 in the treatment of non-
`13. Eng, J., Andrews, P. C., Kleinman, W. A., Singh, L., and Raufman, J.-P.
`(1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265,20259-20262
`insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (type I1 diabetes) (30,
`14. En , J , Kleinman, W. A., Singh, L., Singh, G., and Raufman, J.-P. (1992)
`31). So, future studies need to investigate whether exendin-4
`Bwl. Chem. 267,7402-7405
`15. Raufman, J.-P., Singh, L., and Eng, J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 2 6 6 , 2897-
`could be an even more potent insulin-releasing therapeutic
`van')
`16. Raufman, J.-P., Singh, L., Singh, G., and Eng, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem.
`alternative in diabetes therapy. The latter idea is supported
`267,21432-21437
`18. W a h i m , C. B.,'and Pozzan, f. i19&) J. h o l . Chem. 259,2262-2267
`by a preliminary report, that exendin-4 evoked a greater
`17. En J and Eng C. (1992) Re ul Pe t. 40 142 (abstr.)
`insulin secretory response than GLP-1 when infused in dogs
`19. Richter, G., Goke, R., Goke, B., and Arnold, R. (1990) FEBS Lett. 2 6 7 ,
`7 ~ a n
`(17).
`20. RilEc; G., Goke, R., Goke, B., Schmidt, H., and Arnold, R. (1991) FEBS
`Taken together, our study shows that exendin-4 is a super
`Lett. 280,247-250
`Goke, R., Kolligs, F.? Richter, G., Lankat-Buttgereit, B., and Goke, B.
`21.
`agonist and exendin-(9-39)-amide a potent antagonist at the
`(1993) Am. J. Phys~oL 2 6 4 , L146-Ll52
`Richter, G., Feddersen, 0.. Wagner, U., Barth, P., Goke, R., Goke, B. (1993)
`GLP-1-(7-36)-amide receptor on RINm5F cells and rat lung
`22.
`Praz, G. A., &alb&, 8. A,,, Wollheim, C. B., Blondel, B., Strauss, A. J., and
`Am. J. Ph swl in ress
`membranes. Both peptides are useful tools to further inves-
`23.
`tigate the physiological role of GLP-l-(7-36)-amide. Further-
`Renold A. E. (1983) Bmchem. J. 210,345-352
`24.
`(1976) A d . Bwchem. 72,248-254
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket