throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-1518-GMS
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`))))))))))))
`
`ADVANCED MEDIA NETWORKS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`T-MOBILE US, INC.; AND
`T-MOBILE USA, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`PLAINTIFF ADVANCED MEDIA NETWORKS, LLC’S
`IDENTIFICATION OF ACCUSED PRODUCTS AND ASSERTED CLAIMS
`
`Pursuant to Paragraph 4(a) of the Court’s Default Standard for Discovery, Plaintiff
`
`Advanced Media Networks, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Advanced Media”) hereby provides its
`
`identification of the accused products and asserted claims. Advanced Media makes these
`
`disclosures based on its current understanding of the issues in this case and based on information
`
`reasonably available to Advanced Media at this time. Advanced Media’s investigation is
`
`continuing, and it expressly reserves the right to amend or modify these Disclosures based on
`
`additional information obtained through continued discovery or other means.
`
`I.
`
`Identity of the Accused Products
`
`T-MOBILE
`
`T-Mobile is engaged in the business of selling digital wireless services to subscribers. T-
`
`Mobile operates a vast wireless telecommunications network over which subscribers are able to
`
`communicate voice data as well as other data using broadband services. T-Mobile’s network
`
`consists of a large multitude of cells that communicate with mobile devices via microwaves. The
`
`cells typically provide redundant overlapping coverage for a given area such that a subscribers
`
`Page 1
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1037 - Page 1
`
`

`
`moving with a T-Mobile device from one area to the next may seamlessly be handed-off from
`
`one cell to the next without dropping service. The T-Mobile system (the “Accused System”)
`
`constitutes a “redundant microwave communication system” as this phrase is used in the claims
`
`of the ’074 Patent.
`
`A subscriber to T-Mobile’s services over the Accused System typically buys or leases a
`
`digital communications device such as a smart phone, tablet computer (“tablet”), router,
`
`gateway, or other mobile device containing a WLAN network access point (i.e. “HotSpot”).
`
`Examples of smart phones currently or previously imported, offered for sale, and/or sold
`
`by T-Mobile are the Alcatel One Touch Evolve 2, Alcatel One Touch Fierce 2, Apple iPhone 5c,
`
`Apple iPhone 5s, Apple iPhone 6, Apple iPhone 6 Plus, LG G3, LG F3Q, LG Optimus L90,
`
`Nokia Lumia 635, Samsung Galaxy Avant, Samsung Galaxy Note 3, Samsung Galaxy Note 4,
`
`Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 10.1 2014, Samsung Galaxy S 4, Samsung Galaxy S 5, and all past,
`
`present and future cellular phones that offer connectivity to other devices to the T-Mobile
`
`network over a local area network provided by the device (these and all similar cellular phones
`
`referred to herein as the “Accused Phones”). Each of these Accused Phones may be configured
`
`to constitute a “mobile hub station configured to transfer information as a single nomadic
`
`transmission/reception point between the microwave communication system”, i.e., the T-Mobile
`
`telecommunications system, and a “wireless LAN [local area network] using an Ethernet packet
`
`switching protocol,” “the TCP/IP protocol,” and/or “an Internet protocol” (as these terms are
`
`used in the claims, e.g., Claims 1, 3, and 128, of the ’074 Patent). Whether or not a subscriber
`
`may utilize the mobile hotspot or tethering feature of an Accused Phone is controlled by T-
`
`Mobile.
`
`Page 2
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1037 - Page 2
`
`

`
`In addition to the Accused Phones, T-Mobile also imports, offers for sale and/or sells, or
`
`has previously imported, offered for sale, and/or sold, the following tablet devices that have the
`
`capability to connect to the T-Mobile broadband wireless network as well as providing a local
`
`area network (LAN) over which other devices may connect to the T-Mobile wireless network:
`
`Apple iPad Air, Apple iPad Mini with Retina display, Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 8.0 and all past,
`
`present and future tablets that offer connectivity to other devices to the T-Mobile network over a
`
`local area network provided by the device (these and all similar mobile tablets referred to herein
`
`as the “Accused Tablets”). Each of these Accused Tablets may be configured to constitute a
`
`“mobile hub station configured to transfer information as a single nomadic
`
`transmission/reception point between the microwave communication system”, i.e., the T-Mobile
`
`telecommunications system, and a “wireless LAN [local area network] using an Ethernet packet
`
`switching protocol,” “the TCP/IP protocol,” and/or “an Internet protocol” (as terms are used in
`
`the claims, e.g. Claims 1, 3, and 128, of the ’074 Patent).
`
`In addition to the Accused Phones and Accused Tablets, T-Mobile also imports, offers
`
`for sale, and/or sells, or has previously imported, offered for sale, and/or sold, the base stations,
`
`including but not limited to the Samsung LTE Mobile HotSpot PRO (See Exhibit 10 of the
`
`Complaint), each of which connects to the T-Mobile wireless network and provides a mobile
`
`local area network (LAN) through which other devices may connect to the T-Mobile network.
`
`All past, present and future mobile stations that offer connectivity to other devices to the T-
`
`Mobile network over a local area network provided by the device are referred to herein as the
`
`“Accused Mobile Access Points.” The Accused Phones, Accused Tablets, and Accused Mobile
`
`Access Points are collectively referred to herein as the “Accused Devices.” Each of these
`
`Accused Mobile Access Points may be configured to constitute a “mobile hub station configured
`
`Page 3
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1037 - Page 3
`
`

`
`to transfer information as a single nomadic transmission/reception point between the microwave
`
`communication system”, i.e., the T-Mobile telecommunications system, and a “wireless LAN
`
`[local area network] using an Ethernet packet switching protocol,” “the TCP/IP protocol,” and/or
`
`“an Internet protocol” (as these terms are used in the claims, e.g., Claims 1, 3, and 128, of the
`
`’074 Patent).
`
`A subscriber who purchases one of the Accused Devices must subscribe to a T-Mobile
`
`data plan to use the device to connect to the Internet over T-Mobile’s wireless network. In order
`
`for an Accused Device to be connected to T-Mobile’s wireless system, the device must have a
`
`SIM card provided by T-Mobile that contains information that is associated with a subscriber’s
`
`account and which enables the Accused Device to be used on T-Mobile’s wireless network. In
`
`fact, a SIM card can be purchased by or reprogrammed for a subscriber to enable a device not
`
`purchased through T-Mobile to be used on T-Mobile’s wireless network (any such phone, tablet
`
`or other device utilizing a T-Mobile SIM card and providing a LAN for tethering or otherwise
`
`connecting other devices, is also included within the definition of “Accused Devices”). The SIM
`
`card is the key by which T-Mobile controls which devices may connect to the T-Mobile wireless
`
`network. Without T-Mobile’s SIM card, the Accused Device is useless for its intended purpose
`
`of facilitating wireless communications over a wireless network, although certain features such
`
`as a calculator or camera application may still be used. The code, data and/or other information
`
`stored on the SIM card facilitate T-Mobile’s control over which devices may be connected to the
`
`T-Mobile wireless communications network. The SIM card identifies the subscriber to the T-
`
`Mobile’s network and facilitates T-Mobile in billing the user for services that the subscriber
`
`uses. In addition, in the event the subscriber’s service or subscription is terminated, T-Mobile
`
`Page 4
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1037 - Page 4
`
`

`
`may de-active the device via the use of the code, data and/or other information stored on the SIM
`
`card so that the device cannot connect to the T-Mobile telecommunications network.
`
`At least as to the Accused Phones and the Accused Tablets, the data plan typically,
`
`without additional fees, only allows the device itself to connect to the T-Mobile wireless
`
`network. In order to connect other devices through the LAN provided by one of the Accused
`
`Phones or the Accused Tablets, historically, a subscriber has paid an additional fee or subscribed
`
`to a more expensive and a higher capacity data plan for the ability to “tether” additional devices
`
`through the Accused Phone or Accused Tablet over the LAN provided by same. More recently,
`
`“tethering” appears to be included in some T-Mobile data plans, such as “Unlimited tablet or
`
`Hotspot data plans,” which also refer to “tethering” as a “mobile hotspot.” Even when an
`
`additional fee is not charged by T-Mobile for tethering and/or mobile hotspot service, the use of
`
`tethering and/or mobile hotspot service results in a higher amount of data downloaded by a
`
`subscriber which, in turn, results in higher fees to T-Mobile. Telecommunications services
`
`offered for sale and sold by T-Mobile in connection with the Accused Devices, including but not
`
`limited to the “Tethering” services, the “mobile hotspot” service, and the services sold in
`
`connection with data plans associated with the Accused Mobile Access Points, are referred to
`
`herein as the “Accused Services.”
`
`The T-Mobile Accused System and the Accused Devices are collectively referred to
`
`herein as the “Accused Instrumentalities.” The Accused Instrumentalities and Accused Services
`
`are collectively referred to herein as the “Accused Instrumentalities and Services.”
`
`Advanced Media names these specific Accused Instrumentalities and Services and
`
`components thereof by way of example, and not as a limitation. Discovery is in its infancy in this
`
`case, and Advanced Media reserves the right to name additional Accused Instrumentalities
`
`Page 5
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1037 - Page 5
`
`

`
`and/or components thereof in the event that, through discovery, Advanced Media learns of other
`
`Defendant services, systems, products, or instrumentalities that embody the inventions of the
`
`Asserted Patents.
`
`METRO PCS
`
`MetroPCS is engaged in the business of selling digital wireless services to subscribers.
`
`MetroPCS offers service on the T-Mobile Network. Using T-Mobile’s Network, MetroPCS
`
`offers a vast wireless telecommunications network over which subscribers are able to
`
`communicate voice data as well as other data using broadband services. MetroPCS’s Network
`
`consists of a large multitude of cells that communicate with mobile devices via microwaves. The
`
`cells typically provide redundant overlapping coverage for a given area such that a subscriber
`
`moving with a MetroPCS device from one area to the next may seamlessly be handed-off from
`
`one cell to the next without dropping service. As a result, the MTSO constantly monitors signal
`
`strength of both the caller and the receiver. When signal strength begins to fade, the MTSO
`
`locates the next best cell site and re-routes the conversation to maintain the communications link.
`
`The switch from one cell site to another takes about 300 milliseconds and is not noticeable to the
`
`user. The cells overlap one another and operate at different transmitting and receiving
`
`frequencies in order to eliminate cross-talk when transmitting from cell to cell.”). Hence, the
`
`system used by MetroPCS (the “MetroPCS Accused System”) constitutes a “redundant
`
`microwave communication system” as this phrase is used in claims of the `074 Patent.
`
`A subscriber to MetroPCS’s services over the MetroPCS Accused System typically buys
`
`or leases a digital communications device such as a smart phone, tablet, router, gateway, or other
`
`mobile device containing a WLAN network access point (i.e. “HotSpot”).
`
`Page 6
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1037 - Page 6
`
`

`
`Examples of smart phones currently imported, offered for sale, and/or sold by or
`
`previously imported, offered for sale, and/or sold by MetroPCS are the Alcatel One Touch
`
`Evolve, Kyocera Hydro Life, LG Optimus F6, LG Optimus L70, Samsung Galaxy Mega,
`
`Samsung Galaxy S 4, Samsung Galaxy S 5, ZTE Concord II, and all past, present and future
`
`cellular phones that offer connectivity to other devices to the MetroPCS network over a local
`
`area network provided by the device (these and all similar cellular phones referred to herein as
`
`the “Accused Phones”). Each of these Accused Phones may be configured to constitute a
`
`“mobile hub station configured to transfer information as a single nomadic
`
`transmission/reception point between the microwave communication system”, i.e., the
`
`telecommunications system used by MetroPCS, and a “wireless LAN [local area network] using
`
`an Ethernet packet switching protocol,” “the TCP/IP protocol,” and/or “an Internet protocol” (as
`
`terms are used in the claims, e.g., Claims 1, 3, and 128, of the `074 Patent). Whether or not a
`
`subscriber may utilize the mobile hotspot or tethering feature of an Accused Phone is controlled
`
`by MetroPCS.
`
`A subscriber who purchases one of the Accused Devices must subscribe to a MetroPCS
`
`data plan to use the device to connect to the internet over a wireless network used by MetroPCS.
`
`In order for an Accused Device to be connected to the wireless system used by MetroPCS, the
`
`device must have a SIM card provided by MetroPCS that contains information that is associated
`
`with a subscriber’s account and which enables the Accused Device to be used on the wireless
`
`network used by MetroPCS. Each Accused Device is enabled or activated by MetroPCS through
`
`information stored on a SIM card. In fact, a SIM card can be purchased by or reprogrammed for
`
`a subscriber to enable a device not purchased through MetroPCS to be used on the wireless
`
`network used by MetroPCS (any such phone, tablet or other device utilizing a MetroPCS SIM
`
`Page 7
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1037 - Page 7
`
`

`
`card and providing a LAN for tethering or otherwise connecting other devices, is also included
`
`within the definition of “Accused Devices”). The SIM card is the key by which MetroPCS
`
`controls which devices may connect to the wireless network used by MetroPCS. Without
`
`MetroPCS’s SIM card, the Accused Device is useless for its intended purpose of facilitating
`
`wireless communications over a wireless network, although certain features such as calculator or
`
`camera functionality may still be used. The code, data and/or other information stored on the
`
`SIM card allows MetroPCS to maintain control over which devices may be connected to the
`
`wireless communications network used by MetroPCS. The SIM card identifies the subscriber to
`
`MetroPCS’s network and facilitates MetroPCS in billing the user for the services that the
`
`subscriber uses. In addition, in the event the subscriber’s service or subscription is terminated,
`
`MetroPCS may de-activate the device via the use of the code, data and/or other information
`
`stored on the SIM card so that the device cannot connect to the telecommunications network
`
`used by MetroPCS.
`
`At least as to the Accused Phones and the Accused Tablets, the data plan typically,
`
`without additional fees, only allows the device itself to connect to the wireless network used by
`
`MetroPCS. In order to connect other devices through the LAN provided by one of the Accused
`
`Phones or the Accused Tablets, historically, a subscriber has paid an additional fee or subscribed
`
`to a more expensive and a higher capacity data plan for the ability to “tether” additional devices
`
`through the Accused Phone or Accused Tablet over the LAN provided by same. More recently,
`
`MetroPCS has charged $5 per month for mobile hotspot access if a customer is on a $40, $50 or
`
`$60 plan. Even when an additional fee is not charged by MetroPCS for tethering and/or mobile
`
`hotspot service, the use of tethering and/or mobile hotspot service results in a higher amount of
`
`data downloaded by a subscriber which, in turn, results in higher fees to MetroPCS.
`
`Page 8
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1037 - Page 8
`
`

`
`Telecommunications services offered for sale and sold by MetroPCS in connection with
`
`the Accused Devices, including but not limited to the “Tethering” services and the “mobile
`
`hotspot” service are referred to herein as the “Accused Services.” The MetroPCS Accused
`
`System and the Accused Devices are collectively referred to herein as the “Accused
`
`Instrumentalities.” The Accused Instrumentalities and the Accused Services are collectively
`
`referred to herein as the “Accused Instrumentalities and Services.”
`
`Advanced Media names these specific Accused Instrumentalities and Services and
`
`components thereof by way of example, and not as a limitation. Discovery is in its infancy in this
`
`case, and Advanced Media reserves the right to name additional Accused Instrumentalities
`
`and/or components thereof in the event that, through discovery, Advanced Media learns of other
`
`Defendant services, systems, products, or instrumentalities that embody the inventions of the
`
`Asserted Patents.
`
`II.
`
`Asserted Patents and Claims
`
`Advanced Media contends that Defendants infringe United States Patent No. 5,960,074,
`
`entitled “Mobile Tele-Computer Network for Motion Picture, Television and TV Advertising
`
`Production,” including but not limited to the following claims: 1-3, 5-11, 13-14, 16-21, 23, 28-
`
`31, 33-37, 41-47, 49-54, 56, 58, 60, 62-67, 69-71, 73, 75, 91, 93-97, 99-101, 103, 105, 123-124,
`
`126, 128-129, 130-141, 143-144, and 146.
`
`Concurrently herewith, Advanced Media is producing the Asserted Patent and file
`
`histories of the Asserted Patent, Bates Nos. AMN000001 – AMN000126. The production may
`
`be downloaded via the following link: https://bjciplaw.sharefile.com/d-s1b54da3f43b4cb6b (The
`
`documents must be downloaded within 30 days).
`
`Page 9
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1037 - Page 9
`
`

`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
`
`/S/GREGORY B. WILLIAMS
`Gregory B. Williams (I.D. #4195)
`Citizens Bank Center
`919 N. Market Street
`Suite 300
`Wilmington, DE 19899-2323
`(302) 622-4211
`(302) 656-8920 – Fax
`gwilliams@foxrothschild.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Advanced Media Networks, LLC
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`BUETHER JOE & CARPENTER, LLC
`Brian A. Carpenter
`Eric W. Buether
`Christopher M. Joe
`Mark D. Perantie
`Niknaz Bukovcan
`1700 Pacific Avenue
`Suite 4750
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`(214) 446-1273
`(214) 635-1829 - Fax
`Brian.Carpenter@BJCIPlaw.com
`Eric.Buether@BJCIPlaw.com
`Chris.Joe@BJCIPlaw.com
`Mark.Perantie@BJCIPLaw.com
`Niky.Bukovcan@BJCIPlaw.com
`
`Dated: May 27, 2015
`
`Page 10
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1037 - Page 10
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that copies of Plaintiff Advanced Media Networks,
`
`LLC’s Identification of Accused Products and Asserted Claims were served via Email upon the
`
`following counsel of record on this 27th day of May, 2015:
`
`Anne Shea Gaza, Esquire
`Samantha G. Wilson, Esquire
`YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP
`100 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`agaza@ycst.com
`swilson@ycst.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc.
`and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
`
`FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP
`
`/s/ Gregory B. Williams
`Gregory B. Williams (I.D. No. 4195)
`
`Page 11
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1037 - Page 11

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket