throbber
llllll|||l|l||llllllllllllll?tlllillggllulllllllllllllllllllllllllll
`
`Unlted States Patent [19]
`Polivka et al.
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] Date of Patent:
`
`5,463,656
`Oct. 31, 1995
`
`[54] SYSTEM FOR CONDUCTING VIDEO
`COMMUNICATIONS OVER SATELLITE
`COMMUNICATION LINK WITH AIRCRAFT
`HAVING PHYSICALLY COMPACT,
`EFFECTIVELY CONFORMAL, PHASED
`ARRAY ANTENNA
`
`[75] Inventors; Alan L, Polivka, Palm Bay; Charles
`Zahm, India-antic, both of F1a_
`
`[73] Assignee: Harris Corporation, Melbourne, Fla.
`
`[21] APPL Nu; 146,289
`
`oct- 29, 1993
`[22] Filed:
`[51] Int. Cl.6 ............................ .. H04N 7/167- H04B 1/69
`[52] Us. CL
`3751200 376/18 380/10
`_
`_
`380/13’ 380/19_’ 380/29
`f S
`,
`[58] Field 0 earch ................................. .. 375/1, 370/18,
`380/10’ 13’ 19’ 20
`
`[56]
`
`.
`References Clted
`U_S_ PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`4’743’906 5/1988 Fullerton ' ' ' ' ' ‘ ' '
`4,901,307 2/1990 Gilhousen et a1.
`5,127,021
`6/1992 Schreiber . . . . . .
`
`' ' ' ' " 375”
`375/1
`. . . . .. 375/1
`
`5,230,076
`
`7/1993 Wilkinson . . . . .
`
`. . . . .. 375/1
`
`.... .. 375/1
`5,285,470 2/1994 Schreiber et a1. .
`5,313,457 5/1994 Hostetter et al. ......................... .. 375/1
`
`Primary Examiner—-David C. Cain
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Charles Wands
`
`[57]
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A system architecture and communication methodology for
`signi?cantly reducing the size of an aircraft antenna required
`to provide full broadcast quality video communications with
`an aircraft via a satellite communications link includes a
`combination of video bandwidth compression, spread spec~
`trum waveform processing and an electronically steered,
`circular aperture phased array antenna, that is conformal
`with an airframe surface of the aircraft. The combination
`provides su?icient signal power to the aircraft, enables
`interference from other satellites to be rejected and main
`‘aims th" Power Spectral density 0f the satellite’s Video
`transmission within FCC requirements. The polarization of
`the receive array is aligned with that of the incoming beam
`from the relay satellite by means of an error signal feed back
`path to control the steering waights Ofthe may Because the
`phased arrays are conformal, it is necessary to modify the
`phase shift settings produced by the antenna steering mecha
`nism executed by the degree of departure of the conformal
`geometry of the array from a planar con?guration. A coor
`dinate transformation look-up table is coupled in the control
`feedback path from the antenna steering mechanism and the
`
`phase shift elements of the phased may‘
`
`29 Claims, 7 Drawing Sheets
`
`COMPRESSED vmto
`OR OTHER DATA
`(FROM IELECONFERENCE
`SHE 14)
`|—"——1
`
`‘
`
`204-N
`l TRANSMITTER
`1
`STAGE
`
`f; FORWARD ERROR
`‘ CORRECTION UNIT
`
`|
`
`l
`
`PSK/SPREAD
`SPECTRUM
`MODULATION UNIT
`
`l
`l
`
`|
`
`I
`1
`.
`;
`i
`l
`l
`|
`l
`l
`l
`l
`l
`l
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1028 - Page 1
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1028 - Page 2
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 31, 1995
`
`Sheet 2 0f 7
`
`5,463,656
`
`mg%m
`C—BAND
`
`H
`//w/
`
`W
`%f‘
`TVRO
`RCVR
`
`//~203
`VmEO
`> COMPRESSION
`UNH 0R CATV
`________________________ __
`
`T
`l
`{
`:
`msl
`SEAREE
`:
`FREQ.
`I
`SOURCE
`{
`!
`W K214 1
`mm.
`1
`smmgmm
`,
`r
`‘, /m7i 1
`1
`1
`=»uR-c0NvEREER
`E
`;
`1
`‘RF/N9I :
`wmmE
`i1
`ATTENUATOR
`1
`i
`:
`l
`\
`I
`i
`i
`
`COMPRESSED vmEo
`OR OTHER DATA
`(FROM TELECONFERENCE
`SE16
`F“——‘1
`‘,,/204-N
`TRANSMHTER
`STAGE
`
`1
`i
`|
`;
`I
`l
`l
`
`}
`L;;»/I
`
`J
`
`mREExER
`
`1
`
`\_
`
`202
`
`206
`
`E
`
`MUX
`
`"
`207“
`FORWARD ERRoR
`CORRECTlON UNIT
`
`2M1 v
`PSK/SPREAD
`SPECTRUM
`‘MODULAHON UNH
`__—_—___
`
`IF
`
`F
`l
`!
`: 205—'/
`1
`i
`l
`‘I
`l

`:
`I
`1
`{
`E
`:
`1
`i
`:
`i
`i
`l
`
`1
`
`,/210
`CONTROL
`PROCESSOR
`
`\
`
`1
`
`E___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ J
`
`TRANSMH STAGE
`
`T\204-1
`
`FTC. 2A
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1028 - Page 3
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 31, 1995
`
`Sheet 3 of 7
`
`5,463,656
`
`3 a
`
`E ‘T N \ W| Dn A a
`R f RRTI mmln m VA A ED VMSFL
`
`
`7Q 7Q ROSDT 2 70 M R P .LT.
` L L OV Err. D Y W Pm We ER N D "EA VSEH
`
`2 ES ETIU
`
`OT CTT SHCH
`
`2 N m .
`
`_Dn
`
`_TVTG _ rum _ K5
`_L|__L|_
`
`_ 2 2
`
`2 C
`
`70 O0 T.
`
`_T T 1 I I T I T I T i l T T T T l I ||T_
`
`
`_V E VESU "DEE
`Ell * WR AKM UR Tl IDT
`
`0V RDTD DnDnD _ DN D! O ARO E m wrsL m Twwc
`w 2 G D.\. O H _ mi N m Mww
`
`
`_ 00 D D 1| 0 D
`70 A. F
`
`.7
`
`E < 6 _ 7d
`
`v? EL
`2 ‘a
`
`(ma
`
`70 VI 1 ARUZ
`4 FM T mmR?
`
`S S
`
`1 00
`R P
`CD“
`
`T|_|.F._1|' NCZ
`
`T_OS
`RS0
`
`LO
`
`Dn
`
`0
`
`R
`
`R [L
`
`CONTROL PROCESSOR 210
`
`SOURCE/SINK OF DATA
`)
`7 (E6. TELECONFERENCE SITE
`
`\
`14
`
`L_—‘L______!
`COMPRESSED VIDEO (OR OTHER DATA)
`(To TRANSMITTER STAGE 204)
`
`FIG. 2B
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1028 - Page 4
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 31, 1995
`
`Sheet 4 of 7
`
`5,463,656
`
`2/1}. MONOPULSE COMPARATOR
`
`FIG. 3.4
`
`f 420
`POLARIZATION
`RECEIVER
`(FIG 6)
`
`II
`RECEIVER /230*K
`STAGE
`—\
`(COMPRESSED VIDEO
`FOR TELECONF. OR
`OTHER DATA,
`TELEPHONY ETC.)
`
`II
`
`/27O
`CONTROL _
`PROCESSOR
`
`II
`FREQ.
`SYNTHESIZER
`
`'
`
`V
`
`DESPREADING :
`DEMODULATOR
`
`STABLE
`FREQ. SOURCE
`
`TRANSMITTER
`
`1sTACTs
`
`FIG. 3B
`II
`
`'
`
`COMPRESSION/
`RECONSTRUCTION
`UNIT
`
`II
`
`FORWARD ERROR
`CORRECTION
`DECODER UNIT
`
`MUX
`
`VIDEO
`ON BOARD
`—% VIDEO
`RECONSTRUCTION
`UNIT
`MONITOR(S)
`(OECONRRTssIONI
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1028 - Page 5
`
`

`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1028 - Page 6
`
`

`
`US. Patent
`
`Oct. 31, 1995
`
`Sheet 6 of 7
`
`5,463,656
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1028 - Page 7
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Oct. 31, 1995
`
`Sheet 7 of 7
`
`5,463,656
`
`1
`POLARIZATION
`I
`RECEIVER
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`I
`
`COORDINATE
`
`4
`
`*- TRANSTORMATION ‘
`
`II
`
`r431
`LPF
`
`ELEMENT LOCATION
`& ORIENTATION
`
`I
`I
`I
`
`FIG.
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1028 - Page 8
`
`

`
`5,463,656
`
`1
`SYSTEM FOR CONDUCTING VIDEO
`COMMUNICATIONS OVER SATELLITE
`COMlVIUNICATION LINK WITH AIRCRAFT
`HAVING PHYSICALLY COMPACT,
`EFFECTIVELY CONFORMAL, PHASED
`ARRAY ANTENNA
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates in general to communication
`systems and is particularly directed to system architecture
`and communication methodology that signi?cantly reduces
`the size of the aircraft antenna required to provide full
`broadcast quality video to (or from) an aircraft via a satellite
`communications link.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`aperture.
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`In accordance with the present, the size of the antenna can
`be signi?cantly reduced, thereby greatly increasing the prac
`ticality of conducting satellite-linked broadcast quality
`video communications with an aircraft, by means of a
`combination of video bandwidth compression, spread spec
`trum waveform processing, forward error correction coding
`and circular aperture phased array antenna technology. By
`combining the signal processing methodologies with a
`phased array antenna, there is realized a communication
`which ensures that sui?cient signal power can be received at
`the aircraft, interference from other satellites can be rejected
`and the power spectral density of the satellite’s video
`transmission can be kept within FCC requirements while, at
`the same time, using a signi?cantly smaller aircraft antenna
`aperture than would otherwise be possible.
`In accordance with the communication mechanism
`employed by the present invention, video signals to be
`transmitted to the aircraft, which can originate on the ground
`from any of a number of potential sources, such as a
`TV-receive only satellite receiver, cable, etc. are initially
`digitized and compressed. The compression operation
`reduces the data rate of the digitized video (which, for
`example, may be on the order of 100 Mb/s) by nearly two
`orders of magnitude (with present day technology), while
`maintaining the full motion and resolution associated with
`broadcast quality video. The video compression reduces the
`information bandwidth which, in turn, reduces the receive
`aperture size required to maintain a given bit error rate
`(assuming all other factors remain the same). The com—
`pressed information bandwidth also improves spread spec
`trum processing gain.
`The digitized compressed video signal can be encoded for
`forward error correction and then spread spectrum-modu
`lated onto a carrier. The use of error correction coding in
`conjunction with eiiicient (e.g. coherent PSK-type or MSK)
`data modulation further reduces the aperture size for a given
`bit error rate.
`The power spectral density of the modulated signal is
`reduced via the spread spectrum processing. Spread spec
`trum processing provides several bene?ts: reduced power
`spectral density (for FCC compliance), privacy (to prevent
`unauthorized users from demodulating the video signal) and
`it enables the receiver on the aircraft to reject interfering
`transmissions from other satellites. Spread spectrum pro
`cessing can take the form of direct PN sequence modulation
`and/or frequency hopping, for example.
`The spread signal is then transmitted from the ground to
`a relay satellite. The relay satellite retransmits the spread
`signal through a transmission zone (e.g. continental US.
`conical coverage) within which the aircraft is travelling. The
`aircraft receives the satellite’s transmission via a compact
`phased array antenna which is preferably conformally con
`?gured so that it may be mounted on the fuselage of the
`aircraft. The phased array antenna provides the required
`amount of antenna gain, while occupying less volume than
`would a purely mechanically steered antenna. The phased
`array antenna may be totally electronically scanned or it may
`only be partially electronically scanned. An example of a
`phased array which is only partially electronically scanned
`is one which scans electronically in one dimension (e.g.
`elevation) and mechanically (e.g. rotational) in the other.
`The face (aperture) of such an antenna may be parallel to the
`
`Conventional schemes for conducting video communica
`tions by way of a satellite link use analog modulation
`formats, which require a very large information bandwidth
`in order to achieve the full motion and resolution that is
`characteristic of ‘broadcast quality’ video. Due to intema
`tional restrictions and FCC regulations placed upon satellite
`transmission power spectral density, it is necessary to use a
`physically large receive antenna with these traditional wide
`band analog modulation formats, in order to achieve the high
`signal-to-noise ratio associated with broadcast quality video.
`Another factor that mandates the use of a physically large
`video receive antenna is the need to reject (interfering)
`transmissions from other satellites which are near the sat~
`ellite sourcing the video. Because commercial satellites can
`be spaced as closely as 2° (in longitude) from one another,
`the antennas utilized in the receive link from these satellites
`are typically designed to have a null-to-null beamwidth of
`less than 4° (+/—2°). Such a narrow beamwidth requires a
`considerably large antenna aperture at the allocated com—
`mercial satellite operating frequencies.
`Unfortunately, the need to install a large geometry
`antenna on the aircraft is one of the greatest obstacles
`incurred to date in attempting to receive broadcast quality
`video from satellites. This has generally rendered the
`antenna, and therefore the communication system, to be
`impractical, because of size, cost, power and/or weight
`constraints associated with the aircraft. Indeed, the use of a
`purely mechanically steered aircraft antenna for this appli
`cation is generally precluded, since most aircraft have lim
`ited space on board and the fact that a mechanically steered
`antenna requires a volume larger than that of the antenna
`itself, in order to accommodate steering over the range of
`pointing angles required to maintain communications during
`normal aircraft flight maneuvers.
`To signi?cantly reduce the volume required and to allow
`placement of the antenna on or near the aircraft’s skin, an
`electronically steered (phased array) antenna (or one that is
`at least partially electronically steered) is preferred. Elec
`tronic scanning, however, affects the antenna aperture area
`required, since the gain of a phased array antenna con?gu
`ration decreases (the bearnwidth widens) as the antenna is
`electronically scanned off-boresight. For example, at a scan
`angle of 60°, the gain may drop by approximately 5 dB from
`what is achievable at boresight. This reduction in gain must
`generally be compensated by an increase in antenna aperture
`area (e.g. by a factor of more than three to recoup the ?ve
`dB loss). Hence, although the phased array antenna occupies
`a much smaller volume than a mechanically steered antenna,
`there is still a strong incentive to reduce the required antenna
`
`20
`
`25
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1028 - Page 9
`
`

`
`5,463,656
`
`3
`plane of rotation or may be tilted. This architecture still
`provides signi?cant volume reduction as compared with a
`purely mechanically scanned antenna.
`In a preferred embodiment where the antenna can be
`mounted conformal with the aircraft surface, the antenna is
`mounted on the top of the fuselage as two phased arrays, one
`on the port side and one on the starboard side of the aircraft,
`so as to provide maximal spatial coverage with the satellite
`regardless of the attitude of the aircraft. A single antenna
`could be used in place of the port-starboard pair in situations
`where a more restricted beam scanning volume is accept
`able. Conformal mounting provides additional bene?ts, such
`as minimal visibility of the antenna, n0 consumption of
`cabin space, minimal aerodynamic drag, etc. The antenna
`aperture is approximately circular so as to reduce the
`antenna sidelobe levels. This minimizes interference with
`respect to satellites that are neighbors to the satellite being
`used.
`A monopulse comparator difference channel is employed
`to control antenna aiming so as to keep the phased array
`pointed at the satellite regardless of the attitude of the
`aircraft. The output of the antenna is despread, demodulated,
`(optionally) decoded and decompressed for use on board the
`aircraft.
`Where the aircraft has an on board video source, such as
`a video teleconference system, the same basic communica
`tion techniques employed for ground-to-air video transmis
`sions are employed for the transmission of video from the
`aircraft. Compression of the video on the aircraft reduces the
`required e.i.r.p. from the aircraft and increases attainable
`spread spectrum processing gain. Spectrum spreading
`reduces the spectral density of the transmitted signal, which
`reduces the transmit antenna’s aperture size required to
`allow the transmitted signal to remain within FCC require
`ments, so as not to interfere with other satellites.
`In addition to maintaining the phased array antenna on
`board the aircraft pointed at the satellite, it is necessary to
`maintain the polarization of the receive and transmit arrays
`aligned with those of the relay satellite. For this purpose the
`output of each antenna element preferably drives a polariz
`ing network containing respective vertical and horizontal
`polarization associated 90° hybrids and two phase shifters.
`The phase shift elements are operative to rotate the polar
`izations of the input waveforms output by the antenna
`elements, so that any linear polarization can be obtained at
`the hybrid outputs. Corresponding ports of each 90° hybrid
`are summed together. The resulting amplitude and phase of
`the summation output is proportional to the sine and cosine
`of the angular error between the phase shifter settings and
`the angular offset of the phased arrays relative to the
`polarization. Other acceptable means of varying the antenna
`polarization include mechanically adjustable polarizers
`(which are especially applicable for the hybrid electro
`mechanical array mentioned previously). The summation
`outputs are demodulated in respective ‘polarization channel’
`and ‘data charmel’ receivers. The ‘data channel’ receiver is
`used to phase lock the ‘polarization channel’ receiver. Func
`tionally, the outputs of the respective receivers are then
`multiplied together in a mixer to derive an error signal which
`is a function of the sine of twice the angular polarization
`error. (In accordance with a preferred implementation, mul
`tiplication is achieved digitally, after matched ?ltering in
`both receivers.) This output of the “mixer” is coupled
`through a lowpass loop ?lter to reduce the noise and to
`provide a zero steady state tracking error. The lowpass
`?ltered signal is used to adjust the settings of the phase shift
`elements of the phased arrays, in accordance with a phased
`
`4
`array weight control mechanism (for steering the beam
`pattern of the phased array) contained within the antenna
`control processor. The transmit array’s polarization angle is
`slaved to that of the receive array. Because the preferred
`phased arrays are conformal or non-planar, it is necessary to
`modify the phase shift settings produced by the antenna
`steering mechanism executed by the control processor
`according to the degree of departure of the conformal
`geometry of the array from a planar con?guration. For this
`purpose, a coordinate transformation look-up table is
`coupled in the control feedback path from the antenna
`steering mechanism and the phase shift elements of the
`phased array.
`In addition to video communications, the present inven
`tion can accommodate other signal formats, such as data
`from terminals, digital telephony, etc. Simultaneous com
`pressed video and data can be transmitted via TDM, FDM,
`CDM or a combination thereof.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`FIG. 1 diagrammatically illustrates a communication sys
`tem in accordance with an embodiment of the present
`invention for effecting full motion and resolution broadcast
`quality video communications between a satellite-linked
`earth station and an aircraft;
`FIGS. 2A and 2B, taken together, diagrammatically illus
`trate the system architecture of an earth station for sourcing
`video signals to be transrrritted to an aircraft from a com
`mercial satellite providing one or more channels of com
`mercial television prograrnnring and teleconference video
`signals sourced from a teleconferencing site linked to the
`earth station, the earth station also receiving video etc.
`signals from the aircraft;
`FIGS. 3A and 3B, taken together, show the system archi
`tecture of the video transceiver on board an aircraft;
`FIG. 4 diagrammatically shows fuselage-mounted con
`formal phased array antenna comprising two separate pairs
`of transmit and receive phased arrays, one of which is
`mounted on the port side of the top of the fuselage of the
`aircraft and the other of which is mounted on the starboard
`side of the top of the aircraft fuselage;
`FIG. 5 shows a low pro?le, conformal con?guration of a
`transmit, receive phased array pair formed of a laminate
`structure having a top layer that contains a two-dimensional
`array of antenna elements and a bottom layer through which
`a transmission line interconnect is distributed; and
`FIG. 6 shows the polarization tracking mechanism asso
`ciated with the antenna elements of a respective conformal
`phased array comprised of a two-dimensional distribution of
`dual polarization antenna elements.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`Before describing in detail the satellite-linked video com
`munication system in accordance with the present invention,
`it should be observed that the present invention resides
`primarily in what is effectively a novel combination of
`conventional signal processing and communication circuits
`and components and not in the particular detailed con?gu
`rations thereof. Accordingly, the structure, control and
`arrangement of these conventional circuits and components
`have been illustrated in the drawings by readily understand
`able block diagrams which show only those speci?c details
`that are pertinent to the present invention, so as not to
`obscure the disclosure with structural details which will be
`
`25
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1028 - Page 10
`
`

`
`5,463,656
`
`15
`
`25
`
`5
`readily apparent to those skilled in the art having the bene?t
`of the description herein. Thus, the block diagram illustra
`tions of the Figures do not necessarily represent the
`mechanical structural arrangement of the exemplary system,
`but are primarily intended to illustrate the major structural
`components of the system in a convenient functional group
`ing, whereby the present invention may be more readily
`understood.
`FIG. 1 diagrammatically illustrates a satellite-to-aircraft
`communication system in accordance with an embodiment
`of the present invention for effecting full motion and reso
`lution broadcast quality video communications between a
`satellite-linked earth station 11 and an aircraft 12. Video
`signals to be transmitted to the aircraft may originate from
`a variety of sources, such as a TV-receive only satellite
`receiver, CATV, etc. For purposes of presenting an exem
`plary embodiment, the video signals will be assumed to
`include both commercial television programming down
`linked from a commercial satellite 13, as well as private
`teleconference video signals sourced from a teleconferenc
`ing site 14, which is linked to earth station 11 by land lines,
`microwave or ?ber-optic links, shown generally at 15.
`The video signals received by earth station 11 are pro
`cessed for transmission to aircraft 12 by way of a transmit!
`receive antenna dish 16. Antenna 16 uplinks an RF carrier
`upon which the video has been modulated to a relay satellite
`23. The video processing mechanism, to be described more
`fully below with reference to FIGS. 2A and 2B, involves
`digitizing the video signals to a prescribed data rate and then
`compressing the digitized video to a prescribed data rate
`(e. g. aT1 data rate of 1.544 Mb/s). The compressed digitized
`video signal can be subjected to (optional) forward error
`correction encoding and spread spectrum-modulated onto a
`carrier for transmission to relay satellite 23. Spread spec
`trum-modulation of the signal reduces its power spectral
`density. The spread signal is transmitted via uplink channel
`21 (e. g. Ku band) to relay satellite 23. Relay satellite 23 then
`retransrnits the spread signal over a downlink transmission
`channel 31 (e.g. Ku-band) to aircraft 12.
`The aircraft 12 receives the satellite’s downlink channel
`retransmission via a compact phased array antenna 35,
`which may be totally electronically scanned or it may only
`be partially electronically scanned. As noted above, a phased
`array which is only partially electronically scanned is one
`which scans electronically in one dimension (e.g. elevation)
`and mechanically in the other (e. g. rotational). In a preferred
`embodiment of the invention, phased array antenna 35 is
`con?gured so as to be conformal with the aircraft surface,
`for example, on the top of the fuselage as two sets of
`transmit and receive phased arrays, one transmit, receive
`pair on the port side and the other on the starboard side of
`the aircraft. Alternatively, transmit and receive functions
`may be combined into a single array, although generally at
`the expense of increased aperture size due to additional
`losses and/or half duplex duty cycle. This port/starboard
`separation provides approximately full hemispherical cov
`erage with the satellite regardless of the attitude of the
`aircraft. A single antenna may be used in place of the
`port-starboard pair in situations where a more restricted
`beam scanning volume is acceptable. Mounting the antenna
`on the top of fuselage not only saves cabin space, but,
`because of its relatively thin, conformal con?guration, mini
`mizes antenna visibility and reduces drag. In addition to
`occupying less volume than would a purely mechanically
`steered antenna, such a compact phased array antenna 35
`provides the required amount of antenna gain.
`Uplink transmissions received at the aircraft from relay
`
`6
`satellite 23 are processed through a data recovery receiver,
`which despreads and demodulates the received signal. The
`demodulated video is then reconstructed for distribution to
`a variety of terminals and monitors on board the aircraft.
`Downlink transmissions from the aircraft may include both
`data and telephony transmissions, including control and
`overhead signalling, such as that employed for channel
`selection, and also video signalling in the case that telecon
`ferencing capability is provided.
`FIGS. 2A and 2B, taken together, diagrammatically illus
`trate the system architecture of earth station 11 for the
`present example of sourcing video signals to be transmitted
`to aircraft 12 from both commercial satellite 13, which
`provides commercial television programming, as well as
`private teleconference video signals sourced from telecon
`ferencing site 14 linked to the earth station. In the present
`example, commercially broadcast television signals are
`derived via a TV receive-only (e.g. C-band or Ku-band)
`satellite receiver 201 which is coupled to receiving antenna
`17, to which satellite 13 downlinks the analog FM television
`programming (eventually to be replaced with digital trans
`mission), selected channel(s) of which are forwarded by
`earth station 11 to aircraft 12. Receiver 201 outputs base~
`band analog video signals received by antenna 17, which are
`then processed for transmission via antenna 16 to relay
`satellite 23.
`The processing mechanism employed in accordance with
`the present invention initially involves digitizing (via an
`A-D converter, included in video compression unit 203) the
`television channel(s) supplied by receiver 201 to a pre
`scribed data rate and compressing the digitized television
`signal(s) by way of video compression unit 203. For this
`purpose, video compression unit 203 may comprise a Rem
`brandt II/VP compressor/decompressor unit the CTX PlusTM
`algorithm, manufactured by CM (Compression Labs Inc.).
`Compressing the video reduces (e. g. by nearly two orders of
`magnitude) its data rate which, for example, may be on the
`order of 100 Mb/s, while maintaining both full resolution
`and motion associated with broadcast quality television
`signals. Since the video compression operation e?ectively
`narrows the information bandwidth, it inherently contributes
`to a reduction in the receive aperture size required to
`maintain a given bit error rate. The compressed information
`bandwidth also facilitates spread spectrum processing to be
`subsequently performed.
`The compressed digitized television signal produced by
`video compression unit 203 is supplied to transmit stage
`204-1. Additional transmitter stages 204 may be included
`which are controllably tunable to respective ones of a
`plurality of video channels that are available for transmis—
`sion to the aircraft and are operative to place compressed
`video (or auxiliary data and telephony) signals onto a carrier
`for transmission to the relay satellite 23.
`For this purpose each modulation stage 204-i has a
`multiplexer 205, to a first input 202 of which a compressed
`video channel (or other data) of interest is coupled. As set
`forth above, the video channel may be derived either from
`the downlinked channels output by TVRO receiver 201,
`from one or more teleconferencing sites 14 served by earth
`station 11, or any other desired data source. The output of
`multiplexer 205 is coupled to (an optional) forward error
`correction unit 207. Error correction unit 207 may comprise
`an STEL-2020 Convolutional Encoder Viterbi Decoder
`manufactured by Standford Telecommunications, Inc.
`Using error correction coding in conjunction with eflicient
`(e.g. coherent PSK-type or MSK) data modulation further
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`Petitioners' Ex. 1028 - Page 11
`
`

`
`5,463,656
`
`10
`
`40
`
`7
`reduces the aperture size for a given bit error rate. A second
`input 206 of multiplexer 205 is derived from an earth station
`control processor 210 through which the operation of earth
`station 11 is controlled. Control processor 210 may comprise
`a processor-based transceiver controller, such as an LCP HI
`Local Control Processor manufactured by TelMac., the
`supervisory functionality is effected by means of a resident
`communication control program, such as a System 90,
`manufactured by CCS (Corporate Computer Systems). The
`second input provides data/overhead signalling capability
`customarily employed for communication system control
`functions. The output of forward error correction unit 207 is
`coupled to a PSK/Spread Spectrum modulator 216, such as
`an STEL-2173 NCO in conjunction with an STEL-1032
`PRN Coder, manufactured by Standford Telecommunica
`tions, Inc. (or a CD7000 cellular telephone by Qualcomm),
`which performs initial carrier modulation of the compressed
`video along with PN spreading onto an IF carrier.
`Spread spectrum modulation reduces the spectral density
`of the modulated signal. The spread spectrum processing
`performed by unit 213 can take the form of direct PN
`sequence modulation and/or frequency hopping, for
`example. As described previously, spread spectrum process
`ing reduces power spectral density for FCC compliance,
`prevents unauthorized users from demodulating the video
`signal and enables the receiver on the aircraft to reject
`interfering transmissions from other satellites.
`The spread IF signal is coupled to an up-converter 217,
`which up-converts the spread IF by mixing it with the output
`of frequency synthesizer 214, such as that used in the
`CV-121 Ku-band SATCOM transmitter manufactured by
`Comstream Corp., which is referenced to a stable frequency
`source 215. The synthesizer frequency is selected by control
`processor 210. The level of the resulting spread RF signal
`may be (optionally) adjusted by a variable attenuator 219 for
`application to one port of a summing unit 222, the output of
`which is supplied to high power ampli?er 221. The output of
`high power ampli?er 221 is coupled to input port 223 of a
`diplexer 225.
`Summing unit 222 is coupled to receive the outputs of the
`respective signal transmitter stages 204-1 . . . 204~N. The T1
`data rate information channels that are coupled to modula
`tion stages 204, may include teleconference and data chan
`nels, as discussed above. The resulting multi-channel sum~
`mation signal from summing unit 222 is coupled from
`diplexer 225 to antenna 16, which outputs the multi-channel
`signal over uplink channel 21 to relay satellite 23. Relay
`satellite 23 then retransmits the combined channels over a
`downlink channel 31 to aircraft 12.
`The receiver section of earth terminal 11, shown in FIG.
`2B, includes a low noise ampli?er 231 which is coupled to
`an output port 232 of diplexer 225. The output of low noise
`ampli?er 231 is coupled to a power divider 233, which has
`a plurality of outputs coupled to respective inputs of a set of
`receiver stages 234-1 .
`.
`. 234-M. Within a respective
`receiver stage 234, its power divider input is coupled to an
`RF-IF down-converter 236, followed by a despreading
`demodulator unit 238. Under the control of a frequency
`synthesizer 237, such as that used the DER-401 Ku-band
`SATCOM receiver manufactured by Comstrearn Corp.,
`down-converter 236 reduces the carrier frequency of the
`spread signal to IF. The IF signal is then despread in
`despreading demodulator 238, such as that used in the
`Qualcomm CD7000 cellular phone hand set, where the
`original PSK modulation is also removed to recover infor
`mation signals (which may include video, such as telecon
`ference signals) sourced aboard the aircraft.
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`8
`The output of despreading demodulator 238 may be
`coupled to an optional FEC decoder 24 and then to a
`demultiplexer 243, which extracts the compressed inforrna~
`tion (e.g. video) signal on a ?rst output channel 244 and
`overhead, control and data on a second output channel 245.
`Output channel 244, which may contain compressed video
`that has been sourced from the aircraft 12 is coupled to a
`remote site teleconference system 14. Output channel 245
`may contain channel request information from the aircraft
`that instructs the control processor 210 to effect a change in
`the selected television broadcast channel, as will be
`described below with reference to FIGS. 3A-3B.
`Referring now to FIGS. 3A and 3B taken together, the
`system architecture of the video transceiver aboard the
`aircraft 12 is shown as comprising a physically compact,
`phased array antenna 35, which is preferably confonnally
`con?gured, so that it may be mounted atop the fuselage of
`the aircraft. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of
`the invention, phased

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket